Open Access

Recombinant glucagon: a differential biological activity

  • Angelina M M Basso1, 2,
  • Patrícia B Pelegrini2,
  • Fernanda Mulinari2, 3,
  • Michelle C Costa2,
  • Antonio B Viana2, 4,
  • Luciano P Silva5 and
  • Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa2, 4Email author
AMB Express20155:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-015-0099-2

Received: 18 November 2014

Accepted: 22 January 2015

Published: 12 March 2015

Abstract

In Brazil, there is a growing demand for specialised pharmaceuticals, and the high cost of their importation results in increasing costs, reaching US$ 1.34 billion in 2012 and US$ 1.61 billion in 2013. Worldwide expenses related to drugs could reach US$ 1.3 trillion in 2018, especially due to new treatments for hepatitis C and cancer. Specialised or high-cost pharmaceutical drugs used for the treatment of viral hepatitis, multiple sclerosis, HIV and diabetes are distributed free of charge by the Brazilian government. The glucagon peptide was included in this group of high-cost biopharmaceuticals in 2008. Although its main application is the treatment of hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients, it can also be used with patients in an alcoholic coma, for those patients with biliary tract pain, and as a bronchodilator. Therefore, in order to reduce biopharmaceutical production costs, the Brazilian government passed laws focusing on the development and increase of a National Pharmaceutical Industrial Centre, including the demand for the national production of glucagon. For that reason and given the importance and high cost of recombinant glucagon, the purpose of this study was to develop methods to improve production, purification and performance of the biological activity of recombinant glucagon. Glucagon was recombined into a plasmid vector containing a Glutathione S-transferase tag, and the peptide was expressed in a heterologous Escherichia coli system. After purification procedures and molecular analyses, the biological activity of this recombinant glucagon was examined using in vivo assays and showed a highly significant (p < 0.00001) and prolonged effect on glucose levels when compared with the standard glucagon. The experimental procedure described here facilitates the high level production of recombinant glucagon with an extended biological activity.

Keywords

Recombinant Glucagon Peptide expression Heterologous system Enterokinase GST tag Biological activity

Introduction

The development of recombinant proteins has been extremely promising. In 2009, pharmaceutical industries spent US$ 90 billion on the activity evaluation of 400 different drugs. Moreover, in 2012, more than 150 recombinant drugs were approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) regulators and/or by the European Medicine Agency (Huang et al. 2012). By 2017, it is expected that over 300 products will be in the biopharmaceutical market, with a value of about US$ 109 billion and an expected growth of US$ 166 billion (Ibarra Cabrera et al. 2013). Worldwide expenses related to drugs could reach US$ 1.3 trillion in 2018, especially due to new treatments for hepatitis C and cancer (Chen, 2014).

According to the World Health Organization, one third of the world’s population has no regular access to essential medicines (Nowbike 2006; Blatt et al. 2012). In Brazil, the Government provides free, high-cost drugs to the population, which are classified into three different categories: basic, strategic and specialised. The specialised components are expensive, which limits access of the population to important medicines. Hence, in 1993, the Program for Specialized Medicaments (SM) became a prospective solution to this problem. However, most of these medicines are imported from other countries, resulting in a large cost to the Brazilian government. Moreover, the expectation is that the amount spent on the importation of SM will continue to grow over the next several years.

In 2009, US$ 884 million was spent on specialised drugs, which is four times the amount (US$ 198 million) spent in 2003 (Valadares 2009). In 2013, US$ 1.61 billion was spent, and in 2014, preliminary data were provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health showing US$ 1.5 billion for the purchase of SM (Brazil Ministry Health, 2014). Therefore, to reduce high costs associated with imported pharmaceutical products, the Brazilian government released the Technological Innovation Law, which stimulates the development of new biotechnological companies for the production of national biopharmaceuticals (Brazil Ministry Health 2008; de Castro 2014). The Technological Innovation Law is part of a strategic plan to strengthen the pharmaceutical industry, due the increased demand for health public services and consumption (medicines, diagnostics kits, vaccines, etc.). The strategy aimed to replace the imported drugs that were causing a significant impact on the economy and encourage scientific training and public–private partnerships (Victora et al. 2011; Silveira 2012; Reddy 2013; Sundfeld and Souza 2013). In 2012, 34 public–private partnerships were developed to produce several molecules with therapeutic activity, such as anti-retroviral and anti-asthmatic drugs and drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn and Gaucher diseases, among others (Paiva 2012). In 2013, 63 public-private partnerships were developed, resulting in the production of 63 drugs, vaccines and rapid diagnostic tests, involving 16 public and 41 private laboratories, with an estimated US$ 2.8 billion per year in budget savings (Oliveira 2013). Alongside Brazil, other countries, such as South Korea and India, also used national biosimilar production as an alternative to increase the access of high-cost biopharmaceuticals to the population (IMS 2011) through similar biotechnology. Furthermore, the large accumulation of expired patents related to biopharmaceutical products led to the development of a second generation of drugs: biosimilars (Niederwieser and Schmitz 2010; Utzig et al. 2010). The substitution of classic drugs with biosimilars depends on the criteria established by each country (Rosenberg et al. 2010).

The glucagon peptide could be used in diagnostics tests or for the treatment of alcoholic coma, biliary tract pain, hypoglycaemia (as a bronchodilator), etc. (Guimarães et al. 2011). Furthermore, glucagon has been on the Brazilian SM Program list since 2008. Currently, glucagon is imported from other countries, and initial production of new substances is restricted to universities and research centres (Massi et al. 2013). The main activity of glucagon involves the primary regulation of glucose production in the liver in situations of fasting, exercise and hypoglycaemia (Ramnanan et al. 2011). Hancock and colleagues (2010) indicated that the main glucagon activity was associated with glycemic control in fasting and postprandial situations. Therefore, glucagon utilisation is important since this hormone shows a fundamental role in glycemic control and, consequently, the maintenance of homeostasis.

In this work, the glucagon peptide was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli cells using the pGEX vector system. An efficient purification procedure at the laboratory scale for a biologically active Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-glucagon fusion molecule was also performed. The biological activity of the biosimilar molecule was evaluated in in vivo tests, showing a prolonged activity when compared with the control (Glucagen NovoNordisk®). This study is the first report in which glucagon is efficiently produced in Brazil using a bacterial system, showing advanced biological activity in in vivo assays.

Materials and methods

Materials

Glucagon PCR primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) and the FUSION Taq High-Fidelity enzyme was purchased from Finnzymes, Thermo Scientific (Vantaa, Finland). The glucagon expression vector pGEX4t-3 and the Glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow resin were purchased from GE Healthcare (Inc, Sweden). E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Invitrogen) were kindly provided by Embrapa Cenargen, Brazil. The expression inductor Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was acquired from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA., USA). Glucagen®, used as positive control, was obtained from Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark). Polyclonal anti-glucagon antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA., USA).

Cloning of the human glucagon gene

The nucleotide sequence of human glucagon (GenBank GI 30582464), containing 128 bp, was cloned into the synthetic vector pGEX4t-3 (GE Healthcare). The glucagon coding sequence was then amplified using designed primers containing a Sal I site (forward - 5’ GGG GGT CGA CGA TTA CAA AGA TGA TGA TG 3’), a Not I site (reverse – 5’ TTT TGC GGC CGC TCA GGT GTT CAT CAG CCA C 3’) and a cleavage site for the FLAG tag. The amplicon was purified, and a recombination reaction was performed to clone the glucagon fragment into the pGEX4-t3 expression vector (GE Healthcare). The recombinant plasmid was used to transform E. coli XLI-Blue cells via electroporation, and transformed cells were initially selected using LB (Luria and Bertani) agar plates [1% (w/v) tryptone, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, 0.5% (w/v) sodium chloride, and 1.5% (w/v) agar, supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin, pH 7.0].

Recombinant glucagon expression

The construct was inserted into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells through thermal shock. To evaluate the glucagon expression profile, a single colony was inoculated into 10 mL of LB medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and grown overnight at 37°C (200 rpm). The seed culture was inoculated into 1 L (Litre) of LB medium supplemented with ampicillin, and cells were grown at 30°C during 2 hours. The expression induction was carried out by the addition of IPTG (Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranosid; 0.25 mM). After 4 hours of induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation (1680 g for 5 min at 25°C). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 1X sample buffer [10% glycerol (w/v), 2-10% mercaptoethanol (v/v), 2.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate (w/v), 124 mM Tris-Base, 0.01% bromophenol blue (w/v)] and boiled for 5 min. After that, soluble and insoluble proteins were separated by centrifugation (13171 g for 5 min), and protein molecular masses were analysed by Coomassie-blue stained, 12.5% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gels (Sambrook and Russell 2006). Glucagon expression levels were determined by densitometry using the ImageScannerIII (GE Healthcare Inc., Sweden) and ImageMaster2D Plattinum 7.02 and LabScan 6.0 (GE Healthcare Inc., Sweden) software for data analyses.

Bioreactor glucagon expression was performed. Larger lab-scale peptide production was obtained using the Wave Bioreactor™ 20/50 EHT system (GE Healthcare, Brazil). A series of parameters were adjusted to optimise glucagon expression in the Wave Bioreactor, such as the swing angle (30°), speed (30 rpm), temperature (30°C) and airflow (0.1 ppm for 30 seconds every 1 hour). Peptide expression was induced with the addition of IPTG (0.25 mM), and cells were harvested after 4 hours.

Glucagon purification

Recombinant glucagon was purified by Glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare Inc., Sweden) affinity chromatography according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified samples were dialysed overnight in a tube with a cut off of 12000–14000 kDa (Cheshire Sciences, UK), lyophilised and stored at −20°C for quantification. Each sample concentration was previously estimated using Qubit methodology (Invitrogen, USA). Quantified samples were used for the digestion procedure with enterokinase.

Western blot assays

Purified GST-FLAG-Glucagon and non-purified protein concentrations were estimated using the Bradford method (1976). Protein molecular mass was estimated as previously described. Glucagon was detected using the polyclonal anti-glucagon antibody (Santa Cruz, CA., USA) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-goat IgG (GE Healthcare Inc., Sweden). The Alkaline Phosphatase Conjugate Substrate Kit (BioRad, CA., USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cleavage of the fusion protein

The cleavage reaction for the fusion protein was performed using the enzyme enterokinase EKMax (Invitrogen, USA) at a concentration of 1 U per 20 μg of purified recombinant peptide and incubated at 22°C overnight. A 7-16% Tris-Tricine gel (Schangger 2006) was used to analyse the cleavage reaction.

Protein sequencing

After cleavage, the GST-FLAG and Glucagon proteins were diluted in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and purified by reverse-phase ultra fast high performance liquid chromatography (RP-UFLC) (RP-UFLC LC-20 AD/T LPGE kit, Shimadzu Corporation Kyoto, Japan) using a Vydac C-18TP column. Retained proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile (0-100%). Samples were then subjected to speed-vac concentration, and major fractions were mixed with a saturated matrix solution of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (1:3) and spotted (0.5 μl) onto an MTP AnchoChip var/384 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI) target plate. The monoisotopic molecular mass of glucagon was determined by MALDI-time of flight TOF/MS tandem mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) using an AutoFlex Speed (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) controlled by the FlexControl 3.0 software. The MS spectra were acquired in the positive ion reflector mode at a laser frequency of 100 Hz, and the MS/MS spectra were obtained by LIFTTM mode, both with external calibration using the peptide calibration standard I (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Data were analysed using the Flex-Analysis 3.0 software.

In vivo bioassays

In vivo bioassays were performed following the methodology described by Hinke et al. (2000) with modifications. Briefly, recombinant glucagon (7.1 nmol/kg), commercial glucagon (positive control) and dH2O (negative control) were injected into three groups of five male Wistar rats, respectively. After administration, glucose levels were monitored at 0, 10, 20 and 40 minutes. The differences in glucose levels (differences between 10, 20 or 40 minutes and the baseline time) over time were calculated and evaluated. When the recombinant glucagon was used, the blood glucose level was maintained at a 1.3-fold increased level 40 minutes after injection, whereas it decreased to similar levels as the negative control after 40 minutes when the commercial glucagon was used. The biological test was repeated three times.

In this study, to biological assay the initial samples contained recombinant glucagon with a FLAG-GST tag. The fusion between FLAG-GST and recombinant glucagon was removed from digestion with enterokinase. After this step, samples were evaluated for in vivo biological activity. The FLAG-GST tag and recombinant glucagon were in the same sample to in vivo biological activity, but not were fusioned.

The study was previously approved by the Pioneer Union for Social Insertion – UPIS Committee for Ethical Use of Animals (CEUA), and the proposal (#071-11) entitled “Biological activity evaluation of recombinant peptide glucagon” was approved on August 12, 2011. Therefore, the reported experimental procedures comply with ethical procedures for animal use in in vivo experiments (Ellery 1985).

Statistical analyses were based on the generalised linear mixed model test (R Development Core Team 2010) and were used to validate the differences between values obtained by the different groups. In addition, analyses were performed to assign a fold-difference value comparing the increased glycemic levels seen at 10, 20 and 40 minutes with the basal levels, considering the random variation of rats. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. R statistical packages were used to validate the data.

Results

Glucagon expression and purification

After expression, it was observed that 40 to 50% of total soluble product corresponded to the glucagon peptide, which, including the GST fusion protein, presented a molecular mass of 31.44 kDa (Figure 1A; Additional file 1: Figure S1). After purification using affinity chromatography, densitometry analyses indicated that the GST-glucagon corresponded to 90% of the purified product. Western blotting assays using both anti-GST and anti-glucagon antibodies confirmed the presence of the GST-fused glucagon (Figure 1B). Later, the cleavage of glucagon from the GST fusion protein using the enterokinase enzyme produced a 3.5 kDa-peptide, as revealed by a 16% Tris-tricine gel (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Recombinant glucagon peptide expression profiling and analysis. (A) Glucagon expression after different incubation times. Upper lane: protein expression using 1 L of culture media; Lower lane: protein expression in the bioreactor (5 L). Lane 1: BenchMark Protein Ladder (Invitrogen); Lanes 2 to 9 indicate expression protein patterns after 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h and overnight incubation, respectively. (B) Western blotting of glucagon using anti-glucagon antibodies. Lane 1: Pre-Stained Protein Ladder (Invitrogen); Lane 2: purified GST protein (3 μg); Lane 3 purified non-digested glucagon fused with the GST protein (3 μg) arrows indicate recombinant glucagon fused with GST protein. (C) Glucagon digestion to separate the peptide from the GST tag in Tris-Tricine gel. Lane 1: Seeblue Plus2 Pre Stained Standard (Invitrogen); Lane 2: purified non-digested glucagon fused with the GST protein (5 μg); Lane 3: Pre-Stained Protein Ladder (Invitrogen); Lane 4: commercial glucagon (Glucagen, NovoNordisk, 5 μg); Lane 5: digested glucagon (40 μg total digestion).

Amino acid sequencing of glucagon

After hydrolysis, the glucagon peptide was purified using UFLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography), and fractions were collected. The ion corresponding to the peptide was present in a fraction that eluted at 26 minutes of separation, and it was further detected by MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation Time-of-Flight) MS (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Hence, 16 amino acid residues from the N-terminus of glucagon (H-S-Q-G-T-F-T-S-d-Y-S-K-Y-l-d-S) were determined by de novo sequencing, indicating that the predicted digestion was performed as expected.

In vivo bioassays

GST-Glucagon activity was evaluated by measuring glycemic levels in rats before and after exposure to the glucagon molecule. Both the recombinant peptide and the commercially available glucagon (NovoNordisk®) induced a similar blood glucose peak right after injection. Nevertheless, the recombinant glucagon maintained blood glucose levels at a 1.3-fold increased level 40 minutes after injection, whereas commercial glucagon decreased to the same levels of negative control after 40 minutes (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Statistical analyses demonstrated that the differential time profile of glucose levels between the recombinant glucagon and the commercial glucagon was significant (Figure 2A-C).
Figure 2

Statistical model analysis of the biological activity test based on glucose levels during specific times after of samples administration. (A) Negative control. (B) Positive control. (C) Recombinant glucagon. p > 0,00001.

Glucagon expression using the WAVE Bioreactor

To evaluate the expression level of recombinant glucagon at a higher scale with controlled conditions, the WAVE bioreactor (GE Healthcare) was used at a scale up of 5 L (Figure 1A, lower lane). After expression and purification, the final yield of recombinant glucagon in the bioreactor reached 7 mg/L.

Discussion

Among the seven emerging countries in the biopharmaceutical market (Russia, China, Turkey, Mexico, South Korea, India and Brazil), a growth from US$ 5.3 billion in 2010 to US$ 13.6 billion in 2015 is estimated (International Market Analysis Research & Consulting, 2010). Biosimilar sales are expected to reach between US$ 1.9 - 2.6 billion (IMS 2011) in 2015. In 2016, the medicines market will spend US$ 1.2 trillion, most of which are expenses focused on cancer, diabetes and asthma drugs (IMS Institute 2012).

The cost of drugs used for diabetes treatment (insulin, glucagon, and others) reached US$ 548 billion in 2013. In the United States, it is estimated that the diabetes drug market will expand by about US$ 125 million (Biodel 2013; Hassan et al. 2014). Statistical data suggest a worldwide growth from 382 million diabetic people in 2013 to 592 billion people in 2035 (Ledford 2013; Guariguata et al. 2014). There is an estimated 200.000 people/year that are hospitalised due to severe hypoglycaemia, and only 20% of this number use the glucagon emergency kit. One of the main causes for the lack of access to the kit is the elevated price (Biodel 2013). The first glucagon recombinant regimen was created by the NovoNordisk® Company in 1989 using a yeast heterologous system (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (patent n°4.826.763). In 1994, the Eli Lilly® Company used an E. coli heterologous system to produce recombinant glucagon (patent n°5.512.549). Today, recombinant glucagon is expressed in many countries for high scale production purposes, mainly own production (Agarwal et al. 2014) and such that is reported by When and colleagues (2001).

The glucagon production reached 40 to 50% of the total protein expression, with concentrations slightly above the 39% reported by Ohana and colleagues (2011), which evaluated different protein expression yields with differential tag systems. The tac promoter (de Boer et al. 1983) used in the expression vector contributed to the high level of glucagon production. It is already known that the tac promoter is strong and one of the most widely used in research and industry (Huang et al. 2012).

Bioreactors have been used in the recombinant peptide industry for more than a decade, mainly due to the flexibility of use reducing costs, labour and contaminations. However, the major limitations are the amount of oxygen used during expression and the low refrigeration capacity (Dreher et al. 2014). An initial peptide expression in bioreactors was also performed using up to 5 L of culture media. The ultimate goal of establishing a methodology for producing biopharmaceuticals is scale-up. Hence, the expression yielded 122 mg of semi-purified peptide, a 3.4-fold increase compared with the expected value observed earlier for the 1 L expression. This result suggested that the expression of glucagon in bioreactors using bacterial cells might provide better conditions for peptide production, indicating that the methodology used can easily be applied at industrial levels.

It is estimated that 77% of E. coli expression proteins are insoluble (Cuozzo and Soutter 2014). However, some studies showed high levels of soluble peptide production when fused with tag proteins, such as Thioredoxin (Trx) and GST (Gao et al. 2010). Hence, the glucagon peptide was expressed in the soluble phase partly due to the addition of a GST tag. At the end of the process, achieving satisfactory amounts of protein does not mean success (Rosano and Ceccarelli 2014). It is necessary to evaluate the biological activity to validate the process (Nausch et al. 2013). Here, we demonstrate that the recombinant GST-glucagon displayed high glycemic levels for a longer period of time than the commercial glucagon. For a biosimilar, it was expected that recombinant glucagon here produced and the positive control (commercial glucagon) should demonstrate similar glucose levels during the evaluated time, which was not observed in this study.

The analysis of recombinant proteins fused with GST in biological assays has been earlier described, with no interference of the targeted protein's activity. Recently, two antitumoral proteins, granzyme B (GrB) and perforin (PFP), earlier known by their ability to inhibit cell viability, were cloned into the pGEX-4 T-1 vector and expressed in bacterial systems. The fusion proteins GST-GrB and GST-PFP were later challenged against Hep-2 cells, showing significant decreases in laryngeal cancer cell growth (Li et al. 2014). Using GST as a control, the assay also demonstrated the inability of the fusion protein to interfere with recombinant protein activities.

Therefore, the application of bacterial systems for the expression of human peptides fused with GST proteins is becoming a promising strategy in the production of recombinant molecules with potential for biopharmaceutical products. A previous report showed that a recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue (KGLP-1), also used on diabetes therapy, was expressed in E. coli cells as a fusion protein with GST (Liu et al. 2014). In this study, digestion reactions were performed to remove GST from glucagon and confirmed by Tris-Tricine gel (Figure 1C). Furthermore, in biological activity, the recombinant glucagon in the presence of GST tag, but not fused to it, showed prolonged high glycemic levels when compared with the positive control (Glucagen® NovoNordisk). The removal of tags from recombinant proteins is also critical, as it may interfere with the shape and activity of the protein of interest. Moreover, recombinant proteins with permanent tags are not allowed by the standards of therapeutic proteins (Walls et al. 2011; Einsfrldt et al. 2011). Therefore, the GST tag was removed from the fusion with the peptide glucagon using enterokinase. According to Hosfield and Lu (1999), enterokinase presents a cleavage efficiency, when the first amino acid residue of a protein fused with flag-tag is histidine, which is the case of recombinant glucagon, the cleavage efficiency of enterokinase is 74%. Moreover, according to Kahn (2009), of the 29 amino residues, the first amino acids close to the N-terminal portion are essential for biological activity, mainly histidine (position 1), asparagine (position 9) and serine (position 16). If glucagon was fused to GST, the histidine amino acid could not be connected to the glucagon receptor, and the biological activity would be partially impaired, which was not observed here.

All patents of technologies used in this work (Table 1) were deposited in 1997. Thereby, the patents expire in 2017, allowing the use of this protocol to obtain recombinant glucagon. The estimated value spent (Table 2, Additional file 4: Table S1) per mg of recombinant glucagon in this work was US$ 175.28. However, this value can be reduced to US$ 22.10 (see Table 2). In Brazil, the commercial value of recombinant glucagon is US$ 56.60, 2.5 times more expensive than recombinant glucagon. This value can be changed because the recombinant glucagon was semi-purified and total purification can increase the value.
Table 1

Technologies used in the process to obtain recombinant glucagon and respective patents

Technology

Patent number

Patent year

Patent expiration

pGEX4t-3 t vector

US 5654176

1997

2017

GST Tag

US 5654176

1997

2017

FLAG Tag

US 4703004

1987

2007

BL21(DE3) strain

US 5693489

1997

2017

Enterokinase Enzyme

US 5665566

1997

2017

Glutathione Sepharore Resin

US 5654176

1997

2017

Glucagen®

US 5652216

1997*

2017

*The first patent filed was in 1989. This is an evergreening patent, a type of patent with novel technology is added to previous one. Basso (2012)

Table 2

Products used for recombinant glucagon expression and respective costs for 1 litre expression

Product

Price (US$)

Amount used

Final price spent (US$)

Ampicillin

134.33

100 mg

2.68

Benzamidine

207.92

180.225 mg

7.49

Enterokinase 1

781.50

1U/20 μg fusioned protein

1094.11*

Enterokinase 2

781.50

1U/1 mg fusion protein

21.87*

Yeast extract

56.60

5 g

1.14

Reduced glutathione

6135.00

3.07 g

14.21

IPTG

86.03

59.57 mg

5.12

KCl

47.54

3 mg

0.0002

KH2PO4

107.54

3.67 mg

0.007

NaCl

47.54

5.12 g

0.97

Na2HPO4

125.29

21.29 mg

0.005

PMSF

181.13

261.29 mg

9.46

Tips

16.98

15 units

0.25

Glutathione Sepharose

1864.90

4 mL

74.59

Tryptone

128.31

10 g

5.14

TrisHCl

93.59

6.05 g

2.26

Water, equipment and others

  

9.53

Total with enterokinase 1

  

1226.96 (**/7 = 175.28)

Total with enterokinase 2

  

157.72 (**/7 = 20.10)

Prices obtained from the companies Invitrogen, GE and Sigma. *Value may change depending on the concentration used for digestion. In this work, we used manufacturer’s instructions (1U/20 μg), but literature reports (Ehrhardt et al. 2000; SUN et al. 2011) indicate 1U/mg recombinant protein to digestion. Thereby, this concentration was used to calculate this value in this condition. **Total value divided by 7, the recombinant protein total obtained in the 1 litre expression (7 mg in 1 litre) to indicate the value for 1 mg. Basso (2012)

In this work, the glucagon peptide was expressed in a soluble form using a pGEX vector in a bacterial system, yielding a high concentration of the purified product. Moreover, the recombinant glucagon showed a differentiated activity on glycemic levels when compared with the positive control, in the presence but not fused to the GST-tag. Further studies aimed to better understand the cause of this extended effect on glycemic levels and the role of GST are being performed.

Many recombinant biopharmaceuticals have been developed for use in biotechnology. However, after the expiration of several pharmaceutical patents, a variety of biosimilars have been produced. Some strategies are emerging for protein production at a large-scale to obtain higher levels of expression. Hence, in this report, we describe, for the first time, the production of the biosimilar glucagon hormone in a heterologous system by a Brazilian research group. Moreover, an improved expression and purification of the peptide is reported, which could support, in the future, the treatment of patients with several different diseases and will decrease Brazilian importation costs with medicaments. Furthermore, local production of the biosimilar glucagon will stimulate the development of national pharmaceutical industries. The peptide in the presence of GST, but not fused, showed a prolonged activity when compared with the positive control. This differential activity may be beneficial because it reduces the discomfort caused by the increase and decrease of glucose levels after commercial drug administration. However, further studies will indicate potential adverse effects of recombinant glucagon.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Gerard Murray for his contribution reading the manuscript. This study was supported by grants from the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), the National Council for Science and Technology (CNPq) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Pathology, University of Brasilia
(2)
Laboratory of Plant-Pest Interaction, Embrapa – Genetic Resources and Biotechnology
(3)
Pioneer Union for Social Insertion – UPIS
(4)
Catholic University of Brasilia
(5)
Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Embrapa – Genetic Resources and Biotechnology

References

  1. Agarwal DR, Chyung D, Carson BB, Yi L, Makaroun L, Kishore S, Reidenberg MM (2014) Application to add glucagon to the model list of essential medicines. http://www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/expert/18/applications/Glucagon.pdf?ua=1. Acessed: 30 sept 2014
  2. Basso AMM (2012) Recombinant glucagon production: expression, purification and biological activity evaluation. Dissertation, University of BrasiliaGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatt CR, Silvana CT, Schmidt EH, Marchesan S, Silva LM, Martins JL (2012) General awareness and use of generic medication among citizens of Tubarão, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Ciênc saúde coletiva 17:79–87, doi:10.1590/S1413-81232012000100011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Biodel (2013). Life sciences management access conference. http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/BIOD/0x0x684784/656e78a5-c336-4ad1-b985-dcbc7fdbf6a7/Biodel_at_Wedbush_Conference_13Aug_13_-_FINAL.pdf. Acessed: 18 junh 2014
  5. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–54, doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brazil Ministery of Healthy (2008) National politics for science and technology innovation in health (in Portuguese). http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/Politica_Portugues.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2014
  7. Brazil Ministery of Healthy (2014) http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2014/dezembro/16/livro-2-completo-para-site.pdf. Acessed 30 Dez 2014
  8. Chen C (2014) World’s drug bill will reach $1.3 trillion in 2018: study. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-20/world-s-drug-bill-will-reach-1-3-billion-in-2018-study.html. Acessed: 30 dez 2014.
  9. Cuozzo JW, Soutter HH (2014) Overview of recent progress in protein-expression technologies for small molecule screening. J Biomol Screen on line version p.1-14. doi:0.1177/1087057114520975Google Scholar
  10. De Boer HA, Comstock LJ, Vasser M (1983) The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 80(1):21–25. http://www.pnas.org/content/80/1/21.long
  11. De Castro LAB (2014) Brazilian biotechnology network – the challenge to innovate in biotechnology in Brazil. BCM Proced 8(suppl 4):O40, doi:10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-O40Google Scholar
  12. Dreher T, Walcarius B, Husemann U, Klingenberg F, Zahnow C, Adams T, Wilde D, Casteels P, Greller G (2014) Microbial high cell density fermentations in a stirred single-use bioreactor. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 138:127–47, doi:10.1007/10_2013_189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrhardt RA, Slepetis RM, Siegal-Willott J, Van Amburgh ME, Bell AW, Boidclair YR (2000) Development of a specific radioimmunoassay to measure physiological changes of circulating lepting in cattle and sheep. J Endocrinol 166:519–28View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Einsfrldt K, Severo-Junior JB, Correa AAP, Medeiros MA, Alves TL, Almeida RV, Larentis AL (2011) Cloning and expression of protease ClpP from Streptococcus pneumoniae in Escherichia coli: Study of influence of kanamycin and IPTG concentration on cell grown, recombinant protein production and plasmid stability. Vaccine 29:7136–43, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.073View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellery AW (1985) Guidelines for specification of animals and husbandry methods when reporting the results of animal experiments. Working committee for the biological characterization of laboratory animals/GV-solas. Lab Anim 19:106–8, doi:10.1258/0023677857809422714View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao M, Chen M, Liu W, Zhu J, Tian H, Gao X, Yao W (2010) Production and purification of an analog of glucagon-like peptide-1 by autoinduction and on-column cleavage in Escherichia coli. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1675–82, doi:10.1007/s11274-010-0345-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE (2014) Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 103:137–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002
  18. Guimarães HP, Lopes RD, Lopes AC (2011) Treaty of urgent and emergency medicine: emergency room and UTI. Atheneu, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancock AS, Du A, Liu J, Miller M, May CL (2010) Glucagon deficiency recues hepatic glucose production and improves glucose tolerance in adult mice. Mol Endocrinol 4(8):1605–14, doi:10.1210/me.2010-0120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassan A, Meo SA, Usmani AM, Shaikh TJ (2014) Diabetes during Ramadan – Pre-approach model: presentation, risk stratification, education. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:1798–1805. http://www.europeanreview.org/article/7534
  21. Hinke SA, Pospisilik JA, Demuth HU, Mannhart S, Kuhn-Wache K, Hoffmann T, Nishimura E, Pederson RA, Mclntosh HS (2000) Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPIV/CD26) degradation of glucagon. J Biol Chem 275:3827–34, doi:10.1074/jbc.275.6.3827View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang CJ, Lin H, Yang X (2012) Industrial production of recombinante therapeutics in Escherichia coli and its recent advancements. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:383–99, doi:10.1007/s10295-011-1082-9Google Scholar
  23. Hosfield T, Lu Q (1999) Influence of the amino acid residue downstream of (Asp)4Lys on enterokinase cleavage of a fusion protein. Anal Biochem 269:10–6, doi:10.1006/abio.1998.3084View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ibarra-Cabrera R, Mena-Pérez SC, Bondani-Guasti A, Garcia-Arrazola R (2013) Review on the worldwide regulatory framework for bisimilar focusing on the Mexican case as an emerging in Latin America. Biotechnol Adv 31:1333–43, doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.05.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. IMS – Institute for Healthcare Informatics (2012) The Global Use of Medicines: Outlook through 2016., http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/ims/Global/Content/Insights/IMS%20Institute%20for%20Healthcare%20Informatics/Global%20Use%20of%20Meds%202011/Medicines_Outlook_Through_2016_Report.pdf. Accessed: 06 May 2014Google Scholar
  26. IMS – Institute for Healthcare Informatics (2013) The Global Use of Medicines: Outlook through 2017., http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/Corporate/IMS%20Health%20Institute/Reports/Global_Use_of_Meds_Outlook_2017/IIHI_Global_Use_of_Meds_Report_2013.pdf Accessed 13Set 2014
  27. International Market Analysis Research & Consulting (2010) http://www.bioseeker.com/market-research-report/factsheet-pdf/world-pharmaceutical-and-biopharmaceutical-market-2010-2015-pipeline-analysis-of-the-top-50-companies.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2014
  28. Kahn CR (2009) Joslin’s Diabetes Melitus. Artmed, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  29. Ledford H (2013) Diabetes drug ride a bumpy road. Nat 504:198, doi:10.1038/504198aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li X, Zhang G, An G, Liu S, Lai Y (2014) Expression, purification and anticancer analysis of GST-tagged human perforin and granzyme B proteins in human laryngeal cancer Hep-2 cells. Prot Exp Purif 95:38–43, doi:10.1016/j.pep.2013.11.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu Y, Ren L, Ge L, Cui Q, Cao X, Hou Y, Bai F, Bai G (2014) A strategy for fusion expression and preparation of functional glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue by introducing an enterokinase cleavage site. Biotechnol Lett 36:1675–8, doi:10.1007/s10529-014-1526-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Massi L, Cerrutti BM, Queiroz SL (2013) Methodology Jigsaw in discipline of medicinal chemistry. (in Portuguese) Quím Nova 36:897904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422013000600028
  33. Nausch H, Huckauf J, Koslowski R, Meyer U, Broer I, Mikschofsky (2013) Recombinant Production of Human Interleukin 6 in Escherichia coli. PLOS ONE 8 (1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054933Google Scholar
  34. Niederwieser N, Schmitz S (2010) Biosimilar agents in oncology/hematology: from approval to practice. Eur J Haematolol 86:277–88, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01566.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Nwobike JC (2006) Pharmaceutical corporations and access to drugs in developing countries: the way forward. Sur, Rev int direitos human 3:126–43, doi:10.1590/S1806-64452006000100008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ohana RF, Hurst R, Vidugiriene J, Slater MR, Wood K, Urh M (2011) HaloTag-based purification of functional human kinases from mammalian cells. Protein Expr Purif 76:154–64, doi:10.1016/j.pep.2010.11.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliveira EJV (2013) Heath ministry actions for promotion of national production. (in Portuguese) http://www.cimes.org.br/uploads/paginas/file/palestras/Eduardo%20Oliveira%20-%20SCTIE%20-%20Fomento%20%C3%A0%20Produ%C3%A7%C3%A3o.pdf. Accessed: 02 Nov 2014
  38. Paiva, LB (2012) Health technology innovation and productive industrial complex in Brasil. (in Portuguese) http://www.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/instituto-de-saude/homepage/pdfs/seminario-de-inovacao-material/dr._leonardo_paiva.pdf?attach=true. Accessed: 02 Nov 2014
  39. R Development Core Team (2010) (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-01-0. URLGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramnanan CJ, Edgerton DS, Kraft G, Cherrington AD (2011) Physiologic action of glucagon in liver glucose metabolism. Diabetes Obes Metab 13(1):118–25, doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01454.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Reddy, GB (2013) Local working of patents – law and implementation in India. JIPR 18:15–27. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/15742
  42. Rosano G, Ceccarelli EA (2014) Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol v 5:1–17, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172Google Scholar
  43. Rosenberg G, Fonseca MGD, D’avila LA (2010) Comparative analysis of the industrial concentration and turnover of pharmaceutical industry in Brazil for the segments of brand and generic medications (in Portuguese) Econ Soc 19:107–134. doi:10.1590/S0104-06182010000100005 Google Scholar
  44. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2006) The condensed protocols. From molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Schangger H (2006) Tricine –SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc 1:16–22, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Silveira, E (2012) Nanoscale drugs (in portuguese). FAPESP. 201:76–79. http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/2013/01/18/medicine-in-nanoscale/. Acessed 02 Nov 2014.
  47. Sun YL, Lin Y, Lin CS (2011) Soluble fusion expression and production of rabbit neutrophil peptide-1 in Escherichia coli. Rom Biotech Lett 16:6618–6629. http://www.rombio.eu/rbl5vol16/19%20Chih%20Seng%20Lin.pdf ISSN 1224–5984
  48. Sundfeld CA, Souza RP (2013) Public-private partnerships for the development of medicines and the bidding process in Brazil. (in Portuguese) RDA 24:91–133 http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rda/article/viewFile/14078/12945 Accessed: 02 Nov 2014
  49. Utzig MFK, Virtuoso S, Oliveira SMM (2010) Verification of the adhesion of a community to generic medicines after seven years of implantation of the law. (in Portuguese) Visão Acad 10: 100–5. http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/academica/article/download/21339/14067. Accessed: 02 Nov 2014
  50. Valadares C (2009) Domensal. Bulletin of the Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Strategic Inputs. Department of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Health Ministry. (in Portuguese) Available: http://www.sinfarmig.org.br/UserFiles/File/dose%20mensal%203.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2014.
  51. Victora CG, Barreto ML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Schmidt MI, Paim J, Bastos FI, Almeida C, Bahia L, Travassos C, Reichenheim M, Barros FC (2011) Health conditions and health politics innovations in Brasil: way to go. (in Portuguese) Lancet Series 6:90–102. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60055-XGoogle Scholar
  52. Walls D, Mcgrath R, Loughran ST (2011) A digest of protein purification. Protein Chromatography: Methods and Protocols. Methods Mol Biol 681:3–23, doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-913-0_1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. When C, Wang Z, Du P, Gan R, Zhu S (2001) Secretion expression of recombinant glucagon in Escherichia coli. Sci China C Life Sci 44:233–40, doi:10.1007/BF02879330View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Basso et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.