Skip to main content

Establishment of the monomeric yellow-green fluorescent protein mNeonGreen for life cell imaging in mycelial fungi

Abstract

The engineered monomeric version of the lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum fluorescent protein, mNeonGreen (mNG), has several positive characteristics, such as a very bright fluorescence, high photostability and fast maturation. These features make it a good candidate for the utilization as fluorescent tool for cell biology and biochemical applications in filamentous fungi. We report the generation of plasmids for the expression of the heterologous mNG gene under the control of an inducible and a constitutive promoter in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora and display a stable expression of mNG in the cytoplasm. To demonstrate its usefulness for labeling of organelles, the peroxisomal targeting sequence serine-lysine-leucine (SKL) was fused to mNG. Expression of this tagged version led to protein import of mNG into peroxisomes and their bright fluorescence in life cell imaging.

Introduction

Fluorescence microscopy is a potent method for studying in vivo protein localization, cytoskeleton dynamics, infections and protein–protein-interactions in filamentous fungi (Berepiki et al. 2010; Chapuis et al. 2019; Hoff and Kück 2005; Lorang et al. 2001).

Fluorescent proteins can be expressed in fungal cells by inserting genes encoding fluorescent proteins into the genome under the control of constitutive or inducible promoters (Oda et al. 2016; Pöggeler et al. 2003). The green fluorescent protein GFP from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria and its engineered versions with altered spectral properties, such as yellow and cyan-shifted mutants, enhanced brightness versions or pH-sensitive variants have been utilized in fungal cell biology for many years (Bagar et al. 2009; Chalfie et al. 1994; Chudakov et al. 2005; Lorang et al. 2001; Rech et al. 2007).

In addition, the tetrameric fluorescent protein DsRed, its monomeric variant mRFP from the marine anemone Discosoma striata as well as brighter versions of mRFP (mCherry and tdTomato) emitting in the red light spectrum have been successfully expressed in filamentous fungi (Campbell et al. 2002; Mikkelsen et al. 2003; Schuster et al. 2015; Toews et al. 2004; Xiao et al. 2018). Furthermore, the red fluorescent TagRFP-T, from the sea anemone Entacmaea quadricolor has been applied in fungal life cell imaging (Schuster et al. 2015).

Recently, the new and very bright yellow fluorescent protein LanYFP with a high quantum yield (~ 0.95) and extinction coefficient (~ 150,000 M − 1 cm−1) was isolated from lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Engineering of the tetrameric LanYFP resulted in a 26.5 kDa monomeric, yellow–green fluorescent protein called mNeonGreen (mNG) (Shaner et al. 2013). In comparison to LanYFP, mNG harbors 21 substitutions and contains modified N- and C-termini of additional 11 and 7 amino acids derived from eGFP. mNG has a blue-shifted excitation maximum of 506 nm and an emission maximum of 517 nm with a high quantum yield excitation coefficient. Compared to eGFP it has a nearly threefold brighter emission, an increased photostability and shorter maturation time (Shaner et al. 2013). The new yellow- green fluorescent protein has been used mainly for fluorescent microscopy. It has been applied as genetically encoded tag to visualize gene products and cellular compartments in bacteria, animals, plants and yeast (Botman et al. 2019; Heppert et al. 2016; Hostettler et al. 2017; Stoddard and Rolland 2019; Wilton et al. 2017). Only one report exists on expression mNG in filamentous fungi. Recently, in Aspergillus fumigatus a version of mNG codon-optimized for the green algae Chlamydomonas rheinhardii was shown to be expressed under control of the strong constitutive tefA promoter (Pham et al. 2020).

Often expression of fluorescent proteins in filamentous fungi requires species-specific variants that can be efficiently transcribed and translated in the respected host. Therefore, often codon-optimization of the coding region and a fungal promoter that meets the conditions for a specific experimental set-ups have to be established (Lorang et al. 2001).

In this study, we demonstrate the successful expression of mNG in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora, a model organism for investigating fruiting body development and meiosis in fungi (Teichert et al. 2014, 2020; Zickler and Espagne, 2016). We generated plasmids for expression of mng under the control of the constitutive gpd promoter of Aspergillus nidulans and the xylose inducible Smxyl promoter of S. macrospora (Bloemendal et al. 2014). To demonstrate the usefulness of mNG for visualization of fungal organelles, we fused the peroxisomal localization signal SKL to mNG and monitored peroxisomes in S. macrospora.

Material and methods

Strains, media and growth conditions

Escherichia coli strain MACH1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C862003, Waltham, USA) was used for cloning and propagation of recombinant plasmids using standard culture conditions (Sambrook et al. 2001). Homologous recombination was performed to generate recombinant plasmids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PJ69-4A (Colot et al. 2006; James et al. 1996). S. macrospora strains were transformed with recombinant plasmids as described previously (Walz and Kück 1995). Selection of transformants was performed on media containing nourseothricin-dihydrogen sulphate (50 µg ml−1) (Jena Bioscience GmBH, AB-102XL, Jena, Germany). S. macrospora strains were grown at 27 °C on liquid or solid biomalt maize medium (BMM), or Sordaria Westergaard (SWG) fructification medium under continuous light conditions (Elleuche and Pöggeler 2008; Esser 1982; Nowrousian et al. 2005). To induce the xylose promoter, SWG medium was prepared with 2% xylose replacing glucose.

Generation of plasmids

All primers and template plasmids used for PCR amplifications are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Primers were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Taufkirchen, Germany).

Table 1 List of primers used in this study
Table 2 List of plasmids used in this study

To generate a plasmid in which mNG is under control of an inducible promoter we used the Golden Gate cloning system (Terfrüchte et al. 2014). This system uses restriction enzyme BsaI hydrolyzing 4 base pairs after its recognition site, independent from the identity of these four base pairs, which allows the generation of sticky overhangs, which can be used for complex fragment assemblies (Dahlmann et al. 2020). For the PCR amplification of the S. macrospora xyl promoter Smxyl, plasmid pNpX-GFP (Bloemendal et al. 2014) was used as template and Pxyl_fw and Pxyl_rev as primers. To amplify the gene coding for mNG, plasmid 753-pENTR20_mNeonGreen-N1 (a kind gift from Kay Oliver Schink, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine (CCB) Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet) served as template for PCR with primer pair Neon_fw/Neon_rev. The Smxyl-promoter fragment and the mng fragment were combined with vector pDest::amp (Dahlmann et al. 2020) by treatment with BsaI and T4 DNA-ligase. The resulting vector was used to amplify the Pxyl-mng fragment with the primer pair Pxylneon_fw/Pxylneon_rev. Both primers generated a 29-bp overhang at the PCR product which was together with XhoI linearized vector pRS-nat used for homologous recombination cloning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PJ69-4A (Colot et al. 2006). Since the resulting plasmid pxyl-mNeonGreen revealed no fluorescence after transformation into S. macrospora, we decided to introduce the terminator sequence of the trpC gene of Aspergillus nidulans downstream to the mng coding sequence. Plasmid pxyl-mNeonGreen was linearized with BsRGI and the A. nidulans trpC terminator was amplified with primer pair trpC-neon/TtrpC_pRS_r. Homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae resulted in plasmid pxyl-mng (Fig. 1a). To express mNG under the constitutive gpd promoter of A. nidulans, we utilized the Golden Gate cloning vector pGG-C-F. This vector contains a 3 × FLAG tag flanked by the gpd promoter and the trpC terminator of A. nidulans (Teichert et. al. unpublished). The mng ORF without STOP codon was PCR amplified with the primer pair Neon_fw-2/Neon_rev-2 and 753-pENTR20_mNeonGreen-N1 served as template. The resulting PCR fragment was combined with vector pGG-C-F. Incubation with BsaI and T4 DNA-ligase resulted in plasmid pGG-C-F-mng (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Physical maps of mNG plasmids. a pxyl-mng, b pGG-C-F-mng, c pmng-SKL The ampicillin resistance cassette (bla) and the ori for selection and replication in E. coli are indicated. The nourseothricin resistance gene nat1 is under control of the A. nidulans trpC promoter (PtrpC) can be used for selection of fungal transformants. The 2 µ ori and the ura3 gene can be used for transformation of S. cerevisiae. The mng ORF (green arrow) is either regulated by the xylose inducible Smxyl promoter of S. macrospora (Pxyl) or the gpd promoter A. nidulans (Pgpd) and the trpC terminator of A. nidulans (TtrpC). Plasmid pxyl-mng contains a multiple cloning site (MCS). In plasmid pGG-C-F-mng a C-terminal 3 × FLAG tag: (DYKDHD-G-DYKDHD-I-DYKDDDDK, red arrow) is fused via a short linker (GSGSG) to mNG. In plasmid pmng-SKL the peroxisomal targeting sequences SKL (orange arrow) is fused to the C-terminus of mNG

To label peroxisomes with mNG, we fused the peroxisomal targeting sequence 1 (PTS1) encoding the three amino acids serine-lysine-leucine (SKL) to the C-terminus of the mng ORF. The coding sequence of the mng gene was amplified from plasmid 753_pENTR20_mng-N1 with primer pair Neo_f/Neo_SKL_TrpC_r. The base-triplets encoding the SKL-motif is contained in the overhang of primer Neo_SKL_TrpC_r and was adapted to the codon usage of S. macrospora according to the HIVE-Codon Usage Table (https://hive.biochemistry.gwu.edu/review/codon2) (Athey et al. 2017). To put the mng-SKL gene under control of the constitutive gpd promoter and trpC terminator of A. nidulans, we amplified the promoter and terminator from plasmid p1783-1 with primer pair pRS_Pgpd_f/Pgpd_Neo_r and TtrpC_f /TtrpC_pRS_r, respectively. The three PCR products were cloned into XhoI-linearized vector pRS-nat by homologous recombination in yeast strain PJ69-4A (Colot et al. 2006). The resulting plasmid was designated pmng-SKL (Fig. 1c). DNA sequencing of the plasmids was performed by Seqlab Sequence Service Laboratories GmbH (Göttingen, Germany).

Generation of S. macrospora strains

All strains used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Strains were generated by transforming the plasmids (pxyl-mng, pGG-C-F-mng, pmng-SKL) presented in Table 2 into the S. macrospora wild type strain. Strains with ectopically integrated fusion constructs were selected on BMM medium supplemented with nourseothricin-dihydrogen sulphate (Hoff and Kück 2006; Walz and Kück 1995). Primary transformants were crossed with the color spore mutant fus1-1 (Nowrousian et al. 2012) to obtain single spore isolates (ssi) as described previously (Bernhards and Pöggeler, 2011). At least two independent ssi were analyzed in fluorescent microscopy.

Protein sample preparation and Western-blot analysis

S. macrospora strains were cultivated in corresponding media for three days. For the protein preparation, mycelium was harvested, dried, and ground in liquid nitrogen. 1 g of mycelium was combined with 560 µl extraction buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA) with freshly added 2 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 0.2% NP-40, protease inhibitor cocktail IV (1tbl/50 ml, 04693132001, Mannheim, Germany) and PhosSTOP™ (1 tbl/10 ml, Roche, 04906837001, Mannheim, Germany). Protein samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C. Afterwards, 45 µl of the supernatant was boiled with 50 µl of 2 × Tris-glycerine/ SDS-sample buffer (Serva, P190078, Heidelberg, Germany) and 5 µl of 1 M DTT for 2 min at 85 °C. 15 µl of the samples were loaded on a 12% SDS gel, together with the Nippon Genetics Co. Europe blue star pre-stained protein marker (NIPPON Genetics Europe, MWP03, Düren, Germany). Proteins separated in SDS-PAGE were transferred to a AmershamTM ProtranTM Nitrocellulose Blotting Membrane (GE Healthcare, RPN203B, Little Chalfont, UK) applying 300 mA a semi-dry device (Biometra, Fastblot 014–200 type B34, Göttingen, Germany) (Towbin et al. 1979). Transfer of proteins to the membrane was visualized by staining the membrane with Ponceau red solution (3% TCA, 0.2% Ponceau S) for 45 min and washing with A.dest.

Nitrocellulose membranes containing transferred proteins were washed once with 1 × Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20® (TBST) for 15 min and blocked with 5% (w/v) milk powder in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. Antigen–antibody reaction was performed using a mNeonGreen-antibody (1:5000; ChromoTek GmbH, 32f6-20, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany) and a horse-radish peroxidase (HRP) coupled secondary anti mouse-antibody (1:10,000 Sigma-Aldrich, A5278) solved in 5% skim milk/TBST. The membrane and the primary antibody solution were incubated over night at 4 °C. After the antibody was removed, the membrane was washed three times for 15 min with TBST. The secondary antibody was applied to the membrane for 1 h at room temperature and the membrane was washed three times with TBST. Enhanced chemiluminescent reaction was used to detect the HRP coupled antibodies using the ImmobilonTM Western HRP Substrate kit (Merck, WBKLS0500, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA).

Microscopy

To ensure that fungal cultures of identical developmental stages were compared in light and fluorescence microscopy, strains were grown for 24 h at 27 °C on BMM or SWG medium with cellophane and investigated with the AxioImager M1 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) (Rech et al. 2007). Microspcopic analysis was performed with at least two independent transformats in at least three replicates. Images were captured using a Photometrix CoolSNAP HQ camera (Roper Scientific, Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA) and image processing was done using ZEISS ZEN Digital Imaging (version 2.3; Zeiss): Exposure time was identical for all images. For the detection of the eGFP and mNG signals Chroma filter set 49002 (exciter ET470/40x, ET525/50 m, beamsplitter T495lpxr) and for DsRed Chroma filter set 49005 (exciter ET545/30x, emitter ET620/60 m and beamsplitter T570LP) were used. In addition, we used YFP Chroma filter set 49003 (exciter ET500/20x, emitter ET535/30 m and beamsplitter T515LP) for fluorescent mNG signals.

Results

Construction of fungal mNeonGreen reporter plasmids

The visualization of fluorescent reporter proteins is an important technique in fungal cell biology. Here, we examined the utilization of the lancelet yellow-green fluorescent protein for fluorescent microscopy in the filamentous ascomycete S. macrospora. From our experience, codon-usage optimized human genes encoding for fluorescent proteins perform best in S. macrospora (Pöggeler et al. 2003). Therefore, we employed a human codon-optimized version of the mNG gene, kindly provided by Dr. Kay Oliver Schink (Centre for Cancer Biomedicine (CCB) Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet). This mng version harbors 35 silent base mutations to be human codon-optimized for high expression levels in human cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1). In comparison to the original sequence [KC295282.1, (Shaner et al. 2013)], none of the four least used codons of S. macrospora are present in this human codon-optimized mng gene (Athey et al. 2017). Furthermore, with a 55.84% GC-content the humanized mng version is very similar to the 56.5% GC-content of coding regions in S. macrospora (Nowrousian et al. 2012).

To avoid a putative toxicity of mNG we first cloned mng under control of the xylose inducible promoter Smxyl of S. macrospora in plasmid pxyl-mng (Bloemendal et al. 2014) (Fig. 1a). The vector contains three unique sites of the commonly used restriction enzymes NotI, SpeI, and BamHI. All sites are located downstream of the mng gene and can be employed to C-terminally fuse fungal genes of interest. In plasmid pGG-C-F-mng, mng is under control of the constitutive A. nidulans gpd promoter and is further fused to a 3 × FLAG Tag, which can be used for Western-blot experiments with a commercially available FLAG antibody (Fig. 1b). Further, we constructed a mNG-SKL plasmid for labelling of peroxisomes, carrying mng-SKL under control of the constitutive gpd promoter as well (Fig. 1c).

Expression of mNG in S. macrospora

First, we applied plasmid pxyl-mng for transformation of S. macrospora wild type. Since this plasmid encodes mNG under control of the xylose inducible Smxyl promoter, we tested expression of the mng gene under different growth conditions by means of fluorescence microscopy and Western-blot analysis. Cultures were grown in synthetic Westergaards (SWG) medium (Nowrousian et al. 2005) supplemented with either glucose or xylose as the sole carbon source or on complex corn meal medium (BMM) (Towbin et al. 1979). In fluorescence microscopy, under all growth conditions the yellow green fluorescence signal was detectable in the cytoplasm of the transformants. The signal was clearly excluded from the vacuoles. The strongest signal could be observed under inducing conditions (SWG + xylose), whereas a weaker signal was detectable under repressed conditions (SWG + glucose) and growth in the complex BMM medium (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Fluorescence microscopy to demonstrate mng expression under control of the Smxyl promoter, grown under non-inducing (SWG + glucose, BMM) and inducing conditions (SWG + xylose). The exposure time for image acquisition under both conditions was set to be the same. Scale bar, 50 and 20 µm

These results were verified by Western-blot analysis (Fig. 3). After growth for 3 days in the respected liquid medium, mycelium was harvested and proteins were extracted from the transformants for SDS–PAGE and Western-blot analysis with an anti-mNeonGreen-antibody. We used transformants expressing eGFP as a negative control. A clear mNG signal of around 27 kDa was detectable for all three conditions. The strongest signal was visible under inducing conditions (SWG + xylose). In all lanes, a second band at slightly higher molecular weight than expected can be observed. This may be due to glycosylation or other protein modifications. mNG has only very little sequence identity in common with eGFP (Stoddard and Rolland 2019), therefore no cross reactivity of the mNeonGreen antibody was visible with eGFP (Fig. 3). These data indicate that the human codon optimized version of the mng gene can be expressed under control the inducible Smxyl promoter.

Fig. 3
figure3

Western-blot analysis of total protein extracts to demonstrate mng expression under control of the Smxyl promoter grown under non-inducing (SWG + glucose) and inducing conditions (SWG + xylose), as well as in BMM. An S. macrospora wt transformant carrying plasmid p1783 and expressing free eGFP served as a control. Ponceau red staining of the blot before the immunodetection served as loading control

Next, we tested the expression of the mng gene under control of the strong constitutive gpd promoter of A. nidulans. Western-blot analysis with the mNeonGreen antibody revealed a strong signal (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Compared to strains expressing DsRed or eGFP under control of the gpd promoter the fluorescence signal of mNG appeared almost equal (Fig. 4). The fluorescence intensity of strains expressing mng under control of the constitutive gpd promoter is similar to strains expressing mng under control of the inducible Smxyl promoter upon growth under inducing conditions (Fig. 4a, b). In all strains, the fluorescence was uniformly visible throughout the cytoplasm of the hyphae and appeared to be excluded from the vacuoles.

Fig. 4
figure4

Fluorescence microscopy of cytosolic-targeted mNG, eGFP and DsRed in S. macrospora. a mng expression under control of the constitutive gpd promoter of A. nidulans, b mng expression under control of the induced Smxyl promoter, c expression of egfp under control of the gpd promoter, d expression of DsRed under the control of the gpd promoter. The exposure time for image acquisition of all strains was set to be the same. Scale bar, 20 µm

In comparison to EGFP (excitation 488, emission 507), mNG has a yellow-shifted excitation maximum of 506 nm and an emission maximum of 517 nm, which is more similar to the yellow fluorescent protein EYFP (excitation 514 nm and emission 527). Shaner et al. (2013) recommended to image mNG using standard green fluorescent protein band-pass or long-pass filter sets, or with yellow fluorescent protein filter sets having only minimal reduction in collection efficiency. Therefore, we tested in addition to eGFP the eYFP filter set for mNG fluorescent microscopy. In comparison to the standard eGFP filter set, the usage of the eYFP filter lead to no obvious increase in fluorescence or brightness, only the contrast seems to be increased (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Furthermore, mNG revealed no fluorescence signal with the DsRed filter set (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Therefore, co-localization studies with red fluorescent proteins such as DsRed, mRFP, TagRFP-T, and tdTomato might be applicable in combination with mNG.

To demonstrate that mNG is suitable to label fungal peroxisomes, we fused the peroxisomal PTS1 signal SKL to the C-terminus of mNG and transformed plasmid pmng-SKL into the S. macrospora wild-type strain. Fluorescence microscopy of transformants carrying pmng-SKL led to a punctate fluorescent pattern (Fig. 5a). Similarly, a SKL-tagged DsRed previously used for peroxisomal studies in S. macrospora exhibited a punctate peroxisomal fluorescence signal (Fig. 5b) (Elleuche and Pöggeler 2008).

Fig. 5
figure5

Fluorescence microscopy of peroxisomal-targeted mNG and DsRed in S. macrospora. a Hyphae of a strain transformed with pmng-SKL. b Hyphae of a strain transformed with pDsRed-SKL. The exposure time for image acquisition of both strains was set to be the same. Scale bar, 20 µm

Discussion

Important innovations in fluorescent protein performance have been described with the discovery of brighter, more readily maturing and more photostable fluorescent proteins (Botman et al. 2019; Heppert et al. 2016). However, often these new proteins have not yet been tested with regard to their potential in filamentous fungi. Here, we expressed the yellow-green fluorescent protein mNG for the first time in S. macrospora. By using an inducible and a constitutive promoter, we generated transformants emitting bright and stable green fluorescence. Furthermore, we accomplished visualization of the peroxisomes by tagging mNG with a peroxisomal signal peptide.

The yellow-green fluorescent protein mNG was predicted to be superior to eGFP with regard to its brightness and photostability (Shaner et al. 2013), however, these effects were not that evident when the mng gene was expressed in S. macrospora. In vivo, mNG performed very much alike to eGFP. A similar observation has been described in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans where both fluorescent proteins behaved similarly in most experiments and mNG was only a better tag than eGFP in specific kinds of experiments (Heppert et al. 2016). In Dictyostelium discoideum mNG showed an increased brightness in comparison to eGFP (Paschke et al. 2018). Similarly, when using the EYFP filter set instead of the EGFP filter set, the fluorescence of mNG appeared brighter in S. macrospora. Therefore, one has to ensure to adapt filter set to mNG fluorescence.

In the yeast S. cerevisiae, a recent comprehensive in vivo characterization of 27 fluorescent proteins also revealed that in vitro properties of fluorescent proteins often only poorly reflect their in vivo performance. However, in yeast mNG was among the most photostable fluorescent proteins (Botman et al. 2019). Moreover, in Nicotiana benthamiana and S. cerevisiae, mNG was shown to be one of the best performing green fluorescent proteins under dynamic pH conditions (Botman et al. 2019; Stoddard and Rolland 2019). These conditions were not tested in our study.

For S. macrospora, we used a human codon usage optimized version of mng, confirming our previous experience with the expression of a human codon-optimized version of egfp (Pöggeler et al. 2003). It is quite possible that a specific S. macrospora codon-optimized version of mng and/or the addition of synthetic introns will perform even better, as it was shown for modified mng versions in human, C. elegans and S. cerevisiae (Botman et al. 2019; Heppert et al. 2016; Tanida-Miyake et al. 2018).

The selection of a suitable promoter is critical for the expression of heterologous fluorescent proteins in filamentous fungi. We have chosen the constitutive A. nidulans gpd promoter successfully applied in a variety of fungal species and additionally the inducible S. macrospora Smxyl promoter, previously reported to be functional in Acremonium chrysogenum (Bloemendal et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2020). Therefore, the expression plasmids presented here are likely useful for the expression of mng in filamentous fungi other than S. macrospora.

Labelling of peroxisomes with reporter fluorescent proteins carrying signal peptides for peroxisomal import is a powerful method for investigating peroxisome dynamics by means of live cell imaging. We showed that mNG-SKL efficiently labels peroxisomes in S. macrospora, similar to other fluorescent proteins like eGFP and DsRed carrying a C-terminal SKL tripeptide for peroxisomal matrix import (Elleuche and Pöggeler 2008; Idnurm et al. 2007; Ruprich-Robert et al. 2002).

In conclusion, the vectors for expression of mng and labelling of peroxisomes presented here will provide an alternative for tagging of proteins for fungal cell biology and biochemistry. Although the plasmids were primarily constructed for S. macrospora they should prove very effective in a wide variety of filamentous as well.

Availability of data and materials

All vectors described are available on request.

References

  1. Athey J, Alexaki A, Osipova E, Rostovtsev A, Santana-Quintero LV, Katneni U, Simonyan V, Kimchi-Sarfaty C (2017) A new and updated resource for codon usage tables. BMC Bioinform 18:391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagar T, Altenbach K, Read ND, Bencina M (2009) Live-Cell imaging and measurement of intracellular pH in filamentous fungi using a genetically encoded ratiometric probe. Eukaryot Cell 8:703–712

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berepiki A, Lichius A, Shoji J-Y, Tilsner J, Read ND (2010) F-Actin dynamics in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 9:547–557

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhards Y, Pöggeler S (2011) The phocein homologue SmMOB3 is essential for vegetative cell fusion and sexual development in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. Curr Genet 57:133–149

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloemendal S, Löper D, Terfehr D, Kopke K, Kluge J, Teichert I, Kück U (2014) Tools for advanced and targeted genetic manipulation of the β-lactam antibiotic producer Acremonium chrysogenum. J Biotechnol 169:51–62

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Botman D, de Groot DH, Schmidt P, Goedhart J, Teusink B (2019) In vivo characterisation of fluorescent proteins in budding yeast. Sci Rep 9:2234

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, Zacharias DA, Tsien RY (2002) A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7877–7882

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward W, Prasher D (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–805

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapuis AF, Ballou ER, MacCallum DM (2019) A Bright future for fluorescence imaging of fungi in living hosts. J Fungi 5:29

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chudakov DM, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov KA (2005) Fluorescent proteins as a toolkit for in vivo imaging. Trends Biotechnol 23:605–613

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Colot HV, Park G, Turner GE, Ringelberg C, Crew CM, Litvinkova L, Weiss RL, Borkovich KA, Dunlap JC (2006) A high-throughput gene knockout procedure for Neurospora reveals functions for multiple transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10352–10357

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlmann T, Terfehr D, Becker K, Teichert I (2020) Golden Gate vectors for efficient gene fusion and gene deletion in diverse filamentous fungi. Curr Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01143-2

  13. Elleuche S, Pöggeler S (2008) Visualization of peroxisomes via SKL-tagged DsRed protein in Sordaria macrospora. Fungal Genet Rep 55:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Esser K (1982) Cryptogams—cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, lichens. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heppert JK, Dickinson DJ, Pani AM, Higgins CD, Steward A, Ahringer J, Kuhn JR, Goldstein B (2016) Comparative assessment of fluorescent proteins for in vivo imaging in an animal model system. Mol Biol Cell 27:3385–3394

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoff B, Kück U (2005) Use of bimolecular fluorescence complementation to demonstrate transcription factor interaction in nuclei of living cells from the filamentous fungus Acremonium chrysogenum. Curr Genet 47:132–138

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoff B, Kück U (2006) Application of the nourseothricin acetyltransferase gene (nat1) as dominant marker for the transformation of filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Rep 53:9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hostettler L, Grundy L, Käser-Pébernard S, Wicky C, Schafer WR, Glauser DA (2017) The bright fluorescent protein mNeonGreen facilitates protein expression analysis in vivo. G3 7:607–615

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Idnurm A, Giles SS, Perfect JR, Heitman J (2007) Peroxisome function regulates growth on glucose in the basidiomycete fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell 6:60–72

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. James P, Halladay J, Craig EA (1996) Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425–1436

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Janus D, Hoff B, Hofmann E, Kück U (2007) An efficient fungal RNA-silencing system using the DsRed reporter gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:962–970

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Klix V, Nowrousian M, Ringelberg C, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC, Pöggeler S (2010) Functional characterization of MAT1-1-specific mating-type genes in the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora provides new insights into essential and nonessential sexual regulators. Eukaryot Cell 9:894–905

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lorang JM, Tuori RP, Martinez JP, Sawyer TL, Redman RS, Rollins JA, Wolpert TJ, Johnson KB, Rodriguez RJ, Dickman MB, Ciuffetti LM (2001) Green fluorescent protein is lighting up fungal biology. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1987–1994

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mikkelsen L, Sarrocco S, Lübeck M, Jensen DF (2003) Expression of the red fluorescent protein DsRed-Express in filamentous ascomycete fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 223:135–139

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nowrousian M, Ringelberg C, Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, Kück U (2005) Cross-species microarray hybridization to identify developmentally regulated genes in the filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora. Mol Genet Genom 273:137–149

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nowrousian M, Teichert I, Masloff S, Kück U (2012) Whole-genome sequencing of Sordaria macrospora mutants identifies developmental genes. G3 2:261–270

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oda K, Terado S, Toyoura R, Fukuda H, Kawauchi M, Iwashita K (2016) Development of a promoter shutoff system in Aspergillus oryzae using a sorbitol-sensitive promoter. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80:1792–1801

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Paschke P, Knecht DA, Silale A, Traynor D, Williams TD, Thomason PA, Insall RH, Chubb JR, Kay RR, Veltman DM (2018) Rapid and efficient genetic engineering of both wild type and axenic strains of Dictyostelium discoideum. PLoS ONE 13:e0196809

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pham T, Xie X, Lin X (2020) An intergenic “safe haven” region in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol 58:1178–1186

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pöggeler S, Masloff S, Hoff B, Mayrhofer S, Kück U (2003) Versatile EGFP reporter plasmids for cellular localization of recombinant gene products in filamentous fungi. Curr Genet 43:54–61

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rech C, Engh I, Kück U (2007) Detection of hyphal fusion in filamentous fungi using differently fluorescence-labeled histones. Curr Genet 52:259–266

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ruprich-Robert G, Berteaux-Lecellier V, Zickler D, Panvier-Adoutte A, Picard M (2002) Identification of six loci in which mutations partially restore peroxisome biogenesis and/or alleviate the metabolic defect of pex2 mutants in Podospora. Genetics 161:1089–1099

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schuster M, Kilaru S, Guo M, Sommerauer M, Lin C, Steinberg G (2015) Red fluorescent proteins for imaging Zymoseptoria tritici during invasion of wheat. Fungal Genet Biol 79:132–140

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shaner NC, Lambert GG, Chammas A, Ni Y, Cranfill PJ, Baird MA, Sell BR, Allen JR, Day RN, Israelsson M, Davidson MW, Wang J (2013) A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nat Methods 10:407–409

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stoddard A, Rolland V (2019) I see the light! Fluorescent proteins suitable for cell wall/apoplast targeting in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plant Direct 3:e00112

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tanida-Miyake E, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Tanida I (2018) Optimization of mNeonGreen for Homo sapiens increases its fluorescent intensity in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 13:e0191108

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Teichert I, Nowrousian M, Pöggeler S, Kück U (2014) The filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora as a genetic model to study fruiting body development. Adv Genet 87:199–244

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Teichert I, Pöggeler S, Nowrousian M (2020) Sordaria macrospora: 25 years as a model organism for studying the molecular mechanisms of fruiting body development. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:3691–3704

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Terfrüchte M, Joehnk B, Fajardo-Somera R, Braus GH, Riquelme M, Schipper K, Feldbrügge M (2014) Establishing a versatile Golden Gate cloning system for genetic engineering in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 62:1–10

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Toews MW, Warmbold J, Konzack S, Rischitor P, Veith D, Vienken K, Vinuesa C, Wei H, Fischer R (2004) Establishment of mRFP1 as a fluorescent marker in Aspergillus nidulans and construction of expression vectors for high-throughput protein tagging using recombination in vitro (GATEWAY). Curr Genet 45:383–389

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4350–4354

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Walz M, Kück U (1995) Transformation of Sordaria macrospora to hygromycin B resistance: characterization of transformants by electrophoretic karyotyping and tetrad analysis. Curr Genet 29:88–95

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilton R, Ahrendt AJ, Shinde S, Sholto-Douglas DJ, Johnson JL, Brennan MB, Kemner KM (2017) A new suite of plasmid vectors for fluorescence-based imaging of root colonizing pseudomonads. Front Plant Sci 8:2242

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiao C, Li L, Lao L, Liu Y, Wei Q, Ji Q, Sun G, Lin F, Wang J, Bao G (2018) Application of the red fluorescent protein mCherry in mycelial labeling and organelle tracing in the dermatophyte Trichophyton mentagrophytes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 365:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang T, Liu H, Lv B, Li C (2020) Regulating strategies for producing carbohydrate active enzymes by filamentous fungal cell factories. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:691

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zickler D, Espagne E (2016) Sordaria, a model system to uncover links between meiotic pairing and recombination. Semin Cell Dev Biol 54:149–157

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Kay Oliver Schink, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine (CCB) Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet for kindly providing mNG vector 753-pENTR20_mNeonGreen-N1 and Dr. Ines Teichert (Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany) for sharing plasmids for the GoldenGate cloning system. We wish to thank Dr. Daniela Nordzieke for critically reading the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PO 523/8-1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AW and SP made the experimental design; AW, KO, GS performed experiments and analyzed data; AW and SP wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Pöggeler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors give their consent for publication.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Overview of strains used and constructed in this study. Figure S1. Lalign (https://embnet.vital-it.ch/software/LALIGN_form.html) alignment of the human codon-optimized mNG version (mNGhco) and the mNG sequence published by (Shaner et al. 2013). Figure S2. Western-blot analysis with a NeonGreen antibody of the total protein extracts from a transformant carrying plasmid pGG-C-F-mng to demonstrate mng expression under control of the gpd promoter. Figure S3. Fluorescence microscopy of cytosolic-targeted mNG in S. macrospora wt strain under control of the constitutive gpd promoter of A. nidulans. Fluorescence was recorded with different filter sets: eGFP (Chroma filter set 49002) eYFP (Chroma filter set 49003), DsRed (Chroma filter set 49005). The exposure time for image acquisition of all strains was set to be the same. Scale bar, 50 µm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Werner, A., Otte, K.L., Stahlhut, G. et al. Establishment of the monomeric yellow-green fluorescent protein mNeonGreen for life cell imaging in mycelial fungi. AMB Expr 10, 222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01160-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • mNeonGreen
  • Sordaria macrospora
  • Peroxisomes
  • Fluorescent protein