- Original article
- Open Access
Characterization of the Kluyveromyces marxianus strain DMB1 YGL157w gene product as a broad specificity NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase
© Akita et al.; licensee Springer. 2015
- Received: 24 December 2014
- Accepted: 17 February 2015
- Published: 3 March 2015
The open reading frame YGL157w in the genome of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus strain DMB1 encodes a putative uncharacterized oxidoreductase. However, this protein shows 46% identity with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c NADPH-dependent methylglyoxal reductase, which exhibits broad substrate specificity for aldehydes. In the present study, the YGL157w gene product (KmGRE2) was purified to homogeneity from overexpressing Escherichia coli cells and found to be a monomer. The enzyme was strictly specific for NADPH and was active with a wide variety of substrates, including aliphatic (branched-chain and linear) and aromatic aldehydes. The optimal pH for methylglyoxal reduction was 5.5. With methylglyoxal as a substrate, the optimal temperature for enzyme activity at pH 5.5 was 45°C. The enzyme retained more than 70% of its activity after incubation for 30 min at temperatures below 35°C or at pHs between 5.5 and 9.0. In addition, the KmGRE2-overexpressing E. coli showed improved growth when cultivated in cedar hydrolysate, as compared to cells not expressing the enzyme. Taken together, these results indicate that KmGRE2 is potentially useful as an inhibit decomposer in E. coli cells.
- Aldehyde inhibitor
- Kluyveromyces marxianus
- Lignocellulosic biomass
The NADPH-dependent methylglyoxal reductase (EC 188.8.131.523) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is termed GRE2. Using NADPH as a coenzyme, GRE2 catalyzes the stereoselective reduction of a broad range of substrates, including aldehydes and diketones, as well as aliphatic and aromatic ketones (Chen et al. 2003; Murata et al. 1985). In S. cerevisiae, this enzyme functions within the high osmolarity glycerol pathway (Garay-Arroyo and Covarrubias 1999), and its expression is induced by environmental conditions, including ionic, osmotic, oxidative, heat shock and heavy metal-related stresses (Garay-Arroyo and Covarrubias 1999; Krantz et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2008; Rep et al. 2001; Rutherford and Bird 2004). GRE2 also shows isovaleraldehyde reductase activity and so acts as a suppressor of filamentation (Chen et al. 2003; Hauser et al. 2007). To date, GRE2 and homologues have been purified to homogeneity from S. cerevisiae (Chen et al. 2003; Murata et al. 1985), Aspergillus niger (Inoue et al. 1988) and goat liver (Ray and Ray 1984), and their enzymatic properties have been characterized. In addition, the three-dimensional structures of the S. cerevisiae S288c GRE2 apo enzyme and the enzyme-NADP+ complex expressed in Escherichia coli have been solved (Guo et al. 2014). Based on its structural features, GRE2 is classified as a member of the extended short-chain-dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily (Müller et al. 2010).
S. cerevisiae GRE2 is currently being used as a versatile biocatalyst for the stereoselective synthesis of hydroxy compounds, which serve as building blocks in the production of pharmaceuticals and other fine chemicals (Choi et al. 2010; Ema et al. 2008; Müller et al. 2010; Park et al. 2010). Another advantageous feature of GRE2 is a decomposer in bacteria. For example, GRE2 is used for glycolaldehyde degradation during bioethanol production in S. cerevisiae (Jayakody et al. 2013). In addition, a S. cerevisiae strain overexpressing a GRE2 with site-directed mutagenesis exhibited enhanced furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) detoxification (Moon and Liu 2012). Conversely, in a S. cerevisiae GRE2 knockout strain growth was suppressed by environmental stress (Warringer and Blomberg 2006), and filament formation was increased in the presence of isoamyl alcohol (Hauser et al. 2007). Hence, GRE2 is regarded as a key enzyme necessary for inhibitor and stress tolerance in S. cerevisiae.
Construction of expression vectors
The plasmid pET-16b/YGL157w was constructed for production of K. marxianus YGL157w protein with a N-terminal hexahistidine tag. After preparation of genomic DNA from K. marxianus strain DMB1 (strain number: HUT7412), the YGL157w gene (accession number: LC016711) was amplified using PCR with KOD -plus- DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and the primers 5′-CAT ATGACGTACGTTGTGGTTACTGGTGC-3′ (the NdeI site is in bold and the initiation codon is in italics) and 5′-GGATCC TTAGTTGTTAGCCTTTAGTATTTG-3′ (the BamHI site is in bold and termination codon is in italics). The PCR product was cloned into pTA2 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and sequenced to check for PCR errors. The YGL157w gene was then excised from the resulting plasmid using NdeI and BamHI and subcloned into pET-16b (Novagen, Hessen, Germany) to give pET-16b/YGL157w.
Expression of proteins
YGL157w protein was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring pET-16b/YGL157w and then purified to homogeneity. The cells were grown at 37°C for 3 h in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (1 L) containing 100 mg/L ampicillin. After inducing expression by addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1.0 mM, the culture was incubated for an additional 3 h. The cells were then harvested, suspended in 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.9) containing 500 mM NaCl (buffer A) and 5 mM imidazole, and disrupted by ultrasonication. The resultant lysate was clarified by centrifugation (27,500 × g for 15 min at 4°C), after which the supernatant was applied to a Chelating Sepharose Fast Flow column (20 mL; GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) charged with Ni2+ and equilibrated with buffer A containing 5 mM imidazole. After washing the column with buffer A containing 5 mM imidazole (40 mL) and then 60 mM imidazole (60 mL), the recombinant YGL157w protein was eluted with buffer A containing 500 mM imidazole. The active fractions were pooled, concentrated using a Vivaspin 20 concentrator (10,000 MWCO, Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) and loaded onto a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 pg column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 50 mM NaCl. The active fractions were pooled and dialyzed against 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.2). Finally, the dialysate was concentrated and the resultant solution was used for biochemical experiments.
Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin (BSA) serving as the standard (Bradford 1976).
Molecular mass determination
SDS-PAGE was carried out on a 10% polyacrylamide gel using the method of Laemmli (1970). EzStandard PrestainBlue (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) was used as the molecular mass standards. The protein sample was boiled for 5 min in EzApply (ATTO). Protein bands were visualized by staining with EzStainAqua (ATTO).
The molecular mass of the native enzyme was determined by gel filtration column chromatography using a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column. Conalbumin (75 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa) and aprotinin (6.5 kDa) served as molecular standards (GE Healthcare).
Assay of enzyme activity
KmGRE2 activity was measured by monitoring the decreases in the absorbance at 340 nm caused by the reduction of aldehyde, or the increases in the absorbance caused by the oxidation of alcohol. The mixture (1 mL) used for the reductive reaction contained 100 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5), 5 mM aldehyde, 0.2 mM NADPH and YGL157w protein. The mixture (1 mL) used for the oxidative reaction contained 100 mM bicarbonate-NaOH (pH 10.0), 5 mM alcohol, 1.25 mM NADP+ and YGL157w protein. The reaction was started by the addition of coenzymes, and the absorbance at 340 nm was monitored at 25°C using a Shimadzu UV-2450 (Kyoto, Japan). The extinction coefficient of NADPH was 6.22 mM−1 cm−1. One unit of enzyme was defined as the amount of enzyme producing 1 μmol of NADPH per min at 25°C in the reductive reaction of methylglyoxal.
Effects of pH and temperature on enzyme activity
The pH dependence of the reduction catalyzed by YGL157w protein was determined at 25°C using 100 mM concentrations of acetate (pH 4.0–5.5) and citrate (pH 5.5–6.5). The temperature dependence was evaluated by measuring the reductive reaction at temperatures ranging from 25 to 45°C.
Effects of pH and temperature on enzyme stability
The effect of pH on enzyme stability was evaluated by incubating 100 nM YGL157w protein for 30 min at 35°C with 50 mM concentrations of acetate (pH 5.0–5.5), citrate (pH 5.5–6.5), phosphate (pH 6.5–8.0), borate-NaOH (pH 8.0–9.0) and bicarbonate-NaOH (pH 9.0–11.0). The enzyme solution was then rapidly cooled on ice, and the remaining activity was determined using the standard reduction assay. The thermal stability was determined by incubating YGL157w protein in 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.2) for 30 min at temperatures ranging from 25–45°C. The enzyme solution was then rapidly cooled on ice, and the remaining activity was determined using the standard reduction assay.
Determination of kinetic parameters
The initial velocity of the reductive reaction was analyzed using the standard assay conditions. To determine the kinetic constants for methylglyoxal and NADPH, several concentrations of methylglyoxal (0.05–15 mM) or NADPH (0.01–0.15 mM) were used. The initial velocity was then plotted against the substrate concentration, and the K m and k cat values were determined by curve fitting using Igor Pro ver. 3.14 (WaveMetrics, Tigard, OR, USA).
Preparation of hydrolysate
Lignocellulosic biomass material (Japanese cedar) was milled using a cutter mill (MKCM-3; Masuko Sangyo, Saitama, Japan), after which the resulting particles were used as the initial raw material. According to Lee et al. (2010), mechanochemical and hydrothermal pretreatment was carried out. The resulting sample was hydrolyzed using 20 FPU/g of Acremonium cellulase (Meiji Seika Pharma, Nagoya, Japan) and 40 μL/g of Optimash BG (Genencor International, Rochester, NY, USA) in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 5.0) at 50°C and 150 rpm. After incubation for 48 h, the reaction mixture was harvested by centrifugation, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The pH of the mixture was then adjusted to 6.5, the mixture was diluted, and the resulting solution was used as the hydrolysate. Further details of the procedure are provided elsewhere (Akita et al. 2015).
Effect of KmGRE2 expression on cell growth
The effect of KmGRE2 expression was evaluated by cultivation in a test tube using 3 mL of hydrolysate containing 0.5 mM IPTG, which was incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm. E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring pET-16b/YGL157w or pET-16b were pregrown overnight and then diluted 1:100 with fresh hydrolysate. Cultures were monitored for cell growth at OD600 using an Eppendorf BioSpectrometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
Quantification of sugars and aldehydes
After clarifying the culture by centrifugation and filtration, the supernatant was subjected to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Quantification was performed using an Aminex HPX-87H cationic exchange column connected to an Aminex 85H Micro-Guard Column (Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, CA, USA). The chromatographic conditions for sugars and aldehydes were as follows: mobile phase, 4.5 mM H2SO4 or 8 mM H2SO4; flow rate, 0.6 mL · min−1; and the column oven temperature, 65°C or 35°C. Sugars and aldehydes were detected using a Jasco RI-2031 Plus Intelligent Refractive Index Detector (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) or a Jasco UV-2070 Plus Intelligent UV/VIS Detector at 278 nm (Jasco).
Purification and molecular mass determination of KmGRE2
Purification of KmGRE2 from E. coli BL21 (DE3)
Total protein (mg)
Total activity (U)
Specific activity (U/mg)
Chelating sepharose fast flow column
HiLoad 26/60 superdex 200 pg column
The apparent molecular mass of the YGL157w protein was determined to be about 36 kDa using Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column gel filtration chromatography (Figure 2B). SDS-PAGE of the enzyme showed one major band of 40 kDa (Figure 2A), suggesting the native protein exists as a monomer.
Substrate specificity and kinetic properties of KmGRE2
Relative activity (%) a
244 ± 1.9
95.6 ± 1.6
81.4 ± 1.4
80.8 ± 2.5
60.1 ± 1.7
49.3 ± 0.7
22.3 ± 1.5
14.3 ± 2.0
After measuring the initial rates at various methylglyoxal or NADPH concentrations, regression analyses were used to fit the data to the Michaelis-Menten equation (data not shown). The K m and k cat values for methylglyoxal were calculated as 0.30 ± 0.018 mM and 1.3 × 103 ± 15 min−1, respectively. The kinetic parameters for NADPH were 0.028 ± 0.0012 mM and 1.4 × 103 ± 22 min−1 mM−1, respectively. In addition, the k cat/K m for methylglyoxal and NADPH were 4.4 × 103 and 5.1 × 104 min−1 mM−1, respectively. These results are similar to those of S. cerevisiae (Murata et al. 1985).
Effects of pH and temperature on enzyme activity and stability
Cell growth in hydrolysate from cedar
Sugar and aldehyde components in cedar hydrolysate
262.5 ± 4.4
183.4 ± 3.4
20.5 ± 2.0
16.8 ± 0.6
264.3 ± 1.9
184.4 ± 4.7
23.1 ± 0.2
15.9 ± 0.2
In the present study, we succeeded in expressing the YGL157w gene from K. marxianus strain DMB1 in E. coli cells and purifying the product. Characterization of the purified enzyme showed that KmGRE2 harbored strong NADPH-dependent reductive activities toward at least 10 aldehyde substrates (Tables 2). The higher activities were observed on C3 branched-chain and C3 to C7 linear aldehydes, whereas lower or no activities were detected for C8 linear aldehyde and C6 to C8 aromatic aldehydes. Conversely, S. cerevisiae GRE2 showed the highest activity for phenyglyoxal (C8) in the presence of NADPH (Murata et al. 1985). When we compared the amino acid sequences of KmGRE2 and S. cerevisiae S288c GRE2, we found that Ser127, Tyr165 and Lys169 in GRE2 were completely conserved in KmGRE2 as Ser127, Tyr165 and Lys169 (Figure 1). The three aforementioned residues in GRE2 are considered the crucial roles for the substrate dehydrogenation: Ser127 stabilizes the substrate, Tyr165 acts on a catalytic base and Lys169 facilitates the catalysis at neutral pH (Guo et al. 2014). However, two residues responsible for the substrate binding differ between the two enzymes: Phe85 and Tyr128 in GRE2 are respectively replaced by Cys85 and Val128 in KmGRE2 (Guo et al. 2014) (Figure 1). These substitutions may reduce the hydrophobic interactions for aromatic aldehydes in KmGRE2, which suggests that the molecular mechanism for substrate recognition differs between KmGRE2 and GRE2. To assess the molecular mechanism, we are now trying to obtain crystals of cofactor and/or substrate-bound KmGRE2.
The utilization of biofuel from lignocellulosic biomass holds promise as a means of abating global warming. This has prompted the development of a number of bioconversion methods for biofuel production (Akita et al. 2015; Lan and Liao 2013; Nakashima et al. 2014; da Silva et al. 2014). But while those methods produced several kinds of biofuels from hydrolysate derived of lignocellulosic biomass, the productivities and yields were often low (Akita et al. 2015; Lan and Liao 2013; Nakashima et al. 2014; da Silva et al. 2014). One of the mentioned causes of the low productivity is microbial growth inhibition by aldehyde inhibitors (Mills et al. 2009). Because aldehyde inhibitors such as furfural, HMF, glycolaldehyde, methylglyoxal and vanillin are generated mainly during the biomass hybridization process (Jarboe and Chi 2013; Jayakody et al. 2011), they are able to inhibit microbial growth and interfere with subsequent fermentation (Jayakody et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2008; Mills et al. 2009; Moon and Liu 2012). Consequently, we proposed that KmGRE2 utilizes as inhibitor decomposer. To confirm the ability of KmGRE2 to play decomposer, we assessed the effect of KmGRE2 expression on cell growth in cedar hydrolysate, production of which led to the formation of both furfural and HMF. As anticipated, the KmGRE2-overexpressing E. coli showed substantial growth improvement (Figure 4). We think that the growth improvement was achieved by enhanced furfural degradation, which provided for the preferable culture conditions at early culture phase. In fact, the OD600 of KmGRE2-overexpressing E. coli at 6 to 12 h were 1.3–1.6-fold higher than these of not expressing E. coli. On the other hand, the less activity toward HMF in KmGRE2-overexpressing E. coli remained unclear. The omics analysis on the metabolic response of KmGRE2-overexpressing E. coli may reveal this phenomenon. Recently, we developed a simple and efficient method involving biomass-inducible chromosome-based expression system (BICES) for expressing foreign genes without the use of plasmids or expensive inducers (Akita et al. 2015; Nakashima et al. 2014). This method can also be used to produce biofuels, but the productivity and yield were markedly diminished when hydrolysate from Japanese cedar as the carbon source for isobutanol production (Akita et al. 2015). We are now planning to integrate KmGRE2 gene into the genome of the E. coli strain involving BICES. We anticipate that this will improve growth rates, thereby increasing the productivity and yield.
We are grateful to all members of the Bio-conversion Research Team at our Institute [Biomass Refinery Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Sciences and Technology (AIST)] for their technical assistance and valuable discussion.
- Akita H, Nakashima N, Hoshino T (2015) Bacterial production of isobutanol without expensive reagents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:991–999View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CN, Porubleva L, Shearer G, Svrakic M, Holden LG, Dover JL, Johnston M, Chitnis PR, Kohl DH (2003) Associating protein activities with their genes: rapid identification of a gene encoding a methylglyoxal reductase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20:545–554View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi YH, Choi HJ, Kim D, Uhm KN, Kim HK (2010) Asymmetric synthesis of (S)-3-chloro-1-phenyl-1-propanol using Saccharomyces cerevisiae reductase with high enantioselectivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:185–193View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- da Silva TL, Gouveia L, Reis A (2014) Integrated microbial processes for biofuels and high value-added products: the way to improve the cost effectiveness of biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1043–1053View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ema T, Ide S, Okita N, Sakai T (2008) Highly efficient chemoenzymatic synthesis of methyl (R)-o-chloromandelate, a key intermediate for clopidogrel, via asymmetric reduction with recombinant Escherichia coli. Adv Synth Catal 350:2039–2044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA (1999) Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 22:879–892View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo PC, Bao ZZ, Ma XX, Xia Q, Li WF (2014) Structural insights into the cofactor-assisted substrate recognition of yeast methylglyoxal/isovaleraldehyde reductase Gre2. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844:1486–1492View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hauser M, Horn P, Tournu H, Hauser NC, Hoheisel JD, Brown AJ, Dickinson JR (2007) A transcriptome analysis of isoamyl alcohol-induced filamentation in yeast reveals a novel role for Gre2p as isovaleraldehyde reductase. FEMS Yeast Res 7:84–92View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue Y, Rhee H, Watanabe K, Murata K, Kimura A (1988) Metabolism of 2-oxoaldehyde in mold. Purification and characterization of two methylglyoxal reductases from Aspergillus niger. Eur J Biochem 171:213–218View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarboe LR, Chi Z (2013) Inhibition of microbial biocatalysts by biomass-derived aldehydes and methods for engineering tolerance. In: Torrioni L, Pescasseroli E (eds) New Developments in Aldehydes Research. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jayakody LN, Hayashi N, Kitagaki H (2011) Identification of glycolaldehyde as the key inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation by yeast and genome-wide analysis of its toxicity. Biotechnol Lett 33:285–292View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jayakody LN, Horie K, Hayashi N, Kitagaki H (2013) Engineering redox cofactor utilization for detoxification of glycolaldehyde, a key inhibitor of bioethanol production, in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:6589–6600View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krantz M, Nordlander B, Valadi H, Johansson M, Gustafsson L, Hohmann S (2004) Anaerobicity prepares Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for faster adaptation to osmotic shock. Eukaryot Cell 3:1381–1390View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lan EI, Liao JC (2013) Microbial synthesis of n-butanol, isobutanol, and other higher alcohols from diverse resources. Bioresour Technol 135:339–349View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SH, Chang F, Inoue S, Endo T (2010) Increase in enzyme accessibility by generation of nanospace in cell wall supramolecular structure. Bioresour Technol 101:7218–7223View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu ZL, Moon J, Andersh BJ, Slininger PJ, Weber S (2008) Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:743–753View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mills TY, Sandoval NR, Gill RT (2009) Cellulosic hydrolysate toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Biofuels 2:26View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moon J, Liu ZL (2012) Engineered NADH-dependent GRE2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by directed enzyme evolution enhances HMF reduction using additional cofactor NADPH. Enzyme Microb Technol 50:115–120View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller M, Katzberg M, Bertau M, Hummel W (2010) Highly efficient and stereoselective biosynthesis of (2S,5S)-hexanediol with a dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Org Biomol Chem 8:1540–1550View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murata K, Fukuda Y, Simosaka M, Watanabe K, Saikusa T, Kimura A (1985) Metabolism of 2-oxoaldehyde in yeasts. Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent methylglyoxal-reducing enzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem 151:631–636View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima N, Akita H, Hoshino T (2014) Establishment of a novel gene expression method, BICES (biomass-inducible chromosome-based expression system), and its application for production of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin. Metab Eng 25:204–214View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park HJ, Jung J, Choi H, Uhm KN, Kim HK (2010) Enantioselective bioconversion using Escherichia coli cells expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae reductase and Bacillus subtilis glucose dehydrogenase. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:1300–1306View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ray M, Ray S (1984) Purification and partial characterization of a methylglyoxal reductase from goat liver. Biochim Biophys Acta 802:119–127View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rep M, Proft M, Remize F, Tamás M, Serrano R, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (2001) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sko1p transcription factor mediates HOG pathway-dependent osmotic regulation of a set of genes encoding enzymes implicated in protection from oxidative damage. Mol Microbiol 40:1067–1083View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rutherford JC, Bird AJ (2004) Metal-responsive transcription factors that regulate iron, zinc, and copper homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. Eukaryot Cell 3:1–13View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki T, Hoshino T, Matsushika A (2014) Draft genome sequence of Kluyveromyces marxianus strain DMB1, isolated from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate. Genome Announc 2:e00733-14View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warringer J, Blomberg A (2006) Involvement of yeast YOL151W/GRE2 in ergosterol metabolism. Yeast 23:389–398View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.