Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Comparison of the intensity of biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes using classical culture-based method and digital droplet PCR

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium, commonly found in food, water or sewage. This microorganism is capable of forming biofilm on different surfaces such as steel, glass, polypropylene etc. Recently an increase in cases of listeriosis has been noted, making L. monocytogenes the important health threat. Therefore, there is a need for rapid and sensitive detection of this pathogen. This study aimed to compare the number of L. monocytogenes cells recovered from the biofilm (prepared on steel and polypropylene) using the detection and amplification of the hlyA gene (droplet digital PCR, ddPCR) and the classical culture method. The research material consisted of 96 L. monocytogenes strains. A total of 58 isolates were obtained from clinical samples and 38 isolates derived from the municipal sewage treatment plant. Additionally, the reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020) was used. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the results obtained by the classical culture-based method and ddPCR was 0.864 and 0.725, for biofilms produced on AISI 304 stainless steel surface and the polypropylene surface, respectively. Correlations were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001), indicating that the ddPCR technique is an effective tool for the assessment of bacteria number in the biofilm.

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic, non sporulating bacterium, widespread in the environment i.e. soil, water, sewage, faeces of humans and animals (Camejo et al. 2011; Wałecka et al. 2009). L. monocytogenes is an etiological factor of human listeriosis. People particularly vulnerable to infection are the elderly, pregnant women and newborns (Schuppler and Loessner 2010). In 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reported 2480 confirmed cases of invasive listeriosis in 28 European Union countries, of which 227 were fatal (EFSA and ECDC 2018). The occurrence of L. monocytogenes in wastewater was reported in the 1980s (Al-Ghazali and Al-Azawi 1986). Al-Ghazali and Al-Azawi (1986) demonstrated that L. monocytogenes can survive in the sludge for 13 months. L. monocytogenes may also be present in the influent wastewater used for the plant treatment (i.e. raw) and wastewater drying process does not lead to its eradication (Al-Ghazali and Al-Azawi 1988). Since contamination of raw sewage with these bacteria can be high the use of sewage sludge as an agricultural fertilizer can be a potential source of soil pollution.(Al-Ghazali and Al-Azawi 1986).

Classic microbiological methods are widely used all over the world, but since they are time-consuming (24 to 48 h), their use in the control of environmental pollution and food is limited (Bian et al. 2015). In addition, early and rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria in the material collected from patients is crucial for the effective treatment of human infections and prevention of epidemic spread. Increasingly, methods based on the analysis of the nucleic acid such as: PCR, real time-PCR (qPCR), DNA microarrays, biosensors (electrochemistry manual, optical), as well as immunological methods are utilized (Mortari and Lorenzelli 2014; Law et al. 2015). The qPCR method is a sensitive and specific technology used to quantify nucleic acids in a sample (Bian et al. 2015). This method requires highly purified DNA template, and a representative sample size (Rossmanith and Wagner 2011). In this technique the DNA amount is proportional to the fluorescence, which is monitored at each cycle of PCR. The point at which the amount of DNA increases and the fluorescence exceeds the background level is called the threshold cycle (CT) or crossing point. By using multiple dilutions of a known amount of standard DNA, a standard curve of concentration in log scale against CT can be generated. The amount of DNA or cDNA in an unknown sample can then be calculated from its CT value. The level of sample contamination affects the effectiveness of qPCR. Samples with a low DNA concentration and high impurity cannot be diluted properly. Additionally, any chemical and/or protein impurities change the Taq polymerase activity and primers binding, which impact the CT values (Taylor et al. 2017). The qPCR technique has been used to determine the level of expression of genes involved in biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes (agr and prfA) (Gandra et al. 2019). Third-generation PCR, known as a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), allows fast and quantitative detection (Cremonesi et al. 2016). Droplet digital PCR, based on the amplification of a single target DNA molecule in a plurality of separate droplets, enables an exact quantification of DNA copy numbers (Witte et al. 2016b). The principle of ddPCR method is founded on DNA analysis according to the Poisson distribution. The reaction is divided into many small reactions (20,000 drops for the Bio-Rad system) that either contain DNA or not (Hindson et al. 2011). In addition to high precision and sensitivity, ddPCR ensures high reproducibility of the within-laboratory scale (Quan et al. 2018). This method has been used, among others for: routine analysis of genetically modified organisms in food and animal feed (Gerdes et al. 2016); detection and quantification of pathogens such as Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni and L. monocytogenes in the environmental water (Rothrock et al. 2013) and monitoring of the dynamics of the microbial population in soils (Kim et al. 2014). Advantages of ddPCR, compared to qPCR, are the absolute quantification of a target nucleic acid (without the use of calibration curves) (Hindson et al. 2011; Pinheiro et al. 2012), high sensitivity and accuracy for nucleic acids with the low copy number (Sanders et al. 2011; Whale et al. 2012). In turn, the automation of droplet generation in ddPCR method reduces the risk of laboratory errors (Witte et al. 2016a). However, there is still a risk of cross-contamination during droplets transfer. For this reason, fully automatic closed systems have been developed. New capillary-based integrated ddPCR system limits cross-contamination. A HPLC T-junction is used to generate droplets and a long HPLC capillary connects the generator with both a capillary-based thermocycler and a capillary-based cytometer (Chen et al. 2018).

Listeria monocytogenes is capable of forming a biofilm on many surfaces, both hydrophilic and hydrophobic, which allows the persistence of the pathogen in the environment, food processing wastewater or sewage (Barbosa et al. 2013). Additionally, in the biofilm structure the bacterium shows higher antimicrobial resistance compared to the planktonic forms (Pan et al. 2006). Currently, several methods are known for the assessment of bacterial adhesion and ability to form biofilm. Among the classical methods, culture methods, microscopic techniques (Chae and Schraft 2000) and spectrophotometric measurement of the biofilm stained with colored substances (crystal violet) (Pan et al. 2006) are used. Also metabolic tests allowing quantification of bacterial viability in the biofilm structure are applied (Gamble and Muriana 2007). The use of ddPCR (Klančnik et al. 2015) is a new approach to assess the cell adhesion in biofilm structure. Ricchi et al. (2017), comparing the application of PCRs (qPCR and ddPCR) with the culture methods for the quantification of L. monocytogenes number, have found that PCR may be a valid alternative.

The aim of the study was to assess the number of L. monocytogenes cells recovered from the biofilms on steel and polypropylene, based on the detection and amplification of a single copy of hlyA gene, using the ddPCR technique. The effectiveness of this method was compared with the classical culture-based method.

Materials and methods

Material

The study covered 96 strains of L. monocytogenes, of which 58 were isolated from clinical samples and 38 strains were selected from the environment of the municipal sewage treatment plant in Northern Poland. The reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020) was also included in the study. As this strain was described as the reference strain in the food testing applications, we used it in our study for the evaluation of biofilm formation on surfaces frequently used in the food industry. All strains used in the study are from the collection of the Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. The origin of the strains is presented in Table 1. Strains derived from the clinical material were isolated in 2005–2017, and environmental strains were obtained in 2013–2014 from the municipal sewage treatment plant. Examined isolates were stored at − 80 °C in BHI broth (Brain Heart Infusion, bioMérieux) with the addition of 15% glycerol (Avantor).

Table 1 Listeria monocytogenes strains origin

Genetic similarity

The genetic similarity of selected L. monocytogenes strains was determined with the Pulsed-Field Gene Electrophoresis (PFGE). The procedure for genotyping was performed in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedure for PulseNet PFGE of Listeria monocytogenes (PNL04, last update April 2014) (PulseNet 2013).

Isolation of genomic DNA

Isolation of genomic DNA was performed using the Genomic Mini AX Bacteria Spin Kit (A&A Biotechnology), according to the manufacturer’s procedure.

Classical culture-based method

Assessment of the biofilm formation by the examined L. monocytogenes strains was performed on sterile parts of stainless steel ASI 304 (BTH Import Stal) and polypropylene (Quadrant EPP Poland Sp.) with dimensions of 1 × 2 cm and a thickness of 1 mm. The intensity of biofilm formation was determined as previously described (Skowron et al. 2019).

The tested strains were plated onto Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood (CAB) (bioMérieux) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The grown colonies were used to prepare 3 ml of the suspension (0.5 of MacFarland scale) in BHI (Becton–Dickinson). Sterile polypropylene or stainless steel fragments were placed in the prepared bacterial suspensions and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The negative control constituted sterile parts of polypropylene and stainless steel incubated in sterile BHI medium in the same conditions. Then the fragments were washed with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.2 (Avantor) and placed in sterile BHI medium. This operation was repeated after another 24 h of incubation. After this time, the surfaces were washed twice with PBS (pH 7.2) to remove the planktonic cells. Then the samples were sonicated (Ultrasonic DU-4, Nickel-Electro) with the following parameters: operating frequency—30 kHz, power—150 W, temperature 25 °C for 10 min and shaking (500×g) for 10 min. A serial tenfold dilutions (10−6) in PBS (pH 7.2) of bacterial suspensions were made and plated onto CAB agar (0.1 ml). After 24 h of aerobic incubation at 37 °C the number of colonies was counted. The results were presented as the number of colony forming units per 1 cm2 surface (CFU × cm−2) of ASI 304 stainless steel or polypropylene.

Digital PCR droplet

In the first stage of the study, the biofilm was prepared according to the procedure described above. The sonicated samples were shaken and centrifuged (9700×g, 5 min) and then for each sample DNA was isolated. The quality and concentration of DNA was checked using the BioPhotometer D30 spectrophotometer (Eppendorf).

The ddPCR method was performed using the QX200™ Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR™) system (Bio-Rad). A region of L. monocytogenes listeriolysin O gene (hlyA) was used as a target for PCR amplification. The forward primer (5ʹ-ACTGAAGCAAAGGATGCATCTG-3ʹ) and the reverse primer (5ʹ-TTTTCGATTGGCGTCTTAGGA-3ʹ) were used to amplify a 106-bp segment of the hlyA gene (Suo et al. 2010). This gene is constitutive and species-specific for L. monocytogenes.

A 22 µl of reaction mix contained: 11 µl of QX200™ ddPCR™ EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad), 0.22 µl of each primer (100 µM) (Oligo.pl), 1 µl of genomic DNA and ultra pure water. The reaction mixture was then placed in a drop generator (QX200™ Droplet Generator) (Bio-Rad) to produce, after combining with the oil, about 20,000 drops of equal volume and size (QX200™ Droplet Generation Oil for EvaGreen) (Bio-Rad). The control of the drop generation process was a reaction mixture containing ultra-pure water instead of DNA.

Reaction was performed in a thermocycler C1000 Touch™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) with the following conditions for the amplification: initial denaturation (95 °C/5 min), 40 cycles of denaturation (95 °C/30 s), annealing (58 °C/30 s) and elongation (72 °C/1 min) and the final elongation (72 °C/10 min). The PCR products were denatured at 98 °C for 10 min and kept at 4 °C until the droplets were read.

In the next step, plates were placed in a drop reader (Bio-Rad) and the results were read determining the cut-off point. The fluorescence amplitude threshold, used for the discrimination of the positive and negative droplets in QuantaSoft software was set between 7000 and 8000. This value was chosen after optimization of the probe concentration and annealing temperature in the ddPCR assay. The concentration values were calculated using QuantaSoft software (in copies μl−1) and multiplied by 22 (the initial PCR volume) to obtain the absolute number of copies added to the reaction.

Statistical analysis

The analysis of the obtained results was carried out using STATISTICA 13.1 PL (StatSoft) program based on the Tukey post hoc test. The differences were considered statistically significant at the probability level of p < 0.05. The correlation between the intensity of biofilm formation, assessed by the classical culture-based method, and ddPCR was made using the interpretation of the Pearson correlation coefficient in relation to the Guillford scale. Correlations were considered statistically significant for the test probability p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Genetic similarity of Listeria monocytogenes strains

All strains used in experiment were genetically different (Fig. 1). The cut-off value to define the PFGE patterns was set at 80% similarity. For the cut-off at level of 80%, 3 clusters (C3, C8 and C10) containing 3 strains and 7 clusters (C1, C2, C4, C5, C6, C7 and C9) containing 2 strains were found (Table 2). With the exception of the C8 cluster, all clusters included strains isolated from the same material. Cluster C1 included strains originating from the inflowing sewage, cluster C10—strains from the raw sludge, and the other clusters—strains derived from blood. Cluster C8 included 1 strain isolated from the stabilized sludge and 2 strains derived from the air of the wastewater treatment plant (Table 2). Together, 23 strains were classified into similarity clusters. The rest of strains showed no genetic similarity and were not included in any cluster.

Fig. 1
figure1

Dendrogram of ApaI-PFGE cluster analysis of 96 L. monocytogenes isolates with sample identification data. 1_K-58_K, clinical samples; 1_OS-13_OS; 1_ŚD-18_ŚD;1_OSTAB-6_OSTAB; 1_POW-3_POW, environmental samples

Table 2 The cluster of genetic similarity determined for tested strains at cut-off level of 80%

Classical culture-based method

The obtained results allowed to observe differences in the intensity of biofilm formation on the surface of polypropylene and ASI 304 stainless steel by the tested strains of L. monocytogenes. The calculated differences in the intensity of biofilm formation between two tested surfaces were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Differences in the intensity of biofilm formation by the tested L. monocytogenes strains on the surface of polypropylene and stainless steel. a, b, c,… - values marked with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05)

The number of bacteria reisolated from polypropylene ranged from 4.26 log CFU × cm−2 to 7.97 log CFU × cm−2. The recovery of the cells from the biofilm formed on fragments of polypropylene was 5.64 log CFU × cm−1 for the reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020). The biofilm formation intensity on the polypropylene surface varied between the tested L. monocytogenes strains (Table 3). It was found that strains weakly forming biofilm were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more often among strains isolated from the clinical material. On the other hand, very strong biofilm-formers were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more frequently isolated from the environment of sewage treatment plants (Table 3).

Table 3 Classification of tested L. monocytogenes rods depending on the biofilm formation intensity based on the number of bacteria isolated from the polypropylene surface in a quantitative method

The number of bacteria reisolated from the steel surface ranged from 4.28 log CFU × cm−2 to 7.90 log CFU × cm−2. For the reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020) the number of recovered bacteria was 5.98 log CFU × cm−1. The tested isolates showed different strength of biofilm formation on the steel surface (Table 4). The strains of weak and moderate biofilm formation ability were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more often found among the strains isolated from the sewage treatment plant. In contrast, strains strongly and very strongly forming biofilm on the steel surface were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more frequently detected among the clinical strains (Table 4).

Table 4 Classification of tested L. monocytogenes rods depending on the biofilm formation intensity based on the number of bacteria isolated from the steel surface in a quantitative method

ddPCR

The number of copies of the hlyA gene in samples from the polypropylene surface ranged from 4.53 log ncg to 6.40 log ncg. For the reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020) the number of the hlyA gene copies was 5.28 log ngc (polypropylene). The correlation between strains origin and biofilm intensity was noted. The strains of weak biofilm forming ability were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more often isolated from the clinical material. On the other hand, strains that strongly formed biofilm on the examined surface were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more frequently isolated from the environment of sewage treatment plants (Table 5).

Table 5 Classification of tested L. monocytogenes rods depending on the biofilm formation ability on the polypropylene surface based on the number of copies of the hlyA gene assessed by droplet digital PCR

The number of copies of the hlyA gene in samples from the stainless steel surface ranged from 4.55 log ncg to 8.46 log ncg. For the reference strain ATCC®19111™ (WDCM00020) the number of copies of the hlyA gene was 6.79 log ngc (steel). The study showed a diversified biofilm formation ability of the tested L. monocytogenes bacilli. It was observed that the strains weakly and moderately forming biofilm occurred statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more often among strains isolated from the sewage treatment plant environment. In turn, the strains strongly and very strongly forming biofilm on the examined surface were statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.001) more often found in the clinical material (Table 6).

Table 6 Classification of tested L. monocytogenes rods depending on the strength of biofilm formation on the steel surface based on the number of copies of the hlyA gene assessed by droplet digital PCR

Comparison of the intensity of biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes strains assessed by classical culture-based and ddPCR methods

The analysis of the relationship between the number of bacteria recovered from the biofilm formed on both tested surfaces and the number of hlyA gene copies detected in the sample showed a high positive correlation (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. 3
figure3

Correlation between the number of bacteria reisolated from the polypropylene surface and the number of copies of the hlyA gene in the sample for the tested strains of L. monocytogenes

Fig. 4
figure4

Correlation between the number of bacteria reisolated from the steel surface and the number of copies of the hlyA gene in the sample for the tested strains of L. monocytogenes

For the biofilm formed on the AISI 304 stainless steel surface, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the classical culture-based method and the ddPCR method was 0.864 (Fig. 3). In turn, for the biofilm formed on the polypropylene surface, the correlation coefficient was 0.725 (Fig. 4). In both cases coefficients were significant (p ≤ 0.001).

Discussion

Currently, one of the microbiological hazards is the ability of bacteria to develop biofilm, both on biotic and abiotic surfaces. In biofilm bacteria are more resistant than planktonic cells to adverse environmental conditions, including the action of antimicrobial substances such as antibiotics and disinfectants (Fagerlund et al. 2017). Due to the complex structure, biofilm eradication is a big challenge and encounters technical obstacles. Since traditional methods, based on the visualization of bacteria or determination of biofilm weight, are time-consuming there is a need for searching new methods allowing fast and precise quantification. The classical culture-based method in which colony forming units (CFU) are determined on agar medium, is commonly used in many laboratories, but has numerous disadvantages and limitations. Live bacteria detached from the biofilm layer may not be a representative part of the initial bacterial population in the biofilm. In addition, this method does not detect live bacteria not able to grow (viable but non-culturable (VBNC)) (Li et al. 2014). Digital droplet PCR seems to be a good alternative for classical culture-based methods, though this technique detects also extracellular DNA (eDNA) and DNA of dead cells, thereby possibly increasing the bacteria number (Klein et al. 2012). Therefore, it is of great importance to obtain pure and high-molecular (non-degraded) DNA (Quigley et al. 2012). In the present study, we used a column-based method (spin column-based nucleic acid purification) allowing fast and efficient DNA isolation.

The objective of the study was the comparison of classical culture-based method and a modern tool of molecular biology—ddPCR—for the assessment of the bacteria number in biofilms formed on steel and polypropylene surfaces. In the available literature these methods have not been compared so far. Klančnik et al. (2015) used ddPCR techniques for the first time to assess the number of L. monocytogenes in biofilm produced in microtiter plates. The specificity and sensitivity of qPCR and ddPCR assays, targeting listeriolysin O (hlyA) gene, have been reported previously (Klančnik et al. 2015; Traunšek et al. 2011). The hlyA gene is one of the most popular target gene for PCR amplification and has been shown to be specific for L. monocytogenes species. To date, ddPCR has been used for determination of number of foodborne pathogens (Bian et al. 2015; Porcellato et al. 2016; Suo et al. 2010), genetically modified organisms (GMO) (Koppel et al. 2015), virus HIV (Kiselinova et al. 2014), soil bacteria (Kim et al. 2014) and bacteria in surface waters (Cooley et al. 2018). It was mainly applied in studies where a small number of bacteria in the sample was expected (Porcellato et al. 2016). This method is not widely used in tests where the target molecules are abundant. Guilbaud et al. (2005) were first to use the real-time PCR method to detect and quantify L. monocytogenes in biofilm.

Our research showed a high positive correlation for both methods of biofilm formation assessment, on both tested surfaces. The Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.725 and 0.864 for the biofilm formed on the steel surface and on the polypropylene surface, respectively. Klančnik et al. (2015), in their research, compared various methods of DNA isolation and cell release from the biofilm layer, which may affect the effectiveness of real-time PCR. They showed that the most effective method for the isolation of cells from the biofilm, produced in the microtiter plates, was the heating of samples, 10-min sonication and centrifugation (2000×g for 5 min). In our research, we also applied 10-min sonication and sample centrifugation (9700×g for 5 min).

Bonsaglia et al. (2014) showed that the ability of L. monocytogenes to form biofilm is associated with the surface type on which it is formed. In our research, we did not observe statistically significant differences in the number of bacteria reisolated from steel and polypropylene surfaces. In the classical culture-based method, the number of bacteria recovered from the ASI 304 stainless steel surface ranged from 4.28 to 7.90 log CFU × cm−2, whereas for the polypropylene surface ranged from 4.26 to 7.96 CFU × cm−2. On the other hand, the intensity of biofilm formation was strain-dependent. Environmental strains formed significantly stronger biofilm on the polypropylene surface than clinical strains. The inverse relationship was observed for biofilms produced on the steel surface—clinical strains formed the biofilm with a statistically higher intensity compared with environmental strains. Similar results were obtained with both methods used in the study. Similar relations were also observed in the research of Barbosa et al. (2013). They noted that clinical L. monocytogenes isolates, 70.3% (n = 83) formed biofilm of low intensity, whereas only 3.4% (n = 4) of strains were strong biofilm formers (Barbosa et al. 2013). In turn, Doijad et al. (2015) observed that 55.6% of clinical isolates (n = 10) were characterized by low biofilm formation ability and 44.4% (n = 8) were classified as moderate biofilm-forming strains (Doijad et al. 2015).

Previous studies have reported that L. monocytogenes forms biofilm stronger on hydrophilic surfaces such as steel than hydrophobic ones e.g. polypropylene or polystyrene (Bonsaglia et al. 2014; Chavant et al. 2002; Di Bonaventura et al. 2008). In our research, we did not observe such a correlation. Nevertheless it should be pointed out that biofilm formation is influenced by other factors like temperature (Barbosa et al. 2013), nutrients availability (Kadam et al. 2013) and biofilm formation maturity (de Oliveira et al. 2010).

In our experiment two methods assessing the strength of biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes were compared. We showed a high positive correlation between the classical culture-based method and ddPCR, indicating the last one as a new tool for the assessment of the bacteria number in a biofilm.

In the available literature there is no data on the application of the ddPCR technique to assess the number of bacteria isolated from the biofilm formed on various surfaces. The present study showed a high positive correlation between the results obtained by the classical culture-based method and the ddPCR technique on both tested surfaces (ASI 304 steel and polypropylene). This technique can be an alternative to traditional time-consuming methods. Nonetheless, further research is needed to optimize ddPCR as a technique for the quantification of the bacteria number in the biofilm layer.

Availability of data and materials

Corresponding author could provide the all experimental data on valid request.

References

  1. Al-Ghazali MR, Al-Azawi SK (1986) Detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in a sewage treatment plant in Iraq. J Appl Bacteriol 60:251–254

  2. Al-Ghazali MR, Al-Azawi SK (1988) Effects of sewage treatment on the removal of Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Bacteriol 65(3):203–208

  3. Barbosa J, Borges S, Camilo R, Magalhães R, Ferreira V, Santos I, Silva J, Almeida G, Teixeira P (2013) Biofilm formation among clinical and food isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Microbiol 2013:524975. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/524975

  4. Bian X, Jing F, Li G, Fan X, Jia C, Zhou H, Jin Q, Zhao J (2015) A microfluidic droplet digital PCR for simultaneous detection of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 and Listeria monocytogenes. Biosens Bioelectron 74:770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.016

  5. Bonsaglia ECR, Silva NCC, Fernades Júnior A, Araújo Júnior JP, Tsunemi MH, Rall VLM (2014) Production of biofilm by Listeria monocytogenes in different materials and temperatures. Food Control 35(1):386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.07.023

  6. Camejo A, Carvalho F, Reis O, Leitão E, Sousa S, Cabanes D (2011) The arsenal of virulence factors deployed by Listeria monocytogenes to promote its cell infection cycle. Virulence 2(5):379–394. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.5.17703

  7. Chae MS, Schraft H (2000) Comparative evaluation of adhesion and biofilm formation of different Listeria monocytogenes strains. Int J Food Microbiol 62:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00406-2

  8. Chavant P, Martinie B, Meylheuc T, Bellon-Fontaine MN, Hebraud M (2002) Listeria monocytogenes LO28: surface physicochemical properties and ability to form biofilms at different temperatures and growth phases. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(2):728–737. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.2.728-737.2002

  9. Chen J, Luo Z, Li L, He J, Li L, Zhu J, Wu P, He L (2018) Capillary-based integrated digital PCR in picoliter droplets. Lab Chip 18(3):412–421. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc01160a

  10. Cooley MB, Carychao D, Gorski L (2018) Optimized co-extraction and quantification of DNA from enteric pathogens in surface water samples near produce fields in California. Front Microbiol 9:448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00448

  11. Cremonesi P, Cortimiglia C, Picozzi C, Minozzi G, Malvisi M, Luini M, Castiglioni B (2016) Development of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for rapid and simultaneous identification of common foodborne pathogens in soft cheese. Front Microbiol 7:1725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01725

  12. de Oliveira MM, Florisvaldo Brugnera D, Alves E, Hilsdorf Piccoli R (2010) Biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on stainless steel surface and biotransfer potential. Brown J Microbiol. 41(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220100001000016

  13. Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Paludi D, D’Orio V, Vergara A, Conter M, Ianieri A (2008) Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J Appl Microbiol 104(6):1552–1561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03688.x

  14. Doijad SP, Barbuddhe SB, Garg S, Poharkar KV, Kalorey DR, Kurkure NV, Rawool DB, Chakraborty T (2015) Biofilm-forming abilities of Listeria monocytogenes serotypes isolated from different sources. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137046

  15. European Food Safety Authority (2018) The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J 16(12):5500. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500

  16. Fagerlund A, Møretrø T, Heir E, Briandet R, Langsrud S (2017) Cleaning and disinfection of biofilms composed of Listeria monocytogenes and background microbiota from meat processing surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 83(17):e01046-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01046-17

  17. Gamble R, Muriana PM (2007) Microplate fluorescence assay for measurement of the ability of strains of Listeria monocytogenes from meat and meat-processing plants to adhere to abiotic surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5235–5244. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00114-07

  18. Gandra TKV, Volcana D, Kroning IS, Marinib N, de Oliveirac AC, Bastosd CP, da Silva WP (2019) Expression levels of the agr locus and prfA gene during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on stainless steel and polystyrene during 8 to 48 h of incubation 10 to 37 °C. Int J Food Microbiol 300:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.03.021

  19. Gerdes L, Iwobi A, Busch U, Pecoraro S (2016) Optimization of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction for quantification of genetically modified organisms. Biomol Detect Quantif 7:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2015.12003

  20. Guilbaud M, de Coppet P, Bourion F, Rachman C, Prévost H, Dousset X (2005) Quantitative detection of Listeria monocytogenes in biofilms by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(4):2190–2194. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.4.2190-2194.2005

  21. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz AJ, Bright IJ, Lucero MY, Hiddessen AL, Legler TC, Kitano TK, Hodelv MR, Petersen JF, Wyatt PW, Steenblock ER, Shah PH, Bousse LJ, Troup CB, Mellen JC, Wittmann DK, Erndt NG, Cauley TH, Koehler RT, So AP, Dube S, Rose KA, Montesclaros L, Wang S, Stumbo DP, Hodges SP, Romine S, Milanovich FP, White HE, Regan JF, Karlin-Neumann GA, Hindson CM, Saxonov S, Colston BW (2011) High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of dna copy number. Anal Chem 83(22):8604–8610. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202028g

  22. Kadam SR, den Besten HMW, van der Veen S, Zwietering MH, Moezelaar R, Abee T (2013) Diversity assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation: impact of growth condition, serotype and strain origin. Int J Food Microbiol 165(3):259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.025

  23. Kim TG, Jeong SY, Cho KS (2014) Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6105–6113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5794-4

  24. Kiselinova M, Pasternak AO, De Spiegelaere W, Vogelaers D, Berkhout B, Vandekerckhove L (2014) Comparison of droplet digital PCR and seminested realtime PCR for quantification of cell-associated HIV-1 RNA. PLoS ONE 9(1):e85999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085999

  25. Klančnik A, Toplak N, Kovač M, Marquis H, Jeršek B (2015) Quantification of Listeria monocytogenes cells with digital PCR and their biofilm cells with real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 118:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.012

  26. Klein MI, Scott-Anne KM, Gregoire S, Rosalen PL, Koo H (2012) Molecular approaches for viable bacterial population and transcriptional analyzes in a rodent model of dental caries. Mol Oral Microbiol 27:350–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00647.x

  27. Koppel R, Bucher T, Frei A, Waiblinger HU (2015) Droplet digital PCR versus multiplex real-time PCR method for the detection and quantification of DNA from the four transgenic soy traits MON87769, MON87708, MON87705 and FG72, and lectin. Eur Food Res Technol 241:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2481-3

  28. Law JW, Ab Mutalib NS, Chan KG, Lee LH (2015) Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Front Microbiol 5:770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770

  29. Li L, Mendis N, Trigui H, Oliver JD, Faucher SP (2014) The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 5:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258

  30. Mortari A, Lorenzelli L (2014) Recent sensing technologies for pathogen detection in milk: a review. Biosens Bioelectron 60:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.03.063

  31. Pan Y, Breidt F Jr, Kathariou S (2006) Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms to sanitizing agents in a simulated food processing environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7711–7777. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01065-06

  32. Pinheiro LB, Coleman VA, Hindson CM, Herrmann J, Hindson BJ, Bhat S, Emslie KR (2012) Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification. Anal Chem 84(2):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202578x

  33. Porcellato D, Narvhus J, Skeie SB (2016) Detection and quantification of Bacillus cereus group in milk by droplet digital PCR. J Microbiol Methods 127:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.012

  34. PulseNet (2013) Standard operating procedure for PulseNet PFGE of Listeria monocytogenes (PNL04)

  35. Quan P-L, Sauzade M, Brouzes E (2018) dPCR: a technology review. Sensors 18(4):1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041271

  36. Quigley L, O’Sullivan O, Beresford TP, Ross R, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD (2012) A comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese. J Appl Microbiol 113(1):96–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05294.x

  37. Ricchi M, Bertasio C, Boniotti MB, Vicari N, Russo S, Tilola M, Bellotti MA, Bertasi B (2017) Comparison among the quantification of bacterial pathogens by qPCR, dPCR, and cultural methods. Front Microbiol 8:1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01174

  38. Rossmanith P, Wagner M (2011) The challenge to quantify Listeria monocytogenes—a model leading to new aspects in molecular biological food pathogen detection. J Appl Microbiol 110:605–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04915.x

  39. Rothrock MJ, Hiett KL, Kiepper BH, Ingram K, Hinton A (2013) Quantification of zoonotic bacterial pathogens within commercial poultry processing water samples using droplet digital PCR. Adv Microbiol 3:403–411. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2013.35055

  40. Sanders R, Huggett JF, Bushell CA, Cowen S, Scott DJ, Foy CA (2011) Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification. Anal Chem 83(17):6474–6484. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac103230c

  41. Schuppler M, Loessner MJ (2010) The opportunistic pathogen Listeria monocytogenes: pathogenicity and interaction with the mucosal immune system. Int J Inflam 2010:704321. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/704321

  42. Skowron K, Wiktorczyk N, Grudlewska K, Kwiecińska-Piróg J, Wałecka-Zacharska E, Paluszak Z, Gospodarek-Komkowska E (2019) Drug-susceptibility, biofilm-forming ability and biofilm survival on stainless steel of Listeria spp. strains isolated from cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 296:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.021

  43. Suo B, He Y, Tu SI, Shi X (2010) A multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous detection of Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157, and Listeria monocytogenes in meat products. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7(6):619–628. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2009.0430

  44. Taylor SC, Laperriere G, Germain H (2017) Droplet digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data. Sci Rep 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02217-x

  45. Traunšek U, Toplak N, Jeršek B, Lapanje A, Majstorović T, Kovač M (2011) Novel costefficient real-time PCR assays for detection and quantitation of Listeria monocytogenes. J Microbiol Methods 85:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2011.01.018

  46. Wałecka E, Molenda J, Bania J (2009) The impact of environmental stress on Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Pol J Vet Sci 12(4):575–579

  47. Whale AS, Huggett JF, Cowen S, Speirs V, Shaw J, Ellison S, Foy CA, Scott DJ (2012) Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40(11):e82. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks203

  48. Witte AK, Fister S, Mester P, Schoder D, Rossmanith P (2016a) Evaluation of the performance of quantitative detection of the Listeria monocytogenes prfA locus with droplet digital PCR. Anal Bioanal Chem 408(27):7583–7593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9861-9

  49. Witte AK, Mester P, Fister S, Witte M, Schoder D, Rossmanith P (2016b) A systematic investigation of parameters influencing droplet rain in the Listeria monocytogenes prfA assay-reduction of ambiguous results in ddPCR. PLoS ONE 11(12):e0168179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168179

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Nicolaus Copernicus University with funds from the maintenance of the research potential of the Department of Microbiology (PDB WF 536).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KGB, KS: carried out the experiments; KGB, KS: wrote the manuscript; KS, EGK: edited the manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grudlewska-Buda, K., Skowron, K. & Gospodarek-Komkowska, E. Comparison of the intensity of biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes using classical culture-based method and digital droplet PCR. AMB Expr 10, 75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01007-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Listeria monocytogenes
  • Droplet digital PCR
  • Quantification
  • hlyA
  • Biofilm
  • Abiotic surfaces