- Original article
- Open Access
Efficient direct ethanol production from cellulose by cellulase- and cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae
© Yamada et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 3 May 2013
- Accepted: 18 June 2013
- Published: 24 June 2013
Efficient degradation of cellulosic biomass requires the synergistic action of the cellulolytic enzymes endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase. Although there are many reports describing consolidation of hydrolysis and fermentation steps using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae that express cellulolytic enzymes, the efficiency of cellulose degradation has not been sufficiently improved. Although the yeast S. cerevisiae cannot take up cellooligosaccharide, some fungi can take up and assimilate cellooligosaccharide through a cellodextrin transporter. In this study, a S. cerevisiae strain co-expressing genes for several cell surface display cellulases and the cellodextrin transporter was constructed for the purpose of improving the efficiency of direct ethanol fermentation from phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC). The cellulase/cellodextrin transporter-coexpressing strain produced 1.7-fold more ethanol (4.3 g/L) from PASC during a 72-h fermentation than did a strain expressing cellulase only (2.5 g/L). Direct ethanol production from PASC by the recombinant S. cerevisiae strain was improved by co-expression of cellulase display and cellodextrin transporter genes. These results suggest that cellulase- and cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing S. cerevisiae could be a promising technology for efficient direct ethanol production from cellulose.
- Cellodextrin transporter
- Cell surface display
Dwindling petroleum supplies and growing environmental concerns over petroleum use have led to increasing interest in development of biomass as a feedstock for liquid fuels. Bioethanol produced from biomass resources holds particular promise as an alternative fuel or gasoline extender. Currently, starch-rich biomass serves as the main feedstock used for bioethanol production as it is rapidly hydrolyzed by amylases, resulting in a high yield of glucose. However, lignocellulosic biomasses, such as sugar cane bagasse, corn stover, rice and wheat straw, switchgrass, and poplar, are also regarded as promising starting materials for bioethanol production because they are abundant, inexpensive, renewable, and have favorable environmental properties (Adsul et al. 2011; Sánchez and Cardona 2008). Despite these advantages, lignocellulosic biomass is much more expensive to process than grains because of the need for extensive pretreatment and relatively large amounts of cellulase enzymes for efficient hydrolysis. Therefore, more efficient and cost-effective methods for the degradation and fermentation of cellulosic biomass to ethanol are required.
Efficient degradation of cellulosic biomass requires the synergistic action of the cellulolytic enzymes endoglucanase (EG), cellobiohydrolase (CBH), and β-glucosidase (BGL). Although there are many reports describing relatively low-cost ethanol production from cellulosic material by consolidation of the hydrolysis and fermentation steps using recombinant microorganisms such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to express cellulolytic enzymes, the cellulose degradation efficiency has not been sufficiently improved (la Grange et al. 2010; Lynd et al. 2005; Yamada et al. 2013). We previously developed a simple method, designated cocktail δ-integration, to optimize the level of cellulase expression for cellulose degradation (Yamada et al. 2010b). In the cocktail δ-integration method, various cellulase expression cassettes are integrated into yeast chromosomes simultaneously in one step, such that strains exhibiting high cellulolytic activity (i.e., strains expressing an optimum ratio of cellulases) can be easily obtained. Use of this method significantly improved the phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC)-degradation activity of cellulase-displaying S. cerevisiae, a microorganism that shows tremendous promise for efficient ethanol production from cellulose.
Although yeast such as S. cerevisiae cannot take up cellooligosaccharides, some fungi, such as Neurospora crassa, can take up and assimilate cellooligosaccharides through a cellodextrin transporter, facilitating rapid growth on cellulose (Tian et al. 2009). Galazka et al. (2010) were the first to report that expression of the N. crassa cellodextrin transporter gene enables S. cerevisiae to assimilate cellooligosaccharide. The resulting yeast strain could produce ethanol from cellooligosaccharide directly. Furthermore, addition of a cellulase reagent allowed for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation from cellulose, resulting in more efficient ethanol production compared to the wild type strain.
In this study, a S. cerevisiae strain that co-expresses genes for cell surface-displayed cellulases and a cellodextrin transporter was constructed in order to improve the efficiency and yield of direct ethanol production from cellulose. Direct ethanol fermentation from PASC was also examined.
Strains and media
Characteristics of the E. coli and S. cerevisiae strains and plasmids used in this study
Strains and plasmids
E. coli strain
endA1 hsdR17(r K12 - m K12 + ) supE44 thi-I gyrA96 relA1 lac recA1/F’[proAB + lacI q Z∆M15::Tn10(Tetr)]
S. cerevisiae yeast strains
MATa ade leu2 his3 ura3 trp1
Tajima et al. (1985)
MATa ade leu2 his3 ura3, Cocktail δ-integration of β-glucosidase, endoglucanase, and cellobiohydrolase genes
Yamada et al. (2010b)
MATa ade leu2 his3 trp1, Cocktail δ-integration of intracellular β-glucosidase and cellodextrin transporter genes
MATa ade leu2, Cocktail δ-integration of β-glucosidase, endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, intracellular β-glucosidase, and cellodextrin transporter genes
URA3, Expression of cellodextrin transporter by δ-integration
URA3, Expression of intracellular β-glucosidase by δ-integration
HIS3, Expression of intracellular β-glucosidase by δ-integration
Polymerase chain reaction primers used in this study
The δ-integrative plasmid for expression of cellodextrin transporter gene CDTI from N. crassa was constructed as follows. The DNA fragment encoding CDTI was amplified from N. crassa strain NBRC 6068 cDNA using the primers CDT(F) and CDT(R). The fragment was then inserted into the plasmid pδUPGSecAG linearized by Nhe I/Spe I using In-Fusion cloning kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). The resulting plasmid was named pδUPGCDTI.
The δ-integrative plasmid for intracellular expression of BGL1 was constructed as follows. The DNA fragment encoding A. aculeatus BGL1 gene without its secretion signal sequence was amplified from plasmid pδU-PGAGBGL (Yamada et al. 2010b) using the primers UiBGL(F) and UiBGL(R). The fragment was then inserted into the plasmid pδUPGSecAG linearized by Nhe I/Spe I using In-Fusion cloning kit. The resulting plasmid was named pδUPGiBGL.
Plasmid pδHPGiBGL, which was used for intracellular expression of BGL1, was constructed as follows. The gene cassette for intracellular BGL1 expression encoding the S. cerevisiae PGK1 promoter, the A. aculeatus BGL1 gene, and the PGK1 terminator was amplified from pδUPGiBGL by PCR using the primers HiBGL(F) and HiBGL(R). The resulting fragment was inserted into the plasmid pδH (Yamada et al. 2010) linearized by Not I using In-Fusion cloning kit. The resulting plasmid was named pδHPGiBGL.
Identical amounts (about 20 μg) of each of two comarked δ-integrative plasmids (pδUPGCDT and pδUPGiBGL, which allow expression of CDT and intracellular BGL1, respectively) were mixed and co-transferred into MT8-1, and the resulting strain was named MT8-1/δCDTiBGL.
A cellulase enzyme expression-optimized strain (MT8-1/cocδBEC1) capable of expressing the enzymes EG, CBH, and BGL was constructed using the cocktail δ-integration method, as described previously (Yamada et al. 2010b). Identical amounts (about 20 μg) of each of two comarked δ-integrative plasmids (pδUPGCDT and pδHPGiBGL, which allow expression of CDT and intracellular BGL1, respectively) were mixed and co-transferred into MT8-1/cocδBEC1, and resulting strain was named MT8-1/cocδBEC1/δCDTiBGL.
Ethanol fermentation from cellobiose
Yeast cells were precultured aerobically in YPD medium at 30°C for 24 h, harvested by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min, and then washed twice with distilled water. The wet-cell weight was then determined by harvesting the washed cells by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 5 min and weighing the cell pellet (the estimated dry-cell weight for all strains was approximately 0.15-times the wet-cell weight). The cells were then resuspended to an initial cell concentration of 200 g wet cells/L in 20 mL of YP medium containing 20 g/L of cellobiose. Ethanol fermentation proceeded at 30°C for 96 h with mild agitation in 100-mL closed bottles, each equipped with a siliconized tube and check valve (Sanplatec Corp., Osaka, Japan) as a CO2 outlet. Ethanol, glucose, and cellobiose concentrations were measured simultaneously using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Shim-pack SPR-Pb column (Shimadzu) maintained at 80°C. The column was eluted with water as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min, and the eluate was monitored using a refractive index detector (Shimadzu, RID10A). Culture broth was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min, and a sample of the resulting supernatant was analyzed by HPLC.
PASC degradation activity
To examine PASC degradation activity, yeast cells were cultivated in YPD medium for 24 h at 30°C, collected by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, and then washed twice with distilled water. Washed cells were added to a 1-mL solution of 5 g/L PASC in 50 mmol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 5.0). After the hydrolysis reaction was allowed to proceed for 6 h at 50°C, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 × g at 4°C to remove cells and debris, and the concentration of the glucose produced was measured using a Glucose CII Test (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). One unit of PASC degradation activity was defined as the amount of enzyme producing 1 μmol glucose/min at 50°C and pH 5.0.
Quantification of cellulolytic enzyme gene transcription using real-time PCR
The transcription level of each cellulase gene as well as that of the CDT gene was quantified using real-time reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Total RNA was isolated from yeast cells cultivated in YPD medium for 24 h at 30°C using a RiboPure Yeast Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and cDNA was then synthesized from total RNA using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Real-time RT-PCR using synthesized cDNA as a template was performed using a Stratagene MX3000P qPCR system (Agilent/Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) with four sets of PCR primers (BGL761(F) and BGL858(R), EGII968(F) and EGII1043(R), CBHII387(F) and CBHII455(R), and CDTI690(F) and CDTI761(R)) and Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo). The primers BGL761(F) and BGL858(R) were constructed for detecting both intracellular BGL1 gene transcription and surface displayed BGL1 gene transcription. Transcription levels of the target genes were normalized to the housekeeping gene PGK1 using a standard curve method.
Ethanol fermentation from PASC
Yeast cells were precultured aerobically in YPD medium at 30°C for 72 h, harvested by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min, and then washed twice with distilled water. The wet-cell weight was then determined by harvesting the washed cells by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 5 min and weighing the cell pellet. The cells were then resuspended to an initial cell concentration of 200-g wet cells/L in 20 mL of YP medium containing 20 g/L of PASC. Ethanol fermentation proceeded at 37°C for 96 h with mild agitation in 100-mL closed bottles, each equipped with a siliconized tube and check valve as a CO2 outlet. Ethanol concentration was determined using a gas chromatograph (model GC-2010; Shimadzu) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Durabond Free Fatty Acid Phase (DB-FFAP) column (60 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter; 0.5 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas. The injection volume and split ratio were adjusted to 1 μL and 1:50, respectively. The column temperature was programmed to increase from 40°C to 170°C with a linear gradient of 10°C/min.
Co-expression of cellodextrin transporter and β-glucosidase
Cellulase activity of the cellodextrin transporter/cellulase-co-expressing strain
Quantification of the transcription level of cellulolytic enzyme genes using real-time RT-PCR
Ethanol production from PASC by the cellodextrin transporter/cellulase-co-expressing yeast strain
In this study, a S. cerevisiae strain co-expressing cellodextrin transporter and cellulase genes was constructed. This strain showed a higher level of ethanol production from PASC than a strain expressing only cellulase genes.
Galazka et al. (2010) were the first to report expression of the N. crassa cellodextrin transporter and β-glucosidase genes in S. cerevisiae, and subsequent ethanol production from cellobiose by that yeast strain. In this study, N. crassa cellodextrin transporter and A. aculeatus β-glucosidase, an enzyme with high specific activity (Decker et al. 2000; Takada et al. 1998), were co-expressed in S. cerevisiae, and this strain also produced ethanol. Intracellular expressed β-glucosidase activity was not detected in the medium (data not shown). Thus, intracellular expression of β-glucosidase could be effectively achieved. Large amounts of cellulolytic enzymes including cellulase and β-glucosidase are required for efficient degradation of cellulose. Thus, it would be important for efficient direct ethanol production from cellulose to express cellulolytic enzymes, which have high specific activity, such as A. aculeatus β-glucosidase used in this study.
As shown in Figure 3, the level of BGL1 transcription in the cellulase/cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing strain was higher than in the strain expressing only cellulase due to the fact that the genes encoding both the intracellular and extracellular forms of BGL are transcribed in the cellulase/cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing strain. Both intracellular and extracellular forms of BGL gene transcription were detected by the same set of primers BGL761(F) and BGL858(R). Although the cellulase/cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing strain expressed cellodextrin transporter and intracellular BGL, the level of EGII and CBHII transcription did not decrease in comparison to the strain expressing only cellulase. This result indicates the co-expressing strain has sufficient capacity to express more cellulolytic enzyme genes. Thus, increasing the number of integrated genes and/or diploidization could be promising strategies for improving cellulolytic activity in yeast (Yamada et al. 2009).
Although the PASC degradation activity and level of cellulase gene transcription of the cellulase/cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing strain was very similar to that of the strain expressing cellulase only (Figures 2 and 3), it produced more ethanol from PASC than did the strain expressing only cellulase (Figure 4). One explanation for this result could be that product inhibition was avoided. Gruno et al. (2004) and Xiao et al. (2004) reported that the activity of endoglucanase and β-glucosidase enzymes is inhibited by the respective products of these enzymes (cellobiose and glucose, respectively). Although the concentration of cellobiose and glucose were lower than the detection limit in this study, their concentrations could be decreased by introducing a bypass which is cellodextrin assimilating pass way by cellodextrin transporter and intracellular β-glucosidase. Product inhibition could thus be avoided and ethanol productivity improved. This product inhibition avoiding effect is in accordance with a previous study involving amylolytic yeast (Yamakawa et al. 2010). The authors of that report indicated that production of ethanol from raw starch can be improved by introducing a maltose transporter as a bypass. Galazka et al. (2010) used cellodextrin transporter-expressing S. cerevisiae for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation from cellulose with addition of cellulase. In contrast, in this study, the cellodextrin transporter was co-expressed with three different cellulase genes. As a result, direct ethanol production from cellulose was improved without the need for addition of cellulase. Thus, the use of S. cerevisiae that co-express cellodextrin transporter and cellulase genes is a promising strategy for direct ethanol fermentation from cellulose.
In conclusion, the ability of recombinant S. cerevisiae to ferment PASC was improved by engineering the organism to co-express genes encoding cell surface-displayed cellulases and the cellodextrin transporter gene. The ethanol production rate and amount of ethanol produced in this study were low compared to industrial production levels. However, construction of industrial cellulolytic yeast might be achieved in the future by combining techniques such as yeast diploidization with strategies to improve cellulolytic activity, such as optimizing the expression level of each cellulolytic enzyme gene (Yamada et al. 2010b2011).
This work was supported in part by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan; and by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan; and by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas (Innovative Bioproduction Kobe), MEXT, Japan.
- Adsul MG, Singhvi MS, Gaikaiwari SA, Gokhale DV: Development of biocatalysts for production of commodity chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102: 4304–4312. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Decker CH, Visser J, Schreier P: Beta-glucosidases from five black Aspergillus species: study of their physico-chemical and biocatalytic properties. J Agric Food Chem 2000, 48: 4929–4936. 10.1021/jf000434dPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Den Haan RS, Rose H, Lynd LR, van Zyl WH: Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Metab Eng 2007, 9: 87–94. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.08.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, Cate JH: Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 2010, 330: 84–86. 10.1126/science.1192838PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gruno M, Väljamäe P, Pettersson G, Johansson G: Inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulases by cellobiose is strongly dependent on the nature of the substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 86: 503–511. 10.1002/bit.10838PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- la Grange DC, den Haan R, van Zyl WH: Engineering cellulolytic ability into bioprocessing organisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87: 1195–1208. 10.1007/s00253-010-2660-xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M: Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16: 577–583. 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sánchez OJ, Cardona CA: Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99: 5270–5295. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tajima M, Nogi Y, Fukasawa T: Primary structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL7 gene. Yeast 1985, 1: 67–77. 10.1002/yea.320010108PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takada G, Kawaguchi T, Sumitani J, Arai M: Expression of Aspergillus aculeatus No. F-50 cellobiohydrolase I (cbhI) and beta-glucosidase 1 (bgl1) genes by Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1998, 62: 1615–1618. 10.1271/bbb.62.1615PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tian C, Beeson WT, Iavarone AT, Sun J, Marletta MA, Cate JH, Glass NL: Systems analysis of plant cell wall degradation by the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106: 22157–22162. 10.1073/pnas.0906810106PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN: Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2004, 113–116: 1115–1126.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamada R, Bito Y, Adachi T, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A: Efficient production of ethanol from raw starch by a mated diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae with integrated α-amylase and glucoamylase genes. Enzyme Microb Technol 2009, 44: 344–349. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.01.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A: Novel strategy for yeast construction using delta-integration and cell fusion to efficiently produce ethanol from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85: 1491–1498. 10.1007/s00253-009-2198-yPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A: Cocktail delta-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb Cell Fact 2010, 14: 32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A: Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials using a diploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with optimized cellulase expression. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4: 8. 10.1186/1754-6834-4-8PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamada R, Hasunuma T, Kondo A: Endowing non-cellulolytic microorganisms with cellulolytic activity aiming for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol Adv 2013. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.007Google Scholar
- Yamakawa S, Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Kondo A: Repeated batch fermentation from raw starch using a maltose transporter and amylase expressing diploid yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87: 109–115. 10.1007/s00253-010-2487-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamakawa S, Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Kondo A: Repeated fermentation from raw starch using Saccharomyces cerevisiae displaying both glucoamylase and α-amylase. Enzyme Microb Technol 2012, 50: 343–347. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.03.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.