Skip to content

Advertisement

AMB Express

AMB Express Cover Image
Original
Open Access

Process development for the elucidation of mycotoxin formation in Alternaria alternata

  • Katrin Brzonkalik1Email author,
  • Tanja Herrling1,
  • Christoph Syldatk1 and
  • Anke Neumann1
AMB Express20111:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-27

©  Brzonkalik et al; licensee Springer. 2011

Received: 19 September 2011

Accepted: 4 October 2011

Published: 4 October 2011

Abstract

The black mould Alternaria alternata produces a wide diversity of mycotoxins which are of particular health concern. Since no maximum allowable limits are set for Alternaria toxins in food and feed, prevention of Alternaria infestations and mycotoxin spoilage is the only way to avoid health risks. Thus, the understanding of mycotoxin biosynthesis is essential. For that purpose, a reliable batch process in a 2 L bioreactor was established which enables the study of several parameters influencing the production of the mycotoxins alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethylether (AME) and tenuazonic acid (TA) by A. alternata DSM 12633. Modified Czapek-Dox medium was used with glucose as carbon source and ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources. Consumption of carbon and nitrogen sources as well as formation of the three mycotoxins were monitored; the average data of five independent fermentations was plotted and fitted using a logistic equation with four parameters. Maximum mycotoxin concentrations of 3.49 ± 0.12 mg/L AOH, 1.62 ± 0.14 mg/L AME and 38.28 ± 0.1 mg/L TA were obtained.

In this system the effect of different aeration rates (0.53 vvm-0.013 vvm) was tested which exerted a great influence on mycotoxin production. The use of the semi-synthetic Czapek-Dox medium allowed the exchange of carbon and nitrogen sources for acetate and aspartic acid. The use of acetate instead of glucose resulted in the sole production of alternariol whereas the exchange of ammonium and nitrate for aspartate enhanced the production of both AOH and AME while TA production was not affected.

Keywords

Alternaria alternata MycotoxinBatch processAeration rate

Introduction

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of low molecular weight produced by filamentous fungi. Since the discovery of the first mycotoxins, the aflatoxins, in 1960 which caused the death of 10,000 turkeys many new mycotoxins have been identified in the last 50 years. Today 300 to 400 compounds are designated as mycotoxins (Bennett and Klich 2003). As other secondary metabolites mycotoxins are formed subsequently to the growth phase and are not necessary for growth or development (Fox and Howlett 2008). Mycotoxin formation is subjected to a complex regulation, but it is often induced by nutrient limitation (Demain 1986). Mycotoxins are released by the fungus in the surrounding substrate and contamination of agricultural products is therefore possible. They are connected to certain health disorders and elicit acute toxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, carcinogenic and sometimes estrogenic properties (Bhatnagar et al. 2002). Based on estimations of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations approximately 25% of the world's food crops are affected by mycotoxin producing fungi and global losses of foodstuffs due to mycotoxins are in the range of 1000 million tons per year http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/agns/chemicals_mycotoxins_en.asp.

Alternaria species are wide spread black moulds which belong to the division of Deuteromycota (Bottalico and Logrieco 1998) and are common saprophytes found on decaying organic material world-wide. The genus Alternaria includes also opportunistic plant-pathogens affecting many cultivated plants in the fields and stored fruits and vegetables during post-harvest (Guo et al. 2004). Alternaria species are capable to produce a wide diversity of secondary metabolites belonging to different chemical groups including dibenzopyrones, tetramic acids, lactones, quinones and cyclic peptides. More than 120 secondary metabolites of Alternaria species are known; a quarter of that is designated as mycotoxins (Panigrahi 1997). Five major Alternaria toxins can be found as natural contaminants in foodstuffs: the benzopyrene derivatives alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethylether (AME), altenuene (ALT), the tetramic acid tenuazonic acid (TA) and the perylene derivative altertoxin I (ATX I) (Barkai-Golan 2008). These toxins were detected in apples (Stinson et al. 1981), tomatoes (Stinson et al. 1981), wheat (Azcarate et al. 2008 Li and Yoshizawa 2000 Patriarca et al. 2007), olives (Visconti et al. 1986), sunflower seeds (Pozzi 2005), fruit juices (Lau et al. 2003) and tomato products (Motta and Valente Soares 2001 Terminiello et al. 2006). Therefore, Alternaria toxins can be considered as toxic contaminant of our everyday food (Barkai-Golan 2008).

Although the acute toxicity of Alternaria toxins is low (LD50 of Alternaria extracts: 300 mg/kg body weight in mice, LD50 of AOH: > 400 mg/kg body weight of mice (Pero et al. 1973)), they are connected to certain health disorders. Alternaria extracts have been described as mutagenic and tumorigenic (Liu et al. 1991 Schrader et al. 2001). Of particular health concern is the incidence of esophageal cancer in Linxin, China. The etiology of this cancer was connected with the contamination of cereal grains with A. alternata (Dong et al. 1987 Liu et al. 1992). As stated by (Pero et al. 1973), the toxicity of complex extracts is much higher than of the single tested mycotoxins which suggest synergism between single components. Although numerous toxicological studies were conducted to clarify the effects of Alternaria toxins a risk assessment is not possible. According to the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, BfR 2003) only little toxicological data are available just for seven out of the 30 known Alternaria mycotoxins which is insufficient for an assessment of the health risk for the consumer.

As long as maximum allowable limits in food for Alternaria toxins were not defined prevention of Alternaria infestations and mycotoxin spoilage is the best way to avoid health risks. Therefore, knowledge about factors which enhance or inhibit mycotoxin production and its regulation is crucial. Mycotoxin production varies with fungal strain, the substrate and environmental growth conditions. This includes factors like water activity, temperature, pH-value and light. According to (Schmidt-Heydt et al. 2008) mycotoxin production can be regarded as an adaptation to imposed abiotic or other stresses of the mycotoxigenic species. Whereas the influence of water activity, temperature and light was extensively studied for different A. alternata strains and media (Hasan 1995 Magan et al. 1984 Pose et al. 2010 Schmidt-Heydt et al. 2011 Söderhäll et al. 1978), the effects of pH and nutritional factors were neglected. Additionally, all these studies use different kinds of media and culture conditions, e.g. solid agar-media, liquid surface culture or drop cultures, which render direct comparisons difficult. The intention of this work is therefore the establishment of a reproducible system which enables the elucidation of all important influences on mycotoxin production in A. alternata. For optimal reproducibility and comparability of single experiments a process in a bioreactor was developed allowing direct monitoring and prevention of nutrient or oxygen limitations. With respect to the production of mycotoxins with Alternaria spp. submerged fermentation protocols were not developed yet. To the knowledge of the authors only one protocol for submerged fermentation of Alternaria spp. for the production of the new antibiotic altersetin (Hellwig et al. 2002) and another solid state fermentation protocol for the production of mycoherbicidal agents with A. alternata (Singh et al. 2010) were published. The primary purpose of the presented process is to enhance the knowledge of regulatory mechanisms for Alternaria toxin production but additionally it may be helpful for the development of further production processes of other interesting secondary metabolites of Alternaria spp.

Materials and methods

Strain, media and processing

A. alternata DSM 12633 was obtained from DSMZ culture collection ("Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen", Braunschweig, Germany). All cultures of A. alternata were routinely grown on PDA (Roth, Germany). Conidia were harvested with 25% glycerol solution from plates that were incubated for seven days at 28°C and filtered through Miracloth (Calbiochem). Conidia were counted in a Thoma counting chamber and diluted with glycerol to a concentration of 1*106 condia per ml. Aliquots of glycerol stocks were stored at -80°C.

For the fermentation experiments 1.5 L of modified Czapek-Dox medium (modified after Gatenbeck and Hermodsson 1965) at pH 5.5 were used: 10 g/L glucose, 0.06 g/L NH4Cl, 0.25 g/L NaNO3, 1 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4 * 7 H2O, 0.25 g/L NaCl, 0.25 g/L KCl, 0.01 g/L FeSO4 * 7 H2O, 0.01 g/L ZnSO4 * 7 H2O, 1 g/L yeast extract. For the experiments with alternative carbon and nitrogen sources glucose and/or the mixture of ammonium chloride and sodium nitrate were replaced. In a first experiment glucose was exchanged for 22.66 g/L sodium acetate trihydrate and in a second experiment the mixture of ammonium chloride and sodium nitrate was exchanged for 0.54 g/L aspartic acid. In a third experiment both glucose and ammonium chloride/sodium nitrate were exchange for acetate and aspartic acid. In all experiments the same amounts of carbon (4 g/L) and nitrogen (56.8 mg/L) were used. The carbon sources were prepared separately and were added after autoclaving. The process was operated in the small-scale bioreactor (vessel volume 2.0 L) Minifors (Infors, Bottmingen, Switzerland) for the indicated time period at 28°C in the dark. The medium was inoculated directly with a thawed aliquot of 1*106 conidia, a pre-culture was not used. The bioreactor was equipped with two 6-blade Rushton Turbines; stirring speed was enhanced from 400 rpm to 900 rpm after 48 h. The aeration rate was 0.013 vvm if not indicated otherwise. For pH adjustment 2 M sodium hydroxide and 2 M phosphoric acid were used.

Analytical methods

Data analysis

Nutrient consumption and mycotoxin production were fitted using a logistic equation with four parameters in a scientific data analysis and graphing software (Sigma Plot 9.0, Systat, San Jose, USA). The used equation was:
y x = y 0 + a 1 + x x 0 b
(1)

The four parameters are the following: y0 indicates the minimum concentration of the respective nutrient or mycotoxin; a indicates the maximum nutrient/mycotoxin concentration; x0 indicates the process time when half of the nutrient amount is consumed or half of the maximum mycotoxin concentration is produced; b is a shape parameter and difficult to explain biologically (Erkmen and Alben 2002). Ammonium and AME concentration lapse were derived analogously with a logistic equation with three parameters (cf. Eq. 1, but excluding y0). Derivation of the fitting was used for the determination of absolute consumption and production rates.

Detection of mycotoxins

Alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethylether (AME) and tenuazonic acid (TA) were analyzed simultaneously by HPLC. The standard HPLC device (Agilent 1100 Series, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) was equipped with a 25 cm reversed phase column (Luna 5 μm C18(2), Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany). Analyzes were performed at 30°C and a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. Mobile phase solution was methanol/0.1 M NaH2PO4 (2:1), pH 3.2 (according to Shephard et al. 1991). Mycotoxins were monitored with a UV detector at 280 nm. For quantification a standard curve with mycotoxin standard solutions was prepared. The standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany) and solved in methanol.

Mycotoxins were extracted twice with equal amounts of ethyl acetate from 5 ml culture broth after acidifying with 5 μl conc. HCl. The supernatants were combined and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge. The residue was dissolved in methanol and used for HPLC analyzes. More than 90% of the mycotoxins could be extracted by this method. Retention times were 5.3 ± 0.1 min (TA), 10.2 ± 0.2 min (AOH) and 23.3 ± 0.1 min (AME). Detection limits for this method were 16 ng of injected AOH, 33 ng of injected AME and 12 ng of injected TA.

Quantification of nutritional components and biomass

The glucose concentration during the fermentation process was monitored with the photometrical anthrone assay (Pons et al. 1981).

Ammonium and nitrate were determined with the photometrical assays "Ammonium-Test" (Spectroquant®, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and "Nitrat-Test" (Spectroquant®, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

For biomass quantification fungal mycelium was transferred from the bioreactor at the end of fermentation to a weighed tube and dried completely at 60°C. The weight was determined on a standard balance.

Results

Process parameters of A. alternata fermentation in a 2 L bioreactor system

To elucidate the reproducibility of the system five independent fermentations were performed. The following results represent the average data of all five fermentations (Figure 1). Consumption of the nutrients glucose, ammonium and nitrate showed characteristic logistic decrease and were fitted according to Eq. 1. The root squares for the consumption curve fittings were ≥ 0.98. Formation of the mycotoxins could be described logistically and were also fitted according to Eq. 1. The root square for the formation curve fittings of TA and AOH were ≥ 0.99 and of AME ≥ 0.97. The maintained parameters for the fittings are displayed in Table 1.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Production of the mycotoxins tenuazonic acid (TA) ( a ), alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethylether (AME) ( b ) and consumption of the nutrients glucose, nitrate and ammonium ( a , b ) with A. alternata DSM 12633 in a 2 L bioreactor. Measured glucose, nitrate, ammonium, TA, AOH and AME concentrations are given as averages of five independent fermentations. All lines represent logistic fittings of the concentrations based on Eq. 1.

Table 1

Parameters of logistic fittings based on Eq.1 of nutrient consumption and mycotoxin formation in a bioreactor cultivation with A. alternata

 

y0

a

x0

b

R2

Max. consumption/production rate [mg/(L*h)]

Glucose

-0.3964

10.7147

141.2869

4.2033

0.9891

84.38

Nitrate

-1.174

207.9278

126.501

18.6103

0.9997

0.742

Ammonium

0

39.0676

89.0597

4.9735

0.9828

7.67

TA

-0.0448

38.7128

112.0248

-4.5425

0.9936

0.412

AOH

-0.1304

3.6254

278.5357

-14.4819

0.9933

0.078

AME

0

2.0951

225.0668

-6.8872

0.9775

0.017

TA: tenuazonic acid; AOH: alternariol; AME: alternariol monomethylether.

Parameters were maintained from five experiments.

Both nitrogen sources and glucose were consumed completely during the process. The consumption of glucose and ammonium did not start immediately most probably due to a germination phase of approximately 24 h and the presence of yeast extract in the medium. After 50 h of cultivation first TA concentrations of 0.92 mg/L were quantified. TA production continued until the end of fermentation (260 h) but was slowed down with decreasing glucose concentrations. A maximum TA concentration of 38.28 ± 1.61 mg/L was achieved. The nitrogen sources were depleted subsequently; after total exhaustion of ammonia consumption of nitrate started. With exhaustion of nitrate first AOH concentrations could be detected and reached a maximum concentration of approximately 3.49 ± 0.12 mg/L at the end of fermentation. AME production started delayed after AOH production and reached a maximum concentration of 1.62 ± 0.14 mg/L.

Absolute consumption and production rates were obtained by derivation of the respective fitting with the maxima indicated in Table 1. All rates were normalized and the relative rates of glucose and the mycotoxins TA, AOH and AME are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Calculated averaged relative glucose consumption rate and mycotoxin production rates of five independent fermentations of A. alternata DSM 12633 in a 2 L bioreactor. TA: tenuazonic acid; AOH: alternariol; AME: alternariol monomethylether.

The maxima of the TA, AOH and AME production rates were calculated for 100 h, 175 h and 215 h of cultivation, respectively, whereas the maximum of the glucose consumption rate was determined for 125 h of cultivation. The maximum of glucose consumption rate indicates high metabolic activity and probably high biomass increase. Therefore, TA production appeared to be growth related while AOH and AME production seemed to be not growth-related, being this fact indicative of a typical secondary metabolite behavior.

Influence of aeration rate on mycotoxin production

For the process development different aeration rates were tested. Figure 3 shows the effect of different aeration rates on mycotoxin production. In these experiments measurement of pO2 was not possible due to invasive fungal growth on the electrode. At higher aeration rates (2 vvm-0.53 vvm) A. alternata was not growing in pellet form, but was clinging on the flow-breaker and other fixtures very tightly. Only TA (23.52 ± 6.43 mg/L) and low concentrations of AOH (0.67 ± 0.31 mg/L) could be detected in the culture broth, AME was not detectable. A reduction of the aeration rate to 0.067 vvm resulted in an increase of all mycotoxins to 1.81 ± 1.40 mg/L AOH, 0.74 ± 1.05 mg/L AME and 37.87 ± 0.88 mg/L. A further enhancement of mycotoxin production was achieved by lowering the aeration rate to 0.013 vvm: 3.1 ± 0.06 mg/L AOH, 1.78 ± 0.23 AME and 38.35 ± 1.22 mg/L TA could be detected. Due to the decreased aeration the morphology of A. alternata changed: At 0.067 vvm less mycelium was clinging at the vessel wall, total biomass was reduced and pellets occurred in the culture broth. When the aeration rate was lowered to 0.013 vvm the biomass was further reduced and more mycelium was present freely in the broth in form of pellets or filaments. Inherent to the design further decrease of the aeration rate was not possible. Therefore, a gas mixture was used consisting of 5% oxygen and 95% nitrogen to decrease the oxygen supply while keeping the aeration rate at 0.013 vvm. The aeration with the gas mixture caused a drastic decrease of the polyketide mycotoxins (0.24 ± 0.35 mg/L AOH, AME was not detected) but did not affect TA production (34.60 ± 1.58 mg/L) significantly. In a final experiment the aeration was stopped completely after 48 h at 0.013 vvm (designated as "anaerobic" in Figure 3). The production of the polyketide mycotoxins seemed to be inhibited; AOH and AME were not detected, TA production was reduced to a maximum concentration of 8.04 ± 0.52 mg/L.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Mycotoxin production with A. alternata in a 2 L bioreactor system using different aeration rates. Results are mean of two replicates. TA: tenuazonic acid; AOH: alternariol; AME: alternariol monomethylether.

Fermentation with alternative carbon and nitrogen sources

As shown previously for ochratoxin (Abbas et al. 2009 Medina et al. 2008), aflatoxin (Buchanan and Stahl 1984), trichothecene (Jiao et al. 2008) and Alternaria toxins (Brzonkalik et al. 2011), mycotoxin production depends on nitrogen and carbon sources. In a previous study of (Brzonkalik et al. 2011) the carbon source acetate and the nitrogen source aspartic acid were promising candidates for an enhancement of Alternaria toxin production in static cultivation and shaking flask experiments. Consequently, fermentation experiments were performed with the described process with different combinations of carbon and nitrogen sources and are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2

Mycotoxin production in a 2 L bioreactor by A.alternata depending on carbon and nitrogen source at an aeration rate of 0.013 vvm

Carbon source

Nitrogen source

AOH [mg/L]

AME [mg/L]

TA

[mg/L]

Process time [h]

BDM [g/L]

aGlucose

NH4Cl, NaNO3

3.49 ± 0.121

1.62 ± 0.142

38.28 ± 1.61

260

3.3 ± 0.1

aGlucose

Aspartic acid

7.75 ± 0.064

4.81 ± 0.014

36.54 ± 0.81

350

3.49 ± 0.27

bNa-acetate

NH4Cl, NaNO3

6.64 ± 0.010

ND

ND

400

1.98 ± 0.06

Na-acetate

Aspartic acid

3.66

ND

ND

400

2.62

a Results are mean of 5 replicates ± standard deviation

b Results are mean of 2 replicates ± standard deviation.

Acetate fermentations were conducted without pH control, glucose fermentations were performed at pH 5.5. Values display maximal detected mycotoxin concentration. Process time gives the earliest time point when the maximum concentration was achieved.

AOH: alternariol; AME: alternariol monomethylether; TA: tenuazonic acid; BDM: biodrymass; ND: below detection limit of < 0.001 mg/L.

The exchange of ammonium and nitrate for aspartic acid resulted in a 2.2 fold increase of the AOH maximum concentration to 7.75 mg/L and enhanced AME production to 4.81 mg/L. The maximum TA concentration was not affected compared to the fermentation with ammonium and nitrate. While the biomass concentration was not altered significantly, process time had to be prolonged to 350 h to reach the above mentioned mycotoxin concentrations.

The exchange of glucose for acetate in combination with ammonium and nitrate seemed to inhibit the formation of TA and AME. Only AOH was detected and its maximum concentration was enhanced 1.9 fold to 6.64 mg/L. Biomass production was decreased to 1.98 g/L, but the process was slowed down again and had to be prolonged to nearly 400 h. This may be explained by the slow consumption of acetate which took 300 h to total depletion. Keeping the pH at 5.5 in the acetate fermentation did result in an inhibition of conidia germination; therefore, the initial pH was set to 6.5 and was not controlled throughout the process. A pH optimization of this fermentation could probably reduce fermentation time. A combination of acetate and aspartic acid did not result in any further increase of the maximum AOH concentration compared to the combination of glucose and ammonium/nitrate, but again TA and AME were not detected.

When AOH content is normalized to biomass (expressed as mg mycotoxin per g biomass) maintained concentrations were the following: 1.06 mg/g (glucose/ammonium and nitrate), 2.22 mg/g (glucose/aspartic acid), 3.35 mg/g (acetate/ammonium and nitrate) and 1.40 mg/g (acetate/aspartic acid).

Discussion

As it was shown with our results Alternaria toxins can be produced reproducibly in a bioreactor system under controlled conditions. Consumption of nutrient and mycotoxin formation can be characterized with logistic equations. The semi-synthetic Czapek-Dox broth is perfectly suitable for the elucidation of nutritional influences as it was shown previously by (Brzonkalik et al. 2011). Therefore, this medium was chosen for the fermentation experiments, but a further enhancement of mycotoxin production can be achieved by using other complex media.

Literature about mycotoxin production in bioreactor systems is rare; most studies were conducted in shaking flasks or solid media which cannot ensure optimal mixing, pH control and uniform supply with nutrients. Regulation of mycotoxin formation is very complex; fungal morphology and culture conditions have a great impact on mycotoxin production. As shown by (Brzonkalik et al. 2011) mycotoxin formation was different in static and in shaken culture although the same production strain and the same medium were used. Several different nitrogen and carbon sources were tested but whether mycotoxin production was higher in static or in shaken cultivation differed with each tested C or N source. With respect to the basal modified Czapek-Dox medium containing glucose and ammonium/nitrate cultivation in a bioreactor seems to be favorable since the maintained AOH concentrations are ~3 fold higher than in the shaking flask experiments mentioned by (Brzonkalik et al. 2011) and the standard deviations of detected mycotoxin concentrations were lower. However, biomass detection during the process remained difficult. The mycelium was not dispersed homologously in the culture broth. Therefore, reliable biomass determination during sampling was not possible and total biomass could only be quantified at the end of the process. Nevertheless, glucose consumption showed a typical logistic lapse which may be used as an indirect method for biomass determination as suggested for mammalian cells growing in packed-bed reactors (Meuwly et al. 2007). In case of Alternaria fermentations less comparable data exist. To the knowledge of the authors only one process in a stirred tank reactor was described in literature by (Hellwig et al. 2002) that reported the production of the new antibiotic altersetin. Due to structure similarities the author presumed that altersetin might be a derivative of TA. Furthermore, its formation was inhibited when nitrogen was restricted. Formation of TA during their process was mentioned but detected concentrations were not given. Optimization of stirrer speed and aeration rate in the bioreactor enhanced altersetin production considerably from 1.5 mg/L up to 25 mg/L. Bioreactor experiments do therefore not only provide more constant results, they offer also the possibility to study more parameters compared to shaking flasks, e.g. aeration. The aeration rate influences fungal morphology directly (Mantzouridou et al. 2002 Pfefferle et al. 2000 Stasinopolous and Seviour 1992 Wecker and Onken 1991) and fungal morphology in turn plays an important role in metabolism during fermentation (Cho et al. 2002 Metz and Kossen 1997). As shown in this study, decreased aeration rates led to an increase of free mycelium in form of pellets or filaments and to higher mycotoxin concentrations. The optimal aeration rate was found to be 0.013 vvm in combination with an agitation rate of 900 rpm. A high agitation was necessary in combination with low aeration rates to prevent blocking of the air sparger due to fungal growth. For altersetin production a higher aeration rate (0.3 vvm) combined with lower agitation (100 rpm) was found to be optimal, but altersetin concentrations were not given for lower or higher agitation rates (Hellwig et al. 2002). Aflatoxin production with Aspergillus flavus was optimized by testing aeration rates at a constant stirring speed of 100 rpm (Hayes et al. 1966). The authors detected a nearly 20 fold increase in aflatoxin production when the aeration was enhanced from 0.6 vvm to 0.9 vvm. A further increase to 1.2 vvm resulted in decreasing aflatoxin concentrations. The effect of two aeration rates (0.5 vvm and 0.05 vvm) on fumonisin production in Fusarium proliferatum was studied by (Keller et al. 1997). The higher aeration with 0.5 vvm at an agitation with 500 rpm caused an increase of fumonisin production compared to the lower aeration rate. Although the comparability between all these studies is limited, it can be stated that the aeration rate has a considerable impact on fungal metabolites production. With respect to the optimal aeration rate for mycotoxin production a general statement cannot be given, but all studies found aeration rate below 1.0 vvm to be supportive for their processes, but for each process agitation has to be taken into account. An enhanced stirrer speed results in an increased dispersity of gas bubbles and therefore in an increased oxygen transfer rate and dissolved oxygen content in the culture broth. Consequently, high agitation rates enable lower aeration rates. Additionally, the type of stirrer influences shear forces and gas dispersity, but stirrer types were not specified in the above mentioned studies.

As mentioned before, mycotoxin regulation is complex and many factors are influencing their formation, including nutritional factors. Mycotoxin production is affected by carbon and nitrogen metabolism mediated by global regulators like the Cys2His2 zinc finger transcription factors AreA (nitrogen metabolism) and CreA (carbon metabolism) and their homologues. Additionally, availability of precursor units for mycotoxin production may play a role (Yu and Keller 2005). However, regulation mechanisms of Alternaria toxin formation are not known and the biosynthetic gene clusters have not been identified yet.

Nevertheless, acetate serves as a precursor for all three mycotoxins: TA is formed from isoleucine and acetate (Stickings 1959 Stickings and Townsend 1961), the polyketides AOH and AME develop from a head to tail condensation of one molecule acetyl-CoA and six molecules of malonyl-CoA followed by a subsequent cyclization (Gatenbeck and Hermodsson 1965). Unsurprisingly, fermentation with acetate resulted in highest AOH concentration when normalized to biomass but inhibited formation of TA and AME. As shown in Figure 2 production of TA production appears to be growth-related in contrast to the polyketide mycotoxins. Simply feeding of precursor units did not enhance but inhibit TA production indicating further regulation mechanisms. The fact that acetate allows AOH but not AME production indicates for an independent regulation of the polyketide synthase and the methyltransferase enzyme which catalyzes the methylation reaction of AOH to AME (Stinson and Moreau 1986). An independent regulation of both enzymes was already presumed by (Orvehed et al. 1988). From a biotechnological point of view the possibility to produce single mycotoxins is desirable because less purification steps are necessary.

Considering the results of this study a defined process was successfully established enabling the elucidation of the effect of aeration rate, carbon and nitrogen sources on mycotoxin production. The presented process suits perfectly for further investigations of parameters influencing mycotoxin production and facilitates the comparability of different experiments.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was founded by the state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section II: Technical Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

References

  1. Abbas A, Valez H, Dobson AD: Analysis of the effect of nutritional factors on OTA and OTB biosynthesis and polyketide synthase gene expression in Aspergillus ochraceus . Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 135: 22–27. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Azcarate MP, Patriarca A, Terminiello L, Fernández Pinto V: Alternaria toxins in wheat during the 2004 to 2005 Argentinean harvest. J Food Prot 2008, 71: 1262–1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkai-Golan R: Alternaria mycotoxins. In Mycotoxins in fruits and vegetables. Edited by: Barkai-Golan R, Paster N. Elsevier, San Diego; 2008:86–89. 185–199Google Scholar
  4. Bennett JW, Klich M: Mycotoxins. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003, 16: 497–516. 10.1128/CMR.16.3.497-516.2003PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan RL, Stahl HG: Ability of various carbon sources to induce and support aflatoxin biosynthesis by Aspergillus parasiticus . J Food Saf 1984, 6: 271–279. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.1984.tb00488.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR): Stellungnahme des BfR vom 30. Juli 2003 Alternaria-Toxine in Lebensmitteln. 2003. [http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/208/alternaria_toxine_in_lebensmitteln.pdf]Google Scholar
  7. Bhatnagar D, Yu J, Ehrlich KC: Toxins of Filamentous Fungi. Volume 81. Edited by: Breitenbach M, Crameri R, Lehrer SB. Fungal Allergy and Pathogenicity. Chem Immunol Allergy; 2002:167–206.Google Scholar
  8. Bottalico A, Logrieco A: Toxigenic Alternaria species of economic importance. Edited by: Sinha KK, Bhatnager D. Mycotoxins in agriculture and food safety. Marcel Dekker, New York; 1998:65–108.Google Scholar
  9. Brzonkalik K, Herrling T, Syldatk C, Neumann A: The influence of different nitrogen and carbon sources on mycotoxin production in Alternaria alternata . Int J Food Microbiol 2011, 147: 120–126. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.016PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho YJ, Hwang HJ, Kim SW, Song CH, Yun JW: Effect of carbon source and aeration rate on broth rheology and fungal morphology during red pigment production by Paecilomyces sinclairii in a batch bioreactor. J Biotechnol 2002, 95: 13–23. 10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00445-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Demain AL: Regulation of secondary metabolism in fungi. Pure Appl Chem 1986, 58: 219–226. 10.1351/pac198658020219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong ZG, Liu GT, Dong ZM, Qian YZ, An YH, Miao JA, Zhen YZ: Induction of mutagenesis and transformation by the extract of Alternaria alternata isolated from grains in Linxian, China. Carcinogenesis 1987, 8: 989–991. 10.1093/carcin/8.7.989PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Erkmen O, Alben E: Mathematical modelling of citric acid production and biomass formation by Aspergillus niger in undersized semolina. J Food Eng 2002, 52: 161–166. 10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00099-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox EM, Howlett BJ: Secondary metabolism: regulation and role in fungal biology. Curr Opin Microbiol 2008, 11: 481–487. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.10.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gatenbeck S, Hermodsson S: Enzymic synthesis of the aromatic product alternariol. Acta Chem Scand 1965, 19: 65–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo LD, Xu L, Zheng WH, Hyde KD: Genetic variation of Alternaria alternata , an endophytic fungus isolated from Pinus tabulaeformis as determined by random amplified microsatellites (RAMS). Fungal Divers 2004, 16: 53–65.Google Scholar
  17. Hasan HAH: Alternaria mycotoxins in black rot lesion of tomato fruit: Conditions and regulation of their production. Mycopathologia 1995, 130: 171–177. 10.1007/BF01103101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes AW, Davis ND, Diener UL: Effect of aeration on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus in submerged culture. Appl Microbiol 1966, 14: 1019–1021.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellwig V, Grothe T, Mayer-Bartschmid A, Endermann R, Geschke FU, Henkel T, Stadler M: Altersetin, a new antibiotic from cultures of endophytic Alternaria spp. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, structure elucidation and biological activities. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2002, 55: 881–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiao F, Kawakami A, Nakajima T: Effects of different carbon sources on trichothecene production and Tri gene expression by Fusarium graminearum in liquid culture. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008, 285: 212–219. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01235.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller SE, Sullivan TM, Chirtel S: Factors affecting the growth of Fusarium proliferatum and the production of fumonisin B1: oxygen and pH. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1997, 19: 305–309. 10.1038/sj.jim.2900466PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lau BP, Scott PM, Lewis DA, Kanhere SR, Cléroux C, Roscoe VA: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of the Alternaria mycotoxins alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in fruit juices and beverages. J Chromatogr A 2003, 998: 119–131. 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00606-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Li F, Yoshizawa T: Alternaria mycotoxins in weathered wheat from China. J Agric Food Chem 2000, 48: 2920–2924. 10.1021/jf0000171PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu GT, Qian YZ, Zhang P, Dong WH, Qi YM, Guo HT: Etiological role of Alternaria alternata in human esophageal cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 1992, 105: 394–400.Google Scholar
  25. Liu GT, Qian YZ, Zhang P, Dong ZM, Shi ZY, Zhen YZ, Miao J, Xu YM: Relationships between Alternaria alternata and oesophageal cancer. IARC Sci Publ 1991, 105: 258–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Magan N, Cayley GR, Lacey J: Effect of water activity and temperature on mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata in culture and on wheat grain. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 47: 1113–1117.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mantzouridou F, Roukas T, Kotzekidou P: Effect of the aeration rate and agitation speed on β-carotene production and morphology of Blakeslea trispora in a stirred-tank reactor: mathematical modeling. Biochem Eng J 2002, 10: 123–135. 10.1016/S1369-703X(01)00166-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Medina A, Mateo EM, Valle-Algarra FM, Mateo F, Mateo R, Jiménez M: Influence of nitrogen and carbon sources on the production of ochratoxin A by ochratoxigenic strains of Aspergillus spp. isolated from grapes. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 122: 93–99. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.055PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Metz B, Kossen NWF: The growth of molds in the form of pellets-a literature review. Biotechnol Bioeng 1977, 19: 781–799. 10.1002/bit.260190602View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Meuwly F, Ruffieux PA, Kadouri A, von Stockar U: Packed-bed bioreactors for mammalian cell culture: bioprocess and biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv 2007, 25: 45–56. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.08.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Motta SD, Valente Soares LM: Survey of Brazilian tomato products for alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether, tenuazonic acid and cyclopiazonic acid. Food Addit Contam 2001, 18: 630–634.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Orvehed M, Häggblom P, Söderhäll K: Nitrogen inhibition of mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata . Appl Environ Microbiol 1988, 54: 2361–2364.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Panigrahi S: Alternaria toxins. In Handbook of plant and fungal toxicants. Edited by: D'Mello JPF. CRC Press, Boca Raton; 1997:319–337.Google Scholar
  34. Patriarca A, Azcarate MB, Terminiello L, Fernández Pinto V: Mycotoxin production by Alternaria strains isolated from Argentinean wheat. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 119: 219–222. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.055PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pero RW, Posner H, Blois M, Harvan D, Spalding JW: Toxicity of metabolites produced by the " Alternaria ". Environ Health Perspect 1973, 4: 87–94.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pfefferle C, Theobald U, Gürtler H, Fiedler H: Improved secondary metabolite production in the genus Streptosporangium by optimization of the fermentation conditions. J Biotechnol 2000, 80: 135–142. 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00249-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pons A, Roca P, Aguiló C, Garcia FJ, Alemany M, Palou A: A method for the simultaneous determination of total carbohydrate and glycerol in biological samples with the anthrone reagent. J Biochem Biophys Methods 1981, 4: 227–231. 10.1016/0165-022X(81)90060-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Pose G, Patriarca A, Kyanko V, Pardo A, Fernández Pinto V: Water activity and temperature effects on mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata on a synthetic tomato medium. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 142: 348–353. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.017PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pozzi CR, Braghini R, Arcaro JR, Zorzete P, Israel AL, Pozar IO, Denucci S, Corrêa B: Mycoflora and occurrence of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in Brazilian sunflower from sowing to harvest. J Agric Food Chem 2005, 53: 5824–5828. 10.1021/jf047884gPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt-Heydt M, Magan N, Geisen R: Stress induction of mycotoxin biosynthesis genes by abiotic factors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008, 284: 142–149. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01182.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt-Heydt M, Rüfer C, Raupp F, Bruchmann A, Perrone G, Geisen R: Influence of light on food relevant fungi with emphasis on ochratoxin producing species. Int J Food Microbiol 2011, 145: 229–237. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.022PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Schrader TJ, Cherry W, Soper K, Langlois I, Vijay HM: Examination of Alternaria alternata mutagenicity and effects of nitrosylation using the Ames Salmonella test. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 2001, 21: 261–274. 10.1002/tcm.1014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Shephard GS, Thiel PG, Sydenham EW, Vleggaar R, Marasas WF: Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of tenuazonic acid and related tetramic acids. J Chromatogr 1991, 566: 195–205. 10.1016/0378-4347(91)80124-UPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh J, Majumdar D, Panday A, Panday AK: Solid substrate fermentation of mycoherbicidal agent Alternaria alternata FGCC#25. Recent Research in Science and Technology 2010, 2: 22–27.Google Scholar
  45. Söderhäll K, Svensson E, Unestam T: Light inhibits the production of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in Alternaria alternata . Appl Environ Microbiol 1978, 36: 655–657.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stasinopoulos SJ, Seviour RJ: Exopolysaccharide production by Acremonium persicinum in stirred-tank and air-lift fermentors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1992, 36: 465–468.Google Scholar
  47. Stickings CE: Studies in the biochemistry of micro-organisms. 106. Metabolites of Alternaria tenuis auct.: the structure of tenuazonic acid. Biochem J 1959, 72: 332–340.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stickings CE, Townsend RJ: Studies in the biochemistry of micro-organisms. 108. Metabolites of Alternaria tenuis Auct.: the biosynthesis of tenuazonic acid. Biochem J 1961, 78: 412–420.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stinson EE, Osman SF, Heisler EG, Siciliano J, Bills DD: Mycotoxin production in whole tomatoes, apples, oranges, and lemons. J Agric Food Chem 1981, 29: 790–792. 10.1021/jf00106a025PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Stinson EE, Moreau RA: Partial purification and some properties of an alternariol-o-methyltransferase from Alternaria tenuis . Phytochemistry 1986, 25: 2721–2724.Google Scholar
  51. Terminiello L, Patriarca A, Pose G, Fernández Pinto V: Occurrence of alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether and tenuazonic acid in Argentinean tomato puree. Mycotoxin Res 2006, 22: 236–240. 10.1007/BF02946748PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Visconti A, Logrieco A, Bottalico A: Natural occurrence of Alternaria mycotoxins in olive-their production and possible transfer into the oil. Food Addit Contam 1986, 3: 323–330. 10.1080/02652038609373599PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wecker A, Onken U: Influence of dissolved oxygen concentration and shear rate on the production of pullulan by Aureobasidium pullulans . Biotechnol Lett 1991, 13: 155–160. 10.1007/BF01025810View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu JH, Keller N: Regulation of secondary metabolism in filamentous fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2005, 43: 437–58. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.140214PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brzonkalik et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement