Open Access

The biodiversity of Lactobacillus spp. from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese and antibacterial evaluation based on bacteriocin-encoding genes

  • Fahimeh Azizi1,
  • Mohammad B. Habibi Najafi1Email author and
  • Mohammad R. Edalatian Dovom1
AMB Express20177:176

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0474-2

Received: 28 January 2017

Accepted: 5 September 2017

Published: 18 September 2017

Abstract

Lactobacilli, as the largest group of lactic acid bacteria, produce large amounts of antimicrobial metabolites such as organic acids, fatty acids, ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and bacteriocin, which inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and increase shelf life of food. The aim of this study was to identify the Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese and to detect the presence of bacteriocin genes in the isolated Lactobacillus strains exhibiting antimicrobial activity. For this purpose, 6 Motal cheese samples from Dasht-e-Moghan region, Iran, were subjected to microbial characterization. Nineteen Lactobacillus spp. were isolated and subsequently identified based on biochemical and molecular methods. According to the sequencing of isolates, Lactobacillus spp. consisted primarily of Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus buchneri. The identified isolates were then evaluated for antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923. The results of PCR analysis using specific primers of genes encoding Bacteriocin, revealed the presence of Plantaricin A and Plantaricin EF in all Lactobacillus plantarum isolates and Brevicin 174A in 5 of Lactobacillus brevis isolates, whereas the gene encoding Pediocin PA-1 was not observed in any of examined isolates. It is therefore concluded that bacteriocinogenic isolates could be recommended as suitable candidates to be used as starter, adjunct-starter or antimicrobial agents for production of fermented and non-fermented products.

Keywords

Antimicrobial activity Bacteriocin Biphasic approach Cheese Lactobacillus Traditional dairy products

Introduction

Conversion of carbohydrate to lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) may be considered as the most important fermentation in food industry. The characteristic aroma, flavor, and texture of fermented foods (e.g., dairy, meat, and vegetables) are often due to growth of these bacteria. (Habibi-Najafi and Lee 2007; Hayaloglu et al. 2002; Wada et al. 2009). Some strains of LAB isolated from dairy and other fermented products may contribute to the safety and quality of foods owing to possessing antimicrobial agents. The bactericidal effects of such agents on wide range of pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus have been studied (Cintas et al. 2001; De Vuyst and Leroy 2007). On the other hand, some strains of LAB play a vital role in the digestive tract by producing antimicrobial metabolites such as bacteriocins and prevent the growth of pathogenic and infection microorganisms (Castro et al. 2011; Ghanbari et al. 2013; Parada et al. 2007; Ahmed et al. 2013; Mahrous et al. 2013). Bacteriocins are divided into two main classes, lantibiotic such as Nisin (class I), and nonlantibiotic such as Pediocin and PlantaricinEF (class II) (Noda et al. 2015).

In recent years, bacteriocins produced by LAB have been considered as food bio-preservatives due to the fact that LAB are among those microorganisms which generally regarded as safe (GRAS) (Leroy and De Vuyst 2004; Molloy et al. 2011; Verma et al. 2014).

Genome sequencing plays an important role in the accurate identification of bacteriocinogenic LAB (Ortolani et al. 2010). The genes encoding bacteriocin are located in operon clusters, which may be placed on the chromosome (such as PlantaricinST31), or plasmids (such as Plantaricin423) or transposons (such as Nisin A) (Knoll et al. 2008; Todorov 2009). Up to now, different types of bacteriocin locus such as Plantaricin, Pediocin PA-1/AcH, Sakacin674, SakacinP and BavaricinA have been identified from different strains of L. plantarum (C11, WCFS1, NC8, J23 and J51), L. plantarum WHE 92, L. sake 674, L. sake LTH673 and L. bavaricus MI401, respectively (Remiger et al. 1996; Xie et al. 2011).

Different types of cheese have been produced traditionally from various sources of milk in Iran. Traditional Motal cheese is produced locally in Dasht-e-Moghan from raw sheep’s milk without adding any starter culture. This type of cheese contained high fat and salt with friable texture. The aging and ripening occurs inside the sheep skin (Veljovic et al. 2007). In regards to the increasing demand for selection of microbial strains with protective properties, the aim of this study was to identify the Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese and to detect the presence of genes encoding Plantaricin A, Plantaricin EF, Pediocin PA-1 and Brevicin 174A in the isolated Lactobacillus strains exhibiting antimicrobial activity to be used for commercial production as well as improvement the quality and safety of fermented food products,

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Six samples of traditional Motal cheese were collected from rural areas in Dasht-e-Moghan, Iran, and were immediately transported to the laboratory under refrigerated conditions for analysis.

Microbiological analysis

Portions of 25 g of each sample were transferred under sterile conditions to stomacher bags and mixed with 225 ml sterile 2% (w/v) citrate sodium solution in a stomacher (Seaward Medical, London SE1 1PP, UK) for 5 min. Serial dilutions (10−1–10−8) were then prepared for each sample. For total count of bacteria, 1 ml of each dilution was pure plated in a plate containing PCA medium (Merck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and was incubated at 35 °C for 48 h and the number of colonies on each plate with 30–300 colonies were counted. For enumeration of total LAB, 0.1 ml from each dilution was spread-plated on MRS medium (Merck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In order to provide anaerobic conditions, jars with Anaerocult type A gaspak were used (Merck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Counting of total coliforms was performed on VRBA (Merck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), incubated for 24 h at 35 °C. The search for Staphylococci was viewed on BP medium containing Potassium Tellurite and egg yolk and incubation was done at 35 °C for 24–48 h (Antonsson et al. 2003; Şengül 2006; Turgay and Erbilir 2006; Guetouache and Guessas 2015).

Isolation and phenotypic identification of LAB

To obtain pure cultures, colonies were randomly selected from the surface of each medium and streak plating was performed on the same medium (Guetouache and Guessas 2015). After implementation the gram reaction and catalase activity on isolates, only gram-positive and catalase-negative isolates were selected for further analysis by the following phenotypic tests: growth at 15 and 45 °C in MRS broth, growth at pH 4.4 and pH 9.6 in MRS broth, salt tolerance: growth with 6.5 and 18% NaCl in MRS broth and production of carbon dioxide from glucose by cultivation isolates in tubes with MRS containing a Durham’s tubes (Nikolic et al. 2008; Guetouache and Guessas 2015). All gram-positive and catalase-negative isolates were stored at −80 °C in MRS broth containing 15% glycerol (v/v).

Molecular identification of isolates

DNA isolation

To extract bacterial genome, streak plating from each isolate on MRS agar was performed and then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. A loop of grown colony was then transferred to MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h for re-activation. Cells were then harvested, and the DNA extraction was performed with the GenElute™ Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Electrophoresis was performed on 1% agarose gel in TBE.1X buffer and photographed under UV light.

16S rRNA sequencing

Primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were used for amplification of the gene 16S rRNA (Alegría et al. 2009). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out in a thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) in a total volume of 20 μl containing10 μl 2 × PCR master mix (Amplicon, Denmark), 1 ml of the mixed primers 27F and 1492R (concentration 10 pmol/μl), 8 μl nuclease free deionized water and 1 μl template DNA, running under the following temperature program: initial denaturation of DNA for 5 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 50 s at 55 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C; and final extension for 10 min at 72 °C (Emerenini et al. 2013). 5 µl aliquots of the PCR products with 1 µl loading buffer were analyzed by electrophoresis using a 1% (w/v) agarose gel in Tris Boric acid EDTA (TBE. 1X) buffer at 100 V for 45 min. The gel was then placed in Gel doc (Cleaver scientific Ltd) to detect the presence a band of 1500 bp. The size of the DNA fragments was estimated using a GeneRuler 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (Fermentase, Canada).

GenElute™ PCR clean-up column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) was used for purification before sending the extracted DNA for sequencing, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An average of 850 bp nucleotides for each sequence from each side were read and compared with the databases using the BLAST program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Isolates with 98% or higher similarity in sequences were identified as the same species (Stackebrandt and Goebel 1994; Palys et al. 1997).

Phylogenetic tree construction

Sequence similarities of the studied lactobacilli isolates was predicted using Mega 5.1 software. The 16S rRNA sequences of isolates were multiple aligned using the ClustalW algorithm. Constructions were carried out using UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) method by means of taking 1000 as bootstrap value (Bunesova et al. 2014).

Detection of antibacterial activity

Agar spot test

Isolates were evaluated for production of antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 as indicator microorganisms. To perform this test, 2.5 μl overnight cultures of each isolate was spotted on MRS agar and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 48 h. 10 µl of each indicator strain, grown in the BHI broth, was then added to 7 ml sterile soft agar (BHI broth + 0.75% agar). The inoculated soft agar with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was poured onto the spotted MRS agar. These plates were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. The presence of clear halo around the inoculated spot of each indicator bacteria lawn reflects the no growth of the indicator microorganism and thus the possessing of antimicrobial activity of examined isolate (Alegría et al. 2010; Al-Otaibi 2012).

Well diffusion agar test

In this method, the isolates that demonstrated antimicrobial properties were tested based on the presence of the clear halo. The inoculated cultures of the positive isolates in terms of antibacterial activity were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000×g. The pH of supernatant was measured and adjusted to neutral pH (6.5–7.0) with NaOH 1 N and was then filtrated by 0.45 μm pore size filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Aliquots of 30 μl from 16 h cultures of indicator bacteria were diluted equivalent to 0.5 McFarland and were inoculated to 15 ml of BHI culture consisting of 1% molten agar. Aliquots of 30 μl filtered cell-free supernatant (CFS) of isolates were transferred to wells with a diameter of 6 mm, made with a sterile puncher. Plates were incubated for 48 h in 37 °C to investigate the antibacterial activity and halo formation (zone of growth inhibition). Isolates with clear zones of growth inhibition with a diameter more than 1 mm around wells were considered as positive (Alegría et al. 2010; Bettache et al. 2012).

Identification of genes encoding bacteriocin production

The identification was performed using PCR or molecular method. The specific primers of bacteriocin used in this study are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Primers used throughout this study and their amplification details

Name

Sequence (5′ → 3′)

Size amplicon

Annealing temperature

References

Brevicin 174A-F

GTCTTAAATGCTAGGCTTGTCA

766

56

Noda et al. (2015)

Brevicin 174A-R

CTGGCAAGACAAACGGTTAG

plnA-F

TAGAAATAATTCCTCCGTACTTC

573

55

Xie et al. (2011)

PlnA-R

ATTAGCGATGTAGTGTCATCCA

plnEF-F

TATGAATTGAAAGGGTCCGT

516

54

Xie et al. (2011)

plnEF-R

GTTCCAAATAACATCATACAAGG

Pediocin PA-1-F

AAAGATACTGCGTTGATAGG

1120

50

Xie et al. (2011)

Pediocin PA-1-R

GAGAAGCCATGCTGAAAG

According to the bacteriocins sequences of Lactobacillus brevis 174 A (GenBank accession no. LC062087), Lactobacillus plantarum C11 (GenBank accession no. X9443) and Pediococcus acidilactici PAC1.0 (GenBank accession no. M83924), four sets of primers were designed for specific targets using CLC Main Workbench 5 and Primer Premier 5 software and prepared by Macrogen Company (Wada et al. 2009; Noda et al. 2015). After adding each component of the reaction mixture following the kit manufacturer’s instruction, microtubes were placed in the thermocycler and the temperature program was set according to the type of bacteriocin.

Amplification of plnA, plnEF and Pediocin PA-1 genes was performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at different temperatures as shown in Table 1 for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min (Xie et al. 2011).

PCR of Brevicin 174A gene was conducted under the following conditions: 1 cycle of 5 min at 96 °C, 15 s at 58 °C and 30 s at 72 °C followed by 29 cycles of 1 min at 96 °C, 15 s at 58 °C and 30 s at 72 °C, and a 7 min final extension at 72 °C. The amplicons were purified using a purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and subjected to DNA sequencing (Bioneer, Korea) (Wada et al. 2009; Xie et al. 2011; Noda et al. 2015).

Results

Microbiological analysis

The mean microbial counts of all Motal cheese samples are reported in Table 2. The total average microbiota of all cheese samples was 14.13 × 104 cfu g− 1. The microbiological analysis showed that the total average of Staphylococcus aureus and coliforms in six cheese samples was about 0.19 × 104 and 0.13 × 104 cfu g−1respectively. The average total counts of mesophilic LAB in aerobic and anaerobic conditions in all cheese samples was 6.6 × 104 and 7.45 × 104 cfu g− 1. Samples A and C showed the highest microbial population density on MRS (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of microbiological analysis of Motal cheese

Sample

Count (cfu g− 1)

Total count

LAB (aerobic)

LAB (anaerobic)

S. aureus

Coliforms

A

3 × 105

5 × 104

1 × 105

ND

ND

B

2 × 105

3 × 104

1 × 105

9 × 103

2 × 103

C

3 × 105

3 × 105

2 × 105

2 × 103

6 × 103

D

3 × 103

3 × 103

5 × 103

ND

ND

E

4 × 104

1 × 104

4 × 104

5 × 102

ND

F

5 × 103

3 × 103

2 × 103

ND

ND

Morphological and biochemical properties of Lactobacillus strains

A total of 64 colonies grown on MRS under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C were randomly isolated for further studies. The colonies were first morphologically observed under light microscope. Twenty-nine cocci and 35 rod were identified. Nineteen out of 35 rod-shaped gram-positive, and catalase negative bacteria were selected as Lactobacilli based on biochemical analysis (Table 3) (Pyar and Peh 2014). Fifteen isolates produced CO2 were considered heterofermentative and four strains as homofermentative.
Table 3

Physiological characteristics and preliminary identification of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Motal cheese

Physiological tests

Preliminary identification of Lactobacillus spp.

+

Growth at 15 °C

19

0

Growth at 45 °C

0

19

Growth in medium with 6.5% NaCl

19

0

Growth in medium with 18% NaCl

 

19

Growth at pH 4.4

19

0

Growth at pH 9.6

0

19

Production of CO2 from glucose

15

4

+ Number of isolates with positive reaction; − number of isolates with negative reaction

PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene

One of the general methods used to identify and differentiate LAB in dairy foods and products is the analysis of the 16S rRNA sequence (Zdolec and Filipović 2012). PCR using 27F and 1492R specific primers of 16S rRNA locus, produces amplicons in size of 1500 bp (results not shown). Nucleotide sequence of 16S rRNA is a suitable source for identification of bacteria isolates and phylogenetic tree construction (Kermanshahi and Peymanfar 2012). Table 4 illustrate Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum species isolated form Motal cheese.
Table 4

Identities of pure isolates

Strain

Closest relative

Identity (%)

GenBank

accession no.

M1

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572375

M2

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572376

M3

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572377

M4

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572378

M5

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572379

M6

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572380

M7

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572381

M8

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572382

M9

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572383

M10

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572384

M11

Lactobacillus brevis

99

KX572385

M12

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572386

M13

Lactobacillus brevis

100

KX572387

M14

Lactobacillus buchneri

99

KX572388

M15

Lactobacillus casei

100

KX572389

M16

Lactobacillus plantarum

100

KX572390

M17

Lactobacillus plantarum

100

KX572391

M18

Lactobacillus plantarum

99

KX572392

M19

Lactobacillus plantarum

100

KX572393

After cultivation, a varied set of isolates were detected using both phenotypic methods and PCR analysis of 16S rRNA (Randazzo et al. 2002). Despite being a small collection of isolated Lactobacillus species, Lactobacillus brevis species was the dominant species among the identified isolates using molecular methods in this collection.

Phylogenetic tree construction of isolates

To infer the evolutionary relationship of identified Lactobacillus spp. a phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequence analyses was obtained using neighbor joining method (Fig. 1). The accession number for each sequence is placed between brackets.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequence analyses, showing the phylogenetic placement of representative strains isolated from Motal cheese

In the phylogenetic tree built, all of the investigated isolates were well clustered into four batches and six sub-batches representing four species of identified Lactobacillus. These species comprised Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus casei strains, respectively.

Antibacterial activity

Agar spot assay

The effect of antimicrobial compounds produced by investigated isolates was performed in this method by spotted colonies on the bed of three indicator bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Listeria innocua ATCC 33090, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 in BHI medium (Alegría et al. 2010).

Based on the results presented in Table 5, indicator bacteria Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090, were inhibited by 15, 5 and 10 isolates of Lactobacillus spp., respectively. These results indicated that Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was more sensitive to antimicrobial agents produced by examined isolates, compared to the other two indicators.
Table 5

Inhibition activity of isolated Lactobacillus genus isolates against indicators using the deferred spot assay

Lactobacillus species isolates

Indicator strain

Staphylococcus aureus

Listeria innocoa

E. coli

ATCC25923

ATCC33090

ATCC 25922

Lactobacillus brevis M1

+a

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M2

(+)

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M3

Lactobacillus brevis M4

(+)

+

Lactobacillus brevis M5

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M6

+

Lactobacillus brevis M7

+

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M8

+

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M9

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M10

+

+

Lactobacillus brevis M11

(+)

Lactobacillus brevis M12

++

++

++

Lactobacillus brevis M13

Lactobacillus buchneri M14

(+)

Lactobacillus casei M15

Lactobacillus plantarum M16

+

Lactobacillus plantarum M17

++

++

(+)

Lactobacillus plantarum M18

++

++

++

Lactobacillus plantarum M19

++

++

++

aThe number of crosses in the test is related to the diameter of the inhibition halo; in parenthesis, weak inhibition

Well diffusion assay

Based on the results shown in Table 6, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090, were the most sensitive and resistant indicator bacteria to antimicrobial compounds produced by identified Lactobacilli isolates of Motal cheese.
Table 6

Antagonistic activity (well assay) of Lactobacillus genus isolates against indicator bacteria

Lactobacillus species isolates

The diameter of indicator bacteria

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923

Listeria innocoa ATCC33090

E. coli ATCC 25922

Lactobacillus brevis M1

1.7

1.1

Lactobacillus brevis M2

1.2

Lactobacillus brevis M4

Lactobacillus brevis M5

Lactobacillus brevis M6

1.1

Lactobacillus brevis M7

1.2

Lactobacillus brevis M8

1.7

Lactobacillus brevis M9

Lactobacillus brevis M10

2.8

1.5

Lactobacillus brevis M11

Lactobacillus brevis M12

3.3

2.9

4.5

Lactobacillus buchneri M14

Lactobacillus plantarum M16

1.7

Lactobacillus plantarum M17

3.4

2

1.2

Lactobacillus plantarum M18

4.5

3.2

4.3

Lactobacillus plantarum M19

6

3.7

4.8

Detection of bacteriocin structural genes

In order to detect the presence of genes encoding bacteriocin, PCR reactions were performed using four sets of specific primers; Plantaricin A, Plantaricin EF, Brevicin 174A and Pediocin PA-1. Products of 573, 596 and 766 bp were detected using specific primers of plnA, plnEF and bre174A, respectively. However, no DNA fragment was amplified using the specific primer of Pediocin PA-1 (Table 7).
Table 7

PCR amplification of bacteriocin genes from Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis Motal cheese isolates

Bacteriocinogenic isolates

Bacteriocin gene

PlnA

PlnEF

Pediocin PA-1

Bre174A

Lactobacillus plantarum M16

+

+

 

Lactobacillus plantarum M17

+

+

 

Lactobacillus plantarum M18

+

+

 

Lactobacillus plantarum M19

+

+

 

Lactobacillus brevis M1

   

+

Lactobacillus brevis M2

    

Lactobacillus brevis M6

    

Lactobacillus brevis M7

   

+

Lactobacillus brevis M8

   

+

Lactobacillus brevis M10

   

+

Lactobacillus brevis M12

   

+

(+) gene present (−) no presence of gene, blank not performed PCR for determine that carried genes bacteriocin

According to Fig. 2, plnEF gene was presented in Lactobacillus plantarumM16, M17, M18 and M19. Also, the performed PCR using plan primers in Lactobacillus plantarum M16, M17, M18 and M19 speices, showed the presence of plan bacteriocin in all of examined isolates (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Detection of plnEF sequences in Lactobacillus plantarum. Detection of plnEF sequences in 4 Lb. plantarum isolates. Lane M: molecular weight marker 1kb; Lane 1: M16; Lane 2: M17; Lane 3: M18; Lane 4: M19

Fig. 3

Detection of plnA sequences in Lactobacillus plantarum. Detection of plnA sequences in 4 Lb. plantarum isolates. Lane M: molecular weight marker 1kb; Lane 1: M16; Lane 2: M17; Lane 3: M18; Lane 4: M19

The PCR results of bre174A specific primers revealed that among 7 Lactobacillus brevis subspecies examined for production of bacteriocins, 5 Lactobacillus brevis strains M1, M7, M8, M10, and M12 had bre174A bacteriocin gene (Fig. 4; Table 7).
Fig. 4

Detection of bre174A sequences in Lactobacillus brevis. Detection of bre174A sequences in 7 Lb. brevis isolates. Lane M: molecular weight marker 1kb; Lane 1: M2; Lane 2: M6; Lane 3: M1; Lane 4: M7; Lane 5: M8; Lane 6: M10; Lane 7: M12

Sequence and culture deposition

Sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) and acquired accession numbers of KX572375–KX572394 (Table 4). Isolates coded M8 and M12 were selected randomly and deposited into IBRC culture collection as IBRC- M11142, IBRC- M11141 respectively.

Discussion

This study provides an overall analysis on Lactobacillus strains communities in Motal cheese. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt performed on Motal cheese to isolate and identify Lactobacillus strains communities and detect the presence of bacteriocins in the identified strains. The mean value of LAB in Motal cheese was higher in comparison with other types of traditional raw milk products such as Klila cheese (Guetouache and Guessas 2015). Lactobacilli occurrence is usually higher in ripened semi-hard cheeses. This may also due to the differences in terms of milk quality as well as to the standardization of manufacturing facilities.

LAB species have been known the most frequent species in traditional raw milk cheeses which are affecting the quality of such category of cheeses (Mennane et al. 2007; Bautista-Gallego et al. 2014).

Based on phenotypic tests, the heterofermentative Lactobacilli were detected in a high proportion in Motal cheese samples, which is in agreement with the work of (Jokovic et al. 2011) which was carried out on Radan traditional cheese.

Singh and Singh (2014) stated that although biochemical tests are commonly used in diagnosis of Lactobacillus spp., but often these tests are unable to distinguish between nearly related species in identical ecological environments, such as ripe cheese. As proof for biochemical tests, molecular approach based on PCR analysis can give reliable identification results. In this study, biphasic approach was carried out for identification and typing the Lactobacilli isolates of Motal cheese.

Several Lactobacilli including Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus curvatus and also Lactobacillus brevis species have been isolated from ripened cheddar cheese (Singh and Singh 2014). Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis representing the most predominant species in Motal cheese.

Lactobacillus brevis showed the highest population (65%) of Lactobacilli isolates in Motal cheese, as it is the case for many artisanal dairy products (Naylor and Sharpe 1958; Tzanetakis and Litopoulou-Tzanetaki 1992).

Senbagam et al. (2013) studied the Brevicin production by Lactobacillus brevis isolates from goat’s milk and their effect against 19 indicator microorganisms including Bacillus, Listeria, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Leuconostoc, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Clostridium, Pediococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. The results indicated that Staphylococcus aureus was the most sensitive to bacteriocin.

In our study, all Lactobacillus plantarum strains showed antibacterial activity against three studied indicators. Furthermore, Sankar et al. (2012) observed that Lactobacillus plantarum isolates from raw cow milk samples had a powerful antimicrobial activity against a set of indicator microorganisms.

In other studies carried out on the antimicrobial activity of LAB isolates from camel and goat’s milk, several cases of growth inhibitory were reported byLAB isolates against the food-borne pathogens (Nikolic et al. 2008; Yateem et al. 2008; Bunesova et al. 2014).

It is now well known that some LAB species produce antimicrobial substances such as hydrogen peroxide, organic acids, bacteriophages and bacteriocins as natural food preservatives (Mozzi et al. 2015). In this study, the antimicrobial activity of identified Lactobacilli isolates was carried out using agar spot and well diffusion methods. In many previous studies, it has been observed that although some strains were exhibited positive antimicrobial activity by spot on the lawn assay, their liquid medium (i.e., CFS) did not illustrate that inhibitory activity. This is probably due to the presence of colony- associated antimicrobial compounds such as the fatty acids, ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, and diacetyl which are also responsible for inhibiting growth of indicator bacteria on the lawn (Lima et al. 2007; Alegría et al. 2010; Al-Otaibi 2012).

Sharing our results, Engelhardt et al. (2015), reported that Listeria innocua NCTC 11288 was the most resistant bacterium to supernatant produced by the LAB species.

The presence of plnEF gene in all identified Lactobacillus plantarum strains was confirmed, which correspond with the results of Chaalel et al. (2015) based on the observation of the PCR product using specific primers of plnEF in Lactobacillus plantarum LbM2a.

PlnEF and plnJK are categorized as class IIb bacteriocins, whose activity depends on the overall activity of two peptides. Two peptide bacteriocins need both peptides for their activity and both peptides act synergistically. The effect of both peptides is found to be greater than the total activity calculated for the effect of each peptide, separately (Todorov 2009). These bacteriocins have little gene coding sequence similarity to other neighboring plantaricins; any peptide combination other than both synergistic peptides in these bacteriocins resulted in full loss of synergies (Zacharof and Lovitt 2012).

Two polypeptide components of Brevicin 174A include Brevicin 174A-β and 174A-γ, that inhibit the growth of closely related organisms as well as pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans and Listeria monocytogenes (Noda et al. 2015).

Noda et al. (2015) proposed that gene cluster Brevicin 174A contains two transcriptional regulator genes (breD and breG), in addition to the 5 genes necessary for biosynthesis of bacteriocin class IIb (breA, breB, breC, breE, and breH). Brevicin 174A gene is located on plasmid harbor in Lactobacillus brevis 174A, so the experimental primers were designed based on the nucleotide sequences of breC gene from Lactobacillus brevis 925A (Accession No. AB370337) (Noda et al. 2015). This gene cluster is identical with Brevicin 925A of Lactobacillus brevis 925A which was previously separated from Kimchi by Wada et al. (2009).

Results of the PCR analysis of nucleotides sequence, using specific primers plnEF and plnA in Lactobacillus plantarum isolates represent 100% homology of amplicons of plnA and plnEF primers with the structure of related bacteriocins. Moreover, amplicons of bre174A primers exhibit 99% homology to Brevicin 174A. Mills et al. (2011) also reported that Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 isolated from a type of French cheese produces a strong bacteriocin class II which has 100% homology to Plantaricin 423 and inhibits the growth of two pathogenic and non-pathogenic species of Listeria including Listeria innocua and Listeria monocytogenes.

Abbreviations

LAB: 

Lactic Acid Bacteria

GRAS: 

Generally Regarded As Safe

PCA: 

Plate Count Agar

MRS: 

de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe

VRBA: 

Violet Red Bile Agar

BP: 

Baird Parker

TBE: 

Tris/Borate/EDTA

rRNA: 

ribosomal RNA

27F: 

27 forward

1492R: 

1492 reverse

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Gel doc: 

Gel Documentation

bp: 

base pair

BLAST: 

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

BHI: 

Brain Heart Infusion

CFS: 

Cell-Free Supernatant

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

FA designed and worked on bench as well as drafted the manuscript. MBHN and MRED developed hypothesis, supervised the work on bench and helped prepare the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Hamid Ariannejad for his technical assistant.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No animal or human subjects were used in this work.

Funding

This study was funded by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Research affairs (Grant Number 3/37956).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

References

  1. Ahmed MM, Chowdhury A, Malaker R, Hossain MN, Fakruddin M, Noor R (2013) bacteriocin profiling of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. isolated from yoghurt. Int J Pharm Chem 3:50–56Google Scholar
  2. Alegría Á, Álvarez-Martín P, Sacristán N, Fernández E, Delgado S, Mayo B (2009) Diversity and evolution of the microbial populations during manufacture and ripening of Casín, a traditional Spanish, starter-free cheese made from cow’s milk. Int J Food Microbiol 136:44–51View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alegría Á, Delgado S, Roces C, López B, Mayo B (2010) Bacteriocins produced by wild Lactococcuslactis strains isolated from traditional, starter-free cheeses made of raw milk. Int J Food Microbiol 143:61–66View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Otaibi M (2012) Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from some traditional Saudi food. Am J Food Technol 7:690–699View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonsson M, Molin G, Ardö Y (2003) Lactobacillus strains isolated from Danbo cheese as adjunct cultures in a cheese model system. Int J Food Microbiol 85:159–169View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bautista-Gallego J, Alessandria V, Fontana M, Bisotti S, Taricco S, Dolci P, Cocolin L, Rantsiou K (2014) Diversity and functional characterization of Lactobacillus spp. isolated throughout the ripening of a hard cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 181:60–66View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettache G, Fatma A, Miloud H, Mebrouk K (2012) Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from Dhan, a traditional butter and their major technological traits. World Appl Sci J 17:480–488Google Scholar
  8. Bunesova V, Killer J, Vlkova E, Musilova S, Tomaska M, Rada V, Kmet V (2014) Isolation and characterization of bifidobacteria from ovine cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 188:26–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro M, Palavecino N, Herman C, Garro O, Campos C (2011) Lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal dry sausages: characterization of antibacterial compounds and study of the factors affecting bacteriocin production. Meat Sci 87:321–329View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaalel A, Riazi A, Dubois-Dauphin R, Thonart P (2015) Screening of plantaricin EF and JK in an Algerian Lactobacillus plantarum isolate. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 5:474–482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cintas L, Casaus M, Herranz C, Nes I, Hernández P (2001) Review: bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci Technol Int 7:281–305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. De Vuyst L, Leroy F (2007) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: production, purification, and food applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 13:194–199View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Emerenini E, Afolabi O, Okolie P, Akintokun A (2013) Isolation and molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fresh fruits and vegetables using nested PCR analysis. Br Microbiol Res J 3:368View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Engelhardt T, Albano H, Kiskó G, Mohácsi-Farkas C, Teixeira P (2015) Antilisterial activity of bacteriocinogenicPediococcusacidilactici HA6111-2 and Lactobacillus plantarum ESB 202 grown under pH and osmotic stress conditions. Food Microbiol 48:109–115View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghanbari M, Jami M, Kneifel W, Domig KJ (2013) Antimicrobial activity and partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by lactobacilli isolated from Sturgeon fish. Food Control 32:379–385View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guetouache M, Guessas B (2015) Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional cheese (Klila) prepared from cows milk. Afr J Microbiol Res 9:71–77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Habibi-Najafi MB, Lee BH (2007) Debittering of tryptic digests from ß-Casein and enzyme modified cheese by X-Prolyl DipeptidylPeptidase from Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei LLG. Iran. J Sci Technol 31(3):263–270Google Scholar
  18. Hayaloglu A, Guven M, Fox P (2002) Microbiological, biochemical and technological properties of Turkish White cheese ‘BeyazPeynir’. Int Dairy J 12:635–648View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jokovic N, Vukasinovic M, Veljovic K, Tolinacki M, Topisirovic L (2011) Characterization of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in traditionally produced home-made Radan cheese during ripening. Arch Biol Sci 63(1):1–10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kermanshahi RK, Peymanfar S (2012) Isolation and identification of lactobacilli from cheese, yoghurt and silage by 16S rDNA gene and study of bacteriocin and biosurfactant production. Jundishapur J Microbiol 5:528–532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Knoll C, Divol B, Du Toit M (2008) Genetic screening of lactic acid bacteria of oenological origin for bacteriocin-encoding genes. Food Microbiol 25:983–991View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leroy F, De Vuyst L (2004) Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:67–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lima ET, AndreattiFilho RL, Okamoto AS, Noujaim JC, Barros MR, Crocci AJ (2007) Evaluation in vitro of the antagonistic substances produced by Lactobacillus spp. isolated from chickens. Can J Vet Res 71:103PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahrous H, Mohamed A, El-Mongy MA, El-Batal A, Hamza H (2013) Study bacteriocin production and optimization using new isolates of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from some dairy products under different culture conditions. Food Nutr Sci 4(3):342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mennane Z, Faid M, Lagzouli M, Ouhssine M, Elyachioui M, Berny E, Ennouali M, Khedid K (2007) Physico-Chemical, Microbial and Sensory Characterisation of Moroccan Klila. Middle East J Sci Res 2:93–97Google Scholar
  26. Mills S, Serrano LM, Griffin C, O’Connor PM, Schaad G, Bruining C, Hill C, Ross RP, Meijer WC (2011) Inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 against Listeriainnocua when used as an adjunct starter in the manufacture of cheese. Microb Cell Fact 10:1–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Molloy EM, Hill C, Cotter PD, Ross RP (2011) Bacteriocins, Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. Academic press, Cambridge, pp 420–429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mozzi F, Raya RR, Vignolo GM (2015) Biotechnology of lactic acid bacteria: novel applications, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, SingaporeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Naylor J, Sharpe ME (1958) 699. Lactobacilli in Cheddar cheese: 1. The use of selective media for isolation and of serological typing for identification. J Dairy Res 25:92–103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikolic M, Terzic-Vidojevic A, Jovcic B, Begovic J, Golic N, Topisirovic L (2008) Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Bukuljac, a homemade goat’s milk cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 122:162–170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Noda M, Miyauchi R, Danshiitsoodol N, Higashikawa F, Kumagai T, Matoba Y, Sugiyama M (2015) Characterization and mutational analysis of a two-polypeptide bacteriocin produced by citrus iyo-derived Lactobacillus brevis 174A. Biol Pharm Bull 38:1902–1909View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortolani M, Moraes P, Perin L, Viçosa G, Carvalho K, Júnior AS, Nero L (2010) Molecular identification of naturally occurring bacteriocinogenic and bacteriocinogenic-like lactic acid bacteria in raw milk and soft cheese. J Dairy Sci 93:2880–2886View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Palys T, Nakamura L, Cohan FM (1997) Discovery and classification of ecological diversity in the bacterial world: the role of DNA sequence data. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 47:1145–1156Google Scholar
  34. Parada JL, Caron CR, Medeiros ABP, Soccol CR (2007) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: purification, properties and use as biopreservatives. Braz Arch BiolTechnol 50:512–542View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pyar H, Peh K (2014) Characterization and identification of Lactobacillus acidophilus using biology rapid identification system. Int J Pharm Pharmsci 6(1):189–193Google Scholar
  36. Randazzo CL, Torriani S, Akkermans AD, de Vos WM, Vaughan EE (2002) Diversity, dynamics, and activity of bacterial communities during production of an artisanal Sicilian cheese as evaluated by 16S rRNA analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1882–1892View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Remiger A, Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF (1996) Identification of bacteriocin-encoding genes in lactobacilli by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Syst Appl Microbiol 19:28–34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Sankar NR, Priyanka VD, Reddy PS, Rajanikanth P, Kumar VK, Indira M (2012) Purification and characterization of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from cow milk. Int J Microbiol Res 3:133–137Google Scholar
  39. Senbagam D, Gurusamy R, Senthilkumar B (2013) Physical chemical and biological characterization of a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus cereus NS02. Asian Pac J Trop Med 6:934–941View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Şengül M (2006) Microbiological characterization of Civil cheese, a traditional Turkish cheese: microbiological quality, isolation and identification of its indigenous Lactobacilli. World J MicrobiolBiotechnol 22:613–618View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh S, Singh R (2014) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of non-starter Lactobacillus species diversity in Indian Cheddar cheese. LWT Food Sci Technol 55:415–420View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Stackebrandt E, Goebel B (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 44:846–849View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Todorov SD (2009) Bacteriocins from Lactobacillus plantarum production, genetic organization and mode of action. Braz J Microbiol 40:209–221View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Turgay Ö, Erbilir F (2006) Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus casei from various foods. Turk J Biol 30:39–44Google Scholar
  45. Tzanetakis N, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki E (1992) Changes in numbers and kinds of lactic acid bacteria in Feta and Teleme, two Greek cheeses from ewes’ milk. J Dairy Sci 75:1389–1393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Veljovic K, Terzic-Vidojevic A, Vukasinovic M, Strahinic I, Begovic J, Lozo J, Ostojic M, Topisirovic L (2007) Preliminary characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Zlatar cheese. J Appl Microbiol 103:2142–2152View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Verma AK, Banerjee R, Dwivedi HP, Juneja VK (2014) Bacteriocins: Potential in food preservation. In: Batt CA, Tortorello ML (eds) Encyclopedia of food microbiology, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd, Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, pp 180–186Google Scholar
  48. Wada T, Noda M, Kashiwabara F, Jeon HJ, Shirakawa A, Yabu H, Matoba Y, Kumagai T, Sugiyama M (2009) Characterization of four plasmids harboured in a Lactobacillus brevis strain encoding a novel bacteriocin, brevicin 925A, and construction of a shuttle vector for lactic acid bacteria and Escherichia coli. Microbiology 155:1726–1737View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Xie Y, An H, Hao Y, Qin Q, Huang Y, Luo Y, Zhang L (2011) Characterization of an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum LB-B1 isolated from koumiss, a traditionally fermented dairy product from China. Food Control 22:1027–1031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Yateem A, Balba M, Al-Surrayai T (2008) Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Potential from Camel Milk. Int J Dairy Sci 3:194–199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Zacharof M, Lovitt R (2012) Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria a review article. APCBEE Proc 2:50–56View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Zdolec N, Filipović I (2012) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from dry fermented sausages. Vet Arh 82:265–272Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017