- Original Article
- Open Access
Metabolome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and optimization of culture medium for S-adenosyl-l-methionine production
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 14 April 2016
Accepted: 30 May 2016
Published: 9 June 2016
S-Adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) is a fine chemical used as a nutritional supplement and a prescription drug. It is industrially produced using Saccharomyces cerevisiae owing to its high SAM content. To investigate the optimization of culture medium components for higher SAM production, metabolome analysis was conducted to compare the intracellular metabolite concentrations between Kyokai no. 6 (high SAM-producing) and laboratory yeast S288C (control) under different SAM production conditions. Metabolome analysis and the result of principal component analysis showed that the rate-limiting step for SAM production was ATP supply and the levels of degradation products of adenosine nucleotides were higher in Kyokai 6 strain than in the S288C strain under the l-methionine supplemented condition. Analysis of ATP accumulation showed that the levels of intracellular ATP in the Kyokai 6 strain were also higher compared to those in the S288C strain. Furthermore, as expected from metabolome analysis, the SAM content of Kyokai 6 strain cultivated in the medium without yeast extract increased by 2.5-fold compared to that in the additional condition, by increasing intracellular ATP level with inhibited cell growth. These results suggest that high SAM production is attributed to the enhanced ATP supply with l-methionine condition and high efficiency of intracellular ATP consumption.
Another improvement strategy is an optimization of culture conditions. For example, the addition of methionine to the medium was effective for SAM production (Shiozaki et al. 1984; Shobayashi et al. 2007a). 13C-metabolic flux analysis also suggested that aeration is an important factor since enhanced ATP regeneration with high TCA cycle flux was related to high SAM production in Japanese sake brewing strains (Hayakawa et al. 2015).
In the present study, a strategy for further improvement of SAM production was investigated by comparison of the metabolite accumulation profiles of S. cerevisiae among various SAM productivity conditions. For this purpose, metabolome analysis using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS) was employed for the comprehensive analysis of intracellular metabolites including sugar phosphates, nucleotides, amino acids, and organic acids (Ohashi et al. 2008; Soga et al. 2006). Metabolome analysis using CE-TOFMS has been employed previously to characterize intracellular metabolic states in S. cerevisiae (Hasunuma et al. 2011; Nugroho et al. 2015; Oldiges et al. 2007; Shirai et al. 2013). The metabolome analysis of S. cerevisiae showed that active SAM production causes a deficiency of ATP and an accumulation of the degradation products (AMP, adenine, and adenosine). Based on this finding, the culture medium was modified to increase intracellular ATP concentration by cell growth inhibition. The SAM concentration of Kyokai no. 6 strain was increased 2.5-fold on excluding the yeast extract from the culture medium.
Materials and methods
Strains and growth conditions
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, S288C (NBRC1136) and Kyokai no. 6 (NBRC2346), were purchased from the National Biological Resource Center (NBRC, Chiba, Japan). For the preculture, the stock cells were cultivated for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking in 4 mL medium (pH 6.2) containing 50.0 g L−1 d-glucose, 10.0 g L−1 peptone (Nihon pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), 5.0 g L−1 yeast extract (Bacto Yeast Extract, Difco Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), 4.0 g L−1 KH2PO4, 2.0 g L−1 K2HPO4, 0.6 g L−1 MgSO4·7H2O. For SAM production assay, 1 % of preculture broth was inoculated in 4 mL SAM production medium, which contained the components described as above with or without 1.5 g L−1 l-methionine (Hayakawa et al. 2015). All cultivations were performed for 24 h at 30 °C in triplicate.
The analysis of SAM, CDW, glucose, and ethanol were performed as described by Hayakawa et al. (2015). SAM concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography LC2010A-HT (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after 10 % HClO4 extraction. CDW was estimated using 1 OD600 corresponding to 0.21 g CDW L−1 in Kyokai 6 and 0.22 g CDW L−1 in S288C. Glucose and ethanol concentrations were measured enzymatically by using an analyzer (BF-7, Oji Scientific Instruments, Hyogo, Japan). The intracellular ATP concentration was measured as follows. Cultivated cells were harvested by filtration and washed with Milli-Q water twice. The membrane was frozen using liquid N2, and lyophilized. Dried cells were suspended in 1 mL Milli-Q water and boiled for 10 min at 95 °C. The suspension was centrifuged to collect the supernatant (Ando et al. 2006). The ATP contents in the supernatant were measured using Fluorometric and Colorimetric ATP Quantitation Kit (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) and a spectrometer.
Intracellular metabolite concentrations were measured using CE-TOFMS, according to previously described methods (Nugroho et al. 2015; Yoshikawa et al. 2013). Cultivated cells were harvested by filtration and washed with Milli-Q water. After the membrane was soaked in methanol solution containing an internal standard (H3304-1002, Human Metabolome Technologies, Yamagata, Japan), ultra-sonication was performed. After removal of the membrane, chloroform and water were added to the solution. The aqueous portion collected after mixing with a vortex mixer was filtered by UltrafreeMC-PLHCC 250 (Human Metabolome Technologies) and dried. For CE-TOFMS, pellets were suspended in the second internal standard (H3304-1004, Human Metabolome Technologies) solution. Samples were analyzed using Agilent 7100 CE system with Agilent 6224 TOF–MS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Metabolome data were normalized and analyzed by PCA using Mass Profiler Professional (Agilent Technologies).
Effect of cultivation condition on SAM production levels
Fermentation profiles of high-SAM-producing (Kyokai 6) and laboratory (S288C) strains in the presence of glucose with or without l-methionine
SAM production (mg L−1)
7.5 ± 0.4
177.6 ± 4.0
6.3 ± 0.1
62.6 ± 0.9
Biomass (g CDW L−1)
6.7 ± 0.04
5.6 ± 0.06
5.5 ± 0.05
5.0 ± 0.05
SAM content (mg g CDW−1)
1.1 ± 0.01
31.8 ± 1.0
1.1 ± 0.01
12.5 ± 0.2
Ethanol (g L−1)
17.8 ± 0.5
20.0 ± 0.1
19.5 ± 0.2
20.7 ± 0.1
5.7 ± 0.02
5.3 ± 0.05
6.0 ± 0.03
5.4 ± 0.03
Comparison of the fermentation profile (Table 1) showed that the SAM content in Kyokai 6 strains cultured with l-methionine (31.8 mg g CDW−1) was 28-fold higher than that in strains cultivated without l-methionine (1.1 mg g CDW−1). The ethanol titer was also increased while the cell growth and the pH were decreased by methionine addition. The SAM content in the Kyokai 6 strain with methionine supplementation was 2.5-fold higher than that in the S288C strain (12.5 mg g CDW−1). These results suggested that an addition of methionine in the medium changed the intracellular metabolism to enhance ethanol and SAM production.
Effects of l-methionine addition on intracellular metabolite profile
The effects of methionine addition on the S. cerevisiae metabolome were investigated by a comparison between Kyokai 6 (white, without methionine addition) and Kyokai 6 Met(+) (black, with methionine addition) data, which is shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The metabolome data indicated that only a trace amount of methionine was observed in the Kyokai 6 strain without methionine addition (white, 0.06 μmol g CDW−1, Fig. 2). Since a relatively large amount of ATP was accumulated in the condition (13.6 μmol g CDW−1, Fig. 1), these results indicated that the l-methionine supply is a bottleneck in SAM biosynthesis.
The methionine depletion was solved in the Kyokai 6 Met(+), since the intracellular methionine concentration was increased more than 400× by the supplementation of 1.5 g L−1 l-methionine in the medium (28.2 μmol g CDW−1, Fig. 2). In addition to the improvement of SAM production (Table 1), the metabolome data also revealed that the metabolic profile of the Kyokai 6 strain was drastically changed by methionine supplementation. For instance, while the succinate level was significantly increased, most intermediates in the glycolysis pathway, PP pathway, and TCA cycle were clearly decreased in Kyokai 6 Met(+) samples (black in Fig. 2) by methionine addition. These results suggested that the functions of the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation were somehow inhibited by the excess methionine, being compensated by an activation of substrate-level phosphorylation with ethanol production (Table 1). This was supported by the intracellular concentrations of the nucleoside triphosphates including ATP and GTP (Figs. 1, 2). The metabolome data showed that intracellular ATP was depleted under the l-methionine supplemented condition (0.02 μmol g CDW−1, black in Fig. 1). Since the AMP level was increased, the adenylate energy charge (EC = ([ATP] + 0.5 × [ADP])/([ATP] + [ADP] + [AMP])) was decreased in Kyokai 6 Met(+) samples, indicating that the abilities for the anabolic and maintenance reactions were hampered by the methionine addition (Guimaraes and Londesborough 2008). These results suggested that ATP supply should be a rate-limiting step for SAM production in the methionine-supplemented condition (Fig. 1).
Comparison between laboratory and SAM production strains
The SAM content in the Kyokai 6 strain was higher than that in the S288C strain with and without methionine supplementation (Table 1). The 13C-metabolic flux analysis performed in our previous study showed that active SAM biosynthesis in the Kyokai 6 strain should be derived from enhanced ATP regeneration with high TCA cycle flux (Hayakawa et al. 2015). It was also known that S. cerevisiae strains used for Japanese sake brewing showed high respiration activity and generally overexpress genes involved in the TCA cycle, respiration, and oxidative phosphorylation (Kasahara 1963; Shobayashi et al. 2007b). For further investigation of the effects of ATP levels on SAM productivity, intracellular ATP concentrations were determined by colorimetric analysis. The ATP level in Kyokai 6 strain (4.5 ± 0.4 μmol g CDW−1) was threefold higher than that in S288C strain (1.5 ± 0.06 μmol g CDW−1) without methionine supplementation. This result confirmed that Kyokai 6 strain has the potential for high SAM productivity due to high intracellular ATP level.
However, as mentioned above, the intracellular ATP was depleted in Kyokai 6 strain under the l-methionine supplemented condition (Fig. 1). It may indicate that the high ATP content could not contribute to the enhanced SAM production in Kyokai 6 strain. In order to address the problem, the metabolome data was additionally obtained from the laboratory yeast strain (S288C) cultivated with l-methionine (S288C Met(+) in Figs. 1, 2). The comparison between Kyokai 6 Met(+) (black) and S288C Met(+) (gray) data indicated that the metabolic profiles in the two conditions looked similar each other. To identify metabolites whose concentrations were changed in relation to SAM production, the principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using all data obtained from the three conditions.
Effect of intracellular ATP concentration on SAM production
The metabolome analysis showed that the intracellular ATP was depleted in the methionine-supplemented condition, and suggested that the SAM production could be improved by the elevation of ATP supply. Since the supplementation of expensive materials such as ATP and the application of gene manipulation technologies are unpreferable for food production, a fermentation engineering technique was applied in this study by the optimization of culture medium composition.
In order to increase ATP pool size, the culture medium composition was optimized in this study because gene manipulation technologies are not preferable for industrial food production. The restriction of cell growth, and increased intracellular ATP concentration and SAM production were achieved by reducing the supplemented yeast extract (Fig. 5c). The SAM concentration (86.1 mg g CDW−1) was larger than that reported previously (70 mg g CDW−1) (Shobayashi et al. 2006). On the other hand, the production of 10.8 g L−1 SAM was achieved by the cultivation of yeast for 5 days in a 10-L fermenter (Shiozaki et al. 1986) indicating that the volumetric productivity of SAM could be increased by improvement in intracellular SAM concentration and biomass levels. Thus, further improvements is required in the fermentation process such as introducing a two-phase process including a cell growth with rich medium and inhibited cell growth with restricted yeast extract. These results demonstrated that the metabolome analysis could offer useful information for productivity improvement in fermentation engineering. Furthermore, the reduction of the yeast extract is a cost-effective strategy for producing SAM and should be utilized to improve the production of other useful fine chemicals.
The results of this study uncovered that SAM content was increased by cell growth inhibition via an elevation of intracellular ATP level, whereas it has been reported that cell growth inhibition by lower agitation speed and feeding ethanol was effective to improve SAM content in S. cerevisiae (Shiozaki et al. 1989). The results suggested that the improved ATP supply enhanced the tolerance of S. cerevisiae against the lower pH conditions for uncontrolled pH cultivations and indirectly contributed to active SAM biosynthesis. This is because metabolite production was inhibited under the acid stress condition in S. cerevisiae (Sakihama et al. 2015), and intracellular ATP accumulation was related to acid stress tolerance of S. cerevisiae (Nugroho et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2011). The strategy developed in this study would be useful to improve other bio-based productions involved in ATP supply such as glutathione and succinate (Hara and Kondo 2015). A novel methodology for more efficient SAM production would be addressed by further investigation of the metabolism and its relationship with the physiology of S. cerevisiae.
We thank Dr. Katsunori Yoshikawa, Dr. Takashi Hirasawa, Mr. Tatsuya Itoga and Mrs. Yuki Hidaka for their support in performing CE-TOFMS analysis, and Dr. Kenji Inoue, Dr. Yoshifumi Fukui and Mr. Makoto Ueda for their helpful suggestions.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Ando A, Tanaka F, Murata Y, Takagi H, Shima J. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to high-sucrose stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:249–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Wang Z, Wang Z, Dou J, Zhou C. Improving methionine and ATP availability by MET6 and SAM2 co-expression combined with sodium citrate feeding enhanced SAM accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(4):56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Lou S, Fan L, Zhang X, Tan T. Control of ATP concentration in Escherichia coli using synthetic small regulatory RNAs for enhanced S-adenosylmethionine production. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnv115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guimaraes PM, Londesborough J. The adenylate energy charge and specific fermentation rate of brewer’s yeasts fermenting high- and very high-gravity worts. Yeast. 2008;25:47–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara KY, Kondo A. ATP regulation in bioproduction. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:198.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hasunuma T, Sanda T, Yamada R, Yoshimura K, Ishii J, Kondo A. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hayakawa K, Kajihata S, Matsuda F, Shimizu H. (13)C-metabolic flux analysis in S-adenosyl-l-methionine production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;120:532–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang M, Chen K, Liu Z, Wei P, Ying H, Chang H. Succinic acid production by Actinobacillus succinogenes using spent brewer’s yeast hydrolysate as a nitrogen source. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160:244–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanai M, Masuda M, Takaoka Y, Ikeda H, Masaki K, Fujii T, Iefuji H. Adenosine kinase-deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae accumulates S-adenosylmethionine because of an enhanced methionine biosynthesis pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:1183–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kasahara H. Kyokai yeast. J Brew Soc Jpn. 1963;58:583–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Meng X, Diao E, Du F, Zhao X. Productivity enhancement of S-adenosylmethionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using n-hexadecane as oxygen vector. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2012;87:1379–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mosser M, Kapel R, Chevalot I, Olmos E, Marc I, Marc A, Oriol E. Fractionation of yeast extract by nanofiltration process to assess key compounds involved in CHO cell culture improvement. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31:875–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nugroho RH, Yoshikawa K, Shimizu H. Metabolomic analysis of acid stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;120:396–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohashi Y, Hirayama A, Ishikawa T, Nakamura S, Shimizu K, Ueno Y, Tomita M, Soga T. Depiction of metabolome changes in histidine-starved Escherichia coli by CE-TOFMS. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4:135–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oldiges M, Lutz S, Pflug S, Schroer K, Stein N, Wiendahl C. Metabolomics: current state and evolving methodologies and tools. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:495–511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakihama Y, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Improved ethanol production from xylose in the presence of acetic acid by the overexpression of the HAA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;119:297–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiomi N, Fukuda H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A. Production of S-adenosyl-l-methionine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells carrying a gene for ethionine resistance. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;35:1120–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiozaki S, Shimizu S, Yamada H. Unusual intracellular accumulation of S-Adenosyl-l-methionine by microorganisms. Agric Biol Chem. 1984;48:2293–300.Google Scholar
- Shiozaki S, Shimizu S, Yamada H. Production of S-adenosyl-l-methione by Saccharomyces sake. J Biotechnol. 1986;4(6):345–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shiozaki S, Shimizu S, Yamada H. S-Adenosyl-l-methionine production by Saccharomyces sake: optimization of the culture conditions for the production of cells with a high S-Adenosyl-l-methionine content. Agr Biol Chem. 1989;53:3269–74.Google Scholar
- Shirai T, Matsuda F, Okamoto M, Kondo A. Evaluation of control mechanisms for Saccharomyces cerevisiae central metabolic reactions using metabolome data of eight single-gene deletion mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:3569–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shobayashi M, Fujii T, Iefuji H. Effects of accumulated S-adenosylmethionine on growth of yeast cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007a;71:1595–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shobayashi M, Mukai N, Iwashita K, Hiraga Y, Iefuji H. A new method for isolation of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-accumulating yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;69:704–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shobayashi M, Ukena E, Fujii T, Iefuji H. Genome-wide expression profile of sake brewing yeast under shaking and static conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007b;71:323–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soga T, Baran R, Suematsu M, Ueno Y, Ikeda S, Sakurakawa T, Kakazu Y, Ishikawa T, Robert M, Nishioka T, Tomita M. Differential metabolomics reveals ophthalmic acid as an oxidative stress biomarker indicating hepatic glutathione consumption. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16768–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM. Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1616–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Wang D, Wei G, Wang C. Improved co-production of S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione using citrate as an auxiliary energy substrate. Bioresour Technol. 2013;131:28–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa T, Ogawa K, Hidaka Y, Nakajima T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of the central metabolism of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 under different trophic conditions. Biotechnol J. 2013;8:571–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou J, Liu L, Chen JJ. Improved ATP supply enhances acid tolerance of Candida glabrata during pyruvic acid production. Appl Microbiol. 2011;110:44–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar