Skip to content

Advertisement

AMB Express
AMB Express Cover Image
  • Original article
  • Open Access

Disruption of PHO13 improves ethanol production via the xylose isomerase pathway

AMB Express20166:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-015-0175-7

©  Bamba et al. 2016

  • Received: 15 October 2015
  • Accepted: 11 December 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Xylose is the second most abundant sugar in lignocellulosic materials and can be converted to ethanol by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains expressing heterologous genes involved in xylose assimilation pathways. Recent research demonstrated that disruption of the alkaline phosphatase gene, PHO13, enhances ethanol production from xylose by a strain expressing the xylose reductase (XR) and xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) genes; however, the yield of ethanol is poor. In this study, PHO13 was disrupted in a recombinant strain harboring multiple copies of the xylose isomerase (XI) gene derived from Orpinomyces sp., coupled with overexpression of the endogenous xylulokinase (XK) gene and disruption of GRE3, which encodes aldose reductase. The resulting YΔGP/XK/XI strain consumed 2.08 g/L/h of xylose and produced 0.88 g/L/h of volumetric ethanol, for an 86.8 % theoretical ethanol yield, and only YΔGP/XK/XI demonstrated increase in cell concentration. Transcriptome analysis indicated that expression of genes involved in the pentose phosphate pathway (GND1, SOL3, TAL1, RKI1, and TKL1) and TCA cycle and respiratory chain (NDE1, ACO1, ACO2, SDH2, IDH1, IDH2, ATP7, ATP19, SDH4, SDH3, CMC2, and ATP15) was upregulated in the YΔGP/XK/XI strain. And the expression levels of 125 cell cycle genes were changed by deletion of PHO13.

Keywords

  • Bioethanol
  • PHO13
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Xylose fermentation
  • Xylose isomerase

Introduction

Bioethanol is widely viewed as a potential new energy source and alternative to fossil fuels. Lignocellulosic materials, which represents an abundant, inexpensive, and renewable resource, are of great interest as a feedstock for bioethanol production. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an ideal host for bioethanol production due to its high stress tolerance, high ethanol production capacity, and ease of gene manipulation. However, S. cerevisiae cannot inherently assimilate xylose, the second most abundant sugar in lignocellulosic biomass (Mosier et al. 2005).

Xylose-assimilating yeast strains have been constructed through genetic engineering to exploit two different heterologous xylose-utilization pathways. The oxidoreductase pathway involves the conversion of xylose to xylitol by xylose reductase (XR) and the conversion of xylitol to xylulose by xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH). Both XR and XDH preferentially utilize different coenzymes, NADPH and NAD+, respectively. Therefore, xylitol accumulates in yeast cells and is secreted into the fermentation medium due to the intracellular redox imbalance caused by the coenzyme preference, leading to poor ethanol yield (Chu and Lee 2007; van Vleet and Jeffries 2009; Matsushika et al. 2009). Another xylose assimilation pathway is catalyzed by xylose isomerase (XI), which directly converts xylose to xylulose. Therefore, XI-expressing strains do not produce excess xylitol. The isomerase pathway is suitable for high-yield ethanol production from xylose; however, the xylose consumption rate and ethanol productivity are low in the XI-expressing strains described thus far (van Maris et al. 2007; Matsushika et al. 2009). S. cerevisiae produces an endogenous non-specific aldose reductase encoded by GRE3. Deletion of GRE3 decreases xylitol excretion not only in strains expressing XR and XDH but also in those expressing XI (Matsushika et al. 2009).

Overexpression of downstream metabolic genes such as XKS1 and genes involved in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) has been used as a strategy to improve the xylose assimilation capacity of S. cerevisiae (Karhumaa et al. 2005; Kuyper et al. 2005a). As S. cerevisiae has no specific transporter for xylose, genes encoding heterologous and endogenous transporters with an affinity for xylose have also been overexpressed to improve xylose uptake (Matsushika et al. 2009). Evolutionary engineering has also been explored as a means to improve xylose utilization under aerobic and oxygen-limited conditions (Kuyper et al. 2005b; Zhou et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2014).

Disruption of PHO13 by transposon mutagenesis was shown to improve xylose assimilation in a recombinant S. cerevisiae strain harboring the XR and XDH genes (Ni et al. 2007). Although PHO13p exhibits alkaline phosphatase activity, it remains unclear whether the protein functions in vivo. XR/XDH-based PHO13 disruptants have demonstrated high ethanol productivity from xylose (van Vleet et al. 2008; Fujitomi et al. 2012; Shen et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013; Li et al. 2014). Deletion of PHO13 in an XI-expressing strain was also shown to effectively enhance cell growth from xylose (Lee et al. 2014), although the mechanism of the PHO13-deletion effect remains unclear.

In this study, PHO13 was disrupted and GRE3 deleted in a yeast strain that harbors multiple copies of the XI gene from Orpinomyces sp. and overexpresses the gene encoding XK. The effect of PHO13 disruption on the metabolome was investigated by both transcriptome and metabolite analysis.

Materials and methods

Strains and media

Escherichia coli NovaBlue (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) was used as the host strain for recombinant DNA manipulation and was grown in Luria–Bertani medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 5 g/L sodium chloride) containing 100 mg/L ampicillin. S. cerevisiae YPH499 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 lys2 trp1 ura3, purchased from Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used as the host strain. Yeast strains were routinely cultivated at 30 °C in synthetic dextrose (SD) medium [6.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) and 20 g/L glucose] supplemented with appropriate amino and nucleic acids.

Construction of plasmids

A DNA fragment containing the S. cerevisiae XK gene (XKS1) was amplified from plasmid pRS406XKS (Madhavan et al. 2009a) as a template using the primer set TDH3-XK F (5′-CCGCACCAGTTCTCACACGGAACACCACTA-3′) and TDH3-XK R (5′-CCACCGCGGTCAATCAATGAATCGAAAATG-3′). The amplified fragment was digested with SacII and then ligated into the NaeI-SacII site of pRS406 to yield plasmid pIUXK. A DNA fragment containing the Orpinomyces sp. XI gene (xylA) (Madhavan et al. 2009a, b) was amplified using the primer set XI F (5′-ATTGAATTCATGACTAAGGAATATTTCCC-3′) and XI R (5′-AATGTCGACTTATTGGTACATGGCAACAA-3′). After digestion with EcoRI and SalI, the xylA-containing fragment was ligated into the EcoRI-SalI site of pGK423 (Ishii et al. 2009). The fragment containing the PGK1 promoter, xylA, and the PGK1 terminator was digested with NotI and XhoI and ligated into the NotI-XhoI site of the chromosomal integration plasmid pδW (Yamada et al. 2010) to yield plasmid pδWXI.

Yeast transformation

A GRE3-knockout strain of YPH499 (YΔG) was constructed using the PCR-mediated seamless gene deletion and marker recycling method (Akada et al. 2006). Plasmid pIUXK, digested with EcoRV, was transformed into YΔG to yield the XK-overexpressing strain YΔG/XK. Plasmid pδWXI, digested with AscI, was transformed into YΔG/XK to yield strain YΔG/XK/XI. Transformants obtained using the lithium-acetate method (Chen et al. 1992) were selected on SD medium supplemented with appropriate amino acids and nucleotides. For the disruption of PHO13 in YΔG/XK/XI, a DNA fragment that included KanMX was amplified from S. cerevisiae BY4741ΔPHO13 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) genomic DNA as a template using the primer set dPHO13-KanMX F (5′-CAAAAAAAGCCTTATAGCTTGCCCTGACAAAGAATATACAACTCGGGAAAAGATCTGTTTAGCTTGCCTCGTCCC-3′) and dPHO13-KanMX R (5′-ATTTTTCCTTTTCAAAAAGTAATTCTACCCCTAGATTTTGCATTGCTCCTGAGCTCGTTTTCGACACTGGATGGC-3′). The DNA fragment was transformed into YΔG/XK/XI to yield YΔGP/XK/XI. YΔGP/XK/XI was isolated on YPD (20 g/L peptone, 10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L glucose) plates containing 500 μg/L G418.

XI activity assay

Extracts of yeast cells for use in the XI activity assay were prepared according to a previously reported method (Zhou et al. 2012). S. cerevisiae was cultivated in SD medium for 24 h, and cells were collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 2300×g and 4 °C. The pellet was washed twice with chilled washing buffer (10 mM phosphate buffer, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) and suspended in chilled extraction buffer (100 mM phosphate buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.5). The suspended cells were mixed with glass beads (0.5-mm diameter), disrupted by shaking at 1500 rpm for 5 min using a Shake Master Neo (Biomedical Science, Tokyo, Japan), and centrifuged at 21,000×g and 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected as the cell extract and mixed with an assay mixture containing 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.15 mM NADH, and 2 U/mL sorbitol dehydrogenase. The assay was performed at 30 °C for 5 min. A 340-nm extinction coefficient for NADH of 6.3 mM−1 cm−1 was used to calculate the specific activity of XI. One unit of XI activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of xylulose per min under the assay conditions.

Determination of the xylA copy number

Genomic DNA from YΔG/XK/XI and YΔGP/XK/XI was extracted using a Dr. GenTLE (yeast) high-recovery kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). The copy number of the xylA gene integrated into the chromosomes of the recombinant strains was determined using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) performed on an Mx3000P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The copy number was calculated according to the standard curve method (De Preter et al. 2002; Jin et al. 2003), with PGK1 serving as the housekeeping gene. The following PCR primers were used to detect PGK1 and xylA, respectively: qXI F, 5′-GATGCTGGTATGCTCGGTTCTA-3′ and qXI R, 5′-AACCTCCACCACGGATGATT-3′; qPGK1 F, 5′-CTTCGGTACCGCTCACAGAG-3′ and qPGK1 R, 5′-CTTGTCAGCAACCTTGGCAC-3′.

Batch fermentation

After pre-incubation in 5 mL of SD medium for 24 h at 30 °C, YΔG/XK/XI and YΔGP/XK/XI cells were cultivated in 500 mL of YPD medium for 48 h at 30 °C under aerobic conditions. Yeast cells were collected by centrifugation at 2500×g for 10 min at 4 °C and then washed twice with distilled water. The cells were inoculated into 50 mL of YP medium (10 g/L yeast extract and 20 g/L peptone) containing 50 g/L xylose or 50 g/L glucose. The initial cell density for fermentation was set at 50 g wet cells/L. Ethanol fermentation was carried out at 30 °C with a mild agitation in 100-mL closed bottles equipped with a bubbling CO2 outlet. Substrate and product concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Shimadzu HPLC system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Shim-pack SPR-Pb column (7.8 mm × 250 mm, particle size 8 μm; Shimadzu) and an RID-10A refractive index detector (Shimadzu). The HPLC system was operated at 80 °C, with water as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min.

Metabolite analysis by liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

Intracellular metabolites were prepared by leakage-free quenching and cold methanol extraction (Hasunuma et al. 2011). Liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-QqQ-MS) was performed using (+)-10-camphorsulfonic acid as an internal standard. Metabolite extracts were evaporated under vacuum using a Free Zone 2.5 Plus system (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA), and the dried residues were stored at −80 °C until further use. Dried metabolites were dissolved in 50 μL of H2O before LC-QqQ-MS analysis. The LC-QqQ-MS system (LC: Agilent 1200 series; MS, Agilent 6460 with Jet Stream Technology; Agilent Technologies) was controlled using MassHunter Workstation Data Acquisition software (Agilent Technologies), as described previously (Kato et al. 2012). The following conditions were used for LC-QqQ-MS analyses: LC conditions, column, Mastro C18 (Shimadzu GLC Ltd.; 150 × 2.0 mm, particle size, 3 μm); mobile phase, 10 mM tributylamine and 15 mM acetic acid in H2O (A) and methanol (B); flow rate, 0.3 mL/min; gradient curve, 0 % B at 0 min, 0 % B at 8 min, 90 % B at 24 min, 0 % B at 24.1 min, and 0 % B at 30 min; injection volume, 5 μL; column temperature, 35 °C; mass analysis, negative ion mode; nebulizer flow, 55 psi; dry gas flow rate, 10 L/min at 300 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 11 L/min at 380 °C; capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; nozzle voltage, 1.0 kV; and detector voltage, 1.91 kV. Target metabolites were identified by comparing the chromatographic characteristics of sample peaks with those of authentic standards, and peak area was determined using MassHunter Quantitative Analysis ver. B04.00 software.

DNA microarray analysis

Total RNA was obtained after 9 h of fermentation using a Total RNA Isolation Mini Kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration and quality of RNA were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), respectively. cDNA was reverse transcribed and labeled with cyanine 3-CTP using a Low-Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies) for hybridization to S. cerevisiae 4 × 44 k microarrays (Agilent Technologies). Hybridization was performed at 65 °C for 17 h. The arrays were scanned using an Agilent Single-Color DNA Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies). Gene expression levels were normalized per chip. Scan data were analyzed using GeneSpring GX ver. 11.5.1 software (Agilent Technologies). The experiment was performed in triplicate. The accession number of the microarray data was GSE73814.

Results

Construction of xylose-assimilating strains

A laboratory S. cerevisiae strain, YPH499, was used as the host for genetic engineering. The aldose reductase gene GRE3, which converts xylose to xylitol (Johansson et al. 2001), was deleted. Endogenous XKS1, encoding xylulokinase, was overexpressed under control of the TDH3 promoter. This strain was referred to as YΔG/XK. The XI gene xylA from Orpinomyces sp. (Madhavan et al. 2009a, b) was integrated into the genome of the YΔG/XK. Previous studies reported that the rate of XI-catalyzed conversion of xylose to xylulose is very low in recombinant S. cerevisiae strains (van Maris et al. 2007; Matsushika et al. 2009). To increase the activity of XI, multiple copies of xylA were integrated into the δ sequence of YΔG/XK to yield YΔG/XK/XI. In YΔG/XK/XI, PHO13 was disrupted to yield YΔGP/XK/XI.

Determination of XI gene copy number and enzymatic activity

The xylA copy number was determined using qRT-PCR. The xylA copy number of YΔG/XI/XK (15.4 ± 0.7) was the same as that of YΔGP/XI/XK (15.0 ± 0.7). The enzyme activity of XI was 0.98 ± 0.12 and 0.82 ± 0.03 U/mg in YΔG/XI/XK and YΔGP/XI/XK, respectively.

Glucose and xylose fermentation by recombinant strains

The effect of PHO13 disruption on fermentation by the recombinant S. cerevisiae strains YΔG/XK/XI and YΔGP/XK/XI was investigated. After cultivation in YPD medium under aerobic conditions, yeast cells were transferred to YP medium containing 50 g/L glucose or 50 g/L xylose as the sole carbon source to initiate fermentation under oxygen-limited conditions.

During glucose fermentation, there was no difference in the glucose consumption rate or volumetric ethanol productivity between the two strains (Fig. 1). In contrast, during xylose fermentation, YΔGP/XK/XI demonstrated a higher xylose consumption rate (2.08 g/L/h) than YΔG/XK/XI (1.76 g/L/h) (Fig. 2; Table 1). Furthermore, the volumetric ethanol productivity of YΔGP/XK/XI was 1.5-fold higher than that of YΔG/XK/XI. The ethanol yield to theoretical carbon recovery yield (conversion ratio of 51.14 g ethanol from 100 g sugars was defined theoretically as 100 % carbon recovery yield) was 80.3 and 86.8 % in YΔG/XK/XI and YΔGP/XK/XI, respectively. These data indicate that disruption of PHO13 has a positive impact on ethanol production from xylose in the XI-based strain. The concentration of YΔG/XK/XI cells remained nearly constant during xylose fermentation, whereas the density of YΔGP/XK/XI cells increased significantly (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Oxygen-limited fermentation of glucose by a YΔG/XK/XI and b YΔGP/XK/XI. Glucose (diamonds), ethanol (squares), glycerol (triangles). Data are averages from three independent experiments

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Oxygen-limited fermentation of xylose by a YΔG/XK/XI and b YΔGP/XK/XI. Xylose (diamonds), ethanol (squares), glycerol (triangles), xylitol (circles). Data are averages from three independent experiments

Table 1

Comparison of xylose fermentation performance of strains YΔG/XK/XI and YΔGP/XK/XI

Strain

Xylose consumption rate (g/L/h)

Volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L/h)

Ethanol yield (%)

Yield on total sugar

Ethanol (g/g-xylose)

Glycerol (g/g-xylose)

Xylitol (g/g-xylose)

YΔG/XK/XI

1.76 ± 0.01

0.57 ± 0.01

80.27 ± 2.59

0.42 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.01

0.01 ± 0.00

YΔGP/XK/XI

2.08 ± 0.21

0.88 ± 0.09

86.84 ± 2.21

0.45 ± 0.02

0.06 ± 0.00

0.02 ± 0.00

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Cell growth during oxygen-limited fermentation. YΔG/XK/XI (diamonds) and YΔGP/XK/XI (squares). Data are averages from three independent experiments

DNA microarray transcriptome analysis during xylose fermentation

DNA microarray analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of PHO13 disruption on global gene expression. RNA was extracted after 9 h of fermentation. The expression of the PPP-associated genes GND1, SOL3, TAL1, RKI1, TKL1, and STB5 was upregulated following PHO13 disruption. With respect to genes involved in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, the expression of ENO1 was upregulated and that of GCR1, PYK2, SIP4, and RDS2 was downregulated. Upregulated expression of the TCA cycle and respiratory chain genes NDE1, ACO1, ACO2, SDH2, IDH1, IDH2, ATP7, ATP19, SDH4, SDH3, CMC2, and ATP15 and downregulation of PYC1 and NDE2 were demonstrated. In ethanol and acetate biosynthesis from pyruvate, the expression of ALD6 and PDC1 was upregulated, while that of ADH2, ALD5, and PDC6 was downregulated (Table 2). Interestingly, the expression of 125 genes involved in the cell cycle was altered by disruption of PHO13 (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2).
Table 2

Changes in gene expression after 9 h of oxygen-limited fermentation of xylose

Gene

Category

Fold change

Annotated function

SOL3

Pentose phosphate pathway

3.96

6-Phosphogluconolactonase

GND1

3.60

6-Phosphogluconatedehydrogenase

TKL1

2.28

Transketolase

STB5

1.97

Transcription factor

TAL1

1.87

Transaldolase

RKI1

1.44

Ribose-5-phosphate ketol-isomerase

ENO1

Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis

1.26

Phosphopyruvate hydratase

RDS2

1.22

Transcription factor

GCR1

1.23

Transcriptional activator

PYK2

1.43

Pyruvate kinase

SIP4

2.05

C6 zinc cluster transcriptional activator

NDE1

Tricarboxylic acid cycle and respiratory chain

2.06

Mitochondrial external NADH dehydrogenase, a type II NAD(P)H

ACO1

2.03

Aconitase

ACO2

1.58

Putative mitochondrial aconitase isozyme

SDH2

1.52

Iron-sulfur protein subunit of succinate dehydrogenase

IDH1

1.40

Subunit of mitochondrial NAD+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase

IDH2

1.40

Subunit of mitochondrial NAD+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase

ATP7

1.32

Subunit d of the stator stalk of mitochondrial F1F0 ATP synthase

ATP19

1.30

Subunit k of the mitochondrial F1F0 ATP synthase

SDH4

1.25

Membrane anchor subunit of succinate dehydrogenase

SDH3

1.24

Cytochrome b subunit of succinate dehydrogenase

CMC2

1.23

Protein of the mitochondrial intermembrane space with a role in respiratory chain complex assembly or maintenance

ATP15

1.22

Epsilon subunit of the F1 sector of mitochondrial F1F0 ATP synthase

PYC1

1.45

Pyruvate carboxylase isoform

NDE2

1.60

Mitochondrial external NADH dehydrogenase, catalyzes the oxidation of cytosolic NADH

ALD6

Ethanol production and utilization

2.51

Cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase

PDC1

1.34

Major of three pyruvate decarboxylase isozymes

ALD5

1.24

Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase

PDC6

1.87

Minor isoform of pyruvate decarboxylase

ADH2

3.20

Glucose-repressible alcohol dehydrogenase II

Fold change (P < 0.05) is the ratio of expression in YΔGP/XK/XI relative to that in YΔG/XK/XI. Italics indicates up-regulated expression in YΔGP/XK/XI

Metabolite analysis using LC-QqQ-MS

Intracellular metabolites were extracted at 3, 6, and 9 h after the initiation of xylose fermentation. YΔGP/XK/XI demonstrated a significantly lower sedoheptulose 7-phosphate (S7P) level than YΔG/XK/XI (Fig. 4). The level of 6-phospho-d-gluconate (6PG) was higher in YΔGP/XK/XI than YΔG/XK/XI. The ATP level was increased in YΔGP/XK/XI.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Intracellular metabolite concentrations in YΔG/XK/XI (YΔG) and YΔGP/XK/XI (YΔGP) after 3 h (white bars), 6 h (gray bars), and 9 h (black bars) of xylose fermentation. Data are averages from three independent experiments. FBP fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, F6P fructose-6-phosphate, 6PG 6-phosphogluconate, Ru5P ribulose-5-phosphate, S7P sedoheptulose-7-phosphate, X5P xylulose-5-phosphate

Discussion

In this study, xylose assimilation by S. cerevisiae was improved by integrating multiple copies of xylA (n = 15) into the yeast chromosome using the δ-integration method in combination with disruption of the PHO13 gene. YΔGP/XK/XI demonstrated a xylose consumption rate of 2.08, 0.88 g/L/h volumetric ethanol productivity, and 86.8 % theoretical ethanol yield (0.45 g-ethanol/g-xylose), whereas the xylose consumption rate, volumetric ethanol productivity, and ethanol yield of the control strain YΔG/XK/XI were 1.76, 0.57 g/L/h, and 80.3 %, respectively (Table 1).

Recently, many metabolic engineering strategies have been employed to improve xylose assimilation by XI-expressing strains (Table 3). For example, Lee et al. (2014) constructed a strain designated SXA-R2P-E, which harbored two copies of the Piromyces xylA variant and overexpressed Scheffersomyces stipitis tal1 and endogenous XKS1 in combination with disruption of GRE3 and PHO13. Adaptive evolution of the SXA-R2P-E strain led to a xylose consumption rate of 0.98 and 0.44 g/g-cell/h specific ethanol productivity in anaerobic fermentation using a bioreactor (Table 3). Zhou et al. (2012) constructed a strain designated H131-A3-ALCS, which harbored multiple copies of Piromyces xylA and overexpressed S. stipitis XYL3 and PPP genes (S. stipitis TAL1 and endogenous TKL1, RPE1, and RKI1) in combination with the introduction of ARG4 and LEU2 for recovery of auxotrophic markers. Adaptive evolution of strain H131-A3-ALCS led to a xylose consumption rate of 1.87 and 0.77 g/g-cell/h specific ethanol productivity in anaerobic fermentation using a bioreactor (Table 3). A number of XI-expressing, xylose-assimilating strains have been constructed, as noted above; however, these strains were constructed by complex gene recombination and adaptive evolution, which can be time-consuming and laborious. Adaptive evolution is widely used for improving xylose assimilation, although it is difficult to reproduce the same strain. In this study, we developed a novel xylose-assimilating strain, YΔGP/XK/XI, by combining δ-integration and PHO13 disruption. YΔGP/XK/XI exhibited a xylose consumption rate of 0.31 and 0.11 g/g-cell/h specific ethanol productivity in oxygen-limited batch fermentation (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of xylose assimilation by XI-harboring recombinant strains

Strain

Description

Adaptation process

Fermentation conditions

Medium

Specific xylose consumption rate (g/g-cell/h)

Specific ethanol productivity (g/g-cell/h)

Ethanol yield (g/g-xylose)

References

YΔG/XK/XI

Orpinimyces xylA, XKS1, ΔGRE3

–

Oxygen-limited batch fermentation in 100-mL bottle

C

0.23

0.08

0.42

This study

YΔGP/XK/XI

Orpinimyces xylA, XKS1, ΔGRE3, ΔPHO13

–

Oxygen-limited batch fermentation in 100-mL bottle

C

0.31

0.11

0.45

This study

SXA-R2P-E

Piromyces xylA variant, Scheffersomyces stipitis tal1, XKS1, ΔGRE3, ΔPHO13, Evolved

Xylose adaptation

Oxygen-limited batch fermentation in 50-mL vial

S

0.14

0.05

NR

Lee et al. (2014)

SXA-R2P-E

Piromyces xylA variant, Scheffersomyces stipitis tal1, XKS1, ΔGRE3, ΔPHO13, Evolved

Xylose adaptation

Anaerobic batch fermentation in bioreactor

S + a. g.

0.98

0.44

0.45

Lee et al. (2014)

H131-A3-ALCS

Piromyces xylA, S. stipitis XYL3, S. stipitis TAL1, TKL1, RPE1, RKI1, ARG4, LEU2, Evolved

Xylose adaptation

Anaerobic batch fermentation in bioreactor

2 × S + a. g.

1.87

0.77

0.41

Zhou et al. (2012)

ADAP8

Orpinimyces xylA, XKS1, SUT1, Evolved

Xylose adaptation

Oxygen-limited batch fermentation in 100-mL bottle

C

NR

0.038

0.48

Madhavan et al. (2009b)

TMB3066

Piromyces xylA, XKS1, TAL1, TKL1, RKI1, RPE1, ΔGRE3

–

Anaerobic batch fermentation in 25-mL serum flask

S + a. g.

0.05

0.02

0.43

Karhumaa et al. (2007)

RWB 217

Piromyces xylA, XKS1, TAL1, TKL1, RKI1, RPE1, ΔGRE3

–

Anaerobic batch fermentation in bioreactor

S + a. g.

1.06

NR

0.43

Kuyper et al. (2005a)

NR not reported, C complex medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone), S synthetic medium (6.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base, appropriate nucleotides and amino acids), a. g. anaerobic growth factors (0.01 g/L ergosterol, 0.4 g/L Tween 80)

The effect of PHO13 disruption on intracellular metabolism of XR/XDH-based strains has been investigated. Kim et al. (2015) reported upregulated expression of PPP and fermentative metabolism (glycolysis and ethanol production) genes (GND1, SOL3, TAL1, GPM1, ENO1, CDC19, ADH1, and ADH5) in an XR/XDH-expressing strain. In contrast, the expression of various genes involved in respiratory metabolism (TCA cycle and ethanol utilization; PYC1, CIT3, ALD4, ADH2, and ACS1) was downregulated by PHO13 disruption. The transcription factor STB5, a zinc-finger protein that upregulates the expression of PPP and NADPH-producing genes under conditions of oxidative stress and NADPH limitation (Larochelle et al. 2006; Hector et al. 2009), was upregulated by PHO13 disruption. The deletion of PHO13 in an XR/XDH-overexpressing strain was shown to improve xylose fermentation (Ni et al. 2007; van Vleet et al. 2008; Shen et al. 2012; Fujitomi et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013; Li et al. 2014). Kim et al. (2013) constructed a PHO13 knockout strain SR7 pho13Δ, which indicate high specific ethanol productivity of 0.25 g/g-cell/h in oxygen limited fermentation. Li et al. (2014) constructed a PHO13 knockout industrial strain NAPX37/ΔPHO13, which also indicates high specific ethanol productivity of 1.67 g/g-cell/h in oxygen limited fermentation. The enhancement of xylose assimilation ability is possibly due to upregulation of the PPP and elimination of the redox imbalance caused by NAD+ reduction by XR and NADPH oxidation by XDH (Kim et al. 2015).

In the present study, the effect of PHO13 disruption on intracellular metabolism of the XI-expressing strain was investigated by transcriptome and metabolome analysis using DNA microarray and LC-QqQ-MS methods, respectively. We revealed that the expression of 12 TCA cycle and respiratory chain genes (NDE1, ACO1, ACO2, SDH2, IDH1, IDH2, ATP7, ATP19, SDH4, SDH3, CMC2, and ATP15) was upregulated (Table 2). The expression of PPP genes (GND1, SOL3, TAL1, RKI1, TKL1, and STB5) was upregulated. 125 genes involved in the cell cycle were dramatically altered by PHO13 disruption (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2). Metabolome analysis demonstrated a decrease in the level of S7P, an increase in the level of 6PG, and accumulation of ATP by PHO13 deletion during xylose fermentation (Fig. 4).

According to previous studies, S. cerevisiae exhibits lower flux of the non-oxidative PPP than S. stipitis (Fiaux et al. 2003; Kötter and Ciriacy 1993) Utilization of S7P would be a rate-limiting step in the non-oxidative PPP (Jin et al. 2005; Johansson and Hahn-Hägerdal 2002; Kötter and Ciriacy 1993). Jin et al. (2003) indicated that the low flux of the non-oxidative PPP is likely due to insufficient supply of ATP required in excess activity of XK reaction. In fact, ATP is not accumulated in YΔG/XK/XI strain in this study (Fig. 4). Overexpression of PPP genes has improved ethanol yield and productivity in recombinant xylose-fermenting yeast strains (Kuyper et al. 2005a; Lu and Jeffries 2007). In the present study, the non-oxidative PPP genes (TKL1, TAL1, RKI1) was upregulated by the deletion of PHO13, which should be the reason of the reduction in S7P pool size (Fig. 4). The oxidative PPP genes (SOL3 and GND1) and STB5 encoding transcription factor was also upregulated by PHO13 deletion. Kim et al. (2015) indicated STB5 upregulated GND1 expression in a pho13Δ mutant. When recombinant xylose-fermenting S. cerevisiae strains assimilate xylose, metabolites produced via the non-oxidative PPP can be converted to 6PG via gluconeogenesis and the oxidative-PPP (Grotkjær et al. 2005; Wasylenko and Stephanopoulos 2015). 6PG is the substrate of GND1p. Since GND1p requires NADP+ as a coenzyme, upregulation of GND1 might cause redox imbalance and accumulate 6PG by depletion of NADP+. Since the oxidative PPP generates CO2, reduced flux of the oxidative PPP might increase ethanol yield from xylose consumed.

Previously, PHO13 disruptants indicated high growth ability on xylose medium (Fujitomi et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013, 2015; Lee et al. 2014; Li et al. 2014; van Vleet et al. 2008). In the present study, YΔGP/XK/XI demonstrated slightly higher cell concentration than the control strain on xylose fermentation (Fig. 3). We found that PHO13 disruption upregulates PPP-gene expression in XI-harboling strain and that transcriptional level of 125 cell cycle genes was altered (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2). NADPH supplied by PPP is required for biosynthetic processes and biomass yield (Blank et al. 2005). Thus, PHO13 should be one of the factors affecting yeast cell growth.

This study is the first to demonstrate that disruption of PHO13 enhances the xylose consumption rate, ethanol productivity, ethanol yield, and cell growth in an XI-expressing, xylose-fermenting yeast strain under oxygen-limited conditions (Fig. 2).

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TB carried out the molecular genetic studies, and drafted the manuscript. TB, TH and AK contributed to the interpretations of the data. TH and AK were responsible for the design of experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, Creation of Innovative Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas (Innovative Bioproduction Kobe) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
(2)
Organization of Advanced Science and Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
(3)
Biomass Engineering Program, RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan

References

  1. Akada R, Kitagawa T, Kaneko S, Toyonaga D, Ito S, Kakihara Y, Hoshida H, Morimura S, Kondo A, Kida K. PCR-mediated seamless gene deletion and marker recycling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2006;23:399–405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank LM, Lehmbeck F, Sauer U. Metabolic-flux and network analysis in fourteen hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5:545–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen DC, Yang BC, Kuo TT. One-step transformation of yeast in stationary phase. Curr Genet. 1992;21:83–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu BCH, Lee H. Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25:425–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. De Preter K, Speleman F, Combaret V, Lunec J, Laureys G, Eussen BHJ, Francotte N, Board J, Pearson ADJ, De Paepe A, Van Roy N, Vandesompele J. Quantification of MYCN, DDX1, and NAG gene copy number in neuroblastoma using a real-time quantitative PCR assay. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:159–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiaux J, Cakar ZP, Sonderegger M, Wüthrich K, Szyperski T, Sauer U. Metabolic-flux profiling of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2:170–80.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fujitomi K, Sanda T, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural. Bioresour Technol. 2012;111:161–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Grotkjær T, Christakopoulos P, Nielsen J, Olsson L. Comparative metabolic network analysis of two xylose fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng. 2005;7:437–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hasunuma T, Sanda T, Yamada R, Yoshimura K, Ishii J, Kondo A. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hector RE, Bowman MJ, Skory CD, Cotta MA. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae YMR315 W gene encodes an NADP(H)-specific oxidoreductase regulated by the transcription factor Stb5p in response to NADPH limitation. N Biotechnol. 2009;26:171–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishii J, Izawa K, Matsumura S, Wakamura K, Tanino T, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. A simple and immediate method for simultaneously evaluating expression level and plasmid maintenance in yeast. J Biochem. 2009;145:701–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin Y, Ni H, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate d-xylulokinase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:495–503.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin Y, Alper H, Yang YT, Stephanopoulos G. Improvement of xylose uptake and ethanol production in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae through an inverse metabolic engineering approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8249–56.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansson B, Christensson C, Hobley T, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Xylulokinase overexpression in two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae also expressing xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase and its effect on fermentation of xylose and lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:4249–55.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B. The non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway controls the fermentation rate of xylulose but not of xylose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3001. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;2:277–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F. Investigation of limiting metabolic steps in the utilization of xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae using metabolic engineering. Yeast. 2005;22:359–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Karhumaa K, Garcia Sanchez R, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F. Comparison of the xylose reductase-xylitol dehydrogenase and the xylose isomerase pathways for xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2007;6:5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kato H, Izumi Y, Hasunuma T, Matsuda F, Kondo A. Widely targeted metabolic profiling analysis of yeast central metabolites. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012;113:665–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim SR, Skerker JM, Kang W, Lesmana A, Wei N, Arkin AP, Jin Y-S. Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57048.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim SR, Xu H, Lesmana A, Kuzmanovic U, Au M, Florencia C, Oh EJ, Zhang G, Kim KH, Jin Y-S. Deletion of PHO13, encoding haloacid dehalogenase type IIA phosphatase, results in upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1601–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kötter P, Ciriacy M. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;38:776–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuyper M, Hartog MMP, Toirkens MJ, Almering MJH, Winkler AA, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005a;5:399–409.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005b;5:925–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Larochelle M, Drouin S, Robert F, Turcotte B. Oxidative stress-activated zinc cluster protein Stb5 has dual activator/repressor functions required for pentose phosphate pathway regulation and NADPH production. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:6690–701.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee S-M, Jellison T, Alper HS. Systematic and evolutionary engineering of a xylose isomerase-based pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient conversion yields. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:122.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Li YC, Gou ZX, Liu ZS, Tang YQ, Akamatsu T, Kida K. Synergistic effects of TAL1 over-expression and PHO13 deletion on the weak acid inhibition of xylose fermentation by industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36:2011–21.Google Scholar
  27. Lu C, Jeffries T. Shuffling of promoters for multiple genes to optimize xylose fermentation in an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6072–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Madhavan A, Tamalampudi S, Ushida K, Kanai D, Katahira S, Srivastava A, Fukuda H, Bisaria VS, Kondo A. Xylose isomerase from polycentric fungus Orpinomyces: gene sequencing, cloning, and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioconversion of xylose to ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009a;82:1067–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Madhavan A, Tamalampudi S, Srivastava A, Fukuda H, Bisaria VS, Kondo A. Alcoholic fermentation of xylose and mixed sugars using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for xylose utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009b;82:1037–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, Sawayama S. Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84:37–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:673–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ni H, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. Transposon mutagenesis to improve the growth of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae on d-xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2061–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Shen Y, Chen X, Peng B, Chen L, Hou J, Bao X. An efficient xylose-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained through adaptive evolution and its global transcription profile. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:1079–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Maris AJA, Winkler AA, Kuyper M, De Laat WTAM, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: xylose isomerase as a key component. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:179–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Vleet JH, Jeffries TW, Olsson L. Deleting the para-nitrophenyl phosphatase (pNPPase), PHO13, in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and ethanol production on d-xylose. Metab Eng. 2008;10:360–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Vleet JH, Jeffries TW. Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:300–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wasylenko TM, Stephanopoulos G. Metabolomic and 13C-metabolic flux analysis of a xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain expressing xylose isomerase. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:470–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Novel strategy for yeast construction using δ-integration and cell fusion to efficiently produce ethanol from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1491–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou H, Cheng J-S, Wang BL, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:611–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bamba et al. 2016

Advertisement