- Original article
- Open Access
Influence of oxygen on NADH recycling and oxidative stress resistance systems in Lactobacillus panis PM1
© Kang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 23 January 2013
- Accepted: 24 January 2013
- Published: 31 January 2013
Lactobacillus panis strain PM1 is an obligatory heterofermentative and aerotolerant microorganism that also produces 1,3-propanediol from glycerol. This study investigated the metabolic responses of L. panis PM1 to oxidative stress under aerobic conditions. Growth under aerobic culture triggered an early entrance of L. panis PM1 into the stationary phase along with marked changes in end-product profiles. A ten-fold higher concentration of hydrogen peroxide was accumulated during aerobic culture compared to microaerobic culture. This H2O2 level was sufficient for the complete inhibition of L. panis PM1 cell growth, along with a significant reduction in end-products typically found during anaerobic growth. In silico analysis revealed that L. panis possessed two genes for NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase, but their expression levels were not significantly affected by the presence of oxygen. Specific activities for these two enzymes were observed in crude extracts from L. panis PM1. Enzyme assays demonstrated that the majority of the H2O2 in the culture media was the product of NADH: H2O2 oxidase which was constitutively-active under both aerobic and microaerobic conditions; whereas, NADH peroxidase was positively-activated by the presence of oxygen and had a long induction time in contrast to NADH oxidase. These observations indicated that a coupled NADH oxidase - NADH peroxidase system was the main oxidative stress resistance mechanism in L. panis PM1, and was regulated by oxygen availability. Under aerobic conditions, NADH is mainly reoxidized by the NADH oxidase - peroxidase system rather than through the production of ethanol (or 1,3-propanediol or succinic acid production if glycerol or citric acid is available). This system helped L. panis PM1 directly use oxygen in its energy metabolism by producing extra ATP in contrast to homofermentative lactobacilli.
- Lactobacillus panis
- NADH oxidase
- NADH peroxidase
- Electron acceptor
- Hydrogen peroxide
Lactobacillus panis PM1 is an aerotolerant and obligatory heterofermentative microorganism isolated from bioethanol thin stillage, and has been the focus of attention due to its ability to produce 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) during the fermentation of glycerol under anaerobic conditions (Khan et al. 2013). Lactobacillus panis belongs to the group III heterofermentative lactobacilli, which includes L. brevis, L. buchneri and L. reuteri, where the 6-phosphogluconate/phosphoketolase (6-PG/PK) pathway is the primary carbohydrate fermentation pathway (Khan et al. 2013; Luthi-Peng et al. 2002; Pedersen et al. 2004; Veiga-da-Cunha and Foster 1992). In theory, when one glucose molecule is consumed, three NADH and one ATP molecules are generated. Subsequently, one pyruvic acid and one acetyl phosphate molecules accept protons from one and two NADH molecules, respectively, and regenerate NAD+. End-products of this metabolism are lactic acid and ethanol, respectively. Overall heterolactic fermentation of glucose through the 6-PG/PK pathway results in 1 mol each of lactic acid, ethanol, and CO2 and 1 mol ATP per mol glucose consumed (Kandler 1983).
For heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB), external electron acceptors can be used as alternate routes to reproduce NAD+. The presence or absence of electron acceptors determine whether ethanol (and no more ATP) or acetic acid (and 1 additional ATP) is produced from a glucose molecule (Chen and McFeeters 1986; Condon 1987; McFeeters and Chen 1986; Talarico et al. 1990; Veiga-da-Cunha and Foster 1992). For example, when glycerol exists, the regeneration of NAD+ for glucose metabolism can be achieved through the conversion of glycerol to 1,3-PDO using glycerol as the electron receptor (Saxena et al. 2009; Veiga-da-Cunha and Foster 1992). The presence of external electron acceptors, therefore, affects the energy metabolism and end-product profiles, as well as further fermentation applications of LAB.
Molecular oxygen can act as an external electron acceptor and can be advantageous to LAB during cell growth, and its presence in culture conditions greatly influences the physiology of many LAB (An et al. 2010; Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Marty-Teysset et al. 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2003). While oxygen itself is not toxic, reactive oxygen species (ROS; including the superoxide anion radical (O2 -), the hydroxyl radical (·OH), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)) which are produced during cellular processes can cause a variety of damage to the cell (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2003). Unlike aerobes and facultative anaerobes, such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, that have evolved efficient mechanisms for protection against ROS (Farr and Kogoma 1991), LAB lack catalases and functional cytochrome oxidases required for energy-linked oxygen metabolism (An et al. 2011; An et al. 2010; Jansch et al. 2011). Some LAB possess oxidases that utilize molecular oxygen to oxidize substrates such pyruvate or NADH (Condon 1987; Marty-Teysset et al. 2000; Sedewitz et al. 1984). Generally, NADH oxidase is the most common oxidative enzyme in LAB and the systems are often oxygen-inducible (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Komagata 1996; Miyoshi et al. 2003). However, the activity of NADH oxidase can produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) which can then directly oxidize protein cysteinyl residues and inactivate enzymes (Miyoshi et al. 2003). Hydrogen peroxide can also react with cations, such as Fe2+ and Cu2+, giving rise to hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction (Miyoshi et al. 2003).
Therefore, the presence of oxygen in the growth environment of LAB will induce oxidative stress to which bacteria have various responses mechanisms. A common oxidative stress resistance mechanism found in LAB is a coupled NADH oxidase - NADH peroxidase system (Miyoshi et al. 2003). In these coupled reactions, intracellular oxygen is first used to oxidize NADH into NAD+ by NADH oxidase, thereby releasing H2O2. Subsequently, H2O2 is reduced to H2O by NADH peroxidase (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2003). However, the activity of NADH peroxidase is generally low (10 to 30 times lower than that of NADH oxidase) in L. lactis and has not been detected in some latobacillus strains. Thus, cellular H2O2 detoxification is inefficient in some LAB capable of producing H2O2 under aerobic conditions (Anders et al. 1970; Komagata 1996).
Our previous research showed that the presence of oxygen during the fermentation of glycerol by L. panis PM1 negatively affected cell growth, glucose consumption, and end-product production, including 1,3-PDO. The protection mechanism towards oxidative stress is a key element to optimize L. panis PM1 for 1,3-PDO production in biofuel waste material applications. The NADH oxidase - NADH peroxidase system and conversion of glycerol to 1,3-PDO both use NADH as a key factor for their reactions. Therefore, the clarification of the control of oxidative stress by this strain can shed light on how it regulates 1,3-PDO production. In this study, we clearly demonstrated the oxygen-dependent function of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase and its involvement in the NAD+ regeneration system of L. panis PM1.
All chemicals used in this study were ACS grade, or better, and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Lactobacillus panis PM1 was isolated from bioethanol thin stillage in our lab (International Depository Authority of Canada; accession number 180310–01). Strain PM1 was cultured at 37°C using commercial MRS medium (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) until late log phase and was then transferred to modified MRS medium (mMRS). The mMRS medium consisted of 10 g glucose, 5 g yeast extract, 10 g peptone, 10 g meat extract, 2 g K2HPO4, 2 g ammonium citrate, 5 g sodium acetate, 100 mg MgSO4·7H2O, 50 mg MnSO4, along with a defined concentration of electron acceptors, such as citric acid (26 mM) or glycerol (160 mM) per litre. The cultures were incubated at 37°C under aerobic or microaerobic conditions. Aerobic and microaerobic cultures were grown using the same medium and temperature. Continuous aeration was provided to aerobic cultures by agitation; whereas, air-tight 15 ml tubes, filled to the two-thirds level, were incubated under static conditions to establish microaerobic conditions. It should be noted that our previous study (Khan et al. 2013) indicated there was little difference in the behaviour of L. panis PM1 under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions, thus we did not include anaerobic culture in this study.
Quantification of H2O2 production
Lactobacillus panis PM1 cells were removed from the culture media using centrifugation (14,000 × g, 5 min). Hydrogen peroxide concentrations of the cell-free media were measured in accordance with the Pierce Quantitative Peroxide Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) based on oxidation of ferrous to ferric ion in the presence of xylenol orange.
RNA was extracted from Lactobacillus panis PM1 cells by the hot phenol extraction method, as described by Oh and So (2003) with minor modifications. Briefly, 10 ml of exponentially-growing bacteria from liquid media were added to a tube containing 1.25 ml of ice-cold ethanol/phenol stop solution (5% water-saturated phenol, pH < 4.5, in 95% ethanol), and harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 x g. The cell pellets were resuspended in 600 μl of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. Glass beads (0.8 g, 452–600 μm in diameter; Sigma) and 600 μl of pre-warmed acid-hot phenol:chloroform:isoamylacohol (PCI, 25:24:1, v/v) were added to the cell suspensions, and the mixture was incubated at 65°C for 10 min with vigorous vortexing for 30 sec duration every 30 sec. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 x g and then the supernatants (500 μl) were transferred to fresh 1.5-ml micro-tubes containing 500 μl of the pre-warmed PCI and incubated at 65°C for 5 min with vortexing every 30 sec. Samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 x g. The aqueous layer (400 μl) was transferred into new 1.5-ml micro-tubes and mixed with 95% ethanol (800 μl) and 3 M sodium acetate (40 μl). The mixtures were kept at −80°C for 30 min and centrifuged at 14,000 x g. The RNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 50 μl of RNase-free water. RNA was treated with DNase and purified using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada). The quantity of RNA was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (optical density (OD) 1 at A260 = 40 μg · ml-1 RNA), using a DU 800 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Mississauga, ON, Canada), and its purity was determined by measuring the A260/A280 ratio.
Sequences of primers used for qRT_PCR in this study
Nucleotide sequence (5’ → 3’)
16S ribosomal RNA
Normalized expression ratio of nox and npx (test) = 2–ΔΔCt.
The Real-Time data were processed using CFX Manager Software (Bio-Rad).
Preparation of crude extracts
Lactobacillus panis PM1 cells grown to mid-exponential phase under microaerobic or aerobic conditions were harvested by centrifugation, washed with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and the cells in pellets were then disrupted using sonication (three times for 1 min with a 3 min rest interval at output level 2, Sonifier 450; Branson, CT, USA) using the same buffer. Crude extract was obtained by centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 x g, and protein concentration was determined using the Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase activities were determined by measuring the H2O2 concentration generated and decomposed by the crude extracts, respectively. The assay mixture contained 200 μM of the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and 20 μM flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD+) in 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.0. The assay was carried out at 30°C under aerated or microaerobic conditions. For the NADH peroxidase assay, hydrogen peroxide was added into the above assay mixture to an initial concentration of 30 μM. The concentrations of H2O2 generated or decomposed were quantified as described above. In these determinations, one unit of activity corresponds to the generation (for NADH oxidase) and decomposition (for NADH peroxidase) of one μmol of H2O2 in one minute.
Determination of glucose and end-products
Culture optical density was measured as an index of growth at 600 nm with a DU 800 spectrophotometer. After centrifugation, the supernatant was filtered through 0.22-μm pore size filters and stored at −20°C for HPLC analysis. To quantify the concentration of glucose, organic acids and ethanol, samples were analyzed on an organic acid column (HPX-87H; Bio-Rad) using an HPLC system equipped with a refractive index detector (RID G1362A, 1100 series; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Operating conditions were determined by the method described in the column manual with minor modifications. Filtered culture medium (40 μl) was loaded on the column and eluted with 5 mM sulfuric acid at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min at 55°C for 30 min.
For growth experiments and determinations of H2O2 concentrations, data are presented as the mean values calculated from at least three independent experiments. For activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase, standard errors of the means from at least three independent experiments were also calculated and presented. Differences in culture and enzyme assay conditions with NADH oxidase or NADH peroxidase activity (unit/mg protein) were analyzed by the t test (Mann–Whitney test) for two groups or the one-way ANOVA test (Kruskal-Wallis test) for three groups using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Influence of oxygen on the physiology of L. panis PM1
Production of H2O2 by aerobic culture and its effects on bacterial growth
Specific activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase
The specific activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase of L. panis PM1
Enzyme sources a
Enzyme assay conditions
Enzyme activity b
Relative gene expression level j
158.8 ± 7.6 d
148.3 ± 9.7 h
1.50 ± 0.30
1.16 ± 0.28
144.0 ± 2.0 e
1.00 ± 0.22
1.00 ± 0.10
92.5 ± 2.2 f
197.3 ± 1.7 i
103.1 ± 5.6 g
Role of oxygen in oxidative stress
The result of cell growth and specific activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase according to oxygen availability
Cell Growth (OD600) a
NADH oxidase activity b
177.6 ± 3.0
193.2 ± 2.5
192.8 ± 5.7
NADH peroxidase activity b
120.1 ± 12.51
The change of NADH flux by NADH oxidase
We previously reported the aerotolerant nature of L. panis PM1 and its ability to use glycerol as the means of NADH recycling in the absence of oxygen (Khan et al. 2013). However, the presence of oxygen prevented 1,3-PDO formation and thus markedly-affected NADH recycling in this strain. In this study, the influence of oxygen on NADH recycling system and the oxidative stress resistance mechanism in its aerotolerance was investigated. Moreover, the metabolic profile was further investigated to understand how oxidative stress resistance mechanisms of L. panis PM1 influenced the profile of metabolic end-products.
During aerobic culture, L. panis PM1 prematurely entered into a stationary phase without depleting glucose (Figure 1a). This early entry into stationary phase was also associated with a ten-fold higher accumulation of H2O2 compared with microaerobic culture (Figure 2a). Therefore, the accumulation of H2O2 in aerobic culture was an apparent reason for the early cessation of growth. Anaerobic metabolism theoretically makes one ethanol per every glucose consumed, but the presence of oxygen altered this pattern to less than 1:1 ratio. These observations suggested that H2O2 could be a main end-product of an alternate pathway for NADH recycling under aerobic conditions, and that this could compete with NAD+-regeneration through ethanol production.
The production of H2O2 by LAB grown under aerobic conditions is commonly the result of flavoprotein oxidases, including NADH oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, α-glycerophosphate oxidase, and superoxide dismutase (Condon 1987). However, candidate genes for these enzymes were not found in the draft genome data of L. panis PM1, with the exception of NADH oxidase. Pyruvate oxidase has been documented in a few species of lactobacilli and is known to convert pyruvate to CO2 and acetyl phosphate, along with the formation H2O2 (Condon 1987). Pyruvate oxidase has its highest activity during the early stationary phase of growth and is induced and repressed by oxygen and glucose, respectively, in L. plantarum (Saxena et al. 2009; Veiga-da-Cunha and Foster 1992). However, the presence of pyruvate oxidase does not adequately explain the early entry into stationary phase observed during the aerobic culture of L. panis PM1. Our results showed that most of pyruvate produced during glucose consumption was used to produce lactate in aerobic culture (Figure 1a), indicating that pyruvate oxidase apparently removed little pyruvate from this pathway. NADH oxidase is the most common enzyme responsible for the production of H2O2 from oxygen and is highly-active in LAB (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Tachon et al. 2011). LAB are known to possess either a NADH: H2O2 or a NADH: H2O oxidase, or sometimes both (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000). Final products of the reaction of NADH oxidase include either NAD+ and H2O2, or NAD+ and H2O, depending on whether two- or four-electrons are transferred by NADH: H2O2 oxidase or NADH: H2O oxidase (Condon 1987; Higuchi et al. 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2003). Our results showed that the crude extract from L. panis PM1 cultured under aerobic and microaerobic conditions could directly produce H2O2 using oxygen as a substrate, and the activity of the enzyme was found to increase with the addition of FAD+ as well as aeration of the assay mixture (approximately 1.5 fold). These results indicated that the NADH oxidase in L. panis PM1 was a NADH: H2O2 oxidase and a flavoprotein-like NADH oxidase, as seen in other gram-positive bacteria (Komagata 1996; Marty-Teysset et al. 2000; Tachon et al. 2011).
Most LAB can respond (and protect themselves) to high concentrations of H2O2 produced through their oxidase enzymes during sugar fermentation (Higuchi et al. 2000). In fact, most LAB possess NADH peroxidase or pseudocatalase, and superoxide dismutase exists in some LAB (Condon 1987). These enzymes can enable LAB to overcome otherwise-lethal concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. The annotation data of the L. panis PM1 genome sequence and the results of the enzyme assays of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase suggest that these enzymes are main factors in oxidative stress resistance. The levels of accumulated H2O2 in the culture media could be accounted for by the differences in the activities of NADH peoxidase and NADH oxidase. Our qRT-PCR analyses showed that oxygen did not regulate nox and npx at the transcriptional-level, and mainly affected enzyme activities in L. panis PM1 (Table 2). While transcription levels were similar, activity assays exhibited that NADH peroxidase was positively-activated by oxygen but required a long induction time to express activity contrary to NADH oxidase. The oxygen-availability analyses indicated that higher oxygen availability in the 3-ml culture could provide higher amounts of substrate (oxygen) for NADH oxidase, resulting in greater accumulation of H2O2 in the first 12 hours. In the subsequent 12 hours, the accumulated H2O2 was decomposed by NADH peroxidase activity. The degree of degradation of H2O2 was dependent on NADH peroxidase activity, and the amount of activity was in proportion with oxygen availability (Figure 3 and Table 3). Therefore, we concluded that a coupled NADH oxidase - NADH peroxidase system, regulated by oxygen availability, was a key oxidative stress resistance mechanism in L. panis PM1.
Accumulation of H2O2 by NADH oxidase has been reported in group I homofermentative lactobacilli, like L. delbrueckii, where approximate 97% of NADH was reoxidized by lactate dehydrogenase and NADH oxidase accounted for only 3% of NADH reoxidation (Marty-Teysset et al. 2000). Thus, NADH recycling in group I LAB depends on a pyruvate supply from glycolysis, rather than oxygen. Unlike homofermentative lactobacilli, the presence of electron acceptors, such as oxygen, citric acid, or glycerol, directly influenced the flux of NADH reoxidation in L. panis PM1. In our other studies, when L. panis PM1 was cultured in mMRS containing citric acid (24 mM) and glycerol (150 mM) under microaerobic conditions, the major changes in end-product formation included a decrease in ethanol, an increase in acetic acid, and the production of succinic acid (19 mM) and 1,3-PDO (88 mM), respectively (unpublished data). The results of HPLC analyses in the present study showed that aerobic conditions negatively-affected the production of ethanol relative to glucose consumption, regardless of the presence of electron acceptors (Figures 1a and 4). Also, when L. panis PM1 was cultured under aerobic conditions in mMRS containing citric acid and glycerol, oxygen was used as the preferred electron acceptor, resulting in a shift of NADH flux along with a significant decrease of the production of succinic acid (4 mM) and 1,3-PDO (7 mM) (Figure 4). This data indicated that the activity of NADH oxidase was a key mechanism for the reoxidation of NADH during growth in aerobic culture.
In addition to oxidative stress responses, NADH oxidase can also help L. panis PM1 use oxygen during energy metabolism, directly. That is, the shift of NADH recycling with molecular oxygen redirected acetyl phosphate, which normally would be used to produce ethanol, to the formation of acetic acid. This acetic acid production via acetate kinase can stoichiometrically generate ATP (Condon 1987). Thus, O2-directed NADH recycling should be advantageous with respect to energy metabolism. However, regeneration of NAD+ via NADH oxidase in L. panis PM1 led to overproduction of H2O2 with subsequent negative effects on growth and end-product formation. Our findings indicate that varied oxygen availabilities of culture environments would greatly affect energy metabolism as well as oxidative stress of L. panis PM1. The formation of 1,3-PDO is a main route for NADH reoxidation in the presence of glycerol under anaerobic conditions; whereas, under aerobic conditions, NADH recycling largely occurs through NADH oxidase activity. The present study indicates that energy metabolism via the NADH oxidase system explains why L. panis PM1 fails to produce 1,3-PDO under aerobic conditions.
The authors acknowledge the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund and Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada for supporting this research.
- An H, Zhai Z, Yin S, Luo Y, Han B, Hao Y: Coexpression of the superoxide dismutase and the catalase provides remarkable oxidative stress resistance in Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J Agric Food Chem 2011,59(8):3851–3856. 10.1021/jf200251kPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- An H, Zhou H, Huang Y, Wang G, Luan C, Mou J, Luo Y, Hao Y: High-level expression of heme-dependent catalase gene katA from Lactobacillus Sakei protects Lactobacillus rhamnosus from oxidative stress. Mol Biotechnol 2010,45(2):155–160. 10.1007/s12033-010-9254-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anders RF, Hogg DM, Jago GR: Formation of hydrogen peroxide by group N streptococci and its effect on their growth and metabolism. Appl Microbiol 1970,19(4):608–612.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen K-H, McFeeters RF: Utilization of electron acceptors for anaerobic metabolism by Lactobacillus plantarum. Enzymes and intermediates in the utilization of citrate. Food microbiology 1986, 3: 83–92.Google Scholar
- Condon S: Responses of lactic acid bacteria to oxyben. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1987, 46: 269–280. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02465.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farr SB, Kogoma T: Oxidative stress responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiol Rev 1991,55(4):561–585.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higuchi M, Yamamoto Y, Kamio Y: Molecular biology of oxygen tolerance in lactic acid bacteria: Functions of NADH oxidases and Dpr in oxidative stress. J Biosci Bioeng 2000,90(5):484–493.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansch A, Freiding S, Behr J, Vogel RF: Contribution of the NADH-oxidase (Nox) to the aerobic life of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DSM20451T. Food microbiology 2011,28(1):29–37. 10.1016/j.fm.2010.08.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kandler O: Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1983,49(3):209–224. 10.1007/BF00399499PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan NH, Kang TS, Grahame DA, Haakensen MC, Ratanapariyanuch K, Reaney MJ, Korber DR, Tanaka T: Isolation and characterization of novel 1,3-propanediol-producing Lactobacillus panis PM1 from bioethanol thin stillage. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013,97(1):417–428. 10.1007/s00253-012-4386-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Komagata MSK: Aerobic growth of and activities of NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase in lactic acid bacteria. J Ferment Bioeng 1996,82(3):210–216. 10.1016/0922-338X(96)88810-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods (San Diego, Calif 2001,25(4):402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luthi-Peng Q, Dileme FB, Puhan Z: Effect of glucose on glycerol bioconversion by Lactobacillus reuteri. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002,59(2–3):289–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marty-Teysset C, de la Torre F, Garel J: Increased production of hydrogen peroxide by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus upon aeration: involvement of an NADH oxidase in oxidative stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000,66(1):262–267. 10.1128/AEM.66.1.262-267.2000PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McFeeters RF, Chen K-H: Utilization of electron acceptors for anaerobic mannitol metabolism by Lactobacillus plantarum, Compounds which serve as electron acceptors. Food microbiology 1986, 3: 73–81. 10.1016/S0740-0020(86)80029-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi A, Rochat T, Gratadoux JJ, Le Loir Y, Oliveira SC, Langella P, Azevedo V: Oxidative stress in Lactococcus lactis. Genet Mol Res 2003,2(4):348–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh ET, So JS: A rapid method for RNA preparation from Gram-positive bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 2003,52(3):395–398. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00218-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen C, Jonsson H, Lindberg JE, Roos S: Microbiological characterization of wet wheat distillers’ grain, with focus on isolation of lactobacilli with potential as probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004,70(3):1522–1527. 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1522-1527.2004PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saxena RK, Anand P, Saran S, Isar J: Microbial production of 1,3-propanediol: Recent developments and emerging opportunities. Biotechnol Adv 2009,27(6):895–913. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.07.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sedewitz B, Schleifer KH, Gotz F: Purification and biochemical characterization of pyruvate oxidase from Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol 1984,160(1):273–278.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tachon S, Chambellon E, Yvon M: Identification of a conserved sequence in flavoproteins essential for the correct conformation and activity of the NADH oxidase NoxE of Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriology 2011,193(12):3000–3008. 10.1128/JB.01466-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talarico TL, Axelsson LT, Novotny J, Fiuzat M, Dobrogosz WJ: Utilization of Glycerol as a Hydrogen Acceptor by Lactobacillus reuteri: Purification of 1,3-Propanediol:NAD Oxidoreductase. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990,56(4):943–948.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veiga-da-Cunha M, Foster MA: 1,3-Propanediol:NAD + oxidoreductases of Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992,58(6):2005–2010.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.