- Original article
- Open Access
- Published:
Bioprospecting endophytic fungi for antifeedants and larvicides and their enhancement by gamma irradiation
AMB Express volume 12, Article number: 120 (2022)
Abstract
The search and discovery of new natural products with antifeedant and larvicidal potentials to mitigate harmful insects are scientific pressing issues in the modern agriculture. In this paper, the antifeedant and larvicidal potentials of 69 fungal isolates were screened against the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. A total of 17 isolates showed the insecticidal potentials with three promising isolates. These strains were Aspergillus sydowii, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, and Aspergillus flavus isolated from Ricinus communis (bark), Terminalia arjuna (Bark), and Psidium guajava (twigs), respectively. The effect of gamma irradiation on the antifeedant and larvicidal activities of the three strains was investigated. Exposure of the fungal spores to 1000Â Gy of gamma rays significantly intensified both the antifeedant and larvicidal potentials. To identify compounds responsible for these activities, extracts of the three strains were fractionated by thin layer chromatography. The nature of the separated compounds namely, Penitrem A, 1, 3, 5, 8- tetramethyl- 4, 6-diethyl- 7- [2- (methoxycarbonyl)ethyl] porphyrin (from A. sydowii), Penitrem A, 2, 7, 12, 17-Tetramethyl-3, 5:8, 10:13, 15:18, 20-tetrakis (2,2-dimethylpropano) porphyrin (from A. flavus), N,N-Diethyl-3-nitrobenzamide, and Diisooctyl-phthalate (from L. theobromae) were studied by GC-MS analysis. These findings recommend endophytic fungi as promising sources of novel natural compounds to mitigate harmful insects.
Key points
-
Three promising fungal endophytes with antifeedant and larvicidal activities were reported.
-
The antifeedant and larvicidal activities were intensified following exposure of fungal spores to 1000Â Gy gamma rays.
-
Extracts of the three strains were separately fractionated by TLC then GC-MS was used to identify chemical constituents responsible for bioactivity.
Introduction
There is a continuous need to search for new natural compounds to provide protection to important crops from pests and thereby ensuring a sustainable food production process (Jamiołkowska and Kopacki 2020). Besides, the pressing scientific and social necessities to develop safe, cheap, and eco-friendly alternatives to avoid hazards resulting from the excessive use of synthetic pesticides (Manu et al. 2021). Over the years, the use of phyto-chemicals as pesticides were extensively studied (Ali et al. 2021) with the result of the identification of several leads from a wide range of plant species (Walia et al. 2014). Although, plants proved to be a rich source of natural compounds for insect control, the very low yields and unsustainable supply were the main drawbacks (Molyneux et al. 2007). Recently, the scientific community was directed to exploit microorganisms in this regard as sustainable sources for obtaining bioactive molecules with insecticidal potential (Grabka et al. 2022). In particular, fungal populations had several advantages including the cheap and simple growth and metabolism, tolerance to improvement and modification which rendered fungi the most robust strategy (Hussein et al. 2022).
Nowadays, the bioprospection of fungal endophytes for new compounds to control insect growth is gaining more attention (Grabka et al. 2022). Generally, these endophytes proved to be excellent and sustainable sources of many bioactive compounds with potential applications in pharmaceutical (Golinska et al. 2015), agriculture, and food industry (Sridhar 2019). All plant species have their own endophytes within tissues (Wang et al. 2016), as a result of their coevolutionary processes (Petrini et al. 1992; Ismaiel et al. 2017). In this regard, they can ensure the host plant survival by producing growth promoting metabolites, aiding the plant nutrient assimilation, and producing pest and insect repellents (Baron and Rigobelo 2022). Thus, the possibilities to find new compounds to control insect such endophytes are tremendous. Furthermore, their high metabolic activity (El-Sayed 2021) will ensure their excellence as the ideal biotechnological agent in this regard. For all of these reasons, we have already described the isolation of 69 fungal endophytes and the evaluation of their antimicrobial, anticancer and antioxidant activities (El-Sayed et al. 2022a).
As a part of our continuing research work in this concern, the current work was directed to unlock the untapped potential of the endophytes isolated from different plant species in Egypt as antifeedants and larvicides against the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Bosid). This insect is considered as one of the most destructive agricultural lepidopterans with a resistance to several chemical insecticides (Hazaa et al. 2021). It attacks several economically significant crops belonging including crucifers, legumes, deciduous fruit trees, and grasses (El-Aswad et al. 2004). For example, it causes severe damage on cotton by feeding on the fruiting points, leaves, flower buds. As such, it’s larvae can bore into the tomato fruit rending it unsuitable for consumption (Khan and Ahmad 2015). In this paper, 69 fungal species were screened for the presence of antifeedant and larvicidal compounds in their cultures. Furthermore, the effect of gamma irradiation on the antifeedant and larvicidal properties of the fungal culture extracts was also adopted. Extracts from fungal cultures were fractionated by TLC then identified by GC-MS analysis.
Materials and methods
Endophytic fungi
Endophytic fungal isolates from our previous study (El-Sayed et al. 2022a) were used in this study to test their antifeedant and larvicidal potentials. Among the 69 fungal isolates, Aspergillus sydowii (an endophyte of Ricinus communis), Aspergillus flavus (an endophyte of Psidium guajava), and Lasiodiplodia theobromae (an endophyte of Terminalia arjuna) were selected according to our screening program (mentioned later). A. sydowii and A. flavus were previously identified (El-Sayed et al. 2022a). Identification of Lasiodiplodia theobromae was accomplished by colony morphology, growth characteristics, and molecular characterization. Morphological identification was performed by studying the colony on Czapek’s-yeast autolysate agar according to Moubasher (1993). Molecular characterization was performed according to the method by White et al. (1990) using PCR amplifed ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 rRNA-gene. In brief, DNA of the fungal strains were extracted and sequenced by Solgent Company (Daejeon, South Korea). Sequences of the two strains were submitted to the GenBank and accession numbers were received. Finally, sequences were analyzed using the online tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) BLAST and the software BioEdit (version 7.0.1). Statistical tests for branch support were performed by approximate likelihood-ratio test using molbiol-tools/ Phylogeny (Phylogeny.fr) A neighbor-joining tree with the maximum-likelihood for each fungal strain were constructed using MEGA software version 6.0.
The three fungal endophytes were then deposited under numbers AUMC14506, AUMC14507, and AUMC14508 in the Culture Collection of Assiut University Mycological Center (AUMC), Egypt. Fungal strains were stored in the form of a suspension of spores and mycelia in 15% glycerol at − 4 °C.
Test insect
Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval 1833) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) cultures were initiated from egg-masses collected from an infested local field cultivated with cotton at Qualubia Governorate, Egypt. Confirmation of S. littoralis was performed by morphological identification (Blair 1974). The collected egg-masses were then surface sterilized with formalin vapor. The freshly hatched larvae were fed on castor oil (Ricinus communis) plant freshly collected leaves and kept in a 1600 cc glass jars. All jars were covered with muslin cloth and kept at 25℃ and 60–70% R. H. Finally, the 3rd instar larvae were collected and used in the screening program.
Cultivation conditions
Spores of A. sydowii 14506, L. theobromae AUMC14508, and A. flavus AUMC14507 and were separately harvested from 7-days old culture. The final concentration of spores was 106 mL− 1. Under aseptic conditions, 1 mL suspension was added to 50 mL (pH 6.0) sterilized Potato-dextrose broth in a 250 Erlenmeyer flask. The inoculated flasks for the three fungal strains incubated for 7 days at 30℃.
Preparation of the fungal culture extracts
After incubation, culture filtrate for each fungal strain was filtered over Whatman No. 1 filter paper. A portion of the cell-free filtrate was kept for the evaluation process. The other portion was extracted with methylene chloride (1 : 1, thrice, on an equal volume basis) and the organic layer was filtered over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The filtered organic layer was evaporated using a rotary evaporator (IKA, RV10, Germany) under reduced pressure at 40 °C and the final dry film was dissolved in methanol. Finally, the concentrated extract was used for evaluation.
Screening endophytic fungi for their antifeedant and larvicidal activities
Antifeedant bioassay
The antifeedant potential of the cell-free filtrate and the methylene chloride extract separated from the cultures of all the isolated endophytes was investigated using the leaf disc bioassay according to Duraipandiyan et al. (2011). Fresh castor oil leaf discs (4Â cm diameter) were punched using a cork borer and dipped in either cell-free filtrate, methylene chloride extract, or methanol (control) and let to air-dry. To avoid early drying of the discs, it was placed in Petri dishes containing wet filter paper. Finally, the 3rd instar larvae of S. littoralis were introduced into Petri dishes containing the respective leaf discs. Each treatment was replicated five times with ten larvae in each replicate. The antifeedant activity was measured according to Thyagaraja and Rani (2019) in terms of reduction in the weight gain treated larvae as compared to the weight gain in control larvae after feeding for 48Â h using the following formula:
Antifeedant activity (%) = [(Weight gain in control - Weight gain in treated)/(Weight gain in control)] × 100.
Larvicidal bioassay
The larvicidal potential of cell-free filtrate and methylene chloride extract of cultures from all the fungal isolates were performed according to WHO protocol (2005) using leaf dipping method (Hazaa et al. 2021). Fresh castor leaves were dipped in either cell-free filtrate, methylene chloride extract, methanol (control) and let to air-dry. To avoid early drying of the discs, it was placed in Petri dishes containing wet filter paper. The 3rd instar larvae of S. littoralis were introduced into Petri dishes containing the respective leaves and fed for 24Â h, then maintained on untreated fresh leaves changed every 24Â h. Five replicates were maintained for each treatment with ten larvae per replicate. The dead larvae were identified by the absence of movement and their subsequent change in color. Larval mortality was recorded every day for 14 days of treatment and percent of the cumulative mortality was estimated.
Effect of gamma irradiation on the antifeedant and larvicidal activities
Spore suspensions of A. sydowii, A. flavus and L. theobromae were prepared. Every suspension was exposed to several doses of gamma rays in the range 250–4000 Gy. Gamma chamber (60Co, MC20, Russia) was used with the dose rate 432.80 Gy h− 1. Then, 1 mL of the irradiated suspensions for every fungal strain was used in fungal cultivation and preparation of the methylene chloride extract and evaluation of the antifeedant and larvicidal activities, as described earlier. Moreover, survival rate was estimated for each fungal strain as follows: 100 µL of the irradiated suspension was spread on potato-dextrose solid medium and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. The survived colonies were counted and the number of colonies obtained from the control culture (non-irradiated) was considered to be 100% survival.
Analytical methods
Estimation of dry biomass
After 7 days of the incubation period, the inoculated flasks were filtered through pre-weighted Whatman no.1 filter papers. The collected fresh biomass from each flask was dried at 50 °C in a hot air oven to a constant weight.
Fractionation of the fungal extracts by thin layer chromatography (TLC)
The methylene chloride extracts of the three fungal strains was subjected to TLC on thin layer plates (0.25-mm GF-254, Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India). A solvent mixture composed of 9:1 chloroform: methanol (v/v) was used. The developed plates were air-dried and examined under shortwave (245Â nm) and longwave (365Â nm) UV lamp. Consequently, the separated bands from each fungal extract lane were carefully removed by scraping off the silica gel and eluted with methanol. Each band separated from the TLC plates was tested for their antifeedant and larvicidal potentials (as described earlier).
GC-MS analysis
Active bands from TLC were subjected to GC-MS analysis using a Thermo Scientific, Trace GCUltra/ISQ Single Quadrupole MS, TG-5MS fused silica capillary (30 m, 0.251 mm, 0.1 mm film thickness) column. The electron ionization system was of energy equal to 70 eV. Helium gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min was used as the carrier. The MS transfer line and the injector temperature were set at 280℃. Identification of the compounds was performed based on the comparison of their mass spectra and relative retention times with those of the WILLY, NIST library data of the GC-MS system.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation calculated from five replicate measurements from two independent experiment. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunken’s test were used to evaluate the significant significance (at 95% confidence intervals) using SPSS software (v. 22, IBM, NY).
Results
Endophytes’ screening for their antifeedant and larvicidal potentials
Fungi (69 endophytic isolates) were separately grown in PD broth at 30℃ for 7 days. Fungal cultures were filtered and a portion was extracted by methylene chloride. The cell-free filtrate and the methylene chloride extract were separately tested for their insecticidal activities against the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Screening profile (Table 1; Fig. 1) of the 69 isolates revealed the presence of 17 positive isolates with larvicidal potential and 3 with antifeedant potential. Table 1 presented the preliminary morphological identification of the 17 isolates to the genus level. Among them, three isolates named Bb2, Mc1, and Db1 showed recorded the highest values of both the evaluated activities. Moreover, the recorded data (Table 1) indicated the superiority of the methylene chloride extract against the cell-free filtrate in all the tested activities. Accordingly, the three fungal isolates Bb2, Mc1, and Db1 were selected for identification and chemical characterization of their methylene chloride extracts.
Photographs of the 3rd instar Spodoptera littoralis larvae feeding on castor leaves. AÂ Leaf discs used in antifeedant activity evaluation after treatment. BÂ Control untreated leaf discs with larvae after 48Â h. CÂ Treated discs with larvae fed after 24Â h. DÂ Treated castor leaves used in larvicidal activity evaluation with larvae fed at 0Â h. E, FÂ Dead larvae after fed on treated leaves
Morphological and molecular identification
The two isolates Bb2 and Db1 were previously identified in our previous study as A. sydowii and A. flavus, respectively. Meanwhile, Fig. 2 presented the colony morphology of Lasiodiplodia theobromae grown on CYA-agar plates. L. theobromae had fast growing, dark colored colony at 25 °C after 10 days. Microscopic examination further showed dark colored flask-shaped pycnidium which contains asexual conidiospores. Sequences of L. theobromae obtained from molecular characterization were deposited in the GenBank under number MW092908, then analyzed and a phylogenetic tree was built. Figure 3 presented the constructed phylogenetic tree confirming that L. theobromae AUMC14508 showed 100% identity with strains of L. theobromae including the Type strain CBS16496T (NR_111174), SDBR-CMU354 (MN339683), UFRPE CFS (MG870600), and NIBM-ABIJL (MN335222). Strains of Phoma herbarum are included as outgroup fungal species in the tree (Fig. 3).
Improving the antifeedant and larvicidal activities by gamma irradiation
Spores of A. sydowii, A. flavus and L. theobromae were separately subject to gamma radiation at several doses to study the effect of exposure to gamma rays on the antifeedant and larvicidal activities of the three strains. Generally, the remarkable feature of the obtained results in Tables 2 and 3, and 4 is the dose-dependent manner of the influence of irradiation on both the survival rate and fungal growth of A. sydowii, A. flavus and L. theobromae. Tables 2 and 3, and 4 further indicated that the most proper dose for achieving the highest values of the antifeedant and larvicidal potentials for the three strains was at 1000 Gy. At this dose of gamma irradiation, significant differences in the recorded values of both the antifeedant and larvicidal activities as compared to the control non-irradiated cultures were observed (Tables 2 and 3, and 4).
Separation of active constituents by TLC chromatography and identification by GC–MS
The methylene chloride extract was subjected to thin layer chromatography (TLC). Figure 4 presented the separated bands from each fungal extract visualized under 245 nm (Fig. 4 A) and 365 nm (Fig. 4B) UV light. All the separated bands were tested for their antifeedant and larvicidal activity to detect the active fractions. The active bands were band No. 2 for A. sydowii, band No. 2 for A. flavus, and band No. 1 for L. theobromae. The three bands were subjected to GC Mass to identify compounds responsible for the antifeedant and larvicidal activities.
GC-MS analysis of the separated bands revealed the presence of 6 different compounds. The identification was accomplished using computer search user-generated reference libraries, incorporating mass spectra. Structures of the detected compounds, molecular weights and molecular formulas were listed in Table 5. The identified compounds for A. sydowii were PENITREM A (Fig. 5A) and 1,3,5,8-tetramethyl-4,6-diethyl-7-[2-(methoxycarbonyl)ethyl]porphyrin (Fig. 5B). In the case of A. flavus, the identified compounds were PENITREM A (Fig. 5c) and 2,7,12,17-Tetramethyl-3,5:8,10:13,15:18,20-tetrakis(2,2-dimethylpropano)porphyrin (Fig. 5D). In the case of L. theobromae, the identified compounds were N-Diethyl-3-nitrobenzamide (Fig. 5E) and Diisooctyl-phthalate (Fig. 5F).
Discussion
Nowadays, fungal endophytes are considered an emerging source for several bioactive metabolites (Mousa et al. 2021; Hussein et al. 2022) including insecticidal that will be exploited in many agricultural applications and food industries. In this manner, the aim of the presented research lies in an underestimated and unexploited research subject: antifeedants and larvicides from endophytic fungal isolates of some plants in Egypt. Our results confirmed that three isolates named Bb2, Mc1, and Db1, showed the highest values of both the evaluated activities. As such, the obtained results indicated the superiority of the methylene chloride extract over the cell-free filtrate in the tested antifeedant and larvicidal bioactivities. The two fungal isolates Bb2 and Db1 were identified in our previous study as Aspergillus sydowii AUMC14506 and Aspergillus flavus AUMC14507, respectively (El-Sayed et al. 2022a). Meanwhile, morphological characteristics of the third fungal strain Mc1 were identical with those concerning the identification of Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Moubasher 1993). Furthermore, the molecular characterization of the Mc1 strain showed high conformity with Lasiodiplodia theobromae related strains. Lasiodiplodia theobromae is a common fungus found in tropical and subtropical regions and belongs to the family Botryosphaeriaceae. Several reports confirmed the diverse array of bioactive low molecular weight compounds produced by L. theobromae cultures (Salvatore et al. 2020, and references therein).
Here, spores of A. sydowii, A. flavus and L. theobromae were separately subject to gamma radiation at several doses to study the effect of exposure gamma rays on the antifeedant and larvicidal activities of the three strains. Our data indicated that the most proper dose for maximum values of the recorded antifeedant and larvicidal activities for the three strains was at 1000Â Gy. Similarly, the same irradiation dose successfully intensified the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer activities from extract of the same strains A. sydowii, A. flavus (El-Sayed et al. 2022a). Also, the same irradiation dose improved production of the cardiac glycoside digoxin to a five-fold increase by Epicoccum nigrum (El-Sayed et al. Â 2020b). Moreover, the same effect of exposure to gamma rays on the survival and the fungal growth was observed by previous reports (Awan et al. 2011; El-Sayed and Zaki 2022; El-Sayed et al. 2019a; b; c). Previous reports concluded the effect of gamma rays as an energetic ionizing radiation in induction of mutations in the exposed cells (Thacker 1999) through the repair mechanism in genes of the DNA of the irradiated cells (Ismaiel et al. 2014, 2015; Zaki et al. 2020; Zaki and El-Sayed 2021). Generally, exposure to physical mutagens such as gamma rays is a successful strategy to improve microbial strains by developing overproducers (Parekh et al. 2000) with intensified production rates (El-Sayed et al. Â 2020a, c; Zaki et al. 2020) with industrial applications thereby effectively lowering the overall cost of the process, as supported by several reports (Anwar et al. 2022;Â El-Sayed et al. 2020d, e, f; El-Sayed 2021; El-Sayed et al. 2022b; c).
In the current study, the methylene chloride extract was subjected to thin layer chromatography (TLC) and examined under UV light radiation. Separated bands from TLC plates for each fungal strain were tested for their antifeedant and larvicidal potentials. The active bands were then subjected to GC-MS analysis to identify the active compounds responsible for the antifeedant and larvicidal activities. The identification was accomplished using computer search user-generated reference libraries, incorporating mass spectra. The identified compounds PENITREM A (from A. sydowii and A. flavus), 1,3,5,8-tetramethyl-4,6-diethyl-7-[2-(methoxycarbonyl)ethyl]porphyrin (from A. sydowii), 2,7,12,17-Tetramethyl-3,5:8,10:13,15:18,20-tetrakis(2,2-dimethylpropano)porphyrin (from A. flavus), N-Diethyl-3-nitrobenzamide and Diisooctyl-phthalate (from L. theobromae). In the literature, Penitrems are well known toxic fungal metabolites produced by several fungal species (Boguś et al. 2021). It is capable of eliciting tremors in vertebrate animals and showed insecticidal activity against Bombyx mori, Heliothis zea, and Spodoptera frugiperda (González et al. 2003). Meanwhile, porphyrins are a group of heterocyclic macrocycle organic compounds with diverse biotechnological applications (Alves et al. 2015) include their successful use as insecticides (Amor and Jori 2000). Interestingly, N-Diethyl-3-nitrobenzamide, from L. theobromae culture, is a derivative of the most extensively used chemical repellent, N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) displayed repellency to a wide range of insects, including kissing bug, fruit flies, mosquitos, the tropical bed bug and the common bed bug (Syed and Leal 2008; Terriquez et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2017). Also, the Diisooctyl-phthalate from L. theobromae culture is a phthalate derivative. It possess significant mosquito larvicidal activity attributed to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase enzyme activity (Huang et al. 2021). Moreover, synthetic diethyl phthalate (Xu and He 2010) and dimethyl phthalate (Brown and Hebert 1997) have been used as active ingredients in insect repellents.
In summary, three promising endophytic fungal strains with antifeedant and larvicidal potentials against the 3rd instar Spodoptera littoralis larvae were reported. These strains were A. sydowii, A. flavus, and L. theobromae. The antifeedant and larvicidal activities of the three strains were intensified following exposure of the fungal spores to gamma rays. Extracts of the three strains were fractionated by TLC and active fractions was analyzed by GC-Mass. The present study recommends fungal endophytes as promising sources of antifeedants and larvicides which open the way to their use in several agricultural applications.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Ali S, Li Y, Haq IU, Abbas W, Shabbir MZ, Khan MM, Mamay M, Niaz Y, Farooq T, Skalicky M, Zuan ATK, Nasif O, Ansari MJ (2021) The impact of different plant extracts on population suppression of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) yield under field conditions. PLoS ONE 16:e0260470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260470
Alves E, Faustino MAF, Neves MGPMS, Cunha A, Nadais H, Almeida A (2015) Potential applications of porphyrins in photodynamic inactivation beyond the medical scope. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 22:34–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.09.003
Amor TB, Jori G (2000) Sunlight-activated insecticides: historical background and mechanisms of phototoxic activity. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 30:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(00)00072-2
Anwar MM, Aly SSH, Nasr EH, El-Sayed ER (2022) Improving carboxymethyl cellulose edible coating using ZnO nanoparticles from irradiated Alternaria tenuissima. AMB Expr 12:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01459-x
Awan MS, Tabbasam N, Ayub N, Babar ME, Rahman M, Rana SM, Rajoka MI (2011) Gamma radiation induced mutagenesis in Aspergillus niger to enhance its microbial fermentation activity for industrial enzyme production. Mol Biol Rep 38:1367–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0239-3
Baron NC, Rigobelo EC (2022) Endophytic fungi: a tool for plant growth promotion and sustainable agriculture. Mycology 13:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2021.1945699
Blair BW (1974) Identification of economically important Spodoptera larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Entomol Soc South Afri 37:195–196
Boguś MI, Wrońska AK, Kaczmarek A, Boguś-Sobocińska M (2021) In vitro screening of 65 mycotoxins for insecticidal potential. PLoS ONE 16:e0248772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248772
Brown M, Hebert AA (1997) Insect repellents: an overview. J Am Acad Dermatol 36:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70289-5
Duraipandiyan V, Ignacimuthu S, Paulraj MG (2011) Antifeedant and larvicidal activities of rhein isolated from the flowers of Cassia fistula L. Saudi J Biol Sci 18:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.12.009
El-Aswad AF, Abdelgaleil SAM, Nakatani M (2004) Feeding deterrent and growth inhibitory properties of limonoids from Khaya senegalensis against the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis. Pest Manag Sci 60:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.818
El-Sayed ER (2021) Discovery of the anticancer drug vinblastine from the endophytic Alternaria alternata and yield improvement by gamma irradiation mutagenesis. J Appl Microbiol 131:2886–2898. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15169
El-Sayed ER, Zaki AG (2022) Unlocking the biosynthetic potential of Penicillium roqueforti for hyperproduction of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid: Gamma radiation mutagenesis and response surface optimization of fermentation medium. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.2353
El-Sayed ER, Ahmed AS, Ismaiel AA (2019a) Agro-industrial byproducts for production of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid by Penicillium roqueforti under solid-state fermentation: enhanced production by ultraviolet and gamma irradiation. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 18:101015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.01.053
El-Sayed ER, Ismaiel AA, Ahmed AS, Hassan IA, Karam El-Din AA (2019b) Bioprocess optimization using response surface methodology for production of the anticancer drug paclitaxel by Aspergillus fumigatus and Alternaria tenuissima: enhanced production by ultraviolet and gamma irradiation. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 18:100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.01.034
El-Sayed ER, Ahmed AS, Hassan IA, Ismaiel AA, Karam El-Din AA (2019c) Strain improvement and immobilization technique for enhanced production of the anticancer drug paclitaxel by Aspergillus fumigatus and Alternaria tenuissima. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:8923–8935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10129-1
El-Sayed ER, Abdelhakim HK, Ahmed AS (2020a) Solid–state fermentation for enhanced production of selenium nanoparticles by gamma–irradiated Monascus purpureus and their biological evaluation and photocatalytic activities. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 43:797–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-019-02275-7
El-Sayed ER, Abdelhakim HK, Zakaria Z (2020d) Extracellular biosynthesis of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles by Monascus purpureus and their antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial activities: yield enhancement by gamma irradiation. Mater Sci Eng C 107:110318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110318
El-Sayed ER, Ahmed AS, Abdelhakim HK (2020b) A novel source of the cardiac glycoside digoxin from the endophytic fungus Epicoccum nigrum: Isolation, characterization, production enhancement by gamma irradiation mutagenesis and anticancer activity evaluation. J Appl Microbiol 128:747–762. https://doi.org/10.1011/JAM.14510
El-Sayed ER, Ahmed AS, Al-Hagar OEA (2020e) Agro-industrial wastes for production of paclitaxel by irradiated Aspergillus fumigatus under solid-state fermentation. J Appl Microbiol 128:1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14574
El-Sayed ER, Ahmed AS, Hassan IA, Ismaiel AA, Karam El-Din AA (2020f) Semi-continuous production of the anticancer drug taxol by Aspergillus fumigatus and Alternaria tenuissima immobilized in calcium alginate beads. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43:997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02295-8
El-Sayed ER, Zaki AG, Ahmed AS, Ismaiel AA (2020c) Production of the anticancer drug taxol by the endophytic fungus Epicoccum nigrum TXB502: enhanced production by gamma irradiation mutagenesis and immobilization technique. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:6991–7003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10712-x
El-Sayed ER, Gach J, Olejniczak T, Boratyński F (2022c) A new endophyte Monascus ruber SRZ112 as an efficient production platform of natural pigments using agro-industrial wastes. Sci Rep 12:12611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16269-1
El-Sayed ER, Hazaa MA, Shebl MA, Amer MM, Mahmoud SR, Khattab AA (2022a) Bioprospecting endophytic fungi for bioactive metabolites and use of irradiation to improve their bioactivities. AMB Expr 12:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1356802201386x
El-Sayed ER, Mousa SA, Abdou DAM, Abo ElSeoud MA, Elmehlawy AA, Mohamed SS (2022b) Exploiting the exceptional biosynthetic potency of the endophytic Aspergillus terreus in enhancing production of Co3O4, CuO, Fe3O4, NiO, and ZnO nanoparticles using bioprocess optimization and gamma irradiation. Saudi J Biol Sci 29:2463–2474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.019
Golinska P, Wypij M, Agarkar G, Rathod D, Dahm H, Rai M (2015) Endophytic actinobacteria of medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int J General Mol Microbiol 108:267–289
González MC, Cristina L, Pilar M, Ildefonso A, Jaime P, Eduardo PY (2003) Insecticidal activity of penitrems, including penitrem G, a new member of the family isolated from Penicillium crustosum. J Agric Food Chem 51:2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020983e
Grabka R, d’Entremont TW, Adams SJ, Walker AK, Tanney JB, Abbasi PA, Ali S (2022) Fungal endophytes and their role in agricultural plant protection against pests and pathogens. Plants 11:384. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030384
Hazaa M, Alm-Eldin M, Ibrahim AE, Elbakry N, Salama M, Sayed R, Sayed W (2021) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Borago officinslis leaf extract, characterization and larvicidal activity against cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Bosid). Int J Trop Insect Sci 41:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00187-8
Huang L, Zhu X, Zhou S, Cheng Z, Shi K, Zhang C, Shao H (2021) Phthalic acid esters: natural sources and biological activities. Toxins 13:495. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070495
Hussein HG, El-Sayed ER, Younis NA, Hamdy AA, Easa SM (2022) Harnessing endophytic fungi for biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles and exploring their bioactivities. AMB Expr 12:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01408-8
Ismaiel AA, Ahmed AS, El-Sayed ER (2014) Optimization of submerged fermentation conditions for immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid production by Penicillium roqueforti isolated from blue-molded cheeses: enhanced production by ultraviolet and gamma irradiation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:2625–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1685-1
Ismaiel AA, Ahmed AS, El-Sayed ER (2015) Immobilization technique for enhanced production of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid by ultraviolet and gamma irradiated Penicillium roqueforti. J Appl Microbiol 119:112–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12828
Ismaiel AA, Ahmed AS, Hassan IA, El-Sayed ER, Karam El-Din AA (2017) Production of paclitaxel with anticancer activity by two local fungal endophytes, Aspergillus fumigatus and Alternaria tenuissima. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:5831–5846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8354-x
Jamiołkowska A, Kopack M (2020) Chap. 5—natural compounds against plant pests and pathogens. In: Egbuna C, Sawicka B (eds) Natural remedies for pest, disease and weed control. Academic Press, Cham, pp 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819304-4.00005-1
Khan MA, Ahmad W (2015) The management of Spodopteran pests using fungal pathogens. In: Sree K, Varma A (eds) Biocontrol of lepidopteran pests. Soil biology, vol 43. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14499-3_6
Liu F, Xia X, Liu N (2017) Molecular basis of N,N-Diethyl-3-Methylbenzamide (DEET) in repelling the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius. Front Physiol 8:418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00418
Manu N, Schilling MW, Phillips TW (2021) Natural and synthetic repellents for pest management of the storage mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Sarcoptiformes: Acaridae). Insects 12:711. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080711
Molyneux RJ, Lee ST, Gardner DR, Panter KE, James LF (2007) Phytochemicals: the good, the bad and the ugly? Phytochemistry 68:22–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.09.004
Moubasher AH (1993) Soil fungi in Qatar and other Arab countries. The Centre for Scientific and Applied Research, Doha
Mousa SA, El-Sayed ER, Mohamed SS, Abo El-Seoud MA, Elmehlawy AA, Abdou DAM (2021) Novel mycosynthesis of Co3O4, CuO, Fe3O4, NiO, and ZnO nanoparticles by the endophytic Aspergillus terreus and evaluation of their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:741–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11046-4
Parekh S, Vinci VA, Strobel RJ (2000) Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000403
Petrini O, Sieber TN, Toti L, Viret O (1992) Ecology, metabolite production, and substrate utilization in endophytic fungi. Nat Toxins 1:185–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/nt.2620010306
Salvatore MM, Alves A, Andolfi A (2020) Secondary metabolites of Lasiodiplodia theobromae: distribution, chemical diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. Toxins 12:457. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070457
Srihdar KR (2019) Diversity, ecology, and significance of fungal endophytes. In: Jha S (ed) Endophytes and secondary metabolites, reference phytochemistry. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Basel, Switzerland, pp 61–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90484-9_5
Syed Z, Leal WS (2008) Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13598–13603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805312105
Terriquez JA, Klotz SA, Meister EA, Klotz JH, Schmidt JO (2013) Repellency of DEET, picaridin, and three essential oils to Triatoma rubida (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). J Med Entomol 50:664–667. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME12282
Thacker J (1999) Repair of ionizing radiation damage in mammalian cells. Alternative pathways and their fidelity. CR Acad Sci III 322:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(99)80030-4
Thyagaraja NE, Rani AT (2019) Techniques for determining the repellent and antifeedant activity to phytophagous insects. In: Kumar Chakravarthy A, Selvanarayanan V (eds) Experimental techniques in host-plant resistance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2652-3_20
Walia S, Saha S, Rana VS (2014) Phytochemical pesticides. In: Singh D (ed) Advances in plant biopesticides. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2006-0_15
Wang W, Kusari S, Spiteller M (2016) Unraveling the chemical interactions of fungal endophytes for exploitation as microbial factories. In: Purchase D (ed) Fungal applications in sustainable environmental biotechnology, fungal biology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42852-9_14
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
Xu H, He XQ (2010) Natural products-based insecticidal agents 6. Design, semisynthesis, and insecticidal activity of novel monomethyl phthalate derivatives of podophyllotoxin against Mythimna separata Walker in vivo. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:4503–4506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.032
Zaki AG, El-Sayed ER (2021) New and potent production platform of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor Huperzine A by gamma-irradiated Alternaria brassicae under solid-state fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:8869–8880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11678-0
Zaki AG, El-Sayed ER, Abd Elkodous M, El-Sayyad GS (2020) Microbial acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s therapy: recent trends on extraction, detection, irradiation-assisted production improvement and nano-structured drug delivery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:4717–4735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10560-9
WHO (2005) Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. World Health Organization document. WHO https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69101
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A.H. and M.M.S. experimental methodology design, data analysis, and manuscript revision. S.R.M. experimental, data analysis, original draft writing. E.R.E. research topic suggestion, experimental methodology design, experimental, data analysis, original draft writing and manuscript revision. M.M.A. and A.A.K. experimental methodology design, data analysis, and manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors of this article consented to its publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hazaa, M.A., Shebl, M.M., El-Sayed, ES.R. et al. Bioprospecting endophytic fungi for antifeedants and larvicides and their enhancement by gamma irradiation. AMB Expr 12, 120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01461-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01461-3
Keywords
- Antifeedant
- Larvicidal
- GC-MS analysis
- Gamma radiation
- Endophytic Fungi
- Spodoptera littoralis