Effect of the initial pH on the anaerobic digestion process of dairy cattle manure
AMB Express volume 12, Article number: 162 (2022)
Anaerobic digestion (AD) has recently been studied to obtain products of greater interest than biogas, such as volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and phytoregulators. The effect of the initial pH of cow manure and the fermentation time of the AD on the microbial composition, VFAs, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA3) production was evaluated. The cow manure (7% solids) was adjusted to initial pH values of 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, and 8.5, and the AD products were analyzed every four days until day 20. The initial pH and the fermentation time had an important effect on the production of metabolites. During AD, only the hydrolytic and acidogenic stages were identified, and the bacteria found were from the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Spirochaetes. The most abundant genera produced in the four AD were Caproiciproducens, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Romboutsia, Paeniclostridium, Turicibacter, Peptostreptococcaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Fonticella. The highest amount of VFAs was obtained at pH 8.5, and the production of the acids was butyric > acetic > propionic. The maximum production of GA3 and IAA was at an initial pH of 6.5 on day 20 and a pH of 5.5 on day 4, respectively. There was a strong correlation (> 0.8) between the most abundant microorganisms and the production of VFAs and GA3. The anaerobic digestion of cow manure is a good alternative for the production of VFAs, GA3 and IAA.
The volume of manure generation around the world is enormous because of the increasing demand for meat/dairy products, with concomitant environmental contamination due to its inadequate disposal, but anaerobic digestion (AD) is an option for the treatment of manure (Li et al. 2021).
AD involves a sequence of chemical processes in which biodegradable organic waste is broken down by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen, which is useful for organic waste reduction, sludge stabilization, and biological toxicity reduction (Huang et al. 2019; Khatami et al. 2021). Different kinds of microorganisms participate in each of the four stages of AD: hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis (Greses et al. 2020). These microorganisms live in obligate mutualistic cooperation, and the complete performance of AD is dependent on this complex syntrophic relationship. Changes in one group can alter the chain of anaerobic sequences and, consequently, the complete AD process (Nguyen et al. 2019).
Knowledge of the microbial population in each stage, as well as their metabolic properties and interactions, is necessary to improve the performance of AD. The microorganisms and the ratios of the metabolites produced in each stage of AD can change considerably in response to the organic loading rate, type and concentration of the substrate, temperature, and pH (Sträuber et al. 2012; Khatami et al. 2021). The metabolic pathways and microorganisms involved in the methanogenic stage have been extensively studied, whereas the preceding stages are less known (Sträuber et al. 2012). Probably the most recognized product from AD is biogas; however, other metabolites from the earlier stages are also highly important, with a great variety of applications, such as volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (Pervez et al. 2022; Khatami et al. 2021; Nzeteu et al. 2021) and phytohormones (Li et al. 2016).
VFAs are short-chain aliphatic monocarboxylate compounds containing two to six carbon atoms, such as acetic, propionic, butyric, isobutyric, valeric, isovaleric, and caproic acids. VFAs are important starting materials for the production of biofuels, olefins, alcohols, ketones and biodegradable plastics (Wang et al. 2019; Khatami et al. 2021; Greses et al. 2020), and are widely used in the textile, food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries (Nzeteu et al. 2021). The current costs of butyric, acetic and propionic acids are 1500–1650, 400–400 and 2000–2500 euros/ton, respectively (Khatami et al. 2021). Currently, VFAs are produced from petroleum-derived compounds or by natural extraction methods; however, their production from more environmentally sustainable processes has attracted the attention of researchers. For example, AD is very attractive because it is cost-effective and is a way to recover value-added products from waste (Pervez et al. 2022; Khatami et al. 2021). During AD, VFAs production will be preferred if the growth of methanogens is inhibited. The substrate and methods used such as heat shock, pH increase/decrease or freeze–thaw treatments make the AD unsuitable for methanogens, with a preference for the hydrolytic and acidogenic stages (Pervez et al. 2022; Bermúdez-Penabad et al. 2017). To produce VFAs from AD, different types of organic waste have been explored, such as food (Peng et al. 2018; Zhou et al. 2018; Khatami et al. 2021), fruit (Li et al. 2022), tuna wastes (Bermúdez-Penabad et al. 2017), and sewage sludge from a wastewater treatment plant (Wang et al. 2019), and maize silage (Sträuber et al. 2012).
On the other hand, the plant hormones gibberellic acid (GA3) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) are used to stimulate the development of plants and improve the yields and quality of crops (Karishma et al. 2019). GA3 is usually produced in aerobic submerged fermentation systems by the aerobic fungus Gibberella fujikuroi and Fusarium moniliforme (Shukla et al. 2003; Oliveira et al. 2017) or by the bacteria Methylobacterium oryzae (Siddikee et al. 2010); however, the high cost of production, low GA3 yield, and high energy consumption limit extensive production of GA3 (Tian-Qiong et al. 2017). IAA is mainly produced by aerobic fermentation in axenic cultures using pure substrates (Tian-Qiong et al. 2017). Some works have shown that GA3 and IAA can also be produced during AD (Li et al. 2016); however, information regarding GA3 and IAA production under anaerobic conditions is limited.
Currently, research focused on the use of green technologies has increased steadily, the application of AD of organic waste is of particular interest, because valuable products are obtained from materials that can pollute the ecosystem and are difficult to dispose of. From the AD of cow manure were obtained important metabolites like IAA and GA3 useful in agriculture, and VFAs useful in different types of industries. The AD can be considered as a comprehensive solution to take advantage of organic residues and reduce the environmental pollution caused by them, and to produce useful metabolites from cheaper sources and eco-friendly production processes. Besides the importance of the initial pH and fermentation time during anaerobic digestion, it is important to characterize the microbial communities involved in the process, to determine their effect on the production of VFAs, IAA and GA3, and identify the conditions that maximize their production.
The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of the initial pH and fermentation time during the anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle manure on the composition of the microbial communities involved in the fermentation process, and the production of VFAs, IAA and GA3.
Materials and methods
The cow manure (total solids 14.00% of fresh matter (FM), volatile solid 11.76% FM, pH 6.55) was collected from the dairy cattle module of the Instituto Tecnológico del Altiplano de Tlaxcala, México, and the animals were fed a standard forage diet. A composite sample of ten subsamples of fresh cow manure was made. The manure sample was mixed with distilled water to a final concentration of 7% total solids and used for the AD. The pH of the diluted cow manure was 6.5, and it was adjusted to 5.5, 7.5 or 8.5 by the addition of HCl (37%) or Na2CO3.
The anaerobic digestion was carried out in 120 mL serum bottles filled with 70 mL of the mixture of manure. Nitrogen was pumped in to displace the air in the headspace of each serum bottle and ensure anaerobic conditions. Then, the bottles were capped with rubber stoppers, sealed with a metal ring and incubated at 37 °C for 20 days. A completely random design with a 4 x 6 factorial arrangement was used, with four initial pH values (5.5, 6.5, 7.5, and 8.5) and six sampling times (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 days). Every four days, three bottles from each treatment were removed and centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 20 min at 20 °C. The supernatant was filtered with 0.45 μm polypropylene filters and used to determine the pH, GA3, IAA and VFAs.
The manure was dried at 103 °C, triturated, and sieved (openings 0.25 mm). The pH, total solids, and volatile solids were determined according to standard methods (APHA 2017).
Volatile fatty acids determination
The VFAs composition was determined by gas chromatography using an Agilent 7890A chromatograph with a capillary column HP-5 (film thickness, 0.25 μm; inside diameter, 0.32 mm; length, 30 m) and a flame ionization detector (FID). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at 3 mL/min, injector and detector temperatures 250 and 260 °C, respectively. An oven temperature program was initiated at 45 °C for 1.5 min and then increased by 60 °C/min until 250 °C at this temperature for 5 min. Acetic, propionic, butyric, isobutyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids from Sigma–Aldrich were used as analytical standards (Teniza-García et al. 2015).
IAA and GA3 determination
The pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 9 with NaOH (10 N) and extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The aqueous phase was recovered, the pH was adjusted to 1.5 with HCl (37%) and then extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The organic phase was evaporated at room temperature in a fume hood, and the residue was resuspended in a mixture of water–methanol (1:1) and acetic acid (0.2%), and filtered with a 0.22 μm nylon membrane (Ludwig-Müller and Cohen 2002). The quantification of IAA and GA3 was performed using a DAD-HPLC (Hewlett Packard) equipped with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm ID × 250 mm × 5 μm) coupled to a Guard column Zorbax Reliance Cartridge (4.6 mm ID × 12.5 mm × 5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of water (A), methanol (B), and water–methanol (1:1, v/v) with 0.2% acetic acid (C). The elution program was as follows: 50% C, A from 50 to 25% (0 to 20 min), and B from 0 to 25% (0 to 20 min); then, from 20 to 27 min 50% C, 25% A and 25% B, flow rate 1 mL/min, injection volume 20 µL and column temperature 25 °C. IAA and GA3 were detected at 208 nm and 215 nm, respectively. To quantify IAA and GA3, calibration curves were developed using the corresponding IAA and GA3 analytical standards (Sigma–Aldrich).
Metagenomic analysis of anaerobic digestion processes
DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing
The digested samples at 0, 4, 8, and 20 days of each treatment were centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 20 min, and the cell biomass was dried at 60 °C for 5 h. The DNA was extracted from the mixture using the Power Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.). The quality of the DNA extracted was determined by the 260/280 spectrophotometric ratio, and the DNA concentration was adjusted to 50 ng/mL.
The library was prepared by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene using the PCR primers 515/806 and the HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, USA). The amplification program was as follows: one cycle of 94 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 6 min. Library preparation and amplicon sequencing were performed at MR DNA Laboratory (Shallowater TX USA) using a PGM Ion Torrent sequencer.
The sequencing data were analyzed on the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME 2) (Bolyen et al. 2019) bioinformatic analysis platform and Cutadapt software. A total of 1,396,023 reads (raw) of approximately 300 bp were obtained, corresponding to the 13 sequenced samples.
Sequences greater than 300 bp and less than 295 bp were eliminated using Cutadapt software and then demultiplexed, and the primers were removed using QIIME 2. Then, sequences longer than 255 bp and shorter than 250 bp were eliminated. The remaining sequences were trimmed at the 5′ end, removing the first 20 bp using Cutadapt software. Subsequently, a quality filtering step was performed in QIIME 2 using a minimum quality score of 20 (Phred) and a tolerance of 3 consecutive bp with a quality of less than 20 before truncating a sequence. Finally, the chimeric sequences were eliminated, and the sequences with 100% similarity were grouped (formation of the ASVs) using the DADA2 algorithm included in QIIME 2.
The taxonomic assignation of the sequences of each sample was performed using a naive Bayes classifier trained on the SILVA 132 database (silva_132_99_16S) (Quast et al. 2013) for the 515F/806R primer pair.
The results were analyzed with the factorial procedure ANOVA, and the differences between means were estimated using Tukey’s test at a significance level of 5%. Pearson correlation analysis of VFAs, IAA, and GA3 concentrations and the relative abundance of taxa at the genus level were conducted using RStudio (version 1.2.5033) software.
Microbial community analysis
From among the expected products of the AD, VFAs were detected, but methane was not produced in any of the four AD, and thus only the hydrolytic and acidogenic processes were working in our experiments (Sträuber et al. 2012; Zhou et al. 2018). From the beginning of the AD, an incremental decrease in pH was observed, from 8.5 to 5.86, 7.5 to 5.58, 6.5 to 5.34, and 5.5 to 5.05, and after the 4th day, the pH values remained almost constant until the end of digestion (20 days), indicating the predominance of the acidogenic stage.
The microbiome was dominated by the domain Bacteria (99.97%) with a small quantity of Archaea (0.03%). The taxa at the phylum level were Firmicutes (70–91%), Bacteroidetes (7–24%), and Actinobacteria (1–8%) (Fig. 1a), and these results are similar to those of other studies (Theuerl et al. 2020; Peng et al. 2018).
The population of Firmicutes increased continuously during the 20 days of the four digestions (Fig. 1a) and was the most abundant phylum. The pattern of this increase was similar among the four processes; Firmicutes include hydrolytic and acidogenic bacteria (Theuerl et al. 2020; Greses et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022; Khatami et al. 2021). Bacteroidetes are related to hydrolytic and acidogenic steps (Greses et al. 2020), but the conditions of the four AD tested were not favorable for their growth, and a diminution of the population throughout the entire AD process was observed. The abundance of Actinobacteria increased significantly during the first four days and then decreased appreciably until the end of digestion (Fig. 1a). Actinobacteria are hydrolytic bacteria and their abundance was related to the hydrolytic stage of the four AD.
During the first days of digestion, the hydrolytic stage was the main process of AD. In the four AD from 0–4 days, the most abundant genera were Bifidobacterium > Treponema 2 > Prevotellaceae YAB2003 group > Prevotella 1 > Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella 1, Prevotellaceae YAB2003 group, Bifidobacterium, and Treponema 2, which then diminished until the end of the fermentation (Fig. 1b). It could be considered that those microorganisms were mainly hydrolytic.
The most abundant genera present during the AD were Romboutsia, Turicibacter, Peptostreptococcaceae, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Paeniclostridium, Ruminococcaceae, Fonticella and Caproiciproducens, which belong to the Firmicutes phylum (Fig. 1c, Fig. S1 and Table S1, supplementary material). The initial pH of the AD and the fermentation time influenced the microbial population: the relative abundance of Romboutsia and Paeniclostridium were the highest and they remained constant during the four digestions. Clostridium sensu stricto 1 increased until 20 days at pH 5.5, 7.5 and 8.5, and its highest abundance was at pH 8.5. Fonticella was not detected at the beginning of fermentation; however, at pH 6.5 and 7.5 at 20 days, its abundance increased, whereas at pH 5.5 and 8.5 at 20 days, its abundance decreased appreciably. Ruminococcaceae was higher at 8 days and pH 6.5; by 20 days, its population had diminished approximately by 50%, whereas at pH 8.5, its population was negligible at 20 days. For Caproiciproducens, its abundance was negligible at the beginning of the fermentation but it increased with time, and its highest abundance was at pH 5.5, 20 days. The abundance of Turicibacter was increased at 20 days for all the AD studied, but at pH 5.5, it was the highest.
Production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and their correlation with microbial communities
During the four digestions of cow manure (CM), the maximum production of VFAs was detected at 12 days (initial pH 5.5, 6.5, 7.5) and 8 days (initial pH 8.5), whereas the total production of AD was 653.3, 609.26, 836.5 and 1150.71 mg/L at pH 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, and 8.5, respectively (Fig. 2). The pH of the CM (7% total solids) was 6.5, but the previous treatment of the CM, acidic or alkaline, stimulated the production of VFAs. The VFAs production during acid fermentation, pH 5.5, was 7.3% higher than the production from untreated CM; however, with alkaline treatment, the production was substantially improved, 37% at pH 7.5 and 89% at pH 8.5.
Acetic (Hac), propionic (Hpro), butyric (Hbut), isobutyric (Hibut), valeric (Hval), and isovaleric acids (Hival) were produced in all four digestions (Fig. 2), and the greatest production was butyric > acetic > propionic . The highest production of each acid was different depending on the pH: 73.85 mg/L Hac (pH 7.5, 12 days), 106.73 mg/L Hpro (pH 8.5, 8 days), 114.53 mg/L Hbut, 17.73 mg/L Hibut, 24.4 mg/L Hival, and 27.55 mg/L Hval, all at pH 8.5, 12 days. These results agreed with Nzeteu et al. (2021) and Khatami et al. (2021). The proportions of the produced acids HBut:HAc:HPro:HVal:Hibut:Hival were also influenced by the initial pH, and the ratios were 41:27:15:5:9:3 (pH 5.5), 46:20:21:5:4:4 (pH 6.5), 35:33:14:5:6 (pH 7.5), and 37:23:17:6:7:8 (pH 8.5).
The possible relationships between the most abundant microbial communities and VFAs production in the four ADs were studied using Pearson correlations (Table S2, supplementary material). The production of Hac was highly correlated (> 0.8) with Caproiciproducens (at all pH values), Fonticella (except pH 7.5), Ruminococcaceae (except pH 6.5 and 7.5), and Turicibacter (only at basic pH values). The correlation between Hpro, Hbut, Hibut, Hval and Hival was > 0.8 with Turicibacter (except with Hpro, pH 5.5); Caproiciproducens (except at pH 6.5); Fonticella (except Hpro and Hibut, pH 5.5); Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (except Hpro, pH 5.5); Romboutsia (except Hpro and Hibut, pH 5.5); Peptostreptococcaceae (except Hpro and Hibut, pH 5.5; Hpro and Hbut, pH 6.5, and all VFAs at pH 8.5); and Paeniclostridium only showed a correlation with VFAs at pH 7.5.
Production of phytohormones and their correlation with microbial communities
During AD, the phytohormones GA3 and IAA were detected, and the amount was determined by the initial pH and the time of digestion. The highest and most continuous production of GA3 was observed at pH 6.5, and the highest concentration was 86.83 mg/L at 20 days (Table 1); at pH 5.5, the production was constant throughout the fermentation, but it was approximately 50% lower than that at pH 6.5. At initial pH values of 7.5 and 8.5, the maximum production of GA3 was reached at 4 days and 8 days, respectively, and then diminished until the end of the process (Castro-Ramos et al. 2021). The maximum production of IAA was detected at initial pH value of 5.5 and a small concentration of IAA at pH 6.5. The highest concentration of IAA was 4.9 mg/L at 4 days and pH 5.5 (Table 1), then a decrease was observed and again an increase at 20 days.
The anaerobic production of GA3 and IAA have been scarcely studied. Li et al. (2016) reported the production of GA3 in the anaerobic digestion, and detected GA3 during the AD of pig, dairy, and chicken manure, obtaining a maximum of 47.18 mg/L at 14 days from pig manure. The same authors (Li et al. 2016) found that IAA production started with a rapid increase at 8 days, and its highest production was 23.18, 23.41, and 13.30 mg/L with dairy, pig and chicken manure, respectively. Scaglia et al. (2017) reported that in AD of pig manure mixed with different organic wastes, after 55, 35, and 40 days, the IAA was 0.84, 3.24, and 3.23 mg/L, respectively. Scaglia et al. (2015) reported 9.94 mg/L of IAA in the neutral hydrophobic fraction of digested pig slurry.
There was a correlation > 0.87 between the production of GA3 at pH 5.5 and 6.5 and the genera Caproiciproducens, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Romboutsia, Fonticella and Paeniclostridium, in addition to the genera Turicibacter and Peptostreptococcaceae at pH 6.5 (Table S1, supplementary material). Figure 3 shows that the production pattern of GA3 and the relative abundance of the mentioned genera were very similar, and those genera are probably GA3 producers. In the case of IAA, there was not a strong correlation with any of the genera identified; to identify IAA producers, more studies need to be performed.
The AD of dairy cow manure with an initial pH 6.5 and adjusted to pH 5.5, 7.5, and 8.5, only involved the hydrolytic and acidogenic steps. Methane was not produced in any of the four AD due to the methanogenic bacteria are inhibited at pH lower than 6.6 (Teniza-García et al. 2015). Besides, the taxonomic assignment revealed that the relative abundance of archaea (methanogens) in all AD was lower than 0.33%, which was less than the relative archaea abundance of 4.2% necessary in an AD-producing methane process (Pore et al. 2016).
The pH had an important effect on the composition of the bacterial community of the four AD (Additional file 1: Table S1) (Huang et al. 2018). In this way, some of the genera detected in the cow manure diminished during the four AD, and some disappeared only at the end, whereas others were not detected initially, but their abundance increased during the AD (Additional file 1: Table S1). The pH also was very important for the surveillance of the microorganisms; at pH 5.5, the populations were the lowest in the four digestions, and Prevotellaceae YAB2003 group and Prevotella 1 were not detected. At pH 6.5, the highest abundance was for Bifidobacterium; at pH 7.5, the highest abundance was for Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae YAB2003; whereas the highest abundance was for Prevotella 1 and Treponema 2 at pH 8.5. Lachnospiraceae was able to efficiently degrade cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, and protein (Peng et al. 2018; Suksong et al. 2019). Duarte et al. (2017) found that Prevotella was dominant in the rumen microbiota, whereas Prevotellaceae produces cellulolytic enzymes, Bifidobacterium is a strong carbohydrate degrader (Nguyen et al. 2019; Pokusaeva et al. 2011), and Treponema is a hemicellulose degrader (Li et al. 2022).
The metabolic activity of the microbial community was different because different acidogenic pathways were strongly influenced by the initial pH (Jomnonkhaow et al. 2021). To maximize VFAs production, it is advisable to pretreat the cow manure to carry out AD at an initial pH of 8.5 or higher, which will maximize the economic advantages in the production of VFAs. Alkaline pretreatment constitutes a cheap and attractive alternative to maximize VFAs production. Several previous works also concluded that there was greater production of VFAs at alkaline pH (Huang et al. 2019, 2018; Bermúdez-Penabad et al. 2017; Khatami et al. 2021), probably because the hydrolysis of proteins and carbohydrates was favored, as well as the higher solubilization of the materials that occurs at basic pH compared to acidic pH (Lin and Li, 2018; Yuan et al. 2019). The anaerobic digestion of cow manure was shown to be an excellent alternative to the disposal of such material and the production of VFAs, products with a high economic relevance, was feasible.
All the microorganisms highly correlated with the production of VFAs were from the phylum Firmicutes (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), in agreement with Khatami et al. (2021). The genera Peptostreptococcaceae, Clostridium, Caproiciproducens, Ruminococcaceae, Romboutsia, Clostridium sensu stricto, and Fonticella have been reported to be VFAs producers (Wang et al. 2018, 2020; Khatami et al. 2021; Nzeteu et al. 2021; Li et al. 2022).
The GA3 and IAA amount was determined by the initial pH and the time of digestion. The highest production of GA3 during AD was reached at an initial pH of 6.5 for 16 days, while IAA production was favorable during AD at an initial pH of 5.5 for 4 days. There was a strong correlation between some genera from the phylum Firmicutes and VFAs and GA3 production, whereas no relationship was found with IAA production. To our knowledge, there are very few works where any of the bacterial genera studied in this work have been related to the production of GA3 and/or IAA. Dai et al. (2021) mentioned that IAA was positively correlated with Romboutsia, Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus torques group. Peptostreptococcaceae (Younge et al. 2019) and Turicibacter (Yu et al. 2019) were reported to be correlated with IAA production.
In conclusion, anaerobic digestion of cow manure is an alternative to produce valuable products, as volatile fatty acids, gibberellic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid. The initial pH of the anaerobic digestion and the fermentation time had an important and different effect in the production of these products. The maximum amount of volatile fatty acids was achieved at an initial pH of 8.5, the main volatile fatty acid produced in all digestions was butyric acid, followed by acetic and propionic acids. For the highest production of gibberellic acid, it is recommended to carry out the anaerobic digestion at an initial pH of 6.5 for 16 days; while to produce the highest quantity of indole-3-acetic acid, it is suitable to perform the anaerobic digestion at an initial pH of 5.5 for 4 days.
Availability of data and materials
Ion PGM sequencing data is in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database SUB11548967, Bioproject PRJNA844385.
APHA (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC
Bermúdez-Penabad N, Kennes C, Veiga MC (2017) Anaerobic digestion of tuna waste for the production of volatile fatty acids. Waste Manag 68:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.010
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ et al (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
Castro-Ramos JJ, Castro-Rivera R, Solís-Oba MM, Osorio-Cortes G, Romero-Rodríguez A, Juárez-Rangel AP (2021) Perenial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) yield as a response to fitoregulators produced in digestates. Agroproductividad. 14(2):3–8
Dai G, Chen X, He Y (2021) The gut microbiota activates AhR through the tryptophan metabolite Kyn to mediate renal cell carcinoma metastasis. Front Nutr 8:712327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.712327
Duarte AC, Holman DB, Alexander TW, Durmic Z, Vercoe PE, Chaves AV (2017) The type of forage substrate preparation included as substrate in a RUSITEC system affects the ruminal microbiota and fermentation characteristics. Front Microbiol 8:704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00704
Greses S, Tomás-Pejó E, Gónzalez-Fernández C (2020) Agroindustrial waste as a resource for volatile fatty acids production via anaerobic fermentation. Bioresour Technol 297:122486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122486
Huang L, Chen Z, Xiong D, Wen Q, Ji Y (2018) Oriented acidification of wasted activated sludge (WAS) focused on odd-carbon volatile fatty acid (VFA): regulation strategy and microbial community dynamics. Water Res 142:256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.062
Huang X, Zhao J, Xu Q, Li X, Wang D, Yang Q, Liu Y, Tao Z (2019) Enhanced volatile fatty acids production from waste activated sludge anaerobic fermentation by adding tofu residue. Bioresour Technol 274:430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.010
Jomnonkhaow U, Uwineza C, Mahboubi A, Wainaina S, Reungsang A, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) Membrane bioreactor-assisted volatile fatty acids production and in situ recovery from cow manure. Bioresour Technol 321:124456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124456
Karishma S, Arya MS, Reshma UR, Anaswara SJ, Thampi SS (2019) Impact of plant growth regulators on fruit production. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 8:800–814. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.092
Khatami K, Atasoy M, Ludtke M, Baresel C, Eyice O, Cetecioglu Z (2021) Bioconversion of food waste to volatile fatty acids: impact of microbial community, pH and retention time. Chemosphere. 275:129981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129981
Li X, Guo J, Pang C, Dong R (2016) Anaerobic digestion and storage influence availability of plant hormones in livestock slurry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00586
Li Y, Zhao J, Krooneman J, Jan G, Euverink W (2021) Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Sci Total Environ 755:142940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142940
Li B-Y, Xia Z-Y, Gou M, Sun Z-Y, Huang Y-L, Jiao S-B, Dai W-Y, Tang Y-Q (2022) Production of volatile fatty acid from fruit waste by anaerobic digestion at high organic loading rates: performance and microbial community characteristics. Bioresour Technol 346:126648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126648
Lin L, Li X (2018) Effects of pH adjustment on the hydrolysis of Al-enhanced primary sedimentation sludge for volatile fatty acid production. Chem Eng J 346:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2018.04.005
Ludwig-Müller J, Cohen JD (2002) Identification and quantification of three active auxins in different tissues of Tropaeolum majus. Physiol Plant 115:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150220.x
Nguyen LN, Nguyen AQ, Johir MAH, Guo W, Ngo HH, Chaves AV, Nghiem LD (2019) Application of rumen and anaerobic sludge microbes for bio harvesting from lignocellulosic biomass. Chemosphere 228:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.159
Nzeteu C, Joyce A, Thorn C, McDonnell K, Shirran S, O’Flaherty V, Abram F (2021) Resource recovery from the anaerobic digestion of food waste is underpinned by cross-kingdom microbial activities. Bioresour Technol Rep 16:100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100847
Oliveira J, Rodrigues C, Vandenberghe LPS, Camara MC, Libardi N, Soccol CR (2017) Gibberellic acid production by different fermentation systems using citric pulp as substrate/support. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5191046
Peng X, Zhang S, Li L, Zhao X, Ma Y, Shi D (2018) Long-term high-solids anaerobic digestion of food waste: effects of ammonia on process performance and microbial community. Bioresour Technol 262:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.076
Pervez MN, Bilgiç B, Mahboubi A, Uwineza C, Zarra T, Belgiorno V, Naddeo V, Taherzadeh MJ (2022) Double-stage membrane-assisted anaerobic digestion process intensification for production and recovery of volatile fatty acids from food waste. Sci Total Environ 825:154084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154084
Pokusaeva K, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D (2011) Carbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacteria. Genes Nutr 6:285–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-010-0206-6
Pore SD, Shetty D, Arora P, Maheshwari S, Dhakephalkar PK (2016) Metagenome changes in the biogas producing community during anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Biores Technol 213:50–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.045
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl Acids Res 41:D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219
Scaglia B, Pognani M, Adani F (2015) Evaluation of hormone-like activity of the dissolved organic matter fraction (DOM) of compost and digestate. Sci Total Environ 514:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.009
Scaglia B, Pognani M, Adani F (2017) The anaerobic digestion process capability to produce biostimulant: the case study of the dissolved organic matter (DOM) vs auxin-like property. Sci Total Environ 589:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.223
Shukla R, Srivastava AK, Chand S (2003) Bioprocess strategies and recovery process in gibberellic acid fermention. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 8:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949216
Siddikee MA, Hamayun M, Han GH, Sa T (2010) Optimization of gibberellic acid production by Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 43:522–527
Sträuber H, Schröder M, Kleinsteuber S (2012) Metabolic and microbial community dynamics during the hydrolytic and acidogenic fermentation in a leach-bed process. Energ Sustain Soc 2:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-2-13
Suksong W, Kongjan P, Prasertsan P, O-Thong S (2019) Thermotolerant cellulolytic Clostridiaceae and Lachnospiraceae rich consortium enhanced biogas production from oil palm empty fruit bunches by solid-state anaerobic digestion. Biores Technol 291:121851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121851
Teniza-García O, Solís-Oba MM, Pérez-López ME, González-Prieto JM, Valencia-Vázquez R (2015) Producción de metano utilizando residuos cunícolas. Rev Mex Ing Quim 14:321–334
Theuerl S, Klang J, Hülsemann B, Mächtig T, Hassa J (2020) Microbiome diversity and community-level change points within manure-based small biogas plants. Microorganisms 8:1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081169
Tian-Qiong S, Hui P, Si-Yu Z, Rong-Yu J, Kun S, He H, Xiao-Jun J (2017) Microbial production of plant hormones: opportunities and challenges. Bioengineered 8:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2016.1212138
Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhu L, Xu Y, Liu N, Sun X, Hu L, Huang H, Wei K, Zhu R (2018) Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in goats at different ages and health states. Front Microbiol 9:2509. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02509
Wang D, Huang Y, Xu Q, Liu X, Yang Q, Li X (2019) Free ammonia aids ultrasound pretreatment to enhance short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 275:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.055
Wang Q, Zhang P, Bao S, Liang J, Wu Y, Chen N, Wang S, Cai Y (2020) Chain elongation performances with anaerobic fermentation liquid from sewage sludge with high total solid as electron acceptor. Bioresour Technol 306:123188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123188
Younge NE, Newgard CB, Cotten CM, Goldberg RN, Muehlbauer MJ, Bain JR, Stevens RD, O’Connell TM, Rawls JF, Seed PC, Ashley PL (2019) Disrupted maturation of the microbiota and metabolome among extremely preterm infants with postnatal growth failure. Sci Rep 9:8167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44547-y
Yu M, Li Z, Chen W, Rong T, Wang G, Ma X (2019) Microbiome-metabolomic analysis investigating the impacts of dietary starch types on the composition and metabolism of colonic microbiota in finishing pigs. Front Microbiol 10:1143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01143
Yuan Y, Hu X, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Wang D (2019) Advances in enhanced volatile fatty acid production from anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge. Sci Total Environ 694:133741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133741
Zhou M, Yan B, Wong JWC, Zhang Y (2018) Enhanced volatile fatty acids production from anaerobic fermentation of food waste: a mini-review focusing on acidogenic metabolic pathway. Bioresour Technol 248:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.121
To the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for the scholarship to the first author
This study was funded by Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado del Instituto Politécnico Nacional Grant number 2096.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors have declared that the Ethical Statement is not applicable in the current manuscript.
Consent for publication
All listed authors have read the manuscript and agreed to the publication of this research.
The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Microorganism relative abundance of the cow manure anaerobic digestion. Table S2. Pearson correlations between genera and volatile fatty acids, IAA and GA3 at initial pH values of 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, and 8.5. Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of the most abundant genera found in the four digestions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro-Ramos, J.J., Solís-Oba, A., Solís-Oba, M. et al. Effect of the initial pH on the anaerobic digestion process of dairy cattle manure. AMB Expr 12, 162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01486-8