Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Heterologous expression of genes for bioconversion of xylose to xylonic acid in Corynebacterium glutamicum and optimization of the bioprocess

Abstract

In bacterial system, direct conversion of xylose to xylonic acid is mediated through NAD-dependent xylose dehydrogenase (xylB) and xylonolactonase (xylC) genes. Heterologous expression of these genes from Caulobacter crescentus into recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 and C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 (with an innate pentose transporter, araE) resulted in an efficient bioconversion process to produce xylonic acid from xylose. Process parameters including the design of production medium was optimized using a statistical tool, Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Maximum xylonic acid of 56.32 g/L from 60 g/L xylose, i.e. about 76.67% of the maximum theoretical yield was obtained after 120 h fermentation from pure xylose with recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 containing the plasmid pVWEx1 xylB. Under the same condition, the production with recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 (with pVWEx1 xylB) was 50.66 g/L, i.e. 69% of the theoretical yield. There was no significant improvement in production with the simultaneous expression of xylB and xylC genes together indicating xylose dehydrogenase activity as one of the rate limiting factor in the bioconversion. Finally, proof of concept experiment in utilizing biomass derived pentose sugar, xylose, for xylonic acid production was also carried out and obtained 42.94 g/L xylonic acid from 60 g/L xylose. These results promise a significant value addition for the future bio refinery programs.

Key points

  • Made C. glutamicum recombinants with genes for xylose to xylonic acid conversion.

  • Bioprocess development using C. glutamicum for xylonic acid.

  • Conversion of biomass derived xylose to xylonic acid.

Introduction

D-xylonic acid, an oxidation product of xylose, is a versatile platform chemical with multifaceted applications in the fields of food, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture. It is considered by the U.S. Department of Energy to be one of the 30 chemicals of highest value because it can be used in a variety of applications, including as a dispersant, pH regulator, chelator, antibiotic clarifying agent and health enhancer (Byong-Wa et al. 2006; Toivari et al. 2012). Xylonic acid may also be used as a precursor for bio-plastic, polymer synthesis and other chemicals such as 1,2,4-butanetriol (Niu Wei et al. 2003). Although xylonic acid production is feasible via chemical oxidation using platinum or gold catalysts, selectivity is relatively poor (Yim et al. 2017). As the pentose sugar catabolism is restricted to the majority of the industrial microbes (Wisselink et al. 2009), microbial conversion of xylose to xylonic acid gained interest. As of now, biogenic production of xylonic acid has been accomplished in various microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis by introducing xylB (encoding xylose dehydrogenase) and xylC (encoding xylonolactonase) genes from Caulobacter crescentus or Trichoderma reesei (Nygård et al. 2011; Toivari et al. 2012; Cao et al. 2013).

As xylose is the monomeric sugar required for xylonic acid production, a lot of interest has been paid on utilizing xylose generated from lignocellulosic biomass (Lin et al. 2012). Bio-transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into platform chemicals is possible only through its conversion to monomeric sugars, mostly by pretreatment, i.e. pre-hydrolysis by alkali or acid at higher temperature or via enzymatic hydrolysis. Monomeric hexose and pentose sugars are generated from lignocellulosic biomass along with inhibitory by-products like furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde that affect the performance of microbial production hosts (Matano et al. 2014). The concept of biomass refinery is getting more and more attraction for the cost effectiveness of the 2G ethanol program. Microbial production of value-added products such as biopolymers, bioethanol, butanol, organic acids and xylitol were reported utilizing the C5 stream generated by the pretreatment of biomass by different microbes like Pichia stipitis, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Candida guilliermondii, Bacillus coagulans (Mussatto and Teixeira 2010; Ou et al. 2011; de Arruda et al. 2011; Lin et al. 2012; Raganati et al. 2015).

Although some of the industrial strains are capable of pentose fermentation, most of them are sensitive to inhibitors of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. However, Corynebacterium glutamicum showed remarkable resistance towards these inhibitory by-products under growth-arrested conditions (Sakai et al. 2007). C. glutamicum is a Gram-positive, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-spore forming soil actinomycete which exhibits numerous ideal intrinsic attributes as a microbial factory to produce amino acids and high-value chemicals (Heider and Wendisch 2015; Hirasawa and Shimizu 2016; Yim et al. 2017). This bacterium has been successfully engineered towards producing a broad range of products, including diamines, amino-carboxylic acids, diacids, recombinant proteins and even industrial enzymes (Becker et al. 2018; Baritugo et al. 2018). A lot of metabolic resurrections were reported in C. glutamicum for the production of chemicals like amino acids, sugar acid, xylitol and biopolymers from hemicellulosic biomasses such as wheat bran, rice straw and sorghum stover (Gopinath et al. 2011; Wendisch et al. 2016; Dhar et al. 2016).

Since C. glutamicum lacks the genes for the metabolic conversion of xylose to xylonic acid, the heterologous expression of xylose dehydrogenase (xylB) and xylonolactonase (xylC) genes from Caulobacter crescentus was attempted. In addition to ATCC 13032 wild type, we also explored the C.glutamicum ATCC 31831 culture which contains a pentose transporter gene (araE) which enables the uptake of pentose sugar (Kawaguchi et al. 2009; Choi et al. 2019). Both xylB and xylC genes individually, as well as together as xylBC, were amplified from xylose operon of C. crescentus and the plasmids were transformed to both C. glutamicum strains and checked the xylonic acid production.

Materials and methods

Microbial strains and culture conditions

Microbial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. For genetic manipulations, E. coli strains were grown at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium. C. glutamicum strains were grown at 30 °C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium. Where appropriate, media were supplemented with antibiotics. The final antibiotic concentrations for E. coli and C. glutamicum were 25 μg/ml of kanamycin. Culture growth was measured spectrophotometrically at 600 nm using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (UVA-6150, Shimadzu, Japan).

Table 1 Microbial strains, plasmids and primers used in the study

Molecular techniques and strain construction

Standard molecular techniques were done according to the protocol described by (Sambrook et al. 2006). Genomic DNA isolation was done with Gen Elute genomic DNA isolation kit (Sigma, India). Plasmid isolation was done using Qiagen plasmid midi kit (Qiagen, Germany). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using automated PCR System (My Cycler, Eppendorff, Germany) in a total volume of 50 μl with 50 ng of DNA, 0.2 mM dNTP in PrimeSTAR™ buffer (Takara), and 1.25 U of PrimeSTAR™ HS DNA polymerase (Takara) and the PCR product was purified by QIA quick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Germany) as per the instructions provided by the manufacturers. Competent E. coli DH5α cells were prepared by Transformation and Storage Solution (TSS) method and transformed by heat shock (Chung and Miller 1993). The C. glutamicum competent cells were electroporated to achieve the transformation (van der Rest et al. 1999).

Xylose dehydrogenase (xylB) and xylonolactonase (xylC) and xylBC genes together of Caulobacter crescentus were amplified from the xylose-inducible xylXABCD operon (CC0823–CC0819) (Stephens et al. 2007) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with appropriate primers as shown in Table 1 and the purified PCR products (747 bp xylB, 870 bp xylC and 1811 bp xylBC) were verified by sequencing and cloned into the restriction digestion site (Bam HI/Pst I) of pVWEx1 shuttle vector. The engineered plasmids so-called pVWEx1xylB, pVWEx1xylC and pVWEx1xylBC were transformed into E. coli DH5α and the transformants bearing pVWEx1 derivative were screened in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (25 µg mL−1). Competent cells of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 and ATCC 31831 were prepared and the plasmids were electroporated into both the C. glutamicum strains with parameters set at 25 μF, 600 Ω and 2.5 kV, yielding a pulse duration of 10 ms and the positive clones were selected in LBHIS kanamycin (25 µg mL−1) plates (van der Rest et al. 1999).

Fermentative production of xylonic acid by C. glutamicum transformants

For xylonic acid production, C. glutamicum was inoculated in 10 ml of liquid medium (BHI broth) in a test tube and grown overnight at 30 °C under aerobic condition with shaking at 200 rpm. An aliquot of the 10 ml culture was used to inoculate 100 ml CGXII production medium (Keilhauer et al. 1993) containing 35 g/L xylose and 5 g/L glucose as carbon sources, kanamycin (25 µg mL−1). IPTG (1 mM) induction was done along with the inoculation. Fermentation was carried out in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL production medium and incubated as described above. Samples were withdrawn at regular intervals to determine sugar consumption and xylonic acid production. Since xylB transformant was found to be the best producer, a comparison of it with C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 having xylB gene was also carried out to see whether the inbuilt araE pentose transporter in ATCC 31831 has any advantage over wild type ATCC 13032.

Media engineering by response surface methodology (RSM)

Response surface methodology was applied to identify the operating variables that have a significant effect on xylonic acid production. A Box Behnken experimental design (BBD) (Box and Behnken 1960) with four independent variables (selected based on single parameter study, data not shown) that may affect xylonic acid production, including (NH4)2SO4 (2.5–12.5 g/L), urea (4.5–18.5 g/L), xylose (30–90 g/L) and inoculum (7.5–1.125%) were studied at three levels − 1, 0 and + 1 which correspond to low, medium and high values respectively. Responses were measured as titer (g/L) of xylonic acid. The statistical as well as numerical analysis of the model was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) which included p-value, regression coefficient, effect values and F value using Minitab 17 software. Studies were performed using C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 harboring pVWEx1-xylB.

Dilute acid pretreatment of the biomass

The rice straw was crushed into fine particle (size of 10 mm) and pre-soaked in dilute acid (H2SO4) for 30 min, pretreated with 15% (w/w) biomass loading and 1% (w/w) acid concentration at 121 °C for 1 h. After cooling, the mixture was neutralized to pH 6–7 using 10 N NaOH. The liquid portion, i.e. acid pretreated liquor (APL) rich in pentose sugar (xylose) was separated from the pretreated slurry and lyophilized to concentrate to get desired xylose level which was estimated prior to the shake flask fermentation studies.

Quantification of sugars and xylonic acid in fermentation broth

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of sugars and sugar acid (xylonic acid) was performed using an automated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Prominence UFLC, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with auto-sampler, column oven and RI Detector. The monomeric sugars (xylose and glucose) were resolved with Phenomenex Rezex RPM Pb+ cation exchange monosaccharide column (300 × 7.5 mm) operated at 80 °C. MilliQ water (Millipore) with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min was used as the mobile phase. For xylonic acid detection, Phenomenex organic acid column (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 µm) operated at 55 °C was used with a mobile phase of 0.01 N H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The samples were centrifuged (13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C) and filtered using 0.2 µm filters (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, New York) for analysis.

Results

Xylose utilization and xylonic acid production by C. glutamicum transformants

Corynebacterium glutamicum recombinants expressing xylB, xylC and xylBC were constructed. The xylose dehydrogenase and xylonolactonase genes were cloned into IPTG-inducible expression vector pVWEx1 and transformed into C. glutamicum ATCC 31831. To check xylonic acid production from xylose, the C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 transformants harboring pVWEx1-xylB, pVWEx1-xylC and pVWEx1-xylBC were cultivated in CGXII medium containing 5 g/L of glucose as the carbon source for initial cell growth and 35 g/L of xylose as the substrate for xylonic acid production. Cell growth, xylose consumption and xylonic acid production were analyzed during the incubation for a desired period of interval. From analysis, it is clear that compared to the control strain with empty vector (Fig. 1a), the transformants harboring pVWEx1-xylB picked up growth very fast compared to the other transformants and utilized xylose effectively (77.2% utilization after 120 h) and resulted in maximum production of 32.5 g/L xylonic acid (Fig. 1b). The pVWEx1-xylBC harboring strain produced 26 g/L xylonic acid (Fig. 1d), whereas pVWEx1-xylC showed neither any significant xylose uptake nor xylonic acid production (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure1

Xylose consumption (35 g/L) (closed triangle), xylonic acid production (closed circle) and growth curve (open circle) of C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 (a) pVWEx1 (b) pVWEx1-xyl B (c) pVWEx1-xylC (d) pVWEx1-xyl BC respectively

Box–Behnken experimental design (BBD) and operational parameter optimization

The objective of the experimental design was medium engineering for maximum xylonic acid production. There were a total of 15 runs for optimizing the four individual parameters in the current BBD. Experimental design and xylonic acid yield are presented in Table 2. The polynomial equation obtained for the model was as below:

$$\begin{aligned} {\text{Xylonic acid }}\left( {{{\text{g}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\text{g}} {\text{L}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\text{L}}}} \right)\; = \; & - 4 8. 7 { }{-} \, 0. 4 5 {\text{ X}}_{ 1} + { 3}. 5 {\text{ X}}_{ 2} + 0. 2 20{\text{ X}}_{ 3} + { 2}.0 5 8 {\text{ X}}_{ 4} \\ & {-} \, 0.0 1 9 {\text{ X}}_{ 1}^{ 2} {-} \, 0. 2 1 3 9 {\text{ X}}_{ 2}^{ 2} {-} \, 0.0 4 2 3 {\text{ X}}_{ 3}^{ 2} {-} \, 0.0 1 9 4 3 {\text{ X}}_{ 4}^{ 2} \\ & {-} \, 0.0 7 5 {\text{ X}}_{ 1} {\text{X}}_{ 2} + \, 0.0 4 1 6 {\text{ X}}_{ 1} {\text{X}}_{ 3} {-} \, 0.0 1 1 9 {\text{ X}}_{ 1} {\text{X}}_{ 4} \\ & + \, 0. 5 2 6 {\text{ X}}_{ 2} {\text{X}}_{ 3} + \, 0.0 4 8 2 {\text{ X}}_{ 2} {\text{X}}_{ 4} {-} \, 0.00 1 2 8 {\text{ X}}_{ 3} {\text{X}}_{ 4} \\ \end{aligned}$$

where X1, X2, X3 and X4 are xylose, (NH4)2SO4, urea and inoculum concentration respectively. Maximum production efficiency (0.47 g−1 L−1 h−1) was observed with Run No.13 where the concentration of parameters was urea 11.5 g/L, xylose 60 g/L, (NH4)2SO4 7.5 g/L and inoculum 1.125% and xylonic acid titer was 56.32 g/L. It indicates that (NH4)2SO4, inoculum concentration and xylose have a significant positive effect than urea on xylonic acid yield.

Table 2 Box–Behnken experimental design matrix with experimental values of xylonic acid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 31831

Response surface curves were plotted to find out the interaction of variables and to determine the optimum level of each variable for maximum response. The contour plot showing the interaction between a pair of factors on xylonic acid yield is given in Fig. 2a–f. Major interactions studied are of inoculum and xylose concentration (a), xylose and urea concentration (b), (NH4)2SO4 and urea concentration (c), effect of inoculum and (NH4)2SO4 concentration (d), effect of (NH4)2SO4 and xylose concentration (e) and the interaction of inoculum and urea concentration (f).

Fig. 2
figure2

Response surface methodology-contour plots showing the effect of various parameters on xylonic acid production by C.glutamicum ATCC 31831. a Effect of inoculum and xylose. b Effect of xylose and urea. c Effect of (NH4)2SO4 and urea. d Effect of inoculum and (NH4)2SO4. e Effect of (NH4)2SO4 and xylose f Effect of inoculum and urea

The ANOVA of response for xylonic acid is shown in Table 3. The R2 value explains the variability in the xylonic acid yield associated with the experimental factors to the extent of 97.48%.

Table 3 Analysis of variance for xylonic acid production using C. glutamicum ATCC 31831

Role of araE pentose transporter for enhanced uptake of xylose and xylonic acid production

Using the designed medium standardized for C. glutamicum ATCC 31831, which possesses an arabinose and xylose transporter encoded by araE, a comparative production study was carried out with recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 13032. Both the strains grew well in the CGXII production medium and metabolized xylose to xylonic acid. After 120 h fermentation, the recombinant strain, ATCC 13032 produced 50.66 g/L of xylonic acid whereas ATCC 31831 produced 56.32 g/L (Fig. 3). It was observed that better uptake of the pentose sugar was also exhibited by C. glutamicum ATCC 31831, i.e., 75% consumption compared to 60% by ATCC 13032 after 120 h fermentation and same the case with culture growth where ATCC 31831 showed better growth (10× dilution of culture broth for spectrophotometric reading (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 3
figure3

Xylonic acid production by C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 (open bar) and C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 (closed bar) harbouring plasmid pVWEx1-xylB

Xylonic acid from rice straw hydrolysate

Fermentation was carried out in rice straw hydrolysate using C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 (pVWEx1-xylB). The strain could grow in different xylose concentrations (of 20, 40, and 60 g/L) in rice straw hydrolysate, and after 120 h fermentation, maximum titer obtained was 42.94 g/L xylonic acid from 60 g/L xylose (Fig. 4). A production yield of 58.48% xylonic acid in hydrolysate is remarkable for sugar acid production with engineered strain of C. glutamicum which is quite tolerant to the inhibitors present in the hydrolysate.

Fig. 4
figure4

Xylose utilization (open symbols) and xylonic acid production (closed symbols) by C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 (pVWEx1-xylB) in rice straw hydrolysate containing different concentrations of xylose 20 g/L (open diamond), 40 g/L (open square) and 60 g/L (open circle). Xylonic acid production from 20 g/L xylose (closed diamond), 40 g/L xylose (closed square) and 60 g/L xylose (closed circle)

Discussion

Heterologous expression of genes for the production of varied value-added chemicals were successfully carried out in C. glutamicum, for example, the production of amino acids, sugar alcohol, organic acid, diamines, glycolate and 1,5-diaminopentane (Buschke et al. 2013; Meiswinkel et al. 2013; Zahoor et al. 2014; Pérez-García et al. 2016; Dhar et al. 2016). C. glutamicum being a versatile industrial microbe and the availability of genetic engineering tools makes it a rapid and rational manipulation host for diverse platform chemicals. Most corynebacteria are known not to utilize xylose as carbon source. The absence of xylose metabolizing genes restricts the growth of Corynebacterium in pentose rich medium. To develop an efficient bioconversion system for xylonic acid synthesis, the genes of Caulobacter crescentus were expressed in C. glutamicum. The resulting transformants C. glu-pVWEx1-xylB and C.glu-pVWEx1-xylBC were able to grow in mineral medium containing xylose and converted it into corresponding pentonic acid.

Xylose can be metabolized in four different routes (I) The oxido-reductase pathway, (II) The isomerase pathway, (III) The Weimberg pathway, an oxidative pathway and (IV) The Dahms pathway (Cabulong et al. 2018). Xylose once inside the cell gets converted to xylonolactone and then into xylonic acid on the expression of two genes namely, xylB (xylose dehydrogenase) and xylC (xylonolactonase). These two enzymes are involved in both the Weimberg and Dahms pathway where xylose is metabolized to xylonic acid (Brüsseler et al. 2019). In the present study, it is observed that only the xylose dehydrogenase enzyme activity is good enough for xylonic acid production. Without the dehydrogenase activity, the lactonase activity alone cannot do the conversion of xylose to xylonic acid. Further, the xylonolactonase expression along with xylose dehydrogenase resulted in xylonic acid production but not that efficient as dehydrogenase alone with the case of C. glutamicum. It is reported that, xylonolactone once formed can be converted to xylonic acid either by the spontaneous oxidation of lactone or through the enzymatic hydrolysis of xylonolactonase enzyme (Buchert and Viikari 1988). Corynebacterium glutamicum being an aerobic organism, direct oxidation of xylonolactone to xylonic acid is more favorable inside the cell. Previous studies have also shown that xylose dehydrogenase (xylB) activity alone can result in the production of xylonic acid (Yim et al. 2017).

Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 31831 grew on pentose as the sole carbon source. The gene cluster responsible for pentose utilization comprised a six-cistron transcriptional unit with a total length of 7.8 kb. The sequence of the C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 ara gene cluster containing gene araE, encodes pentose transporter, facilitates the efficient uptake of pentose sugar (Kawaguchi et al. 2009). Previous studies have also reported the role of araE pentose transporter in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 31831 and its exploitation for the production of commodity chemicals like 3HP and ethanol (Becker et al. 2018). In the present study, Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 31831 with an inbuilt araE pentose transporter exhibited effectual consumption of xylose as well as its conversion to xylonic acid. Further studies have to be done to explore the role of the same araE pentose transporter as an exporter for xylonic acid.

Micrococcus spp., Pseudomonas, Kluveromyces lactis, Caulobacter, Enterobacter, Gluconobacter, Klebsiella and Pseudoduganella danionis (ISHIZAKI et al. 1973; Buchert et al. 1988; Buchert and Viikari 1988; Toivari et al. 2011; Wiebe et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016; Sundar Lekshmi et al. 2019) are the non-recombinant strains reported for xylonic acid production. Among which Gluconobacter oxydans is the prominent wild-type strain exhibits higher titers of xylonic acid up to 100 g L−1 (Toivari et al. 2012). Although these strains are capable of producing xylonic acid from pure sugar, they fail to perform as an industrial strain since some are opportunistic pathogen grade and they are not tested in hydrolysate medium may be due to their lower tolerance towards lignocellulosic inhibitors. There was an earlier report on recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 produced 6.23 g L−1 of xylonic acid from 20 g L−1 of xylan (Yim et al. 2017). In this study they have employed multiple modules, (i) xylan degradation module (ii) conversion module from xylose to xylonic acid by expression of xdh gene and (iii) xylose transport module by expression of xylE gene, and optimized gene expression introducing promoters (Yim et al. 2017). The product titers with C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 presented in this study are comparable with other wild type and recombinant strains (Table 4) and the volumetric productivity in the feed phase can outperform the titers published employing the recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 13032.

Table 4 Comparison of xylonic acid production and productivity by the best xylonic acid producers

Media engineering was carried out with the statistical tool response surface methodology (RSM) for the enhanced production of xylonic acid. The Box–Behnken model with experimental values containing 15 runs was designed for the optimization study. RSM aided to narrow down the most influencing parameters and its optimization on xylonic acid production. The engineered strain produced up to 56.3 g/L of xylonic acid and is characterized by high volumetric productivity and maximum product yield of 76.67% under optimized conditions applying defined xylose/glucose mixtures in synthetic medium. One of the major challenges is the range of acidic and furan aldehyde compounds released from lignocellulosic pre-treatment. Here, the recombinant C. glutamicum ATCC 31831 could resist the inhibitors present in rice straw hydrolysate and produced xylonic acid nearly to 58.5% of the maximum possible yield.

The challenges involve getting sufficient xylose after pretreatment and also the separation of xylonic acid from the fermented broth. For the industrial application, downstream processing of xylonic acid is very important. Ethanol precipitation and product recovery by extraction are the two interesting options described for the purification of xylonic acid from the fermentation broth (Liu et al. 2012). With this industrially streamlined recombinant strain a highly profitable bioprocess to produce xylonic acid from lignocellulosic biomass as a cost-efficient second-generation substrate is well within the reach. The one-step conversion of xylose to xylonic acid and the bioprocess developed in the present study favors pentose sugar utilization in rice straw in a straight forward and cost-effective method. The proof of concept showed the simultaneous utilization of biomass-derived sugars (C5 and C6) and it has to be investigated in detail.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

References

  1. Abe S, Takayama K-I, Kinoshita S (1967) Taxonomical studies on glutamic acid-producing bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 13:279–301. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.13.279

  2. Baritugo K-A, Kim HT, David Y, Choi J, Hong SH, Jeong KJ, Choi JH, Joo JC, Park SJ (2018) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for fermentative production of chemicals in biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:3915–3937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8896-6

  3. Becker J, Rohles CM, Wittmann C (2018) Metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum for bio-based production of chemicals, fuels, materials, and healthcare products. Metab Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.07.008

  4. Box GEP, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912

  5. Brüsseler C, Späth A, Sokolowsky S, Marienhagen J (2019) Alone at last!—heterologous expression of a single gene is sufficient for establishing the five-step Weimberg pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng Commun 9:e00090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00090

  6. Buchert J, Viikari L (1988) The role of xylonolactone in xylonic acid production by Pseudomonas fragi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 27:333–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251763

  7. Buchert J, Puls J, Poutanen K (1988) Comparison of Pseudomonas fragi and Gluconobacter oxydans for production of xylonic acid from hemicellulose hydrolyzates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 28:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268197

  8. Buschke N, Becker J, Schäfer R, Kiefer P, Biedendieck R, Wittmann C (2013) Systems metabolic engineering of xylose-utilizing Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of 1,5-diaminopentane. Biotechnol J 8:557–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201200367

  9. Byong-Wa C, Benita D, Macuch PJ, Debbie W, Charlotte P, Ara J (2006) The development of cement and concrete additive. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 131:645–658. https://doi.org/10.1385/abab:131:1:645

  10. Cabulong RB, Lee W-K, Bañares AB, Ramos KRM, Nisola GM, Valdehuesa KNG, Chung W-J (2018) Engineering Escherichia coli for glycolic acid production from d-xylose through the Dahms pathway and glyoxylate bypass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:2179–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8744-8

  11. Cao Y, Xian M, Zou H, Zhang H (2013) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of xylonate. PLoS ONE 8:e67305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067305

  12. Choi JW, Jeon EJ, Jeong KJ (2019) Recent advances in engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for utilization of hemicellulosic biomass. Curr Opin Biotechnol 57:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.11.004

  13. Chung CT, Miller RH (1993) Preparation and storage of competent Escherichia coli cells. Methods Enzymol 218:621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(93)18045-E

  14. de Arruda PV, de Cássia Lacerda Brambilla Rodrigu R, da Silva DDV, de Almeida Felipe M (2011) Evaluation of hexose and pentose in pre-cultivation of Candida guilliermondii on the key enzymes for xylitol production in sugarcane hemicellulosic hydrolysate. Biodegradation 22:815–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9397-1

  15. Dhar KS, Wendisch VF, Nampoothiri KM (2016) Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for xylitol production from lignocellulosic pentose sugars. J Biotechnol 230:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.011

  16. Gopinath V, Meiswinkel TM, Wendisch VF, Nampoothiri KM (2011) Amino acid production from rice straw and wheat bran hydrolysates by recombinant pentose-utilizing Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:985–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3478-x

  17. Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8

  18. Heider SAE, Wendisch VF (2015) Engineering microbial cell factories: metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum with a focus on non-natural products. Biotechnol J 10:1170–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400590

  19. Hirasawa T, Shimizu H (2016) Recent advances in amino acid production by microbial cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 42:133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.017

  20. Ishizaki H, Ihara T, Yoshitake J, Shimamura M, Imai T (1973) d-Xylonic acid production by Enterobacter cloacae. J Agric Chem Soc Jpn 47:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.47.755

  21. Johanna B, Liisa V (1988) Oxidative d-xylose metabolism of Gluconobacter oxydans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29:375–379

  22. Kawaguchi H, Sasaki M, Vertes AA, Inui M, Yukawa H (2009) Identification and functional analysis of the gene cluster for l-arabinose utilization in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3419–3429. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02912-08

  23. Keilhauer C, Eggeling L, Sahm H (1993) Isoleucine synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum: molecular analysis of the ilvB-ilvN-ilvC operon. J Bacteriol 175:5595–5603. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.175.17.5595-5603.1993

  24. Kinoshita S, Udaka S, Shimono M (2004) Studies on the amino acid fermentation Part 1 Production of l-glutamic acid by various microorganisms. J Gen Appl Microbiol 50(6):331–343

  25. Lin T-H, Huang C-F, Guo G-L, Hwang W-S, Huang S-L (2012) Pilot-scale ethanol production from rice straw hydrolysates using xylose-fermenting Pichia stipitis. Bioresour Technol 116:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.089

  26. Liu H, Valdehuesa KNG, Nisola GM, Ramos KRM, Chung W-J (2012) High yield production of d-xylonic acid from d-xylose using engineered Escherichia coli. Bioresour Technol 115:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.065

  27. Matano C, Meiswinkel TM, Wendisch VF (2014) Amino acid production from rice straw hydrolyzates. In: Wheat and rice in disease prevention and health. pp 493–505

  28. Meijnen JP, De Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ (2009) Establishment of oxidative D-xylose metabolism in Pseudomonas putida S12. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2784–2791. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02713-08

  29. Meiswinkel TM, Gopinath V, Lindner SN, Nampoothiri KM, Wendisch VF (2013) Accelerated pentose utilization by Corynebacterium glutamicum for accelerated production of lysine, glutamate, ornithine and putrescine. Microb Biotechnol 6:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12001

  30. Mussatto SI, Teixeira JA (2010) Lignocellulose as raw material in fermentation processes. Microbial Biotechnol 2:897–907

  31. Nygård Y, Toivari MH, Penttilä M, Ruohonen L, Wiebe MG (2011) Bioconversion of d-xylose to d-xylonate with Kluyveromyces lactis. Metab Eng 13:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.001

  32. Ou MS, Ingram LO, Shanmugam KT (2011) L(+)-Lactic acid production from non-food carbohydrates by thermotolerant Bacillus coagulans. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:599–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0796-4

  33. Pérez-García F, Peters-Wendisch P, Wendisch VF (2016) Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for fast production of l-lysine and l-pipecolic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:8075–8090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7682-6

  34. Peters-Wendisch PG, Schiel B, Wendisch VF, Katsoulidis E, Möckel B, Sahm H, Eikmanns BJ (2001) Pyruvate carboxylase is a major bottleneck for glutamate and lysine production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Mol Biol Biotechnol 3(2):295–300

  35. Raganati F, Olivieri G, Götz P, Marzocchella A, Salatino P (2015) Butanol production from hexoses and pentoses by fermentation of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Anaerobe 34:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.05.008

  36. Sakai S, Tsuchida Y, Okino S, Ichihashi O, Kawaguchi H, Watanabe T, Inui M, Yukawa H (2007) Effect of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on growth of and ethanol production by growth-arrested Corynebacterium glutamicum R. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2349–2353. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02880-06

  37. Sambrook BJ, Maccallum P, Russell D (2006) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual to order or request additional information. Mol Clon 1:1–3

  38. Stephens C, Christen B, Fuchs T, Sundaram V, Watanabe K, Jenal U (2007) Genetic analysis of a novel pathway for d-xylose metabolism in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 189:2181–2185. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01438-06

  39. Sundar Lekshmi MS, Susmitha A, Soumya MP, Keerthi Sasikumar, Nampoothiri Madhavan K (2019) Bioconversion of d-xylose to d-xylonic acid by Pseudoduganella danionis. Indian J Exp Biol 57:821–824

  40. Toivari MH, Ruohonen L, Richard P, Penttilä M, Wiebe MG (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered to produce D-xylonate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:751–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2787-9

  41. Toivari MH, Penttil M, Ruohonen L, Wiebe MG, Nyg Y (2011) Bioconversion of d-xylose to d-xylonate with Kluyveromyces lactis. Metab Eng 13:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.001

  42. Toivari M, Nygård Y, Kumpula EP, Vehkomäki ML, Benčina M, Valkonen M, Maaheimo H, Andberg M, Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M, Wiebe MG (2012) Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioconversion of d-xylose to d-xylonate. Metab Eng 14:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.03.002

  43. van der Rest ME, Lange C, Molenaar D (1999) A heat shock following electroporation induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:541–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051557

  44. Wang C, Wei D, Zhang Z, Wang D, Shi J, Kim CH, Jiang B, Han Z, Hao J (2016) Production of xylonic acid by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:10055–10063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7825-9

  45. Wei Niu, Mapitso Molefe N, Frost JW (2003) Microbial synthesis of the energetic material precursor 1,2,4-butanetriol. J Am Chem Soc 125:12998–12999

  46. Wendisch VF, Brito LF, Gil Lopez M, Hennig G, Pfeifenschneider J, Sgobba E, Veldmann KH (2016) The flexible feedstock concept in industrial biotechnology: metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and yeast strains for access to alternative carbon sources. J Biotechnol 234:139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.022

  47. Wiebe MG, Nygård Y, Oja M, Andberg M, Ruohonen L, Koivula A, Penttilä M, Toivari M (2015) A novel aldose-aldose oxidoreductase for co-production of d-xylonate and xylitol from d-xylose with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:9439–9447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6878-5

  48. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA (2009) Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:907–914. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02268-08

  49. Yim SS, Choi JW, Lee SH, Jeon EJ, Chung WJ, Jeong KJ (2017) Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for consolidated conversion of hemicellulosic biomass into xylonic acid. Biotechnol J 12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700040

  50. Zahoor A, Otten A, Wendisch VF (2014) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for glycolate production. J Biotechnol 192:366–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.12.020

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author LS acknowledges the Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) by Council of Scientific and Innovative Research (CSIR), New Delhi. KMN and VFW acknowledge the financial assistance from DBT, New Delhi BMBF, and Germany to work on Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Funding

The study is funded by DBT, New Delhi and BMBF, Germany under Indo German collaboration.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LS, the first author executed majority of the work and wrote the article.SA, SH and KS contributed in the molecular biology aspects of the work while DR involved in the RSM studies. VFW helped in critical reading of manuscript. KMN, the corresponding author who conceived and designed the research and helped to prepare the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Madhavan Nampoothiri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. This article doesn’t contain any studies performed with animals or humans by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare(s) that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundar, M.S.L., Susmitha, A., Rajan, D. et al. Heterologous expression of genes for bioconversion of xylose to xylonic acid in Corynebacterium glutamicum and optimization of the bioprocess. AMB Expr 10, 68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01003-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Corynebacterium glutamicum
  • Biomass
  • Heterologous expression
  • Response surface methodology (RSM)
  • Xylose
  • Xylonic acid
  • Xylose dehydrogenase