- Original article
- Open Access
Ursodeoxycholic acid production by Gibberella zeae mutants
AMB Express volume 12, Article number: 105 (2022)
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a highly demanded pharmaceutical steroid widely used in medicine. An ascomycete Gibberella zeae VKM F-2600 is capable of producing UDCA by 7β-hydroxylation of lithocholic acid (LCA). The present study is aimed at the improvement of the fungus productivity. The original procedures for the protoplast obtaining followed by UV mutagenesis and screening of ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones have been applied. The highest yield of G. zeae protoplasts was obtained when using the mycelium in the active growth phase, ammonium chloride as an osmotic stabilizer and treatment of the fungal cells by the lytic enzymes cocktail from Trichoderma hurzanium. The conditions for effective protoplast regeneration and the UV-mutagenesis were found to provide 6–12% survival rate of the protoplasts with superior number of possible mutations. Three of 27 ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones obtained have been selected due to their increased biocatalytic activity towards LCA. The mutant G. zeae M23 produced 26% more UDCA even at relatively high LCA concentration (4 g/L) as compared with parent fungal strain, and the conversion reached 88% (w/w). The yield of UDCA reached in this study prefers those ever reported. The results contribute to the knowledge on ascomycete mutagenesis, and are of importance for biotechnological production of value added cholic acids.
Efficient procedures for production and regeneration of Gibberella zeae protoplasts were determined.
Fungal mutants were obtained with elevated 7β-hydroxylase activity.
Mutant G. zeae M23 almost fully converts LCA (4 g/L) to UDCA.
Bile acids (BAs) are 3α-hydroxy 5β-steroids of 24 carbons. The number, position and stereochemistry of the hydroxyl groups in their steroid core determine their solubility, amphipathic properties, biochemical features and biological activity. In mammals, bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol and play an important role in digestion (Hofmann and Hagey 2008).
Ursodeoxycholic acid (3α,7β-dihydroxy-5β-cholanic acid, UDCA) belongs to the so-called secondary bile acids, and is formed from the primary acids such as cholic acid (CA) or chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) by intestinal bacteria (Prabha and Ohri 2006; Begley et al. 2005). UDCA (also known as ursodiol) occupies a special place among the bile acids due to its superior therapeutic properties. This active ingredient of the bear (“urso”) bile has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for more than 3000 years and was shown to possess anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory and anti-apoptotic properties (Abdulrab et al. 2020). Nowadays, UDCA is widely used in medicine for dissolving gallstones, treatment and prevention of cholestasis, sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis and liver cirrhosis and other diseases in gastroenterology and hepatology (Bortolini et al. 1997; Angulo et al. 1999; Ikegami and Matsuzaki 2008; Philipp 2011). It also exhibits protective effects against the colon cancer (Guzior and Quinn 2021). There is evidence of a beneficial effect of UDCA in the treatment of respiratory diseases (Işık et al. 2017).
Currently, industrial production of UDCA is based on a multi-stage, ecologically non-friendly chemical synthesis from CA isolated from cattle bile (Sawada et al. 1982). The synthesis requires several steps of protection and deprotection of the hydroxyl groups, and the overall UDCA yield does not exceed 30% (Tonin and Arends 2018).
An alternative approach includes microbial transformation or chemoenzymatic synthesis from CA, or CDCA (Tonin and Arends 2018; Wang et al. 2016). Using lithocholic acid (LCA) as a starting material for bioconversion (Fig. 1) provides a single-step UDCA production (Moriarty et al. 2014).
Filamentous fungi are well-known biocatalysts of regio- and stereospecific hydroxylation of androstane and pregnane steroids (Nassiri-Koopaei and Faramarzi 2015; Durairaj et al. 2016; Girvan and Munro 2016; Kristan and Riˇzner 2012), however their biocatalytic potential with respect to BAs is less studied. The strains of Rhizoctonia solani, Helicostilum piriforme, Cunninghamella blakesleeana and Curvularia lunata have been reported to oxyfunctionalize LCA mainly at positions C-12 and C-15 (Carlstroem et al. 1981; Hayakawa et al. 1980; Kulprecha et al. 1985). The 7β-hydroxylase activity towards LCA was described for Fusarium equizeti M-41 but the yield of UDCA was low even under optimized conditions (Sawada et al. 1982).
Previously, we have conducted a wide screening of filamentous fungi for their activity towards LCA and selected the strains of the genera Bipolaris, Gibberella, Cunninghamella, Cochliobolus and Fusarium with 7β-hydroxylase activity. Among them, the ascomycete Gibberella zeae VKM F-2600 (anamorph Fusarium graminearum) was chosen because of its superior potential, allowing up to 30% UDCA to be obtained from LCA (1 g/L) even under non-optimized conditions. Further optimization of the bioconversion conditions provided a threefold increase in the UDCA yield, but a lower bioconversion rate was observed at the elevated substrate concentrations (Kollerov et al. 2013).
Bioconversion enhancement is possible by fungal strain improvement that can be achieved by mutagenesis (Solis et al. 1996). The resistance to azole fungicide ketoconazole (inhibitor of cytochrome P 450 enzymes) is often used as a selective marker (Lu et al. 2007). A mutation in the gene encoding hydroxylase (CYP) enzyme synthesis can lead to its overexpression providing the resistance of fungal cells to ketoconazole (Lu et al. 2007; Wilmańska et al. 1992).
The main obstacle to successful mutagenesis of filamentous fungi is often low efficiency of the action of the mutagenic factors on fungal cells because of the complex structure of the cell wall and the multinuclear nature of filamentous fragments (Garcia-Rubio 2020). The use of protoplasts,—single mononuclear cells devoid of a cell wall and surrounded only by a cytoplasmic membrane, can facilitate genetic manipulation and mutagenesis of filamentous fungi and often plays a significant role in strain improvement (Roth and Chilvers 2019; Zhou et al. 2008). In turn, effective protoplast production, release and mutagenesis depend on many factors including fungal species, mycelium state and protoplasting conditions (osmotic stabilizer, temperature, pH, digestion time, lytic enzyme concentration and others) whether a protoplast is mononucleate, binucleate or multinucleate (Kumari and Panda, 1992; Coelho et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2018).
This study aimed to improve G. zeae VKM F-2600 strain for enhancement of LCA to UDCA bioconversion. The procedures for effective protoplast isolation and regeneration were developed and the mutants with increased 7β-hydroxylase activity were obtained.
Materials and methods
Lithocholic acid (3α-hydroxy-5β-cholanic acid, LCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (3α,7β-dihydroxy-5β-cholanic acid, UDCA) were obtained from ACROS Organics (New Jersey, USA). Yeast extract was purchased from Difco (Franklin Lakes, USA), lysing enzymes from Trichoderma harzianum and corn steep solids—from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). All other reagents were of the best quality grade from commercial suppliers.
Microorganism and cultivation
G. zeae VKM F-2600 was obtained from the All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms at the Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences (VKM IBPM RAS).
The fungus was routinely maintained on wort-agar slants. To obtain the first generation mycelium, the spore suspension from one agar slant (4 weeks old) was inoculated in 50 mL of the medium A containing (g/L): potato starch—45, corn steep solids—10, yeast extract—3, K2HPO4—2, KH2PO4—16, (pH 6.5) aerobically on a rotary shaker (220 rpm) at 28 °C for 24 h in Erlenmeyer flasks (750 mL).
The G. zeae mycelium grown in medium No 1–6 (Table 1) was separated from the culture liquid by filtration through gauze, washed with distilled water and centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 min. 100 mg of wet mycelium was resuspended in 1 mL of 0.1 M potassium-phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) supplemented with 2.5–15 mg of lytic enzymes complex from T. harzianum and 0.6–1.2 M osmostabilizer (KCl, NH4Cl, MgSO4 or sucrose). Incubation was carried out on a rotary shaker (220 rpm) at 28 °C for 1–15 h. The presence of protoplasts was controlled by H550s optical microscope (Nikon, Melville, USA). Protoplasts were separated from hyphal debris by filtration through the glass filter followed by centrifugation at 45,000×g for 15 min. The obtained sediment was re-suspended in 0.8 mL of 0.1 M potassium-phosphate buffer with an osmostabilizer.
A protoplast suspension samples (0.1 mL) were plated on the agar medium A containing 0.4–1.2 M osmostabilizer (KCl, NH4Cl or sucrose) and incubated at 28 °C for maximum 12 days.
Suspension of protoplasts (10 mL) obtained as described above was placed in a sterile Petri dish. Mutations were induced by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation (256 nm) at a 3-cm distance for 1–10 min. After UV irradiation, protoplast suspension samples (0.1 mL) were plated on the agar medium A supplemented with an osmostabilizer and ketoconazole (1–100 μM) and incubated at 28 °C for no more than 12 days.
For LCA bioconversion, medium B containing (g/L): soy flour—20, yeast extract—5, corn steep solids—10, K2HPO4—2, KH2PO4—16, MgSO4—0.5, FeSO4—0.02, TWEEN 80—0.1% (v/v) (pH 7.2) was inoculated with aliquot of the first generation mycelium (10%, v/v). LCA was added as a hot methanol solution [final solvent concentration did not exceed 2% (v/v)]. Bioconversion was performed aerobically on a rotary shaker (220 rpm) at 28 °C for a maximum of 168 h and steroid content was monitored daily by TLC and GC analyses as described below.
Isolation of steroids
At the end of incubation period, steroids were extracted twice from the cultivation broth with equal volumes of ethyl acetate (EtOAc). The extracts were concentrated to 2–3 mL by rotary evaporation of the solvent under vacuum and the obtained crude residues were fractionated by means of silica gel column chromatography (Kollerov et al. 2008). The column (16 mm × 450 mm) with Silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm) (Merck, Gernsheim, Germany) as a sorbent and chloroform/acetone/acetic acid mixtures of various percentage were applied. The individual compounds were analyzed by mass-spectrometry (MS), 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods as described below.
Thin layer chromatography (TLC)
The samples of cultivation broth (1 mL) were extracted with 5 mL of EtOAc. The extracts were applied to the pre-coated TLC-sheets ALUGRAM SIL G/UV254 (Düren, Germany), developed in a mixture of CHCl3-acetone-CH3COOH (50:50:0.5, v/v). The staining of TLC plates was carried out by MnCl2 reagent followed by heating to 105 °C until color developed.
MnCl2 reagent: MnCl2 × 4H2O—0.2 g, H2O—30 mL, methanol—30 mL, H2SO4 (97%)—2 mL (dropwise).
Gas chromatography (GC)
The samples (20 mL) of the cultivation broths were extracted with EtOAC (3 × 40 mL), the solvent was evaporated under vacuum and the residue was re-dissolved in EtOH (5 mL). BAs were analyzed in accordance with (Hayakawa et al. 1980). Trimethylsilyl derivatives of methyl esters of BAs were obtained as follows: 700 μL of 2 N solution of hydrogen chloride in methanol and 70 μL of 2,2-dimethoxypropane were added to the dry residue which was obtained after evaporation of the ethanol solution, the mixture was heated for 1 at 85 °C and evaporated to dryness under vacuum. Then, 100 µL of dehydrated methanol was added to the dried residue and again evaporated to dryness. Silanization was carried out by treatment with 600 μL of pyridine and bis (N,O-trimethylsilyl) trifluoracetamide (BSTFA) (2:1, v/v) for 40 min at 80 °C.
Analyses were performed on an HP 5890 chromatograph (Poway, USA), with SPB-1 quartz column (15 m × 0.25 mm), carrier gas (helium) flow—1.4 mL/min, column temperature—150–290 °C, and plasmic ionization detector with signal registration on HP 3396A integrator.
Retention times (Rt): LCA—6.54 min; UDCA – 7.49 min.
Mass-spectrometry (MS), 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy
MS spectra were recorded on Bruker Esquire 3000 Plus spectrometer (Billerica, USA).
1H-NMR spectra were recorded on UNITY + 400 «Varian» (Palo Alto, USA) with working frequency 300 MHz on 1H NMR nucleus in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3. Tetramethylsilane was used as an internal standard.
Spectral data of UDCA metabolite formed by G. zeae strains:
3α,7β-Dihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid (ursodeoxycholic acid, UDCA): Mp 198 0C [lit. mp 196 0C]; 1H-NMR (solvent d6-DMSO), selected signals, δ: 3.494 (2H, m, H-3β and H-7β); 0.980 (3H, s, CH3-19); 0.977 (3H, d; J = 6.2 Hz, CH3-21); 0.734 (3H, s, CH3-18) (Dangate et al. 2011). 13C-NMR (solvent d6-DMSO) δ: 176,882; 70.901; 70.721; 56.269; 55.335; 43.554; 43.292; 42.817; 40.340; 39.494; 37.379; 36.792; 35.432; 34.871; 33.947; 31.138; 30.798; 29.810; 28.358; 26.691; 22.690; 21.160; 17.687; 11.406. ESI–MS: 391.20 (calculated for [C24H40O4 + H]+: 391.56); [α]D = + 58 [lit. (Dangate et al. 2011) [α]D = + 59].
Microsoft Excel was used for data processing. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate and each presented value was the average of three independent experiments. Standard deviations (SD) were estimated using the following equation and were shown as errors on the graphs and in the Table 1:
where ∑ means "sum of", x is a value in the data set, μ is the mean of the data set, and N is the number of data points in the population.
Obtaining of G. zeae protoplasts
Effect of medium composition and mycelium age
The maximum yield of protoplasts (0.6 × 105/mL) was obtained using a medium containing glucose and yeast extract (medium no.3), while glucose replacement with sucrose (medium no.1) resulted in smaller number of protoplasts generated from G. zeae mycelium (Table 1). Removal of yeast extract (medium no.2) negatively affected protoplast generation. The yield of protoplasts significantly decreased when the medium enriched with peptone (medium no. 4) or soy flour (medium no. 5) was used for the cultivation of fungus (Table 1).
The highest yield of G. zeae protoplasts was observed when 18-h mycelium in the active growth phase was used for treatment with lytic enzymes (Figs. 2a, 3a–c), while younger (15-h) or older (24–48 h) mycelium was less suitable for protoplast formation (Fig. 2a).
Effect of osmotic stabilizers, lytic enzyme concentration and digestion time
In this study, we evaluated the effect of KCl, NH4Cl, MgSO4, and sucrose at various concentrations (0.6–1.2 M) on the integrity of G. zeae protoplasts. As shown in Fig. 2b, higher protoplast integrity was observed at a concentration of osmostabilizers of 1 M with the maximum level reached for ammonium chloride (Fig. 2b, 3h).
To obtain G. zeae protoplasts, we chose a cocktail of T. harzianum lytic enzymes, characterized by the activities of β-glucanase, cellulase, protease, and chitinase, and studied the effect of its various concentrations (2.5–15 mg/mL) and digestion time (1–15 h). Maximum yield of protoplasts was observed at the exposure of the lytic enzymes at concentration of 7.5 mg/mL for 5 h (Fig. 2c, d).
Thus, our results showed that the use of 18-h mycelium grown in a medium containing glucose and yeast extract, the treatment of cells with a cocktail of lytic enzymes at an optimal concentration of 7.5 mg/mL for 5 h, the use of 1 M ammonium chloride as an osmotic stabilizer provides up to 0.6 × 105/mL of G. zeae protoplasts for further mutagenesis.
Regeneration rate of G. zeae protoplasts was largely determined by the choice of an osmotic stabilizer in the agar medium A. Ammonium chloride, which turned out to be the best osmotic stabilizer at the stage of protoplast release (Fig. 2b), nevertheless showed a smaller positive effect compared to sucrose at the regeneration stage (Fig. 4). The use of 1 M sucrose provided the highest regeneration frequency of G. zeae protoplasts (≥ 9%) (Fig. 4).
Influence of ketoconazole and UV irradiation on protoplast viability
In this work, the influence of different concentration of ketoconazole (15–80 µM) on the viability of G. zeae protoplasts has been studied. Complete inhibition of the protoplast regeneration was observed at the fungicide concentration of 70 µM that was determined as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and used in further experiments on selection of ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones after UV mutagenesis and regeneration of fungal protoplasts (Figs. 5i, 6a).
UV irradiation was used for the mutagenesis of G. zeae protoplasts. As follows from Fig. 6b and Fig. 7, an exposure of the mutagenic factor for 3.5–4 min provided survival of 6–12% fungal protoplasts that was reported to be optimum of viable cells in best numbers with possible only one or few mutations (Mukherjee and Sengupta 1986). Exposure to UV irradiation for more than 6 min resulted in complete loss of protoplast viability (Fig. 7e).
Screening of mutant G. zeae strains activity towards LCA
In total, 27 ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones have been isolated after protoplast mutagenesis and regeneration. The clones were screened for their biocatalytic activity towards LCA (4 g/L) and three mutant strains (M-13, M-20 and M-23) were revealed with superior activity (Fig. 8a).
According to TLC and GC analysis, the G. zeae M23 mutant strain exhibited the maximum 7β-hydroxylase activity towards LCA (4 g/L), providing a yield of the target UDCA 26% higher (up to 88% (w/w)) compared to the parent strain (Fig. 8). Noteworthy, the mutation influenced the selectivity of LCA to UDCA bioconversion: only about 3% (w/w) LCA retained unconverted in the case of mutant fungus, whilst it was about 21% (w/w) for the parent strain. Besides, the amount of the undefined metabolite X significantly decreased in the case of M23 mutant (Fig. 8c).
To improve the microbial synthesis of UDCA by ascomycete G. zeae VKM F-2600, various parameters involved in protoplast isolation and regeneration were studied, including medium composition, mycelial age, osmotic stabilizer, concentration of lytic enzymes and digestion time, concentration of the antifungal agent ketoconazole and UV irradiation dose.
The efficiency of the formation of G. zeae protoplasts was largely affected by the composition of the nutrient medium used for cultivating the mycelium of the second generation stage, which was higher when glucose and yeast extract were used as components of the medium. On the contrary, the application of peptone and soy flour led to a significant decrease in the yield of protoplasts (Table 1). This can be explained by possible alterations in the composition of the cell wall, which consists mainly of glucans, chitin, and glycoproteins and, as is well known, changes depending on the growth conditions (Wu and Chou 2019; Garcia-Rubio et al. 2020).
Mycelium age is regarded as one of the main factors influencing the release of protoplasts (Coelho et al. 2010; Wei et al. 2010). The structure of the fungal cell wall is highly dynamic, and may vary during the cell division, growth of fungi and hyphal branching (Li et al. 2017). In the case of G. zeae, the use of log growth phase mycelium ensured the maximum yield of protoplasts (Figs. 2a, 3a-c). This correlates with the literature data, which in most cases demonstrate better protoplast generation from actively growing mycelium (Harling et al. 1988). The age of mycelium was shown to be an important factor while protoplast obtaining from F. graminearum Fg99: mycelia in different times after culturing (6, 8, 12 and 14) were examined for protoplast preparation and the best result was obtained when the spores were left to germinate for 6 h (Moradi et al. 2013).
A sharp (more than fivefold) decrease in the yield of G. zeae protoplasts when using 48-h mycelium (Fig. 2a) may be associated with increased differentiation of the population, a change in the frequency of septation of hyphae, and the appearance of spore cells with a denser cell wall (Ren et al. 2018). As shown earlier, C. lunatus protoplasts obtained from actively growing mycelium were presumably more resistant to external influences compared to protoplasts obtained from cells of older fungi (Długoński et al. 1998).
The choice of an osmotic stabilizer can largely determine the efficiency of protoplast formation while maintaining their integrity (Rui and Morell 1993). Osmotic pressure stabilizers can balance the internal and external osmotic pressure of protoplasts that have lost cell wall protection and prevent the destruction of protoplasts (Harris 1982). When obtaining fungal protoplasts, inorganic salts (KCl, MgSO4, NaCl or NH4Cl) or sugars (sucrose, glucose or sorbitol) are often used as osmotic stabilizers (Zhou et al. 2008; Coelho et al. 2010).
The use of 1 M NH4Cl contributed to the best integrity of G. zeae protoplasts (Figs. 2b, 3h). The results differ from those reported for the fungal strains of Pseudozyma flocculosa, Epulorhiza repens, Ceratorhiza sp. and Benjaminiella poitrasii, in which higher protoplast integrity was achieved using 0.6 M KCl as an osmoprotector (Coelho et al. 2010; Cheng and Bélanger 2000; Chitnis and Deshpande 2002). The properties and composition of cell walls differ in different fungal species and may vary depending on environmental conditions, which, in turn, necessitates experimental selection of the osmotic stabilizers used and their concentrations, as well as lytic agents and lysis conditions for protoplast generation (Patil and Jadhav 2015; Gow et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017; Peng et al. 2016). Previously when protoplast obtaining from G. zeae 5373 and ATCC 20,273 strains, the most effective combinations of lytic enzymes were chitinase plus β-glucuronidase yielding up to 1 × 105/mL protoplasts (Adams et al. 1987; Adams and Hart 1989).
It is known that when obtaining fungal protoplasts, the formation of spheroplasts (cells with partial cell wall) may be observed and it often depends on the choice of lytic enzymes and duration time (Li et al. 2017; Wang et al. 1988). In turn, the presence of spheroplasts can increase the percentage of their regeneration (Wagner and Wilkinson 1993; Cabo et al. 1986). Our goal was to obtain true intact protoplasts of G. zeae for their further mutagenesis, and for this purpose a lysing enzymes complex from T. harzianum contains β-glucanase, cellulase, protease, and chitinase activities necessary for complete removal of cell wall was chosen. This, probably, contributed to the production of mainly protoplasts than spheroplasts in the case of G. zeae that, in turn, could affect a relatively low degree of their regeneration frequency (1.5–9%) (Fig. 5).
The concentration of the T. harzianum lytic enzyme cocktail chosen in this work and the digestion time strongly influenced the release of G. zeae protoplasts. Application of 7.5 mg/mL for 5 h (Figs. 2c, d) ensured best result, whilst the exposure for more than 10 h led to 2.5–10 times lower protoplast release (Fig. 2d). Probably, the protease, which is a part of the digestive complex, contributed to destruction of G. zeae protoplasts causing extensive damage of their membrane proteins. As reported earlier, the protoplasts of various fungi were destroyed by proteinases upon the contact for more than 4 h (Kitamoto et al. 1988). Prolonged incubation with digestive mixtures resulted in lysis of the protoplasts of E. repens, Ceratorhiza sp. and Geomyces sp. (Coelho et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2018).
Protoplast regeneration is a cell-wall reconstruction and return to mycelial growth. Usually, the protoplasts of filamentous fungi are characterized by a low frequency of regeneration, ranging from 0.1 to 50.0% for different fungi, depending mainly on the fungal species and the composition of the regeneration medium (Li et al. 2017; Balasubramanian et al. 2003). Tests for fungal growth at different concentrations of osmotic stabilizers are needed because, in some cases, changing the concentration of ingredients in the regeneration media can significantly increase the frequency of protoplast regeneration (Coelho et al. 2010).
The highest regeneration frequency of G. zeae protoplasts (≥ 9%) was observed while using 1 M sucrose in the agar medium (Fig. 4). The positive effect of sucrose on protoplast regeneration was previously shown for E. repens, Ceratorhiza sp. and Moniliophthora perniciosa (previously Crinipellis perniciosa) fungal strains: the use of 0.5 M sucrose provided the best regeneration rate ranging from 5 to 10% (Coelho et al. 2010; Lima et al. 2003). 0.8 M sucrose was successfully used for regeneration of G. zeae 5373 and ATCC 20,273 protoplasts however if 0.8 M mannitol was used to suspend the protoplasts instead of 0.8 M sucrose, then the number of regenerated protoplasts decreased by approximately 20% (Adams et al. 1987; Adams and Hart 1989). For P. flocculosa the regeneration frequency of protoplasts reached 75% when 0.8 M sucrose was used as an osmotic stabilizer in agar medium (Cheng and Bélanger 2000). The protoplast yields of fungus Antrodia cinnamomea in the reaction mix with MgSO4 and KCl as osmotic stabilizers gradually decreased after 4-h digestion; on the other hand, sucrose (0.8 M) maintained a stable protoplast yield throughout the 9-h digestion (Garcia-Rubio et al. 2020).
Fungal protoplast mutation is known to be a fast and convenient method providing high sensitivity to stimulation, high mutation rate, and simplicity of the screening procedure (Peng et al. 2016). The use of N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG) or UV light irradiation are the most common methods of fungal protoplast mutagenesis (Wilmańska et al. 1992; Shafique et al. 2009; Besoain et al. 2007). Successful use of UV irradiation was previously observed when obtaining various G. zeae 'Dewar', 65-338B, 251-15 and ATCC 20273 mutants including adenine-, arginine-, and histidine auxotrophs; a non-nutritional, heat-sensitive mutant; and an NADPH-dependent, glutamate dehydrogenase-deficient mutant (Leslie 1983).
In the present study, the optimum of UV exposure (3.5 min) as well as the MIC of ketoconazole (70 µM) hindering G. zeae protoplast regeneration have been defined (Figs. 5i, 6a). The imidazole antifungal agent is well known as an effective inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes and previously it was used as a selective marker while screening of mutant strains of C. lunatus with increased steroid hydroxylase activity (Oh et al. 1993; Lu et al. 2007; Kollerov et al. 2010).
By combining the developed original procedure of G. zeae protoplast obtaining, UV mutagenesis and regeneration, 27 ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones were obtained. Comparative statistical analysis of LCA to UDCA conversion by G. zeae parent and mutant strains based on GC data of three independent experiments revealed three mutant strains (M-13, M-20 and M-23) capable of producing 10–30% more UDCA. One of the strains (M18) showed weaker than parent strain activity towards LCA (Fig. 8a). Other selected mutant strains did not differ from the parent fungus on their activity towards LCA (Fig. 8a). Among the tested strains, the mutant G. zeae M23 was chosen due to its superior target activity. The strain selectively converted LCA even at 4 g/L to give up to 88% of UDCA (Fig. 8c).
Up to date, the use of fungal protoplasts in the producing mutant strains with increased steroid hydroxylase activity was reported only for C. lunatus strains that are known mainly for their 11β-hydroxylase activity and applied in the synthesis of hydrocortisone. Using this approach, a mutant C. lunata KA91 had been obtained that demonstrated 42% higher production of 11β-hydroxylated products compared to parent strain (Lu et al. 2007). The selectivity of cortexolone to hydrocortisone conversion was increased when using mutant clones of C. lunata IM2901 (Wilmańska et al. 1992). In comparison with parent strain, C. lunata M4 mutant strain showed 25–30% higher yield of 11β-hydroxylated derivatives from 17α,21-diacetate cortexolone (Kollerov et al. 2010).
To our knowledge, no data on the improvement of steroid 7β-hydroxylase activity of the fungal strains via protoplast obtaining and mutagenesis have been reported so far. It should be noted that the absolute value of UDCA titer (3.52 g/L) reached using G. zeae M23 mutant strain obtained in this work significantly exceeds LCA to UDCA conversion rates ever reported for fungal strains, including Fusarium equiseti M-41 (a maximum UDCA yield of 0.35 g/L) (Sawada et al. 1982, 1986), Penicillium sp. TTUR 422 (FERM BP-5410) (maximum 0.25 g/L of UDCA) (Okamura and Matsui 1999) and the representatives of Bipolaris, Cunninghamella, Cochliobolus and Gibberella genera where UDCA yield did not exceed 0.9 g/L (Kollerov et al. 2013).
The results evidence that the method based on protoplast generation, UV mutagenesis and selection of ketoconazole-resistant mutant clones allows improvement of steroid hydroxylase activity of filamentous fungi and open up the prospects for effective microbial manufacturing of the value-added UDCA.
With high probability, we expect that 7β-hydroxylase from G. zeae relates to CYP monooxygenases. Despite the publications on the complete genome sequences of related strains of G. zeae and F. graminearum (Jurgenson et al. 2002; King et al. 2015), the 7β-hydroxylase gene has not yet been identified. To fill this gap, our next work will focus on the identification of the gene encoding steroid 7β-hydroxylase in G. zeae VKM F-2600 using transcriptomic analysis, cloning and heterologous expression, followed by a comparative analysis of the parental and mutant strain M23 for the presence of mutations in the sequences of the selected gene that may contribute to its overexpression.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Abdulrab S, Al-Maweri S, Halboub E (2020) Ursodeoxycholic acid as a candidate therapeutic to alleviate and/or prevent COVID-19-associated cytokine storm. Med Hypotheses 143:109897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109897
Adams GC, Johnson N, Leslie JF, Hart LP (1987) Heterokaryons of Gibberella zeae formed following hyphal anastomosis or protoplast fusion. Exp Mycol 11:339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-5975(87)90022-3
Adams GC, Hart LP (1989) The role of deoxynivalenol and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol in pathogenesis by Gibberella zeae, as elucidated through protoplast fusions between toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains. Phytopathology 79:404–408
Angulo P, Batts KP, Therneau TM (1999) Longterm ursodeoxycholic acid delays histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 29:644–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290301
Balasubramanian N, Juliet GA, Srikalaivani P, Lalithakumari D (2003) Release and regeneration of protoplasts from the fungus Trichothecium roseum. Can J Microbiol 49:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1139/w03-034
Begley M, Gahan CG, Hill C (2005) The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003
Besoain XA, Pérez LM, Araya A, Lefever L, Sanguinetti M, Montealegre JR (2007) New strains obtained after UV treatment and protoplast fusion of native Trichoderma harzianum: their biocontrol activity on Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Electron J Biotechnol 10:604–617. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-34582007000400013
Bortolini O, Medici A, Poli S (1997) Biotransformations on steroid nucleus of bile acids. Steroids 62:564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(97)00043-3
Cabo AP, Reyes E, Novaes-Ledieu M, Mendoza CG (1986) Cell wall remnants and spheroplast regeneration in Mucor rouxii. Trans Br Mycol Soc 86:545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80055-9
Carlstroem K, Kirk DN, Sjoevall J (1981) Microbial synthesis of 1β- and 15β-hydroxylated bile acids. J Lipid Res 22:1225–1234
Cheng Y, Bélanger RR (2000) Protoplast preparation and regeneration from spores of the biocontrol fungus Pseudozyma flocculosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 15:287–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09300.x
Chitnis MV, Deshpande MV (2002) Isolation and regeneration of protoplasts from the yeast and mycelial form of the dimorphic zygomycete Benjaminiella poitrasii: role of chitin metabolism for morphogenesis during regeneration. Microbiol Res 157:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-5013-00129
Coelho IS, Queiroz M, Costa MD, Kasuya MC, Araújo EF (2010) Production and regeneration of protoplasts from orchid mycorrhizal fungi Epulorhiza repens and Ceratorhiza sp. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132010000100019
Dangate PS, Salunke CL, Akamanchi KG (2011) Regioselective oxidation of cholic acid and its 7b epimer by using o-iodoxybenzoic acid. Steroids 76:1397–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2011.07.009
Długoński J, Słaba M, Wilmańska D (1998) The use of cryopreserved apical protoplasts from Curvularia lunata for electrotransformation. Microbios 95:71–77
Durairaj P, Hur J, Yun H (2016) Versatile biocatalysis of fungal cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Microb Cell Fact 15:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0523-6
Garcia-Rubio R, de Oliveira HC, Rivera J, Trevijano-Contador N (2020) The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species. Front Microbiol 10:2993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993
Girvan HM, Munro AW (2016) Applications of microbial cytochrome P450 enzymes in biotechnology and synthetic biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol 31:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.02.018
Gow NA, Latge JP, Munro CA (2017) The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectr 5:3. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016
Guzior DV, Quinn RA (2021) Review: microbial transformations of human bile acids. Microbiome 9:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01101-1
Harling R, Kenyon L, Lewis BG, Oliver RP, Turner JG, Coddington A (1988) Conditions for efficient isolation and regeneration of protoplasts from Fulvia fulva. J Phytopathol 122:143–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1988.tb01001.x
Harris GM (1982) Protoplasts from Gibberella fujikuroi. Phytopathology 72:1403. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-1403
Hayakawa S, Yao K, Lijima M, Sasaki K (1980) 12β-Hydroxylation of litchoholic acid using the fungus Helicostylum piriforme. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 3:84–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3980000084A
Hofmann AF, Hagey LR (2008) Bile acids: chemistry, pathochemistry, biology, pathobiology, and therapeutics. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:2461–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-7568-6
Ikegami T, Matsuzaki Y (2008) Ursodeoxycholic acid: mechanism of action and novel clinical applications. Hepatol Res 38:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00297
Işık S, Karaman M, Çilaker Micili S, Çağlayan-Sözmen Ş, Bağrıyanık HA, Arıkan-Ayyıldız Z, Uzuner N, Karaman Ö (2017) Beneficial effects of ursodeoxycholic acid via inhibition of airway remodelling, apoptosis of airway epithelial cells, and Th2 immune response in murine model of chronic asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (madr) 45:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aller.2016.12.003
Jurgenson JE, Bowden RL, Zeller KA, Leslie JF, Alexander NJ, Plattner RD (2002) A genetic map of Gibberella zeae (Fusarium graminearum). Genetics 160:1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/160.4.1451
King R, Urban M, Hammond-Kosack MC, Pak KH, Hammond-Kosack KE (2015) The completed genome sequence of the pathogenic ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. BMC Genomics 16:544. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1756-1
Kitamoto Y, Mori N, Yamamoto M, Ohiwa T, Ichikawa Y (1988) A simple method for protoplast formation and improvement of protoplast regeneration from various fungi using an enzyme from Trichoderma harzianum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 28:445–450
Kollerov VV, Monti D, Deshcherevskaya NO, Lobastova TG, Ferrandi EE, Larovere A, Gulevskaya SA, Riva S, Donova MV (2013) Hydroxylation of lithocholic acid by selected actinobacteria and filamentous fungi. Steroids 78:370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2012.12.010
Kollerov VV, Shutov AA, Fokina VV, Sukhodol’skaya GV, Donova MV (2008) Biotransformation of 3-keto-androstanes by the strain of Gongronella butleri VKM F-1033. J Mol Catal B Enzym 55:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2008.01.009
Kollerov VV, Shutov AA, Fokina VV, Sukhodol’skaia GV, Gulevskaia SA, Donova MV (2010) Bioconversion of C19- and C21-steroids with parent and mutant strains of Curvularia lunata. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol 46:212–220
Kristan K, Riˇzner TL (2012) Steroid-transforming enzymes in fungi. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 129:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.012
Kulprecha S, Ueda T, Nichira T, Tagushi YT, H, (1985) Optimum conditions for ursodeoxycholic acid production from lithcholic acid by Fusarium equizeti M-41. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.49.2.338-344.1985
Kumari JA, Panda T (1992) Studies on critical analysis of factors influencing improved production off protoplasts from Trichoderma reesei micelium. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(92)90073-W
Leslie JF (1983) Some genetic techniques for Gibberella zeae. Phytopathology 73:1005–1008
Li D, Tang Y, Lin J, Cai W (2017) Methods for genetic transformation of filamentous fungi. Microb Cell Fact 3:168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0785-7
Lima JO, dos Santos JK, Pereira JF, de Resende ML, de Araújo EF, de Queiroz MV (2003) Development of a transformation system for Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom in cocoa plants. Curr Genet 42:236–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-002-0358-z
Lu W, Du L, Wang M, Jia X, Wen J, Huang Y, Guo Y, Gong W, Bao H, Yang J, Sun B (2007) Optimization of hydrocortisone production by Curvularia lunata. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-0005-8
Moradi S, Sanjarian F, Safaie N, Mousavi A, Khaniki G (2013) A modified method for transformation of Fusarium graminearum J. Crop Prot 2:297–304
Moriarty RM, Shores M, David NE, Mahmood NA (2014) Synthetic bile acid compositions and methods. US Patent 0038932 A1.
Mukherjee M, Sengupta S (1986) Mutagenesis of protoplasts and regeneration of mycelium in the mushroom Volvariella volvacea. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:1412–1414. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.6.1412-1414.1986
Nassiri-Koopaei N, Faramarzi MA (2015) Recent developments in the fungal transformation of steroids. Biocatal Biotransformation 33:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/10242422.2015.1022533
Oh K, Matsuoka H, Teraoka T, Sumita O, Takatori K, Kurata H (1993) Effects of antimycotics on the biosynthesis of cellular macromolecules in Aspergillus niger protoplasts. Mycopathologia 122:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103473
Okamura A; Matsui H (1999) Bile acid converting microorganism and process for preparing bile acid US Patent: 5,989,855.
Patil NS, Jadhav JP (2015) Penicillium ochrochloron MTCC 517 chitinase: an effective tool in commercial enzyme cocktail for production and regeneration of protoplasts from various fungi. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.09.022
Peng R, Fu Y, Zou J, Qiu H, Gan L, Yi H, Yao R, Luo X (2016) Improvement of polysaccharide and triterpenoid production of Ganoderma lucidum through mutagenesis of protoplasts. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 30:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1133254
Philipp B (2011) Bacterial degradation of bile salts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:903–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2998-0
Prabha V, Ohri M (2006) Bacterial transformation of bile acids. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-005-9019-y
Ren N, Liu J, Yang D, Liu X, Zhou J, Peng Y (2018) Preparation and regeneration of protoplasts from the ethyl vincamine producing fungus CH1 (Geomyces sp.). Nat Prod Commun 13:145–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1801300209
Roth MG, Chilvers MI (2019) A protoplast generation and transformation method for soybean sudden death syndrome causal agents Fusarium virguliforme and F. brasiliense. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 6:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0070-0
Rui C, Morrell JJ (1993) Production of fungal protoplasts from selected wood-degrading fungi. Wood Fiber Sci 25:61–65
Sawada H, Kulprecha S, Nilubol N, Yoshida T, Kinoshita S, Taguchi H (1982) Microbial production of ursodeoxycholic acid from lithocholic acid by Fusarium equiseti M41. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1249–1252. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.44.6.1249-1252.1982
Sawada H, Taguchi H (1986) Method for production of ursodeoxycholic acid by means of microbial transformation. US Patent: 4,579,819.
Shafique S, Bajwa R, Shafique S (2009) Strain improvement and genetic characterization of indigenous Aspergillus flavus for amylolytic potential. Nat Prod Commun 4:977–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0900400720
Solis S, Flores ME, Huitron C (1996) Protoplasts from pectinolytic fungi: Isolation, regeneration and pectinolytic enzyme production. Lett Appl Microbiol 23:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb00024.x
Tonin F, Arends I (2018) Latest development in the synthesis of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA): a critical review. Beilstein J Org Chem 14:470–483. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.14.33
Wang J, Holden DW, Leong SA (1988) Gene transfer system for the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:865–869. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.3.865
Wang Y, Yue Q, Zhao Y, Qiu S, Peng Y, Li J, Zhang T, Hai L, Guo L, Wu Y (2016) First synthesis of 22-oxa-chenodeoxycholic acid analogue. Steroids 110:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2016.04.004
Wagner RE, Wilkinson HT (1993) Spheroplast and protoplast formation from cysts of phytophthora sojae treated with digestive enzymes. Mycologia 85:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1993.12026257
Wei Y, Zhou X, Liu L, Lu J, Wang Z, Yu G, Hu L, Lin J, Sun X, Tang K (2010) An efficient transformation system of taxol-producing endophytic fungus EFY-21 (Ozonium sp.). Afr J Biotechnol 9:1726–1733. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2010.000-3019
Wilmańska D, Milczarek K, Rumijowska A, Bartnicka K, Sedlaczek L (1992) Elimination of by-products in 11 beta-hydroxylation of substance S using Curvularia lunata clones regenerated from NTG-treated protoplasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 37:626–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240738
Wu JD, Chou JC (2019) Optimization of protoplast preparation and regeneration of a medicinal fungus Antrodia cinnamomea. Mycobiology 47:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2019.1687252
Zhou X, Wei Y, Zhu H, Wang Z, Lin J, Liu L, Tang K (2008) Protoplast formation, regeneration and transformation from the taxol-producing fungus Ozonium sp. Afr J Biotechnol 7:2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2008.000-5050
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under Grant No. 21-64-00024.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or vertebrates performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kollerov, V., Donova, M. Ursodeoxycholic acid production by Gibberella zeae mutants. AMB Expr 12, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01446-2
- Gibberella zeae
- Lithocholic acid
- Ursodeoxycholic acid