Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Original article
  • Open Access

Purification and characterization of an amyloglucosidase from an ericoid mycorrhizal fungus (Leohumicola incrustata)

AMB Express20188:154

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0685-1

  • Received: 12 July 2018
  • Accepted: 24 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

This study aimed to purify and characterize amyloglucosidase (AMG) from Leohumicola incrustata. AMG was purified to homogeneity from cell-free culture filtrate of an ERM fungus grown in a modified Melin–Norkrans liquid medium. The molecular mass of the AMG was estimated to be 101 kDa by combining the results of Sephadex G-100 gel filtration, sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and zymography. The Km and kcat values were 0.38 mg mL−1 and 70 s−1, respectively, using soluble starch as a substrate. The enzyme was stable at 45 °C (pH 5.0), retaining over 65% activity after a pre-incubation period of 24 h. The metal inhibition profile of the AMG showed that Mn2+ and Ca2+ enhanced activity, while it was stable to metals ions, except a few (Al3+, Co2+, Hg2+ and Cd2+) that were inhibitory at a concentration higher than 5 mM. Thin layer chromatography revealed that only glucose was produced as the product of starch hydrolysis. The amylase from L. incrustata is a glucoamylase with promising characteristics such as temperature stability over an extended period, high substrate affinity and stability to a range of chemicals. Also, this study reports for the first time the possibility of using some culturable ERM fungi to produce enzymes for the bio-economy.

Keywords

  • Amyloglucosidase
  • Chromatography
  • Ericoid mycorrhiza
  • Starch
  • Zymography

Introduction

Leohumocola incrustata is a genus of mycorrhizas commonly found within the roots of ericaceous plants. Ericaceous plants belong to a family of plants that can alter their physiological or morphological characteristics in nutrient deficient ecosystems. The survival of ericaceous plants in nutrient–deficient soils depends strongly on the symbiotic association that exists between them and mycorrhizal fungi, where nutrients are made available from soil organic matter through the assistance of hydrolytic enzymes. Ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) fungi have been found to produce hydrolytic enzymes (Cairney and Burke 1994, 1998) which include the production of amyloglucosidase. Other reports have also indicated that the enzymatic degradation of organic polymers in the soil and the transfer of some of the resulting products to the root is a significant benefit to the growth and development of ericaceous plants (Smith and Read 2008). A new area of biotechnological research now focuses on the production and characterization of enzymes from various sources with unique properties (Karim et al. 2017). Some of the desired characteristics of industrial enzymes include thermostability, specificity and pH stability. The application of amylases has increased over the years in areas such as juice processing, processing of starch, resizing of textiles, paper sizing, detergent additives, malting barley and bakery industries (Singh et al. 2016; Rana et al. 2017; Raveendran et al. 2018).

Alpha-amylase and glucoamylase are the two major classes of amylases, mostly identified among microorganisms (John 2017). Alpha-amylases are exo-acting enzymes that randomly cleave the 1,4-α-d-glucosidic linkages between adjacent glucose units in the linear amylose chain. Amyloglucosidase (AMG, glucoamylase, EC 3.2.1.3) is an enzyme that is capable of hydrolyzing the α-1,4 glycosidic bonds from the non-reducing ends of starch to produce glucose. It is also an exo-acting enzyme that catalyzes the production of β-d-glucose from the non-reducing ends of substrates that include starch, and maltooligosaccharides by consecutively hydrolyzing α-1,4 and α-1,6 linkages (Sauer et al. 2000; Riaz et al. 2012; John 2017; Raveendran et al. 2018).

Starch is one of the most abundantly distributed polysaccharides produced by plants. It is made up of two molecular weight polymers, amylose and amylopectin. Amylose is a linear chain of glucose residues linked by α-1,4 bonds while amylopectin is a branched polymer with α-1,4-linked and α-1,6-linked glucose residues. AMG serves as a raw material for fermentation in the production of ethanol, glucose syrups, and in some cases can be used to improve barley mash for beer production (Aiyer 2005; Zambare 2010). Consequently, AMG can be considered as an economically significant enzyme because of its effectiveness in hydrolyzing starch and some oligosaccharides into β-d-glucose. Glucoamylase has been reported in Rhizopus oryzae (Morita and Fujio, 2000), Aspergillus awamori (Negi and Banerjee 2009), Aspergillus niger (Slivinski et al. 2011), as well as in two ectomycorrhizal fungi, Tricholoma matsutake and Lyophyllum shimeji (Hur et al. 2001; Kusuda et al. 2004). Kusuda et al. 2004 characterized an extracellular glucoamylase from L. shimeji, stating that the enzyme was most active at around 40 °C. More recently, this enzyme has been reported to be produced from some microorganisms, viz, Aspergillus flavus (Karim et al. 2017) and Tetracladium sp. (Carrasco et al. 2017). In this study, an amyloglucosidase from L. incrustata was purified and characterized.

Materials and methods

Culture

An ericoid mycorrhizal fungus, L. incrustata (Isolate code ChemRU330/Genbank accession no: MF374380/South African National Collection of Fungi accession no: PPRI 17268), was obtained from the Mycorrhizal Research Laboratory, Rhodes University, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa. The isolate was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Incubation was performed at 28 °C for 21 days. The mycelia were kept on PDA, stored at 4 °C and regularly subcultured throughout the study period.

Production of amylase

Soluble Starch (1% w/v, Merck, Cas # 9005-84-9) was added to a 1000 mL−1 Erlenmeyer flask in an modified Melin–Norkrans (MMN) broth with the composition: (g L−1): glucose 1.0; yeast extract 3.0; malt extract 1.0; (NH4)2HPO4 0.25; KH2PO4 0.50; MgSO4·7H2O 0.15; CaCl2 0.05; NaCl 0.025; thiamine-HCl 100 µg L−1, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.003, and 1.2 mL of FeCl3 (1% w/v). Production medium was thoroughly mixed, and a 250 mL was placed in a 500 mL shake flask. The medium was sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min and was inoculated with five discs of 5 mm mycelial plugs of the fungus. The uninoculated medium was used as a control. Growth was allowed to proceed at 28 °C in the dark for 3 weeks on a rotary incubator shaker at 150 rpm. After 42 days of growth, the cultures were homogenised using IKA’s ULTRA-TURRAX homogeniser (20,000 rpm), and centrifugation was performed at 10,000×g for 15 min to obtain crude enzyme filtrates (supernatant) using a Beckman Coulter Avanti-J high-speed centrifuge.

Assay for amylase

A dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay (Miller 1959) was conducted by adding 1% (w/v) soluble starch to a volume of 10 mL sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) in a Schott bottle and boiled for 30 s. A volume of 100 μL of crude enzyme and uninoculated control was added to 300 μL of the soluble starch-containing medium in triplicate, while the blank contained 400 μL buffer. All samples were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 6000×g for 2 min. A 300 μL aliquot of DNS was added to 150 μL of each supernatant sample. This was followed by boiling on a heating block at 100 °C for 5 min after which it was cooled on ice for 5 min. A volume of 250 μL of each sample was placed into each well of a 96-well plate and read with the aid of a spectrophotometer (BioTek’s Synergy Mx) at a wavelength of 540 nm. The supernatant was taken to determine the reducing sugar using DNS assay with glucose as a standard.

Protein analysis

Protein content was determined with Bradford reagent assay kit using bovine serum albumin as standard (Bradford 1976).

Ammonium sulphate precipitation

A 120 mL volume of the crude enzyme was brought to 80% saturation with solid ammonium sulphate according to the method of Kusuda et al. (2004). The mixture was left overnight at 4 °C on a magnetic stirrer. The pellet obtained from the centrifuged mixture was re-dissolved in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) to make up a volume of 10 mL.

Dialysis of the partially purified enzyme

A pre-treated dialysis bag was used for the dialysis (10 kDa cut-off) of the enzyme collected after ammonium sulphate precipitation. The partially purified enzyme (10 mL) was dialyzed against 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) at 4 °C with three changes of a buffer according to the method described by Kusuda et al. (2004).

Gel filtration

A vertical glass chromatographic column (1.5 × 50 cm) was packed using Sephadex G-100. The dialyzed enzyme solution (1.5 mL) was used after it was concentrated by ultrafiltration (Amicon Ultra-100 centrifugal filter device; cut-off 10 kDa). Gel filtration chromatography was carried out using sodium acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 5.0), at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1. All fractions collected were subjected to analysis by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm, followed by the activity assay, the active fractions (fractions no. 36–40; 5 mL) were pooled together afterwards.

Identification of hydrolytic products using thin layer chromatography (TLC)

Soluble starch was used as the substrate. The mixture was incubated in a dry heating block at 45 °C for 1 min up to 24 h and samples were removed at various time intervals for analysis. Samples were then boiled for 5 min at 100 °C to denature the proteins and then centrifuged at 6000×g for 5 min. The supernatant (80 µL) was used for TLC analysis. Identical volumes (5 µL) of the supernatant were applied to Silica Gel 60G F254 HPTLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Plates were developed twice with n-butanol: acetic acid: water (2:1:1, v/v/v). Then, to detect carbohydrates, plates were briefly submerged in methanol containing 5% (v/v) sulfuric acid and 0.3% α-naphthol. Plates were then air dried, heated at 120 °C for 10 min and observed for the bands formed by various hydrolytic products.

AMG activity staining (zymography)

The enzyme from crude extract was analyzed by its native protein pattern using the copolymerization method of Martinez et al. (2000). Sample was diluted in 1:1 in sample buffer (0.125 M Tris; 20% v/v glycerol; 0.04% v/v bromophenol blue) and boiled at 95 °C for 5 min. The resolving gel (12%) consisted of:- polyacrylamide 4.0 mL, 1.5 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.8) 2.5 mL, distilled water 2.25 mL, 2% w/v soluble starch 1.25 mL, 10% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) 100 µL, 10% w/v ammonium persulfate 50 µL, and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) 5 µL. The stacking gel (4%) consisted of: polyacrylamide 0.65 mL, 0.5 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 6.8) 1.25 mL, distilled water 3.05 mL, 10% w/v SDS 50 µL, 10% w/v ammonium persulfate 25 µL, and TEMED 5 µL. Starch-SDS-PAGE (PAGE—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) was carried out in two phases viz. gels were first subjected to a constant voltage of 30 V for 30 min to ensure the tracking dye (bromophenol blue) enters the separating gel. After this, gels were finally subjected to a constant voltage of 100 V for 75 min. Electrophoresis was carried at a temperature of 0–2 °C to allow the enzyme to migrate inactively without hydrolyzing the starch. After electrophoresis, the gel was washed in distilled water and then incubated in 0.1 M phosphate-citrate and 0.05 M NaCl buffer (pH 6.0) for 3 h at 39 °C. Again, gels were washed and fixed in 12% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 10 min, followed by another washing and gently shaking (50 rpm) in 2.5% w/v Triton X-100 for 1 h at 4 °C to remove SDS and restore activity. Finally, the gels were stained with Lugol solution (6.7 mg mL−1 KI and 3.3 mg mL−1 I2), and photographs were taken.

Molecular weight determination by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis

SDS-PAGE was performed using 8 × 10 × 0.75 cm gels in a Mini-Protean II (Bio-Rad) gel apparatus. Samples were treated with reducing (containing 2-mercaptoethanol) sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before loading the gel. After electrophoresis, proteins in the gel were visualized by staining with Coomassie Blue R-250 (Laemmli 1970).

Effect of pH on activity and stability of the AMG

The optimum pH for the enzyme was determined by incubating enzyme with the substrate (1%, w/v) prepared in 0.1 M buffer having pH values of 1.0, 2.0 (hydrochloric acid–potassium chloride); 3.0 (citrate); 4.0, 5.0 (acetate); 6.0, 7.0 (phosphate); 8.0 and 9.0 (Tris–HCl) at a temperature of 45 °C for 1 h, after which the enzyme activity was measured. The pH stability was determined by pre-incubating the enzyme in buffers of different pH (3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0) at 37 °C for 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 h before determining the residual activity by the standard procedure.

Effect of temperature on activity and stability of the AMG

The optimum pH for the enzyme was determined by incubating enzyme with the substrate (1% w/v) prepared in 0.1 acetate buffer (pH 5.0). The enzyme was incubated at different temperatures of 4, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 °C for 1 h, after which, the enzyme activity was measured. The temperature stability was investigated by pre-incubating the enzyme at different temperatures (37, 45, 50, 60, and 70 °C) for 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 min before determination of the residual activity by the standard procedure.

Effect of metal ions and other additives on the activity of the AMG

Metal ions such as K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Hg2+, and Cd2+ (all supplied in chloride form) were each applied to determine the effect on the activity of the enzyme. Each metal ion was used at a concentration of 1, 5, and 10 mM, while incubation was performed at 45 °C for 1 h. The following compounds—sodium azide (NaN3), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Tween 20, SDS, and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) were tested for their inhibitory effect on AMG activity. The purified enzyme was incubated at 45 °C for 1 h in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0), containing each inhibitor or denaturing agent at final concentrations of 1, 5, and 10 mM, respectively. The relative enzyme activity was determined under standard assay conditions.

Enzyme kinetics

The Michaelis–Menten substrate saturation curve was used to determine the Km and Vmax value of the AMG by measuring the rate of soluble hydrolysis under standard assay conditions. The reaction mixture was 20 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0), with the soluble starch substrate at concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 10 mg mL−1. The values for Km and Vmax were then determined using KaleidaGraph.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Data were analysed on Microsoft® Excel software, and all values were presented as the standard errors of the means (± SEM).

Results

Purification of enzyme

The production of AMG from L. incrustata was induced by the addition of soluble starch into a mineral medium at a temperature of 28 °C for 42 days (pH 5.0). Table 1 summarizes the purification steps of the AMG solution prepared from the cell-free culture filtrate (120 mL). Partial purification of the AMG by ammonium sulphate [(NH4)2SO4] precipitation was the first step of the purification procedure; the filtrate was precipitated at 80% saturation. The ammonium sulphate fraction yielded 71% activity with purification fold of 13.7 and specific activity of 15.8 U mg−1 protein. The dialysis step produced a 54% activity with purification fold of 18.61 and specific activity of 21.5 U mg−1 protein. The elution profile on Sephadex G-100 showed that peak (b) (Fig. 1) exhibited high AMG activity, while other peaks did not show any noticeable amylase activity. The gel purification step yielded 27% activity with purification fold of 23.5 and a specific activity of 27.17 U mg−1 protein (Table 1).
Table 1

Purification table of AMG from Leohumicola incrustata

Purification step

Total protein (mg)

Total activity (U)

Specific activity (U mg−1 protein)

Purification fold

Yield (%)

Cell-free filtrate

234.709

271.080

1.155

1.000

100

(NH4)2SO4

12.152

192.139

15.812

13.690

71

Dialysis

6.848

147.207

21.495

18.611

54

Gel filtration

2.698

73.326

27.174

23.528

27

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Chromatogram of the crude enzyme fractions of Leohumicola incrustata on a Sephadex G-100 chromatographic column (flow rate: 1.2 mL min−1)

Enzyme characterization

Fractions showing the highest AMG activities (fractions 36–40) were pooled for characterization studies (Fig. 1). Figure 2 shows the pattern of TLC of AMG hydrolysis from L. incrustata. The reaction time ranged from 1 to 10 min (Fig. 2a), 10 min to 90 min and 24 h (Fig. 2b) at 45 °C. A single band of clearance zone was revealed after activity gel analysis, which indicated that the L. incrustata released a single isoform of the AMG (Fig. 3). Also, SDS-PAGE was carried out to confirm homogeneity of the enzyme using a 12% gel. Thus Fig. 3 shows the results of SDS-PAGE and zymography. The molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated to be 101 kDa using a standard curve of log (MW) versus Rf. Figure 4 shows the result of gel filtration on SDS-PAGE to obtain a single homogeneous protein band (101 kDa).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Thin-layer chromatograms of hydrolyzates. Plates were developed twice with n-butanol: acetic acid: water (2:1:1, v/v/v). The plates were briefly submerged in methanol containing 5% (v/v) sulfuric acid and 0.3% α-naphthol. Standard (Std): glucose (G1), maltose (G2), maltotetraose (G4), and maltopentaose (G5), substrate control (C1), enzyme control (C2), reaction time: 0–90 min and 24 h

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

12% Zymogram and SDS-PAGE analysis of the AMG prepared according to the method described by Martinez et al. (2000). a Lane 1 is precision plus unstained protein standard (BIO-RAD), lanes 2–5 is a crude enzyme of Leohumicola incrustata (iodine staining); b lane 1 is precision plus unstained protein standard (BIO-RAD), lanes 2–5 is SDS-PAGE of crude AMG

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

12% SDS-PAGE analysis of the AMG (Laemmli 1970): lane 1 is colour pre-stained standard, broad range (BioLabs); AMG crude enzyme (lanes 2, 3); the post-gel filtration chromatography protein bands (lanes 4, 5)

Effect of pH on enzyme activity and stability

Effect of pH on enzyme activity was tested using reaction mixtures buffered at different pH values ranging from 1.0 to 9.0, for optimal activity (Fig. 5). The findings showed that the highest activity of the purified enzyme was obtained at pH 4.0, and more than 50% activity was retained between pH 4.0 to 6.0. At pH 5.0 (37 °C) over a period of 24 h, the enzyme was 100% stable (Fig. 6). Hence, the enzyme displayed optimal activity under a mildly acidic pH. The AMG activity was also observed to be stable (above 50%) up to 6 h at a pH of 7.0 (37 °C) but dropped rapidly after 12 h (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Effect of pH on Leohumocola incrustata specific activity. The enzyme was incubated at 45 °C for 1 h. All error bars are represented as the standard errors of the means (SEM)

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Effect of pH on stability of the AMG. The enzyme was pre-incubated (37 °C) for 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 h before the assay was carried out at 45 °C for 1 h. All error bars are represented as the standard errors of the means (SEM)

Effect of temperature on activity and stability of AMG

The effect of temperature on AMG showed that the enzyme reached its optimum activity at a temperature of 50 °C (Fig. 7). Lowest activities were observed at 4 °C and 70 °C, while no apparent activity was recorded at 80 °C (Fig. 7). The enzyme also displayed its highest stability at 45 °C and was least stable at 70 °C (Fig. 8). The enzyme retained at least 65% of its original activity at a temperature between 37 and 45 °C up to 30 h, while less than 60% activity was retained up to 30 h at a temperature of 50 °C (Fig. 8).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Effect of temperature on the AMG activity. The enzyme was incubated at the temperature of 4 to 80 °C for 1 h. All error bars are represented as the standard errors of the means (SEM)

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Effect of temperature on the stability of the AMG activity. The enzyme was pre-incubated for 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 h before the assay was carried out at 45 °C for 1 h (pH 5.0). All error bars are represented as the standard errors of the means (SEM)

Effect of metal ions and additives on the activity of AMG

Table 2 shows the effect of the presence of metal ions on AMG activity measured at pH 5.0 and a temperature of 45 °C. Assays were performed with the addition of each metal ion with the concentration ranging from 1 to 10 mM. The chloride salts of these metal ions were used. Manganese (Mn2+) and calcium (Ca2+) have the highest relative activity values of 112 and 106% at 10 mM concentration. Cobalt (Co2+), mercury (Hg2+), cadmium (Cd2+) and aluminium (Al3+) all inhibited the enzyme, with values of 77, 0.45, 4 and 86%, respectively, at the same concentration. Other metal ions tested did not have any significant effect on AMG activity. Table 3, on the other hand, shows the influence of the additives (other chemicals) on AMG activity. SDS had the highest inhibitory effect on the various concentrations used, followed by EDTA at a concentration of 10 mM only, while other tested additives were not inhibitory to the AMG activity.
Table 2

Effect of the presence of metal ions on AMG activity

Metal ion

% Relative activity (10 mM)

% Relative activity (5 mM)

% Relative activity (1 mM)

Mg2+

98 ± 4.7

99 ± 6.33

100 ± 3.87

Na+

102 ± 9.78

100 ± 7.14

101 ± 6.14

K+

96 ± 5.66

99 ± 6.74

101 ± 6.97

Al3+

86 ± 3.05

95 ± 5.68

100 ± 4.27

Mn2+

112 ± 7.41

102 ± 2.8

100 ± 4.98

Ca2+

106 ± 5.95

100 ± 2.17

100 ± 2.31

Fe2+

98 ± 4.7

100 ± 1.18

100 ± 1.28

Co2+

77 ± 3.51

95 ± 2.93

100 ± 3.95

Hg2+

0.45 ± 0.05

59 ± 0.19

92 ± 2.23

Cd2+

4 ± 0.23

66 ± 2.17

100 ± 3.16

All values are represented by the standard errors of the means (± SEM)

Table 3

Effect of the presence of additives on AMG activity

Additive

% Relative activity (10 mM)

% Relative activity (5 mM)

% Relative activity (1 mM)

NaN3

100 ± 7.28

102 ± 4.99

101 ± 5.28

NH4Cl

101 ± 1.69

101 ± 4.25

101 ± 8.05

EDTA

92 ± 5.59

102 ± 9.5

102 ± 6.73

SDS

5.37 ± 0.32

39.8 ± 1.64

87.9 ± 4.48

Tween20

99.7 ± 1.75

100 ± 4.91

101 ± 5.77

DMSO

99.7 ± 8.12

101 ± 1.45

102 ± 3.12

IAA

99.6 ± 7.69

102 ± 8.88

102 ± 4.83

All values are presented by the standard errors of the means (± SEM)

Enzyme kinetics

Figure 9 shows the result of a graph after plotting the concentration of starch [S] versus initial velocity Vo of AMG enzyme activity. [S]/Vo represents the ratio of starch concentration to the initial velocity of the AMG enzyme activity (Fig. 9). Km represents the Michaelis–Menten constant of the AMG enzyme and Vmax, the maximum velocity achieved by AMG enzyme-starch reaction. AMG enzyme produced by L. incrustata has a Km value of 0.38 mg mL−1 and a Vmax value of 22.56 U mL−1. Hence, AMG enzyme produced by L. incrustata has a high affinity for starch. The turnover number (kcat) and specificity constant were calculated to be 70 s−1 and 184 mg mL−1 s−1, respectively.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Michaelis–Menten type kinetics of the purified AMG enzyme versus soluble starch concentration. All error bars are represented as the standard errors of the means (SEM) (m1 = Vmax and m2 = Km)

Discussion

Amyloglucosidase enzyme was produced under liquid-state fermentation conditions using a modified Melin–Norkrans medium. The elution profile on Sephadex G-100 was sufficient to obtain a single protein band which confirmed the purity of the enzyme. Thin layer chromatography patterns of the hydrolysis products demonstrated that only glucose was produced as an end product of enzyme activity (Fig. 2). This agrees with the reports that most fungi produced glucose as the product of AMG hydrolysis (Kusuda et al. 2004; Negi and Banerjee 2009; Slivinski et al. 2011). The product of the ammonium sulphate precipitation and the dialysis displayed specific activity values of 15.8 and 21.5 U mg−1 protein, respectively (Table 1). The amylase analysis by zymography revealed the formation of a single amylolytic band on the starch-SDS gel (indicative of a single isoform). After gel filtration, the enzyme was found to be homogeneous on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4) with a specific activity value of 27.174 U mg−1 protein at a temperature of 37 °C. Furthermore, the findings on the SDS-PAGE showed many protein bands with no amylase activity except a single band of AMG which had a molecular weight of 101 kDa (Fig. 4). This underpins the reports of some authors that the molecular weights of AMG in most fungi were within a range of 11.5–118 kDa (Hur et al. 2001; Nguyen et al. 2002; Kusuda et al. 2004; Slivinski et al. 2011).

The optimum pH and stability were determined (Figs. 5, 6), the optimum pH for AMG from was pH 4.0, and the enzyme was most stable at a pH of 5.0. A change in the pH of 1.0 unit resulted in decreased activity. The results were similar to the report of Slivinski et al. in 2011, who stated that the pH stability range for A. niger was within 4.0–6.0 at temperatures between 40 and 60 °C. Kusuda et al. (2004) also reported that the glucoamylase obtained from an ectomycorrhizal fungus (L. shimeji) was most active at around 40 °C (pH 5.0) and stable at pH between 4.5 and 6.5 for 30 min at 37 °C. The AMG from L. incrustata was found to exhibit a steady activity at a temperature of 37 °C and 45 °C, retaining over 65% of AMG activity up to 24 h at 45 °C (Fig. 8). The activity declined with increased temperature. The stability of the AMG at 45 °C was an improvement, considering the report of Hur et al. (2001) who revealed that the α-amylase and glucoamylase from T. matsutake were only stable at 4 °C to 30 °C for 30 min.

Some metal such as Co2+, Hg2+, Cd2+ and Al3+ have been reported to have an inhibitory effect on biomolecules (Tamás et al. 2014). The inhibitory effect of these metals (Co2+, Hg2+ and Cd2+) on the AMG activity was significant to various degrees at all the concentrations tested (Table 2), but more pronounced at a concentration of 10 mM. It has been suggested that inhibition by Hg2+ and other heavy metal ions are not only related to binding to the thiol groups but may be the result of interactions with tryptophan residues or the carboxyl groups of amino acids in the enzyme (Selvakumar et al. 1996). For additives (other chemicals), the inhibitory effect of SDS on the AMG activity was the most significant (Table 3), this merely indicated that SDS is a denaturant (Michaux et al. 2008), while other tested additives were not inhibitory to the AMG activity. The AMG kinetics revealed that the activity increased with increased starch concentration, recording a Vmax value of 22.56 U mL−1 and Km of 0.38 mg mL−1. This corroborates the report of Slivinski et al. (2011) who observed similar results. The AMG from L. incrustata had a high substrate affinity which suggested its suitability for industrial applications. Moreso, the AMG turnover number (kcat) was (70 s−1) on soluble starch compared well with those of Humicola and Aspergillus species. Riaz et al. (2012) reported a kcat value of 69 s−1 for Humicola sp. and also, a much higher kcat value (343 s−1) was reported for A. niger (Riaz et al. 2012). The Km and kcat values reported in this study were better than those reported by some authors. For example, 4.5 g L−1 and 45 min−1 were reported for Tetracladium sp. (Carrasco et al. 2017); 3.8 mg/mL and 41.7 s−1 for Paecilomyces variotii (Michelin et al. 2008) (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of the kinetic parameters of Leohumicola incrustata and other fungi

Organism

Km (mg mL−1)

kcat (s−1)

References

Leohumicola incrustata

0.38

70

Current study

Humicola sp.

0.26

69

Riaz et al. (2012)

Aspergillus niger

0.25

343

Riaz et al. (2012)

Tetracladium sp.

4.5

0.75

Carrasco et al. (2017)

Paecilomyces variotii

3.8

41.7

Michelin et al. (2008)

In conclusion, the approach of sourcing enzymes from the environment is proving to be useful in producing novel enzymes that are suitable for the bio-economy. Our L. incrustata is just one out of many ericoid mycorrhizal root endophytes that could be employed for the production of enzymes for the bio-economy. This present study described, for the first time, the purification and characterization of an amyloglucosidase from L. incrustata. Keeping in mind, all the promising characteristics such as temperature stability over an extended period, high substrate affinity, stability to a range of chemicals and being non-pathogenic make AMG a possible candidate for future application in industrial processes, for example, can be used in the production of bioethanol and glucose syrup.

Abbreviations

AMG: 

amyloglucosidase

ERM: 

ericoid mycorrhizal

SDS–PAGE: 

sodium sulphate dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TLC: 

thin layer chromatography

PDA: 

potato dextrose agar

DNS: 

dinitrosalicyclic acid

BSA: 

bovine serum albumin

TEMED: 

tetramethylethylenediamine

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulphoxide

EDTA: 

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

IAA: 

indole-3-acetic acid

SEM: 

standard errors of the means

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ORA, BIP and JFD designed the research; ORA preformed all the experiments and data analysis. All authors were involved in data interpretation and the writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Isolates credit: Dr. Christine Bizabani, Rhodes University, Mycorrhizal Research Laboratory, Grahamstown, South Africa.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The fungal isolate used for this study was cultured from roots of ericaceous plants (Erica chamissonis) (Bizabani 2015). Leohumicola incrustata. (Isolate code ChemRU330/Genbank Accession Number MF374380/The South African National Collection of Fungi Accession Number PPRI 17268), was obtained from Mycorrhizal Research Laboratory, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies concerned with experiments on human or animals.

Funding

This study was funded by Rhodes University, Sandisa Imbewu Grant, South Africa and Adekunle Ajasin University/Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund), Nigeria.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Adekunle Ajasin University, P.M.B. 001, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria

References

  1. Aiyer PV (2005) Amylases and their applications. Afr J Biotechnol 4:1525–1529Google Scholar
  2. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cairney JWG, Burke RM (1994) Fungal enzymes degrading plant cell walls: their possible significance in the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycol Res 98:1345–1356View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairney JWG, Burke RM (1998) Extracellular enzyme activities of the ericoid mycorrhizal endophyte Hymenoscyphus ericae (Read) Korf and Kernan: their likely roles in decomposition of dead plant tissue in soil. Plant Soil 205:181–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrasco M, Alcaíno J, Cifuentes V, Baeza M (2017) Purification and characterization of a novel cold-adapted fungal glucoamylase. Microb Cell Fact 16:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0693-x View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hur T, Ka K, Joo S, Terashita T (2001) Characteristics of the amylase and its related enzymes produced by ectomycorrhizal fungus Tricholoma matsutake. Mycobiology 29:183–189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. John J (2017) Amylases-bioprocess and potential applications: a review. Intl J Bioinform Biol Sci 5(2):41–50View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Karim KMR, Husaini A, Tasnim T (2017) Production and characterization of crude glucoamylase from newly isolated Aspergillus flavus NSH9 in liquid culture. Am J Biochem Mol Biol 7(3):118–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kusuda M, Ueda M, Konishi Y, Matsuzawa K, Shirasaka N, Nakazawa M (2004) Characterisation of extracellular glucoamylase from the ectomycorrhizal mushroom Lyophyllum shimeji. Mycoscience 45:383–389View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinez TF, Alarcon FJ, Moyano MDFJ (2000) Improved detection of amylase activity by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with copolymerized starch. Electrophoresis 21:2940–2943View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Michaux C, Pouyez J, Wouters J, Privé GG (2008) Protecting role of cosolvents in protein denaturation by SDS: a structural study. BMC Struct Biol 8:29View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Michelin M, Ruller R, Ward RJ, Morais LAB, Jorge JA, Terenzi HF, Polizeli MLTM (2008) Purification and biochemical characterization of a thermostable extracellular glucoamylase produced by the thermotolerant fungus Paecilomyces variotii. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:17–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Morita H, Fujio Y (2000) Effect of organic nitrogen sources on raw starch-digesting glucoamylase production of Rhizopus sp. MKU 40. Starch/Stärke 52:18–21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Negi S, Banerjee R (2009) Optimization of extraction and purification of glucoamylase produced by Aspergillus awamori in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol Bioprod Eng 14:60–66View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen QD, Rezessy-Szabo JM, Claeyssens M, Stals I, Hoschke A (2002) Purification and characterisation of amylolytic enzymes from thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus strain ATCC 34626. Enzyme Microb Technol 31:345–352View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Rana N, Verma N, Vaidya D, Dipta B (2017) Application of bacterial amylase in clarification of juices and bun making. J Pharm Phytochem 6(5):859–864Google Scholar
  19. Raveendran S, Parameswaran B, Ummalyma SB, Abraham A, Mathew AK, Madhavan A, Rebello S, Ashok Pandey A (2018) Applications of microbial enzymes in food industry. Food Tech Biotechnol 56(1):16–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Riaz M, Rashid MH, Sawyer L, Akhtar S, Javed MR, Nadeem H (2012) Physiochemical properties and kinetics of glucoamylase produced from deoxy-glucose resistant mutant of Aspergillus niger for soluble starch hydrolysis. Food Chem 130:24–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sauer J, Sigurskjold BW, Christensen U, Frandsen TP, Mirgorodskaya E, Harrison M (2000) Glucoamylase: structure/function relationships, and protein engineering. Biochimica et Biophys Acta 1543:275–293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Selvakumar PI, Ashakumary L, Helen A, Pandey A (1996) Purification and characterization of glucoamylase produced by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol 23:403–406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh R, Kumar M, Mittal A, Mehta PK (2016) Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. 3. Biotechnology 6:174Google Scholar
  24. Slivinski CT, Machado AVL, Iulek J, Ayub RA, de Almeida MM (2011) Biochemical characterisation of a glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger produced by solid-state fermentation. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 54:559–568View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Ericoid, orchid and mycoheterotrophic mycorrhizas. Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 387–507Google Scholar
  26. Tamás MJ, Sharma SK, Ibstedt S, Jacobson T, Christen P (2014) Heavy metals and metalloids as a cause for protein misfolding and aggregation. Biomolecules 4:252–267View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zambare V (2010) Solid state fermentation of Aspergillus oryzae for glucoamylase production on agro-residues. Inter J Life Sci 4:16–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement