Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Enterobacter cloacae from urinary tract infections: frequency, protein analysis, and antimicrobial resistance

Abstract

The genus Enterobacter belongs to the ESKAPE group, which includes Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. This group is characterized by the development of resistance to various antibiotics. In recent years, Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) has emerged as a clinically important pathogen responsible for a wide range of healthcare-associated illnesses. Identifying Enterobacter species can be challenging due to their similar phenotypic characteristics. The emergence of multidrug-resistant E. cloacae is also a significant problem in healthcare settings. Therefore, our study aimed to identify and differentiate E. cloacae using Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) as a fast and precise proteomic analytical technique. We also tested hospital-acquired E. cloacae isolates that produce Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) against commonly used antibiotics for treating urinary tract infections (UTIs). We used a total of 189 E. cloacae isolates from 2300 urine samples of patients with UTIs in our investigation. We employed culturing techniques, as well as the BD Phoenix™ automated identification system (Becton, Dickinson) and Analytical Profile Index (API) system for the biochemical identification of E. cloacae isolates. We used the MALDI Biotyper (MBT) device for peptide mass fingerprinting analysis of all isolates. We utilized the single peak intensities and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) created by MBT Compass software to discriminate and cluster the E. cloacae isolates. Additionally, we evaluated the sensitivity and resistance of ESBL-E. cloacae isolates using the Kirby Bauer method. Out of the 189 E. cloacae isolates, the BD Phoenix system correctly identified 180 (95.24%) isolates, while the API system correctly identified 165 (87.30%) isolates. However, the MBT accurately identified 185 (98.95%) isolates with a score of 2.00 or higher. PCA positively discriminated the identified E. cloacae isolates into one group, and prominent peaks were noticed between 4230 mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and 8500 m/z. The ESBL-E. cloacae isolates exhibited a higher degree of resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalothin, cefuroxime, and cefoxitin. Several isolates were susceptible to carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem, and ertapenem); however, potential future resistance against carbapenems should be taken into consideration. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF MS is a powerful and precise technology that can be routinely used to recognize and differentiate various pathogens in clinical samples. Additionally, the growing antimicrobial resistance of this bacterium may pose a significant risk to human health.

Introduction

Globally, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the major and expensive healthcare problems worldwide due to their high frequency, treatment challenges, and negative consequences (Öztürk and Murt 2020; Dehkordi et al. 2022; Mekonnen et al. 2023). They can impact individuals of all ages, from children to adults. The structure of the female genital system, specifically the close proximity of the urine meatus to the anus, makes women more susceptible to UTIs compared to men (John et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2023). Approximately 250 million people are affected by UTIs every year, accounting for roughly 40% of all infections worldwide and resulting in a global economic burden exceeding $6 billion (Tan and Chlebicki 2016; Delcaru et al. 2017; Gajdács and Urbán, 2019). UTIs are associated with a significant burden of mortality and a wide range of clinical signs, from asymptomatic bacteriuria to cystitis or septic shock, which may result in dangerous multi-organ dysfunction (Agarwal et al. 2012; Singh et al. 2017; Ratajczak et al. 2022).

The Enterobacter species belong to the Enterobacteriaceae family, which is a group of gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacteria. As a member of the human alimentary tract's commensal flora, these bacteria are also classified as plant, insect, and human pathogens (Mezzatesta et al. 2012). A wide variety of Enterobacter spp. can be found throughout the world and can be collected from outdoor environments, animals, and healthcare settings (Davin-Regli et al. 2019; Ganbold et al. 2023; Ortiz-Díez et al. 2023). As one of the ESKAPE groups of bacteria, Enterobacter spp. play a significant role in poorer health outcomes and increased therapy costs (De Oliveira et al. 2020; Catalano et al. 2023). These bacteria are responsible for a variety of nosocomial and community-acquired illnesses, including infections of the urinary system, lungs, and soft tissues (Patel and Patel 2016; Davin-Regli et al. 2019; Anju et al. 2020). Various types of microorganisms are responsible for most UTIs, with Enterobacteriaceae being the most prevalent (Pardeshi 2018; Azar et al. 2023; Mancuso et al. 2023b). The most prevalent Enterobacteriaceae are Escherichia coli, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. cloacae (Toner et al. 2016; Takei et al. 2023).

There is a clinical significance associated with the E. cloacae complex group (Candela et al. 2023). According to the sequencing of the Heat Shock Protein 60 (hsp60) genome, this group consists of 13 diverse genetic clusters. However, the classification of this genus is still in question (Hoffmann and Roggenkamp 2003; Davin-Regli et al. 2019). By using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data gathered from isolates of the E. cloacae complex, the species identified by hsp60 sequencing (5) were reorganized into distinct classes (Sutton et al. 2018) and new species of the E. cloacae complex were discovered (Wu et al. 2019). Most E. cloacae complex species are distinguished using sequence-based approaches. The hsp60 gene is commonly used, but WGS and multilocus sequence typing are also utilized (Hoffmann and Roggenkamp 2003; Singh et al. 2018). Sequence-based testing techniques require a significant amount of time and specialized equipment to be successful. Several new approaches, such as MALDI-TOF MS, are being developed to replace sequence-based methods. The MALDI-TOF MS method has been successfully revealed as a influential technique for identifying bacteria (Elbehiry et al. 2017, 2019b, 2021, 2022a, 2022b, 2023; Al-Beloushi et al. 2018; Abalkhail and Elbehiry 2022). It can recognize E. cloacae complex isolates at the species level, but its differentiation ability for these species is limited when conventional methods are conducted and commercially available databases with poor determination are used (Pavlovic et al. 2012; De Florio et al. 2018).

Another significant issue of concern within the E. cloacae complex is antibiotic resistance, which is a consequence of the incorrect and inappropriate use of antibiotics (Intra et al. 2023). The E. cloacae complex belongs to the ESKAPE group, which is identified as the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections. In recognition of this, the World Health Organization has added Enterobacter spp. to the list of priority bacteria for the development of novel antibiotics (Davin-Regli et al. 2019; Intra et al. 2023). Many types of Enterobacter spp. have developed resistance to ampicillin and wide-spectrum cephalosporins, as well as other antimicrobial drugs such as third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems, due to the acquisition of genetic mobile elements. This has made treatment difficult (Annavajhala et al. 2019; Davin-Regli et al. 2019; Quraishi et al. 2019).

Furthermore, E. cloacae is inherently resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, and cephalosporins, regardless of whether it produces the AmpC-lactamase enzyme. Cephalosporins, which are broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs, are highly susceptible to enzymatic resistance (Zahra et al. 2021; Rabaan et al. 2022). Excessive production of AmpC-lactamase often leads to resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. Treatment with cephalosporins can result in the overproduction of AmpC mutants (Cairns et al. 2021). Fourth-generation cephalosporins have limited effectiveness against de-repressed bacteria, but in the presence of ESBL-producing strains, the bacteria can develop resistance to the aforementioned antimicrobials (Ahmed et al. 2022). However, there is currently no vaccine available to protect against E. cloacae infections, highlighting the need for the development of a highly effective vaccine to combat these bacterial infections (Ioannou et al. 2022).

Several research studies (Ali et al. 2016; Neupane et al. 2016) have found an increase in antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae strains from UTIs to commonly prescribed antibiotics like ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Both European and African investigations have stated a significant rise in Gram-negative bacteria associated with Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing UTIs (Barguigua et al. 2013; Hammami et al. 2013). The rise of ESBL-generating microorganisms has made empirical therapy of diseases more challenging and has also led to increased resistance to beta-lactams such as penicillin and cephalosporins, and in some cases, carbapenems (Paterson and Bonomo 2005). There is a strong relationship between the development of antibiotic resistance in Enterobacter spp. and higher mortality rates, prolonged hospital stays, and higher medical expenditures for those infected (Davin-Regli et al. 2019). There have been a few articles published about the resistance of Enterobacter spp. to antibiotics (Wang et al. 2017; Jiménez-Guerra et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021).

Based on the previously mentioned data, it is crucial to rapidly identify and differentiate E. cloacae in order to address the issue of phenotypic similarity among E. cloacae complex species. Furthermore, it is necessary to analyze the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of E. cloacae in healthcare-associated infections to determine the degree of tolerance and choice the most suitable antibiotic treatment for UTIs. In Saudi Arabia, there has been limited research on the characteristics of ESBL-E. cloacae and its antibiotic resistance, so conducting such an investigation could be beneficial for clinicians when choosing an appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy. Therefore, this study focused on utilizing MALDI-TOF MS for proteomic identification and differentiation of E. cloacae isolates obtained from UTI patients. Additionally, antibiotic resistance profiles were conducted to identify the most effective antibiotics for therapy.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

Since there were no human participants in this study, ethical approval or written authorization was not required. We only used archived bacterial cultures obtained from routine medical tests. Prior to accessing any data, all cultures were completely anonymized.

An overview of the study's design and data collection

During January to December 2020, the Microbiology Laboratory at King Fahd Medical City conducted a randomized exploratory investigation. The study focused on isolating all E. cloacae isolates from urine specimens. The microbiology laboratory within the hospital provided information on sample collection and bacterial isolation, and the authors did not directly contact the patients for this study. To gather patient information, the clinical microbiology laboratory used its service management program. Following standard laboratory procedures, the clinical samples of the patients were collected and analyzed. Each patient's midstream urine sample was collected and placed in sterile plastic containers. Using a disposable plastic loop, the specimens were streaked on blood agar and MacConkey agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Initially, a preliminary reading was taken, and then the specimen was further incubated for a final reading. There were three categories of final culture reports: pure, mixed, and no growth. If two organisms were present, they were considered mixed, and in most cases, we couldn’t identify them precisely. For the pure cultures, species and colony-forming units per milliliter were used for further classification. For a urine specimen to be considered to have significant monomicrobic bacteriuria (urine bag), it needed to contain more than 105 CFU/mL of a specific microbial species. Patients with multimicrobic bacteriuria or whose urine samples were taken more than three days after admission were excluded from the study.

In total, 2300 urine samples were included in this study. To ensure accurate estimation of resistance levels, only the first isolate of E. cloacae from each participant was used. The isolates were classified based on whether they came from outpatient care or from a hospital setting. Outpatient samples were collected from the hospital's outpatient sections and from physicians in the surrounding community. Hospitalized patients were sampled from the hospital’s emergency room and various hospital units. The collected samples were recorded and submitted to the microbiology lab for additional testing, following contemporary European regulations. If the specimens could not be examined immediately, they were chilled at 4 to 6 °C (Cornaglia et al. 2020).

Culturing technique

In accordance with the guidelines on routine culture media from the World Health Organization, all urine samples were cultured using a semiquantitative method (Vandepitte 2003). To isolate E. cloacae bacteria, one mL of each urine sample was plated on nutritional agar, tryptose soya agar, and two differential selective media, including Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate agar (XLD) and Salmonella Shigella agar (SS). The culture plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. The presence of E. cloacae was determined by observing the appearance of rough and smooth colonies on tryptose-soya agar. In this study, biochemical assays and cultural features were utilized to identify and classify the bacteria, utilizing the BD Phoenix™ automated identification system (BD—Mississauga, Canada) and Analytical profile index (API) system (bioMerieux UK Ltd, Basingstoke, UK).

BD Phoenix System-based biochemical identification of E. cloacae isolates

Various types of Gram-negative bacteria were tested using the NMIC/ID-4 panel of the Phoenix system. To prepare the McFarland 0.5 stock solution, 4.5 mL of Phoenix ID broth was used based on the SensititreTM Nephelometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) (Carroll et al. 2006). The obtained bacterial ID solution was then filled into the ID field of the Phoenix panel. A 50 µL solution of bacterial solution was added to each of the chemical reactivity wells on the panel. Any excess suspension was absorbed by the cushion beneath the panels. Once the panel was coated with a rubberized coating and the display code was scanned, it was immediately inserted into the Phoenix machine. To compare results, the ID results of E. cloacae isolates from urine samples using the Phoenix system were compared with those of the old API system.

The identification of E. cloacae by MALDI Biotyper (MBT)

According to Lartigue (2013), the MBT was used to identify 186 isolates of E. cloacae from various urine samples. The ethanol-formic acid-acetonitrile extraction scheme developed by Bruker Daltonics in Bremen, Germany was used for this purpose. The isolates were streaked on nutrient agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Saudi Arabia) and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. To minimize randomization, two duplicates of a fresh colony from each isolate were injected onto the MBT 96 target plate. A 1 µL matrix solution consisting of saturated -Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), 50% acetonitrile (MeCN), and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was mixed with the colony. The Compass software installed in the MBT device was used to identify unknown bacteria (see Table 1).

Table 1 An analysis of key factor indicators in urine E. cloacae isolates from January to December 2020

An electric field of 20 kV was used to propel ions in a positive ion mode. Ions with masses greater than 1000 Da could be extracted using the pulse extraction procedure. Spectra were automatically gathered and compared to those of reference strains of E. cloacae using the Compass software and Flex control of laser intensity. A spectrum analysis was then performed. Logarithmic scores were calculated by comparing unknown spectra to spectra in the database used as references. A score of 2.0 or higher indicates reliable species identification, while scores ranging from 1.9 to 1.7 are acceptable for genus identification. The MBT spectra were grouped based on correlated distances between them using the Main Spectrum Profile (MSP) dendrogram. The clusters were divided and examined using distance levels of 100, 180, and 500. Escherichia coli (E. coli) positive control was used as a bacterial test standard during the investigation.

Antimicrobial resistance of E. cloacae isolates using the Kirby-Bauer test

A Kirby Bauer test was used to evaluate the susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics of all isolates of E. cloacae that had been identified according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidlines for version 6.0 of their guidelines (Kosikowska et al. 2020). An evaluation of 22 antimicrobial agents against E. cloacae was conducted (Table 2). An experimental analysis was conducted, and the results are presented as Susceptible/Intermediate/Resistant according to CLSI’s indicated diameters or breakpoints (Kosikowska et al. 2020). Once an isolate is found to be resistant to three different classes of antibiotics, it is classified as multidrug-resistant.

Table 2 The antibiotic resistance and susceptibility profiles of ESBL E. cloace isolates from urine of patients suffering from UTIs

Disc susceptibility test for detection of ESBL-E. cloacae

The ESBL-E. cloacae was detected in all strains using three cephalosporin markers: cefpodoxime (30 g), ceftazidime (30 g), and cefotaxime (30 g). A resistant isolate was identified as one with a zone diameter of 17 mm, 22 mm, and 27 mm for each of the three markers, respectively. A phenotypic confirmation test was performed on isolates that showed resistance to at least one of the three cephalosporins (New 2007).

Double-disk synergy test (DDST) for ESBL producing E. cloacae

Enterobacter cloacae isolates tested by DDST proved to be tolerant to all three antimicrobial agents used for ESBL development. The ESBLs were identified using cefpodoxime (30 g), ceftazidime (30 g), cefotaxime (30 g), and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20 g amoxicillin + 10 g clavulanic acid). Discs of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20 g/10 g) and third-generation cephalosporin were placed 20 mm apart on Muller-Hinton agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Saudi Arabia) plates. The plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. ESBL findings were considered positive if the cephalosporin inhibition zone increased towards the amoxicillin/clavulanic acid disc. DSM 30054 E. cloacae subsp. cloacae and DSM 498—E. coli were used as positive controls.

Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index determination

MAR index is an evaluation method for measuring the possible dangers and testing for multidrug-resistant microorganisms. In this experiment, 21 antimicrobial agents were tested, which are indicated by the letter (b). As stated by Osundiya et al. (2013), The MAR index is calculated by dividing the number of antimicrobial agents to which the isolate conferred resistance (a) by the total number of antimicrobial agents utilized (b).

Analysis of statistical data

Data was analyzed using SPSS Software 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Biochemical identification of Enterobacter cloacae isolates

After examining 2300 urine samples, 189 isolates of E. cloacae were identified using a culture and staining procedure. Out of all the isolates, the BD Phoenix System accurately identified 180 (95.24%) isolates, while misidentifying nine (4.76%) isolates. On the other hand, the API system correctly identified 165 (87.30%) out of the total isolates.

Proteome identification of Enterobacter cloacae

A total of 189 isolates of E. cloacae were analyzed using the MBT automated machinery. The Compass software’s Bruker library was used to compare the acquired spectra, and 185 out of 189 (97.88%) were correctly detected. According to the results, 98 isolates (51.95%) had scores between 2.30 and 3.00, while 82 isolates (43.38%) had scores between 2.00 and 2.29. The genus level identification included five isolates with scores ranging from 1.7 to 1.99. The remaining four isolates were identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae. A recent gel photograph depicted the distinct spectra of each isolate of E. cloacae. In Fig. 1A, multiple spectra were recorded ranging from 3500 m/z to 10,500 m/z, but the prominent peaks were found between 4230 m/z and 8500 m/z. Our study found that the spectral protein profiles of reference strains from the MBT collection matched the gel views of protein for isolates of E. cloacae from urine samples (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Analysis of the spectral profile of one E. cloacae isolated from urine samples, compared to the profile of E. cloacae 13159_CHB, a reference strain in the MBT library. The deposited spectrum is shown in blue in the lower half of the spectra, while the green spectrum in the top part reveals prominent matching peaks. Mismatched peaks are shown in red, and intermediate peaks are shown in yellow. The concentrations of peaks observed in line spectra range from 3500 to 10,500 m/z, with prominent peaks occurring between 4230 and 8500 m/z. B Gel profiles constructed from various protein spectra of various E. cloacae isolates

Additionally, we utilized the PCA feature of the MBT Compass software to evaluate the variation and similarity of protein spectra. As shown in Fig. 2A, the identified isolates exhibited a wide range of spectral signals associated with their proteins. Each peak was determined by employing three loading values. These loading values were calculated based on the three principal component equations (PC1, PC2, and PC3). The PCA tool was employed in our analysis to examine all observed peaks in the MBT database. According to the 3D PCA, all isolates of E. cloacae were clustered together. An analysis of the PCA revealed that PC1, PC2, and PC3 had reciprocal impacts on the development of a specific characteristic, accounting for nearly 26%, 18%, and 13% (Fig. 2B), correspondingly.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A The PCA image displays a three-dimensional image of the field E cloacae isolates. B PC plots demonstrate the influence of ten main components on profile categorization. The first three components (PC1, PC2, and PC3) contributed approximately 26%, 18%, and 13% respectively

According to our results, the MSP-based dendrogram showed clear relationships between the six reference strains in the reference library and the tested E. cloacae isolates. A total of 189 clinical isolates of E. cloacae were matched to the following strains used as references in the study: 65 isolates with E. cloacae 13159_CHB, 55 isolates with E. cloacae ssp cloacae DSM 30054T HAM, 33 isolates with E. cloacae 20105_2 CHB, 17 isolates with E. cloacae MB 8779 05 THL, 12 isolates with E. cloacae DSM 3264 BRB, and 7 strains were found to be matched with E. cloacae DSM 3060 DSM.

Frequency of ESBL and non-ESBL E. cloacae

During the investigation, 2300 urine samples that met the eligibility requirements were collected from patients with UTIs in both outpatient and inpatient settings at King Fahd Medical City. Out of these specimens, 189 (8.21%) contained E. cloacae isolates from patients with nonrepetitive UTIs. Among these, 82 (43.39%) contained ESBL-E. cloacae and 107 (56.61%) contained non-ESBL-E. cloacae. When looking at gender, female patients with ESBL-E. cloacae accounted for 53.66% while male patients accounted for 46.34%. For non-ESBL-E. cloacae, female patients accounted for 55.14% and male patients accounted for 46.6%. These findings suggest that the spectrum of E. cloacae differs significantly between male and female UTI patients, with females being more likely to develop the infection. In terms of age, patients aged 0–10 years had the highest percentage (24.87%) of both ESBL and non-ESBL E. cloacae. This was followed by patients aged 41–50 years (19.05%), 61–70 years (16.40%), 51–60 years (14.81%), and 71–80 years (12.70%).

The degree of resistance and susceptibility of ESBL E. cloacae to various antibiotic classes

Our analysis of the data in Table 2 included six classes of 21 antimicrobial agents. All isolates of ESBL-E. cloacae in this study were resistant to ampicillin (100%), amoxicillin–clavulanate (100%), cephalothin (100%), cefroxime (100%), and cefoxitin (97.56%) (Fig. 3). Amikacin was highly effective against ESBL-E. cloacae (100%), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, and levofloxacin (96.34%) (Fig. 3). Moreover, 76% to 92% of the E. cloacae strains were susceptible to cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin, tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, and aztreonam. During our investigation, we observed an increase in antimicrobial resistance among strains of E. cloacae to the use of traditional antibiotics, which highlights the need for surveillance programs to monitor antimicrobial resistance.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility patterns of 82 ESBL E. cloacae strains

Most of the ESBL-E. cloacae strains were resistant to at least three of the drugs tested. Table 3 shows the calculation of the MAR index for the 82 ESBL-E cloacae isolates in UTIs. Overall, ESBL-E. cloacae strains had an average MAR index of 0.37. Based on MAR scores of 0.67, the majority of E. cloacae isolates showed multidrug resistance to AMP, AMC, USAN, CXM, CAZ, FOX, FEP, CTX, CIP, GEN, SXT, TZP, IPM, TGC, and ATM. In contrast, E. cloacae strains had the lowest MAR index of 0.19. There were several strains with a MAR index exceeding 0.20. Consequently, most ESBL-E. cloacae strains were highly resistant to a wide range of antimicrobial drugs commonly used to treat UTIs, leading to high MAR index values.

Table 3 Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index of ESBL-E. clacae isolated from urine samples

Discussion

Today, with the rise of antibiotic resistance, it is crucial to have a thorough understanding of microbial ecology (Andersson et al. 2020; Selvarajan et al. 2022). In recent years, the environment has been identified as both an incubator and a means of resistance propagation. This includes considering both environmental bacteria and the various types of microorganisms present in the human body (Martinez 2009; De Florio et al. 2018). Due to the selection pressure exerted in different environments, microorganisms are adapting and evolving resistance rapidly (Roemhild et al. 2018; Nguyen et al. 2020). In the healthcare setting, microorganisms can quickly develop and acquire mobile genetic components that are resistant to antibiotics (Ibrahim 2023; Mancuso et al. 2023a; Salam et al. 2023). This can lead to the spread of dangerous illnesses through their propagation.

Among the Enterobacter species, E. cloacae is most commonly isolated from healthcare settings (Bennett et al. 2023; Haque et al. 2023). Identifying Enterobacter species can be challenging because multiple species have very similar phenotypical characteristics. Additionally, as a member of the ESKAPE group, Enterobacter has been found to be resistant to various antibiotic classes (Mulani et al. 2019). E. cloacae, one of the 22 recognized Enterobacter species, has been most frequently identified and investigated in hospitalized patients. According to Jain and his colleagues' findings in 2021, E. cloacae was the most commonly isolated species, accounting for over 85% of the cases, followed by E. aerogenes and E. asburiae (Jain et al. 2021). The majority of the samples from which Enterobacter species have been isolated (over 50%) are urine and wound samples. Therefore, it is crucial to use a rapid and accurate technology that can precisely identify and differentiate E. cloacae from other types of Enterobacter species (De Florio et al. 2018). With this in mind, our investigation focused on using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry technology to identify E. cloacae at the species level.

Based on our results, MALDI TOF MS was capable of identifying 185 out of 189 (97.88%) E. cloacae strains isolated from UTI patients. The mass spectrum provided by the MBT Compass Software was sufficient to identify almost all tested strains of E. cloacae at the species level. To improve the accuracy of our investigation, upgrading the Compass software could have been beneficial. De Florio et al. (2018) obtained similar results when they tested the effectiveness of MALDI platforms in identifying and clustering Enterobacter species from nosocomial environments. Their study found that MALDI TOF MS was a highly sensitive and specific technique for identifying and grouping Enterobacter species.

A study conducted by Godmer et al. (2021) utilized MALDI-TOF MS technology and two databases to identify isolates of the E. cloacae complex, instead of using the hsp60 gene sequencing technique for identification. The study's results significantly improved the identification of members of the E. cloacae complex, with only 8% of the isolates misdiagnosed at the species level. Previously, Enterobacter isolates were detected using the MBT and Vitek MS, which have recently been adopted by medical microbiological laboratories due to their speed and affordability (Angeletti 2017). Both MALDI-TOF systems were used simultaneously to identify the E. cloacae complex, and their performance was evaluated. Except for Enterobacter asburiae identification, which was only accurate using the MBT, both devices demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity.

The MALDI-TOF MS technology has benefits and drawbacks, just like any other microbial identification method (Elbehiry et al. 2016, 2022a; Haider et al. 2023). This method can detect a wide range of microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi (Biswas and Rolain 2013). However, the presence of endospores from bacteria like Bacillus species can cause spectrum disruption. To resolve this issue, it is recommended to use a 24-h culture (Clark et al. 2013). MALDI-TOF MS can identify anaerobic isolates at the species level in hospital samples, but it cannot recognize Gram-positive isolates at the species level. To address this limitation, the reference library should be updated to include reference spectra from this bacterial group in the future (Chalupová et al. 2014). MALDI-TOF has been used to assess several clinical specimens, such as milk, urine, and blood, and it has been shown to accurately detect bacteria (Greub and Prod’Hom 2011; Wilson et al. 2019). However, blood and urine samples contain a large number of bacteria, which makes this method ineffective. To overcome this barrier, various technologies are available, such as urine filtering and blood separation (Tsuchida et al. 2020).

There is a global problem associated with the emergence and spread of Enterobacteriaceae that are resistant to multiple drugs, especially those that produce ESBLs (Saravanan et al. 2018; Teklu et al. 2019; Mustafai et al. 2023). The emergence of healthcare-associated infection outbreaks caused by ESBL-producing E. cloacae and E. coli has been reported in numerous cases (Rordorf et al. 2000; Kun Chen et al. 2021). The ESBL-E. cloacae pathogen has been recognized for some time as one of the predominant pathogens causing both nosocomial and public outbreaks worldwide (De Florio et al. 2018; Jain et al. 2021; Msimango et al. 2023). The severity of these outbreaks differs by region (Shakya et al. 2017; Saipriya et al. 2018). Understanding the geographic demographics and how they have changed over time is essential for determining the appropriate first-line antibiotic therapy for different regions. Several factors, such as healthcare practices, regulations, and the healthcare system, are intertwined and contribute to a significant burden on our community as a whole (Kettani Halabi et al. 2021; Abalkhail et al. 2022).

The findings of our study show that all E. cloacae isolates displayed a high degree of resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, cephalothin, cefuroxime, and cefoxitin. Similar findings were reported by Stock et al. (2001), who explained that Enterobacter species are naturally resistant to penicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, first-generation cephalosporins, and cefoxitin due to their production of AmpC-lactamase. In a recent investigation conducted by Jain et al. (2021), E. cloacae demonstrated 100% resistance to ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Their study found that the frequency of ESBL-Enterobacter species decreased from 35% in 2017 to approximately 15% in 2020. However, beta-lactam resistance remained constant, illustrating the existence of developed mechanisms of resistance. Another challenge is that E. cloacae is capable of adapting to the healthcare environment, acquiring multiple genomic elements, and modulating the production of different proteins associated with antibiotic resistance. These factors complicate the treatment of infections caused by this bacterium (Intra et al. 2023).

Based on the observed tolerance to beta-lactam and cephalosporin antibiotics, these medications may no longer be suitable for use as therapeutic treatments (Abalkhail et al. 2022). However, our investigation indicates that most of E. cloacae isolates were susceptible to carbapenems (meropenem, ertapenem and imipenem), aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamycin), and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin). Therefore, these antimicrobial agents are suggested as suitable treatments for UTIs. The results of our study agree with those of Jimenez-Guerra et al. (2020), who determined that the vulnerability of E. cloacae strains to carbapenem (imipenem) was greater than 80%. Matsumoto and Muratani (2004), for example, claim that imipenem has excellent antibacterial activity against fresh urine isolates, such as E. cloacae. However, another study concluded that only 20% were susceptible to imipenem (Dehkordi et al. 2022). This bacterium is an opportunistic, multi-resistant pathogen capable of causing infection outbreaks at hospitals (Davin-Regli and Pagès, 2015).

Additionally, increasing the broad use of these antibiotics may help alleviate concerns about future resistance development rates (Abalkhail and Elbehiry 2022). As this matter illustrates, antibiotic resistance in uropathogenic microorganisms is a serious global health problem. A study by Hryniewicz et al. (2001) has shown that bacteria in UTIs are increasingly resistant to traditional pharmaceuticals. The susceptibility of E. cloacae strains associated with UTIs to antibiotics has significantly declined over the past few years due to epidemiological surveillance. It seems likely that the results were caused by bacteria acquiring and transmitting resistance genes via plasmids through conjugation and transformation (Dehkordi et al. 2022). Additional variables that could have contributed to significantly enhanced resistance in E. cloacae strains would include self-treatment and non-compliance with dosage (Dehkordi et al. 2022).

The economic impact of infections triggered by multidrug-resistant bacteria can be difficult to assess due to varying costs in different healthcare systems (Huebner et al. 2016; Giraldi et al. 2019; Abalkhail and Elbehiry 2022). While calculating expenditures is challenging, it is likely that this phenomenon has adverse financial effects. These effects include extended hospital stays, increased medical expenses, higher laboratory and testing costs, the need for additional measures, greater expenditures for implementing mitigation and prevention applications, and potential legal action (Giraldi et al. 2019). Given the ongoing changes in healthcare, advancements in technology, legislative systems, and the need to maximize healthcare funds, it is crucial to recognize the financial implications of illnesses produced by multidrug-resistant bacteria (Elbehiry et al. 2019a, 2022d; Bassetti and Giacobbe 2020). This understanding will enable the implementation of affordable and effective control and prevention programs. Analyzing the social and economic implications of hospital infections is increasingly important for the development of prevention and surveillance systems. The involvement of practitioners from various fields is necessary to implement effective intervention strategies (Abalkhail et al. 2022; Elbehiry et al. 2022c).

Although there are several antimicrobial therapies available for treating Enterobacter diseases, the resistance to these treatments makes these bacteria more dangerous and likely to spread (Davin-Regli and Pagès, 2015). However, no vaccination has been developed yet to prevent these bacterial infections. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an effective vaccine to combat these infections. In 2022, Naveed and his colleagues conducted a trial using immunoinformatic methodologies to develop a safe, engineered, and efficient vaccine (Naveed et al. 2022b). They studied four E. cloacae proteins to identify epitopes for the development of an mRNA vaccine that would protect against infection with E. cloacae. Immunoinformatics methods were utilized to construct the vaccine in order to stimulate cellular and humoral reactivity. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that Enterobacter is associated with epigenetic changes throughout infections (Davin-Regli and Pagès, 2015; Cairns et al. 2021). These epigenome regulatory mechanisms allow host organisms to prosper (Naveed et al. 2021, 2022a). A vaccine or treatment for this infection has been developed to address this function. Based on this theory, an increase in indigenous immune cells is a result of an increase in epigenetic modifications that affect both the immune system’s genes and “trained immunity” (Naveed et al. 2022c).

This study is likely to have a noteworthy influence on the controlling of UTIs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. However, there are several limitations to our study, particularly the fact that the research sample is limited to a specific Saudi state. According to the study, antibiotic resistance may not be widespread in other parts of the kingdom since the research was conducted only in Riyadh. To gather more information, it would be beneficial to identify a larger number of patients from different regions of Saudi Arabia who have the same medical condition. One of the challenges is the delay in administering appropriate medication due to the time required for urine testing and notification of ESBL UTIs. Severe cases of UTIs can lead to complications such as kidney damage and hypertension, as well as hinder treatment and diagnosis. Furthermore, conducting genomic identification and detailed genealogical research may offer additional insights into the distribution of ESBL-producing E. cloacae strains.

In conclusion, MALDI-TOF MS is a robust and precise mass spectrometry technology used to detect and differentiate E. cloacae in urine from patients with UTIs. This technique has multiple potential applications, including the recognition, discrimination, and determination of antimicrobial resistance in various clinical and environmental samples. It is important to note that E. cloacae isolates have shown increasing resistance to various antibiotics, such as ampicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, cephalothin, cefuroxime, and cefoxitin, with the potential for future carbapenem resistance. Using antibiotics for UTIs caused by ESBL-E. cloacae may be unnecessary, as it increases the spread of bacteria resistant to antibiotics. Additionally, multidrug-resistant bacteria can develop as a result of incorrect prescription drug use. Consequently, treating infections caused by this bacterium may become challenging, posing a significant risk to human health. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a highly effective vaccine to combat these bacterial infections.

There are certain limitations of the present study, including a relatively small sample size and the lack of validation in a larger cohort of patients. Additionally, the results obtained through MALDI-TOF MS were not validated using a molecular identification method, such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification or PCR. In the future, research on the diversity of the K. pneumoniae genome may reveal differences in virulence, epidemiology, evolution, and genetic characteristics. Through next-generation sequencing, we will be able to gain a better understanding of the molecular causes of infectious diseases such as K. pneumoniae. Sequencing the entire genome allows scientists to discover mutations associated with virulence, epidemiology, evolution, and genetic characteristics. This knowledge can be used to develop more effective therapies and management techniques.

Availability of data and materials

All data produced or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Abalkhail A, Elbehiry A (2022) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections: protein profiling, virulence determinants, and antimicrobial resistance. Appl Sci 12(21):10803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abalkhail A, AlYami AS, Alrashedi SF, Almushayqih KM, Alslamah T, Alsalamah YA, Elbehiry A (2022) The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli producing ESBL among male and female patients with urinary tract infections in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare 10(9):1778

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal J, Srivastava S, Singh M (2012) Pathogenomics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Indian J Med Microbiol 30(2):141–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed N, Khalid H, Mushtaq M, Basha S, Rabaan AA, Garout M, Halwani MA, Al Mutair A, Alhumaid S, Al Alawi Z (2022) The molecular characterization of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance patterns in human bacterial uropathogens. Antibiotics 11(4):516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Beloushi A, Elbehiry A, Marzouk E (2018) Mass spectrometry technology and qPCR for detection of Enterococcus faecalis in diabetic foot patients. J Pure Appl Microbiol 12(4):1743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali I, Rafaque Z, Ahmed S, Malik S, Dasti JI (2016) Prevalence of multi-drug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Potohar region of Pakistan. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6(1):60–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson DI, Balaban NQ, Baquero F, Courvalin P, Glaser P, Gophna U, Kishony R, Molin S, Tønjum T (2020) Antibiotic resistance: turning evolutionary principles into clinical reality. FEMS Microbiol Rev 44(2):171–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angeletti S (2017) Matrix assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in clinical microbiology. J Microbiol Methods 138:20–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anju V, Siddhardha B, Dyavaiah M (2020) Enterobacter infections and antimicrobial drug resistance. In: Siddhardha B, Dyavaiah M, Syed A (eds) Model organisms for microbial pathogenesis, biofilm formation and antimicrobial drug discovery. Springer, Singapore, pp 175–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Annavajhala MK, Gomez-Simmonds A, Uhlemann A-C (2019) Multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex emerging as a global, diversifying threat. Front Microbiol 10:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Azar N, Khodor M, Choucair J, Hamze M, Pirenne H (2023) ’Susceptibility of urinary Enterobacteriaceae to selected antimicrobials in an out-patient setting in Wallonia-Belgium: retrospective analysis over 5 years period (2018–2022). Ann Biol Clin (paris). 81:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Barguigua A, El Otmani F, Talmi M, Zerouali K, Timinouni M (2013) Prevalence and types of extended spectrum β-lactamases among urinary Escherichia coli isolates in Moroccan community. Microb Pathog 61:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassetti M, Giacobbe DR (2020) A look at the clinical, economic, and societal impact of antimicrobial resistance in 2020. Expert Opin Pharmacother 21(17):2067–2071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett W, Mende K, Campbell WR, Beckius M, Stewart L, Shaikh F, Rahman A, Tribble DR, Yabes JM (2023) Enterobacter cloacae infection characteristics and outcomes in battlefield trauma patients. PLoS ONE 18(8):e0290735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Rolain J-M (2013) Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for identification of bacteria that are difficult to culture. J Microbiol Methods 92(1):14–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns KA, Hall V, Martin GE, Griffin DW, Stewart JD, Khan SF, Abbott IJ, Meher-Homji Z, Morrissey CO, Sia C (2021) Treatment of invasive IMP-4 Enterobacter cloacae infection in transplant recipients using ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam: a case series and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis 23(2):e13510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candela A, Guerrero-López A, Mateos M, Gómez-Asenjo A, Arroyo MJ, Hernandez-García M, Del Campo R, Cercenado E, Cuénod A, Méndez G (2023) Automatic discrimination of species within the Enterobacter cloacae complex using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and supervised algorithms. J Clin Microbiol 61(4):e01049-e1122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll KC, Glanz BD, Borek AP, Burger C, Bhally HS, Henciak S, Flayhart D (2006) Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 44(10):3506–3509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano A, Iacopetta D, Ceramella J, Pellegrino M, Giuzio F, Marra M, Rosano C, Saturnino C, Sinicropi MS, Aquaro S (2023) Antibiotic-resistant ESKAPE pathogens and COVID-19: the pandemic beyond the pandemic. Viruses 15(9):1843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chalupová J, Raus M, Sedlářová M, Šebela M (2014) Identification of fungal microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Adv 32(1):230–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Yang G-L, Li W-P, Li M-C, Bao X-Y (2021) Antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology of extended spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae isolates from intensive care units at obstetrics & gynaecology departments: a retrospective analysis. Clin Exp Obstetr Gynecol. 48(4):820–827. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4804131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-C, Lee W-C, Chuang Y-C (2023) Emerging non-antibiotic options targeting uropathogenic mechanisms for recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Int J Mol Sci 24(8):7055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Kaleta EJ, Arora A, Wolk DM (2013) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry: a fundamental shift in the routine practice of clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 26(3):547–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cornaglia G, Courcol R, Herrmann J, Kahlmeter G, Peigue-Lafeuille H, Jordi V (2012) European manual of clinical microbiology. European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Davin-Regli A, Pagès J-M (2015) Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment. Front Microbiol 6:392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davin-Regli A, Lavigne JP, Pagès JM (2019) Enterobacter spp: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00002-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Florio L, Riva E, Giona A, Dedej E, Fogolari M, Cella E, Spoto S, Lai A, Zehender G, Ciccozzi M (2018) MALDI-TOF MS identification and clustering applied to Enterobacter species in nosocomial setting. Front Microbiol 9:1885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira DM, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PN, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, Paterson DL, Walker MJ (2020) Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00181-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dehkordi EB, Tajbakhsh E, Momtaz H (2022) Molecular characterization of Enterobacter cloacae isolated from urinary tract infections. Jundishapur J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-122718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcaru C, Podgoreanu P, Alexandru I, Popescu N, Măruţescu L, Bleotu C, Mogoşanu GD, Chifiriuc MC, Gluck M, Lazăr V (2017) Antibiotic resistance and virulence phenotypes of recent bacterial strains isolated from urinary tract infections in elderly patients with prostatic disease. Pathogens 6(2):22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Al-Dubaib M, Marzouk E, Osman S, Edrees H (2016) Performance of MALDI biotyper compared with Vitek™ 2 compact system for fast identification and discrimination of Staphylococcus species isolated from bovine mastitis. MicrobiologyOpen 5(6):1061–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Hamada M, Al-Dubaib M, Alyamani E, Moussa IM, AlRowaidhan A, Hemeg HA (2017) Application of MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting as a quick tool for identification and clustering of foodborne pathogens isolated from food products. New Microbiol 40(4):269–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Al-Dubaib M, Marzouk E, Moussa I (2019a) Antibacterial effects and resistance induction of silver and gold nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis and the potential toxicity in rats. MicrobiologyOpen 8(4):e00698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Abdeen E, Al-Dubaib M, Alsayeqh A, Ibrahem M, Hamada M, Alenzi A, Moussa I, Hemeg HA (2019b) Proteomic characterization and discrimination of Aeromonas species recovered from meat and water samples with a spotlight on the antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas hydrophila. Microbiologyopen 8(11):e782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Moussa IM, Dawoud TM, Mubarak AS, Al-Sarar D, Alsubki RA, Alhaji JH, Hamada M, Abalkhail A (2021) Acinetobacter baumannii as a community foodborne pathogen: peptide mass fingerprinting analysis, genotypic of biofilm formation and phenotypic pattern of antimicrobial resistance. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(1):1158–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Aldubaib M, Abalkhail A, Marzouk E, ALbeloushi A, Moussa I, Ibrahem M, Albazie H, Alqarni A, Anagreyyah S, (2022a) How MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry technology contributes to microbial infection control in healthcare settings. Vaccines 10(11):1881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Aldubaib M, Al Rugaie O, Marzouk E, Abaalkhail M, Moussa I, El-Husseiny MH, Abalkhail A, Rawway M (2022b) Proteomics-based screening and antibiotic resistance assessment of clinical and sub-clinical Brucella species: an evolution of brucellosis infection control. PLoS ONE 17(1):e0262551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Abalkhail A, El-Garawany Y, Anagreyyah S, Alnafea Y, Almuzaini AM, Alwarhi W, Rawway M, Draz A (2022c) The development of technology to prevent, diagnose, and manage antimicrobial resistance in healthcare-associated infections. Vaccines 10(12):2100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Aldubaib M, Moussa I, Abalkhail A, Ibrahem M, Hamada M, Sindi W, Alzaben F, Almuzaini AM (2022d) Pseudomonas species prevalence, protein analysis, and antibiotic resistance: an evolving public health challenge. AMB Express 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Moussa I, Anagreyyah S, AlGhamdi A, Alqarni A, Aljohani A, Hemeg HA, Almuzaini AM, Alzaben F (2023) Using protein fingerprinting for identifying and discriminating methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from inpatient and outpatient clinics. Diagnostics 13(17):2825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gajdács M, Urbán E (2019) Resistance trends and epidemiology of Citrobacter-Enterobacter-serratia in urinary tract infections of inpatients and outpatients (RECESUTI): a 10-year survey. Medicina 55(6):285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ganbold M, Seo J, Wi YM, Kwon KT, Ko KS (2023) Species identification, antibiotic resistance, and virulence in Enterobacter cloacae complex clinical isolates from South Korea. Front Microbiol 14:1122691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldi G, Montesano M, Napoli C, Frati P, La Russa R, Santurro A, Scopetti M, Orsi GB (2019) Healthcare-associated infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms: a surveillance study on extra hospital stay and direct costs. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 20(8):643–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godmer A, Benzerara Y, Normand AC, Veziris N, Gallah S, Eckert C, Morand P, Piarroux R, Aubry A (2021) Revisiting species identification within the Enterobacter cloacae complex by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. Microbiol Spectrum 9(1):e00661-e721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greub G, Prod’Hom G (2011) Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Clin Microbiol Rev Infect 17(5):655–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haider A, Ringer M, Kotroczó Z, Mohácsi-Farkas C, Kocsis T (2023) The current level of MALDI-TOF MS applications in the detection of microorganisms: a short review of benefits and limitations. Microbiol Res (pavia) 14(1):80–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammami S, Saidani M, Ferjeni S, Aissa I, Slim A, Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I (2013) Characterization of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in community-acquired urinary tract infections in Tunisia. Microb Drug Resist 19(3):231–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haque A, Mishu NJ, Khaleduzzaman H, Shamsuzzaman S, Sarker A, Ahmed MZ, Mitu RZ, Kabir RB, Asaduzzaman M (2023) Detection of antibiotic resistance genes of multidrug resistance Enterobacter Cloacae and Enterobacter Aerogenes isolated from the patients of Dhaka medical college hospital. Immunology 7:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann H, Roggenkamp A (2003) Population genetics of the nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(9):5306–5318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hryniewicz K, Szczypa K, Sulikowska A, Jankowski K, Betlejewska K, Hryniewicz W (2001) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from urinary tract infections in Poland. J Antimicrob Chemother 47(6):773–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner C, Roggelin M, Flessa S (2016) Economic burden of multidrug-resistant bacteria in nursing homes in Germany: a cost analysis based on empirical data. BMJ Open 6(2):e008458

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim ME (2023) Risk factors in acquiring multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in a hospital setting in Saudi Arabia. Sci Rep 13(1):11626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Intra J, Carcione D, Sala RM, Siracusa C, Brambilla P, Leoni V (2023) Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella aerogenes strains isolated from clinical specimens: a twenty-year surveillance study. Antibiotics 12(4):775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou P, Vamvoukaki R, Kofteridis DP (2022) Infective endocarditis by Enterobacter cloacae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Chemother 34(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain N, Jansone I, Obidenova T, Simanis R, Meisters J, Straupmane D, Reinis A (2021) Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial isolates of gram-negative bacteria: public health implications in the latvian context. Antibiotics 10(7):791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Guerra G, Borrego-Jiménez J, Gutiérrez-Soto B, Expósito-Ruiz M, Navarro-Marí JM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J (2020) Susceptibility evolution to antibiotics of Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella aerogenes and Citrobacter freundii involved in urinary tract infections: an 11-year epidemiological surveillance study. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 38(4):166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John AS, Mboto CI, Agbo B (2016) A review on the prevalence and predisposing factors responsible for urinary tract infection among adults. Euro J Exp Bio 6(4):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettani Halabi M, Lahlou FA, Diawara I, El Adouzi Y, Marnaoui R, Benmessaoud R, Smyej I (2021) Antibiotic resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Morocco. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:720701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kosikowska U, Andrzejczuk S, Grywalska E, Chwiejczak E, Winiarczyk S, Pietras-Ożga D, Stępień-Pyśniak D (2020) Prevalence of susceptibility patterns of opportunistic bacteria in line with CLSI or EUCAST among Haemophilus parainfluenzae isolated from respiratory microbiota. Sci Rep 10(1):11512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lartigue M-F (2013) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for bacterial strain characterization. Infect Genet Evol 13:230–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Fang R, Zhang Y, Chen L, Huang N, Yu K, Zhou C, Cao J, Zhou T (2021) Characterization of resistance mechanisms of Enterobacter cloacae complex co-resistant to carbapenem and colistin. BMC Microbiol 21(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso G, De Gaetano S, Midiri A, Zummo S, Biondo C (2023a) The challenge of overcoming antibiotic resistance in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria:“attack on Titan.” Microorganisms. 11(8):1912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Marra M, Zummo S, Biondo C (2023b) Urinary tract infections: the current scenario and future prospects. Pathogens 12(4):623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez JL (2009) The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 276(1667):2521–2530

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Muratani T (2004) Newer carbapenems for urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 24:35–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen S, Tesfa T, Shume T, Tebeje F, Urgesa K, Weldegebreal F (2023) Bacterial profile, their antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and associated factors of urinary tract infections in children at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 18(4):e0283637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S (2012) Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7(7):887–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Msimango T, Duvenage S, Du Plessis EM, Korsten L (2023) Microbiological quality assessment of fresh produce: potential health risk to children and urgent need for improved food safety in school feeding schemes. Food Sci Nutr 11(9):5501–5511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mulani MS, Kamble EE, Kumkar SN, Tawre MS, Pardesi KR (2019) Emerging strategies to combat ESKAPE pathogens in the era of antimicrobial resistance: a review. Front Microbiol 10:539

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafai MM, Hafeez M, Munawar S, Basha S, Rabaan AA, Halwani MA, Alawfi A, Alshengeti A, Najim MA, Alwarthan S (2023) Prevalence of carbapenemase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: a cross-sectional study. Antibiotics 12(1):148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naveed M, Bukhari B, Afzal N, Sadia H, Meer B, Riaz T, Ali U, Ahmed N (2021) Geographical, molecular, and computational analysis of migraine-causing genes. J Comput Biophys Chem 20(04):391–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naveed M, Ali U, Karobari MI, Ahmed N, Mohamed RN, Abullais SS, Kader MA, Marya A, Messina P, Scardina GA (2022a) A vaccine construction against COVID-19-associated mucormycosis contrived with immunoinformatics-based scavenging of potential Mucoralean Epitopes. Vaccines 10(5):664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naveed M, Jabeen K, Naz R, Mughal MS, Rabaan AA, Bakhrebah MA, Alhoshani FM, Aljeldah M, Shammari BRA, Alissa M (2022b) Regulation of host immune response against Enterobacter cloacae proteins via computational mRNA vaccine design through transcriptional modification. Microorganisms 10(8):1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naveed M, Yaseen AR, Khalid H, Ali U, Rabaan AA, Garout M, Halwani MA, Al Mutair A, Alhumaid S, Al Alawi Z (2022c) Execution and design of an anti HPIV-1 vaccine with multiple epitopes triggering innate and adaptive immune responses: an immunoinformatic approach. Vaccines 10(6):869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neupane S, Pant ND, Khatiwada S, Chaudhary R, Banjara MR (2016) Correlation between biofilm formation and resistance toward different commonly used antibiotics along with extended spectrum beta lactamase production in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from the patients suspected of urinary tract infections visiting Shree Birendra Hospital, Chhauni, Kathmandu, Nepal. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 5:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New C (2007) CLSI announces availability of new CLSI microbiology documents. Clin Microbiol Newsl 29:46–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen B-AT, Chen Q-L, He J-Z, Hu H-W (2020) Microbial regulation of natural antibiotic resistance: understanding the protist-bacteria interactions for evolution of soil resistome. Sci Total Environ 705:135882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Díez G, Mengíbar RL, Turrientes M-C, Artigao M-RB, Gallifa RL, Tello AM, Pérez CF, Santiago TA (2023) Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for acquisition and colonization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from dogs attended at a veterinary hospital in Spain. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 92:101922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osundiya O, Oladele R, Oduyebo O (2013) Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indices of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella species isolates in Lagos university teaching hospital. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol 14(3):164–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk R, Murt A (2020) Epidemiology of urological infections: a global burden. World J Urol 38:2669–2679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardeshi P (2018) Prevalence of urinary tract infections and current scenario of antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacteria causing UTI. Indian J Microbiol Res 5(3):334–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel KK, Patel S (2016) Enterobacter spp: an emerging nosocomial infection. Int J Appl Res 2(11):532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson DL, Bonomo RA (2005) Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev 18(4):657–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovic M, Konrad R, Iwobi AN, Sing A, Busch U, Huber I (2012) A dual approach employing MALDI-TOF MS and real-time PCR for fast species identification within the Enterobacter cloacae complex. FEMS Microbiol Lett 328(1):46–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quraishi M, Saleh AA, Roy CK, Afroz F, Mohiuddin G (2019) Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Enterobacter species isolated from different clinical specimens in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Med Microbiol 13(2):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabaan AA, Alhumaid S, Mutair AA, Garout M, Abulhamayel Y, Halwani MA, Alestad JH, Bshabshe AA, Sulaiman T, AlFonaisan MK (2022) Application of artificial intelligence in combating high antimicrobial resistance rates. Antibiotics 11(6):784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ratajczak JM, Hladun T, Krenz B, Bromber K, Salagierski M, Marczak M (2022) Can we identify patients in danger of complications in retrograde intrarenal surgery?—A retrospective risk factors analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(3):1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roemhild R, Gokhale CS, Dirksen P, Blake C, Rosenstiel P, Traulsen A, Andersson DI, Schulenburg H (2018) Cellular hysteresis as a principle to maximize the efficacy of antibiotic therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(39):9767–9772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rordorf G, Koroshetz W, Efird JT, Cramer SC (2000) Predictors of mortality in stroke patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28(5):1301–1305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saipriya J, Shubha D, Sudhindra K, Sumantha A, Madhuri K (2018) Clinical importance of emerging ESKAPE pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility profile from a tertiary care centre. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7:2881–2891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salam MA, Al-Amin MY, Salam MT, Pawar JS, Akhter N, Rabaan AA, Alqumber MA (2023) Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare 11(13):1946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan M, Ramachandran B, Barabadi H (2018) The prevalence and drug resistance pattern of extended spectrum β–lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa. Microb Pathog 114:180–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selvarajan R, Obize C, Sibanda T, Abia ALK, Long H (2022) Evolution and emergence of antibiotic resistance in given ecosystems: possible strategies for addressing the challenge of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics 12(1):28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shakya P, Shrestha D, Maharjan E, Sharma VK, Paudyal R (2017) ESBL production among E. coli and Klebsiella spp. causing urinary tract infection: a hospital based study. Open Microbiol J. 11:23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Multani A, Cmar J (2017) Microbiology of virulence: urinary tract infection versus colonization. In: Gordon DA, Katlic MR (eds) Pelvic floor dysfunction and pelvic surgery in the elderly: an integrated approach. Springer, New York, pp 77–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK, Bezdan D, Checinska Sielaff A, Wheeler K, Mason CE, Venkateswaran K (2018) Multi-drug resistant Enterobacter bugandensis species isolated from the International Space Station and comparative genomic analyses with human pathogenic strains. BMC Microbiol 18:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock I, Grüger T, Wiedemann B (2001) Natural antibiotic susceptibility of strains of the Enterobacter cloacae complex. Int J Antimicrob Agents 18(6):537–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton GG, Brinkac LM, Clarke TH, Fouts DE (2018) Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii subsp. nov., Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis comb. nov., Enterobacter roggenkampii sp. nov., and Enterobacter muelleri is a later heterotypic synonym of Enterobacter asburiae based on computational analysis of sequenced Enterobacter genomes. Fresearch. 7:521

    Google Scholar 

  • Takei K, Ogawa M, Sakata R, Kanamori H (2023) Epidemiological characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Japan: a nationwide analysis of data from a clinical laboratory center (2016–2022). Pathogens 12(10):1246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tan CW, Chlebicki MP (2016) Urinary tract infections in adults. Singapore Med J 57(9):485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teklu DS, Negeri AA, Legese MH, Bedada TL, Woldemariam HK, Tullu KD (2019) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 8:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner L, Papa N, Aliyu SH, Dev H, Lawrentschuk N, Al-Hayek S (2016) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital urinary tract infections: incidence and antibiotic susceptibility profile over 9 years. World J Urol 34:1031–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida S, Umemura H, Nakayama T (2020) Current status of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in clinical diagnostic microbiology. Molecules 25(20):4775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vandepitte J (2003) Basic laboratory procedures in clinical bacteriology. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Xiao S-Z, Gu F-F, Tang J, Guo X-K, Ni Y-X, Qu J-M, Han L-Z (2017) Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of clinical Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream isolates in Shanghai. China Plos One 12(12):e0189713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DJ, Middleton JR, Adkins PR, Goodell GM (2019) Test agreement among biochemical methods, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry, and 16S rRNA sequencing for identification of microorganisms isolated from bovine milk. J Clin Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01381-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Feng Y, Zong Z (2019) Characterization of a strain representing a new Enterobacter species, Enterobacter chengduensis sp. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 112:491–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra N, Zeshan B, Qadri MMA, Ishaq M, Afzal M, Ahmed N (2021) Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteria isolated from surgical intensive care unit patients in Pakistan. Jundishapur J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.113008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research through project no. (IFKSUOR3– 083–4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, AE and IM; Data curation, AE; Formal analysis, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA and HA; Investigation, AE, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA and HA; Methodology, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA and HA; Project administration, AE and IM; Resources, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA, HA, AA and AAb; Software, AE and MI; Supervision, AE; Validation, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA, HA, AA and AAb; Visualization, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA, HA, AA and AAb; Writing—original draft, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA and HA, Writing—review and editing, AE, MAl-S, HA, MI, IM, FA, RAA, HAH, DA, SA, FA, SAA, HA, AA and AAb.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman Elbehiry.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could affect the work reported in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbehiry, A., Al Shoaibi, M., Alzahrani, H. et al. Enterobacter cloacae from urinary tract infections: frequency, protein analysis, and antimicrobial resistance. AMB Expr 14, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01675-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01675-7

Keywords