Cinnamic acid and p-coumaric acid are metabolized to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid by Yarrowia lipolytica
AMB Express volume 13, Article number: 84 (2023)
Yarrowia lipolytica has been explored as a potential production host for flavonoid synthesis due to its high tolerance to aromatic acids and ability to supply malonyl-CoA. However, little is known about its ability to consume the precursors cinnamic and p-coumaric acid. In this study, we demonstrate that Y. lipolytica can consume these precursors through multiple pathways that are partially dependent on the cultivation medium. By monitoring the aromatic acid concentrations over time, we found that cinnamic acid is converted to p-coumaric acid. We identified potential proteins with a trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase activity in Y. lipolytica and constructed a collection of 15 knock-out strains to identify the genes responsible for the reaction. We identified YALI1_B28430g as the gene encoding for a protein that converts cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid (designated as TCM1). By comparing different media compositions we found that complex media components (casamino acids and yeast extract) induce this pathway. Additionally, we discover the conversion of p-coumaric acid to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid. Our findings provide new insight into the metabolic capabilities of Y. lipolytica and hold great potential for the future development of improved strains for flavonoid production.
Our current world economy is highly dependent on fossil fuels to produce a variety of products. Consequently, the excessive release of greenhouse gases is causing climate change and threatening the biodiversity of our planet. To move towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly economy, microbial cell factories can play a key role (Vanholme et al. 2013).
Microbial cell factories are utilized for a constantly growing number of products, from plant-derived high-value cancer medication (Courdavault et al. 2020) to bulk products like bioethanol (Robak and Balcerek 2020). Yarrowia lipolytica is an oleaginous yeast and has been engineered to produce a wide range of products, especially lipid-derived compounds. To make the production processes economically and ecologically feasible, lignocellulosic hydrolysates are used as a renewable alternative carbon and energy sources. However, those hydrolysates contain different microbial inhibitors e.g. phenolic compounds deriving from lignin such as cinnamic or p-coumaric acid (Palmqvist and Hahn-Hägerdal 2000). While a lot of research has been put into achieving tolerance to these inhibitors (Cunha et al. 2019), an even better approach would be to use them as precursors for valuable products.
Cinnamic and p-coumaric acid are the precursors for the flavonoids pinocembrin and naringenin, respectively. Both flavonoids have recently gained high interest for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory properties (Tungmunnithum et al. 2018). Naringenin and pinocembrin have both been produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Koopman et al. 2012; Tous Mohedano et al. 2023) and Escherichia coli (Leonard et al. 2007). However, flavonoid biosynthesis requires malonyl-CoA as a precursor, a metabolite with a high flux during nitrogen starvation in the oleaginous yeast Y. lipolytica. Therefore, Y. lipolytica has already been explored as a production organism for different flavonoids e.g. naringenin (Wei et al. 2020) and liquiritigenin (Akram et al. 2021). Additionally, Y. lipolytica is known for its ability to consume a wide range of carbon sources e.g. different sugars, lipids, and alkanes (Ledesma-Amaro and Nicaud 2016). It is also highly tolerant to many of the inhibitors commonly found in hydrolysates (Konzock et al. 2021).
Most of the studies on flavonoid production have focused on increasing the production titers via a push-and-pull approach by testing different homologs of the pathway enzymes and adjusting their expression levels. However, very little research has been done to investigate any side reactions that might drain precursor supplies.
In this study, we investigated Y. lipolytica’s ability to consume the aromatic acids cinnamic and p-coumaric acid. We found that Y. lipolytica can metabolize cinnamic acid through at least two different pathways, that are furthermore medium-dependent. One degradation pathway leads to the formation of p-coumaric acid. Through protein BLAST we identified 15 potential proteins with trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase activity that could catalyse this reaction. We constructed single knock-out strains of each target gene and identified YALI1_B28430g as the gene encoding the responsible protein, herein named TCM1. We further found that p-coumaric acid is further converted to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid.
Strains and strain construction
The Yarrowia lipolytica strain OKYL029 is based on the W29 background strain (Y-63,746 from the ARS Culture Collection, Peoria, USA; a.k.a. ATCC20460/ CBS7504) and was previously engineered to prevent filamentous growth by deletion of MHY1 (Konzock and Norbeck 2020) (MATa ∆ku70::Cas9::DsdA Δmhy1). Deletion strains were based on OKYL029 and constructed by removing the open reading frame of the corresponding gene using the EasyCloneYALI toolbox (Holkenbrink et al. 2018). Briefly, the target gene was targeted by two gRNAs to induce DNA double-strand breaks which were repaired by providing the cell with a 100 bp repair fragment for homologous recombination. Sequences of the gRNAs, repair fragments and validation primers can be found in the supplementary information.
Transformations were performed using a lithium acetate heat shock protocol according to EasyCloneYALI toolbox (Holkenbrink et al. 2018).
Unless differently stated, Delft media with a C/N ratio of 18 and LPU media with a C/N ratio of 200 was used.
Delft media (C/N 18) consisted of 7.5 g/L ammonium sulfate [Sigma Aldrich, 7783-20-2], 14.4 g/L potassium phosphate monobasic [Fisher Scientific, 7778-77-0], 0.5 g/L magnesium sulfate heptahydrate [Merck, 10034-99-8], 33 g/L D(+)-Glucose monohydrate [Avantor, VWR, 14431-43-7], 2 mL/L trace metals solution, 1 mL/L vitamin solution; pH adjusted to 5.5 with potassium hydroxide [Avantor, VWR, 1310-58-3] and is based on Verduyn et al. (1992).
The trace metal solution consisted of the following chemicals and their concentrations: 3 g/L Iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4*7 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 7782-63-0], 4.5 g/L Zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4*7 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 7446-20-0], 4.5 g/L Calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2*2 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 10035-04-8], 1.0 g/L Manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl2*4 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 13446-34-9], 300 mg/L Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2*6 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 7791-13-1], 300 mg/L Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4*5 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 7758-99-8], 400 mg/L Sodium molybdate dihydrate (Na2MoO4*2 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 10102-40-6, 1.0 g/L Boric acid (H3BO3) [Sigma Aldrich, 10043-35-3], 100 mg/L Potassium iodide (KI) [Sigma Aldrich, 7681-11-0], and 19 g/L Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate (Na2EDTA*2 H2O) [Sigma Aldrich, 6381-92-6].
Vitamin solution consisted of 50 mg/L d-biotin [Sigma Aldrich, 58-85-5], 1.0 g/L D-pantothenic acid hemicalcium salt [Sigma Aldrich, 137-08-6], 1.0 g/L thiamin-HCl [Sigma Aldrich, 67-03-8], 1.0 g/L pyridoxin-HCl [Sigma Aldrich, 58-56-0], 1.0 g/L nicotinic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 59-67-6], 0.2 g/L 4-aminobenzoic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 150-13-0], 25 g/L myo-Inositol [Sigma Aldrich, 87-89-8].
Lipid production media (LPU) (C/N 200) consisted of 1.5 g/L yeast extract [Merck, 8013-01-2], 0.85 g/L, casamino acids [Formedium, CAS01], 1.7 g/L Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate [Formedium, CYN0502], 5.1 g/L potassium hydrogen phthalate [Merck, 877-24-7] buffer adjusted to pH 5.5 with potassium hydroxide [Avantor, VWR, 1310-58-3], 110 g/L D(+)-Glucose monohydrate [Avantor, VWR, 14431-43-7], and 0.5 g/L urea [Sigma Aldrich, 57-13-6] (Tsakraklides et al. 2018).
Media with different nitrogen sources or C/N ratios only differ in the amount of nitrogen source and glucose added and are summarized in Table 1. Other media components were not changed. In the case of the addition of yeast extract and casamino acids to Delft media, the final concentration mimicked the concentration found in LPU media. The addition of vitamin and trace metal solution to LPU media mimicked the final concentration of Delft medium.
YPD plates contained 20 g/L peptone from meat [Merck, 91079-38-8], 10 g/L [Merck, 8013-01-2], 20 g/L D(+)-Glucose monohydrate [Avantor, VWR, 14431-43-7], and 20 g/L agar [VWR, 9002-18-0]. For selection, YPD plates were supplemented with 250 mg/L Nourseothricin [Jena Bioscience, 96736-11-7].
Growth curves to determine the tolerance to organic acids were measured with the Growth Profiler 960 (Enzyscreen B.V., Heemstede, The Netherlands) using a standard sandwich cover with pins (CR1396b). Overnight cultures were inoculated from YPD plates into 5 ml of Delft media (without any organic acid added) in 50 mL falcon tubes and cultivated at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 12 to 16 h. An Eppendorf tube with 800 µL of media was inoculated with the overnight culture to a starting OD600 of 0.05. The organic acids, trans-cinnamic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 140-10-3], trans-p-coumaric acid [TCI, 501-98-4], caffeic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 331-39-5], and trans-ferulic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 537-98-4] were added to the media from 25 mg/mL stock (in ethanol [Sigma Aldrich, 64-17-5]), and the final ethanol concentration was adjusted to 1.86% v/v for all conditions. The tube was vortexed and 150 µL were transferred to four wells of a 96-wells plate. Strains were cultivated at 30 °C and 200 rpm and pictures to determine the OD600 were taken every 30 min.
Shake flask experiments to quantify the organic acid degradation were performed in 100 mL shake flasks with 10 mL media. Cultures were inoculated to a starting OD600 of 0.05 and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm.
The small culture volumes in both, 96-well plates and shake flasks, were chosen to ensure proper aeration of the cultures.
The organic acid extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographer (HPLC) protocol is based on (Tous Mohedano et al. 2023). For the extraction of organic acids 0.5 mL of cell culture from the shake flask cultivation was mixed with 0.5 mL absolute ethanol (100%), vortexed for 5 min, and centrifuged at 4 °C and 15,000 xrf. The supernatant was transferred to glass vials and analyzed on an HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a photodiode array detector and equipped with a Discovery HS F5 150 mm x 46 mm column (particle size 5 μm; Sigma-Aldrich). Solvent A was 10 mM ammonium formate [Merck, 540-69-2] (pH 3, adjusted with formic acid [Sigma Aldrich, 64-18-6]) and solvent B was acetonitrile [Sigma Aldrich, 75-05-8]. The eluent flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. The elution gradient started with 5% solvent B (0–0.5 min), followed by a linear increase from 5 to 60% solvent B (0.5–20.5 min), another linear increase from 60 to 100% solvent B (20.5–21.5 min), maintenance at 100% solvent B for 1 min (21.5–22.5 min), a linear decrease from 100 to 5% solvent B (22.5–23.5 min), and maintenance at 5% solvent B for 0.5 min (23.5–24 min). Cinnamic acid, ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, and caffeic acid were detected at 289 nm, at retention times of 12.5, 9.75, 8.6, and 7.3 min, respectively (Figure S7). 4-hydroxybenzoic acid was detected at 6.3 min at 260 nm. Concentrations were calculated based on standard curves.
Aromatic acid tolerance is partly based on degradation
In a previous study, we observed that Y. lipolytica was highly tolerant to the aromatic acid cinnamic acid (Konzock et al. 2021). We tested the tolerance towards cinnamic acid and three additional aromatic acids, namely caffeic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acid. The four aromatic acids have a similar structure and only differ in the number and position of hydroxyl and methoxy groups. We observed a high tolerance of Y. lipolytica to all four acids up to a concentration of 2.4 mM (Fig. 1A). Although the growth was not inhibited by the addition of cinnamic acid, higher concentrations did reduce the growth, while the other three tested organic acids had little effect.
Since Y. lipolytica is known to be able to consume a wide range of carbon sources (Ledesma-Amaro and Nicaud 2016), we measured the concentration of the four aromatic acids after 24 and 48 h of cultivation (starting concentration 125 mg/L) (Fig. 1B). We found that cinnamic, p-coumaric, and caffeic acid are all substantially degraded over time. After 24 h cinnamic acid is completely degraded, while 20% and 80% of p-coumaric and caffeic acid are remaining, respectively. After 48 h about 18% of caffeic acid remain and p-coumaric acid could not be detected anymore. We did not observe any degradation of ferulic acid during the two days of cultivation. We also tested the cinnamic acid degradation in a different strain isolate (A101.1.31, a UV-mutant from wild-type strain A101 (Wojtatowicz et al. 1991) and confirmed a similar ability, indicating that it is a conserved trait and not W29 strain-specific (Figure S1).
These results indicate that Y. lipolytica’s high tolerance to aromatic acids could be partly explained by its ability to degrade these compounds.
Cinnamic acid is degraded to p-coumaric acid and further degraded to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid
Cinnamic and p-coumaric acid are flavonoid precursors and their degradation is a significant drawback for Y. lipolytica as a host organism for flavonoid production. Therefore, we investigated the degradation pathway of cinnamic and p-coumaric acid, to find a way to reduce their degradation.
We conducted a time course experiment, monitoring the growth (OD600) and concentration of cinnamic and p-coumaric acid over time. We used two media, Delft media and lipid production media (LPU) media, to see if the degradation is media-dependent. Both media have very different compositions and will lead to different phenotypes (oleaginous phenotype in LPU) and possibly gene expressions that might affect the degradation pathways. Delft media is a defined media with ammonium sulphate as a nitrogen source with a moderate carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio = 18), which is used to produce high-value compounds e.g. flavonoid (Tous Mohedano et al. 2023). LPU media uses urea as a nitrogen source, is buffered by potassium hydrogen phthalate buffer, and has a high C/N ratio (= 200) to induce lipid production. Due to the buffering and use of urea as a nitrogen source (which does not acidify the media (Konzock et al. 2022), the pH in LPU media remains stable for a longer time compared to Delft media (Figure S3).
For both media, we observed the degradation of cinnamic and p-coumaric acid (Fig. 2A). To identify the degradation products, we first conducted a literature search for known cinnamic acid pathways. In S. cerevisiae cinnamic acid can be degraded to styrene by the Ferulic acid decarboxylase Fdc1 and Phenylacrylic acid decarboxylase Pad1 (Mukai et al. 2010; Richard et al. 2015). There are no reported homologs of these genes in Y. lipolytica. Additionally, we were able to detect a styrene standard with our detection method but did not observe the corresponding peak in any of our samples.
Interestingly, in LPU media we observed the production of p-coumaric acid during cinnamic acid degradation. Based on the maximum p-coumaric acid concentration of 24 mg/L (after 12 h) in LPU media, we estimate that at least 20–25% of the cinnamic acid was degraded via this pathway, while a precise estimate is impossible since p-coumaric acid is further degraded. Since in Delft media, cinnamic acid is degraded but not yielding p-coumaric acid, this indicates that either (1) cinnamic acid can be degraded to at least two distinct products, one being p-coumaric acid and additional unknown compounds (Fig. 2B); or (2) p-coumaric acid is rapidly degraded to other products in Delft media. To answer that question, we investigated the possible p-coumaric acid degradation products. Since the conversion from cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid only requires the addition of a hydroxyl group to the aromatic ring of cinnamic acid, we hypothesized that an additional hydroxyl group at p-coumaric acid could form caffeic acid, as observed in Streptomyces species (Nambudiri et al. 1972; Sachan et al. 2006). However, our HPLC analysis did not show a peak corresponding to caffeic acid in any of the samples supplemented with p-coumaric or cinnamic acid at any time point. However, as we have shown before, caffeic acid can be further degraded and would not necessarily be accumulated.
Another degradation product of p-coumaric acid in Streptomyces species is 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) (Sutherland et al. 1983; Sachan et al. 2006). We identified an accumulation of 4-HBA over time in our samples supplemented with p-coumaric acid and those supplemented with cinnamic acid in LPU media (Fig. 2A). Based on the quantification we estimate that 50% of the supplemented p-coumaric acid is converted to 4-HBA. Additionally, we supplemented a culture with 4-HBA (125 mg/L) and found that 4-HBA is not further degraded within 5 days in either media (Figure S4).
Since 4-HBA is an accumulating product of p-coumaric acid degradation in both media but was not detected in Delft media supplemented with cinnamic acid, we concluded that in Delft media cinnamic acid is not converted to p-coumaric acid but to one or more additional products (Fig. 2).
Based on the reaction from p-coumaric acid to 4-HBA, we hypothesized that cinnamic acid could be converted by a similar reaction to benzoic acid. However, we were not able to detect a benzoic acid standard with our HPLC setup.
Overall, these results show that cinnamic acid is degraded to p-coumaric acid, which is further converted to 4-HBA, and that both, cinnamic and p-coumaric acid, are converted to additional unknown products (Fig. 2B).
Cinnamic acid degradation pathway is depending on media composition
Based on the results from our previous experiment, we aimed to further understand the influence of the different media components on the degradation pathways of both cinnamic and p-coumaric acid. We compared the influence of different nitrogen sources (ammonium sulphate [AS] and urea), different carbon/nitrogen ratios (C/N ratio), and the addition of either yeast extract and casamino acids (YaC) to Delft media or vitamin and trace metal solution (VaM) to LPU media (details in method section) on the degradation of both cinnamic and p-coumaric acid.
In all LPU media variants, cinnamic acid was degraded to p-coumaric acid and 4-HBA (Table 2). The addition of vitamins and trace metals did not inhibit this pathway to p-coumaric acid. In LPU media with a lower C/N ratio, we found some cinnamic acid left in the media, while all of it was consumed in the high C/N ratio media. Simultaneously, the cell growth (OD600) was higher in a low C/N ratio, suggesting that the difference in cinnamic acid consumption is not a result of the number of cells but of a metabolic change in the cells.
In all Delft media variants, cinnamic acid was degraded but only the addition of yeast extract and casamino acids resulted in the production of p-coumaric acid and 4-HBA. Both products were not detected in any of the other Delft-based media suggesting that the degradation pathway from cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid can be induced by the addition of complex media components. Neither the nitrogen source (AS or urea) nor the C/N ratio did change cinnamic acid degradation in Delft media.
For the degradation of p-coumaric acid, we did not find any link to the tested media components (Table S1).
Gene YALI1_B28430g encodes for a protein with a trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase activity that converts cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid
Next, we tried to identify the gene responsible for the degradation of cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. The reaction from cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid requires a trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase (EC 22.214.171.124). A suitable and well-characterized protein facilitating this reaction is C4H from Arabidopsis thaliana (gene AT2G30490) (Mizutani et al. 1997). Using a BLAST search the protein sequence of AtC4H was compared against all the predicted proteins from the genome of Y. lipolytica to find proteins that could catalyze the same reaction (details in the supplementary). We constructed single knock-out strains of 15 of 17 target genes and tested them for their ability to degrade cinnamic acid in both LPU and Delft media. The construction of knock-out strains of YALI1_C14106g and YALI1_B07094g was not successful, suggesting that they might be essential for growth. The growth of all other deletion strains was similar to the parental strain and did not display major growth defects, except for ICYL17 which reached a lower final OD600 (Figure S5).
In Delft media, all knock-out strains continued to degrade cinnamic acid (Figure S6). Similarly, in the LPU medium, all strains consumed cinnamic acid (Table 3). While the wildtype strain consumed all cinnamic acid the deletion strains showed small amounts of cinnamic acid remaining in the culture, and the amount of formed p-coumaric acid varies between 8.2 mg/L (ICYL19) and 24.2 mg/L (OKYL029). These varieties could be due to minor differences in growth as the wild type has reached a higher OD600 at the sampling point.
Importantly, one of the knock-out strains (ICYL09, ΔYALI1_B28430g) did not form any p-coumaric acid (or 4-HBA) anymore. These results show, that YALI1_B28430g encodes for a protein with a trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase activity that converts cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. We hereby suggest naming this gene TCM1. It furthermore re-confirms our previous conclusion, that a second pathway for the degradation of cinnamic acid exists in Y. lipolytica.
The growth experiments with different aromatic acids indicated that Y. lipolytica is highly tolerant toward these kinds of inhibitors as previously reported (Konzock et al. 2021). However, this previous study did not measure the aromatic acid concentrations over time and did not investigate possible degradation as the underlying cause of the high tolerance of Y. lipolytica. Our observation of aromatic acid degradation indicates that part of the tolerance could be based on this degradation. However, while Y. lipolytica completely degrades 125 mg/L cinnamic acid within 24 h, it shows a growth reduction when cultivated at higher cinnamic acid concentrations. This shows that the ability to degrade the inhibitor does not equal immunity. On the other hand, for ferulic acid we did not find degradation while simultaneously observing high tolerance, indicating that Y. lipolytica has indeed a high aromatic acid tolerance besides its ability to degrade some of these compounds.
We identified YALI1_B28430g as the gene encoding a protein with a trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase activity that converts cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. There are no specific publications linked to the gene on Uniprot exploring its function so far. Therefore, we suggest naming the gene YALI1_B28430g TCM1 according to its activity. Furthermore, our experiments with different growth media showed that TCM1-related enzyme activity is not observed in Delft media but that the addition of complex media components (yeast extract and casamino acids) can induce the TCM1-related enzyme activity.
The degradation of p-coumaric acid in Y. lipolytica has previously been observed in the context of resveratrol production which uses p-coumaric acid as a precursor (Sáez-Sáez et al. 2020). Although, the authors did not identify the degradation product they observed a reduced degradation of p-coumaric acid in a YP medium containing complex nutrients. Our experiment with different media compositions indicates that the media composition can indeed affect the degradation of p-coumaric acid. However, we observed the opposite trend, with an additional degradation pathway of cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid being induced by the addition of complex media compounds. Furthermore, the pH-buffering capacities of the media seem to affect the degradation speed of both cinnamic and p-coumaric acid (Fig. 2and Figure S3). It is likely, that both compounds are degraded intracellularly and transported through the cell membrane passively as deprotonated cations. This deprotonation is depending on the pH of the media and the pKa value of the acid (cinnamic acid 4.45, p-coumaric acid 4.65). Since the pH of Delft media is decreasing earlier compared to LPU media, both organic acids are deprotonated and transported into the cell earlier and degraded. In this context, while the nitrogen source did not affect the degradation of either compound in general (Table 2), and previous studies have shown only minor transcriptomic differences between cells cultured in urea or AS (Konzock et al. 2022), the additional acidification through AS utilisation can influence the transport and thus the degradation speed.
The identification of the gene TCM1 (YALI1_B28430g) to encode for the enzyme catalyzing the reaction from cinnamic to p-coumaric acid can be used for the development of microbial cell factories that use cinnamic acid as a precursor, e.g. pinocembrin or naringenin (Wei et al. 2020; Tous Mohedano et al. 2023). In the case of pinocembrin, a deletion of TCM1 would reduce the loss of precursor to the competing pathway, while overexpression of TCM1 could be beneficial for the production of naringenin, due to the formation of p-coumaric acid.
We have identified 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) as a degradation product of p-coumaric acid. The reaction can be catalyzed by a 4-coumarate-CoA ligase to form p-coumaroyl-CoA followed by the conversion by a 4-hydroxy benzoyl-CoA thioesterase to 4-HBA. Based on the initial concentration of p-coumaric acid and the resulting 4-HBA concentration we estimated that 50% of the p-coumaric acid is converted to 4-HBA. We conclude that at least one more degradation pathway to an unknown product exists. In Streptomyces species caffeic acid is an additional product of p-coumaric acid degradation (Sachan et al. 2006). While we did not observe any accumulation of caffeic acid in our experiments, we also found that caffeic acid itself is degraded when supplemented with the media. p-Coumaric acid may be partially converted to caffeic acid, which could in turn be further degraded.
The identification of 4-HBA as a product of p-coumaric acid in Y. lipolytica can be further explored as a sustainable production alternative. 4-HBA and its derivatives have a wide range of applications, e.g. as conservatives in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals (Lenzen et al. 2019) but also as a raw material of dyes (Kitade et al. 2018). Mainly, 4-HBA is produced via the Kolbe-Schmitt reaction which converts phenol and potassium hydroxide to potassium phenoxide, which further reacts with carbon dioxide to form 4-HBA (Lindsey and Jeskey 1957). However, since this reaction is very energy-consuming (high temperatures and pressure) more sustainable alternative production methods have been explored. For example, Burkholderia glumae has been engineered to produce a high concentration of 4-HBA from p-coumaric acid (Jung et al. 2016), while Pseudomonas taiwanensis (Lenzen et al. 2019) and Pseudomonas putida (Yu et al. 2016) have been engineered for de novo production of 4-HBA. Additionally, different yeasts have been explored to produce 4-HBA, e.g. S. cerevisiae (Averesch et al. 2017) and Pichia pastoris (Inokuma et al. 2023). Additionally, in Y. lipolytica 4-HBA has been produced and used as a precursor to producing arbutin, a cosmetic used for skin-lightening (Shang et al. 2020). However, all fungal and some of the bacterial examples rely on the heterologous expression of a chorismate pyruvate-lyase (ubiC) that converts chorismite (an intermediate of the shikimate pathway) to 4-HBA. The identification of an alternative native pathway in Y. lipolytica that uses p-coumaric acid can be further explored and used to exceed previous production titers.
In summary, we described the degradation pathways of cinnamic and p-coumaric acid in Y. lipolytica. We identified that multiple pathways exist for both acids, that p-coumaric acid is converted to 4-HBA and that the P450 protein encoded by YALI1_B28430g catalyzes the reaction of cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. These results will be essential for the development of future flavonoid production platform strains in Yarrowia lipolytica.
All raw data as well as the calculated means and standard deviation plotted in the shown figures can be found in the supplementary.
high-performance liquid chromatography
Lipid production media
- OD600 :
Optical density at 600 nm
Akram M, Rasool A, An T, Feng X, Li C (2021) Metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for liquiritigenin production. Chem Eng Sci 230:116177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.116177
Averesch NJH, Prima A, Krömer JO (2017) Enhanced production of para-hydroxybenzoic acid by genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40:1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1785-z
Courdavault V, O’Connor SE, Oudin A, Besseau S, Papon N (2020) Towards the Microbial production of plant-derived anticancer drugs. Trends Cancer 6:444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2020.02.004
Cunha JT, Romaní A, Costa CE, Sá-Correia I, Domingues L (2019) Molecular and physiological basis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to adverse lignocellulose-based process conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9478-3
Holkenbrink C, Dam MI, Kildegaard KR, Beder J, Dahlin J, Belda DD, Borodina I (2018) EasyCloneYALI: CRISPR/Cas9-based synthetic toolbox for engineering of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol J 13:1700543. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700543
Inokuma K, Miyamoto S, Morinaga K, Kobayashi Y, Kumokita R, Bamba T, Ito Y, Kondo A, Hasunuma T (2023) Direct production of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid from cellulose using cellulase-displaying Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28321
Jung D-H, Kim E-J, Jung E, Kazlauskas RJ, Choi K-Y, Kim B-G (2016) Production of p-hydroxybenzoic acid from p-coumaric acid by Burkholderia glumae BGR1. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25908
Kitade Y, Hashimoto R, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M (2018) Production of 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid by an aerobic growth-arrested Bioprocess using metabolically Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02587–e02517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02587-17
Konzock O, Norbeck J (2020) Deletion of MHY1 abolishes hyphae formation in Yarrowia lipolytica without negative effects on stress tolerance. PLoS ONE 15:e0231161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231161
Konzock O, Zaghen S, Norbeck J (2021) Tolerance of Yarrowia lipolytica to inhibitors commonly found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. BMC Microbiol 21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02126-0
Konzock O, Zaghen S, Fu J, Kerkhoven EJ (2022) Urea is a drop-in nitrogen source alternative to ammonium sulphate in Yarrowia lipolytica. iScience 25:105703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105703
Koopman F, Beekwilder J, Crimi B, van Houwelingen A, Hall RD, Bosch D, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Daran J-M (2012) De novo production of the flavonoid naringenin in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 11:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-155
Ledesma-Amaro R, Nicaud J-M (2016) Metabolic engineering for expanding the substrate range of Yarrowia lipolytica. Trends Biotechnol 34:798–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.010
Lenzen C, Wynands B, Otto M, Bolzenius J, Mennicken P, Blank LM, Wierckx N (2019) High-yield production of 4-Hydroxybenzoate from glucose or glycerol by an Engineered Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00130
Leonard E, Lim K-H, Saw P-N, Koffas MAG (2007) Engineering Central Metabolic Pathways for High-Level Flavonoid production in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3877–3886. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00200-07
Lindsey AS, Jeskey H (1957) The Kolbe-Schmitt reaction. Chem Rev 57:583–620. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr50016a001
Mizutani M, Ohta D, Sato R (1997) Lsolation of a cDNA and a genomic clone encoding cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase from Arabidopsis and its expression manner in Planta. Plant Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.3.755
Mukai N, Masaki K, Fujii T, Kawamukai M, Iefuji H (2010) PAD1 and FDC1 are essential for the decarboxylation of phenylacrylic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 109:564–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.11.011
Nambudiri AMD, Bhat JV, Rao PVS (1972) Conversion of p -coumarate into caffeate by Streptomyces nigrifaciens. Purification and properties of the hydroxylating enzyme. Biochem 130:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1300425
Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00161-3
Richard P, Viljanen K, Penttilä M (2015) Overexpression of PAD1 and FDC1 results in significant cinnamic acid decarboxylase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express 5:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-015-0103-x
Robak K, Balcerek M (2020) Current state-of-the-art in ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Microbiol Res 240:126534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126534
Sachan A, Ghosh S, Sen SK, Mitra A (2006) Co-production of caffeic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acid from p-coumaric acid by Streptomyces caeruleus MTCC 6638. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:720–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0197-1
Sáez-Sáez J, Wang G, Marella ER, Sudarsan S, Pastor MC, Borodina I (2020) Engineering the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for high-level resveratrol production. Metab Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.08.009
Shang Y, Wei W, Zhang P, Ye B-C (2020) Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for enhanced production of Arbutin. J Agric Food Chem 68:1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07151
Sutherland JB, Crawford DL, Pometto IIIAL (1983) Metabolism of cinnamic, p -coumaric, and ferulic acids by Streptomyces setonii. Can J Microbiol 29:1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.1139/m83-195
Tous Mohedano M, Mao J, Chen Y (2023) Optimization of Pinocembrin Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol 12:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00425
Tsakraklides V, Kamineni A, Consiglio AL, MacEwen K, Friedlander J, Blitzblau HG, Hamilton MA, Crabtree DV, Su A, Afshar J (2018) High-oleate yeast oil without polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1131-y
Tungmunnithum D, Thongboonyou A, Pholboon A, Yangsabai A (2018) Flavonoids and other Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal plants for Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects: an overview. Medicines 5:93. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030093
Vanholme B, Desmet T, Ronsse F, Rabaey K, Van Breusegem F, De Mey M, Soetaert W, Boerjan W (2013) Towards a carbon-negative sustainable bio-based economy. Front Plant Sci 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00174
Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080703
Wei W, Zhang P, Shang Y, Zhou Y, Ye B-C (2020) Metabolically engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for the biosynthesis of naringenin from a mixture of glucose and xylose. Bioresour Technol 314:123726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123726
Wickham H (2016) Getting started with ggplot2. In: Wickham H (ed) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 11–31
Wojtatowicz M, Rymowicz W, Kautola H (1991) Comparison of different strains of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for citric acid production from glucose hydrol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 31:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921787
Yu S, Plan MR, Winter G, Krömer JO (2016) Metabolic Engineering of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for the production of para-hydroxy Benzoic Acid. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00090
Strain A101.1.31 was kindly donated by Prof. W. Rymowicz and Prof. M. Robak from Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences.
This work was supported by the FORMAS (formas.se) grant number 2017 − 01281 to JN. This work was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no. NNF18OC0034844 and NNF22OC0079873 to YC). YC would like to acknowledge funding support from Vetenskapsrådet and Stiftelsen för internationalisering av högre utbildning och forskning.
Open access funding provided by Chalmers University of Technology.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
: Cinnamic acid degradation of strain A101.1.31. Figure S2: Tolerance to different aromatic acids by Y. lipolytica. Figure S3: Long-term stability of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid in Y. lipolytica cultures. Figure S4: pH of LPU and Delft media over time. Figure S5: Growth of the deletion strains in Delft media. Figure S6: Cinnamic acid consumption of knock-out strains in Delft media. Figure S7: HPLC chromatogram of the four aromatic acids caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic and cinnamic acid. Table S1: Influence of media composition on p-coumaric acid degradation.
About this article
Cite this article
Konzock, O., Tous-Mohedano, M., Cibin, I. et al. Cinnamic acid and p-coumaric acid are metabolized to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid by Yarrowia lipolytica. AMB Expr 13, 84 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-023-01590-3
- Phenolic compounds
- Organic acids degradation
- P450 protein