Skip to content

Advertisement

AMB Express
AMB Express Cover Image
  • Original article
  • Open Access

Production of a modified peptide clavanin in Pichia pastoris: cloning, expression, purification and in vitro activities

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 2Email author
AMB Express20155:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-015-0129-0

©  Mulder et al. 2015

  • Received: 1 June 2015
  • Accepted: 7 July 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides are one of the most promising peptide-based drugs due to their enormous potential as novel biopharmaceuticals in both human and animal industries. In order to develop strategies to over produce such molecules, heterologous production of a modified version of clavanin A, here named clavanin MO (clavMO), was successfully achieved in the methylothopic yeast Pichia pastoris. ClavMO was fused to thioredoxin as a carrier protein and the construction was tested using two promoters, PAOX1 and PGAP, based on either induced or constitutive expression systems, respectively. After growth in 5 L Bioreactor, clavMO-thio was recovered and purified through size exclusion chromatography. Our findings show that both constitutive and inducible expression systems produce active clavMO fused to thioredoxin against both Gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus microorganisms.

Keywords

  • Heterologous expression
  • Antimicrobial peptide
  • Pichia pastoris
  • Clavanin

Introduction

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are one of the most promising peptide-based drugs due to their enormous potential as novel biopharmaceutical compounds for the human and animal health industries as well as for their application in agriculture (Agyei and Danquah 2011; Mulder et al. 2013a; Silva et al. 2011a). The increase in interest over these molecules has driven researchers to explore alternatives to chemical synthesis for its large-scale production. The production of AMPs using heterologous systems has many advantages, such as allowing post-translational modification and permitting researchers to develop the best genetic strategy to increase its production, and most importantly, there is an extensive flexibility in microbial systems to be modified and scale-up (Mulder et al. 2013b). The heterologous expression of AMPs has been reported to be successfully performed in diverse organisms such as bacteria, plants and yeast (Parachin et al. 2012).

Among these organisms, the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has been a promising candidate for the heterologous production of AMPs. It has been used for the production of AMPs derived from different sources such as humans (Hong et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2009), mammals (Tang et al. 2012; Zhao and Cao 2012), plants (Cabral et al. 2003; Kant et al. 2009), bacteria (Basanta et al. 2010; Jimenez et al. 2014) and fungi (Varnai et al. 2014; Viragh et al. 2014). From its initial usage in the early 1970s, throughout its complete genome sequence (De Schutter et al. 2009; Mattanovich et al. 2009), to today, P. pastoris has become one of the most extensively studied yeasts and presents a versatile system for the production of heterologous proteins (Ahmad et al. 2014). The most common expression vectors use a genetic construction based on either alcohol oxidase I (AOX1) or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) promoters, named PAOX1 and PGAP, respectively (Ellis et al. 1985; Waterham et al. 1997). PAOX1 is a potent and tightly regulated methanol-inducible promoter; therefore it allows for the controlled expression of foreign proteins, especially when they are toxic to the host. PGAP is constitutive, and one of its reported advantages is that it simplifies cultivation by avoiding the addition of methanol as a carbon source (Zhang et al. 2009). For instance, human cathelicidin (hCAP18) (Hong et al. 2007) and corn defensin (PDC1) (Kant et al. 2009) have been expressed in P. pastoris using a constitutive promoter system. On the other hand, many AMPs have been produced using the AOX1 promoter system reaching over 1 g g−1 of dry cell weight (DCW), as was recently reviewed (Parachin et al. 2012).

The AMP used in this work was clavanin MO (clavMO) (Silva et al. 2011b), a synthetic variant of amphipathic alpha-helical peptide clavanin A (clavA). ClavA was first isolated from hemocytes of the tunicate Styela clava. The peptide clavA presents, among its 23 residues, strategically placed histidine residues which provide its pH-dependent antimicrobial activity, as well as glycine and phenylalanine residues which confer to this peptide a relative conformational flexibility and hydrophobicity, thus facilitating its insertion into the target membrane (van Kan et al. 2003b). ClavMO is 5 amino acid residues longer than clavA, and it has been shown to have higher antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, clavMO has also presented immunomodulatory, antitumor and antiviral activities (Silva et al. 2011b).

Due to its high potential as a new antimicrobial peptide, a large amount of clavMO is currently required for the production of different drug-delivery systems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish a system for large-scale production of heterologous clavMO in P. pastoris. For that, two promoters, PAOX1 and PGAP were tested based on two expression systems, induced and constitutive, respectively. ClavMO was fused to thioredoxin as a carrier protein, chosen for its properties of increasing both stability and solubility of heterologous proteins (Esposito and Chatterjee 2006). Our findings show that the induced system produces active clavMO against the microorganisms K. pneumoniae and S. aureus.

Materials and methods

Strains and plasmids

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are presented in Table 1. The strains were grown at 37°C in Luria broth medium (0.5% Yeast extract, 1% Peptone and 1% Sodium Chloride), and the yeast strains were grown at 28°C in either YPD (0.5% Yeast extract, 1% Peptone and 2% Dextrose) or BMGY media (2% Peptone, 1% Yeast extract, 100 mM Potassium phosphate pH 6, 1.34% Yeast Nitrogen Base (w/o AA), 0.4 µg/mL Biotin, 1% Glycerol). When necessary, the media were supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics (ampicillin for Escherichia coli cultivations at 100 µg/mL, and zeocin for P. pastoris cultivation at 100 µg/mL). The gene containing the carrier protein thioredoxin fused to the peptide clavMO was cloned into both expression vectors pPICZαA and pGAPZαB, under the methanol-inducible PAOX1 promoter and the constitutive PGAP promoter, respectively.
Table 1

Strain and plasmids used in this work

Strain and plasmids

Genotype

Reference

Strains

 E coli

  XL1-Blue

EndA1 gyrA96(nalR) thi-1 recA1 relA1 lac glnV44 F’[::Tn10 proAB+ lacIq Δ(lacZ)M15] hsdR17(r K −  m K + )

Stratagene

 P. pastoris

  X33

Wild type

 

  X33/pPICZαA-clavMO

X33 transformed with the plasmid pPICZαA-clavMO

This work

  X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO

X33 transformed with the plasmid pGAPZαB-clavMO

This work

Plasmids

 pPICZα A

Fator-α as secretion signal, AOX1 promotor, bler

 

 pGAPZα B

Fator-α as secretion signal, PGAP promotor, bler

 

 pPICZαA-clavMO

pPICZαA with the gene coding for the cassette thioredoxin-clavanin MO

This work

 pGAPZαB-clavMO

pGAPZαB with the gene coding for the cassette thioredoxin-clavanin MO

This work

Cloning

The thio-clavMO gene sequence was synthesized by Epoch Life Science (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To clone the gene into both plasmids pPICZαA and pGAPZαB, the restriction sites EcoRI and SacII were used, resulting in the expression vectors pPICZαA-clavMO and pGAPZαB-clavMO (Figure 1; Table 1). Both plasmids were firstly transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue strains and sequenced to confirm the insertion of the expression cassette.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Plasmid vector map. The constitutive system was developed using the plasmid pGAPZαB, which contains the PGAP promoter. The inducible system was constructed using the pPICZαA, which contains the PAOX promoter. HIS his-tag, Trx thioredoxin E. coli gene, Cla clavanin gene, AOX TT terminator.

Yeast transformation

The vectors whose constructions were confirmed by sequencing were inserted into the P. pastoris X-33 strain using the electroporation method as described by Invitrogen™. Briefly, cells of the X-33 strain were grown in solid YPD at 28°C for 2–3 days. A single colony was then grown in 5 mL of YPD overnight at 30°C at 250 rpm. 0.1 to 0.5 mL of this culture was inoculated into 100 mL of YPD and grown at 30°C at 250 rpm until an OD600 of 1.3–1.5 was reached. The cells were centrifuged at 1,500g for 5 min and washed three times with ice-cold distilled water and then resuspended in 1 M cold sorbitol. Plasmids to be inserted in P. pastoris were linearized with AvrII and BglII for pGAP and pPIC, respectively. About 10 μg of linearized DNA was added to 80 μL of competent cells and 320 μL of 1.0 M sorbitol. Electrical shock using 0.2 cm cuvette was performed using Gene Pulser II (Biorad). After electric shock, 1 mL of 1 M cold sorbitol was added to the cells followed by incubation at 30°C. After 1 h of incubation, cells were plated in solid YPD medium supplemented with zeocin 100 µg/mL and stored at 28°C for 2–3 days.

Evaluation of clavMO production

In order to evaluate the production of clavMO in both plasmids, a single colony from each X33/pPICZαA-clavMO and X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO (Table 1) was inoculated into YPD medium at 28°C and cultivated overnight at 200 rpm of agitation. Both strains were inoculated in 100 mL BMGY to reach an OD600 of 0.2 and grew for 96 h. Samples were collected at times 0, 24, 48, 70 h. The pPICZαA-clavMO strain was induced every 24 h with methanol 100% to a final concentration of 0.5% in order to induce the gene encoding for clavMO cloned under the AOX1 promoter.

Protein quantification, SDS-PAGE and immunoblot assays

Protein quantification was performed by using Qubit-Invitrogen™ according to manufacturer’s instructions. For the Western blot and SDS-PAGE experiments, 150 µg/mL of protein from cultured supernatant was collected by the TCA (trichloroacetic acid) precipitation method using TCA at 75%. The pellet was washed twice with ice-cold acetone and dissolved in 25 μL 3× Laemmli buffer (Laemmli 1970), boiled for 10 min, centrifuged briefly and loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel using protein molecular weight (Thermo Scientific™). SDS-PAGE was silver stained as previously described (Blum et al. 1987). In order to detect proteins, the protein samples were first separated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred under semi-dry conditions onto a nitrocellulose membrane using electroblotting (Towbin et al. 1979). The electrophoretic transfer of proteins was performed in the Trans-Blot SD (Biorad) and carried out for 15 min at 13 V, 3 A and 300 mA using Blotting buffer (3 g Tris, 14 g glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol, 0.1% (w/v) SDS). After transference, membrane blocking was achieved by incubation in AP-T buffer (1 M Tris/HCl pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl, 25 mM MgCl2, 0.03% (v/v) Tween 20) containing 5% (w/v) milk powder. The following steps were then carried out only in AP-T buffer. The procedure for detection of labeled proteins was performed using polyclonal antibodies against thioredoxin (1:5,000) and revealed using BCIP/NBT solution, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Growth of X-33 pPicZ-clavMO in 5 L Bioreactor

The strain X-33/pPic-clavMO was grown in a 5 L bioreactor (Bio Flo115, New Brunswick). For cultivation in the bioreactor, BMGY media was used containing 40 g l−1 glycerol. Pre-growth was performed in 100 mL BMGY shake flasks for 30 h. The cells were centrifuged and inoculated in the bioreactor to reach an initial OD600 of 0.5. Glycerol was used for 24 h of growth, after which methanol was fed into the bioreactor for a final concentration of 0.5% every 12 h up to 72 h. At the end of the fermentation, 5 L culture medium was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was concentrated 10-fold using Quickstand (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) by diafiltration using hollow fiber cartridge with a cut-off of 3,000 NMWC.

Peptide isolation

Concentrated supernatant from the culture of the strain X-33/pPic-clavMO containing 5 mg/mL of protein extract was lyophilized and injected into a size exclusion chromatography Äkta purifier (GE Healthcare). The column utilized was the Hiload™ 16/60 Superdex™ 75 prep grade column (GE Healthcare). This was equilibrated with filtered and degassed water MilliQ at room temperature. The flow rate utilized was 0.8 mL/min. Fractions were eluted with 5 mL volumes, totaling 22 fractions. These were monitored at 216 and 280 nm for 270 min. The fractions from 16 to 22 were lyophilized and used for further antibacterial assays.

Antibacterial assays

The antibacterial assays were carried out by microdilution assay using an Elisa reader for 96-well microplates (Biotek, USA). Microdilution assays were performed according to the standards of the CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute) (2010; 2012). Antimicrobial activity assays were performed using K. pneumoniae (ATCC13883) and S. aureus (ATCC25923). For each assay, chloramphenicol (30 µg/mL) was used as positive control (C+) and MH broth at pH 7.3 as a negative control. Bacterial growth was monitored every 30 min until it reached the stationary phase (about 24 h). The protein fractions 16–22 were utilized in a concentration of 120 µg/mL. Percentage of bacterial growth inhibition values was based on the absorbency values at 625 nm, which were compared with the values obtained for C+ (representing 100% bacterial growth inhibition). All antibacterial assays were performed in triplicate.

Results

Production of clavMO

X-33/pPICZαA-clavMO and X-33/pGAPZαB-clavMO were selected for growth experiments and heterologous peptide production. P. pastoris containing the constitutive expression cassette, pGAPZαB-clavMO, resulted in about 1.5-fold lower final OD when compared to the strain containing the inducible expression cassette pPICZαA-clavMO (Figure 2). Therefore for the evaluation of antibacterial activity of clavMO the strain pPICZαA-clavMO was chosen.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Growth of P. pastoris strains X33/pPICZαA-clavMO (PAOX, triangle) and X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO (PGAP, square). Growth was monitored by OD600 every 24 h. Methanol (0.5%) was added to P. pastoris strain X33/pPICZαA-clavMO after 30 h of growth. Experiments were done in triplicate where figure shows the growth profile within 10% standard deviation.

Analysis of recombinant clavMO by Western blot

Supernatant of the strains X33/pPICZαA-clavMO and X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO were collected at 0, 24, 48 and 70 h. Samples of 150 µg/mL from supernatant from the culture were applied into an SDS-PAGE (12%) prior Western blot assay. According to the results obtained, it can be observed that the expression of the recombinant clavMO was detected at 48 and 70 h in both strains while no recombinant protein was detected prior induction with Methanol (Figure 3). It was also observed that the appropriated time for induction of the promoter AOX1 in the X33/pPICZαA-clavMO strain was after 30 h when all initial glycerol was entirely consumed (Figure 3, lower panel), as well as the constitutive expression of the promoter PGAP for production of the recombinant clavMO in the X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO strain (Figure 3, upper panel). The predicted size of Thioredoxin-ClavMO fused gene was 34.47717 kDa (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/). Our Western blot results show that the detected protein correspondent to our expression cassette was between 35 and 40 kda (Figure 3), therefore, bigger than the predicted MW.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Western blot assay of the supernatant of the strains X33/pGAPZαB-clavMO (upper panel) X33/pPICZαA-clavMO (lower panel). Samples were collected at times 0, 24, 48 and 70 h. MW molecular weight (kD). Antibody anti-his tag 1:5,000

Purification

Figure 4 shows the profile of the P. pastoris supernatant containing X33/pPICZαA-clavMO after 70 h of cultivation. From purification of 5 mg/mL of protein extract into a size exclusion chromatography, seven fractions were collected, numbered 16–22, and were selected for further analysis. After lyophilization, these samples were used to perform antibacterial assays, and two fractions, 21 and 22, were shown to have antibacterial activity. SDS-PAGE analyses of theses samples had shown the protein band corresponding to the molecular mass of clavMO but with different purity degrees (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Chromatogram profile of supernatant of strain X-33/pPic-clavMO. 5 mg/mL of protein extract using a Hiload™ 16/60 Superdex™ 75 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) originating 24 fractions eluted in approximately 5 mL and monitored at 280 nm. The silver-stained gel shows the protein recovered from fractions 21 and 22 after purification process. MW molecular weight (kD).

Antibacterial assays

Preliminary bioassays revealed that some fractions showed low protein quantification and no antibacterial activity. Therefore, the fractions ranging from 16 to 22 were chosen for antibacterial bioassay due to their higher absorbance at 280 nm. Bioassays were performed against Gram-negative K. pneumoniae and Gram-positive S. aureus bacteria. For each bioassay, 120 µg/mL of X-33/pPic-clavMO protein was used in triplicate. The bioassay against K. pneumoniae showed antibacterial activity for fraction 21 and 22 where bacterial growth was reduced by 56 and 8%, respectively (Table 2). On the other hand, the bioassay performed against S. aureus showed antibacterial activity for fractions 21 and 22 where bacterial growth was inhibited by 68 and 89%, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Antibacterial assay against K. pneumoniae and S. aureus using 120 µg/mL of X-33/pPic-clavMO protein for 24 h at absorbance λ = 625 nm

Antibacterial activity (%)

Fractions X-33/pPic-clavMO

Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC13883)

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC25923)

16

NS

NS

17

NS

NS

18

NS

NS

19

NS

NS

20

NS

NS

21

56 ± 1.4

68 ± 1.7

22

8 ± 1.2

89 ± 1.4

Values were represented by mean ± standard deviation. Chloramphenicol (30 µg/mL) and MH broth, pH: 7.3, as positive and negative controls, respectively.

NS not significant.

Discussion

Heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides has been attempted in several hosts over the last few years. After the bacterium Escherichia coli, yeasts are the second most used system for heterologous peptide production (Parachin et al. 2012). In this study, heterologous production of a modified clavanin fused to thioredoxin, clavMO-thio, was initially attempted in different E. coli strains. Nevertheless, expression of the encoding gene could never be confirmed (Additional file 2: Figure S2, Additional file 3: Figure S3 and Additional file 4: Figure S4). The same has been previously observed when the production of SPE10 isolated from the Pachyrrhizus erosus peptide was attempted in both E. coli and P. pastoris where heterologous peptide production could only be confirmed when produced in yeast (Song et al. 2005).

Although Sacharomyces cerevisiae is the most common yeast utilized for biopharmaceutical production, the yeast P. pastoris was chosen as the host in this study for having a GRAS (Generally Regards As Safe) status, the ability to grow in high cell density cultures (since it does not present fermentative behavior), and its reported high levels of secreted recombinant protein, which simplifies downstream purification processes (Ahmad et al. 2014). Finally, most recombinant AMPs produced in yeast use P. pastoris as a host (Parachin et al. 2012).

Although some companies claim the production of recombinant clavanins isoforms such as B, C, D and E using both S. cerevisiae and E. coli as hosts, herein we report for the first time the heterologous production of clavanin using P. pastoris as a host to express clavMO. Synthetic ClavMO is reported to have higher antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive (e.g., 78.75 µM against S. aureus ATCC29213; 2.5-fold higher than synthetic clavA) and Gram-negative bacteria (e.g. 39.40 µM against K. pneumoniae—ATCC13885; 2.5-fold higher than synthetic clavA). Furthermore, clavMO has also presented immunomodulatory, antitumor, antiviral and insecticide activities (Silva et al. 2011b).

In this study Clav-MO fused to thioredoxin in its N-terminal presented antibacterial activity. Although one could argue that thioredoxin could have inhibitory activity by itself its gene sequence was from the E. coli genome where it has been previously described its role in defense against oxidative stress or in control of apoptosis (Arnér and Holgren 2000). Moreover thioredoxin is frequently used as a carrier protein for production of recombinant antimicrobial peptide representing more than 20% of all reported fusion expressions of antimicrobial peptides (Li 2009). Finally, in a study for heterologous production of viscotoxin where 13 fusion proteins were tested, thioredoxin gave the highest yield of soluble protein (Bogomolovas et al. 2009). For all those reasons we claimed that the activity against the microorganisms tested in our work is derived from the activity of the peptide clav-MO.

Here we demonstrate the production of a heterologous AMP using both constitutive and inducible promoters. Few of the reported studies used a constitutive promoter to express gene encoding for AMPs (Guo et al. 2012; Hong et al. 2007; Yu et al. 2010). Constitutive AMP production is advantageous as the fermentation process is facilitated because there is no need for additional inductor or media exchange. Nevertheless, if the AMP has antifungal activity, the use of such a promoter is not advisable, for it impairs yeast growth and consequently heterologous AMP production. In all reported cases, the amount of heterologous peptide produced using constitutive promoter was not reported. Moreover, in this study the strain with constitutive cassette had a negative impact on final OD, which corroborates previous studies and reinforces the utilization of inducible constructions for heterologous production of AMP.

Regarding clavanin mode of action, it is known that its bactericide activity is related to membrane stability in a pH dependent form (van Kan et al. 2001, 2002, 2003a). Furthermore, clavanin A has been shown to interact with lipid bi-layers, resulting in drastic changes in membrane morphology (van Kan et al. 2003b). Recently, our group has shown that nanoformulated clavanin A inhibit bacterial growth of S. aureus, K. pneumoniae and Pseudonomas aeruginosa, being an excellent candidate for treating patients contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Saúde et al. 2014). Another work form our group has shown that clavanin A is effective in treatments of wound and sepsis infections by avoiding the beginning of sepsis, and as consequence, it reduces mortality (Silva et al. 2015).

Nevertheless, the chemical synthesis of clavanin aiming at nanoformulation is not cost-effective. In this study, recombinant clavMO was shown to inhibit both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, it presents an initial step for the development of cost-effective, large-scale production of this AMP.

In this study, for the first time, the modified version of clavanin A, clavMO was heterologously produced in P. pastoris using both constitutive and inducible expression cassettes. Both systems yielded protein detection in yeast supernatant by Western blot assays. The strain with integrated constitutive construction resulted in lower final OD when compared to the strain with the inducible construction integrated in its genome. Therefore, the strain producing clavMO after induction with metanol was chosen for the following experiments. ClavMO was produced in a 5 L scale followed up by purification using gel filtration. Finally, antimicrobial assays showed that recombinant clavMO could inhibit up to 56 and 89% Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Conclusively, it is evident that P. pastoris is an excellent host for the functional production of clavMO, and that this system may be utilized for further scale-up production of AMPs.

Abbreviations

AMP: 

antimicrobial peptide

ClavMO: 

clavanin modified

ClavA: 

clavanina A

AOX1: 

alcohol oxidase I

GAP: 

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors have equally contributed to this work and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Educational Personnel (CAPES), the Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District (FAPDF), the Foundation for Educational, Research and Technology of Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT), and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MCT) are acknowledged for financial support.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Análises Proteômicas e Bioquímicas, Pós-Graduação em Ciências Genômicas e Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil
(2)
Grupo Engenharia de Biocatalisadores, Departamento de Biologia Celular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, CEP 70.790-900, Brazil
(3)
S-Inova, Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

References

  1. Agyei D, Danquah MK (2011) Industrial-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical-grade bioactive peptides. Biotechnol Adv 29(3):272–277PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad M, Hirz M, Pichler H, Schwab H (2014) Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(2):5301–5317PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnér ES, Holgren A (2000) Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur J Biochem 267(20):6102–6109PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Basanta A, Gómez-Sala B, Sánchez J, Diep DB, Herranz C, Hernández PE et al (2010) Use of the yeast Pichia pastoris as an expression host for secretion of enterocin L50, a leaderless two-peptide (L50A and L50B) bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium L50. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(10):3314–33124PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ (1987) Improved silver staining of plant-proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8(2):93–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogomolovas J, Simon B, Sattler M, Stier G (2009) Screening of fusion partners for high yield expression and purification of bioactive viscotoxins. Protein Expr Purif 64(1):16–23PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabral KM, Almeida MS, Valente AP, Almeida FC, Kurtenbach E (2003) Production of the active antifungal Pisum sativum defensin 1 (Psd1) in Pichia pastoris: overcoming the inefficiency of the STE13 protease. Protein Expr Purif 31(1):115–122PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. De Schutter K, Lin YC, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Glinka S, Weber-Lehmann J et al (2009) Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris. Nat Biotechnol 27(6):561–566PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis SB, Brust PF, Koutz PJ, Waters AF, Harpold MM, Gingeras TR (1985) Isolation of alcohol oxidase and two other methanol regulatable genes from the yeast Pichia pastoris. Mol Cell Biol 5(5):1111–1121PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Esposito D, Chatterjee DK (2006) Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17(4):353–358PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo C, Huang Y, Zheng H, Tang L, He J, Xiang L et al (2012) Secretion and activity of antimicrobial peptide cecropin D expressed in Pichia pastoris. Exp Ther Med 4(6):1063–1068PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong IP, Lee SJ, Kim YS, Choi SG (2007) Recombinant expression of human cathelicidin (hCAP18/LL-37) in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Lett 29(1):73–78PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jimenez JJ, Borrero J, Gutiez L, Arbulu S, Herranz C, Cintas LM et al (2014) Use of synthetic genes for cloning, production and functional expression of the bacteriocins enterocin A and bacteriocin E 50-52 by Pichia pastoris and Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol Biotechnol 56:571–583PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kant P, Liu WZ, Pauls KP (2009) PDC1, a corn defensin peptide expressed in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris inhibits growth of Fusarium graminearum. Peptides 30(9):1593–1599PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim SJ, Quan R, Lee SJ, Lee HK, Choi JK (2009) Antibacterial activity of recombinant hCAP18/LL37 protein secreted from Pichia pastoris. J Microbiol 47(3):358–362PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(5259):680–685PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y (2009) Carrier proteins for fusion expression of antimicrobial peptides in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 54(1):1–9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattanovich D, Callewaert N, Rouzé P, Lin Y-C, Graf A, Redl A et al (2009) Open access to sequence: browsing the Pichia pastoris genome. Microb Cell Fact 8:53PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulder KCL, Lima LA, Miranda VJ, Dias SC, Franco OL (2013a) Current scenario of peptide-based drugs: the key roles of cationic antitumor and antiviral peptides. Front Microbiol 4:321PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mulder KCL, Viana AAB, Xavier X, Parachin NS (2013b) Critical Aspects to be considered prior to Large-Scale Production of peptides. Curr Protein Pept Sci 14:556–567PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Parachin NS, Mulder KC, Viana AA, Dias SC, Franco OL (2012) Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides. Peptides 38(2):446–456PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Saúde AC, Ombredane AS, Silva ON, Barbosa JA, Moreno SE, Araujo AC et al (2014) Clavanin bacterial sepsis control using a novel methacrylate nanocarrier. Int J Nanomed 9:5055–5069Google Scholar
  23. Silva ON, Mulder KC, Barbosa AE, Otero-Gonzalez AJ, Lopez-Abarrategui C, Rezende TM et al (2011) Exploring the pharmacological potential of promiscuous host-defense peptides: from natural screenings to biotechnological applications. Front Microbiol 2:232PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva ON, Migliolo L, Dias SC, Rezende TMB, Franco, OL (2011b) Patent: Antimicrobial, insecticide and antitumor synthetic molecule, composition, use and microorganism inhibition method. INPI, Brazil Patent Number 0000221109717908Google Scholar
  25. Silva ON, Fensterseifer ICM, Rodrigues EA, Holanda HHS, Novaes NRF, Cunha JPA et al (2015) Clavanin A improves outcome of complications from different bacterial infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(3):1620–1626PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Song X, Wang J, Wu F, Li X, Teng M, Gong W (2005) cDNA cloning, functional expression and antifungal activities of a dimeric plant defensin SPE10 from Pachyrrhizus erosus seeds. Plant Mol Biol 57(1):13–20PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang XS, Tang ZR, Wang SP, Feng ZM, Zhou D, Li TJ et al (2012) Expression, purification, and antibacterial activity of bovine lactoferrampin–lactoferricin in Pichia pastoris. Appl Biochem Biotech 166(3):640–651View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordo J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Biotechnol Adv 24:145–149Google Scholar
  29. van Kan EJ, van der Bent A, Demel RA, de Kruijff B (2001) Membrane activity of the peptide antibiotic clavanin and the importance of its glycine residues. Biochemistry 40(21):6398–6405PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. van Kan EJ, Demel RA, Breukink E, van der Bent A, de Kruijff B (2002) Clavanin permeabilizes target membranes via two distinctly different pH-dependent mechanisms. Biochemistry 41(24):7529–7539PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. van Kan EJ, Demel RA, van der Bent A, de Kruijff B (2003a) The role of the abundant phenylalanines in the mode of action of the antimicrobial peptide clavanin. Biochim Biophys Acta Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 1615(1–2):84–92Google Scholar
  32. van Kan EJ, Ganchev DN, Snel MM, Chupin V, van der Bent A, de Kruijff B (2003b) The peptide antibiotic clavanin A interacts strongly and specifically with lipid bilayers. Biochemistry 42(38):11366–11372PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Varnai A, Tang C, Bengtsson O, Atterton A, Mathiesen G, Eijsink VG (2014) Expression of endoglucanases in Pichia pastoris under control of the GAP promoter. Microb Cell Fact 13(1):57PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Viragh M, Voros D, Kele Z, Kovacs L, Fizil A, Lakatos G et al (2014) Production of a defensin-like antifungal protein NFAP from Neosartorya fischeri in Pichia pastoris and its antifungal activity against filamentous fungal isolates from human infections. Protein Expr Purif 94:79–84PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Waterham HR, Digan ME, Koutz PJ, Lair SV, Cregg JM (1997) Isolation of the Pichia pastoris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene and regulation and use of its promoter. Gene 186(1):37–44PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu R, Dong S, Zhu Y, Jin H, Gao M, Duan Z et al (2010) Effective and stable porcine interferon-alpha production by Pichia pastoris fed-batch cultivation with multi-variables clustering and analysis. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33(4):473–483PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang AL, Luo JX, Zhang TY, Pan YW, Tan YH, Fu CY et al (2009) Recent advances on the GAP promoter derived expression system of Pichia pastoris. Mol Biol Rep 36(6):1611–1619PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao P, Cao G (2012) Production of bioactive sheep beta-defensin-1 in Pichia pastoris. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39(1):11–17PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mulder et al. 2015

Advertisement