Skip to main content

Specific enrichment of microbes and increased ruminal propionate production: the potential mechanism underlying the high energy efficiency of Holstein heifers fed steam-flaked corn

Abstract

Corn grain has a high starch content and is used as main energy source in ruminant diets. Compared with finely ground corn (FGC), steam-flaked corn (SFC) could improve the milk yield of lactating dairy cows and the growth performance of feedlot cattle, but the detailed mechanisms underlying those finding are unknown. The rumen microbiome breaks down feedstuffs into energy substrates for the host animals, and contributes to feed efficiency. Therefore, the current study was conducted to investigate the ruminal bacterial community changes of heifers fed differently processed corn (SFC or FGC) using 16S rRNA sequencing technologies, and to uncover the detailed mechanisms underlying the high performance of ruminants fed the SFC diet. The results revealed that different processing methods changed the rumen characteristics and impacted the composition of the rumen bacteria. The SFC diet resulted in an increased average daily gain in heifers, an increased rumen propionate concentration and a decreased rumen ammonia nitrogen concentration. The relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were tended to increase or significantly increased in the heifers fed SFC diet compared with FGC diet. In addition, the relative abundance of amylolytic bacteria of the genera Succinivibrio, Roseburia and Blautia were elevated, and the cellulolytic bacteria (Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-013) were decreased by the steam flaking method. Spearman correlation analysis between the ruminal bacteria and the microbial metabolites showed that the rumen propionate concentration was positively correlated with genera Succinivibrio and Blautia abundance, but negatively correlated with genera Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 abundance. Evident patterns of efficient improvement in rumen propionate and changes in rumen microbes to further improve feed conversion were identified. This observation uncovers the potential mechanisms underlying the increased efficiency of the SFC processing method for enhancing ruminant performance.

Introduction

Cereal grains are the prevailing feed energy source for ruminants in the livestock industry, and have significant economic importance for human consumption (Marshall et al. 2013). Approximately 75% of the corn grain energy value is derived from starch (NRC 2001). The improvement of starch utilization may improve animal health conditions and performance, and reduced feed costs when grain prices are high. Also, high grains utilization efficiency could alleviate the competition between livestock and humans for food availability (Ertl et al. 2016).

Grain processing is the most widely used method to maximize starch digestibility and improve animal performance in the feedlot industry (Zinn et al. 2002). The germ and endosperm are surrounded by the pericarp, and the protein matrix in the endosperm blocks starch granules in corn grain, which collectively impedes the attachment of microbes to degrade starch (Kotarski et al. 1992; McAllister et al. 1994). Steam flaking could gelatinize starch granules, disrupt crystalline structures, and dissolve polysaccharides, thereby enabling the diffusion of compounds from ruptured granules (Safaei and Yang 2017) and allowing ruminal microorganisms increase access to amylose and amylopectin molecules (Kotarski et al. 1992). However, grinding corn, as a conventional and low-cost processing method, is still used for ruminants. Ferraretto et al. (2013) summarized that the total starch digestibility of steam-flaked corn (SFC) was significantly higher than of finely ground corn (FGC), 93.9% vs 92%. Studies have shown that feeding ruminants SFC increases milk performance in cows (Chen et al. 1994; Zhong et al. 2008; Cooke et al. 2008; May et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2017; Miyaji and Nonaka 2018) and the growth performance in feedlot cattle (Lee et al. 1982; Owens et al. 1997; Zinn et al. 2002; May et al. 2010). However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the effect of corn processing methods on animal performance are not fully understood.

The rumen is a large fermentation tank for ruminants and contains diverse bacteria, archaea, protozoa and fungi. The microbial communities are crucial for the degradation of complex feeds into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and the synthesis of vitamins and protein for ruminants’ health and production performance (Krause et al. 2003; Zilber-Rosenberg and Rosenberg 2008). Many factors affect the ruminal microbial community, such as host (Malmuthuge and Guan 2017), heredity (Paz et al. 2016), diet (Hua et al. 2017), disease (Ma et al. 2018), physical stage (Zhu et al. 2017), age (Jami et al. 2013) or additives (Uyeno et al. 2015), and diet plays a dominant role in shaping the ruminal microbial community and deciding the ruminal fermentation patterns. Concentrate-rich or forage-based diets are dominated by starch-degrading amylolytic bacteria or fibrolytic bacteria in rumen, which mainly degrade starch or fiber and produce a substantial amount of propionate or acetate, respectively. However, little information is available on the effect of physical corn processing method on the rumen microbial communities. Considering the increased performance and physical changes in heifers fed SFC, we hypothesized that differently processed corn modulated the ruminal bacterial community and the rumen metabolites, thereby improving animal performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the ruminal bacterial community composition and fermentation parameters of heifers fed differently processed corn using 16S rRNA sequencing technologies, and further uncover the potential mechanisms by which the highly efficient SFC processing method aids ruminants.

Materials and methods

Animals, experimental design and sample collection

Twenty-six Holstein heifers (7 months old; body weight 291 ± 23 kg, mean ± SD) housed at a commercial dairy farm were selected for the experiment. Holstein heifers were blocked by weight and randomly assigned into two groups with thirteen heifers each. The experimental diets were steam-flaked corn (SFC) and finely ground corn (FGC) diet. Diets were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements for heifers (NRC 2001). The ingredients and nutritional composition of the diet are showed in Table 1. Heifers were fed twice a day at 0800 and 1600. Water and feed were provided for ad libitum consumption. The experiment was last for four weeks. All heifers were weighed 3 consecutive days at the beginning and the ending of the experiment periods. The rumen fluid was sampled at the last 2 consecutive days of the experimental periods. This study is part of our unpublished research, and the original experiment was a 2 × 2 factorial design with two factors of rumen escape starch levels (SFC and FGC diets) and rumen-protected leucine supplementation. The unpublished article mainly focuses on postruminal starch digestion, and rumen-protected leucine has no effect on rumen fermentation. Therefore, we organized the present study by focusing only on the main effect of rumen escape starch levels on rumen metabolites and microbes.

Table 1 Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets (dry matter basis%)

Rumen fluid was collected by oral stomach tubes at 2 h and 4 h post feeding on the sampling day, according to a reported procedure (Imhasly et al. 2014). After discarding the first 50 mL of fluid to minimize saliva contamination, approximately 100 mL of rumen sample was collected. Immediately after collection, 2 mL of the rumen sample was aliquoted and stored in liquid nitrogen for DNA extraction, and the rest of the rumen sample immediately measured pH and was filtered through four layers of sterile cheesecloth. The 10 mL filtered liquid sample was acidified with 2 mL of 25% (weight/volume) metaphosphoric acid and stored at − 20 °C until analysis of the ruminal fermentation characteristics. Before sample analysis, the samples taken from the two time points were mixed together.

Ruminal metabolite analysis

Ruminal VFA (including acetate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, isobutyrate and isovalerate) concentrations of each sample were analyzed by gas chromatography (Agilent Technologies 7820A GC system, Santa Clara, USA) using a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.33 μm fused silica column (AE-FFAP; ATECH Technologies Co., Ltd, Lanzhou, China) after removing the solid particles and proteins in the sample according to previously described methods (Li et al. 2014). Ruminal ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) was measured as previously described (Chaney and Marbach 1962).

Feed chemical analyses

Feed samples were dried for 24 h at 105 °C for dry matter (DM) analysis to adjust dietary ingredient inclusion rates. Duplicate composite samples were dried in a hot-air oven at 55 °C for 48 h, ground in a Wiley mill with a 2-mm mesh screen (Thomas-Wiley Laboratory Mill) followed by a 1-mm mesh screen. All the samples were analyzed for DM (105 °C for 8 h), CP (method #988.05) and crude ash (#942.05) according to the AOAC Methods (AOAC International 2002). Diet NDF and ADF were analyzed with sodium sulfite and heat-stable α-amylase (Ankom A200I Fiber Analyzer, NKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) according to Van Soest et al. (1991). Starch content was determined by an enzymatic method (α-amylase and amyloglucosidase) with a commercial starch analysis kit (Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Bray, Ireland).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and Illumina MiSeq sequencing

The full-length 16S rRNA genes of all rumen fluid samples in this study were assessed using high-throughput sequencing on the PacBio ® RS II platform (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Genomic DNA was extracted from ruminal samples using the E.Z.N.A.® soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, U.S.) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The final DNA concentration and purity were determined by a NanoDrop 2000 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA), and DNA quality was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) and a thermocycler PCR system (GeneAmp 9700, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR reactions were conducted using the following program: 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C, 27 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s for annealing at 55 °C, and 45 s for elongation at 72 °C, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate 20 μL mixture containing 4 μL of 5 × FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL of FastPfu Polymerase and 10 ng of template DNA. The resulted PCR products were extracted from a 2% agarose gel and further purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified using QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, Madison, WA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar and paired-end sequenced (2 × 300) on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA).

Sequencing data processing

Raw fastq files were demultiplexed, quality-filtered by Trimmomatic (Bolger et al. 2014) and merged by FLASH (Magoč and Salzberg 2011) with the following criteria: (i) The reads were truncated at any site receiving an average quality score < 20 over a 50 bp sliding window. (ii) Reads exactly matching primers, allowing 2 nucleotide mismatching, and reads containing ambiguous bases were removed. (iii) Sequences whose overlap was longer than 10 bp were merged according to their overlap sequence. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with 97% similarity cutoff using UPARSE(version 7.1 http://drive5.com/uparse/), and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME. The taxonomy of each 16S rRNA gene sequence was analyzed by the RDP Classifier algorithm (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) against the Silva (SSU123) 16S rRNA database using a confidence threshold of 70%. The identified sequences were deposited in the NCBI sequence archive (SRA) under accession no. PRJNA552771.

Predicted molecular functions based on 16S rRNA data using PICRUSt

To explore the functional profiles of our bacterial community data set, we used PICURSt to predict gene family abundances based on 16S rRNA data. PICRUSt uses an extended ancestral-state reconstruction algorithm to predict which gene families are present and then combines gene families to estimate the composite metagenome (Langille et al. 2013). The available annotated genes were imputed into Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/) to predict metagenomics potential. The predicted genes and their functions were aligned to KEGG database. The principal component analysis (PCA) plotting and statistical hypothesis tests for pairs of samples were then performed using STAMP software (Parks et al. 2014).

Statistical analysis

The microbiota OTU data, phylum and genus relative abundances, rumen VFA (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, isovalerate, acetate to propionate ratio and total VFAs) concentrations, NH3-N concentration, rumen pH and average daily gain (ADG) were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA of SPSS software (Version 18.0; IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY). In addition, one-way ANOVA of the microbiota data was based on the normal distribution test. Treatment differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and 0.05 < P < 0.10 was designed as a tendency. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) were analyzed with the FactoMine and vegan package in R software (http://www.R-project.org/). Correlations between bacterial taxa and rumen fermentation characteristic variables were calculated by non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation analysis using R software.

Results

Changes in rumen microbial metabolites and the growth performance of heifers

In the present study, corn processing changed rumen microbial metabolites and growth performance in dairy heifers. First, the ADG was significantly higher in the SFC group than the FGC group (P = 0.034; Fig. 1a), as expected. The concentration of total rumen VFA was similar among treatments (P = 0.327; Fig. 1d). However, the propionate proportion was markedly elevated when heifers were fed the SFC diet (P < 0.001; Fig. 1d). In contrast, the proportion of isobutyrate (P < 0.001; Fig. 1d), isovalerate (P = 0.039; Fig. 1d) and the acetate-to-propionate ratio (P < 0.001) were significantly decreased when heifers were fed the SFC diet. The acetate proportion tended to be lower in the heifers fed the SFC diet than in the heifers fed the FGC diet (P = 0.067; Fig. 1d). The ruminal pH was not affected by the different corn processing methods (P = 0.193; Fig. 1d). The SFC diet significantly reduced the NH3-N production (P = 0.007; Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure1

Effects of different corn processed methods (steam flaked corn (SFC) and finely ground corn (FGC)) on rumen fermentation characteristics and growth performance of dairy heifers. a average daily gain; b NH3-N in rumen fluid; c pH in rumen fluid; d total VFA; e acetate; f propionate; g butyrate; h isobutyrate; i valerate; j isovalerate; k acetate-to-propionate ratio

Assessment of the population diversity of the ruminal bacterial

A total of 1,507,527 high-quality DNA sequences were obtained from 26 rumen fluid samples. The average length of the sequence reads was 434 bp. High-quality reads were clustered using > 97% sequence identity into 1260 microbial OTUs. Alpha diversity indices indicted that the SFC diet significantly decreased the Shannon index (P = 0.010) and increased the Simpson index (P = 0.018) (Table 2).

Table 2 Alpha diversity indices for species richness, abundance, and population diversity in the rumen bacterial communities in heifers fed different corn processed corn diet

For further analysis of the difference in bacterial community diversity, PCoA based on unweighted UniFrac distance metrics and ANOSIM were conducted. The PCoA plots revealed a clear clustering between samples from the SFC and FGC groups (Fig. 2), and the result of ANOSIM demonstrated that this difference reached a statistically significant level (R = 0.17, P = 0.006).

Fig. 2
figure2

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of rumen bacterial beta diversity for heifers fed steam flaked corn (SFC) or finely ground corn (FGC)

Ruminal microbiota composition

At the phylum level, 14 phyla were identified in the rumen samples. Among them, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla and accounted for 60.43% and 27.27% of the total sequences, respectively, followed by Actinobacteria (5.67%), Spirochaetae (4.34%), Tenericutes (1.25%) and Proteobacteria (0.62%) (Additional file 1: Table S1). At the genus level, 214 classifiable genera were detected in all samples. The dominant genera were Ruminococcaceae_UCG-005 (19.99%) and Bacteroides (7.14%), followed by norank_f__Bacteroidales_S24-7_group (6.20%), Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (5.46%), Bifidobacterium (5.12%), unclassified_f__Lachnospiraceae (4.89%), Treponema_2 (4.34%) and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 (3.04%) (Supplementary Table S2).

The ruminal microbiota differed between heifers fed the SFC and FGC diets

The relative abundances of ruminal bacteria at the phylum level revealed the significant effects of corn processing methods on Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Fig. 3). The SFC diet significantly increased the relative abundance the phylum Proteobacteria (P = 0.001) and tended to increase Firmicutes (P = 0.083). However, no significant differences were observed in other phyla, including the second most abundant phyla Bacteroidetes (P = 0.907) between the SFC and FGC diets.

Fig. 3
figure3

Comparison of the distribution of rumen bacteria with significant effects at the phylum level for heifers fed steam flaked corn (SFC) or finely ground corn (FGC) diets based on 16S rRNA sequences compared to the SILVA version 128 database. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean

Separation and analysis of the sequencing data were also performed at the genus level, with a total of 10 genera affected by the corn processing methods (Table 3). Of these, 7 genera belonging to Firmicutes were found, including Roseburia (P = 0.037), Blautia (P < 0.001), Marvinbryantia (P = 0.011), [Ruminococcus]_gauvreauii_group (P = 0.027) and unclassified_o__Clostridiales (P = 0.066), which were significantly higher or tended to be higher in heifers fed the SFC diet than FGC diet. In contrast, Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 (P = 0.036) and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-013 (P = 0.002) were decreased in heifers with the SFC diet. The SFC diet significantly increased the relative abundance of Succinivibrio (phylum Proteobacteria) and tended to increase norank_f__Bacteroidales_S24-7_group (phylum Bacteroidetes), but decreased the relative abundance of Alistipes (P = 0.003, 0.091 and 0.022, respectively).

Table 3 Percent relative abundance of genera with a significant effect of diet with steam flaked corn (SFC) or finely ground corn (FGC)

Association of ruminal bacteria and metabolites

To investigate the correlation between metabolites and the changes in the rumen microbiota in different groups, we conducted an association analysis (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients) of the phenotypic module to detect significantly different rumen microbiota. Furthermore, total VFA, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, isovalerate, valerate, acetate-to-propionate ratios, NH3-N, and pH were correlated with the rumen microbiota. Unless otherwise indicated, significant correlations are considered a P value of ≤ 0.05, whereas highly significant results are considered a P value of ≤ 0.001. As shown in Fig. 4, the results are summarized in a heatmap. The correlation analysis showed that the relative abundance of Succinivibrio was positively correlated with propionate, but negatively correlated with NH3-N. Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, and Faecalibactrium were negatively correlated with total VFA. Turicibacter was positively correlated with acetate. Blautia and [Ruminococcus]_gauvreauii_group were positively correlated with propionate, but Ruminococcaceae_UCG_014 was negatively correlated with propionate. In addition, Coprococcus_3, Phascolarctobacterium and unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae were negatively correlated with butyrate. Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and [Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group were negatively correlated with valerate. [Ruminococcus]_gauvreauii_group was negatively correlated with NH3-N.

Fig. 4
figure4

Correlation between the relative abundances of bacterial genus level and the fermentation characteristics (top 40 genus). Total VFA, total volatile fatty acid; AP, acetate-to-propionate ration; AN, NH3-N. * means 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05, **means 0.001 < P ≤ 0.01

Predicted functional profiles of the rumen bacterial community

The functional profile of the rumen bacterial community was predicted using PICRUSt using level 3 of KEGG orthologs. As shown in Fig. 5, compared with the FGC diet, the SFC diet increased the abundance of carbohydrate transport and metabolism (P = 0.034), transcription (P = 0.005), extracellular structures (P < 0.001) and defense mechanisms (P = 0.003), whereas it decreased the abundance of translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (P = 0.022) and posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones (P = 0.003).

Fig. 5
figure5

Comparison of the distribution of the abundance of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of rumen bacterial community for heifers fed steam flaked corn (SFC) or finely ground corn (FGC) diets. Only the significantly affected KEGG pathways by dietary treatments are shown

Discussion

Dietary composition plays a predominant role in determining both the community structure and the metabolic function of the rumen microbiota (Petri et al. 2013). However, the influence of different physical corn processing methods on the rumen bacterial community composition and their relationship with ruminal metabolites remain largely unknown. In particularly, ruminants usually perform better when fed SFC diets than FGC diets. The steam flaking processing method results in a more complete gelatinization than the grinding method and increases starch availability (Svihus et al. 2005), further significantly increasing ruminally degradable starch (Davies et al. 2013; Shen et al. 2015; Luo et al. 2017). Therefore, we hypothesized that the steam flaking processing method may modulate microbial fermentation due to the changes in the patterns of substrate availability for rumen microbiota.

When fermented, fiber, starch and sugar could yield VFA (Owens and Basalan 2016). Analyses of the energetic efficiency of metabolized VFA from glucose have shown that propionate is the most efficient one, followed by butyrate and acetate (Ryle and Ørskov 1990). In the present study, a similar total VFA concentration in heifers fed SFC and FGC was observed. Consistent with our study, the total rumen VFA production was similar to animals fed FGC or SFC (Corona et al. 2005; Shen et al. 2015). The SFC diet provided higher propionate concentrations in the rumen than the FGC diet, which led to a lower acetate-to-propionate ratio in heifers fed SFC diet. A potential explanation for this result is that the starch in corn experiences different degrees of exposure to enzymatic attack in the rumen (Beauchemin et al. 1994; Huntington 1997). In addition, a previous study reported that the propionate concentration and the propionate-to-acetate ratio in efficient cows were significantly higher than those in inefficient groups (Shabat et al. 2016), which indicated that steam-flaking corn is a more efficient processing method than grinding corn for cows. Moreover, the increased rumen propionate concentration could decrease the hydrogen availability for methanogenesis and increase the precursors available for gluconeogenesis in animals, ultimately improving feed efficiency (Li and Guan 2017; Li et al. 2018). This may explain why the SFC diet performed better than the FGC diet, as supported by the SFC group having a greater ADG than the FGC group in our study. The ruminal NH3-N concentration was lower in heifers fed the SFC diet than those fed the FGC diet, which was reported in a previous study (Zhong et al. 2008; Davies et al. 2013). In addition, the reduced ruminal NH3-N concentration in the SFC group could be related to the improved efficiency of microbial crude protein synthesis (Shen et al. 2015), because the dietary energy and nitrogen were synchronously supplied for rumen metabolism.

Rumen metabolite changes are the outcome of microbiome structures, because many studies have shown that the alterations in the microbial community affects microbial metabolites. Therefore, the microbial structure was further studied. The SFC diet was associated with a decrease in community diversity, with a reduced Shannon index and increased Simpson index. It’s consistent with previous studies that low richness and diversity tends to be associated with host feed efficiency (Shabat et al. 2016), and also the low richness and diversity has been reported to be related to increased energy harvest from feed in obese humans (Turnbaugh et al. 2009; Le Chatelier et al. 2013).

As indicated by the separation of sample points from the two groups in the PCoA plots and ANOSIM, the composition of the rumen bacterial community was also significantly diverse. Generally, the changes were mainly reflected by an increase in the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, genera Bacteroidales_S24-7_group, Roseburia, Blautia, Marvinbryantia, [Ruminococcus]_gauvreauii_group, Unclassified_o__Clostridiales and Succinivibrio and a decrease in genera Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, Alistipes and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-013. The numbers of the phylum Firmicutes are involved in the degradation of starch (Kaoutari et al. 2013). The relative abundance of Proteobacteria was increased linearly in dairy heifers fed increasing dietary concentration levels (Zhang et al. 2018a), or it was found at relatively higher levels in cattle offered high concentrates diets (Auffret et al. 2017). The alteration in the genus Succinivibrio (phylum Proteobacteria) was also observed in this study, and Succinivibrio appears to be a major fermenter of dextrins (Bryant 2015). The abundance of Succinivibrio is usually relatively higher when cattle or sheep are fed high-grain diets containing large amounts of starch or rapidly fermentable carbohydrates (Bryant and Small 1956; Wozny et al. 1977; Kim et al. 2014; Henderson et al. 2015; Plaizier et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2018b). Interestingly, an increased abundance of Succinivibrio species in the rumen was linked to the reduced methane emissions in cattle (Holman and Gzyl 2019). It has been suggested that Succinivibrio could utilize hydrogen to synthesize succinate, therefore lowering the amount of hydrogen available to methanogens for methane production, and succinate can be further decarboxylated to form propionate (Hespell 1992; Pope et al. 2011). Consistent with the ruminal microbial metabolites, the SFC diet significantly increased the propionate proportion, and the correlation analysis showed that the abundance of Succinivibrio was significantly positively correlated with the propionate concentration. For the genus Roseburia, which could hydrolyze and ferment starch (Stanton et al. 2015), the abundance was increased linearly with increasing dietary concentration levels (Zhang et al. 2018a). Blautia utilizes carbohydrates as fermentable substrates (Park et al. 2013), and its abundance was positively correlated with the propionate concentration in our study. Thus, we suggest that Blautia might ferment starch and produce propionate as an end product. Additionally, Blautia was noted as the only changed genus related to steer’s feed efficiency, and steers with greater ADG had greatest abundance of it (Myer et al. 2015). The increased Blautia abundance may be also related to the increased milk efficiency in dairy cows fed an SFC diet (Guyton et al. 2003; Cooke et al. 2008). Blautia can mediate beneficial anti-inflammatory effects on acute graft-versus-host diseases (Jenq et al. 2015), which is possible to explain why Blautia aided host. When examining the association between bacterial community and the utilization efficiency of nitrogen in goats, the abundance of Bacteroidales_S24-7_group was observed higher in the high-nitrogen-utilization phenotype group than in the low-nitrogen-utilization phenotype group (Wang et al. 2019). In our study, the NH3-N concentration was much lower in the SFC group, which indicated that the Bacteroidales_S24-7_group genus efficiently converted non-protein nitrogen to microbial proteins and improved microbial protein synthesis. Moreover, the PICRUSt predictions results also showed that the genes responsible for carbohydrate transport and metabolism, defense mechanisms and transcription were upregulated in the SFC diet. This may explain the fact that the SFC diet increased the amount of starch digested in the rumen and thereby improved the ruminal nitrogen utilization efficiency.

Corresponding to the increase in amylolytic bacteria, the relative abundance of cellulolytic bacteria was decreased with the SFC diet. As expected, the abundances of Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-013, which are genera defined as cellulose- and hemicellulose-degrading bacteria within the rumen (Flint et al. 2008; Singh et al. 2014), were significantly decreased with the SFC diet. Ruminococcus is considered to be the most important fiber-degrading bacterium in the intestine of herbivores, and produces large amounts of cellulolytic enzymes, including exoglucanases, endoglucanase, glucosidases and hemicellulases (Singh et al. 2014). In contrast to Blautia, the correlation analysis of the genera and rumen metabolites showed that Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 was negatively correlated with the propionate concentration, which is the main end product of starch fermented by amylolytic bacteria. In addition, the genus Alistipes might also be specifically involved in fiber degradation (Peng et al. 2015). In a previous study, high abundances of Alistipes and Ruminococcus in buffalo and cattle were associated with fiber degradation (Zhang et al. 2017). The additional functions of these unclassified bacteria are not clear, and hence, more research is needed to determine their roles in the process of starch and fiber degradation. Such studies will help us to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the different animal performances between those fed SFC and FGC diets. However, with the current limited availability of knowledge, we can infer that the increased rumen propionate concentration produced by amylolytic bacteria contributes to the increased efficiency of dairy heifers with high ADG when fed the SFG diet.

In summary, our results suggested that steam flaked corn promoted the increased abundance of amylolytic bacteria, especially the genus Succinivibrio, thereby increasing propionate production. Propionate is the highest energetic efficiency metabolite for ruminant hosts, and thus, dairy heifers with increased propionate concentration exhibited relatively higher average daily gain. This study provides comparative evidence for the mechanism underlying the enhanced performance of ruminants fed steam flaked corn.

Availability of data and materials

We declared that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for noncommercial purpose, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Abbreviations

SFC:

steam flaked corn

FGC:

finely ground corn

VFA:

volatile fatty acid

NH3-N:

ammonia nitrogen

ADG:

average daily gain

OUT:

operational taxonomic unit

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

References

  1. AOAC International (2002) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. AOAC International, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Auffret MD, Dewhurst RJ, Duthie C-A, Rooke JA, Wallace RJ, Freeman TC, Stewart R, Watson M, Roehe R (2017) The rumen microbiome as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity genes is directly affected by diet in beef cattle. Microbiome 5:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0378-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA, Dong Y, Farr BI, Cheng KJ (1994) Effects of mastication on digestion of whole cereal grains by cattle. J Anim Sci 72:236–246. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.721236x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant MP (2015) Succinivibrio. In: Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria. American Cancer Society. pp 1–3

  6. Bryant MP, Small N (1956) Characteristics of two new genera of anaerobic curved rods isolated from the rumen of cattle. J Bacteriol 72:22–26

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaney AL, Marbach EP (1962) Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 8:130–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen KH, Huber JT, Theurer CB, Swingle RS, Simas J, Chan SC, Wu Z, Sullivan JL (1994) Effect of steam flaking of corn and sorghum grains on performance of lactating cows1. J Dairy Sci 77:1038–1043. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77039-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooke KM, Bernard JK, West JW (2008) Performance of dairy cows fed annual ryegrass silage and corn silage with steam-flaked or ground corn. J Dairy Sci 91:2417–2422. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0715

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corona L, Rodriguez S, Ware RA, Pas RAZ (2005) Comparative effects of whole, ground, dry-rolled, and steam-flaked corn on digestion and growth performance in feedlot cattle. Prof Anim Sci 21:200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies KL, McKinnon JJ, Mutsvangwa T (2013) Effects of dietary ruminally degradable starch and ruminally degradable protein levels on urea recycling, microbial protein production, nitrogen balance, and duodenal nutrient flow in beef heifers fed low crude protein diets. Can J Anim Sci 93:123–136. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-062

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ertl P, Zebeli Q, Zollitsch W, Knaus W (2016) Feeding of wheat bran and sugar beet pulp as sole supplements in high-forage diets emphasizes the potential of dairy cattle for human food supply. J Dairy Sci 99:1228–1236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferraretto LF, Crump PM, Shaver RD (2013) Effect of cereal grain type and corn grain harvesting and processing methods on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows through a meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 96:533–550

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Rincon MT, Lamed R, White BA (2008) Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1817

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guyton AD, Mckinney JM, Knowlton KF (2003) The effect of steam-flaked or dry ground corn and supplemental phytic acid on phosphorus partitioning and ruminal phytase activity in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 86:3972–3982

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Zunino P, Abecia L, Angarita E, Aravena P, Arenas GN (2015) Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep 5:14567

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hespell RB (1992) The Genera Succinivibrio and Succinimonas. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H (eds) The Prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications. Springer, New York, pp 3979–3982

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holman DB, Gzyl KE (2019) A meta-analysis of the bovine gastrointestinal tract microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hua C, Tian J, Tian P, Cong R, Luo Y, Geng Y, Tao S, Ni Y, Zhao R (2017) Feeding a high concentration diet induces unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota and host response in a goat model. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Huntington GB (1997) Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk. J Anim Sci 75:852–867

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Imhasly S, Naegeli H, Baumann S, von Bergen M, Luch A, Jungnickel H, Potratz S, Gerspach C (2014) Metabolomic biomarkers correlating with hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows. BMC Vet Res 10:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-122

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I (2013) Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J 7:1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jenq RR, Taur Y, Devlin SM, Ponce DM, Goldberg JD, Ahr KF, Littmann ER et al (2015) Intestinal Blautia is associated with reduced death from graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21:1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaoutari AE, Armougom F, Gordon JI, Raoult D, Henrissat B (2013) The abundance and variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the human gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3050

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim M, Kim J, Kuehn LA, Bono JL, Berry ED, Kalchayanand N, Freetly HC, Benson AK, Wells JE (2014) Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J Anim Sci 92:683–694. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6841

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kotarski SF, Waniska RD, Thurn KK (1992) Starch hydrolysis by the ruminal microflora. J Nutr 122:178–190

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney CS (2003) Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:663–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00072-X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, Almeida M, Arumugam M, Batto J-M, Kennedy S, Leonard P et al (2013) Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500:541–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12506

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee RW, Galyean ML, Lofgreen GP (1982) Effect of mixing whole shelled and steam flaked corn in finishing diets on feedlot performance and site and extent of digestion in beef steers. J Anim Sci 55:475–483. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.553475x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li F, Guan LL (2017) Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00061. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00061-17

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li F, Yang XJ, Cao YC, Li SX, Yao JH, Li ZJ, Sun FF (2014) Effects of dietary effective fiber to rumen degradable starch ratios on the risk of sub-acute ruminal acidosis and rumen content fatty acids composition in dairy goat. Anim Feed Sci Technol 189:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.12.011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Z, Liu N, Cao Y, Jin C, Li F, Cai C, Yao J (2018) Effects of fumaric acid supplementation on methane production and rumen fermentation in goats fed diets varying in forage and concentrate particle size. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 9:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0235-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Luo G, Xu W, Yang J, Li Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Lin C, Zhang Y (2017) Effects of ruminally degradable starch levels on performance, nitrogen balance, and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows fed low corn-based starch diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 30:653–659

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma C, Sun Z, Zeng B, Huang S, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Su X, Xu J, Wei H, Zhang H (2018) Cow-to-mouse fecal transplantations suggest intestinal microbiome as one cause of mastitis. Microbiome 6:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0578-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Magoč T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Malmuthuge N, Guan LL (2017) Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0135-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall A, Cowan S, Edwards S, Griffiths I, Howarth C, Langdon T, White E (2013) Crops that feed the world 9. Oats—a cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications. Food Secur 5:13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0232-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. May ML, Quinn MJ, Reinhardt CD, Murray L, Gibson ML, Karges KK, Drouillard JS (2009) Effects of dry-rolled or steam-flaked corn finishing diets with or without twenty-five percent dried distillers grains on ruminal fermentation and apparent total tract digestion. J Anim Sci 87:3630–3638

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. May ML, DeClerck JC, Quinn MJ, DiLorenzo N, Leibovich J, Smith DR, Hales KE, Galyean ML (2010) Corn or sorghum wet distillers grains with solubles in combination with steam-flaked corn: feedlot cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and apparent total tract digestibility. J Anim Sci 88:2433–2443. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2487

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McAllister TA, Bae HD, Jones GA, Cheng K-J (1994) Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J Anim Sci 72:3004–3018. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72113004x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miyaji M, Nonaka K (2018) Effects of altering total mixed ration conservation method when feeding dry-rolled versus steam-flaked hulled rice on lactation and digestion in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 101:5092–5101. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13802

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Myer PR, Wells JE, Smith TPL, Kuehn LA, Freetly HC (2015) Cecum microbial communities from steers differing in feed efficiency. J Anim Sci 93:5327–5340. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9415

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. NRC (2001) Nutrient requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev edn. Natl Acad Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  45. Owens FN, Basalan M (2016) Ruminal Fermentation. In: Millen DD, De Beni Arrigoni M, Lauritano Pacheco RD (eds) Rumenology. Springer, Cham, pp 63–102

    Google Scholar 

  46. Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR (1997) The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review. J Anim Sci 75:868–879. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.753868x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Park S-K, Kim M-S, Bae J-W (2013) Blautia faecis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:599–603. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.036541-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG (2014) STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30:3123–3124. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Paz HA, Anderson CL, Muller MJ, Kononoff PJ, Fernando SC (2016) Rumen bacterial community composition in holstein and jersey cows is different under same dietary condition and is not affected by sampling method. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Peng B, Huang S, Liu T, Geng A (2015) Bacterial xylose isomerases from the mammal gut Bacteroidetes cluster function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for effective xylose fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 14:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0253-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Petri RM, Schwaiger T, Penner GB, Beauchemin KA, Forster RJ, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA (2013) Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge. PLoS ONE 8:e83424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083424

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Plaizier JC, Li S, Danscher AM, Derakshani H, Andersen PH, Khafipour E (2017) Changes in microbiota in rumen digesta and feces due to a grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) challenge. Microb Ecol 74:485–495

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pope PB, Smith W, Denman SE, Tringe SG, Barry K, Hugenholtz P, McSweeney CS, McHardy AC, Morrison M (2011) Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from tammar wallabies. Science 333:646–648. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205760

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ryle M, Ørskov ER (1990) Towards future feed evaluation systems. In: Ryle M, Ørskov ER (eds) Energy nutrition in ruminants. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  55. Safaei K, Yang W (2017) Effects of grain processing with focus on grinding and steam- flaking on dairy cow performance. Herbivores. https://doi.org/10.5772/67344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shabat SKB, Sasson G, Doron-Faigenboim A, Durman T, Yaacoby S, Berg Miller ME, White BA, Shterzer N, Mizrahi I (2016) Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME J 10:2958–2972. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.62

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Shen JS, Song LJ, Sun HZ, Wang B, Chai Z, Chacher B, Liu JX (2015) Effects of corn and soybean meal types on rumen fermentation, nitrogen metabolism and productivity in dairy cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 28:351–359

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Singh BK, Quince C, Macdonald CA, Khachane A, Thomas N, Al-Soud WA, Sørensen SJ, He Z, White D, Sinclair A, Crooks B, Zhou J, Campbell CD (2014) Loss of microbial diversity in soils is coincident with reductions in some specialized functions. Environ Microbiol 16:2408–2420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stanton TB, Duncan SH, Flint HJ (2015) Roseburia. In: Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria. American Cancer Society, pp 1–7

  60. Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM (2005) Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 122:303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI (2009) A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457:480–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07540

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Uyeno Y, Shigemori S, Shimosato T (2015) Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microbes Environ 30:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang L, Liu K, Wang Z, Bai X, Peng Q, Jin L (2019) Bacterial community diversity associated with different utilization efficiencies of nitrogen in the gastrointestinal tract of goats. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wozny MA, Bryant MP, Holdeman LV, Moore WE (1977) Urease assay and urease-producing species of anaerobes in the bovine rumen and human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1097–1104

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang J, Xu C, Huo D, Hu Q, Peng Q (2017) Comparative study of the gut microbiome potentially related to milk protein in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and Chinese Holstein cattle. Sci Rep 7:42189. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42189

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang J, Shi H, Wang Y, Cao Z, Yang H, Li S (2018a) Effect of limit-fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios on fecal bacterial and archaeal community composition in holstein heifers. Front Microbiol 9:976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang RY, Jin W, Feng PF, Liu JH, Mao SY (2018b) High-grain diet feeding altered the composition and functions of the rumen bacterial community and caused the damage to the laminar tissues of goats. Animal 12:2511–2520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111800040X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhong RZ, Li JG, Gao YX, Tan ZL, Ren GP (2008) Effects of substitution of different levels of steam-flaked corn for finely ground corn on lactation and digestion in early lactation dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91:3931–3937

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhu Z, Noel SJ, Difford GF, Al-Soud WA, Brejnrod A, Sørensen SJ, Lassen J, Løvendahl P, Højberg O (2017) Community structure of the metabolically active rumen bacterial and archaeal communities of dairy cows over the transition period. PLoS ONE 12:e0187858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187858

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E (2008) Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:723–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zinn RA, Owens FN, Ware RA (2002) Flaking corn: processing mechanics, quality standards, and impacts on energy availability and performance of feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 80:1145–1156

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Appreciation is extended to the staff of Modern Farm (Baoji, China) for their assistance in animal care. The authors also acknowledge the member’s input of the Innovative Research Team of Animal Nutrition & Healthy of Northwest A&F University during the collection periods and sample analysis.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award No. 2017YFD0500500) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award No. 31672451 and 31472122).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HR, YCC, SRW, HRW and JHY conceived and designed the experiments; HR, XDS, HXB, JBL and ZD mainly performed the experiments; HR, YTY, XJL, and CJC analyzed the data; JHY contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; HR wrote the manuscript. JHY had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhu Yao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All of the calves and the experimental protocol in this study were approved by the Institution Animal Care and Use Committee of the Northwest A&F University (protocol number NWAFAC1008). Authors declare no ethical problems.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Summary of the relative abundance of phyla; Table S2. Summary of the relative abundance of genera.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, H., Su, X., Bai, H. et al. Specific enrichment of microbes and increased ruminal propionate production: the potential mechanism underlying the high energy efficiency of Holstein heifers fed steam-flaked corn. AMB Expr 9, 209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0937-8

Download citation

Keyword

  • Steam-flaked corn
  • Finely ground corn
  • Rumen microbes
  • Rumen metabolites