Biosynthetic ability of diverse basidiomycetous yeast strains to produce the natural antioxidant ergothioneine

Abstract

Sixteen strains of basidiomycetous yeasts were evaluated for their capability to produce ergothioneine (EGT), an amino acid derivative with strong antioxidant activity. The cells were cultured in either two synthetic media or yeast mold (YM) medium for 72 h, after which cytosolic constituents were extracted from the cells with hot water. After analyzing the extracts via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we found that all strains produced varying amounts of EGT. The EGT-producing strains, including Ustilago siamensis, Anthracocystis floculossa, Tridiomyces crassus, Ustilago shanxiensis, and Moesziomyces antarcticus, were subjected to flask cultivation in YM medium. U. siamensis CBS9960 produced the highest amount of EGT at 49.5 ± 7.0 mg/L after 120 h, followed by T. crassus at 30.9 ± 1.8 mg/L. U. siamensis was also cultured in a jar fermenter and produced slightly higher amounts of EGT than under flask cultivation. The effects of culture conditions, particularly the addition of precursor amino acids, on EGT production by the selected strains were also evaluated. U. siamensis showed a 1.5-fold increase in EGT production with the addition of histidine, while U. shanxiensis experienced a 1.8-fold increase in EGT production with the addition of methionine. These results suggest that basidiomycetous yeasts could serve an abundant source for natural EGT producers.

Keypoints

Various basidiomycetous yeasts produced ergothioneine (EGT).

Ustilago siamensis possesses great capability of producing EGT.

Precursor amino acids promoted EGT production by U. siamensis and U. shanxiensis.

Introduction

Ergothioneine (EGT) is a naturally occurring l-histidine derivative, containing a betaine structure and a thiol group attached to an imidazole ring (see the chemical structure shown in Scheme 1). Its thiol-thione tautomerism and unique standard redox potential make it a highly stable antioxidant (Cheah and Halliwell 2012; Servillo et al. 2015; Borodina et al. 2020). EGT can scavenge free radicals and reactive oxygen species (Kimura et al. 2005; Stoffels et al. 2017) and reduce oxidative damage in mammals (Colognato et al. 2006; D’Onofrio et al. 2016). Furthermore, there is potential for EGT to prevent or treat neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases (Yang et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2020). These properties have led to increased academic interest in EGT, as well as its application in food and pharmaceutical industries, with dietary supplements and cosmetic products containing EGT already being commercialized (Fu and Shen 2022).

Scheme 1

Ergothioneine biosynthetic pathway in fungi. SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine

The first identified native EGT producer was the ergot fungus Claviceps purpurea, followed by various mycobacteria, cyanobacteria, ascomycetes, and basidiomycetes (Cheah and Halliwell 2012; Fu and Shen 2022). Mushrooms, many of which belongs to Basidiomycota, are the most popular EGT producers (Lin et al. 2015; Kalaras et al. 2015). However, due to the long cultivation time and low EGT content of mushroom fruiting bodies, alternative, safe, and cost-effective industrial processes are needed to meet the growing demand for EGT. Recent studies have demonstrated EGT production with less cultivation time by mycelial cultivation rather than fruiting bodies of mushrooms such as Lentinus edodes, Pleurotus eryngii, Pleurotus citrinopileatus, and Panus conchatus (Tepwong et al. 2012; Liang et al. 2013, 2015; Zhu et al. 2022). Another developing technique for the efficient production of EGT is to create novel EGT producers with genetic engineering technology. Model microorganisms such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae incapable of producing EGT originally have been genetically engineered to produce EGT for potential methods of industrial EGT production (Tanaka et al. 2019; van der Hoek et al. 2019; Hoek et al. 2022a, b). These studies demonstrated gram-scale EGT production by genetically modified microorganisms.

On the contrary, native EGT producers are yet to be fully explored for developing applications of EGT. Fujitani et al. (2018) investigated EGT production by methylotrophic bacteria as well as yeasts and fungi from NBRC RD strains and plants. They found that yeast strains producing EGT included Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and strains of Pseudozyma and Sporobolomyces species belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota. Strains of the subphylum Ustilaginomycotina, such as Ustilago and Pseudozyma strains, produce large amounts of glycolipid-type biosurfactants, such as mannosylerythritol lipids and cellobiose lipids (Morita et al. 2015). Our research group has been investigating the use of various basidiomycetous yeast strains to produce glycolipid-type biosurfactants as functional, sustainable materials (Morita et al. 2010, 2011, 2014; Saika et al. 2017, 2020), and many Pseudozyma strains, some of which inhabit phyllosphere, were identified as glycolipid producers. However, the production of other functional chemicals, including EGT, by these strains has not fully investigated. In this study, we screened for native EGT producers among various basidiomycetous yeast strains that have been investigated for the production of glycolipids. Multiple strains were found to produce EGT inside cells, and we examined cultivation conditions for selected strains to improve EGT production.

Materials and methods

Strains, media, and culture condition

The yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1 and were obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM; RIKEN, Ibaraki, Japan), the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelculues (CBS; The Westerdijk Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands), the Biological Resource Center (NBRC; National Institute of Technology and Evaluation, Chiba, Japan) and laboratory isolates (Konishi et al. 2007; Morita et al. 2010, 2011). Sixteen strains were screened for EGT production in test tube cultures using mineral medium (MM) (Alamgir et al. 2015; Fujitani et al. 2018); mineral salt (MS) medium composed of 50 g/L glucose, 3 g/L NaNO₃, 1 g/L yeast extract, 0.3 g/L KH₂PO₄, and 0.3 g/L MgSO₄·7H₂O; and yeast mold (YM) medium (Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Stock cells of the strains were first cultured on a YM agar plate at 25 °C, after which cells grown on the plates were transferred to test tubes containing respective media and shaken at 200 rpm and 25 °C.

Table 1 Preliminary examination of EGT-producing basidiomycetous yeast strains in test tube^a

To further evaluate EGT production, flask cultivation was performed in 300 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL YM medium, which were inoculated with 0.5 mL test tube YM medium cultures after 2 days of cultivation. The flasks were shaken at 25 °C and 200 rpm for 120 h. When necessary, filter-sterilized amino acid solution was added to the flasks at the beginning of the cultivation.

For jar fermenter experiments, cells of U. siamensis were cultured in two 50 mL of YM medium for 2 days, followed by inoculated into 2 L of YM medium in 5 L jar fermenter Bioneer·N-5 L (B. E. Marubishi Co. LTD., Tokyo, Japan). Operation of jar fermenter cultivation was conducted as follows: stirring speed at 400 rpm, cultivation temperature at 25 °C, air flow at 2 L/min (1 vvm). Aliquot of cultures were taken from the jar at appropriate point to analyze optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) and EGT production inside cells. After 120 h of operation, cells were harvested by centrifugation and dry cell weight were determined.

Analytical procedures

After cultivation, cells from approximately 1 mL culture were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 5 min to remove the culture media and washed once with deionized water. Obtained cell pellets were disrupted in 0.5 mL deionized water and heated at 96 °C for 10 min to extract cytosolic metabolites, including EGT. After cooling to room temperature, cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was diluted and subjected to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. The effluents were separated with a Shodex Asahipak NH2P-40 2D column (Shodex, Tokyo, Japan) and a NH2P-50G guard column (Shodex) at 40 °C that were connected to a Shimadzu LCMS-2020 system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a photodiodearray detector and an electrospray-ionization mass spectrometer (ESI-MS). A 30/70 (v/v) mixture of 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase at 0.1 mL/min. An ion mass spectrum (+) of 230.1 m/z was used to quantify EGT in the extracts. Authentic EGT (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to construct a calibration curve.

Cell growth was determined using the OD₆₀₀ of the culture medium or dry cell weight. The OD₆₀₀ was measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (V-630, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) after diluting the culture medium. Dry cell weight was measured by centrifuging the culture medium to harvest cells, followed by washing cells once with deionized water to remove the culture media. The obtained cell pellets were lyophilized to obtain dried cells and weighed to quantify dry cell weight.

Results

EGT production of basidiomycetous yeast strains

We first examined basidiomycetous yeast strains from culture collections for their ability to produce EGT in test tube cultures using three types of media. As shown in Table 1, MM medium containing glucose as a carbon source yielded only small amounts of EGT (1.3–4.6 mg/L) after 72 h cultivation. The same trend was observed in MS medium, which also contains glucose, with the highest amount of EGT (5.8 mg/L) produced by Triodiomyces crassus CBS9959. By contrast, many strains cultivated in YM medium increased their EGT production, with Ustilago siamensis CBS9960 producing the highest amount (40.1 mg/L), followed by Anthracocystis flocculosa (27.3 mg/L) and T. crassus (25.1 mg/L). Then we selected five strains for further examination of EGT biosynthesis in basidiomycetous yeasts, specifically three strains with high EGT production (U. siamensis CBS9960, T. crassus CBS9959, and A. flocculosa JCM10321), one strain with moderate EGT production (U. shanxiensis CBS10075), and one strain with low EGT production (Moesziomyces antarcticus JCM10317). These strains were cultivated in flasks containing YM medium, and their EGT production was evaluated (Fig. 1). U. siamensis CBS9960 and T. crassus CBS9959 produced EGT at 49.5 ± 7.0 and 30.9 ± 1.8 mg/L, respectively. A. flocculosa JCM10321 and U. shanxiensis CBS10075 produced EGT at around 20 mg/L, followed by M. antarcticus JCM10317 producing less EGT.

Fig. 1

EGT production by selected basidiomycetous yeast strains in flask cultivation. Cells were cultivated in YM medium at 25ºC for 120 h. Data are means and standard deviations from at least three replicates. Circles, dry cell weight; solid bars, EGT

EGT production of U. Siamensis in a jar fermenter

To further investigate the EGT production of U. siamensis CBS9960, the greatest EGT producer in the flask cultivation experiment, jar fermenter experiments were conducted. Using YM medium, U. siamensis grew within 24 h of cultivation, followed by a decrease in cell density (Fig. 2). EGT production only began after cell growth and was maintained with further culture time. At 120 h of cultivation, U. siamensis produced EGT at a titer of 54.0 ± 15.0 mg/L, which was slightly higher than that obtained from flask cultivation (see Fig. 1). This showed that U. siamensis can produce EGT on a larger scale, and further optimization of culture conditions is necessary to increase EGT productivity by this strain.

Fig. 2

Time-dependent changes of OD₆₀₀ and EGT production by U. siamensis using 5 L jar fermenter. Cells were cultivated in YM medium for 120 h (n = 11). Open circles, OD₆₀₀; closed circles, EGT

Effect of culture conditions for EGT production

To increase EGT production, the culture conditions, including medium components, temperature, aeration, salinity, and initial pH, were preliminarily investigated using three strains of U. siamensis (a high-level EGT producer), U. shanxiensis (a moderate-level EGT producer), and M. antarcticus (a low-level EGT producer). Increasing glucose concentration in YM medium did not result in an increase in EGT production by these strains (Supplemental Fig. S1), although the dry cell weight of all strains increased to 13.4–15.6 g/L. Addition of yeast extract, an amino acid source in YM medium, slightly increased EGT production in U. siamensis, although the other two strains showed a decrease in EGT production. Peptone, another amino acid source in YM medium, did not have a positive effect on EGT production. Other culture conditions, including cultivation temperature, aeration, salinity, and initial pH did not result in an increase in EGT production.

The amino acids cysteine, histidine, and methionine are the precursors in the EGT biosynthetic pathway (Pluskal et al. 2014; van der Hoek et al. 2022a; see Scheme 1) and thus adding yeast extract, an amino acid source in YM medium, could be promising to increase EGT production in U. siamensis. To determine the effect of precursors on EGT production in these strains, we evaluated adding precursor amino acids at 1 g/L to YM medium. All strains showed a decrease in dry cell weight and EGT production after adding 1 g/L cysteine (Fig. 3), likely caused by the toxic effect of external cysteine on the cells. After adding histidine, U. siamensis produced 1.5 times more EGT, whereas M. antarcticus and U. shanxiensis did not show a change in EGT production. By contrast, after adding methionine, U. shanxiensis produced 1.8 times more EGT, while the growth and EGT production of M. antarcticus and U. siamensis was unchanged (Fig. 3). These results suggest that histidine and methionine, precursor amino acids for EGT biosynthesis, promoted EGT production in Ustilago strains while the availability of precursor amino acids varied among the species.

Fig. 3

Effect of precursor amino acids on EGT production in (A) U. siamensis, (B) U. shanxiensis, and (C) M. antarcticus. Cells were cultivated in YM medium plus 1 g/L cysteine (CYS), histidine (HIS), or methionine (MET) for 120 h. Circles, dry cell weight; solid bars, EGT. Data are means and standard deviations from three replicates

Discussion

We found that various ustilaginomycetous yeast strains belonging to Basidiomycota were able to produce EGT. Production was greater in YM medium than in MM medium or MS medium. This is likely due to the fact that EGT is a histidine derivative, and its biosynthesis requires cysteine and S-adenosylmethionine (Pluskal et al. 2014; van der Hoek et al. 2022a; see Scheme 1). YM medium, which contains an abundance of amino acid sources such as peptone and yeast extract, is likely to support EGT production of ustilaginomycetous yeast strains.

Among the strains tested, U. siamensis was the highest EGT producer, producing 49.5 mg/L EGT in flask cultivation. U. siamensis showed a greater level of EGT production in culture medium, intracellular content, and productivity than other native EGT producers, except for mycelia cultivation of Pleurotus citrinopileatus and Panus conchatus under optimized conditions (Table 2). The production level of EGT by U. siamensis was further increased to 75 mg/L by boosting the precursor histidine, with the greatest EGT productivity (13.9 mg-EGT/g-dry cell) among native EGT producers. Because other ustilaginomycetous strains, such as M. antarcticus and P. tsukubaensis, have already been used for chemical production in commercial settings (Kitamoto 2019), ustilaginomycetous yeasts may be a viable candidate for large-scale production of EGT.

Table 2 EGT production by native producers

Recently, gram-scale production of EGT by submerged fed-batch cultivation was achieved through genetic modification of non-EGT producers. Recombinant E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and Yarrowia lipolytica expressing EGT biosynthetic genes from native EGT producers were able to biosynthesize EGT at 1.31 g/L in 216 h, 2.39 g/L in 160 h, and 1.63 g/L in 220 h, respectively (Tanaka et al. 2019; van der Hoek et al. 2022a, b). Supplementing precursor amino acids to the culture media supported high-level EGT production at 5.4 g/L in 96 h by fed-batch cultivation of the recombinant E. coli strain expressing mutants of EGT biosynthetic genes (Zhang et al. 2023). In addition, Corynebacterium glutamicum, a popular amino acid producer, was engineered for EGT production by introducing EGT biosynthetic genes and enhancing precursor amino acid biosynthesis, yielding 264.4 mg/L EGT (Kim et al. 2022). Genetic engineering technology for Ustilaginomycetes has already been developed for U. maydis and M. anarcticus (Olicon-Hernandez et al. 2019; Saika et al. 2017, 2020), and the genomes of multiple ustilaginomycetous strains have been analyzed to date (Kämper et al. 2006; Morita et al. 2014; Wada et al. 2021). Thus, the EGT-producing strains found in this study could also be improved to produce more EGT by introducing heterologous genes for EGT biosynthetic pathways and related metabolic reactions, as well as using self-cloning strategies to boost gene expression for EGT biosynthesis. Our trials of genetically modified ustilaginomycetous strains for enhanced EGT production are currently underway. It should be noted that native EGT producers may have greater tolerance and accumulation capacity than non-EGT producers due to their constant intercellular exposure to EGT. This property may be suitable for concentrating EGT from culture broths by collecting cells, depending on the downstream processes for EGT production.

To date, many biochemical and pharmacological applications of EGT have been explored (Cheah and Halliwell 2012; Borodina 2020). Although genetically modified microorganisms have demonstrated the production of large amounts of EGT, non-genetically modified microorganisms may be more suitable for food ingredients, cosmetic products, and toiletry products. In addition, the physiological role of EGT in native EGT producers has yet to be elucidated. The variety of basidiomycetous yeast strains capable of producing EGT could lead to the development of an industrial EGT production process by scaling-up fermentation and creating genetically modified strains, as well as to a better understanding of microbial EGT production and its physiological roles.