Skip to content

Advertisement

AMB Express

AMB Express Cover Image
Original article
Open Access

Thermophilic bacteria are potential sources of novel Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases

AMB Express20177:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0318-5

©  The Author(s) 2017

Received: 8 November 2016

Accepted: 23 December 2016

Published: 4 January 2017

Abstract

Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases, which have a Rieske-type [2Fe–2S] cluster and a non-heme catalytic iron center, are an important family of oxidoreductases involved mainly in regio- and stereoselective transformation of a wide array of aromatic hydrocarbons. Though present in all domains of life, the most widely studied Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases are found in mesophilic bacteria. The present study explores the potential for isolating novel Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases from thermophilic sources. Browsing the entire bacterial genome database led to the identification of 45 homologs from thermophilic bacteria distributed mainly among Chloroflexi, Deinococcus–Thermus and Firmicutes. Thermostability, measured according to the aliphatic index, showed higher values for certain homologs compared with their mesophilic relatives. Prediction of substrate preferences indicated that a wide array of aromatic hydrocarbons could be transformed by most of the identified oxygenase homologs. Further identification of putative genes encoding components of a functional oxygenase system opens up the possibility of reconstituting functional thermophilic Rieske non-heme iron oxygenase systems with novel properties.

Keywords

Rieske non-heme iron oxygenaseOxidoreductaseThermophilesAromatic hydrocarbonsBiotransformation

Introduction

Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases (ROs) constitute a large family of oxidoreductase enzymes involved primarily in the oxygenation of various aromatic compounds. Although Gibson et al. (1968) first detected the involvement of such an enzyme system in an alkylbenzene-degrading Pseudomonas sp., the family has since garnered a great deal of attention for two major reasons. First, ROs are key enzymes responsible for the initial attack on otherwise inert aromatic nuclei, thereby making them targets of a cascade of downstream enzymes, leading to their complete mineralization (Gibson and Subramanian 1984; Allen et al. 1995; Gibson and Parales 2000; Mallick et al. 2011). Secondly, regio- and stereoselective cis-dihydroxylation of aromatic compounds, catalyzed by ROs, generate impressive chiral intermediates in the synthesis of a wide array of agrochemically and pharmaceutically important compounds (Ensley et al. 1983; Wackett et al. 1988; Hudlicky et al. 1999; Bui et al. 2002; Newman et al. 2004; Boyd et al. 2005; Zezula and Hudlicky 2005).

Members of the RO family are usually either two- or three-component systems in which one or two soluble electron transport (ET) proteins (such as ferredoxin and reductase) transfer electrons from reduced nucleotides, such as NAD(P)H, to the terminal oxygenase component (a large α-subunit, often accompanied by a small β-subunit),which in turn catalyzes the di- or mono-oxygenation of the aromatic nucleus of the substrate (Mason and Cammack 1992; Ferraro et al. 2005). Numerous ROs have been identified and characterized from bacteria, thereby enriching the available information on their diversity in terms of both sequence and function (Habe and Omori 2003; Iwai et al. 2010, 2011; Chakraborty et al. 2012). Although found in all three domains of life, studies have shown that ROs occur more commonly in bacteria compared with archaea and eukaryotes (Chakraborty et al. 2012). Homologs of the large (α) subunit of RO terminal oxygenase (ROox) have also been investigated in certain plant species, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Zea mays, Pisum sativum, Oryza sativa, Physcomitrella patens, Amaranthus tricolor, Ocimum basilicum and Spinacia oleracea (Caliebe et al. 1997; Meng et al. 2001; Reinbothe et al. 2004; Berim et al. 2014), as well as in insects, nematodes and vertebrates (Rottiers et al. 2006; Yoshiyama et al. 2006; Yoshiyama-Yanagawa et al. 2011). ROs from these taxa, however, have entirely different functions from those of bacterial aromatic ring-hydroxylating ROs. They either act as proteintranslocons, facilitating transport across the chloroplastic envelope membranes during chlorophyll biosynthesis, or are involved in flavone and hormone metabolism in plants. They have also been suggested to be involved in regulation of cholesterol metabolism or trafficking during steroid synthesis in insects (Caliebe et al. 1997; Meng et al. 2001; Reinbothe et al. 2004; Rottiers et al. 2006; Yoshiyama et al. 2006; Yoshiyama-Yanagawa et al. 2011; Berim et al. 2014).

Interestingly, few bacterial RO homologs with novel functions, such as oxidative cyclization during biosynthesis of certain antibiotics, hydroxylation and desaturation of short-chain tertiary alcohols and alkane monooxygenation, have been reported in recent years (Sydor et al. 2011; Schäfer et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013). This suggests that ROs bear much more catalytic potential than previously realized. Almost all bacterial ROs characterized biochemically to date have been isolated from mesophilic bacteria, with the sole exception of polychlorinated biphenyl degrading ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase from Geobacillus sp. JF8 (Mukerjee-Dhar et al. 2005; Shintani et al. 2014). As such, very little is known about RO homologs present in bacteria that live in extreme environments. Extremophiles, and in particular their enzymes, have proved to be a potentially valuable resource in the development of novel biotechnological processes. The most well-studied extremophiles include thermophiles and hyperthermophiles, and enzymes isolated from such microorganisms are often extremely thermostable and resistant to proteolysis, chemical denaturants, detergents, and organic solvents (Vieille and Zeikus 2001). Apart from enzymatic stability at high temperatures, which is often desired in industrial processes, there are several advantages of thermophilic systems in bioremediation studies. Owing to the poor aqueous solubility of aromatic hydrocarbons, biodegradation studies often encounter problems related to bioavailability. These issues can be overcome at elevated temperatures, since bioavailability tends to increase with temperature owing to increases in solubility (Margesin and Schinner 2001; Feitkenhauer and Märk 2003; Perfumo et al. 2007). Thermophilic microorganisms may thus be attractive candidates for sources of novel thermostable ROs with potential utility in industrial biosynthesis and bioremediation at elevated temperatures.

In recent years, microbial genome sequencing projects have generated an enormous quantity of data for public databases. Since publication of the genome sequence of the first extremophile in 1996 (Bult et al. 1996), there has been a substantial increase in the number of extremophilic genome sequences. Metagenomics and single-cell genomics further add to this repertoire (Hedlund et al. 2014). The present study explored all available genome sequences of thermophilic bacteria for the presence of RO homologs and predicted their suitability as novel RO candidates for biotechnological applications.

Materials and methods

Screening thermophilic bacterial genomes for the presence of ROox α-subunit homologs

Functionally characterized ROs have been categorized into five different similarity classes (A, B, C, D and D*) based on their phylogenetic distribution, substrate preferences and mode of attack on aromatic nuclei (Chakraborty et al. 2012). The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ‘genome’ and ‘taxonomy’ databases were searched to characterize the distribution of thermophilic bacteria among different bacterial lineages and the availability of their genome sequences. Representative ROox α-subunit sequences from each class were used as query probes (Table 1) to perform blastp (Altschul et al. 1990) searches against the translated set of genome sequences. Blast searches were also performed using each thermophilic RO as a query against the NCBI non-redundant database to characterize their distribution among thermophiles (and/or other extremophiles) and mesophiles.
Table 1

List of queries used for blast analysis against genomes of thermophilic bacteria

Target gene

Query

Type

Organism

GenBank accession no.

RO α-subunit

Naphthalene dioxygenase (NahAc)

A-IIIαβ

Pseudomonas putida NCIB 9816-4

AAO64274

Benzoate dioxygenase (BenA)

B-IIαβ

Rhodococcus jostii RHA1

BAB70698

Salicylate 5-hydroxylase (NagG)

C-IIIαβ

Ralstonia sp. U2

AAD12607

Carbazole dioxygenase (CarAaII)

D-VIIα

Sphingomonas sp. KA1

YP_717942

3-Ketosteroid 9α-hydroxylase (KshA)

D-Iα

Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37rv

NP_218043

Ferredoxin

AntAb associated with anthranilate dioxygenase

Rieske type [2Fe–2S]

Sphingomonas sp. KA1

YP_717959

CarAcI associated with carbazole dioxygenase

Plant type [2Fe–2S]

Sphingomonas sp. KA1

YP_717977

PhtA3 associated with phthalate dioxygenase

[3Fe–4S] type

Terrabacter sp. DBF63

BAC54160

Rub1 associated with naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase

Rubredoxin

Rhodococcus sp. P200

AAR05110

Reductase

KshB associated with 3-Ketosteroid 9α-hydroxylase

FNRc type

Rhodococcus erythropolis PR4

BAH32483

CarAd associated with carbazole dioxygenase

FNRn type

Pseudomonas sp. XLDN4-9

AAY56344

FdrI associated with carbazole dioxygenase

GR type

Sphingomonas sp. KA1

YP_718026

HpaC associated with 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase

Flavin reductase

Thermus thermophilus HB8

2ECU_A

Rubredoxin-NAD(+) reductase

Rubredoxin reductase

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Q9HTK9

FNRc ferredoxin-NAD reductase fused with a plant-type [2Fe–2S] domain at the C-terminus, FNRn ferredoxin-NAD reductase fused with a plant-type [2Fe–2S] domain at the N-terminus, GR glutathione reductase

Phylogenetic clustering and prediction of substrate preferences

The RHObase server (Chakraborty et al. 2014) was used to categorize each candidate thermophilic ROox α-subunit into a similarity class and to obtain the closest biochemically characterized homologs. The substrate prediction module of RHObase was further used to predict the substrate preference of the thermophilic homologs and the possible sites of oxygenation. ClustalX v1.81 (Thompson et al. 1997) was used to obtain multiple sequence alignments and to eliminate redundancy among sequences. The default settings were retained for all parameters, with the exception of the matrix (BLOSUM series) used for both pairwise and multiple alignments. Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on distance data using the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) implemented in ClustalX. The trees were visualized and manipulated using the program TreeExplorer v2.12 (Tamura et al. 2007).

Verification of the integrity of conserved motifs and domain architecture

The ROox α-subunit homologs obtained from the genomes of thermophiles were subjected to ScanProsite (De Castro et al. 2006) and NCBI conserved domain database searches (Marchler-Bauer et al. 2002) to verify the presence of conserved sequence motifs. The relevant motifs were C-X-H-Xn-C-X2-H, corresponding to the N-terminal Rieske [2Fe–2S] center, and D-X2-H-X3,4-H-Xn-D, corresponding to the C-terminal conserved 2-His-1-carboxylate motif preceded by a conserved aspartate (involved in electron transport), as these are the functional prerequisites of ROs (Jiang et al. 1996; Parales 2003). The motifs were compared with those of phylogenetically close mesophilic ROs. For each protein, the aliphatic index (relative volume occupied by aliphatic side chains) (Ikai 1980) was calculated using ProtParam (Gasteiger et al. 2005).

Identification of putative ET components

Genomes exhibiting the presence of ROox α-subunits were searched (using blastp) for genes putatively encoding ET components (both ferredoxin and reductase) using a set of queries (Table 1), followed by manual inspection of each genomic loci when necessary. The queries included the oxidoreductase sequences (e.g., ferredoxin-NAD reductases and glutathione reductase-type reductases and ferredoxins) commonly associated with ROs, as well as other possible oxidoreductases (e.g., flavin reductase and rubredoxin reductase).

Results

Distribution of RO homologs among thermophiles

Browsing the bacterial taxonomy database revealed the existence of several thermophilic genera belonging to different classes/orders. These taxa were concentrated mainly among the phyla Thermotogae, Deinococcus–Thermus, Chloroflexi, Aquificae, Firmicutes, and to some extent, Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Blast searches against all thermophile genomes initially led to the identification of 95 putative ROox α-subunit homologs distributed among 20 different genera (data not shown). Among 45 non-redundant sequences (Table 2), the one obtained from Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025 (GenBank: EPZ42375) was found to be truncated at the N-terminal end and was therefore excluded from further analysis. Analysis of the distribution of the remaining candidate ROs among both thermophiles and mesophiles revealed that they were present mainly among thermophilic strains belonging to the phyla Chloroflexi, Deinococcus–Thermus, Firmicutes and Thermotogae (Fig. 1). However, distant homologs were abundant among mesophilic strains belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.
Table 2

Putative RO terminal oxygenase α-subunit homologues obtained from blastp search against thermophilic genomes

Organism

Annotation

NCBI accn. no.

Phylum: Chloroflexi

 Anaerolinea thermophila UNI-1

Putative oxidoreductase

BAJ63376

 Caldilinea aerophila DSM 14535

Putative oxidoreductase

BAL99910

 Roseiflexus castenholzii DSM 13941

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein

ABU59830

 Roseiflexus sp. RS-1

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein

WP_011955741

 Sphaerobacter thermophilus DSM 20745

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein

ACZ37596

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159

Rieske 2Fe–2S domain protein

ACM04599

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159

3-Phenylpropionate (digoxigenin) dioxygenase

ACM06903

Phylum: Deinococcus–Thermus

 Meiothermus cerbereus DSM 11376

Choline monooxygenase

WP_027876468

 Meiothermus chliarophilus DSM 9957

Choline monooxygenase

WP_027893118

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase, α-subunit

ADD29434

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279

Choline monooxygenase

AGK03951

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234

Hypothetical protein

WP_027881162

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234

Choline monooxygenase

WP_027882714

 Meiothermus silvanus DSM 9946

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulfur domain protein

ADH64647

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022

Choline monooxygenase

WP_018466224

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022

Ribosomal subunit interface protein

WP_026234685

 Thermus igniterrae ATCC 700962

Ribosomal subunit interface protein

WP_018111968

 Thermus oshimai JL-2

Ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase, large terminal subunit

AFV77211

 Thermus scotoductus SA-01

Biphenyl dioxygenase, subunit alpha

ADW21768

 Thermus sp. CCB_US3_UF1

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase, α-subunit

AEV16357

 Thermus thermophilus ATCC 33923

Ribosomal subunit interface protein

WP_024119937

 Thermus thermophilus JL-18

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain-containing protein

AFH40260

Phylum: Firmicutes

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius DSM 446

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulphur domain protein

ACV59062

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius Tc-4-1

2Fe–2S ferredoxin

AEJ44076

 Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025

Hypothetical protein

EPZ45189

 Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025

Hypothetical proteina

EPZ42375

 Alicyclobacillus hesperidum URH17-3-68

3-Phenylpropionate dioxygenase

WP_040289757

 Alicyclobacillus pomorum DSM 14955

Hypothetical protein

WP_035467417

 Bacillus thermotolerans SGZ-8

Phthalate 4,5-dioxygenase oxygenase subunit

KKB35183

 Brevibacillus thermoruber PM1

3-Phenylpropionate dioxygenase

WP_035295329

 Cohnella thermotolerans DSM 17683

Rieske (2Fe–2S) protein

WP_027092788

 Coprothermobacter platensis DSM 11748

Hypothetical protein

WP_018963776

 Geobacillus sp. JF8

Large subunit of biphenyl dioxygenase

AGT33881

 Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NBRC 107763

Putative naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase large subunit

GAJ45328

 Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans ST

Hypothetical protein

WP_051350961

 Thermoactinomycetaceae bacterium GD1

Rieske (2Fe–2S) protein

WP_044639983

 Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum LX-11

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulfur domain protein

AEF16296

Phylum: Thermotogae

 Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM 9078

Ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase, large terminal subunit

AFG35170

 Thermosipho africanus TCF52B

Oxidase-related protein

ACJ75179

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8

Oxidase-related protein

AAD36358

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein

AGL50271

 Thermotoga naphthophila RKU-10

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulphur domain protein

ADA67544

 Thermotoga sp. Mc24

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulfur domain-containing protein

KHC91410

 Thermotoga sp. RQ2

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein

ACB09872

 Thermotoga sp. Xyl54

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulfur domain-containing protein

KHC95729

aProtein truncated at the N-terminal end

Figure 1
Fig. 1

Heat map showing the distribution of α-subunit homologs of thermophilic RO terminal oxygenases among other thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria. Each thermophilic homolog (represented by the corresponding protein name or locus tag followed by the accession number and strain name) was used as a blastp query, and only entries equal to or exceeding the threshold identity of 40% and query coverage of 80% were considered to be positive hits. The distribution is categorized into different taxa (or taxonomic hierarchies), shown on the top, with bacteria belonging to each phylum grouped separately as thermophiles and mesophiles (highlighted with yellow and green backgrounds, respectively). In the heat map, each cell is divided into two blocks; the upper (wider) block shows the percentage identity obtained from blastp, while the lower (narrower) block indicates the number of distinct species obtained from the blast search. Color codes used for each identity range are shown as an inset. Values corresponding to each cell can be obtained from Additional file 1: Table S1

Functional clustering of thermophilic ROox α-subunit homologs

The candidate α-subunit sequences from thermophiles were subjected to phylogenetic studies to assess their relatedness with functionally characterized ROs from other bacteria, as well as from eukaryotes. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) showed that thermophilic homologs were unevenly distributed among all classes of ROs, being clustered in a few specific regions of the tree, again suggesting a radical diversification followed by independent evolution of these genes in thermophiles. As can be seen in Fig. 2, 12 of the sequences clustered with Class A (especially Type A-Vαβ and A-VIαβ) ROs, 1 with Class B ROs, 20 with Class D ROs, and the remaining 11 with Class D* ROs. In all sequences, the conserved N-terminal Rieske [2Fe–2S] motif and C-terminal 2-His-1-carboxylate motif (preceded by a conserved aspartate involved in electron transport), necessary for proper functioning of an RO (Jiang et al. 1996; Parales 2003), is consistent with phylogenetically related, previously characterized ROs (Fig. 3).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Neighbor-joining tree representing the phylogenetic relationship of putative α-subunits of oxygenase components of ROs obtained from thermophilic bacteria (orange font) with homologous sequences from other bacteria and eukaryotes. Each entry is represented by the corresponding protein name or locus tag, followed by the accession number (within parentheses) and the strain name. Values at each node indicate the level of bootstrap support based on 100 resampled datasets, while bootstrap values below 60% are not shown. The bar represents 0.1 substitutions per amino acid. The sequences have been clustered according to similarity class as defined in Chakraborty et al. (2014)

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Comparison of conserved N-terminal Rieske [2Fe–2S] and C-terminal 2-His-1-carboxylate motifs among α-subunits of oxygenase components of putative thermophilic ROs obtained from thermophilic bacteria (orange font) and those obtained from mesophilic bacteria and eukaryotes. The horizontal bars represent the aliphatic index of each sequence. Blue and orange vertical dotted lines indicate the average aliphatic indices obtained for mesophilic (75.25) and thermophilic (80.88) RO homologs, respectively. All those homologs which showed an aliphatic index ≥80.88 are indicated by an arrow, while clades representing only the thermophilic homologs are denoted by asterisks

The aliphatic index is regarded as a positive factor for the increased thermostability of globular proteins (Ikai 1980). Therefore, we calculated this index for each protein as a measure of thermostability. Not all proteins showed significantly higher values compared with their mesophilic homologs (Fig. 3). However, the average value was found to be higher (80.88) in the thermophilic clusters as compared to those of the mesophiles (75.25), with some proteins (e.g., ROs obtained from Thermoactinomycetaceae bacterium GD1 [GenBank ID WP_044639983], Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234 [WP_027881162], Sphaerobacter thermophilus DSM 20745 [ACZ37596] and Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159 [ACM04599]) showing values as high as 90 (Fig. 3).

Prediction of substrate preferences

Table 3 lists the closest biochemically characterized homolog of each candidate ROox α-subunit, as obtained from RHObase (Chakraborty et al. 2014). Preferable substrate(s) for most candidate ROs could be predicted using the RHObase substrate prediction module (Fig. 4). ROox α-subunit homologs belonging to Class A showed a preference for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic polyaromatic hydrocarbons. For one of the Class A ROs, obtained from Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius Tc-4-1, ketosteroid was found to be its putative substrate. The predicted substrates for the Class B ROox α-subunit from Thermus thermophilus JL-18 were carboxylated aromatics, such as p-cumate, while members of Class D showed a preference for carboxylated aromatics such as phthalate, chlorobenzoate, vanillate and phenoxybenzoates, as well as for toluene-4-sulfonate. However, owing to the lack of information regarding the function of Class D* ROs, the substrate preference of these ROs could not be predicted. Apart from MupW and GbcA, involved in the mupirocin (El-Sayed et al. 2003) and glycine betaine (Wargo et al. 2008) biosynthetic pathways, respectively, all other sequences belonging to this class have been derived from whole genome annotations and lack complete information regarding their biochemical function. This makes Class D* the ‘dark matter’ of Rieske oxygenases.
Table 3

The closest characterized homologue of each thermophilic RO terminal oxygenase α-subunit sequence obtained from RHObase

Organism (NCBI accession no. of the putative RO terminal oxygenase α-subunit)

Closest match obtained from RHObase

Accession no.

Identity (%)

Query coverage (%)

Class A

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159 (ACM06903)

Biphenyl 2,3-dioxygenase (BphA1) from Geobacillus sp. JF8

BAC79226

46.10

91

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279 (ADD29434)

Dibenzofuran dioxygenase (NarAa) from Rhodococcus opacus SAO101

BAD02377

50.11

92

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022 (WP_026234685)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

49.89

98

 Thermus igniterrae ATCC 700962 (WP_018111968)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

51.48

99

 Thermus oshimai JL-2 (AFV77211)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

50.34

98

 Thermus scotoductus SA-01 (ADW21768)

Dibenzofuran dioxygenase (NarAa) from Rhodococcus opacus SAO101

BAD02377

51.14

99

 Thermus sp. CCB_US3_UF1 (AEV16357)

Dibenzofuran dioxygenase (NarAa) from Rhodococcus opacus SAO101

BAD02377

51.26

97

 Thermus thermophilus ATCC 33923 (WP_024119937)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

51.03

97

 Alicyclobacillus hesperidum URH17-3-68 (WP_040289757)

Dibenzofuran dioxygenase (NarAa) from Rhodococcus opacus SAO101

BAD02377

43.02

93

 Brevibacillus thermoruber PM1 (WP_035295329)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

44.59

92

 Geobacillus sp. JF8 (AGT33881)

Biphenyl 2,3-dioxygenase (BphA1) from Geobacillus sp. JF8

BAC79226

100.00

100

 Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NBRC 107763 (GAJ45328)

Indene dioxygenase (NidA) from Rhodococcus sp. I24

AAD25395

45.81

93

Class B

 Thermus thermophilus JL-18 (AFH40260)

p-Cumate dioxygenase (CmtAb) from Pseudomonas putida F1

AAB62285

45.37

94

Class D

 Anaerolinea thermophila UNI-1 (BAJ63376)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.04

31

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234 (WP_027881162)

Vanillate O-demethylase (VanA) from Pseudomonas sp. ATCC19151

AAA26019

32.10

47

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius DSM 446 (ACV59062)

Toluene-4-sulfonate methyl monooxygenase (TsaM2) from Comamonas testosteroni T-2

AAK37996

32.45

32

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius Tc-4-1 (AEJ44076)

3-Ketosteroid 9α-hydroxylase (KshA) from Rhodococcus opacus B-4

BAH52700

30.54

54

 Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025 (EPZ45189)

Toluene-4-sulfonate methyl monooxygenase (TsaM2) from Comamonas testosteroni T-2

AAK37996

30.22

48

 Alicyclobacillus pomorum DSM 14955 (WP_035467417)

3-Chlorobenzoate-3,4/4,5-dioxygenase (CbaA) from Comamonas testosteroni BR60

AAC45716

27.56

50

 Bacillus thermotolerans SGZ-8 (KKB35183)

Phthalate 4,5-dioxygenase (Pht3) from Pseudomonas putida

BAA02511

37.86

94

 Cohnella thermotolerans DSM 17683 (WP_027092788)

Phthalate 4,5-dioxygenase (OphA2) from Burkholderia cepacia DBO1

AAD03558

36.24

97

 Coprothermobacter platensis DSM 11748 (WP_018963776)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.93

51

 Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans ST (WP_051350961)

Toluene-4-sulfonate methyl monooxygenase (TsaM2) from Comamonas testosteroni T-2

AAK37996

30.12

46

 Thermoactinomycetaceae bacterium GD1 (WP_044639983)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

34.78

54

 Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum LX-11 (AEF16296)

Vanillate O-demethylase (VanA) from Pseudomonas sp. HR199

CAA72287

31.84

48

 Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM 9078 (AFG35170)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

34.13

47

 Thermosipho africanus TCF52B (ACJ75179)

Vanillate O-demethylase (VanA) from Pseudomonas sp. HR199

CAA72287

33.92

46

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (AAD36358)

3-Chlorobenzoate-3,4/4,5-dioxygenase (CbaA) from Comamonas testosteroni BR60

AAC45716

25.35

65

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (AGL50271)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.72

64

 Thermotoga naphthophila RKU-10 (ADA67544)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.32

73

 Thermotoga sp. Mc24 (KHC91410)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.72

73

 Thermotoga sp. RQ2 (ACB09872)

3-Chlorobenzoate-3,4/4,5-dioxygenase (CbaA) from Comamonas testosteroni BR60

AAC45716

25.35

65

 Thermotoga sp. Xyl54 (KHC95729)

Dicamba O-demethylase (DdmC) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia DI-6

AAV53699

32.72

73

Class D*

 Caldilinea aerophila DSM 14535 (BAL99910)

Phenylpropionate dioxygenase from Phenylobacterium zucineum HLK1a

WP_012521516

36.50

71

 Roseiflexus castenholzii DSM 13941(ABU59830)

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1Ta

WP_011995073

33.92

75

 Roseiflexus sp. RS-1 (WP_011955741)

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1Ta

WP_011995074

33.63

81

 Sphaerobacter thermophilus DSM 20745 (ACZ37596)

Aromatic oxygenase (GbcA) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

NP_254097

31.36

88

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159 (ACM04599)

Aromatic oxygenase (GbcA) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

NP_254097

29.47

91

 Meiothermus cerbereus DSM 11376 (WP_027876468)

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1Ta

WP_011995073

26.91

80

 Meiothermus chliarophilus DSM 9957 (WP_027893118)

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1Ta

WP_011995073

28.25

77

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279 (AGK03951)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain-containing protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1a

WP_011995073

40.68

76

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234 (WP_027882714)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain-containing protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1a

WP_011995073

26.84

84

 Meiothermus silvanus DSM 9946 (ADH64647)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain-containing protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1a

WP_011995073

29.83

80

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022 (WP_018466224)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain-containing protein from Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1a

WP_011995073

27.81

78

aBiochemically uncharacterized protein

Figure 4
Fig. 4

Venn diagram showing the relationship between thermophilic ROs and substrate preference as predicted by RHObase. Putative substrate(s) obtained for each thermophilic RO are shown in detail in Additional file 1: Table S2

Reconstitution of functional RO systems

As discussed earlier, the oxygenase α-subunit is often accompanied by a small β-subunit, and these subunits function in combination with one or two ET component(s). All observations discussed thus far concern the α-subunits of ROox. However, to reconstitute a functional RO system, all of the above components must work together in a coordinated manner. Whenever present, the genes encoding both α-and β-subunits are usually co-localized. Thus, the genome of each thermophile bearing the candidate ROox α-subunit homologs was screened for the presence of genes putatively encoding the ET component(s). Several putative genes (listed in Table 4) were identified and, in most cases, were located at a distance from the terminal oxygenase genes. As expected, putative ferredoxin and reductase components, along with the β-subunit of ROox, could be identified in most organisms bearing Class A and B ROs. The genome of Thermus thermophilus ATCC 33923 had no adjacent β-subunit and did not yield any ferredoxin hits with the queries used. Alicyclobacillus hesperidum URH17-3-68 and Brevibacillus thermoruber PM1 were also found to lack ferredoxin. Among Class D ROs, D-IVα and D-VIIα type ROs form three-component systems containing both ferredoxin and reductase (Chakraborty et al. 2012). Similarly, putative ferredoxin and reductase components could be identified in several thermophiles bearing Class D ROs. The only exceptions were Bacillus thermotolerans SGZ-8 and Thermoactinomycetaceae bacterium GD1, neither of which contained any known component apart from the α-subunit.
Table 4

Constituent components, obtained from each thermophile genome, that can be coupled with α-subunit of the terminal oxygenase component in order to reconstitute functional RO system

Organism (NCBI accession no. of the putative RO terminal oxygenase α-subunit)

Protein annotation [accession no.]

Putative function

Class A

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159 (ACM06903)

3-Phenylpropionate dioxygenase subunit beta [ACM06517]

Beta subunit

Rieske protein [ACM07109]

4Fe–4S ferredoxin, iron–sulfur binding domain protein [ACM06911]

Ferredoxin

Ferredoxin–NADP reductase; thioredoxin reductase [ACM06977]

Putidaredoxin reductase [ACM07176]

Thioredoxin reductase [ACM06488]

Reductase

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279 (ADD29434)

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase beta subunit [ADD29433]

Beta subunit

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein [ADD27546]

Ferredoxin

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [ADD29074]

Reductase

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022 (WP_026234685)

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase subunit beta [WP_018466297]

Beta subunit

Diguanylate cyclase [WP_026234838]

Ferredoxin

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_026234742]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_026234716]

hypothetical protein [WP_018465799]

Reductase

 Thermus igniterrae ATCC 700962 (WP_018111968)

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase subunit beta [WP_018111967]

Beta subunit

 Thermus oshimai JL-2 (AFV77211)

Small subunit of phenylpropionate dioxygenase [AFV77212]

Beta subunit

Ferredoxin subunit of nitrite reductase and ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase [AFV75193]

Ferredoxin

NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenase [AFV75199]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [AFV77091]

Flavoprotein oxygenase [WP_016329217]

Reductase

 Thermus scotoductus SA-01 (ADW21768)

3-Phenylpropionate dioxygenase, subunit beta [ADW21767]

Beta subunit

Ferredoxin subunit of phenylpropionate dioxygenase [ADW21026]

4Fe–4S Ferredoxin/formate dehydrogenase, nitrate-inducible, iron–sulfur subunit [ADW21629]

Ferredoxin

NADH oxidase/coenzyme A disulfide reductase [ADW21032]

Phenol hydroxylase component B [ADW21668]

Reductase

 Thermus sp. CCB_US3_UF1 (AEV16357)

Naphthalene dioxygenase small subunit [AEV16358]

Beta subunit

Initial dioxygenase ferredoxin subunit [AEV16981]

Ferredoxin

4-Hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase [AEV16360]

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase [AEV16975]

4-Hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase reductase (Flav_red) [AEV16285]

Reductase

 Thermus thermophilus ATCC 33923 (WP_024119937)

NADH oxidase [WP_024119527]

Reductase

 Alicyclobacillus hesperidum URH17-3-68 (WP_040289757)

Thioesterase superfamily protein [EJY55215]

Beta subunit

Dihydropteridine reductase [WP_006448064]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_006446492]

NADH dehydrogenase [WP_006448257]

Thioredoxin reductase [WP_006447474];

Reductase

 Brevibacillus thermoruber PM1 (WP_035295329)

Aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase [WP_035295713]

Beta subunit

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_035297436]

Reductase

 Geobacillus sp. JF8 (AGT33881)

Small subunit of biphenyl dioxygenase [AGT33882]

Beta subunit

Nitrite reductase NAD(P)H small subunit [AGT32189]

Ferredoxin

Thioredoxin reductase [AGT33412]

Reductase

 Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NBRC 107763 (GAJ45328)

Putative naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase small subunit [GAJ45329]

Beta subunit

Hypothetical protein GT2_34_00240 [GAJ45383]

Ferredoxin

Thioredoxin reductase [GAJ43870]

Coenzyme A disulfide reductase [GAJ42754]

Putative oxidoreductase [GAJ45381]

Reductase

Class B

 Thermus thermophilus JL-18 (AFH40260)

Small subunit of phenylpropionate dioxygenase [AFH40261]

Beta subunit

Ferredoxin subunit of nitrite reductase and ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase [AFH39800]

Ferredoxin

NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenase [AFH39794]

NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenase [AFH40137]

Reductase

Class D

 Anaerolinea thermophila UNI-1 (BAJ63376)

Putative ferredoxin [BAJ63818]

Ferredoxin

Phytoene dehydrogenase [BAJ63379]

Reductase

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234 (WP_027881162)

Dehydrogenase [WP_027881168]

Reductase

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius DSM 446 (ACV59062)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulphur domain protein [ACV58029]

Ferredoxin

Arsenate reductase (thioredoxin) [ACV59045]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding [ACV59470]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding [ACV58921]

Reductase

 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius Tc-4-1 (AEJ44076)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein [AEJ42957]

Ferredoxin

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [AEJ42545]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding protein [AEJ43919]

Reductase

 Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025 (EPZ45189)

Hypothetical protein N007_08015 [EPZ45711]

Hypothetical protein [EPZ45711]

Reductase

 Alicyclobacillus pomorum DSM 14955 (WP_035467417)

Dihydropteridine reductase [WP_035467306]

Reductase

 Bacillus thermotolerans SGZ-8 (KKB35183)

Absent

 

 Cohnella thermotolerans DSM 17683 (WP_027092788)

Ferredoxin [WP_027093665]

Ferredoxin

 Coprothermobacter platensis DSM 11748 (WP_018963776)

2-Enoate reductase [WP_018963737]

Hypothetical protein [WP_018963777]

Reductase

 Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans ST (WP_051350961)

(2Fe–2S)-binding protein [WP_037913512]

Ferredoxin

Hypothetical protein, partial [WP_040767264]

Reductase

 Thermoactinomycetaceae bacterium GD1 (WP_044639983)

Absent

 

 Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum LX-11 (AEF16296)

Rubredoxin-type Fe(Cys)4 protein [AEF16485]

Ferredoxin

Pyruvate ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase [AEF16297]

CoA-disulfide reductase [AEF16270]

Thioredoxin reductase [AEF16306]

Reductase

 Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM 9078 (AFG35170)

Rubredoxin [AFG34604]

Ferredoxin

2-Polyprenylphenol hydroxylase-like oxidoreductase [AFG34955]

Phytoene dehydrogenase-like oxidoreductase [AFG35173]

Thioredoxin-disulfide reductase [AFG35278]

FAD binding protein [AFG35124]

Thioredoxin reductase [AFG34984]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [AFG34941]

Thioredoxin reductase [AFG35081]

Reductase

 Thermosipho africanus TCF52B (ACJ75179)

Rubredoxin [ACJ76024]

Ferredoxin

Oxidoreductase/NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase, na translocating, f-subunit [ACJ75165]

Oxidoreductase/tRNA uridine 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl modification enzyme GidA [ACJ75137]

Ferredoxin/anaerobic glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase [ACJ75136]

Reductase

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (AAD36358)

Rubredoxin [AGL49584]

Ferredoxin

Oxidoreductase [AAD35836]

Reductase

 Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (AGL50271)

Rubredoxin [AGL49584]

Ferredoxin

Oxidoreductase [AAD35836]

Reductase

 Thermotoga naphthophila RKU-10 (ADA67544)

Rubredoxin-type Fe(Cys)4 protein [ADA66551]

Ferredoxin

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase [ADA67462]

Reductase

 Thermotoga sp. Mc24 (KHC91410)

Rubredoxin-type Fe(Cys)4 protein [KHC90328]

Ferredoxin

Oxidoreductase [KHC90231]

Reductase

 Thermotoga sp. RQ2 (ACB09872)

Rubredoxin-type Fe(Cys)4 protein [ACB08629]

Ferredoxin

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase [ACB08534]

Reductase

 Thermotoga sp. Xyl54 (KHC95729)

Rubredoxin-type Fe(Cys)4 protein [KHC96420]

Ferredoxin

Class D*

 Caldilinea aerophila DSM 14535 (BAL99910)

Hypothetical protein [BAL99023]

Ferredoxin

Putative mercuric reductase [BAM01871]

Putative flavin reductase [BAL99068]

Reductase

 Roseiflexus castenholzii DSM 13941 (ABU59830)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein [ABU56444]

Ferredoxin

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [ABU58189]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding [ABU60217]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding [ABU58489]

Reductase

 Roseiflexus sp. RS-1 (WP_011955741)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) domain protein [ABQ89132]

Ferredoxin

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase [ABQ91503]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [ABQ91367]

Flavin reductase domain protein, FMN-binding [ABQ92660]

Flavin reductase domain protein, FMN-binding [ABQ90950]

Reductase

 Sphaerobacter thermophilus DSM 20745 (ACZ37596)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulphur domain protein [ACZ40633]

Ferredoxin

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase [ACZ40632]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding protein [ACZ39977]

Reductase

 Thermomicrobium roseum DSM 5159 (ACM04599)

Rieske protein [ACM07109]

Ferredoxin

Xylene monooxygenase electron transfer subunit [ACM06651]

Ferredoxin–NADP reductase; thioredoxin reductase [ACM06977]

Putidaredoxin reductase [ACM07176]

Thioredoxin reductase [ACM06488]

Reductase

 Meiothermus cerbereus DSM 11376 (WP_027876468)

Diguanylatecyclase [WP_027876040]

Ferredoxin

Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase [WP_027876580]

MFS transporter [WP_027877386]

Reductase

 Meiothermus chliarophilus DSM 9957 (WP_027893118)

Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase [WP_027893501]

MFS transporter [WP_036218580]

Reductase

 Meiothermus ruber DSM 1279 (AGK03951)

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [ADD29074]

Flavin reductase domain-containing FMN-binding protein [AGK04562]

Reductase

 Meiothermus rufus DSM 22234 (WP_027882714)

Dehydrogenase [WP_027881168]

Reductase

 Meiothermus silvanus DSM 9946 (ADH64647)

Rieske (2Fe–2S) iron–sulfur domain protein [ADH62911]

Ferredoxin

FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase [ADH64702]

Flavin reductase domain protein FMN-binding protein [ADH64172]

Reductase

 Meiothermus timidus DSM 17022 (WP_018466224)

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_026234742]

Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase [WP_026234716]

Hypothetical protein [WP_018465799]

Reductase

Discussion

Owing to their extensive presence among Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, all extant ROs are postulated to have originated and evolved within these lineages (Chakraborty et al. 2014). Though the thermophilic RO homologs identified in this study were present among taxonomically close organisms, their distributions were very specific for certain phyla, often with very low abundance (Fig. 1). Thus, it is quite likely that the thermophiles also acquired ROox genes from Proteobacteria or Actinobacteria and further evolved separately. The role of Firmicutes in the evolution of ROs in thermophiles cannot be ruled out, as several RO homologs were found among mesophilic strains of Firmicutes (Fig. 1), especially within the order Bacillales.

Similarly, it would be difficult to claim that only the distantly located ET components identified in this study complement the putative α- and β-subunit genes. It is highly likely that unknown gene(s) vicinal to those encoding the terminal oxygenase(s) are responsible for the proper functioning of the ROs. Similar observations have previously been made in Rhodococcus opacus TKN14, in which rubredoxin and another hypothetical protein were found to be crucial for the oxidation of o-xylene (Maruyama et al. 2005). In another study, the purified large subunit of a novel alkane monooxygenase (belonging to Class B ROs), identified from a cold-tolerant Pusillimonas sp. T7-7, showed NADH-dependent alkane monooxygenase activity (Li et al. 2013). Transformation of aromatic hydrocarbons has also been attained by heterologous expression of the terminal oxygenase components using non-specific ET proteins complemented by the host strain (Mukerjee-Dhar et al. 2005). Although the present study indicates that the RO homologs present in these organisms are either cryptic in nature or are involved in some other physiological function, we cannot rule out the possibility of reconstituting a thermostable functional RO system with novel properties (in terms of substrate preference or mode of catalysis) by combining the terminal oxygenase genes along with all possible combinations of ET components. Integrity of the motif signatures and predicted enhanced thermostability (Fig. 3) further strengthens this hypothesis.

The existence of unexplored microbial diversity, together with the availability of whole genomes, represents a large pool for future industrial catalysts. Thermostable ROs may be attractive candidates for carrying out efficient biotransformation at elevated temperatures. Apart from enhancing our understanding of the distribution of ROs in nature, the present study may aid in designing new bioremediation strategies or industrial biosynthetic processes. Based on the information provided here, functional RO systems can be reconstituted from each organism by cloning both terminal oxygenase and ET genes into suitable vectors and performing biotransformation assays using the predicted substrates (Fig. 4). On the other hand, gene knockout studies can be performed (provided that appropriate genetic tools are available) to help elucidate the physiological role of RO homologs with unknown functions in thermophilic bacteria.

Abbreviations

RO: 

Rieske non-heme iron oxygenase

ROox : 

large (α) subunit of RO terminal oxygenase

ET: 

electron transport

NCBI: 

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NAD(P)H: 

reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All the authors conceived the research work. JC conducted the analyses. JC, CSM, KO and HN analyzed the data. JC drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

JC extends his thanks to the Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo, for providing research facilities.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Funding

This study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). JC was supported by postdoctoral fellowship for foreign researchers from the JSPS.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Allen CR, Boyd DR, Dalton H, Sharma ND, Brannigan I, Kerley NA, Sheldrake NG, Taylor SC (1995) Enantioselective bacterial biotransformation routes to cis-diol metabolites of monosubstituted benzenes, naphthalene and benzocycloalkenes of either absolute configuration. Chem Commun 2:117–118. doi:10.1039/C39950000117 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berim A, Park JJ, Gang DR (2014) Unexpected roles for ancient proteins: flavone 8-hydroxylase in sweet basil trichomes is a Rieske-type, PAO-family oxygenase. Plant J 80:385–395. doi:10.1111/tpj.12642 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd DR, Sharma ND, O’Dowd CR, Carroll JG, Loke PL, Allen CCR (2005) cis-Dihydrodiol, arene oxide and phenol metabolites of dictamnine: key intermediates in the biodegradation and biosynthesis of furoquinoline alkaloids. Chem Commun 31:3989–3991. doi:10.1039/b506944k View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bui VP, Hudlicky T, Hansen TV, Stenstrom Y (2002) Direct biooxidation of arenes to corresponding catechols with E. coli JM109(pDTG602). Application to synthesis of combretastatins A-1 and B-1. Tetrahedron Lett 43:2839–2841. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00389-1 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bult CJ, White O, Olsen GJ, Zhou L, Fleischmann RD, Sutton GG, Blake JA, FitzGerald LM, Clayton RA, Gocayne JD, Kerlavage AR, Dougherty BA, Tomb JF, Adams MD, Reich CI, Overbeek R, Kirkness EF, Weinstock KG, Merrick JM, Glodek A, Scott JL, Geoghagen NS, Venter JC (1996) Complete genome sequence of the methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. Science 273:1058–1073. doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1058 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caliebe A, Grimm R, Kaiser G, Lübeck J, Soll J, Heins L (1997) The chloroplastic protein import machinery contains a Rieske-type iron–sulfur cluster and a mononuclear iron-binding protein. EMBO J 16:7342–7350. doi:10.1093/emboj/16.24.7342 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty J, Ghosal D, Dutta A, Dutta TK (2012) An insight into the origin and functional evolution of bacterial aromatic ring-hydroxylating oxygenases. J Biomol Struct Dyn 30:419–436. doi:10.1080/07391102.2012.682208 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty J, Jana T, Saha S, Dutta TK (2014) Ring-hydroxylating oxygenase database: a database of bacterial aromatic ring-hydroxylating oxygenases in the management of bioremediation and biocatalysis of aromatic compounds. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:519–523. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12182 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Castro E, Sigrist CJ, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Hulo N (2006) ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W362–W365. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl124 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Sayed AK, Hothersall J, Cooper SM, Stephens E, Simpson TJ, Thomas CM (2003) Characterization of the mupirocin biosynthesis gene cluster from Pseudomonas fluorescens NCIMB 10586. Chem Biol 10:419–430. doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00091-7 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ensley BD, Ratzkin BJ, Osslund TD, Simon MJ, Wackett LP, Gibson DT (1983) Expression of naphthalene oxidation genes in Escherichia coli results in the biosynthesis of indigo. Science 222:167–169. doi:10.1126/science.6353574 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Feitkenhauer H, Märk H (2003) Biodegradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Water Sci Technol 47:123–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferraro DJ, Gakhar L, Ramaswamy S (2005) Rieske business: structure-function of Rieske non-heme oxygenases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 338:175–190. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.222 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker JM (ed) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press, New York City, pp 571–607. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571
  16. Gibson DT, Parales RE (2000) Aromatic hydrocarbon dioxygenases in environmental biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:236–243. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00090-2 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson DT, Subramanian V (1984). Microbial degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Gibson DT (ed) Microbial degradation of organic compounds. Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 181–252. doi: 10.1002/actp.1986.010371127
  18. Gibson DT, Koch JR, Kallio RE (1968) Oxidative degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons by microorganisms. I. Enzymatic formation of catechol from benzene. Biochemistry 7:2653–2662. doi:10.1021/bi00847a031 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Habe H, Omori T (2003) Genetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism in diverse aerobic bacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:225–243. doi:10.1271/bbb.67.225 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedlund BP, Dodsworth JA, Murugapiran SK, Rinke C, Woyke T (2014) Impact of single-cell genomics and metagenomics on the emerging view of extremophile “microbial dark matter”. Extremophiles 18:865–875. doi:10.1007/s00792-014-0664-7 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudlicky T, Gonzalez D, Gibson DT (1999) Enzymatic dihydroxylation of aromatics in enantioselective synthesis: expanding asymmetric methodology. Aldrichimica Acta 32:35–62Google Scholar
  22. Ikai A (1980) Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins. J Biochem 88:1895–1898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Iwai S, Chai B, Sul WJ, Cole JR, Hashsham SA, Tiedje JM (2010) Gene-targeted-metagenomics reveals extensive diversity of aromatic dioxygenase genes in the environment. ISME J 4:279–285. doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.104 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iwai S, Johnson TA, Chai B, Hashsham SA, Tiedje JM (2011) Comparison of the specificities and efficacies of primers for aromatic dioxygenase gene analysis of environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3551–3557. doi:10.1128/AEM.00331-11 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang H, Parales RE, Lynch NA, Gibson DT (1996) Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved amino acids in the alpha subunit of toluene dioxygenase: potential mononuclear non-heme iron coordination sites. J Bacteriol 178:3133–3139View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Li P, Wang L, Feng L (2013) Characterization of a novel Rieske-type alkane monooxygenase system in Pusillimonas sp. strain T7-7. J Bacteriol 195:892–1901. doi:10.1128/JB.02107-12 Google Scholar
  27. Mallick S, Chakraborty J, Dutta TK (2011) Role of oxygenases in guiding diverse metabolic pathways in the bacterial degradation of low-molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol 37:64–90. doi:10.3109/1040841X.2010.512268 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchler-Bauer A, Panchenko AR, Shoemaker BA, Thiessen PA, Geer LY, Bryant SH (2002) CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 30:281–283. doi:10.1093/nar/gkg087 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:650–663. doi:10.1007/s002530100701 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maruyama T, Ishikura M, Taki H, Shindo K, Kasai H, Haga M, Inomata Y, Misawa N (2005) Isolation and characterization of o-xylene oxygenase genes from Rhodococcus opacus TKN14. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7705–7715. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.7705-7715.2005 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mason JR, Cammack R (1992) The electron-transport proteins of hydroxylating bacterial dioxygenases. Annu Rev Microbiol 46:277–305. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.001425 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Meng YL, Wang YM, Zhang B, Nii N (2001) Isolation of a choline monooxygenase cDNA clone from Amaranthus tricolor and its expressions under stress conditions. Cell Res 11:187–193. doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290085 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukerjee-Dhar G, Shimura M, Miyazawa D, Kimbara K, Hatta T (2005) bph genes of the thermophilic PCB degrader, Bacillus sp. JF8: characterization of the divergent ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase and hydrolase genes upstream of the Mn-dependent BphC. Microbiology 151:4139–4151. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28437-0 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman LM, Garcia H, Hudlicky T, Selifonov SA (2004) Directed evolution of the dioxygenase complex for the synthesis of furanone flavor compounds. Tetrahedron 60:729–734. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2003.10.105 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Parales RE (2003) The role of active-site residues in naphthalene dioxygenase. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:271–278. doi:10.1007/s10295-003-0043-3 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Perfumo A, Banat IM, Marchant R, Vezzulli L (2007) Thermally enhanced approaches for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 66:179–184. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.006 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Reinbothe S, Quigley F, Gray J, Schemenewitz A, Reinbothe C (2004) Identification of plastid envelope proteins required for import of protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A into the chloroplast of barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2197–2202. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307284101 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Rottiers V, Motola DL, Gerisch B, Cummins CL, Nishiwaki K, Mangelsdorf DJ, Antebi A (2006) Hormonal control of C. elegans dauer formation and life span by a Rieske-like oxygenase. Dev Cell 10:473–482. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.008 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schäfer F, Schuster J, Würz B, Härtig C, Harms H, Müller RH, Rohwerder T (2012) Synthesis of short-chain diols and unsaturated alcohols from secondary alcohol substrates by the Rieske nonheme mononuclear iron oxygenase MdpJ. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6280–6284. doi:10.1128/AEM.01434-12 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Shintani M, Ohtsubo Y, Fukuda K, Hosoyama A, Ohji S, Yamazoe A, Fujita N, Nagata Y, Tsuda M, Hatta T, Kimbara K (2014) Complete genome sequence of the thermophilic polychlorinated biphenyl degrader Geobacillus sp. strain JF8 (NBRC 109937). Genome Announc. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01213-13 Google Scholar
  42. Sydor PK, Barry SM, Odulate OM, Barona-Gomez F, Haynes SW, Corre C, Song L, Challis GL (2011) Regio- and stereodivergent antibiotic oxidative carbocyclizations catalysed by Rieske oxygenase-like enzymes. Nat Chem 3:388–392. doi:10.1038/nchem.1024 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599. doi:10.1038/nchem.1024 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882. doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Vieille C, Zeikus GJ (2001) Hyperthermophilic enzymes: sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:1–43View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Wackett LP, Kwart LD, Gibson DT (1988) Benzylic monooxygenation catalyzed by toluene dioxygenase from Pseudomonas putida. Biochemistry 27:1360–1367. doi:10.1021/bi00404a041 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wargo MJ, Szwergold BS, Hogan DA (2008) Identification of two gene clusters and a transcriptional regulator required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa glycine betaine catabolism. J Bacteriol 190:2690–2699. doi:10.1128/JB.01393-07 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoshiyama T, Namiki T, Mita K, Kataoka H, Niwa R (2006) Neverland is an evolutionally conserved Rieske-domain protein that is essential for ecdysone synthesis and insect growth. Development 133:2565–2574. doi:10.1242/dev.02428 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yoshiyama-Yanagawa T, Enya S, Shimada-Niwa Y, Yaguchi S, Haramoto Y, Matsuya T, Shiomi K, Sasakura Y, Takahashi S, Asashima M, Kataoka H, Niwa R (2011) The conserved Rieske oxygenase DAF-36/Neverland is a novel cholesterol-metabolizing enzyme. J Biol Chem 286:25756–25762. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.244384 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Zezula J, Hudlicky T (2005) Recent progress in the synthesis of morphine alkaloids. Synlett 3:388–405. doi:10.1055/s-2005-862383 Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement