Skip to main content

Construction of a mApple-D6A3-mediated biosensor for detection of heavy metal ions

Abstract

Pollution of heavy metals in agricultural environments is a growing problem to the health of the world’s human population. Green, low-cost, and efficient detection methods can help control such pollution. In this study, a protein biosensor, mApple-D6A3, was built from rice-derived Cd2+-binding protein D6A3 fused with the red fluorescent protein mApple at the N-terminus to detect the contents of heavy metals. Fluorescence intensity of mApple fused with D6A3 indicated the biosensor’s sensitivity to metal ions and its intensity was more stable under alkaline conditions. mApple-D6A3 was most sensitive to Cu2+, then Ni2+, then Cd2+. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments demonstrated that mApple-D6A3 successfully bound to each of these three metal ions, and its ability to bind the ions was, from strongest to weakest, Cu2+  > Cd2+  > Ni2+. There were strong linear relationships between the fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 and concentrations of Cd2+ (0–100 μM), Cu2+ (0–60 μM) and Ni2+ (0–120 μM), and their respective R2 values were 0.994, 0.973 and 0.973. When mApple-D6A3 was applied to detect concentrations of heavy metal ions in water (0–0.1 mM) or culture medium (0–1 mM), its accuracy for detection attained more than 80%. This study demonstrates the potential of this biosensor as a tool for detection of heavy metal ions.

Key points

  1. 1.

    A protein biosensor for detecting heavy metals was constructed.

  2. 2.

    Linear correlation was observed between fluorescence intensity and ion concentration.

  3. 3.

    The accuracy for detection heavy metals in liquid samples attained more than 80%.

Introduction

Pollution by heavy metals, such as Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, As2+, Cr2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+, in some agricultural soils in the world is a serious issue (Duan and Tan 2013; Li et al. 2014, 2020). Crops, especially rice, grown in these soils are of particular concern because they can cause great harm to the health of the animals, including humans, that consume the products from these crops (Brewer 2015; Zhai and Shang 2007). When excessively accumulated in the body, heavy metals will irreversibly chelate enzymic proteins and destroy the normal functions of enzymes, thus causing damage to immune, metabolic and reproductive systems, and in severe cases, directly causing death (Abu-El-Zahab et al. 2019; Ommati et al. 2019). Besides these toxicities negatively affecting human health, disposal of food due to metal contamination results in great losses to national economies (Li et al. 2017; Rajeshkumar et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2018).

The detection of heavy metals in agricultural environments is the first step to ensuring health and safety in relation to the human diet. Rapid and effective detection of different heavy metal ions is the key to control such pollution. Biosensors for heavy metal detection can provide more rapid and effective advantages of high selectivity and sensitivity, low cost and fast analysis. These advantages can overcome the disadvantages of traditional detection methods, such as spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy and atomic absorption spectroscopy (Deng et al. 2019; Jia et al. 2020; Khodadadi et al. 2019). Biosensors are biological molecules that function by converting reaction signals into detectable signals, and these sensitive molecules act as both signal receivers and converters (Wang et al. 2019). Enzymic proteins, microorganisms, cells, tissues, etc. can act as the sensitive molecules (Mehta et al. 2016).

At present, the many studies on biosensors have primarily focused on microbial cell-based biosensors (Xu et al. 2013). Moreover, according to Yoon’s study, the selectivity of whole-cell bioreporters (WCBs) should be modulated, because the selectivity and sensitivity of these biosensors vary depending on the nature of their promoters and regulatory proteins (Yoon et al. 2018). Unfortunately, because most of the WCBs used in past studies have been genetically modified strains of microbes, they are limited to laboratories or specific environments, where many heavy-metal polluted areas may not be as tenable for application of these WCBs. Therefore, new forms of biosensors need to be developed, and protein sensors that are independent of extracellular cells have emerged at the historic moment.

A variety of potential biosensors for the detection of heavy metal ions are metal-binding proteins that are rich in histidine and L-cysteine amino acids, which help form the protein chelates with metal ions, and have strong affinity for some heavy metals, such as Cd2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ (Tan and Schirmer 2017). Furthermore, with the discovery of the green fluorescent protein in 1962 (Prasher DC11992), fluorescence application in biosensor technology has attracted more attention in current research. In 2019, Lee et al. (2019) constructed a new biosensor by inserting metal-binding loops (MBLs) into a loop region of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) to render the eGFP inactive. When exposed to Cd2+ and Hg2+, the conformation of their recombinant protein changed and consequently, restored the original activity of the eGFP. The concentrations of Cd2+ and Hg2+ in artificially metal-amended soil and water samples were successfully quantified in the low range of 0–5 μΜ by this novel biosensor, and the accuracy of detection achieved more than 80% for each metal. An Escherichia coli sensor harboring eGFP-MBLs could also detect Cd2+ and Hg2+ in the range of 0–5 μΜ (Kim et al. 2019). Nearly at the same time, another fluorescence-backed biosensor was reported by Soleja et al. 2019. A periplasmic mercury-binding protein, MerP, was designed to be expressed while located between two mutants of the green fluorescent protein to obtain a recombinant protein MerFS for detecting the concentration of Hg2+ with high sensitivity and selectivity. Additionally, they constructed a mutant of MerFS, MerFS-51, that lowered the detection limit of Hg2+ from 0.210 µM to 1.196 µM. They also reported that MerFS-51 could also detect the intracellular Hg2+ concentrations of Escherichia coli, yeast and human embryonic kidney (HEK) − 293 T cells.

In this study, we developed a new biosensor consisting of a metal-binding protein and a fluorescence protein to detect Cd2+ and other common heavy metals found in agricultural soils and crops. The rice-derived cadmium-binding protein D6A3, which was first identified by our laboratory (Yu et al. 2018), was directly fused with the red fluorescent protein mApple to construct a new biosensor named mApple-D6A3. To determine its efficacy as a biosensor, we first confirmed that mApple-D6A3 fluorescence intensity was linearly correlated with the concentrations of Cu2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ and observed how variable pH affected intensity. The accuracy of our biosensor in detection of heavy metal ions in artificially amended water or LB medium was more than 80%. Our results demonstrate how a protein biosensor constructed with a fluorescent protein can be effectively applied to detect heavy metal ions in liquid samples.

Materials and methods

Materials

Taq DNA Polymerase and Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase for PCRs were purchased from Vazyme (Nanjing, China). T4 Ligase and restriction endonucleases were bought from TaKaRa (Tokyo, Japan). Plasmid miniprep and DNA gel extraction kits were provided by Axygen (Union City, CA, USA). A nickel-packed column was obtained from General Electric Company (Boston, MA, USA). The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit was obtained from ComWin Biotech (Beijing, China), and the E. coli BL21 (DE3) and TOP10 competent cells were from the same company. Analytical reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. (Beijing, China). Luria–Bertani medium was composed of (L−1) 10.0 g NaCl, 5.0 g yeast extract, and 10.0 g peptone, with the pH adjusted to 7.0 with NaOH (5 M); solid LB medium was supplied with 1.5% agar. All strains in this study were cultured at 37° C and agitated at 200 rpm.

Construction of engineered plasmids and strains

Four plasmids were constructed and their sequencing information are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The function and origin of these metal-binding proteins is described in the results section. Overlap PCR (Horton et al. 1989) was used to amplify the complete fragments of mApple-CadR (with primers mApple-F and CadR-R [HindIII]), mApple-D6A3 (mApple-F and D6A3-R), mApple-CapB (mApple-F and CapB-R) and mApple-MT (mApple-F and MT-R [HindIII)]. Additional file 1: Table S2 contains the primer information for the PCRs and overlap PCRs. Between fluorescent protein and metal-binding protein coding sequences were two glycine-linked peptides with the codons GGG GGA. After obtaining the correct-sized fragments, mApple-CadR, mApple-D6A3, mApple-CapB and mApple-MT were ligated into the plasmid pET30a (+) at the sites of EcoRI (5') and HindIII (3') to obtain recombinant plasmids pET30a-mApple-CadR, pET30a-mApple-D6A3, pET30a-mApple-CapB and pET30a-mApple-MT (Additional file 1: Table S3). Each recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells according to a standard heat shock method (Mandel and Higa 1970). We used the method of inducing expression and purification of the recombinant protein described by (Yan et al. 2018).

Detection of stability of fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 at different pH values

The partially purified protein mApple-D6A3 was diluted with deionized water to 0.5 mg/mL. The buffers with different pH values were disodium hydrogen phosphate-citric acid buffer (pH 2.2–8.0) and sodium carbonate-sodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 9.16–10.57). We successively added 100 μL each of the protein solution and then different pH buffers into a 96-well microplate, and left it at room temperature for 5 and 20 min. A SpectraMAX M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) was used to detect excitation light at a wavelength of 568 nm and emission light at a wavelength of 592 nm. The software used for data processing and analysis was Origin 8.0 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

Detection of metal ions by mApple and mApple-D6A3

The divalent metal ions CuCl2, NiCl2, CdCl2, CaCl2, MgCl2, MnCl2 and BaCl2 were separately dissolved with deionized water to mother liquor concentrations of 10 mM. The proteins, mApple-D6A3 and mApple, were separately diluted to 0.5 mg/mL with 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4). One hundred microliters of each metal ion solution and deionized water without metal ions (control) were transferred into three wells of a microplate for each solution. Then 100 μL of the two protein solutions were separately added into their own set of each of the metal ion solutions and control in the plate. The plate was left at room temperature for 15 min to measure the fluorescence intensity of the mixed solutions.

Evaluation of binding ability of mApple-D6A3 to metal ions

The binding ability of mApple-D6A3 to metal ions was evaluated by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The measurements were conducted on a Micro 200 (General Electric Company, USA) with a 300 μL sample cell at 25 ℃. The protein mApple-D6A3 was dialyzed to 40 μM against deionized water and introduced into the sample cell. For binding assays, cells containing the protein or the control (deionized water) were separately titrated with 700 μM of each ion Cu2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ dissolved in deionized water. No precipitate was produced during the titration. Data were analyzed with the Microcal Origin software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

Measurement of mApple-D6A3 fluorescence intensity in relation to heavy metal ion concentrations

The partially purified mApple-D6A3 was diluted to 0.5 mg/mL with 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4) buffer. Stock solutions at 10 mM of each metal, CuCl2, NiCl2, and CdCl2, were used to make a series of diluted solutions at concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 μM for each metal. Each diluted solution of metal ions (100 μL) was added into each microtiter well containing 100 μL of the protein solution. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min, the fluorescence intensity was measured as indicated above.

Determination of heavy metal (Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+) content in artificially contaminated water and culture medium using mApple-D6A3

The partially purified protein mApple-D6A3 was diluted to 0.5 mg/mL with tap water, and a concentration gradient (20, 40 and 60 μM) of heavy metal solutions was prepared also using tap water as a solvent. The detection method was performed as indicated above.

We also artificially contaminated LB medium with heavy metal ions at a concentration gradient of 0.2 and 0.6 mM. Simultaneously, the engineered strain BL21 (DE3) harboring pET30a-mApple-D6A3 was inoculated into LB medium and cultured at 37 °C while being agitated at 200 rpm. When the OD600 of the culture measured between 0.6–0.8, the expression of mApple-D6A3 was induced by adding 0.5 mM IPTG and then further cultured at 16 °C while shaking at 200 rpm for 16–18 h. To obtain the E. coli BL21 (DE3) cell bodies, 500 μL of the culture broth was taken and centrifuged at 4 °C, 10,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant solution was discarded. One milliliter of metal ion solution of each of the different concentrations were added to each cell sample and incubated at 37 °C and agitated at 200 rpm for 20 min. Then 200 μL of each mixture was transferred to a microplate to measure fluorescence intensity as indicated above.

Results

Expression of screened recombinant sensory proteins

Metal-binding proteins, as potentially essential elements of biosensors, have different qualities, stabilities, and abilities to bind to metal ions. In order to determine the best protein as a biosensor that is also suitable for complex and variable external environments, four different metal-binding proteins were screened: CapB, a protein associated cadmium resistance in E. coli (Qin et al. 2017); D6A3, a cadmium-binding protein originating from rice (Yu et al. 2018); CadR, a protein derived from the Pseudomonas putida S16 and involved in intracellular metal efflux (Lee et al. 2001); and metallothionein (MT), a metal-binding protein derived from mice (Valls et al. 2000). Then the expression of each recombinant protein in E. coli BL21 (DE3) was tested. The results comparing our four metal-binding proteins showed that the mApple-CapB protein formed insoluble inclusion bodies, while the soluble proteins of mApple-CadR, mApple-MT, and mApple-D6A3 were successfully expressed (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). When 100 μM Cd2+ was added to the recombinant protein solution (0.5 mg/mL), the fluorescence intensity of all three soluble recombinant proteins variably declined, suggesting differential affinity and chelation properties of these recombinant proteins for Cd2+. We suspect that the decline may be due to the amount and location of Cd2+ binding to the sensor proteins (Khan et al. 2020). Subsequently, the correlations between the increase in the concentration of Cd2+ and the decrease in the fluorescence intensity of the three soluble recombinant proteins were examined and produced linear relationships between the two elements. The mApple-D6A3 construct had the highest linear correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.994), indicating the strongest relationship with the concentration of Cd2+. Coefficients of the other two proteins mApple-CadR and mApple-MT were 0.960 and 0.872, respectively (Fig. 1). Hence, we selected mApple-D6A3 as the best candidate for a metal-sensing protein in this study.

Fig. 1
figure1

The linear relationships between different sensor proteins and the concentration of Cd2+. black box: mApple-D6A3, red circle: mApple-MT, blue triangle: mApple-CadR

Detection for multiple metal ions

In order to broaden the application range of this biosensor protein mApple-D6A3, the protein was incubated with each of six different divalent metal ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Ba2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+). Intensity of fluorescence was used to measure the level of response of the sensor protein in detecting each metal ion. The results showed that the fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 did not differ much when Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, or Ba2+ was added (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). In contrast, the addition of Cu2+, Ni2+ or Cd2+ reduced fluorescence intensity to 7%, 35% and 70% of the intensity of the control group, respectively (Fig. 2). We then examined the effects of Cu2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ on the fluorescence intensity of cells transformed with mApple alone. The results show that compared to the control group, the presence of Ni2+ reduced the fluorescence intensity of mApple by about 40%, Cu2+ almost quenched the fluorescence to about 12%, and Cd2+ did not change significantly the fluorescence intensity of mApple (Fig. 2). These results further demonstrate the ability of the recombinant protein mApple-D6A3 to detect heavy metals.

Fig. 2
figure2

The response of mApple and mApple-D6A3 to Cu2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+

Effect of pH on fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3

To determine the stability of the sensor protein mApple-D6A3 acting in potentially complex and changing external environments, we assessed its activity under different pH levels for two different incubation periods. Similarities in fluorescence intensity between the two incubation treatments across the range of pH levels suggest that incubation time had little effect on fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3, while pH had significant effect on intensity. Fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 increased with increasing pH between 3.0 and 9.0, decreased slightly between 9.0 and 10.0 and peaking at 9.0 (Fig. 3). The slight decrease in intensity may be caused by partial protein denaturation under alkaline conditions. The results suggested that the fluorescence intensity of the sensor protein was severely hindered under acidic conditions and relatively stable under alkaline conditions. Therefore, the pH of reaction buffers used in further experiments in this study was 9.0.

Fig. 3
figure3

Fluorescence intensity of the mApple-D6A3 protein across a range of pH levels

Mechanism of interactions between mApple-D6A3 and metal ions

Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments were performed to determine the binding properties of sensory proteins to different metal ions (Cd2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+). The results show that, compared with the control group, when a solution of either Cd2+, Cu2+ or Ni2+ was dripped into the sensor protein solution, an obvious exothermic reaction occurred. With the increase of number of drops of the ion solution, the exothermic heat gradually decreased until saturation. The KD values for Cd2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+ were 27.25 ± 8.91, 20.70 ± 9.39 and 41.49 ± 11.26 μM, respectively. The ΔH values were − 25410 ± 11460, − 27940 ± 8464 and − 91410 ± 157400 cal/mol, respectively (Fig. 4). The results indicate that the strength of binding capacity of mApple-D6A3 to metal ions ranked as follows: Cu2+  > Cd2+  > Ni2+.

Fig. 4
figure4

Determination of binding capacity of mApple-D6A3 to heavy metal ions by isothermal titration calorimetry to the metal ions were a Cd2+, b Cu2+, and c Ni2+. d Deionized water was the control

Biosensor detection of heavy metal ions in soil and sewage

As shown in Fig. 1, there was a strong linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 and concentration of Cd2+ (R2 = 0.994). There were also highly correlated linear relationships between the fluorescence intensity of mApple-D6A3 and the concentrations of Ni2+ and Cu2+, where for both metals R2 = 0.973 (Fig. 5). Because of these high correlations, we used each of the three heavy metal ions to artificially pollute tap water and culture medium and tested mApple-D6A3′s ability to detect these ions in each substance.

Fig. 5
figure5

Relationships between mApple-D6A3 and heavy metal ions. The linear relationships between mApple-D6A3 fluorescence intensity and the concentrations of a Cu2+ and b Ni2+

The results show that the concentrations of Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ in tap water detected by the mApple-D6A3 protein were 18.67 ± 3.74, 21.38 ± 3.11, and 19.27 ± 0.52 μM, respectively. Compared with the standard concentration of 20 μM, the accuracy rates were 93%, 94% and 96%, respectively. The detection accuracy of the 40 μM Cu2+- and 60 μM Ni2+-tap water solutions also reached more than 80% (Table 1).

Table 1 Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ in tap water detected by the mApple-D6A3 protein

In LB culture samples, the artificially established concentrations of Cu2+ (0.2 mM) and Ni2+ (0.6 mM) were measured using BL21 cell bodies that expressed the mApple-D6A3 protein. The detected concentrations were 0.23 ± 0.03 mM from the 0.2 mM Cu2+ treatment, 0.21 ± 0.04 mM from the 0.2 mM Ni2+ treatment, 0.74 ± 0.03 mM from the 0.6 mM Cu2+ treatment and 0.60 ± 0.01 mM from the 0.6 mM Ni2+ treatment. The accuracy rates were as high as 87%, 93%, 81% and 99%, respectively, indicating that the fluorescent cells have the ability to recognize Cu2+ and Ni2+ in the LB medium.

The concentrations of Cd2+ in the culture medium of treatment concentrations of 0.4 and 0.6 mM were also measured by the fluorescent expression in cells. The former treatment measured at 0.47 ± 0.03 mM and the latter treatment measured at 0.66 ± 0.11 mM; both rates of detection were above 80% (Table 2). Overall, this experiment demonstrated that the sensor protein mApple-D6A3, or its host cell, has the ability to detect heavy metal ions in tap water and LB medium with complex components, with greater than 80% accuracy.

Table 2 Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ in culture medium detected by the mApple-D6A3 host

Discussion

The metal-binding protein D6A3 had previously been shown to be able to bind Cd2+ (Yu et al. 2018). Here, we demonstrated that the biosensor mApple-D6A3 has the ability to bind Cu2+ and Ni2+ as well. Furthermore, the strongest to weakest binding capacities of mApple-D6A3 to the three divalent metal ions was Cu2+  > Cd2+  > Ni2+, while the strongest to weakest response sensitivity of mApple-D6A3 to the same ions was Cu2+  > Ni2+  > Cd2+. Together, the data indicate that there was no direct association between the response sensitivity and binding capacity of the sensor protein. Perhaps the exposure to metal ions may have altered the conformation of the recombinant protein, thus affecting the position of the fluorescent luminescent group. The position of the chromophore is closely related to changes in fluorescence intensity of the sensor protein (Koker et al. 2018; Krishnamoorthy 2018; Luo et al. 2016).

The biosensor we constructed, mApple-D6A3, is naturally a recombinant protein. In previous work, we attempted to construct a sensor protein using the green fluorescent protein. Unfortunately, the fluorescence of the GFP was quenched by Hg2+ readily and thus inadequate for our purposes. The presence of the fluorescent protein mApple not only endowed this recombinant protein with fluorescent properties, it also functioned in enhancing protein stability. In addition, the metal-chelating characteristics of the metal-binding protein D6A3 contributed to the successful construction and application of the biosensor.

The sensor protein mApple-D6A3 detected metal ions in the concentration range of 0–1 mM, which is relatively high (Kim et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2019). However, the limit of reliable detection mainly depends on the sensor’s response to heavy metal ions and noise in the read out system (Leuermann et al. 2019). Nevertheless, we can continue to investigate further the mechanisms of action of mApple-D6A3 on metal ions and combine these future studies with bioinformatics strategies to design mutants with enhanced sensitivity and efficiency for binding heavy metal ions, while minimizing the potential effects that the external environment may have on them, thereby expanding their detection limits.

Every detection method has its benefits and drawbacks. Compared to WCBs, protein biosensors are disadvantaged because of their poor stability and resistance to stress when applied in complex environments. But as a non-living macromolecule, they have the most important advantage of being eco-friendlier. Although our proposed strategy requires further improvements, we creatively combined a red fluorescent protein with a metal-binding protein to promote the development of biosensing technology.

References

  1. Abu-El-Zahab HSH, Hamza RZ, Montaser MM, El-Mahdi MM, Al-Harthi WA (2019) Antioxidant, antiapoptotic, antigenotoxic, and hepatic ameliorative effects of L-carnitine and selenium on cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and alterations in liver cell structure in male mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 173:419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.041

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brewer GJ (2015) Copper-2 ingestion, plus increased meat eating leading to increased copper absorption, are major factors behind the current epidemic of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients 7(12):10053–10064. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7125513

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng D, Hao Y, Yang S, Han Q, Liu L, Xiang Y, Tu F, Xia N (2019) A signal-on electrochemical biosensor for evaluation of caspase-3 activity and cell apoptosis by the generation of molecular electrocatalysts on graphene electrode surface for water oxidation. Sens Actuators B Chem 286:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.137

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duan J, Tan J (2013) Atmospheric heavy metals and Arsenic in China: Situation, sources and control policies. Atmos Environ 74:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.031

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR (1989) Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(89)90359-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia M, Lu Y, Wang R, Ren N, Zhang J, Changhua X, Wu J (2020) Extended GR-5 DNAzyme-based autonomous isothermal cascade machine: an efficient and sensitive one-tube colorimetric platform for Pb2+ detection. Sens Actuators B Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.127366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan A, Salama ES, Chen Z, Ni H, Zhao S, Zhou T, Pei Y, Sani RK, Ling Z, Liu P, Li X (2020) A novel biosensor for zinc detection based on microbial fuel cell system. Biosens Bioelectron 147:111763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111763

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khodadadi A, Faghih-Mirzaei E, Karimi-Maleh H, Abbaspourrad A, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2019) A new epirubicin biosensor based on amplifying DNA interactions with polypyrrole and nitrogen-doped reduced graphene: experimental and docking theoretical investigations. Sens Actuators B Chem 284:568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.164

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim H, Lee W, Yoon Y (2019) Heavy metal (loid) biosensor based on split-enhanced green fluorescent protein: development and characterization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(15):6345–6352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09908-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koker T, Fernandez A, Pinaud F (2018) Characterization of split fluorescent protein variants and quantitative analyses of their self-assembly process. Sci Rep 8(1):5344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23625-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamoorthy G (2018) Intramolecular distance distribution reveals mechanisms in protein folding and dynamics. P Natl A Sci India A 88(3):415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-018-0525-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SW, Glickmann E, Cooksey DA (2001) Chromosomal locus for cadmium resistance in Pseudomonas putida consisting of a cadmium-transporting ATPase and a MerR family response regulator. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(4):1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.1128/Aem.67.4.1437-1444.2001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee W, Kim H, Kang Y, Lee Y, Yoon Y (2019) A biosensor platform for metal detection based on enhanced green fluorescent protein. Sensors 19(8):1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081846

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leuermann J, Fernández-Gavela A, Torres-Cubillo A, Postigo S, Sánchez-Postigo A, Lechuga LM, Halir R, Molina-Fernández Í (2019) Optimizing the limit of detection of waveguide-based interferometric biosensor devices. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Luo N, Li YW, Cai QY, Li HY, Mo CH, Wong MH (2017) Cadmium in rice: transport mechanisms, influencing factors, and minimizing measures. Environ Pollut 224:622–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.087

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Sun Z, Tian L, He T, Li J, Wang J, Wang H, Chen B (2020) Effects of spatial expansion between Phragmites australis and Cyperus malaccensis on variations of arsenic and heavy metals in decomposing litters in a typical subtropical estuary (Min River). China Chemosphere 240:124965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124965

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Z, Ma Z, van der Kuijp TJ, Yuan Z, Huang L (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468–469:843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo X, Wang TA, Zhang Y, Wang F, Schultz PG (2016) Stabilizing protein motifs with a genetically encoded metal-ion chelator. Cell Chem Biol 23(9):1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mandel M, Higa A (1970) Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol 53(1):159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90051-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehta J, Bhardwaj SK, Bhardwaj N, Paul AK, Kumar P, Kim KH, Deep A (2016) Progress in the biosensing techniques for trace-level heavy metals. Biotechnol Adv 34(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ommati MM, Jamshidzadeh A, Heidari R, Sun Z, Zamiri MJ, Khodaei F, Mousapour S, Ahmadi F, Javanmard N, Shirazi Yeganeh B (2019) Carnosine and histidine supplementation blunt lead-induced reproductive toxicity through antioxidative and mitochondria-dependent mechanisms. Biol Trace Elem Res 187(1):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1358-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prasher DC1 EV, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ (1992) Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene 111(2):229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin W, Liu X, Yu X, Chu X, Tian J, Wu N (2017) Identification of cadmium resistance and adsorption gene from Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). RSC Advances 7(81):51460–51465. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra10656d

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajeshkumar S, Liu Y, Zhang X, Ravikumar B, Bai G, Li X (2018) Studies on seasonal pollution of heavy metals in water, sediment, fish and oyster from the Meiliang Bay of Taihu Lake in China. Chemosphere 191:626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.078

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Soleja N, Jairajpuri MA, Queen A, Mohsin M (2019) Genetically encoded FRET-based optical sensor for Hg2+ detection and intracellular imaging in living cells. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 46(12):1669–1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-019-02235-w

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan L, Schirmer K (2017) Cell culture-based biosensing techniques for detecting toxicity in water. Curr Opin Biotechnol 45:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Valls M, Atrian S, de Lorenzo V, Fernandez LA (2000) Engineering a mouse metallothionein on the cell surface of Ralstonia eutropha CH34 for immobilization of heavy metals in soil. Nat Biotechnol 18(6):661–665. https://doi.org/10.1038/76516

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Q, Jing J, Wang B (2019) Highly sensitive SPR biosensor based on graphene oxide and staphylococcal protein a Co-modified TFBG for human IgG detection. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 68(9):3350–3357. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2018.2875961

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu T, Close DM, Sayler GS, Ripp S (2013) Genetically modified whole-cell bioreporters for environmental assessment. Ecol Indic 28:125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.020

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan Y, Liu X, Li Q, Chu X, Tian J, Wu N (2018) Effect of rare codons in C-terminal of green fluorescent protein on protein production in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 149:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2018.04.011

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Q, Li Z, Lu X, Duan Q, Huang L, Bi J (2018) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 642:690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.068

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoon Y, Kang Y, Lee W, Oh KC, Jang G, Kim BG (2018) Modulating the properties of metal-sensing whole-cell bioreporters by interfering with Escherichia coli metal homeostasis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(2):323–329. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1710.10012

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu X, Wei S, Yang YX, Ding ZD, Wang Q, Zhao JT, Liu XQ, Chu XY, Tian J, Wu NF, Fan YL (2018) Identification of cadmium-binding proteins from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Biol Macromol 119:597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.190

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhai M, Shang Q (2007) Research advance of environmental cadmium exposure on human health damage. Wei sheng yan jiu 36(2):255–257 (Chinese.PMID: 17555113)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank for the Dr. Bingxue Zhou in Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for helping us to conduct the ITC experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant No. 31770124), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution (Grant No. Y2019XK01) and Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JT, DL and NW conceived and designed research. YJ, FG and XZ conducted experiments. JT, FG and NW analyzed data. FG and JT wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daling Liu or Jian Tian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. sequence information. Table S2. Primers used in this study. Table S3. Strains and plasmids used in this study. Fig. S1. SDS-PAGE of purified mApple-D6A3, mApple-CadR and mApple-MT. M: protein marker. 1: mApple-MT; 2: mApple-D6A3; 3: mApple-CadR. Fig. S2. The response of the mApple-D6A3 to other different metal ions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Y., Guan, F., Zhou, X. et al. Construction of a mApple-D6A3-mediated biosensor for detection of heavy metal ions. AMB Expr 10, 213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01154-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biosensor
  • mApple-D6A3
  • Heavy metal
  • Detection