Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effects of yeast culture on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial community of high concentrate diet in sheep

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate effects of different yeast culture (YC) levels on in vitro fermentation characteristics and bacterial and fungal community under high concentrate diet. A total of 5 groups were included in the experiment: control group without YC (CON), YC1 (0.5% YC proportion of substrate dry matter), YC2 (1%), YC3 (1.5%) and YC4 (2%). After 48 h of fermentation, the incubation fluids and residues were collected to analyze the ruminal fermentation parameters and bacterial and fungal community. Results showed that the ruminal fluid pH of YC2 and YC4 groups was higher (P < 0.05) than that of CON group. Compared with CON group, the microbial protein, propionate and butyrate concentrations and cumulative gas production at 48 h of YC2 group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), whereas an opposite trend of ammonia nitrogen and lactate was observed between two groups. Microbial analysis showed that the Chao1 and Shannon indexes of YC2 group were higher (P < 0.05) than those of CON group. Additionally, YC supplementation significantly decreased (P < 0.05) Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001, Streptococcus bovis and Neosetophoma relative abundances. An opposite tendency of Aspergillus abundance was found between CON and YC treatments. Compared with CON group, the relative abundances of Prevotella, Succiniclasticum, Butyrivibrio and Megasphaera elsdenii were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in YC2 group, while Apiotrichum and unclassified Clostridiales relative abundances were decreased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, high concentrate substrate supplemented with appropriate YC (1%) can improve ruminal fermentation and regulate bacterial and fungal composition.

Introduction

In recent years, the increased consumption in meat has greatly promoted the development of animal farming, especially in sheep. As a food source that can supply high quality fat and protein as well as key vitamins, mutton plays an important role in the global nutrition security (Vahmani et al. 2020). With the continuous development of intensive meat sheep breeding, fattening has gradually developed into the main mode of meat sheep production. However, the roughage resources with high quality are limited in some parts of the world. In order to meet the nutrient requirements for high production performance, sheep are usually fed with rations high in concentrates. Nevertheless, sheep fed concentrate-rich diets leads to metabolic acidosis, reducing feed efficiency and damaging gastrointestinal function (Lu et al. 2023). Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) is a common kind of metabolic acidosis, which can decrease ruminal pH and induce the microbial death to release endotoxins and gastrointestinal dysfunction, leading to reduced feed intake, immune function and production performance of ruminants (Ma et al. 2021). Previous studies have found that buffering agent (Erdman 1988), monensin (Pacheco et al. 2023), lactic acid bacteria (Fenta et al. 2023) and organic acids (Vyas et al. 2015) can be used in alleviating the damage of gastrointestinal function caused by SARA. Although these strategies can attenuate the economic losses caused by SARA to a certain extent, they also have some drawbacks, such as high cost, drug residue and resistance, and cannot fundamentally solve the problem of SARA. Thus, finding an effective method without side effects to prevent the occurrence of SARA is important for intensive breeding industry of meat sheep.

As a kind of microbial fermentation product, yeast culture (YC) is commonly used as a feed additive in animals’ production. YC is mainly composed of yeast extracellular metabolites, variable culture medium after fermentation, cell wall components and a small number of inactive yeast cells (Wang et al. 2023). In addition, YC is rich in nutrients, including amino acids, vitamins, oligosaccharides and unidentified growth factors, which are conducive to promoting production performance and enhancing gastrointestinal function of animals (Wang et al. 2022a). YC can provide essential nutrients mentioned above for lactic acid bacteria, such as Megasphaera elsdenii and Selenomonas ruminantium, which stimulate the growth of lactate-utilizing bacteria, thereby converting excessive lactic acid into volatile fatty acid (VFA), reducing the accumulation of lactic acid in the rumen and stabilizing the ruminal pH (Gao and Geng 2022). A previous study in dairy cows has verified that YC can regulate rumen pH, maintain the stability of ruminal environment, promote the absorption of VFA by ruminal epithelium and reduce the inflammatory response induced by high concentrate feeding (Li et al. 2016). Moreover, the metabolites of yeast can promote growth of protein-synthesizing (e.g. Amylococci, Amylosarcinae and Amylospirillae) and cellulolytic bacteria (e.g. Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens), thus increasing efficiency of microorganisms using ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) to synthesize the microbial protein (MCP), which finally promote ruminal fermentation and improve feed conversion rate (Halfen et al. 2021).

The influence of yeast products supplementation in the ration on ruminants have been widely investigated. However, the research results exist differences (Zaworski et al. 2014; Olagaray et al. 2019; Dai et al. 2023). The differences of research results might be associated with differences in supplemental levels of yeast products, growth stage of animals and type of strain. Nevertheless, the information of effects of different doses of YC supplementation on ruminal fermentation profile in fattening sheep fed high concentrate diet remains scarce. With the development of science and technology, the in vitro fermentation technique has been commonly utilized as an effective method to evaluate the nutritional value of feed additive of ruminal fermentation (Tunkala et al. 2023). On the other hand, because of the conventional viewpoint in the bacteria as the primary functional microorganisms of rumen, the majority of studies focused on the bacterial composition in the rumen of ruminants (Ma et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2023). In fact, the fungal community acts as an essential role in the digestion of cellulose (Tong et al. 2023). Therefore, in the current study, we performed an in vitro experiment to assess the influence of YC supplementation levels on ruminal fermentation profile and bacterial and fungal community of high concentrate diet in sheep. We hypothesized that sheep fed high concentrate diet supplemented with appropriate YC dose would regulate the bacterial and fungal composition to alter the ruminal characteristics.

Materials and methods

Ruminal fluid preparation

A total of 6 male Hu sheep (32.2 ± 0.8 kg of body weight and 4-month-old) fitted with rumen cannulas were used as the donors of ruminal fluid for in vitro fermentation. Sheep were fed twice daily at 08:00 and 18:00 respectively, and had free access to clean water. The feed ingredients and nutrient composition of experimental diet are presented in Table 1. Before morning feeding, approximately 200 mL of ruminal fluid samples were obtained by ruminal cannulas from each sheep. Subsequently, the samples were filtered by 4 layers of cheesecloth, and then transferred to a prewarmed thermos bottle that was filled with CO2 in advance at 39 ℃ in a water bath for subsequent experiment.

Table 1 Feed ingredients and nutritional levels of experimental diet (DM basis)

Experimental design and in vitro fermentation inoculation

A total of 5 kg of experimental diet, the same as what was offered to the donor sheep, were collected for utilization as substrate for in vitro fermentation trial. The YC (Angel yeast Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei, China; main ingredients: crude protein ≥ 30%; mannan oligosaccharide ≥ 2%; yeast count ≥ 1 × 107 CFU/g) was mixed with the substrate to obtain 5 groups: control with no YC (CON), YC1 (YC proportion was 0.50%), YC2 (1%), YC3 (1.5%) and YC4 (2%). The buffer solution was prepared according to the procedures described by Menke et al. (1979). Next, CO2 was pumped into the buffer solution until the pH was 6.8. The in vitro incubation trials were carried out with an anaerobic glass bottle (120 mL). To each individual bottle, 25 mL of filtered ruminal fluid, 500 mg of substrate and 50 mL of buffer solution were added. Incubation bottles were injected with CO2 continuously to keep the anaerobic environment. After mixture, the incubation bottles were firmly sealed using rubber plugs and aluminium covers, and subsequently, the bottles were individually connected to the gas inlets of Automated Trace Gas Recording System (AGRS, Beijing, China) (Bai et al. 2018) using medical plastic infusion pipes for continuously recording cumulative gas production (GP). The bottles were cultivated in a constant incubator (Sheyan Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 39 ℃ for 48 h, and each treatment included 4 replicates.

Samples collection, analysis and calculation

After incubation, the bottles were separated from AGRS system. Immediately, the pH value of ruminal liquid was determined with a pH meter (INESA Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Then, the materials of bottles after fermentation were filtered by dried nylon bags (8 × 12 cm with a pore size of 50 μm) to collect incubation fluid. Next, the incubation fluid was placed into 5 mL sterile tubes and stored at -80 ℃ for measurement of microbial composition and fermentation characteristics. Finally, the residues of each incubation bottle were dried at 65 ℃ to a constant weight for measurement of dry matter (DM). The in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) was calculated from the DM loss following the method described by Zhang and Yang (2011).

The concentration of NH3-N in incubation fluid was determined according to the phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetry procedures (Broderick and Kang 1980). Moreover, MCP content was analyzed following the method described by Makkar et al. (1982). The gas chromatography (JC-7890, Juchuang Group Co., Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong, China) was utilized to analyze the VFA concentrations, including acetate, propionate, butyrate, isovalerate and valerate (Sun et al. 2022). The non-glucogenic-to-glucogenic acids (NGR) ratio was calculated by NGR = (acetate + 2 butyrate + valerate) / (propionate + valerate) (Zhang and Yang 2011). In this equation, acetate, butyrate, propionate, and valerate are expressed in mole fractions (mol, %) of total VFA yield at the end of incubation.

The cumulative GP at 48 h (GP48, mL/g) recorded by AGRS system was used to analyze kinetic indexes of GP using a nonlinear model (Groot et al. 1996) of SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) as follows: GP48 = A / [1 + (C/48)B ]. In addition, the average gas production rate (AGPR) was calculated by a formula as follows: AGPR = (A × B) / (4 × C). In the above-mentioned equations, “A” represents theoretical maximum of GP; “B” is an index reflecting the shape of curve; “C” is the time (h) when the maximum GP reaches half.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Total microbial genomic DNA was isolated from incubation fluid using the Omega DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The concentration and purity of extracted DNA were assessed through a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis. To amplify hypervariable region V3-V4 of the bacterial 16 S rRNA gene, the universal primers 338 F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′- GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were used (Yang et al. 2022b). In addition, the primers ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) of fungi were utilized to amplify the ITS1 of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (Huang et al. 2023). The PCR amplification cycling conditions were conducted according to the following process: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturing at 94 ℃ for 30 s, annealing at 56 ℃ for 45 s, extension at 72 ℃ for 45 s, and single extension at 72 ℃ for 10 min. Three replicates were carried out for each sample, and PCR products were purified from 2% agarose gel using the kit AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified with Quantus™ Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Sequencing libraries were generated using TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and the library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.

Bioinformatic analysis

The original sequence of each sample was spliced according to the unique barcodes following by truncation of barcodes sequence. Then, the raw tags were filtered using Trimmomatic (version 0.33) to obtain cleaned tag data (Bolger et al. 2014). Following that, the Uchime algorithm was utilized to eliminate the chimeric sequences using the Gold database to provide clean reads (Edgar et al. 2011). Tags were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity threshold by the Usearch software (version 10.0) (Edgar 2013). The Silva database (version 138.1) (Quast et al. 2013) and UCLUST (Edgar 2010) were used to assign the taxonomic OTU. Finally, the PyNAST was utilized to compare and filter the representative sequences (Gregory et al. 2010). To avoid affecting community diversity caused by sequencing depth, the samples that have the least number of reads were deemed to be a standard for resampling.

The sequencing data analysis was performed using R software (version 3.5.3). Alpha- and beta-diversity were finished by Vegan. The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was carried out through the ape package based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices obtained by vegdist function of Vegan (Paradis et al. 2004). Moreover, using the adonis function of Vegan, the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) was calculated. The heat map was obtained with the dominant bacteria or fungi using the z-score normalization for each sample (z score = [actual relative abundance of a genus − mean relative abundance of the same genus] / standard deviation) (Ma et al. 2020). The heat map was drawn using online resources ImageGP (https://www.bic.ac.cn/ImageGP).

Statistical analysis

Before analysis, all data were firstly performed normality and homogeneity of variances tests. Variables of DM in vitro degradability, fermentation parameters and in vitro gas production and kinetic parameters were analyzed by one-way ANOVA procedure of the SPSS software (version 22.0). Tukey test was utilized to evaluate the differences among all treatments. The microbial data including alpha-diversity index and relative abundance was analyzed using the non-parametric test of the SPSS software. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were conducted to assess the linear and quadratic effects of YC levels. Results were presented as means and standard error of the mean. The significance level of DM in vitro degradability, fermentation parameters, in vitro gas production and kinetic parameters and alpha-diversity indexes was declared at P < 0.05, and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 represented a tendency. P-values of < 0.05 after false discovery rate correction of microbial composition using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for the multiple comparisons were deemed to be significant, and a trend was declared at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Results

In vitro degradability of dry matter and ruminal fermentation characteristics

As shown in Table 2, no significant difference (P > 0.05) of IVDMD was found among all groups. The in vitro ruminal fluid pH of YC2 and YC4 groups was higher (P < 0.05) than that of CON group. Compared with YC2 and YC3 groups, the NH3-N concentration in CON and YC4 groups was significantly increased (P < 0.05). The MCP content in YC1 and YC2 groups was significantly elevated (P < 0.05) when compared to other groups. On the contrary, the lactate concentration of CON group was higher (P < 0.05) than that of YC2, YC3 and YC4 groups. In vitro ruminal fluid total VFA, acetate, isovalerate and valerate occurred at similar levels (P > 0.05) among all 5 groups. However, compared with CON group, the propionate and butyrate contents of YC2 and YC3 group were significantly increased (P < 0.05). Additionally, the acetate-to-propionate ratio and NGR in YC2 and YC3 groups were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) as compared with CON, YC1 and YC4 groups.

Table 2 Effects of high concentrate diet supplemented with different YC levels on in vitro degradability of DM and ruminal fermentation profile after 48 h of incubation

In vitro ruminal gas production characteristics

Obviously, GP48 in CON and YC1 groups was lower (P < 0.05) than that in YC2, YC3 and YC4 groups (Table 3). A similar trend of inflection point on the curve parameter was observed. Fermentation substrate supplemented with YC significantly enhanced (P < 0.05) theoretical maximum of GP, while an opposite tendency was found in parameter “C” between CON and YC treatments. Besides, the AGPR of YC2 and YC4 groups was significantly elevated (P < 0.05) when compared to that of CON and YC1 groups.

Table 3 Effects of high concentrate diet supplemented with different YC levels on in vitro gas production and kinetic parameters

Bacterial diversity

In total, 685 492 high-quality sequences were obtained from incubated ruminal fluid samples of 5 groups after filtering, with an average of 34 274 ± 1880 sequences per sample. The average sequencing length was 296 ± 2.25 bp (Supplementary Table S1). The numbers of OTUs were 1739, 1820, 2888, 2905 and 2660 in the CON, YC1, YC2, YC3 and YC4 groups, respectively, based on a 97% sequence similarity. Moreover, the average Good’s coverage was more than 0.99, indicating that a sufficient number of sequences were obtained to reflect the bacterial community of the examined samples.

There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) of Simpson index among all groups (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, the Chao1 index of YC3 group was higher (P < 0.05) than that of CON and YC1 groups (Fig. 1A). Likewise, compared with CON and YC1 groups, the Shannon index in YC2 group was significantly increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Supplementation of YC significantly increased (P < 0.05) the ACE index of bacterial community (Fig. 1B). Additionally, PCoA plot based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used to reflect the differences in bacterial composition of 5 groups. Results showed that the bacterial communities in 5 groups were clearly separated from each other (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the alpha-diversity indexes of bacterial community in incubated ruminal fluid among different treatments. (A) Chao1 index; (B) ACE index; (C) Shannon index; (D) Simpson index. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%. Columns with different small letters mean significant differences (P < 0.05)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacteria (A) and fungal (B) communities in the incubated ruminal fluid based on Bray–Curtis distance. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%

Bacterial composition

At the taxonomic level, we observed a total of 20 phyla in the incubated ruminal fluid of 20 samples. The Bacteroidetes (CON = 42.83%, YC1 = 46.69%, YC2 = 44.99%, YC3 = 47.39% and YC4 = 45.04%), Firmicutes (CON = 37.99%, YC1 = 37.77%, YC2 = 41.51%, YC3 = 40.93% and YC4 = 39.72%) and Proteobacteria (CON = 15.47%, YC1 = 12.17%, YC2 = 10.13%, YC3 = 8.68% and YC4 = 11.27%) were the dominant bacteria in the incubated ruminal fluid, accounting for more than 95% of the total sequences (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S2). No obvious difference (P > 0.05) of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria relative abundances was found among all groups. However, compared with CON group, the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobiota of YC2 group was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). YC supplementation significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Proteobacteria. Furthermore, the Proteobacteria relative abundance of YC3 group was lower (P < 0.05) than that of YC1 group.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bacterial composition at phylum level in the incubated ruminal fluid of 5 groups. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%

At the genus level (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table S3), the Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 (CON = 27.17%, YC1 = 19.35%, YC2 = 14.42%, YC3 = 16.27% and YC4 = 20.34%) was the most dominant bacterium in the incubated ruminal fluid, followed by Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (CON = 17.81%, YC1 = 15.67%, YC2 = 15.54%, YC3 = 17.21% and YC4 = 15.62%) and Norank_f__F082 (CON = 9.93%, YC1 = 14.27%, YC2 = 15.70%, YC3 = 15.74% and YC4 = 13.23%). The relative abundances of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 and Streptococcus bovis were higher (P < 0.05) in CON group than those in YC supplementation groups, whereas an opposite trend of Norank_f__F082 was found between CON and YC treatments. The YC2 group showed highest relative abundance of Succiniclasticum and higher (P < 0.05) than other groups. Compared with CON group, the NK3A20_group, Muribaculaceae and Megasphaera elsdenii relative abundances of YC2 and YC4 groups were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05). Besides, the relative abundance of Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 in YC3 and YC4 groups was higher (P < 0.05) than that in CON and YC1 groups. Compared with CON group, the relative abundances of Prevotella and Butyrivibrio in YC1, YC2 and YC3 groups were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05), while an opposite tendency of unclassified Clostridiales was observed between CON and these YC treatments.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Heat map showing the relative abundance of main bacteria at genus level in the incubated ruminal fluid of 5 groups. The genus with the average relative abundance was ≥ 1% in at least one group. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%

Fungal diversity

For the fungal analysis, 756 134 qualified ITS sequences were detected from incubated ruminal fluid samples, with an average of 37807 ± 1738 sequences per sample, and the average sequencing length was 353 ± 6.38 bp (Supplementary Table S4). All sequences were clustered to 1030, 1052, 1189, 1149 and 1143 fungal OTUs in the CON, YC1, YC2, YC3 and YC4 groups, respectively. In addition, the average Good’s coverage was > 0.99, which indicated that the number of sequences could reflect the diversity and composition of fungal community.

The ACE (Fig. 5B) and Simpson (Fig. 5D) indexes were similar (P < 0.05) among all groups. However, the Chao1 index of YC2 and YC4 groups was higher (P < 0.05) than that of CON group (Fig. 5A). Compared with CON group, incubated ruminal fluid supplemented with YC significantly enhanced (P < 0.05) the Shannon index (Fig. 5C). Beta-diversity analysis of PCoA displayed obvious differences of fungal community distribution among 5 treatments (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of the alpha-diversity indexes of fungal community in incubated ruminal fluid among different treatments. (A) Chao1 index; (B) ACE index; (C) Shannon index; (D) Simpson index. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%. Columns with different small letters mean significant differences (P < 0.05)

Fungal composition

The predominant fungal phyla included Ascomycota (CON = 56.87%, YC1 = 62.01%, YC2 = 67.17%, YC3 = 60.61% and YC4 = 60.02%) in all incubated ruminal fluid, followed by Basidiomycota (CON = 25.61%, YC1 = 28.27%, YC2 = 25.58%, YC3 = 31.99% and YC4 = 30.58%) (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table S5). Fermentation substrate supplemented with YC did not obviously affect the relative abundances of Neocallimastigomycota, Mortierellomycota and Mortierellomycota (P > 0.05). However, the relative abundance of Ascomycota in YC2 group was higher (P < 0.05) than that in CON group. Compared with CON and YC2 groups, the relative abundance of Basidiomycota in YC3 group was significantly elevated (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the unclassified_k__Fungi relative abundance in CON group was significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05) when compared to that in YC3 and YC4 groups.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Fungal composition at phylum level in the incubated ruminal fluid of 5 groups. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%

At the genus level, Aspergillus (CON = 16.47%, YC1 = 24.42%, YC2 = 29.48%, YC3 = 28.93% and YC4 = 24.91%), unclassified_p__Ascomycota (CON = 8.37%, YC1 = 7.28%, YC2 = 13.04%, YC3 = 11.47% and YC4 = 14.17%) and Apiotrichum (CON = 16.59%, YC1 = 13.21%, YC2 = 8.63%, YC3 = 12.06% and YC4 = 11.65%) were the predominant genera (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table S6). The relative abundance of Aspergillus in CON group was higher (P < 0.05) than that in YC treatments, whereas an opposite tendency of Neosetophoma was found between CON and YC treatments. Compared with CON group, the relative abundances of Apiotrichum and Sterigmatomyces in YC2 group were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). YC2 treatment showed highest relative abundances of Microascus, Ascochyta and Monascus, and higher (P < 0.05) than YC1, YC4 and YC3 treatments, respectively. In addition, the unclassified_p__Ascomycota relative abundance of YC4 group was significantly elevated (P < 0.05) when compared to YC1 group. Conversely, the relative abundance of Penicillium in YC1 group was higher (P < 0.05) than YC3 group. The relative abundance of Vishniacozyma in YC1 group was higher (P < 0.05) than that in CON, YC2 and YC4 groups.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Heat map showing the relative abundance of main fungi at genus level in the incubated ruminal fluid of 5 groups. The genus with the average relative abundance was ≥ 1% in at least one group. YC, yeast culture. CON, fermentation substrate with no YC; YC1, fermentation substrate supplemented with 0.50% YC; YC2, 1%; YC3, 1.5%; YC4, 2%

Discussion

After overfeeding of concentrate-rich diets, the excessive fermentable carbohydrates are converted into a large amount of organic acids under the action of ruminal microorganisms, resulting in reduction of ruminal pH and further ruminal acidosis (Ma et al. 2021). YC is rich in B vitamins, trace elements, unknown nutrient factors, oligosaccharides, digestive enzymes, amino acids, organic acids and carbohydrates. In recent years, YC has been widely used in ruminants’ production, which can improve rumen fermentation mode and animal production performance (Gao and Geng 2022; Wang et al. 2022a). Our study investigated the effects of YC on the in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial community of high concentrate diet in sheep. Ruminal fluid pH is a comprehensive parameter that can be used to reflect ruminal fermentation and health status. In general, the SARA is characterized by a reduction of ruminal pH below 5.6 (Ma et al. 2021). The lower pH in the rumen has negative influence on the growth and proliferation of microorganisms, and causes the death of ruminal microorganisms to release endotoxins, which leads to dysfunction of the ruminal epithelium (Steele et al. 2011). Our results showed that fermentation substrate supplemented with YC (1% and 2%) increased the ruminal fluid pH, indicating that YC had the ability to improve the reduction of ruminal pH induced by high concentrate. The value of ruminal pH is related to lactate and VFA concentrations. We did not find obvious difference of VFA concentration, but the YC2, YC3 and YC4 groups displayed significantly reduced lactate content, which were in line with pH results. Previous study in dairy cows found that supplementation of YC reduced the ruminal lactate concentration (Dias et al. 2018), which was consistent with our study.

The carbohydrate composition is a key factor to affect the IVDMD (Wang et al. 2022b). In the current study, no difference of IVDMD existed among all groups of incubated ruminal fluid, suggesting that YC could alter the carbohydrate composition of incubated ruminal fluid. However, the NH3-N concentration of YC2 and YC3 groups was lower than that of CON and YC4 groups, which indicated that YC could improve the utilization of NH3-N in the ruminal fluid. In growing bulls, Zhang et al. (2022) reported that dietary supplementation of YC could decrease the ruminal NH3-N content and increase the MCP concentration, which were in accordance with our findings. The positive effect of YC on ruminal NH3-N could be attributed with the action of YC on ruminal microbial community. YC can stimulate the microbial growth related to nitrogen utilization, which is manifested in increased utilization of NH3-N by ruminal microorganisms (Carpinelli et al. 2021). The decrease in NH3-N levels of incubated ruminal fluid was not caused by protein degradation or deamination of protein, but because the stimulation of YC in the ruminal microorganisms to utilize NH3-N and synthesize MCP (Carpinelli et al. 2021). Interestingly, the MCP content of YC2 group was significantly increased when compared to CON, YC3 and YC4 groups, which was consistent with NH3-N results. Nevertheless, excessive supplementation of YC in fermentation substrate increased NH3-N content and reduced MCP content. The possible reason is that some ingredients such as organic acid in YC inhibit the growth of ruminal microorganisms, which lead to reduced utilization of NH3-N. But the specific mechanism of action still needs investigation. The microbial community has an important influence on the NH3-N utilization and MCP synthesis in the rumen. Thus, we performed the following research to evaluate the effects of YC on bacterial and fungal community of incubated ruminal fluid.

Yeast products are known to regulate the ruminal pH changes, in part by stimulating microorganisms to metabolize lactate into VFA, thereby reducing lactate accumulation in ruminal fluid (Desnoyers et al. 2009). Unfortunately, we only found numerical elevation of total VFA between CON and YC groups. However, the concentrations of propionate and butyrate in incubated ruminal fluid of YC2 and YC3 groups were higher than those of CON group. As an important energy substrate, glucose plays a vital role in animals’ metabolism. For ruminants, liver gluconeogenesis is main process of glucose production, and propionate is an important precursor of gluconeogenesis (Lu et al. 2022). Therefore, although our experiment is in vitro study, the propionate results obtained in the current study could provide more energy for the body. In dairy calves, a previous experiment reported that yeast products increased the proportions of Butyrivibrio and lactate-utilizing bacteria, which was beneficial for increasing ruminal propionate and butyrate contents (Xiao et al. 2016). The SARA has adverse effects on the ruminal epithelial function, including induction of inflammatory reaction and reduction absorption ability of VFA and other nutrients (Ma et al. 2021). Butyrate can attenuate the inflammatory reaction in the ruminal epithelium by activating G protein-coupled receptors 41 (Yang et al. 2022a). Moreover, butyrate has the ability to improve the ruminal epithelial morphology and enhance the ruminal villus surface area, which are conducive to increasing the ruminal absorption ability for VFA (Fukumori et al. 2022). Thus, the elevated butyrate concentration in incubated ruminal fluid might have positive influence on relieving VFA accumulation. However, this result need further elucidation using in vivo experiment. In addition, fermentation substrate supplemented with YC significantly reduced acetate-to-propionate ratio, indicating that YC supplementation could promote the transformation of rumen fermentation type to propionate fermentation type under the condition of high concentrate substrate. Ruminal propionate type fermentation can provide more energy, which has positive role for maintaining production performance of animals (Pacheco et al. 2023). We also found that all YC treatments remarkably reduced NGR value, which implied that a shift from acetate towards propionate and butyrate was induced by YC action. In combination with NH3-N and MCP results, the appropriate additive amount of YC was from 1 to 1.5%.

The in vitro fermentation GP is a key parameter that can be used to reflect the fermentative degree of substrate nutrients by ruminal microbial community. Generally, higher gas production means higher degree of substrate fermentation (Zhang et al. 2020). A recent study found that yeast products supplementation significantly increased the maximum gas production of fermentation substrate as well as GP48 (Cagliari et al. 2023), which were in accordance with our results. The lower gas production in CON group was mainly due to the insufficient activity of microorganisms. After supplementation of YC, the activity of microorganisms in incubated ruminal fluid was enhanced. It might be that YC was rich in minerals, polysaccharides, small peptides and digestive enzymes, which promoted the rapid proliferation of ruminal microorganisms and thus increased the degradation rate of fermentation substrate (Wang et al. 2022a).

As an important digestive organ of ruminants, the rumen harbors a great deal of microorganisms. To a certain degree, the rumen is controllable, and reasonable adjustment can regulate the microbial composition in the rumen, which is helpful for maintaining healthy of animals (Xu et al. 2023). In this experiment, YC supplementation (1%) increased the Chao1, ACE and Shannon indexes of incubated ruminal fluid, indicating that appropriate addition of YC would increase the richness and diversity of ruminal bacterial community. This is inconsistent with a research by Dai et al. (Dai et al. 2023), who found that supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture did not affect the alpha-diversity of ruminal bacteria. The reason may be that the processing technology of yeast products is different. Consistent with previous study in sheep (Wang et al. 2023), the predominant phyla in the current experiment were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The relative abundance of Proteobacteria were significantly reduced in YC treatments, which proved that YC can improve the immunity of animals. Proteobacteria has been reported to induce gastrointestinal infection or inflammation since it has many pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia coli and Salmonella (Shin et al. 2015).

At the genus level, YC supplementation significantly reduced the relative abundance of Streptococcus bovis, and besides, the YC2 and YC4 groups showed higher relative abundance of Megasphaera elsdenii as compared with CON group. The Megasphaera elsdenii is lactate-consuming bacteria and Streptococcus bovis is lactate-producing bacteria. Our results indicated that YC supplementation could reduce the ruminal lactate content, which was conducive to relieving SARA. The ingredients of YC including amino acid, peptide, vitamin and organic acid can provide nutrients to promote the growth of lactate-consuming bacteria (Desnoyers et al. 2009), thus reducing the accumulation of lactate in the rumen, and finally stabilizing the ruminal pH. We also found that YC supplementation significantly reduced Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 relative abundance. The main fermentation product of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 is succinic acid, and Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 is a competitor with methanogens for methanogenesis (McCabe et al. 2015). Thus, it is logical to see these genera with reduced abundance in YC treatments because of the elevated gas production. A previous study in dairy cows reported that feeding YC increased the cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen (Halfen et al. 2021). Consistent with previous study, our study found that the relative abundances of Norank_f__F082, Prevotella, Succiniclasticum, NK3A20_group, Muribaculaceae and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 in YC2 group were higher than those in CON group, indicating that YC can improve performance of animals by influencing the ruminal bacterial community to support growth and activity of cellulolytic microorganisms. On the other hand, the main fermentation product of bacteria mentioned-earlier was propionate (Ma et al. 2020). Our results showed that YC supplementation could increase the ruminal propionate content through regulating the bacterial composition. In the rumen, the important butyrate-producing bacteria are Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens strains, and the typical characteristic of bacteria belonging to genus Butyrivibrio is to produce butyrate (Ma et al. 2022). Improvement in Butyrivibrio relative abundance when supplemented with yeast product was reported in previous research (Xiao et al. 2016). Our experiment also found that fermentation substrate supplemented with YC increased Butyrivibrio relative abundance, which was beneficial for producing butyrate. Additionally, YC treatments decreased the relative abundance of unclassified Clostridiales. In general, Clostridiales is less abundant in the rumen, but it can be transformed into pathogenic bacteria under high acid environment (Mahoney-Kurpe et al. 2021), which has negative influence on animal’s health. The mannan oligosaccharide, a ingredient of YC, can inhibit the growth of Clostridiales (Wang et al. 2023). Thus, the decreased unclassified Clostridiales abundance might improve the production performance of sheep.

In addition to bacterial community, the fungi are also important components of ruminal microorganism. Ruminal fungus can fully degrade plant fiber, because it can penetrate and break the plant cell wall tissue as well as secreting a variety of cellulose degrading enzymes (Yang et al. 2023). Hence, the ruminal fungus can decompose some lignified fibrous materials which cannot be utilized by cellulose-degrading bacteria. Supplementation of YC in fermentation substrate significantly increased the Chao1 and Shannon indexes. The acid environment caused by high concentrate feeding might be unfavorable for growth and reproduction of ruminal fungi. Our finding proved that YC increased the richness and diversity of ruminal fungi. Previously, a study found that high concentrate feeding obviously reduced the relative abundances of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota in the rumen of dairy cows (Xue et al. 2018). Appropriate supplementation of YC up-regulated the relative abundances of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota in incubated ruminal fluid, which indicated that the amount of YC consumed could alter the fungal species and YC could attenuate SARA to some extent.

The Aspergillus plays an important role in the degradation of cellulose as well as promoting rumen fermentation. In dairy cows suffered from SARA, the relative abundance of Aspergillus was reduced (Li 2022). An in vitro experiment found that Aspergillus oryzae culture can regulate the ruminal bacterial community to relieve the SARA (Guo et al. 2022). In the current study, YC treatments significantly up-regulated the relative abundance of Aspergillus, which could be attributed to that the YC contained oligosaccharide and contributed to the growth of Aspergillus. On the contrary, the YC2 group displayed reduced Apiotrichum relative abundance when compared to CON group. The Apiotrichum has lipolytic activity (Burgstaller et al. 2023), and the decreased Apiotrichum relative abundance may protect lipid from degradation in the rumen and can be used in the small intestine. Furthermore, obvious differences of unclassified_p__Ascomycota, Microascus, Ascochyta, Vishniacozyma, Neosetophoma and Sterigmatomyces relative abundances were observed among different treatments. The main function of these fungi is to degrade dietary fiber and produce absorbable compounds for host ruminants (Bhagat et al. 2023). Due to the lower crude fiber in the fermentation substrate, less substrates were supplied for the growth of fungi, thus resulting in the reduced abundance of ruminal fungi in CON group. Nevertheless, these fungal abundances were elevated after YC interventions which suggested that YC supplementation promoted the proliferation and metabolism of fungi in incubated ruminal fluid. YC might accelerate the reaction of pyruvate generating into acetyl-CoA and promote the pyruvate utilization, which produced more ATP to maintain the proliferation of ruminal fungi, but the specific reason requires further investigation. In the future, more studies should be conducted to explore the functions of these microorganisms by metagenomics or culturomics and their response to YC under high concentrate diet condition.

In conclusion, the results from the current study demonstrated that fermentation substrate supplemented with YC (1%) decreased ruminal fluid NH3-N and lactate concentrations, whereas increased MCP, propionate and butyrate contents as well as ruminal fluid pH. The gas production of incubated ruminal fluid was increased after YC supplementation. Additionally, YC supplementation regulated the microbial composition, in which the relative abundances of Butyrivibrio, Megasphaera elsdenii, Prevotella, Succiniclasticum, Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 and Aspergillus were significantly up-regulated, and the relative abundances of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001, Streptococcus bovis, unclassified Clostridiales, Apiotrichum and Neosetophoma were significantly down-regulated. Therefore, according to our findings, the appropriate supplementation of YC in high concentrate substrate can improve ruminal fermentation and regulate microbial composition of incubated ruminal fluid.

Data availability

The raw sequencing data from the current study have been deposited in the NCBI database with the accession number PRJNA1054314.

References

  • Bai S, Cao ZJ, Cao BB, Yang HJ, Li SL, Liu JX (2018) Effects of different forage combinations in total mixed rations on in vitro gas production kinetics, ruminal and milk fatty acid profifiles of lactating cows. Anim Sci J 89:1261–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat NR, Kumar S, Kumari R, Bharti VK (2023) A review on rumen anaerobic fungi: current understanding on carbohydrate fermentation and roughages digestion in ruminants. Appl Biochem Microbiol 59:231–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick GA, Kang JH (1980) Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 63:64–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgstaller L, Oliver L, Dietrich T, Neureiter M (2023) Pilot scale production of single cell oil by Apiotrichum brassicae and Pichia kudriavzevii from acetic acid and propionic acid. Appl Sci 13:4674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cagliari AR, Magnani E, Rigon F, Loregian KE, Casagrande AC, Amâncio BR, da Silva BJ, Santos VL, Marcondes MI, Paula EM, Benedeti PDB, Branco RH (2023) Evaluation of yeast-based additives, as an alternative to ionophores, on rumen fermentation of ruminant diets using an in vitro gas production system. Front Anim Sci 4:1233273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinelli NA, Halfen J, Trevisi E, Chapman JD, Sharman ED, Anderson JL, Osorio JS (2021) Effects of peripartal yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance, blood biomarkers, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacteria species in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 104:10727–10743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dai D, Liu Y, Kong F, Guo C, Dong C, Xu X, Li S, Wang W (2023) Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture’s dose–response effects on ruminal nutrient digestibility and microbial community: an in vitro study. Fermentation 9:411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C, Sauvant D (2009) Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. J Dairy Sci 92:1620–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dias ALG, Freitas JA, Micai B, Azevedo RA, Greco LF, Santos JEP (2018) Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 101:201–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Erdman RA (1988) Dietary buffering requirements of the lactating dairy cow: a review. J Dairy Sci 71:3246–3266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenta MD, Gebremariam AA, Mebratu AS (2023) Effectiveness of probiotic and combinations of probiotic with prebiotics and probiotic with rumenotorics in experimentally induced ruminal acidosis sheep. Vet Med Res Rep 14:63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukumori R, Doi K, Mochizuki T, Oikawa S, Gondaira S, Iwasaki T, Izumi K (2022) Sodium butyrate administration modulates the ruminal villus height, inflammation-related gene expression, and plasma hormones concentration in dry cows fed a high-fiber diet. Anim Sci J 93:e13791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao K, Geng C (2022) Alterations in the rumen bacterial communities and metabolites of finishing bulls fed high-concentrate diets supplemented with active dry yeast and yeast culture. Front Microbiol 13:908244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory CJ, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R (2010) PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26:266–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot JCJ, Cone JW, Williams BA, Debersaques FMA, Lantinga EA (1996) Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 64:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Guo T, Guo L, Li F, Li F, Ma Z (2022) Rumen bacteria abundance and fermentation profile during subacute ruminal acidosis and its modulation by aspergillus oryzae culture in RUSITEC system. Fermentation 8:329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halfen J, Carpinelli N, Del Pino FAB, Chapman JD, Sharman ED, Anderson JL, Osorio JS (2021) Effects of yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance and rumen fermentation profile and microbial abundance in mid-lactation holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 104:11580–11592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Ma C, Zhang F, Wang X (2023) Effects of condensed tannins on bacterial and fungal communities during aerobic exposure of sainfoin silage. Plants 12:2967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li S (2022) Effect of rumen microbiota in the susceptibility of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Dissertation, Jilin University

  • Li S, Yoon I, Scott M, Khafipour E, Plaizier JC (2016) Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product and subacute ruminal acidosis on production, inflammation, and fermentation in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 211:50–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu G, Li Y, Mao K, Zang Y, Zhao X, Qiu Q, Qu M, Quyang K (2022) Effects of Rumen-protected creatine pyruvate on meat quality, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and muscle energy metabolism of long-distance transported beef cattle. Front Anim Sci 3:904503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Kong L, Ren S, Aschenbach JR, Shen H (2023) Acid tolerance of lactate-utilizing bacteria of the order Bacteroidales contributes to prevention of ruminal acidosis in goats adapted to a high-concentrate diet. Anim Nutr 14:130–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Yu X, Hu R, Wang X, Cao G, Zou H, Shah AM, Peng Q, Xue B, Wang L, Zhao S, Kong X (2020) Comparing the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts between growth-retarded and normal yaks on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front Microbiol 11:600516

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Shah AM, Wang Z, Fan X (2021) Potential protective effects of thiamine supplementation on the ruminal epithelium damage during subacute ruminal acidosis. Anim Sci J 92:e13579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Chen X, Khan MZ, Xiao J, Cao Z (2022) A combination of novel microecological agents and molasses role in digestibility and fermentation of rice straw by facilitating the ruminal microbial colonization. Front Microbiol 13:948049

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney-Kurpe SC, Palevich N, Noel SJ, Kumar S, Gagic D, Biggs PJ, Janssen PH, Attwood GT, Moon CD (2021) Complete genome sequences of three Clostridiales R-7 group strains isolated from the bovine rumen in New Zealand. Microbiol Resour Ann 10:e0031021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkar HPS, Sharma OP, Dawra RK, Negi SS (1982) Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor. J Dairy Sci 65:2170–2173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe MS, Cormican P, Keogh K, O’Connor A, O’Hara E, Palladino RA, Kenny DA, Waters SM (2015) Illumina MiSeq phylogenetic amplicon sequencing shows a large reduction of an uncharacterised succinivibrionaceae and an increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii clade in feed restricted cattle. PLoS ONE 10:e0133234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W (1979) The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agr Sci 93:217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olagaray KE, Sivinski SE, Saylor BA, Mamedova LK, Sauls-Hiesterman JA, Yoon I, Bradford BJ (2019) Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on feed intake parameters, lactation performance, and metabolism of transition dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 102:8092–8107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco RDL, Souza JM, Marino CT, Bastos JPST, Martins CL, Rodrigues PHM, Arrigoni MDB, Millen DD (2023) Ruminal fermentation pattern of acidosis-induced cows fed either monensin or polyclonal antibodies preparation against several ruminal bacteria. Front Vet Sci 10:1090107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R Language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin NR, Whon TW, Bae JW (2015) Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol 33:496–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steele MA, Croom J, Kahler M, AlZahal O, Hook SE, Plaizier K, McBride BW (2011) Bovine rumen epithelium undergoes rapid structural adaptations during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis. Am J Physiol-reg I 300:R1515–R1523

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Wang Q, Yang Z, Xie T, Wang Z, Li S, Wang W (2022) Altering methane emission, fatty acid composition, and microbial profile during in vitro ruminant fermentation by manipulating dietary fatty acid ratios. Fermentation 8:310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong Y, Wu J, Guo W, Yang Z, Wang H, Liu H, Gao Y, Sun M, Yue C (2023) The effect of combining millet and corn straw as source forage for beef cattle diets on ruminal degradability and fungal community. Animals 13:548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tunkala BZ, DiGiacomo K, Alvarez Hess PS, Gardiner CP, Suleria H, Leury BJ, Dunshea FR (2023) Evaluation of legumes for fermentability and protein fractions using in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 305:115777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vahmani P, Ponnampalam EN, Kraft J, Mapiye C, Bermingham EN, Watkins PJ, Proctor SD, Dugan MER (2020) Bioactivity and health effects of ruminant meat lipids. Invited Rev Meat Sci 165:108114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas D, Beauchemin KA, Koenig KM (2015) Using organic acids to control subacute ruminal acidosis and fermentation in feedlot cattle fed a high-grain diet. J Anim Sci 93:3950–3958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhao G, Zhuang Y, Chai J, Zhang N (2022a) Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture promotes the performance of fattening sheep by enhancing nutrients digestibility and rumen development. Fermentation 8:719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Hao Y, Luo C, Wang Q, Wang Z, Li D, Yuan J, Cao Z, Yang H, Li S (2022b) Effects of different additives on the chemical composition, fermentation profile, in vitro and in situ digestibility of paper mulberry silage. Fermentation 8:435

  • Wang X, Li F, Zhang N, Ungerfeld E, Guo L, Zhang X, Wang M, Ma Z (2023) Effects of supplementing a yeast culture in a pelleted total mixed ration on fiber degradation, fermentation parameters, and the bacterial community in the rumen of sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 296:115565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao JX, Alugongo GM, Chung R, Dong SZ, Li SL, Yoon I, Wu ZH, Cao ZJ (2016) Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on dairy calves: ruminal fermentation, gastrointestinal morphology, and microbial community. J Dairy Sci 99:5401–5412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Jiao C, Diao Q, Tu Y (2023) Preweaning period is a critical window for rumen microbial regulation of average daily gain in Holstein heifer calves. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 14:128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xue F, Nan X, Sun F, Pan X, Guo Y, Jiang L, Xiong B (2018) Metagenome sequencing to analyze the impacts of thiamine supplementation on ruminal fungi in dairy cows fed high-concentrate diets. AMB Express 8:159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Datsomor O, Jiang M, Ma X, Zhao G, Zhan K (2022a) Protective roles of sodium butyrate in lipopolysaccharide-induced bovine ruminal epithelial cells by activating G protein-coupled receptors 41. Front Nutr 9:842634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Liu S, Xie T, Wang Q, Wang Z, Yang H, Li S, Wang W (2022b) Effect of unsaturated fatty acid ratio in vitro on rumen fermentation, methane concentration, and microbial profile. Fermentation 8:540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Zhang G, Yuan Z, He S, Wang R, Zheng J, Mao H, Chai J, Wu D (2023) Exploring the temporal dynamics of rumen bacterial and fungal communities in yaks (Bos grunniens) from 5 days after birth to adulthood by full-length 16S and 18S rRNA sequencing. Front Vet Sci 10:1166015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zaworski EM, Shriver-Munsch CM, Fadden NA, Sanchez WK, Yoon I, Bobe G (2014) Effects of feeding various dosages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 97:3081–3098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DF, Yang HJ (2011) In vitro ruminal methanogenesis of a hay-rich substrate in response to different combination supplements of nitrocompounds; pyromellitic diimide and 2-bromoethanesulphonate. Anim Feed Sci Technol 163:20–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XM, Wang M, Yu Q, Ma ZY, Beauchemin KA, Wang R, Wen JN, Lukuyu BA, Tan ZL (2020) Liquid hot water treatment of rice straw enhances anaerobic degradation and inhibits methane production during in vitro ruminal fermentation. J Dairy Sci 103:4252–4261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Liang H, Xu L, Zou B, Zhang T, Xue F, Qu M (2022) Rumen fermentative metabolomic and blood insights into the effect of yeast culture supplement on growing bulls under heat stress conditions. Front Microbiol 13:947822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Ren W, Bi Y, Zhang J, Cheng Y, Xu X (2023) Effects of different feeding patterns on the rumen bacterial community of tan lambs, based on high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. Front Microbiol 14:1228935

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Breeding of High-Performance Meat Sheep in Major Program (JD) of Hubei Province (2023BAA029), Germplasm innovation project of prolificacy sheep in Xinjiang agricultural region (2023A02004-1), Scientific and technological innovation 2030 - major agricultural biological breeding project (2022ZD0401403), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-38), Tianchi Talent and Tianshan Talent Distinguished Expert (2023-25).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, HW and XJ; methodology, HW, GL, AZ and BL; software, HY and UF; validation, HW, HY and XJ; formal analysis, HY, KK, SA and YD; investigation, HZ, GL, AZ, SA, BL, UF, FH, CW, XB, YC and YD; resources, KK, FH, CW, XB and YC; data curation, HW and XJ; writing—original draft preparation, HW; writing—review and editing, HW, SA, UF and XJ; visualization, HW, SA and UF; supervision, HY, YC and XJ; project administration, XJ; funding acquisition, XJ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xunping Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving animal care and management used in this experiment were authorized by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, Hubei, China; Approval Code: HZAUGO-2019-008).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Liu, G., Zhou, A. et al. Effects of yeast culture on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial community of high concentrate diet in sheep. AMB Expr 14, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01692-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01692-6

Keywords