Open Access

Antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from cheeses and yogurts

  • En Yang1, 3,
  • Lihua Fan2Email author,
  • Yueming Jiang1,
  • Craig Doucette2 and
  • Sherry Fillmore2
AMB Express20122:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-48

Received: 21 November 2011

Accepted: 2 August 2012

Published: 10 September 2012

Abstract

The biopreservation of foods using bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated directly from foods is an innovative approach. The objectives of this study were to isolate and identify bacteriocinogenic LAB from various cheeses and yogurts and evaluate their antimicrobial effects on selected spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in vitro as well as on a food commodity.

LAB were isolated using MRS and M17 media. The agar diffusion bioassay was used to screen for bacteriocin or bacteriocin-like substances (BLS) producing LAB using Lactobacillus sakei and Listeria innocua as indicator organisms. Out of 138 LAB isolates, 28 were found to inhibit these bacteria and were identified as strains of Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus thermophilu s, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Eight isolates were tested for antimicrobial activity at 5°C and 20°C against L. innocua, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Erwinia carotovora, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides using the agar diffusion bioassay, and also against Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea and Monilinia frucitcola using the microdilution plate method. The effect of selected LAB strains on L. innocua inoculated onto fresh-cut onions was also investigated.

Twenty percent of our isolates produced BLS inhibiting the growth of L. innocua and/or Lact. sakei. Organic acids and/or H2O2 produced by LAB and not the BLS had strong antimicrobial effects on all microorganisms tested with the exception of E. coli. Ent. faecium, Strep. thermophilus and Lact. casei effectively inhibited the growth of natural microflora and L. innocua inoculated onto fresh-cut onions. Bacteriocinogenic LAB present in cheeses and yogurts may have potential to be used as biopreservatives in foods.

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteria Bacteriocins Bacteriocin-like substance (BLS) Antimicrobials Fresh-cut onions

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are generally recognized as safe (GRAS microorganisms) and play an important role in food and feed fermentation and preservation either as the natural microflora or as starter cultures added under controlled conditions. The preservative effect exerted by LAB is mainly due to the production of organic acids (such as lactic acid) which result in lowered pHs ([Daeschel 1989]). LAB also produce antimicrobial compounds including hydrogen peroxide, CO2, diacetyl, acetaldehyde, D-isomers of amino acids, reuterin and bacteriocins (Cintas et al. [2001]).

Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides that are active against other bacteria, either of the same species (narrow spectrum), or across genera (broad spectrum) (Bowdish et al. [2005]; Cotter et al. [2005]). Bacteriocins may be produced by both gram negative and gram positive bacteria (Savadogo et al. [2006]). In recent years, bacteriocin producing LAB have attracted significant attention because of their GRAS status and potential use as safe additives for food preservation (Diop et al. [2007]). Nisin, produced by Lactococcus lactis, is the most thoroughly studied bacteriocin to date and has been applied as an additive to certain foods worldwide (Delves-Broughton et al. [1996]). Substantial work has been done on the effectiveness of nisin on various spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms such as L. monocytogenes and its application in different food products ([Staszewski and Jagus 2008]; Freitas et al. [2008]; Schillinger et al. [2001]). Other bacteriocins such as pediocin, may also have potential applications in foods, though they are not currently approved as antimicrobial food additives (Naghmouchi et al. [2007]).

Fresh fruits and vegetables harbor various microorganisms, some of which are psychrotrophic. L. monocytogenes is one of the pathogenic bacteria capable of growing at refrigeration temperatures. Moreover, it is also tolerate to acidic pH and salt concentrations up to 10% ([Tasara and Stephan 2006]; Vescovo et al. [2006]). Therefore, it is important to seek biopreservatives that control both spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms including L. monocytogenes. Although several studies have indicated the presence of LAB species with antagonistic activity for improving the quality and safety of meat and dairy products (Gagnaire et al. [2009]; [Stiles and Holzapfel 1997]), few reports have involved fresh produce (Trias et al. [2008a, b]). Since the isolation and screening of microorganisms from natural sources has always been the most powerful means for obtaining useful and genetically stable strains for industrially important products (Ibourahema et al. [2008]), in the prsent study, we isolated and identified bacteriocinogenic LAB from cheeses and yogurts, then further evaluated their antimicrobial effects in vitro and on fresh-cut produce inoculated with L. innocua, a surrogate bacteria for L. monocytogenes.

Materials and methods

Isolation and screening of LAB

LAB were isolated from 7 commercial cheeses: [Tre Stelle® bocconcini cheese (TSB); Tre Stelle® fromage romano cheese (TSR); Saputo® feta cheese (SF); Agropur® signature rondoux pure goat cheese (ASR); Agropur® signature OKA cheese (OKA); Arla® fontina cheese (Arla) and Jarlsberg® firm ripened cheese (JFR)]; plus 3 commercially available yogurts: (Danone, Activia®; Astro® BioBest yogurt; and Bioghurt® Liberte yogurt), and one in- house produced yogurt.

A 25 g sample of cheese was weighed into filtered stomacher bags (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, ON, Canada) and mixed with 225 ml of sterile 0.1% (w/v) peptone water (Fisher Scientific). Samples were blended at 280 rpm for 3 min (400C stomacher circulator, Seward, England). For yogurt samples, 1 ml of sample was added to 99 ml of sterile 0.1% peptone water. All samples were serially diluted and 50uL of each dilution was spiral plated onto de Man, Rogosa and Sharp (MRS) agar, (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and M17 agar (Oxoid). MRS plates were incubated at 37°C under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions for 48 h and M17 plates at 44°C under anaerobic condition for 48 h. All gram positive, catalase negative (3% v/v H2O2) isolates were purified and observed under a light microscope. All isolates were coded and stored in MRS or M17 broth containing equal amounts of 30% sterile glycerol at - 80°C.

Antimicrobial activity and enzymatic testing of bacteriocin producing LAB

The agar diffusion bioassay described by Herreros et al. ([2005]) was used to screen for bacteriocin producing LAB among the 138 isolates. L. innocua (ATCC 33090TM) and Lact. sakei (ATCC 15521TM) were used as indicator bacteria. L. innocua was incubated overnight in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI, Fisher Scientific, ON, Canada) at 37°C and Lact. sakei was cultured anaerobically in MRS broth at 37°C.

One ml of each indicator organism (5 × 105 cfu ml-1) was inoculated into 15 ml of semisolid BHI or MRS agar (BHI or MRS broth plus 0.7% bacteriological agar) maintained at 50°C and then poured into a petri dish. After solidification, three wells (5 mm diameter) were cut and 35 μl of cell-free supernatant (CFS) from each LAB isolate and appropriately adjusted was added to each well. CFS were prepared as follows: one ml of frozen LAB isolate was cultured overnight in 20 ml MRS or M17 broth then 1 ml culture was sub-cultured overnight in 20 ml MRS broth. Cells were removed by centrifuging at 14,000 g for 5 min (Sorvall RC6 PLUS, Thermo-electron Corporation, Asheville, NC, USA). The supernatant was filtered through a sterile 0.22 μm syringe filter (Chromatographic Specialties Inc., ON, Canada) and 35 μl of the unadjusted aliquot of CFS was added to the first well. The remaining CFS was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 1 mol l-1 NaOH in order to rule out possible inhibition effects due to organic acids. 35 μl of the pH adjusted CFS was filtered and added to the second well. The neutralized CFS was then treated with 1 mg ml-1 of catalase (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, USA) at 25°C for 30 min to eliminate the possible inhibitory action of H2O2 and filtered, then was placed in the third well. If inhibitions zones were found in the third well, the isolates were considered to be able to produce BLS.

The BHI or MRS plates were incubated at 37°C aerobically for 24 h or at 37°C anaerobically for 24 h, respectively. Inhibition zones were measured using an electronic caliper with digital display (MastercraftMD, Miami, FL, USA). Screenings for bacteriocin producing LAB were repeated twice for each isolate.

To confirm production of a proteinaceous compound, CFS displaying antimicrobial potential after acid neutralization and H2O2 elimination were treated with 1 mg ml-1 of proteolytic enzymes, including proteinase K (33 U mg-1), α-chymotripsin (66 U mg-1), and trypsin (105 U mg-1) (Sigma- Aldrich Corporation, USA) at 37°C for 2 h (Bonadè et al. [2001], Herreros et al. [2005]). Antimicrobial activity of treated CFS was determined by the agar diffusion bioassay as described above.

Identification of BLS producing LAB using 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to identify unknown bacteriocin producing LAB strains based on the method of Abnous et al. ([2009]). Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from isolates using the UltraCleanTM Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MO Bio laboratories, Inc., Carlsbas, CA, USA). Universal primers F44 (5’RGTTYGATYMTGGCTCAG-3’) and R1543 (5’-GNNTACCTTKTTACG ACTT-3’) (Abnous et al., [2009]) were used for the amplification of the 16S rRNA gene by PCR. PCR reactions were carried out using a Biometra thermal cycler (Montreal Biotech Inc., Kirkland, QC, Canada) with the following cycle parameters: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 52°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min. A final elongation step was performed at 72°C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8% w/v) and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.

The PCR products were cloned into the psc-A-amp/kan vector using the StrataClone PCR Cloning kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and transformed into E. coli according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Transformants were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 100 μg ml-1 ampicillin. Plasmids were extracted and purified from selected E. coli clones with the UltraClean TM mini plasmid prep kit (MO Bio Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and then sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit. A homology search of the sequences was conducted using the BLAST program at the NCBI database.

Thermal stability of bacteriocins produced by LAB isolates

Based on identified LAB species, isolation source and the size of inhibition zones, eight LAB isolates were chosen for thermal stability tests. The pH adjusted and H2O2 eliminated CFS described above were treated at 80 and 100°C for both 60 and 90 min, and at 121°C for 15 min. pH adjusted and H2O2 eliminated CFS without any heat treatments served as a controls. Residual antimicrobial activity of heat-treated CFS was determined by the agar diffusion bioassay compared to the control using L. innocua as the indicator bacteria.

Antibacterial effects of LAB isolates in vitro

The antibacterial effects of eight selected LAB isolates on six common food borne pathogens or spoilage organisms at 5 and 20°C were investigated using the agar diffusion bioassay described above. Targeted indicator organisms and their respective media used were as follows: L. innocua (BHI, DifcoTM, Spark, MD), E. coli K-12 (ATCC 10798TM) (Tryptic Soy Broth, DifcoTM), B. cereus (ATCC 14579TM) (Nutrient Broth (NB), DifcoTM), Ps. fluorescens (A7B) (NB), Erw. carotovora (ATCC 15713TM) (NB) and Leuc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (ATCC 8293TM) (MRS, DifcoTM). All strains were cultured aerobically for 24 h at their optimal growth temperatures: 26°C for Erw. carotovora, Ps. fluorescens and Leuc. mesenteroides; 30°C for B. cereus; and 37°C for E. coli and L. innocua. LAB isolates were sub-cultured and the CFS was prepared as previously described. Following inoculation, plates were incubated at 5 and 20°C for 7 d and 24 h, respectively. Inhibition zones were measured as before.

Antifungal effects of LAB isolates in vitro

The microdilution method described by Lavermicocca et al. ([2003]) with some modifications was used to test the eight LAB isolates against P. expansum (Pex 03–10.1), B. cinerea (B94-b) and M. fructicola (Mof 03–25) at 5 and 20°C. Fungi were obtained from the culture collection at our Research Centre, AAFC. The stock cultures were stored as spore or mycelial suspensions in 15% glycerol (v/v) at −80°C. Conidia of P. expansum were collected from 4 d-old cultures grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25°C. Conidia of B. cinerea were collected from 12 d-old cultures grown under a 12 h light/dark cycle on Pseudomonas Agar F at 22°C. Conidia of M. fructicola were collected from 12 d-old cultures grown on modified V-8TM medium at 25°C. Using sterile distilled water, the density of spore suspensions were diluted to 2 × 105 spores ml-1 as determined using a haemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, PA, USA).

Microdilution tests were performed in sterile 96-well micro dilution plates (Costar 3370, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). 200 μl of test solution consisting of 185 μl LAB CFS inoculated with 15 μl of conidial suspension was dispensed into the wells. Microdilution plates were incubated at either 20 or 5°C and the optical density (OD) at 580 nm was recorded at specific time intervals using a microtiter plate reader/ spectrophotometer (Spectra MAX 190, Molecular Devices, CA, USA). For the 20°C plates, OD values were measured at 0, 24, 40, 48 or 72 h, while at 5°C, they were measured at 0, 48, 72, 96 or 120 h. For each fungus, both positive controls containing 185 μl MRS broth and 15 μl conidial suspension and negative controls containing 185 μl LAB CFS and 15 μl dead conidial suspension were prepared and monitored. Experiments were repeated three times.

In vivo testing of selected LAB on microflora naturally occurring on fresh-cut onions

Ent. faecium, Strep. thermophilu s and Lact. casei were chosen for in vivo tests. Fresh-cut yellow onions processed at a commercial facility were supplied by Nova Agri Inc. (Canning, NS). Ent. faecium and Lact. casei were incubated anaerobically in MRS broth at 37°C for 16 h. Strep. thermophilu s was incubated anaerobically in M17 broth at 43°C for 16 h. LAB were sub-cultured twice and then centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. Pellets of LAB were washed using sterile distilled water, centrifuged, re-suspended and inoculated onto the batches of diced onions using a calibrated TLC sprayer to give a final concentration of 5 × 105 cfu g-1. Diced onions inoculated with sterile distilled water served as a control. Samples were left to dry for 10 min, then 100 g was transferred to food grade bags (Golden Eagle-VH-62 190) and sealed using an electric sealer (FoodSaver V2490, Tilia International Inc. US). The densities of naturally occurring (indigenous) LAB, Pseudomonas sp., yeasts and moulds, Listeria sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated following 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 d of storage at 4°C. LAB were cultured anaerobically on MRS Agar at 37°C for 48 h; Pseudomonas sp. on Pseudomonas selective medium at 30°C for 48 h; yeasts and moulds on PDA supplemented with chloramphenicol (DifcoTM) at 25°C for 48 h; and Enterobacteriaceae on Violet Red Bile Agar (VRBG)(DifcoTM) at 37°C for 48 h. Colonies were counted using an aCOLyte automated colony counter (Synbiosis, Cambridge, England) and expressed as cfu g-1 of diced onions.

In vivo testing of selected LAB on L. innocua inoculated on fresh-cut onions

L. innocua was sub-cultured into BHI broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The selected LAB strains and inoculation procedures were the same as described above. The final density of L. innocua inoculated on fresh-cut onions was 5 × 103 cfu g-1. After drying for 10 min, the LAB species were inoculated respectively onto the fresh-cut onions at a density of 5 × 105 cfu g-1. A batch of fresh-cut onions inoculated with L. innocua alone was used as the control. Samples (100 g/ bag) were stored at 4°C and Listeria sp. and LAB were enumerated following 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 d. Listeria sp. was cultured on Listeria selective medium at 35°C for 48 h and LAB on MRS agar at 37°C for 48 h anaerobically.

Statistical analysis

The initial screening for bacteriocin producing LAB from 138 LAB isolates was repeated twice. For antimicrobial tests, a three repetition split-split plot design was used with the eight LAB isolates on the main plot versus the six bacteria (or three fungi) on the sub plot, which was then split into two temperatures (5 and 20°C). For the in vivo testing, non-inoculation or inoculation of L. innocua was designed on the main plot with the three LAB strains used to investigate the treatment effect on naturally occurring microflora and introduced L. innocua on the onions. The sub plot was represented by sample removal at days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA directive and standard errors of mean (SEM) option of GenStat® (12th Edition, VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead UK, 2009). The results of a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) were discussed in terms of component scores.

Results

Isolation of potential LAB and screening for bacteriocin producing LAB

A total of 160 potential LAB strains were isolated from 11 different cheeses and yogurts. Eighty seven isolates were obtained from MRS agar and 73 from M17 medium. Of these, 138 were gram positive and catalase negative, and were cocci or rod in shape. Twenty percent of isolates showed antimicrobial activity against at least one indicator that is presumed to be attributable to BLS, which was determined after the neutralization of pH, and the elimination of H2O2 from the CFS (Table 1). All 28 LAB isolates had BLS inhibitory effect on L. innocua, while BLS produced by 20 isolates were effective against Lact. sakei.
Table 1

Inhibition zones (mm) of 28 LAB isolated from commercial cheeses and yogurts using L. innocua and Lact. sakei as indicator bacteria

Isolate

GenBank accession number

L. innocua

Lact. sakei

  

Controla

-Acidb

BLSc

Control

-Acid

BLS

Arla-1

JX275802

8.65 ± 0.23d

7.10 ± 0.15

5.82 ± 0.09

5.12 ± 0.01

5.97 ± 0.01

5.74 ± 0.01

Arla-10

JX275803

8.96 ± 0.30

8.15 ± 0.21

6.47 ± 0.03

6.51 ± 0.18

5.59 ± 0.12

5.50 ± 0.03

Arla-11

JX275804

8.83 ± 0.14

7.71 ± 0.09

6.41 ± 0.06

5.76 ± 0.07

6.90 ± 0.05

6.31 ± 0.10

Arla-12

JX275805

9.26 ± 0.09

8.57 ± 0.10

6.47 ± 0.14

5.82 ± 0.18

6.67 ± 0.10

5.83 ± 0.15

Arla-14

JX275806

9.33 ± 0.05

8.40 ± 0.08

5.87 ± 0.04

5.98 ± 0.17

7.22 ± 0.32

7.41 ± 0.14

Arla-16

JX275807

8.47 ± 0.07

7.84 ± 0.20

5.81 ± 0.17

5.09 ± 0.01

5.98 ± 0.03

5.15 ± 0.01

Arla-17

JX275808

8.52 ± 0.10

7.82 ± 0.12

5.57 ± 0.38

--e

--

--

Arla-18

JX275809

9.28 ± 0.08

8.84 ± 0.08

6.09 ± 0.10

6.94 ± 0.08

8.49 ± 0.07

7.95 ± 0.10

ASR-1

JX275810

9.02 ± 0.03

7.88 ± 0.07

5.54 ± 0.03

6.85 ± 0.11

7.68 ± 0.07

6.52 ± 0.07

ASR-5

JX275811

10.02 ± 0.10

8.99 ± 0.18

6.13 ± 0.06

7.16 ± 0.04

6.57 ± 0.03

5.88 ± 0.32

ASR-6

JX275812

10.38 ± 0.07

9.50 ± 0.15

6.59 ± 0.06

8.30 ± 0.10

8.59 ± 0.14

8.06 ± 0.07

ASR-7

JX275813

8.89 ± 0.12

7.21 ± 0.15

5.97 ± 0.01

--

--

--

JFR-1

JX275814

8.62 ± 0.01

7.82 ± 0.16

6.01 ± 0.25

5.10 ± 0.01

5.82 ± 0.01

5.51 ± 0.09

JFR-3

JX275815

8.93 ± 0.27

7.42 ± 0.19

6.34 ± 0.07

--

--

--

JFR-4

JX275816

9.31 ± 0.07

7.74 ± 0.11

5.46 ± 0.04

--

--

--

JFR-5

JX275817

8.22 ± 0.13

7.18 ± 0.05

5.93 ± 0.14

--

--

--

TSB-8

JX275827

10.91 ± 0.15

9.32 ± 0.14

6.28 ± 0.08

10.15 ± 0.11

9.88 ± 0.16

8.90 ± 0.16

OKA-1

JX275818

9.13 ± 0.12

8.18 ± 0.01

6.23 ± 0.01

--

--

--

OKA-3

JX275819

8.47 ± 0.20

7.36 ± 0.31

5.42 ± 0.01

--

--

--

OKA-4

JX275820

8.33 ± 0.03

7.59 ± 0.01

5.96 ± 0.06

--

--

--

OKA-8

JX275821

8.84 ± 0.19

8.24 ± 0.26

5.93 ± 0.07

5.97 ± 0.12

6.14 ± 0.17

5.68 ± 0.09

OKA-9

JX275822

8.60 ± 0.10

7.69 ± 0.13

6.16 ± 0.03

5.30 ± 0.01

6.10 ± 0.07

6.21 ± 0.28

OKA-14

JX275823

10.12 ± 0.20

9.08 ± 0.30

6.03 ± 0.09

8.31 ± 0.09

8.65 ± 0.15

8.01 ± 0.10

OKA-15

JX275824

9.89 ± 0.16

9.60 ± 0.08

6.55 ± 0.08

8.75 ± 0.05

9.15 ± 0.20

8.76 ± 0.13

OKA-19

JX275825

11.24 ± 0.06

9.62 ± 0.10

6.54 ± 0.11

8.78 ± 0.06

9.05 ± 0.22

8.67 ± 0.13

OKA-22

JX275826

9.39 ± 0.04

8.52 ± 0.07

5.92 ± 0.14

7.94 ± 0.15

8.22 ± 0.12

8.43 ± 0.25

Yog-3 L

JX275800

10.42 ± 0.16

9.26 ± 0.03

6.11 ± 0.08

8.36 ± 0.24

8.65 ± 0.12

7.79 ± 0.13

Yog-3S

JX275801

10.65 ± 0.09

9.14 ± 0.10

6.17 ± 0.03

8.23 ± 0.09

8.83 ± 0.13

8.12 ± 0.15

a CFS of LAB isolates without any treatment.

b CFS with pH neutralized to 6.0.

c CFS with pH neutralized to 6.0 and H2O2 eliminated.

d Means ± standard deviation of two replicate experiments.

e No inhibition detected.

The BLS from all 28 LAB isolates lost their anti-listerial activity following treatment with proteinase K, α-chymotripsin and/or trypsin (Table 2). However, when Lact. sakei was used as an indicator, the BLS produced by the different LAB stains had varying activity following treatment with these enzymes. Nevertheless, the lost antimicrobial ability following treatment with proteolytic enzymes indicated the proteinaceous nature of the BLS.
Table 2

The effect of α-chymotripsin, protease and trypsin treatment on inhibitory activity of BLS produced by the 28 LAB isolates against L. innocua and Lact. sakei

Isolates

controla

L. innocua(indicator)

control

Lact. sakei(indicator)

  

Enzyme treatment

 

Enzyme treatment

  

α-chymotripsin

protease

trypsin

 

α-chymotripsin

protease

trypsin

Arla-1

+b

--c

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-10

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-11

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-12

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-14

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-16

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Arla-17

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

Arla-18

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

ASR-1

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

ASR-5

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

ASR-6

+

--

--

--

+

--

+

--

ASR-7

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

JFR-1

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

JFR-3

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

JFR-4

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

JFR-5

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

TSB-8

+

--

--

--

+

--

+

+

OKA-1

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

OKA-3

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

OKA-4

+

--

--

--

n.d

n.d

n.d

n.d

OKA-8

+

--

--

--

+

+

--

+

OKA-9

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

OKA-14

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

+

OKA-15

+

--

--

--

+

--

+

+

OKA-19

+

--

--

--

+

--

+

+

OKA-22

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

--

Yog-3 L

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

+

Yog-3S

+

--

--

--

+

--

--

+

a Control = pH-neutralized and H2O2-eliminated CFS without addition of enzymes.

b Inhibition zones present.

c No inhibition zone.

d n.d. = not determined.

Identification of LAB isolates using 16S rRNA gene sequences

Near-full length sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for the 28 bacteriocin producing LAB identified the isolates as follows: 24 strains of Ent. faecium, two strains of Strep. thermophilus, one strain of Lact. casei and one strain of Lact. sakei subsp. sakei.

Thermal stability of BLS following heat treatments

The BLS produced by the eight selected LAB isolates were heat-treated at 80 and 100°C for 60 and 90 min, respectively. BLS were thermal stable at these heat conditions above as their inhibitory effects against L. innocua were retained (Table 3). However, BLS were sensitive to autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min displaying either smaller or no inhibition zones compared to the control. Isolates Strep. thermophilus (ASR-1) and Lact. casei (JFR-5) totally lost their anti-listerial activity subsequent to exposure to 121°C for 15 min.
Table 3

Thermal stability of BLS produced by the selected LAB following various heat treatments ( L. innocua was used as an indictor bacterium)

Anti-listerial activity of BLS after heat treatment

Isolates

CFS*

BLS**

80°C, 60 min

80°C, 90 min

100°C, 60 min

100°C, 90 min

121°C, 15 min

Arla-18

+++a

++b

++

++

++

++

++

ASR-1

+++

++

++

++

++

+

--d

ASR-6

+++

++

++

++

++

++

++

JFR-1

+++

++

++

++

++

++

+

JFR-5

++

+ c

+

+

+

+

--

TSB-8

+++

++

++

++

++

++

+

OKA-14

+++

++

++

++

++

++

+

Yog-3S

+++

++

++

++

++

++

+

a Inhibitory zone >10 mm.

b Inhibitory zone = 7–10 mm.

c Inhibitory zone = 5–7 mm.

d No inhibitory zone.

* CFS: cell free supernatant from LAB culture.

** BLS: CFS following the pH neutralization and H2O2 elimination.

Action of LAB isolates against six bacteria in vitro

The CFS from the eight LAB isolates significantly inhibited the growth of all bacteria tested (p < 0.05) at 5 and 20°C with the exception of E. coli (Table 4). Neutralized CFS from isolates Arla-18, ASR-6, JFR-1, OKA-14, and Yog-3S continued to inhibit the growth of Leuc. mesenterioides at 5°C. After pH neutralization and H2O2 elimination, the CFS from the eight LAB isolates had inhibitory effects only on L. innocua but not the other test bacteria suggesting that organic acids and /or H2O2 produced by LAB had strong antimicrobial effects on bacteria tested.
Table 4

Effect of 8 selected LAB isolates on various bacterial species in vitro

 

Ps. fluoresecens

B. cereus

Erw. carotovora

Leuc. mesenteroides

Leuc. mesenteroides

L. innocua

L. innocua

L. innocua

Isolates

(Controla)

(Control)

(Control)

(Control)

(−Acidb)

(Control)

(−Acid)

(BLSc)

 

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

5°C

20°C

Arla-18

7.95

9.50

9.17

8.12

10.80

8.57

5.60

5.26

5.48

--d

16.75

15.58

14.96

14.76

9.61

11.15

ASR-1

8.85

9.87

8.53

8.13

10.44

7.53

5.47

5.18

--

--

15.31

12.46

14.33

11.46

8.97

8.71

ASR-6

8.29

10.23

9.50

8.17

10.45

8.12

5.91

5.35

5.68

--

16.87

14.86

14.95

13.80

9.24

11.16

JFR-1

7.54

9.60

9.52

8.11

10.80

8.93

5.71

5.36

5.57

--

17.27

14.42

15.84

13.23

9.64

11.38

JFR-5

9.42

10.42

10.09

9.02

11.24

9.42

--

--

--

--

15.30

12.65

14.18

11.71

7.92

9.29

OKA-14

8.09

9.26

9.43

8.24

11.23

8.65

5.78

5.30

5.49

--

16.84

14.27

15.42

13.55

8.54

10.41

TSB-8

8.61

9.81

8.84

7.36

9.45

8.80

5.45

5.21

--

--

18.77

13.62

17.34

13.10

8.60

8.49

Yog-3S

8.02

9.96

10.35

8.60

11.62

9.37

5.64

5.47

5.46

--

16.76

14.14

15.12

13.33

8.62

11.07

SEM

0.62

0.62

0.63

0.63

0.58

0.58

0.10

0.10

0.81

 

0.90

0.90

8.45

8.45

0.87

0.87

a CFS without any treatment.

b CFS with pH neutralized to 6.0.

c CFS with pH neutralized to 6.0 and H2O2 eliminated.

d No inhibition zone shown.

Inhibition zones (mm) were determined using an agar diffusion assay when target bacteria were used as indicator organisms.

In conducting a principal components analysis, we intended to figure out that the principal component had as high a variance as possible (accounted for as much of the variability in our data as possible). It was found that score 1 was a contrast between L. innocua (control), L. innocua (pH neutralized), Leuc. mesenteroides (pH neutralized), Erw. carotovora (control), B. cereus (control) vs Ps. fluoresecens (control) (Figure 1). A high score 1 was dominated by the values (inhibitory zones) at 5°C except for Strep. thermophilus and Lact. casei. All the CFS produced by Ent. faecium (Arla-18, ASR-6, JFR-1, OKA-14, and Yog-3S) had a similar antibacterial activity towards all the bacteria tested at both temperatures. The effects of untreated CFS and neutralized CFS from the eight LAB isolates on L. innocua highly correlated at 5 and 20°C.
Figure 1

Principal component analysis (a biplot of antibacterial data of CFS produced by 8 selected bacteriocinogenic LAB cultured at 5 and 20°C). Indicator organisms included: Leuc. mesenteroides CFS, untreated (), Leuc. mesenteroides CFS, pH neutralized (), B. cereus CFS, untreated (), L. innocua CFS, untreated (Δ), L. innocua CFS, pH neutralized (■), L. innocua CFS, pH neutralized and H2O2 eliminated (□), Erw. carotovora CFS, untreated (♦), and Ps. fluorescens CFS, untreated (). H-20°C; L-5°C; 1-Arla-18 (Ent. faecium); 2-ASR-1 (Strep. thermophilus); 3-ASR-6 (Ent. faecium); 4-JFR-1 (Ent. faecium); 5-JFR-5 (Lact. casei); 6-TSB-8 (Strep. thermophilus); 7-OKA-14 (Ent. faecium); 8-Yog-3S (Ent. faecium).

Action of LAB isolates on three fungi in vitro

No significant difference among the eight LAB isolates was observed with respect to inhibition of spore germination of M. fructicola, B. cinerea and P. expansum at either 5 or 20°C (p > 0.05). Therefore, data for antifungal ability of untreated CFS, pH neutralized CFS, and pH neutralized and H2O2 eliminated CFS from the eight isolates were averaged, respectively, and compared to the positive controls. At 5 and 20°C, untreated CFS was the most effective at inhibiting fungal growth compared to their controls (Figure 2). Neutralized CFS also had an inhibitory effect on the growth of these fungi (p <0.001). However, pH neutralized and H2O2 eliminated CFS showed no significant effect on fungal growth at 20°C (Figure 2a1, 2b1, and 2c1). Similar results were found at 5°C as the CFS, but not the BLS, produced by the eight LAB were effective in controlling the fungal growth (Figure 2a2, 2b2, and 2c2).
Figure 2

Influence of BLS-producing LAB on fungal growth (a1, a2 =M. fructicola at 20 or 5°C ; b1, b2 =B. cinerea at 20 or 5°C; c1, c2 =P. expansum at 20 or 5°C) after incubation at 20°C for 72 h or 5°C for 120 h. Positive control = Fungal spores grown in MRS broth (), fungal spores in untreated LAB CFS (), fungal spores in pH neutralized CFS (), fungal spores in CFS after pH neutralization and H2O2 elimination (Δ). The vertical bar represents standard errors of mean.

Effect of selected LAB on microflora naturally occurring on fresh- cut onions

Three LAB species inoculated on fresh-cut onions significantly inhibited Pseudomonas sp. (p = 0.02) (Figure 3a) and lactose-positive (Lac+) Enterobacteriaceae (p = 0.042) (Figure 3b) during 12 d when stored at 5°C compared to non-LAB inoculated controls. On day 12, Lac+Enterobacteriaceae increased to 4.5 log cfu g-1 on control samples while levels of 0.3, 2.2 and 1.1 log cfu g-1 were obtained in Strep. thermophilu s, Lact. casei and Ent. facium treated samples, respectively. However, no significant differences were found in yeast and mould levels between LAB inoculated and control samples (Figure 3c). Moreover, no dramatic decrease in the LAB inoculated on the fresh-cut onions was observed over the 12 d storage period (Figure 3d) and no naturally occurring Listeria sp. was detected in this study.
Figure 3

Influence of BLS-producing LAB on the growth of naturally occurring microorganisms. Pseudomonas sp. (a), lactose-positive Enterobacteriaceae (b), yeasts and moulds (c), and LAB viability (d) on fresh-cut onion during 12 d storage at 5°C. Fresh- cut onions without LAB inoculation (), inoculated with Strep. thermophilu s (), inoculated with Lact. casei (), inoculated with Ent. facium (Δ). Fresh-cut onions were inoculated with LAB to a density of 5 × 105 cfu g-1. The vertical bar represents standard errors of mean.

Listeria challenge test on fresh-cut onions

The initial density of L. innocua subsequent to their introduction onto fresh-cut onions was 3.2 log cfu g-1 on day 0. During the following 12 d at 5°C, the growth of L. innocua was significantly inhibited by the LAB (p = 0.042, Figure 4a) as its levels were reduced by 1.0, 1.6, and 1.6 log cfu g-1 in samples treated with Strep. thermophilu s, Lact. casei and Ent. faecium, respectively. In contrast, levels of LAB inoculated on the fresh-cut onions remained at the initial inoculation level of 5 × 105 cfu g-1 over the 12 d storage at 5°C (Figure 4b).
Figure 4

The viability of L. innocua (a) and LAB (b) inoculated onto fresh-cut onions during 12 d storage at 5°C. Control (in Figure 4a) = fresh-cut onions inoculated with L. innocua at 5 × 103 cfu g-1 (); control (in Figure 4b) = LAB naturally occurring on fresh-cut onions (). Samples inoculated with Strep. thermophilu s at 5 × 105 cfu g-1 after introduction of L. innocua (), samples inoculated with Lact. casei at 5 × 105 cfu g-1 after introduction of L. innocua (), samples inoculated with Ent. faecium at 5 × 105 cfu g-1 after introduction of L. innocua (Δ). The vertical bar represents standard errors of mean.

Discussion

In the present work we isolated, identified and characterized bacteriocinogenic LAB indigenous to cheese and yogurt and explored their potential as biopreservatives. Two types of media were chosen for the isolation of LAB. First, MRS was used as a medium for LAB which gave a general scope of the flora present in the samples ([Reuter 1985]). M17 agar was also used as a selective medium for the isolation of Streptococci sp. Twenty percent of our isolates produced BLS effective against L. innocua and 16S rRNA gene sequencing determined that these isolates belonged to four LAB species. ([Sharpe 2009]) reported detecting 8.7% bacteriocinogenic strains among 92 LAB isolated from fresh-cut vegetable products, whereas Sezer and Güven ([2009]) screened 12,700 LAB isolates from milk and meat products and found only 35 exhibited bacteriocin production. Therefore, the choice of food source and media are important for the successfully isolation of bacteriocinogenic LAB.

Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to identify the 28 bacteriocinogenic LAB isolates, we found that the genus Enterococcus was predominant representing 85.7% of the isolates. Another 7.1% were Streptococcus sp. whereas the other 7.1% were Lactobacillus sp. Furthermore, all the Enterococcus sp. were identified as Ent. faecium, which was also found to be the most frequently isolated species in cured and semi-cured cheese (Cogan et al. [1997]). López-Díaz et al. ([2000]) found that 40.4% of nearly 500 strains isolated from Valdeón cheese were Enterococcus sp.

Bacteriocins can be broken down by some proteolytic enzymes leading to a loss in their antimicobial activity. In our study, we used L. innocua or Lact. sakei as indicators, and the BLS produced by different LAB stains had various inhibitory effects following treatment with proteolytic enzymes (Table 2). Similar behavior was observed by Khalil et al. ([2009]) with a Bacillus megaterium 19 strain isolated from a mixture of fermented vegetable wastes. They found that pepsin and trypsin treatment inhibited the bacteriocin activity against Staphylococcus aureus more than Salmonella typhimurium. Cherif et al. ([2001]) used pepsin, papain, trypsin, chymotrypsin, proteinase K, lysozyme, catalase, DNase and RNase to treat thuricin 7, a bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis BNG 1.7. They found that the inhibitory activity was only susceptible to proteinase K.

The thermal stability at 80 and 100°C (up to 90 min) (Table 3) of BLS produced by our bacteriocinogenic LAB isolates may constitute an advantage for potential use as biopreservatives in combination with thermal processing in order to preserve food products. However, it should be noted that the antimicrobial effect of these BLS on L. innocua and/or Lact. sakei was markedly decreased or completely lost after treatment at 121°C for 15 min. [Todorov and Dicks (2009]) reported that bacteriocin ST44AM remained stable at 25, 30, 45, 60 and 100°C for 120 min. However, the activity of this bacteriocin against L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119 was reduced from 3.3 × 106 AU ml-1 to 4.1 × 105 AU ml-1 after exposure at 121°C for 20 min. Similar results were reported for a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus CA44 (Joshi et al. [2006]) and also thuricin 7 from B. thuringiensis BMG1.7 (Cherif et al. [2001]).

In the present study, eight BLS producing LAB isolates were tested for their antimicrobial effects on three gram-negative, and three gram-positive bacteria, as well as three common spoilage fungi. The results showed that untreated CFS inhibited all test bacteria and fungi except for E. coli. However, after pH neutralization and H2O2 elimination, the CFS inhibited only L. innocua. Similar results were reported by [Sharpe (2009]) as they found that the BLS produced by Lact. lactis and Ent. faecium were able to control Lact. sakei and L. innocua. However, the strong antimicrobial effects associated with Lact. lactis and Ent. faecium in our study appeared to be a direct result of the organic acids and the H2O2 present in the CFS rather than the BLS. In other research, the antimicrobial activity of 12 enterococci strains was confirmed by Hajikhani et al. ([2007]), showing that Ps. aeruginosa and Proteus vulgaris were sensitive to compounds produced by enterococci but E. coli and Yersinia enterocolitica were not affected. Trias et al. ([2008a] ) treated apple wounds and lettuce cuts with the LAB strains resulting in reduced counts of Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli by 1 to 2 log cfu g-1, whereas the growth of L. monocytogenes was completely inhibited. Cheikhyoussef et al. ([2010]) investigated bifidin I from Bifidobacterium infantis BCRC 14602, and reported an increase in bacteriocin activity from 2. 6 × 102 AU mg-1 for neutralized CFS to 3.7 × 105 AU mg-1 for the purified bacteriocin. Simova et al. ([2009]) achieved a 105 -fold increase in bacteriocin activity after a single peak was assessed upon C2/C18 reversed-phase liquid chromatography purification. The relative low concentration of bacteriocin in the CFS likely contributed to the BLS not being able to inhibit all bacteria and fungi examined in this study. Further investigation is needed to establish the method of direct use of LAB as protective cultures or that of purified bacteriocins on foods.

It has been hypothesized that organic acids act on the cytoplasmic membrane by neutralizing its electrochemical potential and increasing its permeability, thus leading to bacteriostasis and eventual death of susceptible bacteria (Dalié et al. [2010]). The same hypothesis could also explain the susceptibility of some fungal cultures to organic acids (Batish et al. [1997]). However, [Elsanhoty (2008]) suggested that the antifungal effect of LAB could not simply be the result of low pH but is most probably due to the formation and secretion of pH dependent antifungal metabolites. Magnusson and Schnürer ([2001]) found that the antifungal metabolite produced by the Lact. coryniformis subsp. coryniformis Si3 strain was a small highly heat stable peptide and its activity was stable at pHs between 3.0 and 4.5, but rapidly decreased between 4.5 and 6.0. No inhibitory activity was detected above pH 6.0.

In the present study, selected LAB strains were also inoculated onto fresh-cut onions to investigate in vivo application of these isolates. These isolates significantly inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas sp. and Lac+Enterobacteriaceae during storage at 5°C (Figure 3a, 3b). Similar results were reported by [Sharpe (2009]); when L. lactis and Ent. faecium were inoculated onto fresh-cut salads, the growth of Pseudomonas sp., yeasts and total coliforms were remarkably reduced. Vescovo et al. ([1995, 1996]) reported that the inoculation of ready-to-use vegetables with selected strains of LAB effectively controlled the growth of undesirable bacteria. In our challenge tests, L. innocua inoculated onto fresh-cut onions was reduced by 1 to 1.6 log cfu g-1 after 12 d storage at 5°C due to the presence of selected LAB strains. Although the inoculated LAB loads did not increase during the storage period, they still significantly inhibited the growth of L. innocua. Further investigations into the mechanisms of inhibition and determination of the optimal growth conditions for LAB to produce BLS are necessary. Moreover, more studies are required to envisage the effectiveness of LAB and BLS on other food products.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Drs. Greg Bezanson and Tim Ells at AAFC for their critical review and helpful suggestions in preparing the manuscript, thank Judy Kwan and Steve Brooks at Health Canada for doing the gene sequencing, and thank the MOE-AAFC Ph.D training program for supporting Ph.D students.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Centre
(3)
Kunming University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Abnous K, Brooks SPJ, Kwan J, Matias F, Green-Johnson J, Selinger LB, Thomas M, Kalmokoff M: Diets enriched in oat bran or wheat bran temporally and differentially alter the composition of the fecal community of rats. J Nutr 2009, 139: 2024–2031. 10.3945/jn.109.109470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Batish VK, Roy U, Lal R, Grover S: Antifungal attributes of lactic acid bacteria – A review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 1997, 17: 2009–2225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonadè A, Murelli F, Vescovo M, Scolari G: Partial characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus helveticus. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001, 33: 153–158. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00969.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowdish DM, Davidson DJ, Hancock RE: A re-evaluation of the role of host defence peptides in mammalian immunity. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2005, 6: 35–51. 10.2174/1389203053027494View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheikhyoussef A, Cheikhyoussef N, Chen H, Zhao J, Tang J, Zhang H, Chen W: Bifidin I – A new bacteriocin produced by Bifidobacterium infantis BCRC 14602: Purification and partial amino acid sequence. Food Control 2010, 21: 746–753. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.11.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherif A, Ouzari H, Daffonchio D, Cherif H, Slama KB, Hassen A, Jaoua S, Boudabous A: Thuricin 7: a novel bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis BMG1.7, a new strain isolated from soil. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001, 32: 243–247. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00898.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cintas LM, Casaus MP, Herranz C, Nes IF, Hernández PE: Review: Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Sci Tech Int 2001, 7: 281–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogan TM, Barbosa M, Beuvier E, Bianchi-Salvadori B, Cocconcelli PS, Fernandes I, Gomez J, Gomez R, Kalantzopoulos G, Ledda A, Medina M, Rea MC, Rodriguez E: Characterization of the lactic acid bacteria in artisanal dairy products. J. Dairy Res 1997, 64: 409–421. 10.1017/S0022029997002185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP: Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005, 3: 777–778. 10.1038/nrmicro1273View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Daeschel MA: Antimicrobial substances from lactic acid bacteria for use as food preservatives. Food Technol 1989, 43: 164–167.Google Scholar
  11. Dalié DKD, Deschamps AM, Richard-Forget F: Lactic acid bacteria – Potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: A review. Food Control 2010, 21: 370–380. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Delves-Broughton J, Blackburn P, Evans RJ, Hugenholtz J: Applications of the bacteriocin, nisin. Anton Leeuw Int J G 1996, 69: 193–202. 10.1007/BF00399424View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Diop MB, Dibois-Dauphin R, Tine E, Jacqueline AN, Thonart P: Bacteriocin producers from traditional food products. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 2007, 11: 275–281.Google Scholar
  14. Elsanhoty RM: Screening of some lactobacillus strains for their antifungal activities against aflatoxin producing aspergilli in vitro and maize. J Food Agric Environ 2008, 6: 35–40.Google Scholar
  15. Freitas WC, Souza EL, Sousa CP, Travassos AER: Anti- staphylococcal effectiveness of nisaplin in refrigerated pizza doughs. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2008, 51: 95–599.Google Scholar
  16. Gagnaire V, Jardin J, Jan G, Lortal S: Invited review: Proteomics of milk and bacteria used in fermented dairy products: From qualitative to quantitative advances. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92: 811–825. 10.3168/jds.2008-1476View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hajikhani R, Beyatli Y, Aslim B: Antimicrobial activity of enterococci strains isolated from white cheese. Int J Dairy Technol 2007, 60: 105–108. 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2007.00304.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Herreros MA, Sandoval H, González L, Castro JM, Fresno JM, Tornadijo ME: Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Armada cheese (a Spanish goats’ milk cheese). Food Microbiol 2005, 22: 455–459. 10.1016/j.fm.2004.11.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ibourahema C, Dauphin RD, Jacqueline D, Thonart P: Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from poultry farms in Senegal. African J Biotechnol 2008, 7: 2006–2012.Google Scholar
  20. Joshi VK, Sharmaand S, Rana NS: Production, purification, stability and efficacy of bacteriocin from isolates of natural lactic acid fermentation of vegetables. Food Technol Biotechnol 2006, 44: 435–439.Google Scholar
  21. Khalil R, Elbahloul Y, Djadouni F, Omar S: Isolation and partial characterization of a bacteriocin produced by a newly isolated Bacillus megaterium 19 strain. Pak J Nutr 2009, 8: 242–250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Visconti A: Antifungal activity of phenyllactic acid against molds isolated from bakery products. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69: 634–640. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.634-640.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. López-Díaz TM, Alonso C, Román C, García-López ML, Moreno B: Lactic acid bacteria isolated from a hand-made blue cheese. Food Microbiol 2000, 17: 23–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Magnusson J, Schnürer J: Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. coryniformis strain Si3 produces a broad-spectrum proteinaceous antifungal compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67: 1–5. 10.1128/AEM.67.1.1-5.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Naghmouchi K, Kheadr E, Lacroix C, Fliss I: Class I /Class IIa bacteriocin cross-resistance phenomenon in Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol 2007, 24: 718–727. 10.1016/j.fm.2007.03.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reuter G: Elective and selective media for lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 1985, 2: 55–68. 10.1016/0168-1605(85)90057-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Savadogo A, Ouattara CAT, Basssole IHN, Traoer SA: Bacteriocins and lactic acid bacteria- a minireview. Afr J Biotechnol 2006, 5: 678–683.Google Scholar
  28. Schillinger U, Becker B, Vignolo G, Holzapfel WH: Efficacy of nisin in combination with protective cultures against Listeria monocytogenes Scott A in tofu. Int J Food Microbiol 2001, 71: 159–168. 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00612-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sezer G, Güven A: Investigation of bacteriocin production capability of lactic acid bacteria isolated from foods. Lafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2009, 15: 45–50.Google Scholar
  30. Sharpe VD: Bioproservation of fresh-cut salads using bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria isolate from commercial produce. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, Master's Thesis; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Simova ED, Beshkova DB, Dimitrov ZP: Characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Bulgarian dairy products. J Appl Microbiol 2009, 106: 692–701. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04052.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stiles M, Holzapfel W: Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int J Food Microbiol 1997, 36: 1–29. 10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01233-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Staszewski M, Jagus RJ: Natural antimicrobials: Effect of MicrogardTM and nisin against Listeria innocua in liquid cheese whey. Int Dairy J 2008, 18: 255–259. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.08.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tasara T, Stephan R: Review cold stress tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes: A review of molecular adaptive mechanisms and food safety implications. J Food Protection 2006, 69: 1473–1484.Google Scholar
  35. Todorov SD, Dicks LMT: Bacteriocin production by Pediococcus pentosaceusisolated from marula (Scerocarya birrea). Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 132: 117–126. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Trias R, Bañeras L, Badosa E, Montesinos E: Bioprotection of Golden Delicious apples and Iceberg lettuce against foodborne bacterial pathogens by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 123: 50–60. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.065View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Trias R, Bañeras L, Badosa E, Montesinos E: Lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruit and vegetables as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int Microbiol 2008, 11: 231–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vescovo M, Orsi C, Scolari G, Torriani S: Inhibitory effect of selected lactic acid bacteria on microflora associated with ready-to-use vegetables. Letters in Applied Microbiol 1995, 21: 121–125. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01022.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Vescovo M, Torriani S, Orsi C, Macchiarolo F, Scolari G: Application of antimicrobial producing lactic acid bacteria to control pathogens in ready-to-use vegetables. J Applied Bacteriol 1996, 81: 113–119. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb04487.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Vescovo M, Scolari G, Zacconi C: Inhibition of Listeria innocua growth by antimicrobial-producing lactic acid cultures in vacuum-packed cold-smoked salmon. Food Microbiol 2006, 23: 689–693. 10.1016/j.fm.2005.12.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yang et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.