Skip to main content

Harnessing the strategy of metagenomics for exploring the intestinal microecology of sable (Martes zibellina), the national first-level protected animal

Abstract

Sable (Martes zibellina), a member of family Mustelidae, order Carnivora, is primarily distributed in the cold northern zone of Eurasia. The purpose of this study was to explore the intestinal flora of the sable by metagenomic library-based techniques. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 instrument. The effective sequencing data of each sample was above 6000 M, and the ratio of clean reads to raw reads was over 98%. The total ORF length was approximately 603,031, equivalent to 347.36 Mbp. We investigated gene functions with the KEGG database and identified 7140 KEGG ortholog (KO) groups comprising 129,788 genes across all of the samples. We selected a subset of genes with the highest abundances to construct cluster heat maps. From the results of the KEGG metabolic pathway annotations, we acquired information on gene functions, as represented by the categories of metabolism, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, cellular processes and organismal systems. We then investigated gene function with the CAZy database and identified functional carbohydrate hydrolases corresponding to genes in the intestinal microorganisms of sable. This finding is consistent with the fact that the sable is adapted to cold environments and requires a large amount of energy to maintain its metabolic activity. We also investigated gene functions with the eggNOG database; the main functions of genes included gene duplication, recombination and repair, transport and metabolism of amino acids, and transport and metabolism of carbohydrates. In this study, we attempted to identify the complex structure of the microbial population of sable based on metagenomic sequencing methods, which use whole metagenomic data, and to map the obtained sequences to known genes or pathways in existing databases, such as CAZy, KEGG, and eggNOG. We then explored the genetic composition and functional diversity of the microbial community based on the mapped functional categories.

Introduction

The communities of microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of animals are vast and diverse, with cell numbers exceeding the number of host cells (Krone et al. 2014; Li et al. 2018a, b; Zhu et al. 2018). The intestinal microbial population can be considered a separate organ that encodes 150-fold more genes than the host genome (Guan et al. 2016; Hasan et al. 2019; Jain et al. 2018). In general, the gut microflora is considered a diverse and dynamic ecosystem that maintains the homeostasis of the intestinal tract (Ma et al. 2019; Oliphant and Allen-Vercoe 2019; Taha-Abdelaziz et al. 2018). The status of the intestinal microbiota is closely related to intrinsic and extrinsic host factors, including birth, diet, nutrition, stress, drugs, habitat and social contact (Hale et al. 2019; Jang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2017; Robertson et al. 2018). Gut microorganisms are indispensable for nutrient absorption by the host and host metabolism (De Mandal et al. 2018; Deng et al. 2019; Dong et al. 2018; Pan et al. 2019; Si et al. 2020). For instance, Firmicutes, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus have multiple beneficial effects on host metabolism, producing energy and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Antunes et al. 2019; Bang et al. 2018; Blakeley-Ruiz et al. 2019). Furthermore, the intestinal microbiota regulates carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (Li et al. 2018a, b; Pekkala et al. 2017), providing the host with sources of energy or activating receptors (Federici 2019). Intestinal microorganisms are also involved in the synthesis of key vitamins that cannot be produced by their host organisms (Grieneisen et al. 2019; Martin et al. 2018; Srugo et al. 2019). Accumulating evidence shows that antigenic stimuli from gut microbiota play significant roles in shaping the intestinal immune responses that can affect host health (Doulberis et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2017a, b; Xue et al. 2019). The intestinal bacteria also influence the development of the intestinal epithelium to strengthen intestinal barrier function (Hill et al. 2016; Li et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2020).

The sable (Martes zibellina), a carnivorous mammal distributed across the cold northern zone of Eurasia (Li et al. 2013), is famous for its valuable, warm fur (Guan et al. 2016; Monakhov et al. 2018; Svishcheva and Kashtanov 2011). The sable has a slender body and a high surface-to-volume ratio, and it maintains a low body fat percentage of approximately 8%, even during particularly cold winters (Mustonen and Nieminen 2006). Thus, a high metabolic rate should be required for its survival (Mustonen et al. 2006). We sought to investigate the correlations of metabolic functions with the intestinal flora of sable. Traditionally, the type of intestinal microflora has been determined through bacterial culture (Wu et al. 2017a, b). However, the growth environments of many bacteria cannot be adequately replicated in vitro, which hinders the study of microbial diversity and function (Tully et al. 2018). In recent years, the progress of high-throughput sequencing technologies has allowed fundamental advancements in DNA sequencing (Shui et al. 2020). With the declining expense of DNA sequencing, metagenomics has been rapidly developing (Johnson 2019). Metagenomics techniques are commonly used to sequence and analyse the whole genomes of microbes from a sample without the need for cell culture. Metagenomics is widely applied to probe environmental microbial diversity at multiple levels and enables the study of microbial community structure and ecosystem function (Martin et al. 2018).

In this study, we sought to identify the complex structure of the intestinal microbial population of sable based on metagenomic sequencing methods, which use whole metagenomic data, and to map the obtained sequences to known genes or pathways in existing databases, such as CAZy, KEGG, and eggNOG. We then explored the genetic composition and functional diversity of the microbial community based on the mapped functional categories. In ancient China, the sable was considered a valuable fur animal; however, at present, there is no mature rearing strategy. The present work was devoted to acquiring a detailed view of the functional structure of the intestinal flora, and it provides valuable information that can guide sable breeding.

Materials and methods

All faecal samples analysed in this study were collected at Dalian Mingwei Marten Industry Company Limited and derived from wild sables imported from Mohe County of Heilongjiang Province and Greater Khingan Range. As carnivores, the sables were fed fish and chicken. When collecting stool samples, we recorded information on host gender, sampling date and cage number. Fresh faecal samples from sables were collected aseptically in sterile stool containers and immediately frozen in a freezer. The samples were categorized into three groups, with the five faecal samples from female sables labelled MZF.1–MZF.5, the four faecal samples from male sables labelled MZM.1–MZM.4, and the samples of intestinal contents labelled MZS.1, MZB.1 and MZB.2 (Table 1). Before DNA extraction from the faecal samples, we ensured the samples were used immediately upon removal from the freezer and avoided sample contamination.

Table 1 Table of the information in samples

DNA extraction, library preparation and metagenomics sequencing

The QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract microbial DNA from the sable stool samples. Before library construction, the DNA was evaluated for quality control and quantified. Agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) was used to analyse the purity and integrity of the DNA, and Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen, USA) was used to precisely quantify DNA concentration. During library construction, qualified DNA samples were randomly broken into fragments approximately 350 bp in length with an ultrasonic crusher (Covaris, UK). Then, the fragments were end-repaired, A-tailed, and ligated to adapters. After library preparation, Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen, USA) was used for initial quantification, and the library was diluted to 2 ng/µl. Subsequently, an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA) was used to determine whether the insert sizes of the library corresponded to expectations. To ensure library quality, real-time q-PCR was used to accurately quantify the effective concentration (> 3 nM) of the library. After the library passed the inspection, sequencing was implemented on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina, USA). The raw reads are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject ID PRJNA630144, SRA SRP265006).

Quality control and genome assembly

In metagenomics research, the raw genome data obtained after sequencing include adapter information and low-quality bases, which interfere with subsequent analysis. Therefore, the raw data require quality control to remove interfering data and obtain clean data. Because of the possibility of host genome contamination, we searched the data against a database of host genes to filter out reads from host genes (SOAP aligner parameter settings: identity ≥ 90%, -l 30, -v 7, -M 4, -m 200, -×400). Reads with a quality value less than 38 (different from the default setting of ≤ 40) and number of Ns (undetected bases) at or exceeding the set number (default set to 10) were removed. In addition, reads with an overlap between the adapter and the sequence exceeding a certain threshold (≥ 15 bp) were removed. Clean data were obtained after these filtering steps, and SOAP denovo assembly software was used for assembly analysis (Luo et al. 2012). For each sample, k-mer = 55 was selected to obtain the assembly results (assembly parameters: -d 1, -M 3, -R, -u, -F) (Brum et al. 2015; Feng et al. 2015; Qin et al. 2014; Scher et al. 2013). The scaffolds were interrupted from the N-junctions to obtain N-free sequence fragments called scaftigs (i.e., continuous sequences within scaffolds) (Mende et al. 2012). The clean data for each sample were compared to the scaftigs of each sample by SOAP aligner software to obtain PE reads (alignment parameters: -u, -2, -m 200). After pooling the clean reads from each sample, k-mer = 55 was selected for mixed assembly (Karlsson et al. 2013), the remaining assembly parameters were the same as those used for single sample assembly. The scaffolds were broken from the N-junctions to obtain scaftig sequences without Ns. For the scaftigs generated by both single sample assembly and mixed assembly, fragments less than 500 bp were filtered out (Zeller et al. 2014), and statistical analysis and subsequent gene prediction were performed.

Gene prediction and abundance analysis

Employing the scaftigs for each sample assembly and mixed assembly ( > = 500 bp), MetaGeneMark was used for open reading frame (ORF) prediction (Li et al. 2014). Fragments less than 100 nt in length were filtered out from the prediction results. For the ORF prediction results of each sample, CD-HIT software was used to remove redundancies, yielding an initial non-redundant gene catalogue. Clustering was conducted with identity 95% and coverage 90%, and the longest sequence was selected as the representative sequence (parameters: -c 0.95, -G 0, -aS 0.9, -g 1, -d 0). The clean data for each sample were compared with the initial gene catalogue by SOAPaligner, and the number of reads of genes in each sample was calculated (alignment parameters: -m 200, -×400, identity ≥ 95%). The number of genes supporting reads in each sample ≤ 2 were filtered out to obtain the final gene catalogue for subsequent analysis (Qin et al. 2012). The abundance information of each gene in each sample was calculated from the number of reads and gene length (Villar et al. 2015). Based on the abundance information of each gene in each sample, descriptive statistics were calculated, and core-pan gene analysis, sample correlation analysis, and Venn diagram analysis of gene number were conducted (blastp, evalue ≤ 1e−5).

Species annotation

DIAMOND software was used to compare the unigenes with the sequences of bacteria, fungi, archaea and viruses extracted from the NCBI NR database (Buchfink et al. 2015). Alignment filtering was conducted using evalue ≤ minimum evalue * 10 for each sequence alignment for subsequent analysis. Multiple alignment results for each sequence may arise after filtering, yielding different species classification information. Thus, to ensure its biological significance, the LCA algorithm (a systematic classification algorithm applied in MEGAN software) was adopted to assign the classification level before the first branch as the species annotation information of the sequence (Huson et al. 2011). Based on the LCA annotation results and the gene abundance table, the abundance information of each sample at each classification level (genus and species) was obtained. The abundance of a species in a sample was determined as the sum of the gene abundance of the species annotated. For each species, the number of genes in a sample was equal to the number of genes with abundances greater than 0 in the annotated species.

Functional database and resistance gene annotation

Currently, the commonly used databases providing functional annotations mainly include Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Evolutionary Genealogy of Genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups (eggNOG), and Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Database (CAZy). The KEGG database was introduced by Kanehisa Laboratories in 1995 with version 0.1. It has since developed into a comprehensive database, the core of which is the KEGG pathway database and the KEGG Ortholog database. In the KEGG Ortholog database, genes performing the same function are clustered together into groups called ortholog groups (KO entries). In the KEGG pathway database, biological metabolic pathways are divided into 6 categories: cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, human diseases, metabolism, and organismal systems. The second layer currently includes 43 seed pathways, the third layer comprises metabolic pathway diagrams, and the fourth layer provides specific annotation information for each metabolic pathway map. The eggNOG database uses the Smith-Waterman comparison algorithm to annotate the orthologous groups of genes. eggNOG V4.1 covers 2,031 species and approximately 190,000 orthologous groups. The CAZy database is used to annotate carbohydrate enzymes and covers six main functional categories: GHs (glycoside hydrolases), GTs (glycosyl transferases), PLs (polysaccharide lyases), CEs (carbohydrate esterases), AAs (auxiliary activities) and CBMs (carbohydrate-binding modules). DIAMOND software was used to compare unigenes with each functional database (blastp, evalue ≤ 1e−5). In the alignment filtering step, the alignment results of each sequence with the highest score (one HSP > 60 bits) were selected for subsequent analysis. Based on the results of the functional annotations and the gene abundance table, the number of genes in each sample at each classification level was obtained. The number of genes with a certain function in a sample was calculated as the number of genes with non-zero abundance. Based on the abundance table at each classification level, analyses of the number and relative abundance of annotated genes were conducted. Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) software provided by CARD was employed to compare unigenes with the CARD database (RGI built-in blastp, evalue ≤ 1e–30) (Qin et al. 2010). Based on the comparison results of RGI and the abundance information of unigenes, the relative abundance of ARO was calculated. Employing the ARO abundance data, a Venn diagram of abundance distribution was constructed, ARO differences between groups were analysed, and species attribution analysis of resistance genes (with focus on ARO unigenes) was conducted.

Results

Extraction of total microbial DNA from samples

The microbial genomes of the samples were extracted using the QIAGEN kit specialized for DNA extraction from stool samples. Total DNA was preliminarily detected by agarose-gel electrophoresis, and the total DNA concentration was detected by Qubit fluorometer to determine whether the samples met the requirements for database construction. The results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The detection report of DNA

Sequencing data statistics

The Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing platform was used to obtain the original data (raw data), and the sequencing data were statistically analysed. For quality control, low-quality reads were removed. In total, after size filtering and quality control, read numbers were obtained. The clean data accounted for more than 98% of the raw data, showing that the data met the quality requirements for subsequent analysis. Descriptive statistics are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 The statistical information of sample data

Valid data assembly results

After quality control and filtering, the data were assembled. After determining the overlap between sequences based on sequence similarity, we constructed contig sequences. Furthermore, scaffold sequences were obtained by connecting contig sequences based on paired-end relationships. The scaffold sequences contained gaps, denoted by N or n. Next, the assembled scaffolds were interrupted from the N connections to obtain scaftig sequence fragments without N. We used NOVO_MIX to filter out the scaftig fragments under 500 bp. The remaining sequences were used for subsequent analysis. The results of data assembly are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 The statistical information of sample assembled results

Gene prediction

After data assembly, MetaGeneMark was used to predict the open reading frames (ORFs). The ORFs with predicted lengths less than 100 nt were filtered out. We then used CD-HIT software to remove redundant information (protein level) and obtain the initial non-redundant gene catalogue. We selected an identity value of 95% and a coverage value of 90% for clustering, and the longest sequence was selected as the representative sequence. Next, the clean data for each sample were compared with the original gene catalogue using SOAP aligner software, and the number of reads of each gene in each sample was obtained. Those genes in each sample with 2 or fewer reads were filtered out. We then obtained the distribution of reads for the reference genes. Moreover, the abundance information of each gene in each sample was obtained. We obtained a total of 603,031 open reading frames (ORFs). Genes with both start and stop codons accounted for 29.38%~49.66% of the genes in each sample, and genes with neither initiation nor termination codons accounted for 5.83–12.09%. The average ORF length was 347.36 Mbp. The average length for each sample is shown in Table 5.

Table 5 The statistical information of predicted gene

Species abundance

Based on the relative abundance table of different classification levels, the top 35 genera with respect to abundance and their abundance information in each sample were selected to constructed a heat map. Clustering was conducted at the species level to visualize the data and identify the species with higher levels of aggregation in the samples (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Cluster heat map of relative abundance at genus level

To visualize the relative abundance data of the intestinal flora, boxplots of the relative abundances of gut bacteria at the phylum level were constructed. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the preponderant phyla in all groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Relative abundance of gut bacterial at the phylum taxonomical level

Principal component analysis

Because of the complexity of sample data, we used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce and simplify the sample data. Results from principal component analysis (PCA) are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure3

Principal Component Analysis

KEGG annotation results

The predicted unique genes were searched against the KEGG functional database, and 7140 genes were obtained. The total number of genes across all samples reached 127,839. As shown in Fig. 4, the category associated with the highest number of genes was carbohydrate metabolism, accounting for 11.86% of the genes, which suggests that carbohydrate, as the most important energy supplier, is the main energy source provided to the host by the intestinal flora. Among the processing functions, membrane transportation was associated with a high proportion of genes, accounting for 7.79% of the total number of genes in all samples. This finding indicates that continuous exchange of nutrients and metabolites occurs between the intestinal flora and the host via membrane transportation, with the intestinal microorganisms aiding host digestion of food and providing the host with vitamins and amino acids. Based on the KEGG metabolic pathway annotations, we acquired information on gene function (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Relative abundance of pathways

Fig. 5
figure5

KEGG pathway annotation

CAZy annotation results

Searching the unique genes against the CAZy database (Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes database), the number of genes corresponding to the six categories of carbohydrate enzymes was obtained. As shown in Fig. 3, the category GH (glycoside hydrolases) corresponded to the greatest proportion of genes, and the category PL (polysaccharide lyases) corresponded to the lowest number of genes. Based on the annotation results, the relative abundances of genes belonging to the six carbohydrate enzyme categories were plotted in a bar chart (Fig. 6), and the numbers of matched genes of carbohydrates were plotted (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure6

Relative abundance of carbohydrates

Fig. 7
figure7

Number of matched genes of carbohydrates

EggNOG annotates

The eggNOG database encompasses the COG, KOG and Orthologous Groups databases, and was used to obtain corresponding functional annotations of the sequences. Comparison of the unique genes with genes in the eggNOG database revealed that the main functions of the genes included gene replication, repair of amino acid transport, carbohydrate metabolism and transport. The eggNOG database annotation results are shown in Figs. 8 and 9.

Fig. 8
figure8

Relative abundance of function class

Fig. 9
figure9

Number of matched genes of function class

Resistant gene annotation

To reflect the distribution of ARO in each sample, based on the abundance information of ARO in each sample, the top 30 AROs were selected to construct an abundance cluster heat map (Fig. 10). In addition, based on the annotation results of the CARD database, a network diagram of species associated with resistance genes was constructed (Fig. 11).

Fig. 10
figure10

ARO distribution and abundance cluster heat map. The right vertical axis is the ARO name, and the left vertical axis is the ARO cluster tree

Fig. 11
figure11

The overview circle graph of resistance gene

Discussion

The dominant phyla in the human and mouse gut are Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Consortium 2012), and in chickens, the four most abundant bacterial phyla are Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria (Choi et al. 2014). Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the two most prevalent bacteria phyla found in the ruminant gastrointestinal tract (Ye et al. 2016). Among fish, the two most common and abundant bacterial phyla are Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria (Hill et al. 2016; Wong and Rawls 2012). Regarding invertebrates, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes have been identified as the dominant phyla in the gut bacterial communities of Drosophila melanogaster (Broderick and Lemaitre 2012), and Proteobacteria has been identified as the dominant phylum in E. sinensis (Chen et al. 2015). The results from this study show that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes are the dominant bacteria among the intestinal microorganisms of sable at the phylum level. Below the phylum level, the most abundant taxa were similar among the samples, although they differed significantly in abundance. The dominant species within the phyla Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were similar among the samples, demonstrating close relationships of these taxa with the host. Our studies support the view there these microbial taxa have coevolved with their sable host.

The KEGG annotation results revealed that the number of genes corresponding to the function metabolism reached 77,891, representing 60.93% of the total number of genes. Within the metabolism category, the subcategory associated with the highest number of genes, 15,397, was carbohydrate catabolism, which accounted for 11.86% of the genes. These results indicated that the bacterial community of sable is closely associated with digestive tract function. At the order level, Enterobacteriales, Lactobacillales and Clostridiales were the dominant bacterial taxa, demonstrating that the intestinal flora plays significant roles in carbohydrate metabolism. The dominant order of intestinal microorganisms within Firmicutes was Clostridium, which is involved in the decomposition of cellulose. In addition, some carbohydrate catabolism and vitamin synthesis are usually performed by the intestinal flora (Gao et al. 2020).

In the CAZy database annotation, the number of genes corresponding to glycoside hydrolases was 5267. Glycoside hydrolases are involved in the synthesis of glycoconjugates. The number of glycosyltransferase-associated genes was 3347. The main function of glycosyltransferases is to attach activated sugar groups to various receptor molecules. The number of genes corresponding to carbohydrate-binding modules was 1421, and the number corresponding to carbohydrate esterases was 542. The number of polysaccharide lysate-associated genes was 51, and the number of genes involved in auxiliary activities was 174. These enzymes participate in the degradation and modification of carbohydrates and the formation of glycosidic bonds. Recently, much research has been aimed at determining the complexity of the relationships between the host and the gut microbiota.

Although intestinal microbes are closely associated with the immune system, their relationships with gut immunity remain unknown. The intestinal flora plays important roles in maintaining intestinal health (Zhou et al. 2019). In this study, based on sequence alignment using non-redundant CARD databases and the annotation results, we found an abundance of multiple drug-resistant Mexb protein genes, indicating that the gut microflora plays a role in the immune response to exogenous substances. Regarding the functions of genes in the category environmental information processing, the subcategory membrane transport was associated with the highest number of genes, accounting for 7.79% of the total genes of all samples. This finding indicates that the host and intestinal flora are constantly exchanging substances. The genes associated with the category inorganic transport and metabolism encode phosphate, sulfate, and various cation transporters (Gill et al. 2006). The identified microbial proteins were searched in the COG functional database, which revealed high expression levels of genes associated with inorganic transport and metabolism in healthy children and low levels in obese children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Michail et al. 2014). The cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis genes participate in transmembrane transport and the exocytosis of antibiotics to resist the effects of tetracycline hydrochloride, indicating that gut microbiota can enhance antibiotic resistance. Hence, opportunistic microorganisms can survive in the mouse gut (Horie et al. 2017). The numbers of genes related to genetic information processing, such as gene replication, transcription, translation and repair, was 14,859, accounting for 11.62% of the total genes. The annotation results revealed a large number of genes related to host diseases in the intestinal flora; 8167 such genes were identified, accounting for 6.39% of the total. Innate immunity is a significant host defence mechanism that lacks the high selection mechanisms of adaptive immunity. This observation is consistent with our findings. Interestingly, TLRs have been found to be expressed at low levels in the gut of Drosophila melanogaster (Broderick and Lemaitre 2012). Many studies have shown that the correlations between microbial community composition and inflammatory parameters can serve as biological indicators of diseases (Becattini et al. 2016). Lactobacillaceae and Enterobacteriaceae, the dominant bacteria at the family level, play important roles in assisting the host breakdown of carbohydrates and ferment sugars to maintain host nutrition and metabolism. At the genus level, Lactobacillus and Escherichia were observed at high abundance. Lactobacillus, as a beneficial bacterium, act as a barrier against foreign invaders, inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria and synthesises vitamins and amino acids for host, maintaining a dynamic balance of gut microbes. This bacterium also plays an important role in tumour inhibition; in some hosts with disease, Lactobacillus abundance in the gut is decreased (Azad et al. 2018).

In addition, genes regulating cell processes were identified in the intestinal flora. The number of genes regulating cell growth and apoptosis was 1324, representing 1.04% of the genes. The number of genes regulating cell movement was 1336, representing 1.05% of the total. The number of genes regulating the cell community was 3542, representing 2.77%. The number of genes regulating the transport and catabolism of cells was 1004, representing 79%. The number of genes related to biological systems was 3849, representing 3.01% of the total genes. In addition, in this functional category, the number of genes related to the endocrine system was 1372, accounting for 1.07% of the total.

In this study, we identified the complex population structure of the intestinal microbiota of sables based on metagenomic sequencing methods, which use whole metagenomic data, and we mapped the obtained sequences to known genes or pathways in existing databases, such as CAZy, KEGG, and eggNOG. We then explored the genetic composition and functional diversity of the microbial community based on the mapped functional categories.

Availability of data and materials

All the raw sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive, under Accession Number SRP265006.

References

  1. Antunes KH, Fachi JL, de Paula R, da Silva EF, Pral LP, dos Santos A, Dias GBM, Vargas JE, Puga R, Mayer FQ, Maito F, Zárate-Bladés CR, Ajami NJ, Sant’Ana MR, Candreva T, Rodrigues HG, Schmiele M, Silva Clerici MTP, Proença-Modena JL, Vieira AT, Mackay CR, Mansur D, Caballero MT, Marzec J, Li J, Wang X, Bell D, Polack FP, Kleeberger SR, Stein RT, Vinolo MAR, de Souza APD (2019) Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infection through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat Commun 10 (1):3273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11152-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azad MAK, Sarker M, Li T, Yin J (2018) Probiotic Species in the Modulation of Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Biomed Res Int 2018:9478630–9478630. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9478630

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bang S-J, Kim G, Lim MY, Song E-J, Jung D-H, Kum J-S, Nam Y-D, Park C-S, Seo D-H (2018) The influence of in vitro pectin fermentation on the human fecal microbiome. AMB Express 8 (1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0629-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becattini S, Taur Y, Pamer EG (2016) Antibiotic-Induced Changes in the Intestinal Microbiota and Disease. Trends in Molecular Medicine 22 (6):458–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2016.04.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blakeley-Ruiz JA, Erickson AR, Cantarel BL, Xiong W, Adams R, Jansson JK, Fraser CM, Hettich RL (2019) Metaproteomics reveals persistent and phylum-redundant metabolic functional stability in adult human gut microbiomes of Crohn’s remission patients despite temporal variations in microbial taxa, genomes, and proteomes. Microbiome 7 (1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0631-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Broderick NA, Lemaitre B (2012) Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes 3 (4):307–321. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19896

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brum J, IgnacioEspinoza JC, Roux S, Doulcier G, Acinas S, Alberti A, Chaffron S, Cruaud C, Vargas C, Gasol J, Gorsky G, Gregory A, Guidi L, Hingamp P, Iudicone D, Not F, Ogata H, Pesant S, Poulos B, Sullivan M (2015) Ocean planktonPatterns and ecological drivers of ocean viral communities. Science 34:8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261498

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH (2015) Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12 (1):59–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Di P, Wang H, Li B, Pan Y, Yan S, Wang Y (2015) Bacterial Community Associated with the Intestinal Tract of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) Farmed in Lake Tai, China. PLOS ONE 10 (4):e0123990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123990

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JH, Kim GB, Cha CJ (2014) Spatial heterogeneity and stability of bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 93 (8):1942–1950. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119384640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Consortium (2012) Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486 (7402):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11234

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Mandal S, Singh SS, Muthukumaran RB, Thanzami K, Kumar V, Kumar NS (2018) Metagenomic analysis and the functional profiles of traditional fermented pork fat ‘sa-um’ of Northeast India. AMB Express 8 (1):163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0695-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng Y, Cheng C, Xie J, Liu S, Ma H, Feng J, Su Y, Guo Z (2019) Coupled changes of bacterial community and function in the gut of mud crab (Scylla Paramamosain) in response to Baimang disease. AMB Express 9 (1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0745-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong J, Li X, Zhang R, Zhao Y, Wu G, Liu J, Zhu X, Li L (2018) Comparative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community and expression of gut immunity genes in the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis). AMB Express 8 (1):192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0722-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doulberis M, Angelopoulou K, Kaldrymidou E, Tsingotjidou A, Abas Z, Erdman SE, Poutahidis T (2015) Cholera-toxin suppresses carcinogenesis in a mouse model of inflammation-driven sporadic colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 36 (2):280–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgu325

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Federici M (2019) Gut microbiome and microbial metabolites: a new system affecting metabolic disorders. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-019-01022-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng Q, Liang S, Jia H, Stadlmayr A, Tang L, Lan Z, Zhang D, Xia H, Xu X, Jie Z, Su L, Li X, Li X, Li J, Xiao L, Huber-Schönauer U, Niederseer D, Xu X, Al-Aama JY, Yang H, Wang J, Kristiansen K, Arumugam M, Tilg H, Datz C, Wang J (2015) Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Nat Commun 6 (1):6528. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7528

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao Y, Yang L, Chin Y, Liu F, Li RW, Yuan S, Xue C, Xu J, Tang Q (2020) Astaxanthin n-Octanoic Acid Diester Ameliorates Insulin Resistance and Modulates Gut Microbiota in High-Fat and High-Sucrose Diet-Fed Mice. Int J Mol Sci 21 (6):2149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062149

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, Gordon JI, Relman DA, Fraser-Liggett CM, Nelson KE (2006) Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312 (5778):1355–1359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124234

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grieneisen LE, Charpentier ME, Alberts SC, Blekhman R, Bradburd G, Tung J, Archie EA (2019) Genes, geology and germs: gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species. Proc Biol Sci 286 (1901):20190431–20190431. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0431

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guan Y, Zhang H, Gao X, Shang S, Wu X, Chen J, Zhang W, Zhang W, Jiang M, Zhang B, Chen P (2016) Comparison of the bacterial communities in feces from wild versus housed sables (Martes zibellina) by high-throughput sequence analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. AMB Express 6 (1):98–98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27734418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hale VL, Tan CL, Niu K, Yang Y, Zhang Q, Knight R, Amato KR (2019) Gut microbiota in wild and captive Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys, Rhinopithecus brelichi. Am J Primatol 81 (10–11):e22989. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22989

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasan AU, Rahman A, Kobori H (2019) Interactions between Host PPARs and Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci 20 (2):387. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30658440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill JH, Franzosa EA, Huttenhower C, Guillemin K (2016) A conserved bacterial protein induces pancreatic beta cell expansion during zebrafish development. Elife 5:e20145. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20145

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horie M, Miura T, Hirakata S, Hosoyama A, Sugino S, Umeno A, Murotomi K, Yoshida Y, Koike T (2017) Comparative analysis of the intestinal flora in type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic mice. Exp Anim 66 (4):405–416. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.17-0021

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huson D, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H-J, Weber N, Schuster S (2011) Integrative Analysis of Environmental Sequences Using MEGAN4. Genome research 21:1552–1560. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.120618.111

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jain A, Li XH, Chen WN (2018) Similarities and differences in gut microbiome composition correlate with dietary patterns of Indian and Chinese adults. AMB Express 8 (1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0632-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jang S-E, Jeong J-J, Kim J-K, Han MJ, Kim D-H (2018) Simultaneous Amelioratation of Colitis and Liver Injury in Mice by Bifidobacterium longum LC67 and Lactobacillus plantarum LC27. Scientific reports 8 (1):7500–7500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25775-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson G (2019) High throughput DNA extraction of legume root nodules for rhizobial metagenomics. AMB Express 9 (1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0771-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergström G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, Nielsen J, Bäckhed F (2013) Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498 (7452):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12198

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krone CL, Biesbroek G, Trzciński K, Sanders EAM, Bogaert D (2014) Respiratory Microbiota Dynamics following Streptococcus pneumoniae Acquisition in Young and Elderly. Mice Infect Immun 82 (4):1725. http://iai.asm.org/content/82/4/1725.abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li B, Malyarchuk B, Ma Z, Derenko M, Zhao J, Zhou X (2013) Phylogeography of sable (Martes zibellina L 1758) in the southeast portion of its range based on mitochondrial DNA variation: Highlighting the evolutionary history of the sable. Acta Theriol 58:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0100-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li J, Jia H, Cai X, Zhong H, Feng Q, Sunagawa S, Arumugam M, Kultima JR, Prifti E, Nielsen T, Juncker AS, Manichanh C, Chen B, Zhang W, Levenez F, Wang J, Xu X, Xiao L, Liang S, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Chen W, Zhao H, Al-Aama JY, Edris S, Yang H, Wang J, Hansen T, Nielsen HB, Brunak S, Kristiansen K, Guarner F, Pedersen O, Doré J, Ehrlich SD, Pons N, Le Chatelier E, Batto J-M, Kennedy S, Haimet F, Winogradski Y, Pelletier E, LePaslier D, Artiguenave F, Bruls T, Weissenbach J, Turner K, Parkhill J, Antolin M, Casellas F, Borruel N, Varela E, Torrejon A, Denariaz G, Derrien M, van H Vlieg, Viega JET, Oozeer P, Knoll R, Rescigno J, Brechot M, M’Rini C, Mérieux C, Yamada A, Tims T, Zoetendal S, Kleerebezem EG, de Vos M, Cultrone WM, Leclerc A, Juste M, Guedon C, Delorme E, Layec C, Khaci S, van de Guchte G, Vandemeulebrouck M, Jamet G, Dervyn A, Sanchez R, Blottière N, Maguin H, Renault E, Tap P, Mende J, Bork DR, Wang P, Meta J HITC (2014) An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 32 (8):834–841. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2942

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li S, Wang Z, Yang Y, Yang S, Yao C, Liu K, Cui S, Zou Q, Sun H, Guo G (2017) Lachnospiraceae shift in the microbial community of mice faecal sample effects on water immersion restraint stress. AMB Express 7 (1):82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0383-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li X, Liang S, Xia Z, Qu J, Liu H, Liu C, Yang H, Wang J, Madsen L, Hou Y, Li J, Jia H, Kristiansen K, Xiao L (2018) Establishment of a Macaca fascicularis gut microbiome gene catalog and comparison with the human, pig, and mouse gut microbiomes. GigaScience 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy100

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li X, Yin J, Zhu Y, Wang X, Hu X, Bao W, Huang Y, Chen L, Chen S, Yang W, Shan Z, Liu L (2018b) Effects of Whole Milk Supplementation on Gut Microbiota and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Subjects with and without Lactose Malabsorption. Nutrients 10 (10):1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101403

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Z, Si H, Nan W, Wang X, Zhang T, Li G (2019) Bacterial community and metabolome shifts in the cecum and colon of captive sika deer (Cervus nippon) from birth to post weaning. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:4. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu Y, Zheng Z, Yu L, Wu S, Sun L, Wu S, Xu Q, Cai S, Qin N, Bao W (2019) Examination of the temporal and spatial dynamics of the gut microbiome in newborn piglets reveals distinct microbial communities in six intestinal segments. Sci Rep 9 (1):3453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40235-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu S-M, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam T-W, Wang J (2012) SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1 (1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-18

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma C, Chen C, Jia L, He X, Zhang B (2019) Comparison of the intestinal microbiota composition and function in healthy and diseased Yunlong Grouper. AMB Express 9 (1):187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0913-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin TC, Visconti A, Spector TD, Falchi M (2018) Conducting metagenomic studies in microbiology and clinical research. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 102 (20):8629–8646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9209-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mende D, Waller A, Sunagawa S, Järvelin A, Chan M, Arumugam M, Raes J, Bork P (2012) Assessment of Metagenomic Assembly Using Simulated Next Generation Sequencing Data. PloS one 7:e31386. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031386

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Michail S, Lin M, Frey MR, Fanter R, Paliy O, Hilbush B, Reo NV (2014) Altered gut microbial energy and metabolism in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91 (2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiu002

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Monakhov VG, Modorov MV, Ranyuk MN (2018) Genetic Effects of Sable (Martes zibellina L.) Reintroduction in Western Siberia. Russian Journal of Genetics 54 (3):358–362. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795418030079

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mustonen A-M, Nieminen P (2006) Fatty acid composition in the central and peripheral adipose tissues of the sable (Martes zibellina). J Therm Biol 31:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2006.08.004

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mustonen A-M, Puukka M, Seppo S, Paakkonen T, Aho J, Nieminen P (2006) Adaptations to fasting in a terrestrial mustelid, the sable (Martes zibellina). Compar Biochem Physiol Part A 144:444–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.03.008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Oliphant K, Allen-Vercoe E (2019) Macronutrient metabolism by the human gut microbiome: major fermentation by-products and their impact on host health. Microbiome 7 (1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0704-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pan J, Yin J, Zhang K, Xie P, Ding H, Huang X, Blachier F, Kong X (2019) Dietary xylo-oligosaccharide supplementation alters gut microbial composition and activity in pigs according to age and dose. AMB Express 9 (1):134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0858-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pekkala S, Lensu S, Nokia M, Vanhatalo S, Koch LG, Britton SL, Kainulainen H (2017) Intrinsic aerobic capacity governs the associations between gut microbiota composition and fat metabolism age-dependently in rat siblings. Physiol Genomics 49 (12):733–746. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00081.2017

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto J-M, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Li S, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Doré J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J, Antolin M, Artiguenave F, Blottiere H, Borruel N, Bruls T, Casellas F, Chervaux C, Cultrone A, Delorme C, Denariaz G, Dervyn R, Forte M, Friss C, van de Guchte M, Guedon E, Haimet F, Jamet A, Juste C, Kaci G, Kleerebezem M, Knol J, Kristensen M, Layec S, Le Roux K, Leclerc M, Maguin E, Melo Minardi R, Oozeer R, Rescigno M, Sanchez N, Tims S, Torrejon T, Varela E, de Vos W, Winogradsky Y, Zoetendal E, Bork P, Ehrlich SD, Wang J, Meta HITC (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464 (7285):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08821

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto J-M, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2012) A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490 (7418):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11450

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Qin N, Yang F, Li A, Prifti E, Chen Y, Shao L, Guo J, Le Chatelier E, Yao J, Wu L, Zhou J, Ni S, Liu L, Pons N, Batto JM, Kennedy SP, Leonard P, Yuan C, Ding W, Chen Y, Hu X, Zheng B, Qian G, Xu W, Ehrlich SD, Zheng S, Li L (2014) Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513:59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13568

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Robertson RC, Kaliannan K, Strain CR, Ross RP, Stanton C, Kang JX (2018) Maternal omega-3 fatty acids regulate offspring obesity through persistent modulation of gut microbiota. Microbiome 6 (1):95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0476-6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, Segata N, Ubeda C, Bielski C, Rostron T, Cerundolo V, Pamer EG, Abramson SB, Huttenhower C, Littman DR (2013) Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife 2:e01202–e01202. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01202.001

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Shui Y, Guan Z-B, Liu G-F, Fan L-M (2020) Gut microbiota of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in integrated crayfish-rice cultivation model. AMB Express 10 (1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0944-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Si J, Feng L, Gao J, Huang Y, Zhang G, Mo J, Zhu S, Qi W, Liang J, Lan G (2020) Evaluating the association between feed efficiency and the fecal microbiota of early-life Duroc pigs using 16S rRNA sequencing. AMB Express 10 (1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01050-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Srugo SA, Bloise E, Nguyen TT-TN, Connor KL (2019) Impact of Maternal Malnutrition on Gut Barrier Defense: Implications for Pregnancy Health and Fetal Development. Nutrients 11 (6):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061375

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Svishcheva GR, Kashtanov SN (2011) Reproductive strategy of the sable (Martes zibellina Linnaeus, 1758): An analysis of litter size inheritance in farm-raised populations. Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research 1 (3):221–225. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059711030129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Taha-Abdelaziz K, Yitbarek A, Alkie TN, Hodgins DC, Read LR, Weese JS, Sharif S (2018) PLGA-encapsulated CpG ODN and Campylobacter jejuni lysate modulate cecal microbiota composition in broiler chickens experimentally challenged with C. jejuni. Sci Rep 8 (1):12076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30510-w

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tully BJ, Graham ED, Heidelberg JF (2018) The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Scientific Data 5:170203. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.203

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Villar E, Farrant GK, Follows M, Garczarek L, Speich S, Audic S, Bittner L, Blanke B, Brum JR, Brunet C, Casotti R, Chase A, Dolan JR, Ortenzio F, Gattuso J-P, Grima N, Guidi L, Hill CN, Jahn O, Jamet J-L, Le Goff H, Lepoivre C, Malviya S, Pelletier E, Romagnan J-B, Roux S, Santini S, Scalco E, Schwenck SM, Tanaka A, Testor P, Vannier T, Vincent F, Zingone A, Dimier C, Picheral M, Searson S, Kandels-Lewis S, Acinas SG, Bork P, Boss E, de Vargas C, Gorsky G, Ogata H, Pesant S, Sullivan MB, Sunagawa S, Wincker P, Karsenti E, Bowler C, Not F, Hingamp P, Iudicone D (2015) Environmental characteristics of Agulhas rings affect interocean plankton transport. Science 348 (6237):1261447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wong S, Rawls JF (2012) Intestinal microbiota composition in fishes is influenced by host ecology and environment. Mol Ecol 21 (13):3100–3102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05646.x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu Q, Wang X, Ding Y, Hu Y, Nie Y, Wei W, Ma S, Yan L, Zhu L, Wei F (2017a) Seasonal variation in nutrient utilization shapes gut microbiome structure and function in wild giant pandas. Proc Biol Sci 284 (1862):20170955. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0955

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wu X, Zhang H, Chen J, Shang S, Yan J, Chen Y, Tang X, Zhang H (2017b) Analysis and comparison of the wolf microbiome under different environmental factors using three different data of Next Generation Sequencing. Sci Rep 7 (1):11332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11770-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Xu C, Liu J, Gao J, Wu X, Cui C, Wei H, Zheng R, Peng J (2020) Combined Soluble Fiber-Mediated Intestinal Microbiota Improve Insulin Sensitivity of Obese Mice. Nutrients 12 (2):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020351

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Xue Z, Zhang J, Zhang R, Huang Z, Wan Q, Zhang Z (2019) Comparative analysis of gut bacterial communities in housefly larvae fed different diets using a high-throughput sequencing approach. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:11. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ye H, Liu J, Feng P, Zhu W, Mao S (2016) Grain-rich diets altered the colonic fermentation and mucosa-associated bacterial communities and induced mucosal injuries in goats. Scientific reports 6:20329–20329. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20329

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeller G, Tapy J, Voigt A, Sunagawa S, Kultima J, Costea P, Amiot A, Böhm J, Brunetti F, Habermann N, Hercog R, Koch M, Luciani A, Mende D, Schneider M, Schrotz-King P, Tournigand C, TranVanNhieu J, Yamada T, Bork P (2014) Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer. Mol Syst Biol 10:12. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145645

  69. Zhou L, Lin K-T, Gan L, Sun J-J, Guo C-J, Liu L, Huang X-d (2019) Intestinal Microbiota of Grass Carp Fed Faba Beans: A Comparative Study. Microorganisms 7 (10):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100465

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhu H, Zeng D, Wang N, Niu L-l, Zhou Y, Zeng Y, Ni X-q (2018) Microbial community and diversity in the feces of Sichuan takin (Budorcas taxicolor tibetana) as revealed by Illumina Miseq sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR. AMB Express 8 (1):68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0599-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Funding

The National Natural Science Fund of China.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to this research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghai Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was carried out in compliance with the current laws in China.

Consent for publication

The written informed consent forms were taken from the volunteers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, J., Wu, X., Chen, J. et al. Harnessing the strategy of metagenomics for exploring the intestinal microecology of sable (Martes zibellina), the national first-level protected animal. AMB Expr 10, 169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01103-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sable (Martes zibellina)
  • Metagenomics
  • Gut microbiota
  • Functional database
  • Gene function annotation