Desiccation induces viable but Non-Culturable cells in Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021
© Vriezen et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 11 January 2012
Accepted: 20 January 2012
Published: 20 January 2012
Sinorhizobium meliloti is a microorganism commercially used in the production of e.g. Medicago sativa seed inocula. Many inocula are powder-based and production includes a drying step. Although S. meliloti survives drying well, the quality of the inocula is reduced during this process. In this study we determined survival during desiccation of the commercial strains 102F84 and 102F85 as well as the model strain USDA1021.
The survival of S. meliloti 1021 was estimated during nine weeks at 22% relative humidity. We found that after an initial rapid decline of colony forming units, the decline slowed to a steady 10-fold reduction in colony forming units every 22 days. In spite of the reduction in colony forming units, the fraction of the population identified as viable (42-54%) based on the Baclight live/dead stain did not change significantly over time. This change in the ability of viable cells to form colonies shows (i) an underestimation of the survival of rhizobial cells using plating methods, and that (ii) in a part of the population desiccation induces a Viable But Non Culturable (VBNC)-like state, which has not been reported before. Resuscitation attempts did not lead to a higher recovery of colony forming units indicating the VBNC state is stable under the conditions tested. This observation has important consequences for the use of rhizobia. Finding methods to resuscitate this fraction may increase the quality of powder-based seed inocula.
Rhizobia form root nodules in symbiosis with legumes in which they fix atmospheric nitrogen and supply the fixed nitrogen to the plants (Jones et al. 2007). This system can be used to replenish soils with biologically-fixed nitrogen, and reduces the need for chemical fertilizers and pollution. However, this process is affected by salinity, drought and desiccation stress (Zahran 1999; Vriezen et al. 2007). To make optimal use of this system, inoculants are employed which allow for close contact between the microorganisms and the germinating seed (Smith 1992; Kosanke et al. 1999; Deaker et al. 2004). Many inoculants are powder-based, and a drying step during production reduces their quality (Kosanke et al. 1992). According to Catroux et al. (2001) many inoculants remain unreliable because of the inability of bacterial cells to persist under adverse conditions, including desiccation.
Many conditions have been identified that affect the survival of agriculturally important Rhizobiaceae during desiccation (Vincent et al. 1962; Bushby and Marshall 1977 Some factors affecting the survival of root nodule bacteria on desiccation; van Rensburg and Strijdom 1980; Dye 1982; Salema et al 1982 Death of rhizobia on inoculated seed, 1982 Rupture of nodule bacteria on drying and rehydration; Kremer and Peterson 1983; Mary et al. 1985, 1986; Kosanke et al. 1992; Smith 1992; Chenu 1993; Boumahdi et al. 1999; Estrella et al. 2004; Kaci et al. 2005; Vriezen et al. 2006). These conditions include the intrageneric differences to cope with desiccation stress affecting survival (vanRensburg and Strijdom 1980; Mary et al. 1985, 1986; Trotman and Weaver 1995; Boumahdi et al. 1999; Sadowski and Graham 1998). All of these studies estimated the surviving fraction of cells using plate count techniques, however, it is possible that the number of surviving cells is not affected but just the ability to form colonies. For a long time it has been known that cells can enter a Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) state, which includes rhizobia (Manahan and Steck 1997, Alexander et al. 1999, Basaglia et al. 2007). The VBNC state is a state in which cells are viable, but do not form colonies. The induction of this physiological state is very relevant to field practices since rhizobial VBNC cells do not infect plants, while those able to form colonies do (Basaglia et al. 2007).
To be able to understand the fate of microorganisms in seed inocula that require a drying step, rhizobial cells need to be investigated under the limiting conditions they experience under desiccation stress. Therefore, we studied the fate of S. meliloti cells during desiccation stress from three days to nine weeks. We not only determined the number of surviving cells that are able to form colonies on regular growth media, but also estimated the surviving cells using direct counting techniques including the live/dead stain. Based on differences in results between these enumeration techniques, the results indicate that only a fraction of the living rhizobial cells are able to form colonies after desiccation suggesting that desiccation induces a VBNC state. The finding that desiccation induces a VBNC state in rhizobia has not been reported in the literature before. Finding methods to resuscitate the VBNC population may greatly enhance culturability of rhizobia, thus the quality of powder-based seed inocula.
Materials and methods
Materials, strains, growth and drying media
S. meliloti 1021 (Meade et al. 1982) was taken from our culture collection. Commercially available strains of 102F84 and 102F85 from the Novozyme collection (strain NRG-43 and NRG-185 by Rice (1982) respectively) were provided by R.S. Smith. The media used were Tryptone Yeast extract (TY, Beringer 1974), Yeast Extract Mannitol Broth (YMB, Atlas and Parks 1993), and Phosphate Mannitol Medium (PMM, Vriezen et al. 2006). The matrices used were Ottawa Sand Standard (1 g/microcentrifuge tube, 20-30 mesh, Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, New Jersey), alfalfa seeds were previously sterilized (Vriezen et al. 2006) and guaranteed untreated. (1 g/microcentrifuge tube, Outsidepride, BS-ALFALFA-5; Lot No: A2N-1769-3) and 0.45 μM nitrocellulose filters (25 mm diameter; Millipore, HA02500, Bedford, MA).
Assay to measure survival during desiccation
Survival during desiccation was determined using a method developed previously (Vriezen et al., 2006). Briefly, TY medium was inoculated and incubated with bacteria for three days at 28°C, while agitated at 220 rpm until full cell density was reached (OD595 nm ~ 2.5). Fifty microliters of this culture were transferred to tubes containing each five milliliters of YMB or PMM, and incubated with agitation at 28°C. Resulting exponentially growing cultures were incubated until an OD595 nm = 0.1-0.4 was reached, and concentrated by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in one milliliter of sterile YMB or PMM medium and pipetted 100 μL onto a scaffold, which here is a nitrocellulose filter, sand or seed. Nitrocellulose filters are historically used for drying rhizobia in studies addressing the responses of said organism to desiccation (Mary et al. 1985 and 1986, Boumahdi et al. 1999). In previous studies, we found a relation of cell number with desiccation survival. When using nitrocellulose filters, this is not seen. The three different matrices were placed into a microcentrifuge tube and stored at a relative humidity (RH) of 22% for three days at 20°C in the dark. 22% RH was chosen because survival of S. meliloti RCR2011, the parent of S. meliloti 1021, is highest between 67%-22% RH (Marie et al, 1985). Thus for studying physiological responses, drying at 22% RH represents severe desiccation conditions without detrimental effects of drying too fast or too severe. 22% RH in the air phase was obtained by drying in airtight glass jars over a saturated solution of potassium acetate (Vriezen et al, 2006).
To determine the number of surviving cells, the filters were removed from the jars and exposed to 100% RH for one hour inside an enclosed container at room temperature since exposure to water saturated air increases the colony forming units (Data not shown). One milliliter YMB medium was added to the sample while inside the microcentrifuge tube, and the CFU were determined by plate counting on YMB.
To study the possibility of irreversible binding to the filter, the recovery efficiency of cells from the filters was determined using plate counts and phase contrast microscopy. A volume of 50 μL of non-diluted crystal violet (Difco 4312525) was added to one milliliter of bacterial suspension to enhance the contrast. Also the live/dead staining kit (Baclight, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to estimate relative numbers of dead and living recovered cells making use of the selective permeability of cell membranes for propidium iodide (Anonymous 2004; Basaglia et al. 2007). This assay is based on the differential ability of two nucleic acid dyes to penetrate the cell. The green fluorescent dye penetrates all bacterial cells, while the larger red fluorescent dye binds the DNA of only those cells it can penetrate, i.e. those with compromised membranes. Resuspended cells were mixed 1:1 in 1 mL solution containing 3 μL Syto9 and 3 μL propidium iodide. 25 μL of this solution were transferred onto a microscopic slide coated with LE Agarose (Genepure, ISC Bioexpress, Kaysville, Utah). LE agarose was used to immobilize cells to aid with direct counting (Liu et al. 2001). After 15 minutes incubation in the dark, the numbers of live and dead cells were counted microscopically using epifluorescent illumination (Olympus BX51, Olympus USA, Center Valley, PA) with the appropriate filter blocks. At least three frames per sample were completely counted with a minimum of one hundred cells.
The percentage of surviving cells are displayed as the 10Log of this percentage, where 2 = 100% survival and 0 = 1% survival. Regression lines were calculated and line graphs made using Excel (Microsoft Office Excel 2003 SP2). The F-test was used to determine differences in variance, the T-test to determine levels of significance using Excel. SEM = Standard Error of the Mean. For further calculations, please see Additional file 1.
Survival during desiccation of three S. meliloti strains
Identification of a suitable matrix for desiccation studies
To discriminate between matrix and desiccation effect, three matrices were tested for their effect on survival of S. meliloti 1021 during desiccation.": (i) nitrocellulose filters, (ii) Ottawa Sand, and (iii) alfalfa seeds. Controlled storage conditions without drying were achieved using the same matrices, but the matrices were kept in air above water leading to 100% RH in the air-phase. The colony forming units (CFU) of surviving cells on a nitrocellulose filter in Ottawa Sand and on alfalfa seeds was negatively affected during storage at 22% RH (Figure 1B). When dried in Ottawa Sand and on nitrocellulose filters, the CFU declined to 7.7% and 3.1% of the original CFU respectively (Figure 1B), and did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). When S. meliloti cells were dried on alfalfa seeds, the reduction in colony forming units was much greater, and only 0.018% survived (a 5.7 × 103 fold reduction, Figure 1B). This reduction includes both a matrix as well as an adverse effect caused by desiccation. At 100% RH, the number of CFU was not affected negatively in sand nor on filters, however, when placed on sterile alfalfa seeds, CFU did decline to 0.27%. This can be explained by a toxic effect of the seed-surface, which has been described previously (Salema et al. 1982 Death of rhizobia on inoculated seed, Smith 1992, Vriezen et al. 2006, Penna et al. 2011). We chose to further explore the responses of S. meliloti 1021 to desiccation using nitrocellulose filters, since the error on filter is lower compared to the use of a sand matrix, and no negative matrix effect is seen similar to drying on alfalfa seeds. Most importantly, since the focus of this investigation was the physiological response to desiccation of S. meliloti, the ideal matrix does not affect survival but only desiccation does
Microscopic examination using differential staining
Desiccation over seven days affected the culturability of the cells (Figure 1C). After seven days at 22% RH the number of CFU dropped to 6.8% compared to the direct count. In comparison, after the same time but at 100% RH there was no significant loss in the numbers of CFU or total cells.
Since only a fraction of the cells form colonies after desiccation, we expected that those cells that lost the ability to form colonies have a compromised cell membrane. To determine the role of desiccation in the loss of cell membrane integrity, the BacLight Live/dead stain was employed on the cells recovered from nitrocellulose filters. Using this stain one can discriminate between cells that lost membrane integrity, stain red and are dead, while intact viable cells stain green (See Additional file 2). At 100% RH, the number of dead cells (4.4 ± 0.5%) had not changed significantly after three days compared to experimental onset (Figure 1D). However, after drying over three days, the number of dead cells (red) increased to 56.9 ± 10.6%, while the remaining 43.1% of the cells stained green. During that time there was no significant difference between direct microscopic counts supported by the contrast enhancing dye crystal violet and direct counts with the BacLight stain.
Long term storage
To estimate the rate of loss of culturability over time, changes in the CFU as well as in the dead fraction of cells during a time course of 63 days was determined (Figure 2B). The CFU declined as a function of time following the formula: Y(%CFU) = 6.9 × 10-0.044X (R2= 0.74). The fraction of dead cells followed the regression line: -0.0605X+50.985 (R2 = 0.37). Thus, when integrating different time points the CFU declined steadily, while the fraction of viable cells remained similar over time. A regression line describing the deduced increase of the VBNC fraction, relative to the green fraction of cells, was determined as 86.6 × X0.039 (R2 = 0.95, Figure 2C). Relative to the total number of cells the VBNC increased by 93.3 × X0.018 (R2 = 0.95, Figure 2C).
Estimation of storage time
Estimated storage time in days during desiccation on two matrices to achieve target CFU of 1000 or 1
Initial reduction (IR†)
41.6 ± 7.5
33.0 ± 12.8
(6.2 ± 2.2) × 103
Target CFU (Nf‡)
Initial CFU (N0§)
1 × 107
128 ± 2
60 ± 2
134 ± 5
66 ± 5
78 ± 1
10 ± 1
2 × 109
181 ± 2
113 ± 2
187 ± 5
118 ± 5
131 ± 1
62 ± 1
The symbiotic system of rhizobia with legumes can be used to replenish soils with biologically-fixed nitrogen and prevents the need for chemical fertilizers and pollution. To make optimal use of this system, inoculants are employed allowing close contact between the microorganisms and the germinating seed (Kosanke et al. 1999; Smith 1992; Deaker et al. 2004). Powder-based seed inocula require a drying step to enable long-term storage. This drying step can result in a reduction in inoculum quality (Smith 1992), i.e. reduced culturability and infectivity. Although culturability is reduced, a substantial part of the cells are in a viable but non-culturable state (VBNC). The induction of this physiological state by desiccation is a novel and very relevant observation since rhizobial VBNC cells do not infect plants, while those able to form colonies do as reported for strain S. meliloti 41 (Basaglia et al. 2007).
This physiological state, in which bacterial cells are alive, but not able to form colonies, exists in many microorganisms, including rhizobia (Manahan and Steck 1997; Alexander et al. 1999; Basaglia et al. 2007). Such a state was first described by Xu et al. (1982), and has been extensively reviewed (Oliver 2005; Maraha 2007; Hayes and Low 2009; Barcina and Arana 2009). In this study we used the Baclight live/dead stain to discriminate between living cells and dead cells. While it seems accurate to assume that membrane compromised bacterial cells can be considered dead (Nebe-von-Caron et al. 2000; Anonymous 2004; Berney et al. 2006, 2007), the reverse, that intact cells are active cells is not necessarily true (Joux and Lebaron 2000; Berney et al. 2007). Although a small fraction of cells with compromised membranes will be able to repair their membranes and grow, and some cells scored as intact will not be able to grow (Berney et al. 2007; Giao et al. 2009), this differential cell stain remains the method of choice for VBNC studies. The term VBNC applies directly to the observations presented in this manuscript. Cells of Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021, that were rewetted following desiccation, can be divided into three groups: (i) viable cells that form colonies, (ii) viable cells that do not form colonies, the VBNC fraction, and (iii) dead cells which lost membrane integrity.
Group I and II: Many environmental factors have been identified inducing a VBNC state in bacteria, which are natural stress, temperature stress, osmotic upshift, oxygen stress, white light, pasteurization, and chlorination (Oliver 2005). Also desiccation can induce a VBNC state in E. cloacae (Pederson and Jacobsen 1993) and S. meliloti (this manuscript). The VBNC fraction contains two groups of cells, the temporarily non-culturable and the permanently non-culturable (Maraha 2007). The challenge is to find the conditions that lead to resuscitation of the temporarily non-culturable fraction. Barry et al. (1956) noted that autoclaving media leads to an increase in H2O2 preventing growth. Therefore the addition of sodium pyruvate and catalase to the medium increased resuscitation in many organisms (Mizunoe et al. 1999; Imazaki and Nakaho 2009). We also attempted to resuscitate cells by plating and counting on different media (TY and YMB), with the addition of catalase or sodium pyruvate, and investigated different plating methods, regular and plate drop methods (data not shown). We were not able to increase the number of CFU amongst the cells that we considered to be in the VBNC state. Basaglia et al. (2007) shows that lack of O2 leads to a VBNC state in S. meliloti strain 41, another model organism, however, O2 supplementation alone does not result in resuscitation, nor did the addition of catalase, which is in agreement with our results. We also tested the effect of oxic versus anoxic conditions on survival but found that it did not increase CFU over 63 days of storage at 22% RH (data not shown). Based on these findings it appears that all VBNC cells are in a permanent state of non-culturability. Manahan and Steck (1997) showed that tap water induced the VBNC state in S. meliloti 1021, however, the inducing component may have been copper in the tap water as was later shown by Alexander et al. (1999) for A. tumefaciens and R. leguminosarum.
Group III: Desiccation leads to an increase in the fraction of cells that lost membrane integrity. This desiccation induced loss of membrane integrity can be caused by changes in phase transition of phospholipids (Potts 1994; Leslie et al. 1995), by hypo-osmotic stresses during rewetting and the consequent breakage of the cell wall (Bushby and Marshall 1977 Desiccation induced damage to the cell envelope of root nodule bacteria, 1977 Some factors affecting the survival of root nodule bacteria on desiccation; Salema et al. 1982 Rupture of nodule bacteria on drying and rehydration), and by lipid per-oxidation when cells are not able to repair damages during low water availability (Borst et al. 2000; Billi and Potts 2002). Currently, it is not known which of the above listed processes are the underlying mechanisms for our observations.
Another possible explanation for the occurrence of VBNC cells after desiccation is that these cells are without functional template for replication of DNA. DNA is a major target of desiccation in microorganisms, including E.coli (Asada et al. 1979) and D. radiodurans (Mattimore and Battista 1996), as degradation of DNA is common as a response to desiccation. In rhizobia, desiccation sensitive mutants were isolated with mutations in the DNA repair systems (Humann et al. 2009), confirming that rhizobia are similarly affected by desiccation. It would be interesting to see if the CFU of rhizobia increases after desiccation with in-trans expression of DNA repair enzymes.
In this study we estimated the effect of storage time during nine weeks of desiccation of S. meliloti 1021. The reduction of CFU is 0.044 10Log per day, a 10-fold decrease per 22 days. Using our data, it is possible to estimate the storage time to reach sterility or the required lower limit for successful seed inoculation of 1000 CFU/seed. E.g. when dried on nitrocellulose, a sample containing 107 CFU would lead to sterility in 128 days (Table 1). However, when 2 × 109 bacteria per filter are assumed (for easy comparison the same amount of S. meliloti RCR2011 cells was taken which Boumahdi et al. (1999) had placed on a filter), sterility or the minimum of 1000 CFU (Smith 1992) would be reached after 113 days, and the complete loss of CFU after 181 days. When dried on the seed, the time it takes S. meliloti 1021 to reach the standard of 1000 CFU is 10 days, and 62 days with an initial cell number of 107 and 2 × 109, respectively. Since this is substantially shorter than the estimates by Boumahdi et al. (1999), the estimated storage time can not be estimated by only using survival rates after the initial decline in CFU, but should take into account the fast decrease in CFU during the early phases of drying. Additionally, when dried in the lag- and stationary phase on a filter under 22% RH of the air phase Boumahdi et al. (1999) found S. meliloti 2011 to survive for 457 and 138 days, respectively. We determined a storage time of 113 days. This study extended the excellent findings by Boumahdi et al. (1999). The discrepancies between the results can be explained by the differences in the methods. In contrast to our method, Boumahdi et al. (1999) used filter suction and a much higher concentration of cells. Unfortunately, this group did not provide a bi-phasic survival curve, or used lag-phase cells in their storage time estimations. Furthermore, it is unclear if the cells they had used were growing cells or diluted late stationary phase cells. This is important, since the physiological differences between the two types are expected to have different responses to desiccation (Vriezen et al. 2006).
The observation and study of the appearance of VBNC cells is extremely important for the interpretation and risk assessment of data regarding the fate of rhizobial cells in soil and seed inocula. Our study shows that (i) desiccation induces a VBNC state in S. meliloti, which has not been reported before; (ii) finding methods to avoid a VBNC state may improve the quality of dry base seed inocula, considering the finding by Basaglia et al. (2007) that only resuscitated VBNC cells can successfully infect plant roots; (iii) the commercial Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 102F85 survives short term desiccation better than strains 102F84 and 1021, and (iv) underestimation of survival may have consequences for the spread of introduced rhizobia.
This work was partially funded by Novozyme grant 74576 to F.J.dB. and USDA Hatch grant 1024 to K.N. Furthermore, we thank J. Wopereis at Smith College, Northampton/MA, for use of the epifluorescent microscope, and Dr. R.S. Smith at Novozyme for critically reading the manuscript.
- Alexander E, Pham D, Steck TR: The viable but non-culturable condition is induced by copper in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium leguminosarum . Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65: 3754–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anonymous: Live/dead baclight bacterial viability kits manufacturers manual. Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; 2004.Google Scholar
- Asada S, Takano M, Shibasaki I: Deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks during drying of Escherichia coli on a hydrophobic filter membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979, 37: 266–73.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atlas RM, Parks LC: Handbook of Microbiological Media. CRC Press, Ann Arbor; 1993.Google Scholar
- Barcina I, Arana I: The viable but non-culturable phenotype: a crossroads in the life-cycle of non-differentiating bacteria? Rev in Environ Sci and Biotech 2009, 8: 245–55. 10.1007/s11157-009-9159-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barry VC, Conalty ML, Dennedy JM, Winder F: Peroxide formation in bacteriological media. Nature 1956, 178: 596–7. 10.1038/178596a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basaglia M, Povolo S, Casella S: Resuscitation of viable but non-culturable Sinorhizobium meliloti 41 prp4-luc: effects of oxygen and host plant. Curr Microbiol 2007, 54: 167–74. 10.1007/s00284-005-0482-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beringer JE: R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum . J Gen Microbiol 1974, 84: 188–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann HU, Egli T: Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the live/dead baclight kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73: 3283–90. 10.1128/AEM.02750-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berney M, Weilenmann HU, Egli T: Flow-cytometric study of vital cellular functions in Escherichia coli during solar disinfection (sodis). Microbiol 2006, 152: 1719–29. 10.1099/mic.0.28617-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Billi D, Potts M: Life and death of dried prokaryotes. Res Microbiol 2002, 153: 7–12. 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01279-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borst JW, Visser NV, Kouptsova O, Visser AJ: Oxidation of unsaturated phospholipids in membrane bilayer mixtures is accompanied by membrane fluidity changes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1487: 61–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boumahdi M, Mary P, Hornez JP: Influence of growth phases and desiccation on the degrees of unsaturation of fatty acids and the survival rates of rhizobia. J Appl Microbiol 1999, 87: 611–9. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00860.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bushby H, Marshall K: Desiccation induced damage to the cell envelope of root nodule bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 1977, 9: 149–52. 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90066-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bushby H, Marshall K: Some factors affecting the survival of root nodule bacteria on desiccation. Soil Biol Biochem 1977, 9: 143–47. 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90065-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Catroux G, Hartmann A, Revellin C: Trends in rhizobial inoculant production and use. Plant and Soil 2001, 230: 21–30. 10.1023/A:1004777115628View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chenu C: Clay- or sand-polysaccharide associations as models for the interface between micro-organisms and soil: water related properties and microstructure. Geoderma 1993, 56: 143–56. 10.1016/0016-7061(93)90106-UView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deaker R, Roughley RJ, Kennedy IR: Legume seed inoculation technology-a review. Soil Biol Biochem 2004, 36: 1275–88. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dye M: A note on some factors affecting the survival of Rhizobium cultures during freeze drying and subsequent storage. J Appl Microbiol 1982, 52: 461–64. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1982.tb05078.xGoogle Scholar
- Estrella M, Pieckenstain F, Marina M, Dìaz L, Ruiz O: Cheese whey: an alternative growth and protective medium for Rhizobium loti cells. J Ind Microbiol Biotech 2004,31(3):122–26. 10.1007/s10295-004-0124-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gião MS, Wilks SA, Azevedo NF, Vieira MJ, Keevil CW: Validation of syto9/propidium iodide uptake for rapid detection of viable but non-cultivable Legionella pneumophila . Microb Ecol 2009, 58: 56–62. 10.1007/s00248-008-9472-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes CS, Low DA: Signals of growth regulation in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2009, 12: 667–73. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.09.006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Humann JL, Ziemkiewicz HT, Yurgel SN, Kahn ML: Regulatory and DNA repair genes contribute to the desiccation resistance of Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 446–53. 10.1128/AEM.02207-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imazaki I, Nakaho K: Temperature-upshift-mediated revival from the sodium-pyruvate recoverable viable but non-culturable state induced by low temperature in Ralstonia solanacearum : linear regression analysis. J Gen Plant Path 2009, 75: 213–26. 10.1007/s10327-009-0166-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones KM, Kobayashi H, Davies BW, Taga ME, Walker GC: How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-medicago model. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007, 5: 619–33. 10.1038/nrmicro1705PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joux F, Lebaron P: Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level. Microbes Infect 2000, 2: 1523–35. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01307-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaci Y, Heyraud A, Barakat M, Heulin T: Isolation and identification of an EPS-producing Rhizobium strain from arid soil (Algeria): characterization of its EPS and the effect of inoculation on wheat rhizosphere soil structure. Res Microbiol 2005, 156: 522–31. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosanke J, Osburn R, Smith R, Liphatech Inc: Process for preparation of bacterial agricultural products. Canada Brevet-Patent 1999. 2,073,507, 6 April 1999Google Scholar
- Kosanke JW, Osburn RM, Shuppe GI, Smith RS: Slow rehydration improves the recovery of dried bacterial populations. Can J Microbiol 1992, 38: 520–5. 10.1139/m92-086View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kremer RJ, Peterson HL: Effects of carrier and temperature on survival of Rhizobium spp. in legume inocula: Development of an improved type of inoculant. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983, 45: 1790–4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leslie SB, Israeli E, Lighthart B, Crowe JH, Crowe LM: Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and proteins in intact bacteria during drying. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995, 61: 3592–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Dazzo FB, Glagoleva O, Yu B, Jain AK: CMEIAS: A Computer-Aided System for the Image Analysis of Bacterial Morphotypes in Microbial Communities. Microbiol Ecol 2001, 41: 173–194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manahan SH, Steck TR: The viable but non-culturable state in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium meliloti . Microbiol Ecol 1997, 22: 29–37. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00353.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maraha N: Physiological status of bacteria used for environmental applications. Dissertation, Karolinska Institutet; 2007.Google Scholar
- Mary P, Ochin D, Tailliez R: Rates of drying and survival of Rhizobium meliloti strains during storage at different relative humidities. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985, 50: 207–11.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mary P, Ochin D, Tailliez R: Growth status of rhizobia in relation to their tolerance to low water activities and desiccation stresses. Soil Biol Biochem 1986, 18: 179–84. 10.1016/0038-0717(86)90024-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattimore V, Battista JR: Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans : functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J Bac 1996, 178: 633–7.Google Scholar
- Meade HM, Long SR, Ruvkun GB, Brown SE, Ausubel FM: Physical and genetic characterization of symbiotic and auxotrophic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti induced by transposon Tn 5 mutagenesis. J Bac 1982, 149: 114–22.Google Scholar
- Mizunoe Y, Wai SN, Takade A, Yoshida S: Restoration of culturability of starvation-stressed and low-temperature-stressed Escherichia coli O157 cells by using H 2 O 2 -degrading compounds. Arch Microbiol 1999, 172: 63–7. 10.1007/s002030050741View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nebe-von-Caron G, Stephens PJ, Hewitt CJ, Powell JR, Badley RA: Analysis of bacterial function by multi-colour fluorescence flow cytometry and single cell sorting. J Microbiol Meth 2000, 42: 97–114. 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00181-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliver J: The viable but non-culturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol (Seoul, Korea) 2005, 43: 93–100.Google Scholar
- Pederson JC, Jacobsen CS: Fate of Enterobacter cloacae JP210 and AEO106(pRo101) in soil during waterstress: Effect on culturability and viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993,59(5):1560–1564.Google Scholar
- Penna C, Massa R, Olivieri F, Gutkind G, Cassán F: A simple method to evaluate the number of bradyrhizobia on soybeen seeds and its implication on inoculant quality control. AMB Exp 2011, 1: 21. 10.1186/2191-0855-1-21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Potts M: Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev 1994, 58: 755–805.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rice WA: Performance of Rhizobium meliloti strains selected for low-pH tolerance. Can J Plant Sci 1982, 62: 941–948. 10.4141/cjps82-139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sadowski MJ, Graham PH: Soil biology of the Rhizobiaceae . In The Rhizobiaceae. Edited by: Spaink HP, Kondorosi A, Hooykaas PJJ. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London; 1998.Google Scholar
- Salema M, Parker C, Kidby D, Chatel D: Death of rhizobia on inoculated seed. Soil Biol Biochem 1982, 14: 13–4. 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90070-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salema M, Parker C, Kidby D, Chatel D, Armitage T: Rupture of nodule bacteria on drying and rehydration. Soil Biol Biochem 1982, 14: 15–22. 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90071-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith RS: Legume inoculant formulation and application. Can J Microbiol 1992, 38: 485–92. 10.1139/m92-080View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trotman AP, Weaver RW: Tolerance of clover rhizobia to heat and desiccation stresses in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1995, 59: 466–70. 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900020028xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Rensburg H, Strijdom B: Survival of fast- and slow-growing Rhizobium spp. under conditions of relatively mild desiccation. Soil Biol Biochem 1980, 12: 353–56. 10.1016/0038-0717(80)90009-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vincent JT, Thompson J, Donovan K: Death of root-nodule bacteria on drying. Aus J Agri Res 1962, 13: 258–70. 10.1071/AR9620258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vriezen JAC, deBruijn FJ, Nüsslein K: Desiccation responses and survival of Sinorhizobium meliloti USDA 1021 in relation to growth phase, temperature, chloride and sulfate availability. Lett Appl Microbiol 2006, 42: 172–8. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01808.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vriezen JAC, deBruijn FJ, Nüsslein K: Responses of rhizobia to desiccation in relation to osmotic stress, oxygen, and temperature. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73: 3451–9. 10.1128/AEM.02991-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu HS, Roberts N, Singleton FL, Attwell RW, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR: Survival and viability of non-culturable Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb Ecol 1982, 8: 313–23. 10.1007/BF02010671View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zahran HH: Rhizobium -legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999, 63: 968–89.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.