Oligoagars and microbial agents show potential for Porphyra disease prevention
AMB Express volume 13, Article number: 128 (2023)
Disease is a major concern in Porphyra aquaculture, particularly during the early shell-borne conchocelis (SBC) seedling stage. To explore prevention strategies for Porphyra diseases, this study explored the potential of using oligoagars (OA) and microbial agents (MA) to treat SBC of Neoporphyra haitanensis in an aquaculture environment. The impact of these treatments on the phycosphere microbial community was analyzed, and the resistance of the treated Porphyra conchocelis to the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6 (which causes yellow spot disease) was tested in the lab. Results showed that OA reduced α-diversity while enriching Rhodobacteriaceae, and MA increased stability and relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (including Flavobacteria). Furthermore, compared to the control group, the abundance of pathogenic microorganisms and virulence functional genes decreased while defense-related functional gene abundance increased significantly in the groups treated with OA and MA. Most importantly, the OA and MA treatments improved resistance to Vm117-T6, with survival rates of 70% (OA) and 80% (MA), compared to 15% in the control group. Overall, the findings suggest that OA and MA treatments have great potential for preventing Porphyra disease, as they improve phycosphere microorganisms and increase algae resistance to pathogenic bacteria.
OA treatment enriched Rhodobacteraceae species within phycosphere.
MA improved microbiota stability, reducing pathogenic microbes and increasing defense genes.
OA and MA treatments improve the disease status.
Algae are a polyphyletic group of mostly photosynthetic organisms with substantial ecological significance and numerous application potentials in the human economy (Karimi et al. 2021). China has a rich history of seaweed cultivation and is currently the world’s largest producer of these macroalgae (Luo et al. 2023). Among the seaweeds cultivated in China, the species Neoporphyra haitanensis, a red algae indigenous to the coastal waters of southern China, has been widely farmed, with a production yield of over 70% in the country. In the life cycle of Pyropia spp., the conchocelis is a sexual reproduction stage in the life history of Pyropia spp. (Chen et al. 2022). It can be divided into two forms: shell-borne conchocelis (SBC) and free-living conchocelis (FLC). Those that grow within shells are referred to as SBC, while the conchocelis that float freely in seawater is called FLC. For Porphyra cultivation, SBC sporeling phase is a critical stage that plays a crucial role in ensuring the effective growth and development of the seaweed during subsequent cultivation in the marine environment (Chen et al. 2022).
In recent years, the occurrence of frequent diseases has become a major bottleneck in the development of the Porphyra farming industry (Ben 2007; Wang et al. 2020a, b; Ward et al. 2020). While disinfection, extensive water replacement, and shell cleaning can be used to prevent and control diseases during the SBC cultivation stage, chemical use can disrupt the microecological balance of aquaculture systems (Liu et al. 2020). Although a large amount of water change and shell cleaning could alleviate the breeding system’s burden, it cannot effectively improve specific bacterial diseases and may create conditions for the outbreak of pathogenic bacteria. Bacteriophages can be used to increase Porphyra survival when infected with pathogenic bacteria (Zhu et al. 2021), but they have a specific inhibitory effect with limited targets. Furthermore, the therapeutic effect may decrease due to the enhanced resistance of pathogenic bacteria to bacteriophages (Hampton et al. 2020). Therefore, it’s necessary to develop more comprehensive and efficient disease prevention and control technologies.
Similar to the rhizosphere of plants, algae cells secrete nutrients outward, creating a specific region around the algae known as the “phycosphere” (Bell and Mitchell 1972; Ramanan et al. 2016). Within this region, microorganisms utilize the extracellular products of algae to grow and supplement their nutrients, while algae also benefit from the microorganisms (Martin et al. 2014). The relationship between phycosphere microbes and cultivated algae is crucial for the growth and health of algae (Wang et al. 2020a, 2022; Yan et al. 2019), understanding the phycosphere microbiome can inform the development of strategies to improve the health and yield of cultivated algae.
In recent years, microbial regulation methods have gained significant attention and application in the aquaculture industry. One such method involves the use of microbial agents (MA) comprising lactic acid bacteria, photosynthetic bacteria, bacillus, yeast, Effective Microorganisms (EM), and biological antimicrobial peptides (Fan et al. 2021). These MA have been widely utilized as feed additives, water quality improvers, and disease prevention and control measures, contributing to the maintenance of ecosystem stability in aquaculture systems. Studies have shown promising results in the application of MA for improving the cultivation of various aquaculture systems, including shrimp larvae and fish (Fan et al. 2021; Hong et al. 2020). Although there are limited reports on the use of MA in seaweed culture, it is feasible to apply this method to regulate microbial populations and control disease occurrence in seaweed cultivation (Li et al. 2022). In fact, some Porphyra farmers have already employed MA to manage diseases, indicating the practical implementation of this approach in seaweed cultivation (personal communication with Lei Ke). Therefore, further research is needed to explore the potential of using microbial regulation methods, particularly MA, in seaweed cultivation to enhance production and disease resistance.
Elicitors are a unique category of compounds that have the ability to activate host defense responses (Nurnberger and Kernmerling 2006). One such elicitor class is the oligoagars (OA), which not only enhance resistance to high temperature and decay of Porphyra (Chen et al. 2016; Zhu et al. 2012b), but also have the potential to effectively protect it from pathogenic bacteria (Mao et al. 2023). Interestingly, research conducted by Zhu et al. (2012a) reveals that OA also impacts the epiphytic microorganisms residing on Porphyra. So, we propose a hypothesis: could the impact of OA stimulation on phycosphere microorganisms be associated with its ability to augment Porphyra’s disease resistance?
In the present study, we used OA and MA to treat Neoporphyra haitanensis SBC in the breeding environment, using metagenomics to analyzed the changes of phycosphere microorganisms, and infected Porphyra conchocelis with the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6 of yellow spot disease (Liu et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2020) in the lab, by combining the survival rate of algae and the changes of microorganisms, we discussed the disease control effects of OA and MA.
Materials and methods
FLC of N. haitanensis ct. ZD-1
The free-living conchocelis (FLC) of N. haitanensis ct. ZD-1 was provided by the Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology of Zhejiang Province (KLMBZ), Ningbo University, China. FLC with bright red color and healthy condition were selected. The culture medium was NBU-3 (Xu et al. 2020). The culture temperature was 20 °C, pH 8.0 ± 0.2, the salinity of sterile seawater was 25, the photoperiod was 12: 12 h (L:D; light: dark), and the light intensity was 30 μ mol·photons·m−2·s−1.
The experiment was conducted at Ningbo Yinzhou Jinfeng Aquatic Products Food Co., Ltd (29°32′ N, 121°31′ E). Twelve standardized Porphyra sporeling nursery ponds (4 m × 13 m × 0.8 m) were selected randomly. The inoculation time of Neoporphyra haitanensis shell-borne conchocelis (SBC) preparation was April 2, 2021. Every 20 shells of Meretrix meretrix L. were strung into a string, and the shell strings were hung neatly in the sporeling nursery ponds immersed in seawater. FLC of N. haitanensis ct. ZD-1 was broken into about 200-μm fragments by a household blender. About 10–15 g FLC (fresh weight) was sprinkled on the shell strings of about 100 m2 area. The ponds were covered with black plastic film for 3 days. The excess items from the shell surface were washed after 10 to 15 days, and then SBC was cultured under natural conditions. After 60 days, the conchocelis was full of shell surface, and the whole shell became dark red, which could be used for the follow-up experiments.
OA and MA
The OA was prepared as previously described (Chen et al. 2004). Briefly, 20 g agar powder was added to 1 L pure water and heated until the solution was clarified. Then, the agar solution was degraded with 0.05 mol/L HCl at 90 °C for 2 h. Once the solution was cooled to room temperature, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.8 with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to obtain a 2% OA solution with 2–10 degrees of polymerization. The solution was stored at 4 °C. The MA utilized in this experiment was Effective Microorganisms (EM), which is a novel compound microbial active agent developed by Professor Higa Teruo, a distinguished applied microbiologist from Ryukyu University in Japan (Deng et al. 2020). The EM used in this study was produced by China Shandong Baolai-Leelai Bio-Industrial Group (located in Shandong, China). It appears as a brown translucent liquid with a pH value ranging from 3.5 to 4.5. EM consists of a diverse range of microorganisms, including lactic acid bacteria, butyric acid bacteria, actinobacteria, yeasts, and photosynthetic bacteria. These microbial strains were derived from bacterial clones isolated from various sources such as aquaculture water bodies, sediments, and the surfaces and bodies of aquatic animals. The total viable bacteria count of the EM used in this study was at least 80 × 108 CFU mL−1 (CFU: Colony-Forming Units). All of these parameters were provided by China Shandong Baolai-Leelai Bio-Industrial Group.
Preparation of Vm 117-T6 (Vibrio)
The Vm 117-T6 strain (Vibrio) was collected from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center under the collection code NO. CGMCC 1.16311. It has been identified as the pathogen responsible for yellow spot disease in Porphyra SBC, as reported by Liu et al. (2019) and Yang et al. (2020). The Vm 117-T6 strain, provided by the KLMBZ, was activated and proliferated in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 28 °C and 110 r/min for 12 h and then centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. When the bacteria were grown to an OD600 of approximately 0.6, the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 108 CFU/mL with boiling-sterilized seawater (filtrated with a 0.22-μm microporous membrane and boiled for 5 min) for subsequent experiments.
OA and MA treatment
SBC nursery pond: OA, MA, and MO (MA + OA) treatments were performed on June 12, 2021. Briefly, a 2% OA solution was added according to the water volume of the sporeling nursery pond and evenly sprinkled in the pond to make the final concentration of OA solution 0.1‰. After 1 h, the pond water was replaced. After 48 h, the second OA treatment was carried out with the same steps. MA solution was evenly sprinkled into the nursery ponds at 5 mg/L without any process before sample collection. MO treatment was conducted by adding MA solution into the nursery ponds after OA treatment was completed. Each treatment had three replicates.
FLC was treated with OA, MA, and MO by the same method as SBC nursery ponds for pathogen infection.
Metagenomics analysis of phycosphere microorganisms
After 1 week, the samples of phycosphere microorganisms were collected, including (i) CK (control group without treatment), (ii) OA, (iii) MA, (iv) MO. There were three replicate samples for each group.
The seawater of the nursery pond was maintained under the following conditions: temperature 21–23 °C, pH 8.0–8.3, salinity 20–23, nitrate nitrogen 0.017–0.061 mg/L, and ammonia nitrogen 0.016–0.045 mg/L. Moreover, the conditions did not change with or without the addition of OA, MA, or both (MO).
The sample collection was carried out as previously described (Liu et al. 2020). SBC was collected (about 10 pieces/treatment), the shell surface was washed with sterilized seawater, and 500 mg of conchocelis was scraped from the shell with a sterilized scalpel. The mixture was then filtered through a 0.2-μm polycarbonate membrane (Millipore, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) after being pre-filtered with a 100-μm sterilized nylon mesh to collect phycosphere microorganisms. A total of 12 phycosphere samples were collected and stored at − 80 °C for DNA extraction.
DNA extraction, library construction, and metagenomic sequencing
DNA on polycarbonate membrane was extracted using the Power Soil® DNA Kit (MOBIO, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and purity of extracted DNA were determined with TBS-380 and NanoDrop2000, respectively. DNA quality was checked on 1% agarose gel. DNA samples were stored at − 80 °C. Extracted DNA was fragmented to an average size of about 400 bp using Covaris M220 (Gene Company Limited, Shanghai, China) for paired-end library construction. The paired-end library was constructed using NEXTflex™ Rapid DNA-Seq (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA). Adapters containing the full complement of sequencing primer hybridization sites were ligated to the blunt end of fragments. Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using NovaSeq Reagent Kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (www.illumina.com). Sequence data associated with this project have been deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive database (Accession Number: PRJNA895529).
Sequence quality control and genome assembly
The raw reads from metagenome sequencing were used to generate clean reads by removing adaptor-containing sequences and low-quality reads (reads with N bases, a minimum length threshold of 50 bp and a minimum quality threshold of 20) using fastp (Chen et al. 2018) on the free online platform of Majorbio Cloud Platform (cloud.majorbio.com). These high-quality reads were then assembled to contigs using MEGAHIT (Li et al. 2015) (parameters: kmer_min=47, kmer_max=97, step=10). Finally, contigs with a length being or over 300 bp were selected as the final assembling result.
Gene prediction, taxonomy, and functional annotation
Open reading frames (ORFs) in contigs were identified using MetaGene (Noguchi et al. 2006). The predicted ORFs with a length being or over 100 bp were retrieved and translated into amino acid sequences using the NCBI translation table.
A non-redundant gene catalog was constructed using CD-HIT (Fu et al. 2012) with 90% sequence identity and 90% coverage. Reads after quality control were mapped to the non-redundant gene catalog with 95% identity using SOAPaligner (Li et al. 2008), and gene abundance in each sample was evaluated.
Representative sequences of non-redundant gene catalog were annotated based on the NCBI NR database using blastp as implemented in DIAMOND v0.9.19 with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5 using Diamond (Buchfink et al. 2015) for taxonomic annotations. Cluster of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) annotation for the representative sequences were performed using Diamond (Buchfink et al. 2015) (http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) against eggNOG database (version 4.5.1) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5. The KEGG annotation was conducted using Diamond (Buchfink et al. 2015) (http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (http://www.genome.jp/keeg/, version 94.2) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5. Carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) annotation was conducted using hmmscan (http://hmmer.janelia.org/search/hmmscan) against CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org/) with an e-value cutoff of 1e-5. Virulence factor genes (VFs) annotation was conducted using Diamond (Buchfink et al. 2015) against the VFDB database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5. Pathogen annotation for the representative sequences were performed using Diamond (Buchfink et al. 2015) (http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) against PHI database (http://www.phi-base.org/index.jsp, version 2.2.31) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5.
Infection of Vm 117-T6
The infection experiments of FLC were conducted in 250-mL conical flasks containing 100 mL of culture medium and 100 mg of FLC. Each treatment had three replicates. The microscopic characteristics of FLC were observed daily using 0.5% Evan’s blue stain (Yang et al. 2020). The living cells remained red, and the dead cells were dyed blue. The Survival percent represented by the percentage of healthy cells to all cells in more than 20 fields was counted to evaluate the disease resistance efficacy of different treatments.
The infection experiments of SBC were carried out in cuboid plastic boxes (0.3 m × 0.05 m × 0.05 m). The SBC and seawater retrieved from the above treatment ponds were added to each cuboid container. Vm 117-T6 medium solution and seawater were added to the cuboid box at a ratio of 1:1. The shell color and characteristics were photographed. Each treatment had three replicates.
Data analysis and statistics
Alpha-diversity indices were computed using Phyloseq (Mcmurdie et al. 2013). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to test the differences in microbial community α-diversity of phycosphere under different treatment conditions using SPSS 22. Community distance matrices based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index were estimated using vegan (Dixon 2003) and visualized by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) tests were performed in vegan (Dixon 2003) to evaluate changes in microbiome structure and composition across treatments. Stability of microbial communities was evaluated by calculating the average variation degree (AVD) index (Xun et al. 2021). Differential abundance analysis of taxonomic groups (log fold change ≥ |2|, Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05) was performed using Phyloseq-DESeq (Mcmurdie et al. 2014) through pairwise comparisons between control and treated samples.
Statistical significance of the different treatment groups was tested using one-way ANOVA with a significance level of P < 0.05, utilizing SPSS 22 and Prism 9 software.
OA lowered microbial diversity, while MA improved microbial stability
As shown in Fig. 1A, the α-diversity index of the phycosphere microbial community was significantly decreased by OA treatment, while MA treatment had no significant effect. However, the NMDS plot manifested significant changes in the phycosphere microbiota during the treatment process (P = 0.001), despite the lack of statistically significant differences in microbial communities between the CK and different treatment groups.
Remarkably, the samples from the MA group clustered together, forming a smaller group, as shown in Fig. 1B, suggesting a more stable phycosphere microbial community in the MA treatment group. This observation is supported by the lower AVD values found in the MA group, as higher stability of microbial communities is indicated by lower AVD values (Xun et al. 2021), as displayed in Fig. 1C.
It is worth noting that samples in the OA group and MO group were close proximityto each other in the NMDS plot (Fig. 1B). Further analysis indicated that the ROA VS. MO < RMA VS. MO, meaning that microbial communities differed greatly between the MO and MA treatment groups, while the difference was smaller compared to the OA treatment group (Table 1).
OA treatment enriched Rhodobacteraceae species within phycosphere
As shown in Fig. 2A, Proteobacteria (including Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma-, and Delta-Proteobacteria), Plactomyctes, and Bacteroidetes are dominant phyla in the phycosphere, further analysis showed significant changes in Bacteroidetes under different treatment conditions (Fig. 2B), and the most abundant family in Proteobacteria, Rhodobacteraceae, also showed significant changes (Fig. 2C).
Through Phyloseq-DESeq analysis, it was discovered that in the abundance top 100 of the phycosphere microbiota, OA and MO treatments significantly upregulated numerous species belonging to the Rhodobacteraceae, including Ahrensia species (eg. Ahrensia_kielensis, Ahrensia_sp._13_GOM-1096m, Ahrensia_marina); Roseovarius species (e.g., Roseovarius_aestuarii), Octadecabacter species (e.g., Octadecabacter_sp._SW4), and Sulfitobacter species (e.g., Sulfitobacter_sp._JL08) (log fold change ≥ |2|, BH-adjusted P ≤ 0.05; Fig. 3C) compared to the CK group. Further analysis by Phyloseq-DESeq revealed that Flavobacteria and Actinobacteria were the most upregulated taxa in response to MA treatment (Fig. 3B).
In PHI-base, a total of 207 pathogens have been annotated (Additional file 1: Table S1). The heatmap of the top 20 abundant pathogens relative abundance showed that, compared to the CK group, the relative abundance of MA, MO, and OA treatment groups was lower (Fig. 3A).
Impact of treatments on phycosphere microbial community functional genes
Our metagenomic analysis results showed significant differences in the functional composition of phycosphere microorganisms, including KO (KEGG Orthology), COG, CAZy, and VFs, among different treatment groups (P < 0.05, see Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Among them, the KEGG module M00660 (KEGG Pathway) is related to diseases, and we found that its abundance was highest in the CK group, while significantly lower in the OA, MA, and MO groups (P < 0.05, Fig. 4A). We annotated a total of 1179 VFs in the VFDB database (see Additional file 1: Table S2), among which the total relative abundance of VFs was highest in the CK group, while significantly lower in the OA, MA, and MO groups (P < 0.05, Fig. 4B). The relative abundance heat map of COG functions is shown in Fig. 4C, and we found that the relative abundance of defense mechanisms was highest in the MA treatment group.
We also listed the COG entries with significant differences (top 15 abundance) in each treatment group (Fig. 4D) and found that most of them were higher in the MA group than in the CK group. These COGs may play important roles in the growth, reproduction, and defense of algae-associated microorganisms. For example, COG0318 plays an important role in DNA damage repair, cell division, and homologous chromosome recombination (Poidevin et al. 2012), COG0463 affects maintaining growth stability (Andersen et al. 2018), COG0515 may function as a signaling molecule or be associated with cell growth and differentiation, stress response, DNA protection, etc. (Kumar et al. 2018), and COG0745 may play an important role in maintaining growth and metabolism (Ma et al. 2017).
OA and MA treatments improve the disease status
Overall, OA and MA treatments showed significant improvements in the disease status of N. haitanensis conchocelis infected by Vm 117-T6 (Figs. 5 and 6). After being infected by Vm 117-T6 for 24 h, the survival rate of the FLC treated with MA was the highest at 80%, followed by OA and MO treatments at 70%. In contrast, the control group only had a survival rate of 15%, which was significantly lower than the treatment groups (P < 0.05).
Similarly, the condition of SBC infected by Vm 117-T6 also showed the same trend. After being infected by Vm 117-T6 for 20 days, the area of yellow spots in SBC treated with MA was the smallest, followed by OA and MO treatment groups. In contrast, the area of yellow spots in SBC of the control group was the largest, almost completely bleached.
OA enriched probiotics related to algae in the phycosphere
According to reports, OA induces defense reactions in algae, producing a variety of defense related compounds, including reactive oxygen (H2O2), NO, phenols, and various volatile components, many of which have bactericidal effects (Pohnert 2004), it could be inferred from this that OA indirectly impacts phycosphere microorganisms through algal activities (Mao et al. 2023). The present study revealed that the application of OA significantly reduced the α-diversity index of the phycosphere microbial community, which is in line with earlier findings by Zhu et al. (2012a). Notably, we also observed that the microbial community β-diversity was higher in the OA treatment group (i.e. the community structure was dispersed among samples), which may be attributed to the re-enrichment and colonization of phycosphere microorganisms by algae after OA stimulation.
In algae research, Rhodobacteraceae has been widely studied as a probiotic microbiota that resistant algal pathogens (Geng and Belas 2010; Luo and Moran Mary 2014). For example, Dogs et al. (2017) found that Sulfitobacter and Octadecabacter related to Fucus spiralis can protect algae from harmful bacteria and other microorganisms. In this study, OA treatment effectively enriched the phycosphere with Rhodobacteriaceae taxonomics such as Ahrensia, Roseovarius, Octadecabacter, and Sulfitoactor, and most of them were related to Roseobacter (Wu et al. 2014), which is known for its positive role in the defense process of algae (Alavi et al. 2001).
Consequently, we believe that in addition to stimulating the immune defense response of algae (Chen et al. 2016; Du et al. 2018; Mao et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2012a, b), OA can also enrich related probiotics in the phycsophere. These probiotics inhibited the infection of Vm117-T6 and enhanced the defense ability of the phycsophere microorganisms, thereby maintaining a high survival rate of N. haitanensis conchocelis.
MA increased phycosphere microbial community stability and defense capabilities
The MA utilized in our study is EM bacteria, which is known for its high survival and reproductive rate, allowing it to quickly and stably occupy ecological niches and become a dominant microflora (Khouadja et al. 2017). Actinobacteria, as one of the major components of EM bacteria, was found to be significantly enriched in the phycosphere of the MA treatment group. This suggests that upon MA application into the seaweed cultivation system, advantageous microbial groups, such as Actinobacteria, may rapidly colonize the phycosphere and form a dominant bacterial community, this will creates an environment unfavorable to the growth of pathogenic microorganisms. Moreover, EM bacteria will also secretes special substances that inhibit the growth of harmful strains (Deng et al. 2020), as supported by our results, which showed lower pathogen abundance in the phycosphere of the MA-treated group compared to the control group. But overall, our results indicate that MA treatment did not have a significant impact on the diversity of phycosphere microorganisms, this result can be attributed to the fact that under normal circulations, macroalgae can attract microbial members, which is beneficial to the algae to colonize and reproduce on its surface (Egan et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2020). This conclusion is consistent with the neutral attributes of MA, such as being green and pollution-free.
Xun et al. (2021) used the AVD index to evaluate the stability of microbial communities. and the results showed that MA treatment led to lower AVD values for phycosphere microbiota. Generally, lower AVD values indicate higher community stability, suggesting that MA treatment increased stability in the phycosphere microbiota community. Furthermore, the taxonomic group with the largest number of significantly up-regulated species was Flavobacteriia, which are mostly beneficial microorganisms in marine aquaculture systems and play a vital role in maintaining colony balance (Keller-Costa et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2015).
Combined with the fact that MA treated N. haitanensis conchocelis had a higher survival rate under Vm117-T6 infection, it can be concluded that MA treatment made the phycsophere microbiota more stable, while the enriched microbial community in the phycsophere community played a positive defensive role with the microbial community in MA, resulting in higher survival rates of algae.
OA had a greater effect on phycosphere microbes when combined with MA
Although both MA and OA improved the composition of microorganisms in the phycsophere, MO treatment induced changes similar to those of OA, suggesting that OA played a more crucial role than MA in modulating the phycosphere microorganisms. This may be due to the ability of OA as an elicitor to induce the production of various defense related compounds in algae (Pohnert 2004), which have a broad-spectrum inhibitory effect on various microorganisms in the environment, whether beneficial or harmful. As a result, the inability of the microbial community in MA to colonize in the algae, reducing the protective efficiency of MA and limiting its role in phycosphere modulation.
Previous studies have indicated that OA treatment has the most significant impact on the algal environment within 1–3 h (Du et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2012a). However, in this experiment, MA was added immediately after the OA treatment was completed. Therefore, the combined processing effect of OA and MA was not reflected. To overcome this, in future Porphyra cultivation, we recommend that MA treatment should be carried out 3 h after the completion of OA treatment, which could improve the combined effect of OA and MA treatment on phycosphere modulation.
Microbial intervention may prevent and control algal disease
The interaction between susceptible hosts, toxic pathogens, and the environment can trigger disease development, and the disease can be prevented if any of the “disease triangle” factors are eliminated (Scholthof 2007). For example, reducing the susceptibility of the host or altering the environmental adaptability of the pathogen can decrease disease incidence (Agrios 2005). Human intervention has been integrated into the disease triangle system to form a disease prevention and control tetrahedron (Andrade-Piedra et al. 2008). People can achieve the goal of disease prevention and treatment by regulating the environment, strengthening the host, inhibiting pathogens, and other ways to achieve the health of the artificial cultivation system. In this study, Both OA and MA can improve microecology of N. haitanensis SBC aquaculture system, and both treatments significantly approved the resistance of N. haitanensis to Vm 117-T6. These findings pave the way for applying OA and MA to control the diseases of N. haitanensis through micro-regulation, providing a valuable reference for the improvement of seaweed culture in the future. Furthermore, in terms of economic effect, the cost of the OA protection method used in this study was only 1.5–3 CNY/100 m2 each time, while it was 10–15 CNY/100 m2 each time for the MA protection method. Overall, the use of OA and MA could have significant implications for the sustainable and profitable cultivation of N. haitanensis and other commercially important algae species.
Availability of data and materials
Sequence data associated with this project have been deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive database (Accession Number: PRJNA895529).
Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier, San Diego
Alavi M, Miller T, Erlandson K, Schneider R, Belas R (2001) Bacterial community associated with Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellate cultures. Environ Microbiol 3(6):380–396. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00207.x
Andersen RA, Brylinski M, Aihara Y, Hess WR, Shiga Y, Tsiokos C, Johnson JG (2018) Evolutionary genomics reveals conserved structural determinants of signaling and adaptation in microbial opsins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803841115
Andrade-Piedra JL, Cáceres P, Pumisacho M, Forbes GA, COSUDE ASpeDylC (2008) Humans: the neglected corner of the disease tetrahedron—developing a training guide for resource-poor farmers to control potato late blight. Acta Hortic 834(834):111–122. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.834.11
Bell W, Mitchell R (1972) Chemotactic and growth responses of marine bacteria to algal extracellular products. Biol Bull 143(2):265–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540052
Ben X (2007) Diseases and control of Porphyra yezoensis conchocelis cultivation. J Aquac 28(1):43–44. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2007.01.022
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH (2015) Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12(1):59–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176
Chen H, Zheng L, Lin W, Yan X (2004) Product monitoring and quantitation of oligosaccharides composition in agar hydrolysates by precolumn labeling HPLC. Talanta 64(3):773–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.04.002
Chen H, Jian Q, Luo Q, Zhu Z, Yang R, Yan X (2016) Application of oligoagars as elicitors for field aquaculture of Pyropia haitanensis. J Appl Phycol 28(3):1783–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0734-y
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J (2018) fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34(17):i884–i890. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
Chen H, Chu JS-C, Chen J, Luo Q, Wang H, Lu R, Zhu Z, Yuan G, Yi X, Mao Y, Lu C, Wang Z, Gu D, Jin Z, Zhang C, Weng Z, Li S, Yan X, Yang R (2022) Insights into the ancient adaptation to intertidal environments by red algae based on a genomic and multiomics investigation of Neoporphyra haitanensis. Mol Biol Evol 39(1):msab315. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab315
Deng R, Meng S, Chen J, Chen C (2020) Application of EM bacteria in aquaculture. Chin Agric Sci Bull 36(11):142–148
Dixon P (2003) VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci 14(6):927–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x
Dogs M, Wemheuer B, Wolter L, Bergen N, Daniel R, Simon M, Brinkhoff T (2017) Rhodobacteraceae on the marine brown alga Fucus spiralis are abundant and show physiological adaptation to an epiphytic lifestyle. Syst Appl Microbiol 40(6):370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2017.05.006
Du L, Yang R, Luo Q, Yan X, Chen H (2018) Response of free-living conchocelis of Pyropia haitanensis to agaro-oligosaccharides. J Fish China 42(7):1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.11964/jfc.20171010994
Egan S, Harder T, Burke C, Steinberg P, Kjelleberg S, Thomas T (2013) The seaweed holobiont: understanding seaweed–bacteria interactions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(3):462–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12011
Fan L, Lin M, Zheng Y (2021) Research progress in the application of microbial preparation in aquaculture. Food Ferment Sci Technol 57(1):4
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W (2012) CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28(23):3150–3152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
Geng H, Belas R (2010) Molecular mechanisms underlying roseobacter–phytoplankton symbioses. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21(3):332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.013
Hampton HG, Watson BNJ, Fineran PC (2020) The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 577(7790):327–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8
Hong J, Xue M, Ning W, Li C, Chen Y, Yu W, Huang X, Liang H, Wen C (2020) Effects of four microbial preparations on water quality and postlarval survival of pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Sci 39(5):316–323. https://doi.org/10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2020.03.003
Karimi Z, Laughinghouse HD, Davis VA, Blersch DM (2021) Substrate properties as controlling parameters in attached algal cultivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105(5):1823–1835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11127-y
Keller-Costa T, Lago-Lestón A, Saraiva JP, Toscan R, Silva SG, Gonçalves J, Cox CJ, Kyrpides N, Nunes da Rocha U, Costa R (2021) Metagenomic insights into the taxonomy, function, and dysbiosis of prokaryotic communities in octocorals. Microbiome 9(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01031-y
Khouadja S, Haddaji N, Hanchi M, Bakhrouf A (2017) Selection of lactic acid bacteria as candidate probiotics for Vibrio parahaemolyticus depuration in pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Aquacult Res 48(4):1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13026
Kumar D, Mishra A, Ali W (2018) Polyamines in algae: physiological role and biotechnological applications. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00155
Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2008) SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24(5):713–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025
Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W (2015) MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31(10):1674–1676. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033
Li J, Weinberger F, de Nys R, Thomas T, Egan S (2022) A pathway to improve seaweed aquaculture through microbiota manipulation. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.08.003
Liu Q, Xu M, He Y, Tao Z, Yang R, Chen H (2019) Complete genome sequence of Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6, a potentially pathogenic bacterium isolated from the conchocelis of Pyropia spp. Microbiol Resour Announce 8(3):e01569-e1618. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01569-18
Liu Q, Zhi Y, He Y, Ren Z, Chen H, Yang R (2020) Changes in phycospheric and environmental microbes associated with an outbreak of yellow spot disease on Pyropia yezoensis. Aquaculture 529:735651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735651
Luo H, Moran Mary A (2014) Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78(4):573–587. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00020-14
Luo H, Fu Y, Shi J, Xie S, Yang Y (2023) Carbon sink potential and environmental benefits of seaweed: a case study of the seaweed cultivation industry on China coast. Aquaculture 572:739494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739494
Ma Y, Li Y, Li D, Xu J (2017) Polyamines in algae: distribution, biosynthesis, metabolism and functions. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00692
Mao Y, Yang R, Ke L, Chen H, Chen J, Luo Q (2023) Using oligoagar to improve the survival of Neoporphyra haitanensis conchocelis infected by Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6. J Appl Phycol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-023-02918-z
Martin M, Portetelle D, Michel G, Vandenbol M (2014) Microorganisms living on macroalgae: diversity, interactions, and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(7):2917–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5557-2
Mcmurdie PJ, Susan H, Michael W (2013) phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8(4):e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
Mcmurdie PJ, Holmes S, Mchardy AC (2014) Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol 10(4):e1003531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531
Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T (2006) MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34(19):5623–5630. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl723
Nurnberger T, Kernmerling B (2006) Receptor protein kinases—pattern recognition receptors in plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci 11(11):519–522
Pohnert G (2004) Chemical defense strategies of marine organisms. In: Schulz S (ed) The chemistry of pheromones and other semiochemicals I. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–219
Poidevin L, Sato M, Altinoglu I, Mavromatis K, Henderson E, Gibson AL, Mandava V, Salit ML, Leslie A, Kobilinsky A, Salzberg SL, Shapiro L, Marks DS (2012) Double-strand break repair plays a role in stationary-phase survival in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06588-11
Ramanan R, Kim B-H, Cho D-H, Oh H-M, Kim H-S (2016) Algae–bacteria interactions: evolution, ecology and emerging applications. Biotechnol Adv 34(1):14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003
Scholthof K-BG (2007) The disease triangle: pathogens, the environment and society. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(2):152–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1596
Wang JJ, Dan LI, Song J, Liu YP, Chang YQ, Wang YN (2015) Structural analysis of seawater bacterial community from culture pond of Apostichopus japonicus at different periods. J Agric Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2014.382
Wang W, Wu L, Xu K, Xu Y, Ji D, Chen C, Xie C (2020a) The cultivation of Pyropia haitanensis has important impacts on the seawater microbial community. J Appl Phycol 32(4):2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02068-6
Wang X, He L, Ma Y, Huan L, Wang Y, Xia B, Wang G (2020b) Economically important red algae resources along the Chinese coast: history, status, and prospects for their utilization. Algal Res 46:101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101817
Wang J, Tang X, Mo Z, Mao Y (2022) Metagenome-assembled genomes from Pyropia haitanensis microbiome provide insights into the potential metabolic functions to the seaweed. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.857901
Ward GM, Faisan JP Jr, Cottier-Cook EJ, Gachon C, Hurtado AQ, Lim PE, Matoju I, Msuya FE, Bass D, Brodie J (2020) A review of reported seaweed diseases and pests in aquaculture in Asia. J World Aquac Soc 51(4):815–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12649
Wu H, Liu M, Zhang W, Xiao T (2014) Phylogenetic analysis of epibacterial communities on the surfaces of four red macroalgae. J Ocean Univ China 13(6):1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-014-2325-y
Xu M, Yang R, Liu Q, He Y, Chen H (2020) Yellow spot disease in Pyropia species infected by Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6. J Fish China 44(4):661–671. https://doi.org/10.11964/jfc.20190711865
Xun W, Liu Y, Li W, Ren Y, Xiong W, Xu Z, Zhang N, Miao Y, Shen Q, Zhang R (2021) Specialized metabolic functions of keystone taxa sustain soil microbiome stability. Microbiome 9(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00985-9
Yan Y-W, Yang H-C, Tang L, Li J, Mao Y-X, Mo Z-L (2019) Compositional shifts of bacterial communities associated with Pyropia yezoensis and surrounding seawater co-occurring with red rot disease. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01666
Yang R, Liu Q, He Y, Tao Z, Xu M, Luo Q, Chen J, Chen H (2020) Isolation and identification of Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6 as a pathogen associated with yellow spot disease of Pyropia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Aquaculture 526:735372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735372
Zhu F, Li C, Wang X, Zhu Z, Chen H, Yan X (2012a) Oligoagars induce defense response of Porphyra haitanensis to epiphytic bacteria. Chin J Biol Control 28(3):394–399. https://doi.org/10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2012.03.024
Zhu Z, Luo Q, Yan X, Yang R, He S, Chen H (2012b) Effects of degree of polymerization of oligoagars on inducing the defense response in Porphyra haitanensis (Rhodophyta). Acta Oceanol Sin 34(6):205–209
Zhu J, Xu M, Liu Q, Li D, Yang R, Chen H (2021) Bacteriophage therapy on the conchocelis of Pyropia haitanensis (Rhodophyta) infected by Vibrio mediterranei 117-T6. Aquaculture 531:735853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735853
This project was funded by: Zhejiang Province Nature Science Foundation of China (LY22C190002), NSFC (32373099, 32273155), Key Scientific and Technological Grant of Zhejiang for Breeding New Agricultural (Aquaculture) Varieties (2021C02069-9), Major Scientific and Technological Project of Ningbo (2021Z004, 2021Z103), Scientific and Technological Project of Ningbo (2022S208), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA, K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could affect the work reported in this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Analysis of functional structure changes in phycosphere microbial communities. Table S1. Pathogen abundance table annotated in the PHI database. Table S2. Abundance of VFGs annotated in the VFDB database.
About this article
Cite this article
Ke, L., Yang, R., Liu, Q. et al. Oligoagars and microbial agents show potential for Porphyra disease prevention. AMB Expr 13, 128 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-023-01635-7