Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Microbial diversity of saline environments: searching for cytotoxic activities

  • Carolina Díaz-Cárdenas1,
  • Angela Cantillo2,
  • Laura Yinneth Rojas3,
  • Tito Sandoval3,
  • Susana Fiorentino3,
  • Jorge Robles4,
  • Freddy A. Ramos5,
  • María Mercedes Zambrano2 and
  • Sandra Baena1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
AMB Express20177:223

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0527-6

Received: 1 November 2017

Accepted: 13 December 2017

Published: 22 December 2017

The Correction to this article has been published in AMB Express 2018 8:35

Abstract

In order to select halophilic microorganisms as a source of compounds with cytotoxic activities, a total of 135 bacterial strains were isolated from water and sediment samples collected from the Zipaquirá salt mine in the Colombian Andes. We determined the cytotoxic effects of 100 crude extracts from 54 selected organisms on the adherent murine mammary cell carcinoma 4T1 and human mammary adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell lines. These extracts were obtained from strains of Isoptericola, Ornithinimicrobium, Janibacter, Nesterenkonia, Alkalibacterium, Bacillus, Halomonas, Chromohalobacter, Shewanella, Salipiger, Martellela, Oceanibaculum, Caenispirillum and Labrenzia. The extracts of 23 strains showed an IC50 of less than 100 μg mL−1. They were subsequently analyzed by LC/MS allowing dereplication of 20 compounds. The cytotoxic effect was related to a complex mixture of diketopiperazines present in many of the extracts analyzed. The greatest cytotoxic activity against both of the evaluated cell lines was obtained from the chloroform extract of Labrenzia aggregata USBA 371 which had an IC50 < 6 μg mL−1. Other extracts with high levels of cytotoxic activity were obtained from Bacillus sp. (IC50 < 50 μg mL−1) which contained several compounds such as macrolactin L and A, 7-O-succinoylmacrolactin F and iturin. Shewanella chilikensis USBA 344 also showed high levels of cytotoxic activity against both cell lines in the crude extract: an IC50 < 15 μg mL−1 against the 4T1 cell line and an IC50 < 68 μg mL−1 against the MCF-7 cell line. Nesterenkonia sandarakina CG 35, which has an IC50 of 118 µg mL−1 against 4T1, is a producer of diketopiperazines and 1-acetyl-β-carboline. Also, Ornithinimicrobium kibberense CG 24, which has IC50 < 50 μg mL−1, was a producer of diketopiperazines and lagunamycin. Our study demonstrates that these saline environments are habitats of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria that have previously unreported cytotoxic activity.

Keywords

Phylogenetic diversityHalophilic bacteriaCytotoxic activitySecondary metabolism

Introduction

Saline environments are usually defined as those containing salt concentrations similar to seawater (~ 3.5% (w/v) total dissolved salts) whereas hypersaline environments contain higher salt concentrations and these environments are largely used for the study of the microbial diversity and ecology (Ventosa et al. 2014). Halophiles have attracted the interests of researchers because of their adaptability to a wide range of salinities as well as their potentially promising applications. They are sources of compatible solutes, stable enzymes (DNAses, lipases, amylases and proteases), bacteriorhodopsin, polymers, β-carotene and other organic substances of interest (Chen et al. 2010; Oren 2010; Braña et al. 2015; da Silva et al. 2015).

These microorganisms have been also considered as a potential source of bioactive compounds. Several antitumor and antimicrobial substances have already been isolated from moderately and extremely halophilic microorganisms including archaeal proteinaceous antimicrobials (i.e. halocins) that have been isolated from several extremely halophilic archaea such as Natrinema sp. (Karthikeyan et al. 2013) and Haloferax mediterranei (O’Connor and Shand 2002). Other examples are pigments such as prodigiosin isolated from Vibrio spp., that exhibit antimicrobial activity (Gallardo et al. 2016). Lipopeptides, polyketides, terpenes, macrolactins from diverse microorganisms such as Saccharothrix sp., Nocardiopsis sp., and Bacillus spp. (Gan et al. 2015; Son et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2017) and diketopiperazines (DKPs) from Streptomyces spp., Bacillus spp. and Nocardiopsis spp. (Raju et al. 2009; Fu et al. 2011; Yonezawa et al. 2011; Gu et al. 2013). Thus, the saline environments could be largely underexplored ecological niches for the discovery of bioactive metabolites and these halophilic microorganisms are potential sources for a broad range of new therapeutic compounds (Demain 2014). The current estimate that 90% of the biosynthetic capacity of microorganisms is yet to be discovered highlights the importance of research in microbial diversity and in the discovery of bioactive principles as keys to unlocking the metabolic potential of microbes (Walsh and Fischbach 2010).

The aim of this study was to generate information on the cytotoxic potential of extracts and compounds produced by halophilic and halotolerant organisms isolated from unexplored Colombian rock salt and saline spring environments. Thus, in this study, halophilic microorganisms were isolated from hypersaline environments at the Zipaquirá salt mine, located in the eastern Andean Mountain range. They were then analyzed for their capacities to produce cytotoxic compounds under several salt concentrations.

Materials and methods

Zipaquirá salt mine: site description and sampling

Samples of water, sediment, brine and solid (rock salt) were collected in 500 mL sterile glass and plastic bottles from six sampling points during three sampling events at the Zipaquirá salt mine in Colombia (5°01′06.18″N and 74°0′13.63″W) at 2656 m.a.s.l. The samples were used to inoculate basal salt medium, to which several carbon sources were added. The samples were carefully stored at 4 °C and transported to the laboratories prior to analysis. The samples were used for enrichment on the following day.

For physical–chemical analysis, 5 L of water from each sampling point were collected. The temperature and pH analyses were performed in situ using a Hach pH meter. The analysis of calcium (Ca2+ mg L−1), total organic carbon (mg L−1), chlorides (Cl mg L−1), total phosphorous (PO43− mg L−1), total iron (Fe mg L−1), magnesium (Mg2+ mg L−1), manganese (Mn2+ mg L−1), nitrates (N-NO3 mg L−1), ammoniacal nitrogen (N-NH4 mg L−1), potassium (K+ mg L−1), salinity (conductivity mS cm−1), sodium (Na+ mg L−1), sulfate (SO42− mg L−1) and sulfites (SO32− mg L−1) was performed using standard methods (APHA/AWWA/WEF 2012).

Strains

Both halophilic microorganisms isolated from Zipaquirá salt mine and other previously isolated strains were used for screening in this study. These previously isolated strains were obtained in a previous study from two saline springs in the Central Mountain Range of the Colombian Andes and are part of our collection of microorganisms (Díaz-Cárdenas and Baena 2015): Oceanibaculum indicum USBA 36, Caenispirillum bisanense USBA 85, Shewanella chilikensis USBA 344 and Labrenzia aggregata USBA 371. All of the strains evaluated for the cytotoxic screenings were deposited in the Colección de microorganismos de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (WDCM857).

Isolation and enrichment of halophilic microorganisms

In order to isolate halophilic microorganisms the following media were used. (1) Actinomycete isolation agar (per liter of distilled water): 4% (w/v) NaCl, 2.0 g of sodium caseinate, 0.1 g of asparagine, 4.0 g of sodium propionate, 0.5 g of K2HPO4, 0.1 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 g of FeSO4, 5.0 g of glycerol and 15 g of agar (Sigma). (2) Halophilic medium (HM) (per liter of distilled water): 10  or 4% (w/v) NaCl, 2.0 g of KCl, 1.0 g of MgSO4, 0.36 g of CaCl 2  .  2H2O, 0.23 g of NaBr, 0.06 g of NaHCO3, trace FeCl3, 10.0 g of yeast extract (Difco), 5.0 g of peptone (Difco) and 1.0 g of glucose (pH 7.5) (Ventosa Ucero et al. 1982). (3) M63 medium (per liter of distilled water): 13.6 g of KH2PO4, 2 g of (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 g of FeSO4·7H2O, 0.24 g of MgSO4·7H2O and 4 g of glucose (Takashina et al. 1994). (4) Water from the sampling points filtered through 47 mm diameter filters with a pore size of 0.45 μm (GTTP, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then sterilized at 121 °C and 15 psi for 30 min. This water was supplemented with 1 ml L−1 of the oligoelement solution SL10 (Widdel et al. 1983) and either 0.1% (w/v) casamino acids, 10 mM glycerol or 4 mM acetic acid as the carbon source. The culture medium pH was adjusted to 6.0–7.0 with 10% NaOH (w/v) (Merck), to take into account the in situ pH at the sampling points. Enrichments were performed by inoculating 1 mL of sample from each of the six sampling points into tubes containing 5 mL of culture media and then incubating the tubes at room temperature (22 °C ± 3) in the dark and without agitation until growth was observed. Microbial growth was inspected daily for 2 weeks by light microscopy using a Nikon phase contrast microscope (Nikon i50 Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). After confirmation of growth, tenfold serial dilutions were prepared and inoculated into tubes with 5 mL of culture medium, and the last positive serial dilution was used to inoculate plates containing enrichment medium fortified with 2% (w/v) agar (Sigma). The tubes were incubated under the same conditions described above. Cells with different morphologies and appearances were transferred to new culture plates to obtain pure cultures. The isolates were purified by repeated growth on solid media and preserved with 20% (v/v) glycerol at − 80 °C.

Solid samples (salt rock) were first surface-sterilized by immersing 200 g of the sample in ethanol followed by flaming. Each 200 g sample was then introduced into a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask with 100 mL of liquid medium supplemented with various NaCl concentrations (5, 8, 10 and 20% w/v) and then incubated in the dark without stirring for 10 days at room temperature. Serial dilutions of these 10 day cultures were then plated onto TSA (Merck) and HM halophilic medium supplemented with 5 or 8% (w/v) NaCl; 10 day cultures in 10 and 20% (w/v) NaCl were plated directly onto solid media (100 µL). After 5 days of incubation at room temperature in the dark, colonies with morphological and pigment differences were selected, and successive passages were conducted until pure strains were obtained.

The isolated strains were grown in TSB (Merck), marine broth (Difco) or modified marine broth (Difco) supplemented with either 0.1% (w/v) casamino acids or 5 mM glucose, and 3, 5 or 8% (w/v) NaCl to adjust the salinity.

Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and phylogenetic reconstruction

DNA was extracted using the Wizard® Genomic DNA kit (Promega cat #A1120) from 10 mL of an exponentially growing microbial culture at 8000×g for 10 min or purified from colonies resuspended in 10 mM Tris–HCl and 0.7% SDS (Cayol et al. 1995). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3´) (Lane 1991) for bacteria and 344F (5′-ACKGCTCAGTAACACGT-3′) (Raskin et al. 1994) and 915R (5′-GTGCTCCCCCGCCAATTCCT-3′) (Stahl and Amann 1991) for archaea. All PCRs (in a 50-µL total volume reaction) contained < 0.5 µg of DNA template, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1X Buffer and 1.25 U of GoTaq® DNA Polymerase (Promega). The PCR conditions were 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final elongation step of 10 min at 72 °C. Sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 3500 (Laboratorio de secuenciación de ADN, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia) and an ABI PRISM® 3730XL Analyzer (Macrogen Inc., South Korea). Raw sequence data were imported into BioEdit, version 7.2.5, sequence editor (Hall 1999) and corrected manually for errors. Sequences were compared against sequences of type strains using RDP release 11 (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the novel and previously isolated strains were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MF197926–MF197981, MF506732–MF506815.

Cytotoxic activity screening assays

Cultures were started with a saturated (24–120 h) culture, diluted to 105 CFU and inoculated 1:100 into fresh medium, and cultured under the conditions described in Additional file 1: Table S1. The culture media used were marine broth (Difco), modified marine broth with 1% (w/v) casamino acids, 5 mM glucose, TSB (Merck) and TSB supplemented with 3% (w/v), 4% (w/v), 5% (w/v) or 8% (w/v) NaCl. All cultures were grown in duplicate.

Preparation of crude extracts

Microbial cultures were centrifuged at 9000×g at 4 °C for 20 min, and cell-free supernatants were sequentially extracted three times with chloroform and ethyl acetate at a 1:1 ratio. The extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure using a Buchi Rotavapor R114 (Buchi, Switzerland) and then stored at − 20 °C in amber glass vials prior to use. Uninoculated culture medium was processed as a negative control. The chloroform extracts were resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and the ethyl acetate extracts were resuspended in ethanol at final concentrations of 25 mg mL−1 (stock solution). Subsequently, the samples were diluted (from 250 to 31 μg mL−1) for evaluation of cytotoxic activity.

Cytotoxic activity screening

The cytotoxic activity of the extracts was determined using the neutral red technique (Repetto et al. 2008). Briefly, the adherent 4T1 (mouse mammary tumor) and MCF-7 (human mammary adenocarcinoma) cell lines were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in 96-well plates at a density of 3 × 103 cells well−1. The plates were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 to allow monolayer formation. Selection of promising strains was performed using four dilutions ranging from 250 to 31.25 μg mL−1. The solvent used in the reconstitution of the extract (ethanol or DMSO) was evaluated as a negative control for each test in the same volume as the extracts. Doxorubicin at a maximum concentration of 5 μM was used as a positive control. In addition, untreated cell controls, cell-free treatments and a culture medium control were included for each extract. These analyses were performed in duplicate.

After 48 h of treatment, two washes were performed with 1X PBS, the neutral red reagent was added to each well and the plates were incubated for 3 h. After incubation, two washes were performed with PBS. Finally, a bleach solution (1% (v/v) glacial acetic acid, 50% (v/v) ethanol and 49% (v/v) distilled water) was added to each well and stirred for 20 min before the absorbance was read at 540 nm (Multiskan™ FC microplate photometer) (Repetto et al. 2008).

Inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) values were defined as the concentration of the extracts that generated 50% inhibition of tumor cell growth. To calculate the IC50, the same procedure described for the initial screening was performed using eight decreasing concentrations starting at 250 μg mL−1. The positive and negative controls were the same as those used for the initial screening. The calculation was performed using a non-linear regression method of Log (concentration) vs. percentage inhibition using algorithms with three or four parameters according to the behavior of the treatment. These analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0.

Fractionation and metabolomics evaluation

Crude extracts with cytotoxic activity (100 mg) were fractionated using cartridges (Hypersep DIOL—Thermo Scientific) and solvents with increasing polarity, starting with hexane and ending with methanol. Twelve fractions were obtained as follows: F1.1 and F 1.2. (100% hexane), F2.1 and F2.2 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 8:2), F3.1 and F3.2 (hexane/ethyl acetate 1:1), F4.1 and F4.2 (100% ethyl acetate), F5.1 and F5.2 (ethyl acetate/methanol, 1:1) and F6.1 and F6.2 (100% methanol). The fractions were evaporated at room temperature and stored at − 20 °C in amber glass vials prior to use.

LC/MS analysis of active extracts and fractions

Selected samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) at Fundación MEDINA in Spain as described by (González-Menéndez et al. 2016). The LC analysis was performed on an Agilent 1200 Rapid Resolution HPLC interfaced to a Bruker maXis mass spectrometer. The volume of sample injected was 2 µL. A Zorbax SB-C8 column (2.1 × 30 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) was used for separation during which the column was maintained at 40 °C with a flow rate of 300 μL min−1. Two solvents were used as the mobile phase. Solvent A consisted of 10% acetonitrile and 90% water and solvent B consisted of 90% acetonitrile and 10% water. Both had 13 mM ammonium formate and 0.01% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid. The gradient started at 10% B rose to 100% B in 6 min, was maintained at 100% B for 2 min and returned to 10% B for 2 min to initialize the system. Full diode array UV scans from 100 to 900 nm were collected in 4-nm steps at 0.25 s scan−1. Mass spectrometry acquisition to generate raw data was performed on an Agilent MSD 1100 mass spectrometer. Ionization was achieved by electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive mode. The instrumental parameters were: 4 kV capillary voltage, drying gas flow of 11 L min−1 at 200 °C and nebulizer pressure at 2.8 bars. TFA-Na cluster ions were used for mass calibration of the instrument prior to sample injection. Each sample run was recalibrated by infusion with the same TFA-NA calibrant before the chromatographic front. Database matching was performed using an in-house developed application within which the UV signal, retention time, mass signal and molecular formula of the selected ions were compared to the UV-HPLC-HRMS data of known metabolites stored in the Fundación MEDINA database (High Resolution MS 647 of Actinobacteria, 384 of Fungi and 42 of Plants) and matching molecular formulas in the Chapman and Hall Dictionary of Natural Products database (290,000 entries of natural products) (Running 1993).

Results

Isolation of halophilic microorganisms from Zipaquirá salt mine and phylogenic diversity of isolated bacteria

In order to isolate halophilic microorganisms, we collected water, sediment, brine and solid (rock salt) samples from six sites in a salt mine in Zipaquirá, Colombia. This environment developed as a salt dome around 250 million years ago and then was raised above sea level during the late Tertiary period when the Andes Mountains were formed (de Cardale-Schrimpff 1978). The sampling sites had varying temperatures (14–20 °C) and pH (5.5–6.5) and exhibited high chloride, sodium, calcium, sulfate and potassium levels (Additional file 1: Table S2). The recovered strains (135) were isolated from these hypersaline environments using several culture media and salinity conditions as described in the methodology section. Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA (800–1400 bp) gene showed that most strains belonged to the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla, and only four Archaean strains were obtained, belonging to the genera Haloferax in phylum Euryarchaeota (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Distribution of the relative abundance of the Bacteria and Archaea strains isolated at Zipaquirá salt mine

The most abundant phylum was Firmicutes, represented by the Bacillaceae, Carnobacillaceae, Planococcaceae and Staphylococcaceae families. Bacillus was the most abundant genus (55 isolates), followed by Salimicrobium (4 isolates) and Marinococcus (3 isolates). The Proteobacteria phylum was represented by Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria classes, which are commonly found in halophilic environments (Chen et al. 2010). Within Gammaproteobacteria we isolated organisms from the Oceanospirillales order, in which the Halomonadaceae family was the most abundant, with a predominance of Chromohalobacter (26 isolates) and Halomonas genera (16 isolates). The Alteromonadales (Idiomarinaceae and Alteromonadaceae families) and Salinisphaerales orders (Salinisphaeraceae family) were also found. Within the Alphaproteobacteria, the organisms were distributed between Rhodobacterales (Rhodobacteraceae family) and Rhizobiales (Aurantimonadaceae family). Actinobacteria were represented by microorganisms of Janibacter, Isoptericola, Nesterenkonia, Ornithinimicrobium and Marmoricola genera. Bacteroidetes was represented by Salegentibacter genus (Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Distribution of the relative abundance of the bacteria genera isolated at Zipaquirá salt mine

Cytotoxic activity of halophilic isolates

Cytotoxic activity of crude extracts

Cytotoxic activity was analyzed for 46 strains randomly selected, looking for including representatives of all genera from the samples collected at Zipaquirá and for 4 strains previously isolated from other saline environments. Ninety-five crude extracts were obtained, 50 of these by partition with chloroform, and 45 by partition with ethyl acetate. Seventeen extracts were not evaluated for their cytotoxic activity because of the yield of the recovered extract (less than 1 mg).

Six Actinobacteria strains were evaluated, Janibacter cremeus CG 12, Isoptericola spp. CG 20 and CG 23, Ornithinimicrobium kibberense CG 24, CG 28 and Nesterenkonia sandarakina CG 35. Strains CG 23, CG 24, and CG 12 showed high levels of cytotoxic activity (IC50 < 60 μg mL−1) against the MCF-7 cell line under at least one of the growth conditions evaluated. In contrast, levels of activity against the 4T1 cell line were low (IC50 ~ 110 μg mL−1) and were only detected in chloroform extracts from the CG 24 and CG 35 strains. Interestingly, the biological activity of strains of the same species was found to vary. For instance, CG 28 and CG 35 strains, which were both identified as Nesterenkonia sandarakina, showed variation in activity when grown under the same experimental conditions (Table 1), suggesting that they are not redundant isolates.
Table 1

Cytotoxic activities of evaluated strains

Strain ID

Closed type strain (Accession No) (% similarity)

Culture medium

Extraction solvent

Cytotoxic activity of crude extracts IC50 (µg mL−1)

Cellular line

4T1

MCF7

Actinobacteria

 CG 23

Isoptericola halotolerans (KR476431.1) (98)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

> 250

146.0

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

53.9

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

 CG 24

Ornithinimicrobium kibberense (KM406766.1) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

106.0

> 250

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

57.2

 CG 12

Janibacter cremeus (KY775504.1) (94)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

226

34.2

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 CG 35

Nesterenkonia sandarakina (KF924226) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

117.8

188.6

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 CG 28

Nesterenkonia sandarakina (KF924226) (98)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 20

Isoptericola halotolerans (KP972642.1) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

TSB

Chloroform

Firmicutes

 CG 6

Alkalibacterium putridalgicola (AB681988.1) (99)

Marine broth

Chloroform

134.3

59.9

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

118.8

 CG 3

Bacillus aquimaris (KC335217.1) (99)

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

87.3

 USBA 882

Bacillus aquimaris (NR_025241.1) (96)

Modified marine broth

Ethyl acetate

192.0

NT

 USBA 899

Bacillus hemicentroti (NR_025264.1) (97)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 13

Bacillus aquimaris (KC335217.1) (92)

TSB 80

Chloroform

TSB 80

Ethyl acetate

> 250

200.5

 CG 25

Bacillus hwajinpoensis (KR045741.1) (97)

TSB 80

Chloroform

TSB 80

Ethyl acetate

> 250

56.1

 CG 36

Bacillus aerophilus (KR010180.1) (99)

TSB

Chloroform

173.2

8.8

 CG 42

Bacillus hwajinpoensis (KX817927.1) (99)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB

Chloroform

 CG 69

Bacillus aerophilus (KU236478.1) (99)

TSB

Chloroform

> 250

224.0

 CG 11

Bacillus altitudinis (NR_118439.1) (99)

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 CG 7

Bacillus aquimaris (NR_113995.1) (95)

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 CG 69

Bacillus aerophilus (KU236478.1) (99)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 15

Bacillus licheniformis (S002290488) (98)

TSB

Chloroform

> 250

136

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

42.0

Marine broth

Chloroform

Marine broth

Ethyl acetate

> 250

65.6

 USBA 866

Bacillus vietnamensis (NR_025264.1) (97)

Modified marine broth

Chloroform

> 250

185.7

Modified marine broth

Ethyl acetate

48.3

65.7

 USBA 867

Bacillus simplex (NR_109010.1) (98)

Modified marine broth

Ethyl acetate

> 250

134.8

 USBA 868

Bacillus hemicentroti (NR_114919.1) (99)

Modified marine broth

Ethyl acetate

56.2

76.2

 CG 22

Bacillus subtilis (CP021499.1) (100)

TSB

Chloroform

29.8

76.5

TSB

Ethyl acetate

21.7

75.5

 CG 63

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (KY784657.1) (99)

TSB 80

Chloroform

107

76.4

 CG 31

Bacillus weihenstephanensis (HF678914.2) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

25.4

144.4

 CG 57

Bacillus weihenstephanensis (KY120752.1) (100)

TSB

Chloroform

TSB

Ethyl acetate

 CG 74

Salimicrobium flavidum (EU868860.1) (96)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 86

Salimicrobium flavidum (EU868860.1) (96)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 88

Salimicrobium flavidum (EU868860.1) (97)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

Gammaproteobacteria

 CG 76

Halomonas alkaliantarctica (NR_145910.1) (91)

TSB 4% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

96.7

 CG X

Halomonas alkaliantarctica (NR_145910.1) (91)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

82.3

101.3

 CG 60

Halomonas ventosae (NR_044519.1) (93)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 CG 83

Halomonas ventosae (NR_044519.1) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 USBA 856

Halomonas ventosae (NR_042812.1) (99)

Modified marine broth

Chloroform

4.3

217.1

Modified marine broth

Ethyl acetate

TSB

Ethyl acetate

 CG 78

Halomonas janggokensis (AB042501.2) (92)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 66

Halomonas fontilapidosi (KT984005.1) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 USBA 873

Halomonas taeanensis (NR_043087.1) (96)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 50

Chromohalobacter japonicus (NR_040965) (97)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

158.6

115

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 72

Chromohalobacter japonicus (NR_040965) (99)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 CG 55

Chromohalobacter canadensis (NR_114545.1) (98)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

69.3

137.6

 USBA862

Chromohalobacter japonicus (NR_114545.1) (96)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 USBA 861

Chromohalobacter japonicus (NR_114545.1) (95)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 USBA 896

Chromohalobacter canadensis (NR_114545.1) (96)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

 USBA 344

Shawanella chilikensis (BALO01000089) (99)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

5.3

67.9

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

15.3

21.8

 CG 65

Marinobacter persicus (NR_109110.1) (98)

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

TSB 8% (w/v) NaCl

Ethyl acetate

Alphaproteobacteria

 CG 82

Salipiger nanhaiensis (NR_134804.1) (98)

TSB

Ethyl acetate

> 250

> 250

 USBA 36

Oceanibaculum indicum (NR_044547.1) (99)

TSB 5% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

173.2

8.8

 USBA 85

Caenispirillum bisanense (NR_04408.1) (98)

TSB

Chloroform

69.6

90.5

TSB

Ethyl acetate

29.5

74.1

 USBA 857

Martelella mediterránea (NR_043068.1) (98)

Marine broth

Chloroform

> 250

> 250

 USBA 371

Labrenzia aggregata (NR_11386.1) (99)

TSB 3% (w/v) NaCl

Chloroform

5.5

4.5

Ten out of the 42 extracts obtained from 23 Firmicutes strains belonging to Alkalibacterium, Bacillus and Salimicrobium genera were shown to be cytotoxic against the MCF-7 cell line, with IC50 values ranging from 9 to 76 μg mL−1. In addition, five extracts showed cytotoxic activity against the 4T1 cell line, with IC50 values of under 60 μg mL−1. One of the extracts obtained from Bacillus weihenstephanensis strain CG 31 presented selective cytotoxicity against the 4T1 cell line, with an IC50 of 25.4 μg mL−1. No activity was detected in the extracts obtained from the three Salimicrobium strains evaluated (CG 74, 86 and 88). As observed with organisms of Actinobacteria, the results are strain specific and depend on the growth condition (Table 1).

We evaluated strains of the Gamma and Alphaproteobacteria classes. Within Gammaproteobacteria, 31 extracts obtained from 16 Halomonas, Chromohalobacter, Marinobacter and Shewanella strains were analyzed. Shewanella chilikensis strain USBA 344 showed the most cytotoxic activity of any of the extracts obtained in both chloroform and ethyl acetate against both cell lines with an IC50 < 15 μg mL−1 against the 4T1 cell line, and an IC50 < 68 μg mL−1 against the MCF-7 cell line. In addition, high levels of cytotoxic activity were detected in the crude extract recovered in chloroform from Halomonas ventosae strain USBA 856, which presented an IC50 of 4.3 μg mL−1. From the six Chromohalobacter strains, only the extract obtained from Chromohalobacter canadensis CG 55 presented an IC50 < 100 μg mL−1 against the 4T1 cell line (Table 1).

Extracts of three out of the five strains from the Alphaproteobacteria class (Oceanibaculum, Caenispirillum, Labrenzia) showed cytotoxic activity (IC50 < 100 μg mL−1) against one or both cell lines, with the exception of extracts from Martellela mediterranea USBA 857 and Salipiger nanhaiensis CG 82 that were not active. In particular, two extracts stood out as having strong activity. One of these was the chloroform extract of Oceanibaculum indicum strain USBA 36, with an IC50 of 9 μg  mL−1 against the MCF-7 cell line, and the other was the chloroform extract of Labrenzia aggregata strain USBA 371, with IC50 values < 5.5 μg mL−1 against both cell lines (Table 1).

These results indicate that several strains belonging to diverse bacterial phyla of the halophilic strains recovered in this study are interesting sources of cytotoxic extracts whose cytotoxic compounds are also of interest. The results above allowed selection of CG 12, CG 24, CG 22, CG 31, CG 33, CG 35, CG 50, CG 55, CG 63, CG 76, USBA 344, USBA 85 and USBA 371 strains as the most promising sources of cytotoxic compounds. Differences in the cytotoxicity of one strain at different salt concentrations during culturing on the growth media will be explored in further studies. In addition, isolates identified as taxonomically identical showed different IC50 values, suggesting differential production of bioactive metabolites.

LC/MS analysis of active extracts and fractions

A solid-phase extraction (SPE) fractionation and LC/MS analysis strategy was used to identify compounds present in the extracts of the 13 strains selected. SPE was performed using Diol-SPE cartridges and eluting with solvents of increasing polarity as described in the methods section. Cytotoxicity of the fractions obtained was evaluated, and those active fractions were then analyzed by LC/MS (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Table 2

Cytotoxic activities of fractions from the crude extracts

Strain ID

Crude extract/fraction

Extraction solvent

Cytotoxic activity of fractions IC50 (µg mL−1)

Cellular line

4T1

MCF7

CG 35

Crude extract

Chloroform

117.8

188.6

F 2.1

Hexane:ethyl acetate

8:2

73.8

87.9

F 2.2

Hexane:ethyl acetate

8:2

69.6

68.4

F 4.1

Ethyl acetate

88.2

247.2

F 5.2

Ethyl acetate:methanol

9:1

84.5

79.7

F 5.3

Ethyl acetate:methanol

9:1

72.6

96.3

CG 24

Crude extract

Ethyl acetate

> 250

57.2

F 6.2

Methanol

> 250

138.6

CG 22

Crude extract

Chloroform

29.8

76.5

F 6.1

Methanol

> 250

44.8

CG 63

Crude extract

Chloroform

107

76.4

F 4.1

Ethyl acetate

ND

44.4

CG 50

Crude extract

Chloroform

158.6

115

F 6.1

Methanol

31.2

> 250

USBA 344

Crude extract

Ethyl acetate

15

22

F 3.2

Hexane:ethyl acetate

1:1

229.2

80.3

USBA 371

Crude extract

Chloroform

5.5

4.5

F 4.1

Ethyl acetate

15.2

26.6

F 4.2

Ethyl acetate:methanol

9:1

8.9

16.3

F 5.1

Ethyl acetate:methanol

9:1

7.2

14.5

F 6.1

Methanol

28.7

49.0

ND No data

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Cytotoxic effects and IC50 of crude extracts and fraction from strains CG 35 (a), CG 24 (b), CG 22 (c), CG 63 (d), USBA 344 (e), and USBA 371 (f) on the adherent murine mammary cell carcinoma 4T1 and human mammary adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell lines. IC50 was performed using eight dilutions ranging from 250 to 31.25 μg mL−1. DOXO Doxorubicin at concentration of 5 μM was used as a positive control

In some cases, fractionation of the crude extract increased cytotoxic activity against both cell lines. This was the case for the crude extract of Nesterenkonia sandarakina CG 35 obtained with chloroform which had an IC50 of ≥ 118 μg mL−1, while an IC50 of less than 88 μg mL−1 was detected in the non polar F2.1 and F2.2 (hexane/ethyl acetate 8:2) and medium polarity F5.2 (ethyl acetate/ethanol 9:1) fractions (Fig. 3a).

The LC/MS analysis of the crude extract of N. sandarakina CG 35 and dereplication using the Chapman and Hall Dictionary of Natural Products database (Running 1993) and the Fundación Medina data base, allowed identification of 1-acetyl-β-carboline 1, the diketopiperazines (DKPs) cyclo(2-OHPro-Phe) 2, cyclo(Pro-Phe) 3, brevianamide F 4, cyclo(Leu-Phe)5, cyclo(Val-Phe) 6, cyclo(Phe-Phe) 7, cyclo(Leu-Pro) 8 (Fig. 4a), and one compound with m/z 286.1542 not found in the DNP data base. The LC/MS analysis of the F2.2 fraction, which had the highest cytotoxic activity against both cell lines, also showed the presence of 1-acetyl-β-carboline 1. The DKPs detected in the crude extract were again obtained from the more polar fractions (F4.1, F5.1 and F5.2) and the presence of two possible new natural compounds was detected in the F2.2 fraction with m/z of 211.0869 and 552.2438.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Compounds identified by LC/MS from strains CG 35 (a), CG 24 (b), CG 22 (c), CG 63 (d), and CG 50 (e). a 1-acetyl-β-carboline 1, cyclo(2-OHPro-Phe) 2, cyclo(Pro-Phe) 3, brevianamide F 4, cyclo(Leu-Phe) 5, cyclo(Val-Phe) 6, and cyclo(Phe-Phe) 7, cyclo(Pro-Leu) 8; b cyclo(Trp-Tyr), lagunamycin 10; c cyclo(His-Pro) 11; Surfactin 12; d cyclo(Pro-Val) 13, macrolactin 14, succinoylmacrolactin 15, and iturin 16; e cyclo(Pro-Ala) 17, cyclo(Pro-Thr) 18, cyclo(Ala-Phe) 19, cyclo(Pro-Tyr) 20

In other cases, fractionation resulted in decreases in cytotoxic activity. The crude extract obtained from J. cremeus strain CG 12 had an IC50 of 226 μg mL−1 against 4T1 and 34 μg mL−1 against MCF-7, but upon fractionation activity against the MCF-7 cell line was lost, and activity against the 4T1 cell line was reduced. Only slight activity was observed in the non-polar fractions (F2.2 and F3.2) (data not shown). The decreases in the activity could be related to synergistic effects or analytical procedures that should be optimized in order to increase the recovery of the compounds present in the extracts.

For O. kibberense strain CG 24, the IC50 decreased after fractionation from 57 to 185 μg mL−1 against the MCF-7 cell line, the latter in the F6.2 polar fraction (Table 2, Fig. 3b). LC–MS analysis of the crude extract and the F6.2 fraction revealed the presence of the DKPs cyclo(2OHPro-Phe) 2, cyclo(Trp-Tyr) 9 (Fig. 4b), and ions of compounds that did not match the databases here used at m/z 235.1189. The clearest difference was the presence of the compound lagunamycin 10 (Fig. 4b) in the crude extract, which was not detected from the active fraction.

Fractionation of extracts from Bacillus strains (CG 22, CG 63, CG 31 and CG 33) also gave variable results. While the crude extract of strain CG 22 had cytotoxic activity against both cell lines, only the most polar fraction (F6.1) was active against the MCF-7 cell line (IC50 of 45 μg mL−1) (Table 2, Fig. 3c). This fraction contained DKPs cyclo(His-Pro) 11 (Fig. 4c), cyclo(Pro-Phe) 3, as well as ions for analogs of surfactins such as surfactin A1, 4-l-alaninesurfactin C, surfactin B1 and surfactin A 12 (Fig. 4c), and an unidentified compound with m/z = 3416.5966 Da. In the case of strain CG 63, fractionation of the crude extract, which had activity against both cell lines, indicated that only the medium polarity fraction (F4.1) had cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 (IC50 value of 44.4 μg mL−1) (Table 2, Fig. 3d). In this fraction, cyclo(Pro-Phe) 3, cyclo(Pro-Val) 13, and several stereoisomers of macrolactin 14, and succinoylmacrolactin 15, surfactins and iturin 16, were detected (Fig. 4d). Since cytotoxic activity was lost in fractions from the extracts of strains CG 31 and CG 33 (IC50 > 250 μg mL−1), these were not analyzed by LC–MS.

Fractionation of extracts from Chromohalobacter increased their activity in the case of CG 50 for which the most polar fraction (F6.1) showed an IC50 = 31.2 μg mL−1 against the 4T1 cell line (Table 2). LC/MS analysis of this fraction again showed the presence of the DKPs cyclo(Pro-Ala) 17, cyclo(Pro-Thr) 18, cyclo(Ala-Phe) 19, cyclo(Pro-Tyr) 20 (Fig. 4e) and cyclo (Pro-Phe) 3. In contrast, activity strongly decreases upon fractionation of the extract from strain CG 55, so LC–MS analysis was not performed.

After fractionation of the crude extract of H. salicampi CG 76, the cytotoxicity analysis of the recovered fractions showed no activity against the MCF-7 cell line. The initial IC50 in the crude extract was 95 μg mL−1 against this cell line.

Although Shewanella chilikensis strain USBA 344 showed high levels of cytotoxic activity in the crude chloroform (IC50 of 35 μg mL−1 against 4T1 and 68 μg mL−1 against MCF-7) and ethyl acetate extracts (IC50 15 μg mL−1 against 4T1 and 22 μg mL−1 against MCF-7), after fractionation of these extracts, test showed that cytotoxic activity against the 4T1 cell line had been lost. Conversely, we detected activity from the non-polar fraction F3.2, with an IC50 of 80 μg.mL−1 against the MCF-7 cell line (Table 2, Fig. 3e). Analysis of the ethyl acetate extract allowed identification of the presence of cyclo(Pro-Tyr) 9 and cyclo(Pro-His) 11, along with two unidentified compounds.

Fractionation of Labrenzia aggregata USBA 371, which showed the highest levels of cytotoxicity of all the strains evaluated (IC50 < 5.5 μg mL−1), also resulted in fractions with high levels of activity against both cell lines. The medium polarity F4.1, F4.2 and F5.1 fractions presented IC50 values < 16 μg mL−1 against the 4T1 cell line and < 27 μg mL−1 against MCF-7, whereas the polar fraction F6.1 presented IC50 values < 29 μg mL−1 against 4T1 and < 49 μg mL−1 against MCF-7 (Table 2, Fig. 3f). We detected DKPs cyclo(Pro-Phe) 3, cyclo(Leu-Phe) 5, cyclo(Val-Phe) 6, cyclo(Phe-Phe) 7, cyclo(Pro-Leu) 8, cyclo(His-Pro) 11, cyclo(Pro-Val) 13, cyclo(Pro-Ala) 17, and cyclo(Pro-Tyr) 20.

Discussion

Halophilic organisms that have evolved and adapted in oligotrophic marine and other saline environments may produce novel molecules with promising biological activity (Zhang 2005). In this study, we therefore analyzed cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines of halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms isolated from a hypersaline environment. Most of the strains were isolated on halophilic medium and culture media made with saline water from sampling sites and supplemented with several carbon sources. The largest number of isolates were obtained from samples from sampling sites P3 and P5.

Most of these isolates have been previously reported in marine or oceanic environments and other highly saline environments (Claverías et al. 2015; da Silva et al. 2015). Based on the conditions used for recovering these microorganisms, the majority of our isolates are heterotrophic, mesophilic, aerobic or facultative aerobes that are halophilic or halotolerant organisms that can cope with salt concentrations ranging from 0 to 8% NaCl (w/v). Several colonies had yellow, orange, pink and cream pigments, and most were brightened with a creamy texture and were completely round. The exceptions were some Bacillus strains whose colonies were opaque with irregular borders. The growth times of most isolates ranged between 24 and 72 h, with some exceptions of up to 10 days for Actinomycetes.

A total of 43% of the strains isolated belonged to Bacillus. The species of this genus are ubiquitous in various environments and are known for having a large number of biosynthetic gene clusters for the production of secondary metabolites with cytotoxic or antimicrobial activities that promote plant growth or act as biocontrol agents (Ongena and Jacques 2008; Aleti et al. 2015). In this study, we isolated strains of ubiquitous species such as B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and B. licheniformis, and species typically associated with marine habitats such as B. aquimaris, B. baekryungensis and B. hwajinpoensis. All of these marine strains have been reported in marine sponges with bioactive potential due to the presence of structurally unrelated antimicrobial compounds including polyketides, non-ribosomal synthesized peptides and bacteriocins (Phelan et al. 2012). In our study, we detected polyketides with high levels of cytotoxicity such as macrolactin from extracts of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CG 63, and we detected non-ribosomally synthesized lipopeptides like surfactins and iturins from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CG 63 and from Bacillus subtilis CG 22. The cytotoxic activity of macrolactin has been demonstrated previously (Kim et al. 2011; Regmi et al. 2015). Surfactins and iturins are well documented for their antitumor, antifungal, antibacterial, antiviral and insecticidal activities (Vollenbroich et al. 1997; Stein 2005; Kim et al. 2007, 2010; Dey et al. 2015).

Other genera with abundant representatives among our isolates were Chromohalobacter and Halomonas which have been reported to produce metabolites with antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity. In Halomonas, cytotoxic activity with an IC50 > 100 μg mL−1 has been reported in extracts obtained from H. ventosae and H. salina (Chen et al. 2010). Promising cytotoxic activity has also been reported in H. meridiana and H. aquamarina (Sagar et al. 2013). In this study, we detected cytotoxic activity in Halomonas alkaliantarctica strain CG 76, and H. ventosae strain USBA 856. This latter strain has been studied mainly for its ability to produce exopolysaccharides with physical and chemical properties that confer several bioactive functions (Mata et al. 2006). From the six strains of Chromohalobacter evaluated, strains CG 50 and CG 55 showed cytotoxic activity. Sagar et al. (2013) have also reported cytotoxic activity of Chromohalobacter strains against the MCF-7 and HeLa (cervical carcinoma) cell lines in lipophilic extracts obtained with chloroform. In this study, we obtained DKPs consisting mainly of proline in the chloroform extract. Similar results were reported by Bitzer et al. (2006) who detected DKPs with a predominance of this amino acid in lipophilic extracts obtained from Halomonas spp.

The genera Nesterenkonia, Isoptericola, Ornithinimicrobium and Janibacter are included within the rare Actinobacteria group and are less frequently isolated than Streptomyces (Claverías et al. 2015). They are an important focus of new generation pharmaceutical agents (Mahmoud and Kalendar 2016). The compounds detected in all fractions of these “rare” actinomycetes correspond mainly to DKPs. These compounds have also been previously reported in several marine actinomycetes, which have emerged as producers of novel DKPs. These include cyclomarazines (Schultz et al. 2008), naseseazines (Raju et al. 2009), nocazines D and E and methoxyneihumicin (Zhang et al. 2013). In addition to DKPs, we isolated 1-acetyl-β-carboline (Shin et al. 2010) from the F2.2 fraction of Nesterenkonia sp. strain CG 35. This fraction showed cytotoxic activity against both cell lines (< 70 μg mL−1) although, 1-acetyl-β-carboline has not been reported to be a cytotoxic compound. However, it has been shown to have herbicidal, fungicidal and antimicrobial activities, the latter against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA (Elleuch et al. 2010; Shin et al. 2010).

The strain with the highest levels of cytotoxic activity was Labrenzia aggregata USBA 371 which was isolated from the Salado de Consotá salt spring (Díaz-Cárdenas and Baena 2015). Organisms of the Labrenzia genus isolated from marine sponges have presented antimicrobial activity against B. subtilis and MRSA (Graça et al. 2013). However, no previous reports have identified a cytotoxic effect or have shown that this effect is related to the presence of a mixture of DKPs, as shown in this study. On the other hand, dereplication of the LC/MS data allowed identification of several compounds from the database here used as described below. However, many ions showed no coincidence in the database, which indicates the metabolic potential of the extracts analyzed. This potential will be further evaluated within our group.

Compounds isolated were mainly DKPs, although lipopeptides and polyketides were also isolated. The DKPs are produced by the condensation of two amino acids and are common metabolites of bacteria, fungi and sponges. These compounds can act as signal molecules (Tommonaro et al. 2012) and present antifungal (Nishanth Kumar et al. 2012), antibacterial (Fdhila et al. 2003) and antitumor activities (van der Merwe et al. 2008) due to their chiral and functionalized structure which allows them to bind with high affinity to a great variety of receptors. These compounds exhibit a wide range of biological activities (Martins and Carvalho 2007). Even though we have presented the dereplication of 20 compounds, the data obtained demonstrate enormous chemical diversity to be explored. Studies to this end are currently underway in our laboratories. These strains also represent a starting point for the development of biotechnological processes for obtaining these and other compounds for further studies and applications.

Despite the importance of bioactive compounds for the development of novel therapeutic substances, only a small fraction of microorganisms isolated in pure cultures has been evaluated for production of bioactive molecules. Most studies have focused on a few biological groups other than halophilic microorganisms. Although marine environments have been identified as a major source of drug candidates in clinical trials, and a search for sources of new chemical diversity in the oceans is ongoing, this study demonstrates that terrestrial hypersaline environments have great potential for becoming a major source of bioactive molecules. Our study shows a wide diversity of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria in hypersaline environments, indicative of their great adaptive capacities, and demonstrates that they are versatile producers of bioactive compounds. This work will be the basis for the development of future research on the cytotoxic potential of strains of the genera Isoptericola, Ornithinimicrobium, Janibacter, Nesterenkonia, Alkalibacterium, Bacillus, Halomonas, Chromohalobacter, Shewanella, Martelella, Oceanibaculum, Caenispirillum, and Labrenzia. Compounds identified by LC/MS analysis and dereplication were mainly diketopiperazines. However, some other classes of compounds including polyketides and lipopeptides were also observed, showing a promising chemical diversity to be explored.

Notes

Abbreviations

DKPs: 

diketopiperazines

LC/MS: 

liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

ESI: 

electrospray ionization

TFA-Na: 

sodium trifluoroacetate

UV-HPLC-HRMS: 

ultraviolet-high performance liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CD-C, SF, MMZ and SB conceived and designed the study. CD-C, AC, LYR and TS performed the experiments. CD-C and SB wrote the paper. SF, MMZ, JR and FAR reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Fundación MEDINA for its invaluable help in the analysis of secondary metabolite.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets supporting the conclusions of the manuscript were included in the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (Colciencias—Contrato RC 0016-2013), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Corpogen. It was done under MAVDT contract No. 0104.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unidad de Saneamiento y Biotecnología Ambiental, Departamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá DC, Colombia
(2)
Corporación Corpogen, Bogotá DC, Colombia
(3)
Grupo de Inmunobiología y Unidad de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá DC, Colombia
(4)
Grupo de Investigación Fitoquímica, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá DC, Colombia
(5)
Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

References

  1. Aleti G, Sessitsch A, Brader G (2015) Genome mining: prediction of lipopeptides and polyketides from Bacillus and related Firmicutes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 13:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.03.003 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA/AWWA/WEF (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd  edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, p 1360. ISBN 978-087553-013-0Google Scholar
  3. Bitzer J, Grosse T, Wang L, Lang S, Beil W, Zeeck A (2006) New aminophenoxazinones from a marine Halomonas sp.: fermentation, structure elucidation, and biological activity. J Antibiot 59:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2006.12 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braña AF, Fiedler HP, Nava H, González V, Sarmiento-Vizcaíno A, Molina A, Acuña JL, García LA, Blanco G (2015) Two Streptomyces species producing antibiotic, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory compounds are widespread among intertidal macroalgae and deep-sea coral reef invertebrates from the Central Cantabrian Sea. Microb Ecol 69:512–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0508-0 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cayol JL, Ollivier B, Patel BK, Ravot G, Magot M, Ageron E, Grimont PA, Garcia JL (1995) Description of Thermoanaerobacter brockii subsp. lactiethylicus subsp. nov., isolated from a deep subsurface French oil well, a proposal to reclassify Thermoanaerobacter finnii as Thermoanaerobacter brockii subsp. finnii comb. nov., and an emended descrip. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:783–789. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-4-783 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Wang G, Bu T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Liu M, Lin X (2010) Phylogenetic analysis and screening of antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from the Weihai Solar Saltern (China). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:879–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0247-4 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Claverías FP, Undabarrena A, González M, Seeger M, Cámara B (2015) Culturable diversity and antimicrobial activity of Actinobacteria from marine sediments in Valparaíso bay, Chile. Front Microbiol 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00737 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. da Silva FSP, Pylro VS, Fernandes PL, Barcelos GS, Kalks KHM, Schaefer CEGR, Tótola MR (2015) Unexplored Brazilian oceanic island host high salt tolerant biosurfactant-producing bacterial strains. Extremophiles 19:561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-015-0740-7 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Cardale-Schrimpff M (1978) No title Breve informe sobre unas excavaciones arqueológicas realizadas en las salinas de Zipaquira, Cundinamarca. Bol Mus del Oro 1:39–41Google Scholar
  10. Demain AL (2014) Importance of microbial natural products and the need to revitalize their discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1325-z View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey G, Bharti R, Dhanarajan G, Das S, Dey KK, Kumar BNP, Sen R, Mandal M (2015) Marine lipopeptide Iturin A inhibits Akt mediated GSK3β and FoxO3a signaling and triggers apoptosis in breast cancer. Sci Rep 5:10316. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10316 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Díaz-Cárdenas C, Baena S (2015) Manantiales salinos: inventarios de Diversidad Metabólica y filogenética de microorganismos de ambientes salinos. Rev la Acad Colomb Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Nat 39:358. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.199 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Elleuch L, Shaaban M, Smaoui S, Mellouli L, Karray-Rebai I, Fourati-Ben Fguira L, Shaaban KA, Laatsch H (2010) Bioactive secondary metabolites from a new terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TN262. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:579–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8808-4 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fdhila F, Vázquez V, Sánchez JL, Riguera R (2003) dd-Diketopiperazines: antibiotics active against Vibrio anguillarum isolated from marine bacteria associated with cultures of Pecten maximus. J Nat Prod 66:1299–1301. https://doi.org/10.1021/np030233e View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu P, Liu P, Qu H, Wang Y, Chen D, Wang H, Li J, Zhu W (2011) α-Pyrones and diketopiperazine derivatives from the marine-derived actinomycete Nocardiopsis dassonvillei hr10-5. J Nat Prod 74:2219–2223. https://doi.org/10.1021/np200597m View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallardo K, Candia JE, Remonsellez F, Escudero LV, Demergasso CS (2016) The ecological coherence of temperature and salinity tolerance interaction and pigmentation in a non-marine Vibrio isolated from Salar de Atacama. Front Microbiol 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01943 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gan M, Liu B, Tan Y, Wang Q, Zhou H, He H, Ping Y, Yang Z, Wang Y, Xiao C (2015) Saccharothrixones A-D, tetracenomycin-type polyketides from the marine-derived actinomycete Saccharothrix sp. 10-10. J Nat Prod 78:2260–2265. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00577 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. González-Menéndez V, Pérez-Bonilla M, Pérez-Victoria I, Martín J, Muñoz F, Reyes F, Tormo JR, Genilloud O (2016) Multicomponent analysis of the differential induction of secondary metabolite profiles in fungal endophytes. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21020234 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Graça AP, Bondoso J, Gaspar H, Xavier JR, Monteiro MC, de la Cruz M, Oves-Costales D, Vicente F, Lage OM (2013) Antimicrobial activity of heterotrophic bacterial communities from the marine sponge Erylus discophorus (Astrophorida, Geodiidae). PLoS ONE 8(11):e78992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078992 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu Q, Fu L, Wang Y, Lin J (2013) Identification and characterization of extracellular cyclic dipeptides as quorum-sensing signal molecules from Shewanella baltica, the specific spoilage organism of Pseudosciaena crocea during 4℃ storage. J Agric Food Chem 61:11645–11652. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf403918x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall T (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  22. Kim PI, Ryu J, Kim YH, Chi YT (2010) Production of biosurfactant lipopeptides Iturin A, fengycin, and surfactin A from Bacillus subtilis CMB32 for control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:138–145. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0905.05007 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Karthikeyan P, Bhat SG, Chandrasekaran M (2013) Halocin SH10 production by an extreme haloarchaeon Natrinema sp. BTSH10 isolated from salt pans of South India. Saudi J Biol Sci 20:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.02.002 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim SY, Kim JY, Kim SH, Bae HJ, Yi H, Yoon SH, Koo BS, Kwon M, Cho JY, Lee CE, Hong S (2007) Surfactin from Bacillus subtilis displays anti-proliferative effect via apoptosis induction, cell cycle arrest and survival signaling suppression. FEBS Lett 581(5):865–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.059 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim DH, Kim HK, Kim KM, Kim CK, Jeong MH, Ko CY, Moon KH, Kang JS (2011) Antibacterial activities of macrolactin a and 7-O-succinyl macrolactin a from Bacillus polyfermenticus KJS-2 against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Pharm Res 34:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-011-0117-0 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J, Shin D, Kim S-H, Park W, Shin Y, Kim WK, Lee SK, Oh K-B, Shin J, Oh D-C (2017) Borrelidins C-E: new antibacterial macrolides from a saltern-derived halophilic Nocardiopsis sp. Mar Drugs 15:166. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15060166 View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175Google Scholar
  28. Mahmoud HM, Kalendar AA (2016) Coral-associated Actinobacteria: diversity, abundance, and biotechnological potentials. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00204 Google Scholar
  29. Martins MB, Carvalho I (2007) Diketopiperazines: biological activity and synthesis. Tetrahedron 63:9923–9932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mata JA, Béjar V, Llamas I, Arias S, Bressollier P, Tallon R, Urdaci MC, Quesada E (2006) Exopolysaccharides produced by the recently described halophilic bacteria Halomonas ventosae and Halomonas anticariensis. Res Microbiol 157(9):827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2006.06.004 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nishanth Kumar S, Mohandas C, Siji JV, Rajasekharan KN, Nambisan B (2012) Identification of antimicrobial compound, diketopiperazines, from a Bacillus sp. N strain associated with a rhabditid entomopathogenic nematode against major plant pathogenic fungi. J Appl Microbiol 113:914–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05385.x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Connor EM, Shand RF (2002) Halocins and sulfolobicins: the emerging story of archaeal protein and peptide antibiotics. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 28:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/jim/7000190 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Oren A (2010) Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol 8–9:825–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330903370026 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Phelan RW, O’Halloran JA, Kennedy J, Morrissey JP, Dobson ADW, O’Gara F, Barbosa TM (2012) Diversity and bioactive potential of endospore-forming bacteria cultured from the marine sponge Haliclona simulans. J Appl Microbiol 112:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05173.x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Raju R, Piggott AM, Conte M, Aalbersberg WGL, Feussner K, Capon RJ (2009) Naseseazines A and B: a new dimeric diketopiperazine framework from a marine-derived actinomycete, streptomyces sp. Org Lett 11:3862–3865. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol901466r View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Raskin L, Stromley JM, Rittmann BE, Stahl DA (1994) Group-Specific 16S ribosomal-RNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1232–1240PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Regmi SC, Park SY, Kim SJ, Banskota S, Shah S, Kim D-H, Kim J-A (2015) The anti-tumor activity of succinyl macrolactin A is mediated through the β-Catenin Destruction complex via the suppression of tankyrase and PI3K/Akt. PLoS ONE 10:e0141753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141753 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL (2008) Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc 3:1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.75 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Running W (1993) Computer software reviews. Chapman and Hall dictionary of natural products on CD-ROM. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 33:934–935View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sagar S, Esau L, Hikmawan T, Antunes A, Holtermann K, Stingl U, Bajic VB, Kaur M (2013) Cytotoxic and apoptotic evaluations of marine bacteria isolated from brine–seawater interface of the Red Sea. BMC Complement Altern Med 13:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-29 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Schultz AW, Oh DC, Carney JR, Williamson RT, Udwary DW, Jensen PR, Gould SJ, Fenical W, Moore BS (2008) Biosynthesis and structures of cyclomarins and cyclomarazines, prenylated cyclic peptides of marine actinobacterial origin. J Am Chem Soc 130:4507–4516. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja711188x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shin HJ, Lee H-S, Lee D-S (2010) The synergistic antibacterial activity of 1-acetyl-beta-carboline and beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:501–505. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0910.10019 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Son S, Ko SK, Jang M, Kim JW, Kim GS, Lee JK, Jeon ES, Futamura Y, Ryoo IJ, Lee JS, Oh H (2016) New cyclic lipopeptides of the iturin class produced by saltern-derived Bacillus sp. KCB14S006. Mar Drugs 14(4):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/md14040072 View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Stahl DA, Amann R (1991) Development and application of nucleic acid probes in bacterial systematics. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–248Google Scholar
  46. Stein T (2005) Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol 56:845–857View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Takashina T, Otozati K, Hamamoto T, Horikoshi K (1994) Isolation of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria from a Japanese salt field and comparison of the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence of an extremely halophilic isolate with those of other extreme halophiles. Biodivers Conserv 3:632–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114206 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Tommonaro G, Abbamondi GR, Iodice C, Tait K, De Rosa S (2012) Diketopiperazines produced by the Halophilic Archaeon, Haloterrigena hispanica, activate AHL bioreporters. Microb Ecol 63:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9980-y View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. van der Merwe E, Huang D, Peterson D, Kilian G, Milne PJ, Van de Venter M, Frost C (2008) The synthesis and anticancer activity of selected diketopiperazines. Peptides 29:1305–1311View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ventosa Ucero A, Quesada Arroquia E, Rodríguez Valera F, Ruiz Berraquero F, Ramos Cormenzana A (1982) Numerical taxonomy of moderately halophilic Gram-negative rods. J Gen Microbiol 128:1959–1968Google Scholar
  51. Ventosa A, Fernández AB, León MJ, Sánchez-Porro C, Rodriguez-Valera F (2014) The Santa Pola saltern as a model for studying the microbiota of hypersaline environments. Extremophiles 18:811–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-014-0681-6 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vollenbroich D, Ozel M, Vater J, Kamp RM, Pauli G (1997) Mechanism of inactivation of enveloped viruses by the biosurfactant surfactin from Bacillus subtilis. Biologicals 25:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/biol.1997.0099 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Walsh CT, Fischbach MA (2010) Natural products version 2.0: connecting genes to molecules. J Am Chem Soc 132:2469–2493View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Widdel F, Kohring G-W, Mayer F (1983) Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. Arch Microbiol 134:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407804 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Yonezawa K, Yamada K, Kouno I (2011) New diketopiperazine derivatives isolated from Sea Urchin-derived Bacillus sp. Chem PharmBull 59:106–108. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.59.106 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang L (2005) Integrated approaches for discovering novel drugs from microbial natural products. In: Zhang L, Demain AL (eds) Natural products. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-976-9_2
  57. Zhang Q, Li S, Chen Y, Tian X, Zhang H, Zhang G, Zhu Y, Zhang S, Zhang W, Zhang C (2013) New diketopiperazine derivatives from a deep-sea-derived Nocardiopsis alba SCSIO 03039. J Antibiot 66:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2012.88 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017
corrected publication February 2018

Advertisement