Skip to main content

Dynamics of Clostridium genus and hard-cheese spoiling Clostridium species in anaerobic digesters treating agricultural biomass


Biogas plants are a widespread renewable energy technology. However, the use of digestate for agronomic purposes has often been a matter of concern. It is controversial whether biogas plants might harbor some pathogenic clostridial species, which represent a biological risk. Moreover, the inhabitance of Clostridium hard-cheese spoiling species in anaerobic digesters can be problematic for hard-cheese manufacturing industries, due to the issue of cheese blowing defects. This study investigated the effect of mesophilic anaerobic digestion processes on the Clostridium consortia distribution over time. Specifically, three lab-scale CSTRs treating agricultural biomass were characterized by considering both the whole microbial community and the cultivable clostridial spores. It is assessed an overall reduction of the Clostridium genus during the anaerobic digestion process. Moreover, it was evidenced a slight, but steady decrease of the cultivable clostridial spores, mainly represented by two pathogenic species, C. perfringens and C. bifermentans, and one hard-cheese spoiling species, C. butyricum. Thus, it is revealed an overall reduction of the clostridial population abundance after the mesophilic anaerobic digestion treatment of agricultural biomass.


The number of anaerobic digestion (AD) plants is increasing, and the digestate by-product is generally distributed to farmlands for agronomic purposes. To this extent, we must consider the biological risks associated to the digestate spreading. Indeed, the biological process of AD cannot totally prevent the recontamination and regrowth of pathogenic bacteria. Most spore-forming pathogenic bacteria, such as Clostridium spp., are normally present in soil or animal feces; therefore, cattle manure or slurry sent to agricultural biogas plants can include spores of pathogenic bacteria (Bagge et al. 2005). Previous studies have indicated the reduction of some species of Clostridium after the AD process. Fröschle et al. (2015) highlighted the reduction of C. botulinum in mesophilic and thermophilic biogas digesters by means of microbial enrichment and Real-Time PCR techniques, indicating an improved sanitary quality of the digestion product compared to untreated substrates. However, they also observed a high persistence of the pathogenic C. difficile in manure-based AD treatments, whereas a minor relevance was given to the less abundant species of C. chauvoei, C. haemolyticum, C. septicum and C. novyi (Fröschle et al. 2015). Another research based on culture-dependent methods, evidenced the reduction of the pathogen indicator C. perfringens after mesophilic AD, in relation to the values of pH (8.3 ± 0.2) and toxic ammonia (2.9 ± 1.4 g kg−1) (Orzi et al. 2015).

In addition to the health risks related to the farming activity of spreading digestate as fertilizer, there are other concerns associated with the cheese-making process in Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) areas located in Northern Italy. Specifically, the presence of some species of Clostridium could be damaging for hard-cheese manufacturing industries which utilize local biogas plants for energy recovery. Indeed, three species of Clostridium, namely C. tyrobutyricum, C. butyricum, and C. sporogenes, are known to cause blowing defects in hard cheeses (Bassi et al. 2015). This issue causes cheese spoilage and thus, the loss of the final product with the related economic implications.

Clostridium spp. are known to be among the main players during the hydrolytic and acidogenic phases of AD (Fontana et al. 2016). Therefore, it is important to assess whether some clostridial species in the digestate from agricultural biogas plants might represent a biological risk considering both agronomic practices and food industry processes. Currently, the mechanisms of pathogenic decay via AD are not fully understood. Operating conditions strongly affect the relative abundance of pathogenic microorganisms by enriching or inhibiting them, depending on the species (Sahlström et al. 2008; Li et al. 2015; Ju et al. 2016). For instance, spore-forming species within the Clostridium and Bacillus genera are generally resistant to environmental stresses and high temperature conditions. Thus, they can survive thermophilic AD treatments (Dixit et al. 2005; Lloret et al. 2013). In addition to temperature, other factors affect the inactivation of pathogens. For example, the concentrations of ammonia and volatile fatty acids (VFAs), pH, and hydraulic retention time (Zhao and Liu 2019). However, many other AD variables play roles in the pathogenic decay or loss of diversity, such as the availability of nutrients and the operation modes of the reactors (e.g., batch or continuous) (Sahlström et al. 2008; Zhao and Liu 2019). Previous studies have provided contradictory data regarding the impact of AD on the Clostridium spp. It was generally reported that Clostridium consortia were not affected by the AD process (Bagge et al. 2005; Schnürer and Jarvis 2010). However, some case studies have detected a reduction in those consortia, depending on specific process conditions (e.g., low pH, high VFAs, high temperatures) (Bagge et al. 2005; Salsali et al. 2008; Orzi et al. 2015).

The present study performed an in-depth investigation about the effect of the mesophilic anaerobic digestion process on the Clostridium consortia, over time. Specifically, we evaluated the abundance of the Clostridium genus inside the digesters, by characterizing the whole microbial community via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Moreover, cultivable clostridial spores were identified at the species level by Sanger sequencing the complete 16S rRNA gene. Thus, we revealed the impact of the mesophilic AD process on the spreading of both pathogenic and hard-cheese spoiling Clostridium spp., considering agricultural and dairy industry environments.

Materials and methods

Operating parameters of lab-scale reactors

Three 16 L lab-scale Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTRs), operating under the same conditions (biological replicates), were used to carry out anaerobic digestion tests (Giorni et al. 2018). The reactors were daily fed with a mixture commonly used in agricultural biogas plants, namely 45% cattle slurry, 10% maize flour and 45% maize silage, and run under mesophilic conditions (40 ± 0.2 °C). The hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 47 days and the organic loading rate (OLR) was 4 kg VS/m3 day. These process parameters were chosen in relation to the characteristics of the substrates (Additional file 1: Table S1). Tests lasted 3 months and started by introducing digestate in each reactor as inoculum taken from an agricultural biogas plant.

Physico-chemical analyses

The pH was measured by a bench pH meter (XS instruments). Total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), ammonium concentration (NH4+—N) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs), were measured as described in standard methods (APHA 2005). Total acidity and FOS/TAC were determined as described by Nordmann (1977) through an automatic titrator (TIM 840, Hach Lange). FOS represents the volatile organic acids content (mg/LHAc), while TAC stands for the total inorganic carbon (basic buffer capacity) (mg CaCO3/dm3). Methane content in the biogas was measured by a portable biogas analyzer (GA2000 PLUS, Geotechnical Instruments, UK). Determination of the inoculum methane yield as biochemical methane potential (BMP) was performed in accordance with the standard ISO 11734.

DNA extraction for Illumina sequencing

DNA was extracted from 200 mg of sample using the Fast DNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration was determined with the Quant-iT dsDNA HS assay kit and the Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The quality of the extracted DNA was checked with agarose gel electrophoresis, and then sent to the sequencing facility for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V3-V4 regions) using the Illumina MiSeq technology (2 × 300 bp). The microbial community composition of the three reactors was investigated in the inoculum and the reactor digestate at two time-points, representing the start-up phase (day 10) and steady-state condition (day 64).

Bioinformatics and statistical analyses

Bioinformatics and statistics on the Illumina reads were performed with QIIME 2 2018.8 (Bolyen et al. 2018). Raw sequence data were demultiplexed and quality filtered using the q2‐demux plugin followed by denoising with DADA2 (Callahan et al. 2016). Alpha‐diversity metrics (observed OTUs, Shannon and evenness), beta-diversity metric unweighted UniFrac (Lozupone and Knight 2005) and PCoA were estimated using q2‐diversity after samples were rarefied (subsampled without replacement) to 30,000 sequences per sample. Taxonomy was assigned to OTUs using the q2‐feature‐classifier (Bokulich et al. 2018) classify‐sklearn naïve Bayes taxonomy classifier against the Greengenes 13_8 99% OTUs reference sequences (McDonald et al. 2012). Heat map representing genera relative abundances was visualized using MeV (Saeed et al. 2003). Statistical analyses to identify significance of changes in genera relative abundance between the inoculum, start-up and steady-state conditions, were carried out using STAMP software (Parks and Beiko 2010). Raw reads were deposited in Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (BioProject accession number PRJNA602414).

Clostridial spores cultivation and DNA extraction for Sanger sequencing

To identify the more resistant and abundant clostridia at species level, the full-length 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Sanger technology. More specifically, the cultivable clostridia were quantified by counting the spores on Reinforced Clostridial Medium (RCM) supplemented with 0.2 g/L of cycloserine and 0.05 g/L of neutral red solution as described by Jonsson (1990). The spore counts were done for the inoculum, feedstock, and reactor digestate, at the start-up (day 10) and steady-state conditions (day 64). Approximately 10% of the grown colonies was isolated and the DNA was extracted with MicroLYSIS® PLUS (Labogen, London, UK). Full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers P0 (5′-GAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3′) and P6 (5′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTAC-3′) (Di Cello and Fani 1996); the PCR product was then purified and sequenced. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test on the microbiological count data were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.


Reactor performance

The physico-chemical characteristics of the inoculum and the digestates, along with reactor performance data, are reported in Table 1. The average methane yield of the three replicate reactors was 339.3 ± 1.4 Nm3 CH4/t VS at the steady-state condition, with 53.7 ± 0.3% of methane content in the biogas. The average pH value of the digestates was 7.70 ± 0.05 during processing in all three reactors, with an average FOS/TAC ratio of 0.28 ± 0.02. The total acidity was mainly due to acetate and butyrate in the inoculum, but acetate was the main VFA in the start-up and steady-state phases. Specifically, the acetate concentration decreased during the reactor start-up phase, then remaining constant until steady-state condition (Table 1). The same trend was observed for the ammonium concentration.

Table 1 Physico-chemical characteristics of the inoculum and the reactor digestate at the start-up and steady-state conditions

Microbial community diversity

We sequenced the 16S rRNA gene amplicon to follow dynamic adaptations and selections within the entire microbial community in the inoculum and in the digestates at the reactor start-up and steady-state conditions. Microbial selection occurred at the OTU level, due to the digester operating conditions. Specifically, the α-diversity analysis indexes (i.e., observed OTUs, Shannon index, evenness) revealed a significantly different microbial community during the steady-state phase, compared to the initial inoculum and the start-up phase. In particular, the microbiota at the steady-state condition was less biodiverse (i.e., lower OTU richness) than at the start-up phase and the inoculum (Fig. 1a). In contrast, the OTU evenness (i.e., Pielou’s index) was not significantly different between time points. A principle coordinate analysis for testing β-diversity also highlighted the strong OTU composition changes between the inoculum, the start-up phase, and the steady-state condition (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1

α-diversity plots. a Observed OTUs, Shannon index and Pielou’s index. b Principle coordinate analysis of the OTU distribution in the inoculum (orange dots) and in the three reactor replicates, during the start-up phase (red dots) and during steady-state conditions (blue dots)

Microbial community taxonomy

Taxonomic classification showed that the Archaea population (Euryarchaeota phylum) increased by an average of 4% at the steady-state, compared to both the inoculum and the start-up phase (Fig. 2). This increase was specifically observed in the genus Methanosaeta, which became the main archaea, along with Methanosarcina, at the steady-state. On the contrary, Methanobrevibacter genus, which accounted for 1.8% and 0.7% in the inoculum and at the start-up phase, respectively, nearly disappeared at the reactors’ steady-state (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 2

Taxonomy bar-plot shows the relative abundance of OTUs at the phylum level. Different OTU abundances are shown in the inoculum and in the reactor digestate, during start-up and steady-state conditions

Fig. 3

Heat map shows the relative abundance of the genera in the inoculum, the reactor start-up phase, and steady-state conditions. Only genera with relative abundances > 1% are represented

Concerning the Bacteria population, the dominant phylum was Firmicutes, in both the inoculum and the reactor at the start-up phase (~ 80% relative abundance). The Bacteroidetes abundance ranged between 4% (inoculum) and 8% (start-up) (Fig. 2); however, during steady state, it reached ~ 45% relative abundance, whereas Firmicutes decreased to ~ 40% (Fig. 2). Within the Firmicutes phylum, the Clostridium genus strongly decreased, from a relative abundance of ~ 9% at the start-up phase, to ~ 2% at steady-state (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Among the identified genera, Clostridium exhibited the most significant reduction (p < 0.05) in relative abundance (Fig. 4). However, a sharp reduction was also observed in the genera Turicibacter, Caldicoprobacter, Butyrivibrio, and Coprococcus. Conversely, the Syntrophomonas genus, which also belongs to Firmicutes, exhibited a sharp increase at the steady-state condition (Fig. 3 and S1). Considering the Bacteroidetes phylum, the main increase was observed in the Bacteroidales order (Fig. 3 and S1). Among the less abundant phyla, Actinobacteria (including the genera Corynebacterium and Actinomyces) and Proteobacteria nearly disappeared at the steady-state (Fig. 2). In contrast, the candidate phylum, Waste Water of Evry 1 (WWE1) slightly increased (Fig. 2); within this phylum, two genera were evidenced: BHB21 and W5 (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 4

Genera that changed significantly (p < 0.05) during the steady-state, compared to the start-up phase. No statistically significant changes are observed between genera compositions in the start-up phase and the inoculum

Identification of cultivable Clostridium spores

This study was focused on the Clostridium population dynamics during the AD process. Therefore, we also evaluated the abundance and identity of the cultivable clostridial spores. Specifically, the inoculum contained 1.5 × 104 CFU/g of spores, whereas the feedstock contained 2.1 × 103 CFU/g of spores (mainly in the cattle slurry component). In the reactor digestate, the clostridial spore concentration slightly decreased to 3.1 × 103 CFU/g at the start-up phase and remained at 3.9 × 103 CFU/g at the steady-state condition (Fig. 5a). A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test showed that the spore contents were significantly different (p = 0.0007) between the inoculum and the reactor digestate, at both time points. Sanger sequencing revealed that the dominant species among the cultivated clostridia where C. perfringens (92%), C. bifermentans (4%), and C. butyricum (4%) (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5

Cultivable Clostridium spores. a Spore counts in the inoculum and in the reactor digestate at start-up and in steady-state conditions. Letters in the graph indicate significant differences between samples, based on Tukey’s test. b Identification and relative abundance of the isolated Clostridium spores


Considering the reactor performance, both VFAs (mainly acetate) and ammonium compounds were not at concentrations that might inhibit the AD process (Chen et al. 2008; Fotidis et al. 2013), as also evidenced by the maintenance of the methane yield along the process. According to the characterization of the microbiota inside the reactors, it was experienced a microbial shift in terms of OTUs diversity at the steady-state, compared to the initial inoculum and the start-up phase. The decrease in biodiversity along the process was also pointed out in different studies (Lavergne et al. 2019; Cabezas et al. 2019; Castelló et al. 2011). This fact indicates that, in AD reactors, microbial diversity mainly relies on the inoculum. Moreover, the selection operated by the feed characteristics (i.e., pH, alkalinity, buffer capacity) on specific microbial consortia has been also pointed out (Fontana et al. 2018).

It is worth noting that the microbial composition change between the start-up and the steady-state condition did not affect the biogas production efficiency. The shift showed within the archaeal population indicated a variation of the undertaken methanogenic pathway at the steady-state: from hydrogenotrophic to acetoclastic. Indeed, at the taxonomic level, it was evidenced that the acetoclastic methanogenic genera Methanosaeta and Methanosarcina took over the hydrogenotrophic Methanobrevibacter genus. The selection of acetoclastic methanogens under mesophilic conditions was also observed in full-scale agricultural biogas plants (Campanaro et al. 2016; Fontana et al. 2016). This could be due to the presence of acetate as main VFA produced from the degradation of agricultural biomass.

On the other hand, the methane yield increase exhibited from the inoculum to the start-up phase may be reasonably due to the adaptation of the methanogenic consortia to the operating conditions of the reactors.

Regarding the Bacteria population, the dominance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla was assessed in different AD systems for degrading various feedstocks (Fontana et al. 2016; Schlüter et al. 2008; Sundberg et al. 2013). Moreover, the main presence of Bacteroidales order within the Bacteroidetes phylum, was showed in most mesophilic AD processes with low concentrations of VFAs, total ammonia, and salt (Rivière et al. 2009; Nelson et al. 2011). Considering instead less abundant phyla, the increase in the WWE1 candidate phylum over time was also described in a mixed plug-flow loop reactor fed with dairy manure (Li et al. 2014). This phylum includes members that can degrade cellulose substrates (Limam et al. 2014); thus, it might play a key role in full-scale CSTRs fed with maize-silage or other energy crops rich in cellulose. What is worth noting regards one among the main genera in AD, belonging to the Firmicutes phylum: Clostridium. Indeed, it was exhibited a sharp reduction in Clostridium spp. over time, from the inoculum and the start-up phase, to the reactor steady-state. This outcome contrasted with the results from Yergeau et al. (2016), who reported a significant increase in Clostridium DNA after the AD treatment.

Along with the Clostridium decrease, it was highlighted the increase in Syntrophomonas genus at the steady-state. Some species belonging to this genus were previously shown to be responsible for butyrate oxidation in AD (Treu et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2018). Moreover, it has also been reported that some Syntrophomonas spp. could establish syntrophic associations with methanogens (e.g., Syntrophomonas wolfei) (Sieber et al. 2010). Thus, the low levels of butyrate (i.e., below the 50 mg/kg detection limit) in the system during the reactor steady-state might have been related to the increment in Syntrophomonas spp., along with the strong reduction in butyrate-producers, such as Clostridium spp. (Detman et al. 2019). The count of the cultivable clostridial spores confirmed the trend in relative abundance of the Clostridium genus observed with the amplicon sequencing approach. Thus, it is suggested that the mesophilic AD treatment caused a slight, but steady reduction also in the abundance of cultivable clostridial spores. Orzi et al. (2015) also reported the decrease of the pathogen indicator C. perfringens in mesophilic plants. However, we additionally revealed the presence of the pathogenic species C. bifermentans and the hard-cheese spoiling species C. butyricum, along with the dominant C. perfringens. The main presence of spores belonging to C. perfringens might be related to a higher competitiveness for carbon resources resulting in a better adaptation of the species to the mesophilic anaerobic digestion conditions (Orzi et al. 2015). However, the presence of C. butyricum, even if in lower abundance than the other cultivable spores, can suggest an issue of cross-contamination between local biogas plants and dairy facilities specialized in long-ripened cheese production.

To summarize, this study showed that the treatment of agricultural biomass via mesophilic anaerobic digestion has a reduction effect on the clostridial population at the genus level. Moreover, a slight, but steady decrease effect is also exhibited on the cultivable clostridial spores, which are mainly represented by C. perfringens, C. bifermentans and C. butyricum.

Availability of data and materials

Raw reads were deposited in Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (BioProject accession number PRJNA602414). Additional file 1.


  1. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 15th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bagge E, Sahlström L, Albihn A (2005) The effect of hygienic treatment on the microbial flora of biowaste at biogas plants. Water Res.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassi D, Puglisi E, Cocconcelli PS (2015) Understanding the bacterial communities of hard cheese with blowing defect. Food Microbiol 52:106–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley GA, Gregory Caporaso J (2018) Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2′s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolyen E, Dillon M, Bokulich N, Abnet C, Al-Ghalith (2018) QIIME 2: reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. PeerJ Prepr.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabezas A, Bovio P, Etchebehere C (2019) Commercial formulation amendment transiently affects the microbial composition but not the biogas production of a full scale methanogenic UASB reactor. Environ Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Campanaro S, Treu L, Kougias PG, De Francisci D, Valle G, Angelidaki I (2016) Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high throughput shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy. Biotechnol Biofuels.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Castelló E, Perna V, Wenzel J, Borzacconi L, Etchebehere C (2011) Microbial community composition and reactor performance during hydrogen production in a UASB reactor fed with raw cheese whey inoculated with compost. Water Sci Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Detman A, Mielecki D, Chojnacka A, Salamon A, Błaszczyk MK, Sikora A (2019) Cell factories converting lactate and acetate to butyrate: Clostridium butyricum and microbial communities from dark fermentation bioreactors. Microb Cell Fact.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Cello F, Fani R (1996) A molecular strategy for the study of natural bacterial communities by PCR-based techniques. Minerva Biotecnol 8:126–134

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dixit A, Alam SI, Dhaked RK, Singh L (2005) Sporulation and heat resistance of spores from a Clostridium sp. J Food Sci, RKD.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fontana A, Patrone V, Puglisi E, Morelli L, Bassi D, Garuti M, Rossi L, Cappa F (2016) Effects of geographic area, feedstock, temperature, and operating time on microbial communities of six full-scale biogas plants. Bioresour Technol 218:980–990.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontana A, Campanaro S, Treu L, Kougias PG, Cappa F, Morelli L, Angelidaki I (2018) Performance and genome-centric metagenomics of thermophilic single and two-stage anaerobic digesters treating cheese wastes. Water Res 18(134):181–191.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fotidis IA, Karakashev D, Kotsopoulos TA, Martzopoulos GG, Angelidaki I (2013) Effect of ammonium and acetate on methanogenic pathway and methanogenic community composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fröschle B, Messelhäusser U, Höller C, Lebuhn M (2015) Fate of Clostridium botulinum and incidence of pathogenic clostridia in biogas processes. J Appl Microbiol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giorni P, Pietri A, Bertuzzi T, Soldano M, Piccinini S, Rossi L, Battilani P (2018) Fate of mycotoxins and related fungi in the anaerobic digestion process. Bioresour Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonsson A (1990) Enumeration and confirmation of Clostridium tyrobutyricum in silages using neutral red, D-Cycloserine, and lactate dehydrogenase activity. J Dairy Sci.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ju F, Li B, Ma L, Wang Y, Huang D, Zhang T (2016) Antibiotic resistance genes and human bacterial pathogens: co-occurrence, removal, and enrichment in municipal sewage sludge digesters. Water Res.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavergne C, Bovio-Winkler P, Etchebehere C, García-Gen S (2019) Towards centralized biogas plants: co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure maintains process performance and active microbiome diversity. Bioresour Technol 297:122442.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li YF, Chen PH, Yu Z (2014) Spatial and temporal variations of microbial community in a mixed plug-flow loop reactor fed with dairy manure. Microb Biotechnol.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li B, Ju F, Cai L, Zhang T (2015) Profile and fate of bacterial pathogens in sewage treatment plants revealed by high-throughput metagenomic approach. Environ Sci Technol.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Limam RD, Chouari R, Mazéas L, Di WuT, Li T, Grossin-Debattista J, Guerquin-Kern JL, Saidi M, Landoulsi A, Sghir A, Bouchez T (2014) Members of the uncultured bacterial candidate division WWE1 are implicated in anaerobic digestion of cellulose. Microbiologyopen.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lloret E, Pastor L, Pradas P, Pascual JA (2013) Semi full-scale thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAnD) for advanced treatment of sewage sludge: stabilization process and pathogen reduction. Chem Eng J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P (2012) An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z (2011) A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nordmann, W (1977) Die Überwachung der Schlammfaulung. KA-Informationen für das Betriebspersonal, Beilage zur Korrespondenz Abwasser 3 (77), 77

  30. Orzi V, Scaglia B, Lonati S, Riva C, Boccasile G, Alborali GL, Adani F (2015) The role of biological processes in reducing both odor impact and pathogen content during mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Parks DH, Beiko RG (2010) Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities. Bioinformatics.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rivière D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J, Li T, Camacho P, Sghir A (2009) Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J 3:700–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, Braisted J, Klapa M, Currier T, Thiagarajan M, Sturn A, Snuffin M, Rezantsev A, Popov D, Ryltsov A, Kostukovich E, Borisovsky I, Liu Z, Vinsavich A, Trush V, Quackenbush J (2003) TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34:374–378.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sahlström L, Bagge E, Emmoth E, Holmqvist A, Danielsson-Tham ML, Albihn A (2008) A laboratory study of survival of selected microorganisms after heat treatment of biowaste used in biogas plants. Bioresour Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salsali H, Parker WJ, Sattar SA (2008) The effect of volatile fatty acids on the inactivation of Clostridium perfringens in anaerobic digestion. World J Microbiol Biotechnol.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlüter A, Bekel T, Diaz NN, Dondrup M, Eichenlaub R, Gartemann KH, Krahn I, Krause L, Krömeke H, Kruse O, Mussgnug JH, Neuweger H, Niehaus K, Pühler A, Runte KJ, Szczepanowski R, Tauch A, Tilker A, Viehöver P, Goesmann A (2008) The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schnürer A, Jarvis A (2010) Microbiological handbook for biogas plants. Swedish Gas Cent Rep 207

  38. Sieber JR, Sims DR, Han C, Kim E, Lykidis A, Lapidus AL, McDonnald E, Rohlin L, Culley DE, Gunsalus R, McInerney MJ (2010) The genome of Syntrophomonas wolfei: new insights into syntrophic metabolism and biohydrogen production. Environ Microbiol 12:2289–2301.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sundberg C, Al-Soud WA, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta SS, Svensson BH, Sørensen SJ, Karlsson A (2013) 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85:612–626.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Treu L, Campanaro S, Kougias PG, Zhu X, Angelidaki I (2016) Untangling the effect of fatty acid addition at species level revealed different transcriptional responses of the biogas microbial community members. Environ Sci Technol 50:6079–6090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yergeau E, Masson L, Elias M, Xiang S, Madey E, Huang H, Brooks B, Beaudette LA (2016) Comparison of methods to identify pathogens and associated virulence functional genes in biosolids from two different wastewater treatment facilities in Canada. PLoS ONE.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao Q, Liu Y (2019) Is anaerobic digestion a reliable barrier for deactivation of pathogens in biosludge?. Total Environ, Sci.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Z, Li Y, Yu Q, Zhang Y (2018) Ferroferric oxide triggered possible direct interspecies electron transfer between Syntrophomonas and Methanosaeta to enhance waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


UCSC thanks Regione Lombardia and Fondazione Cariplo, which supported this work with the Cremona Agri-Food Technologies (CRAFT) project.


The Italian Ministry of Agriculture (MiPAAF) supported this work with the AGROENER project (D.D. n. 26329), together with Regione Lombardia and Fondazione Cariplo, which also supported this work with the Cremona Agri-Food Technologies (CRAFT) project.

Author information




FC and MS conceived and designed research. PB and MS conducted experiments. AF, MS and FC analyzed data. AF and MS wrote the manuscript. CF, FG and LM revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Fontana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fontana, A., Soldano, M., Bellassi, P. et al. Dynamics of Clostridium genus and hard-cheese spoiling Clostridium species in anaerobic digesters treating agricultural biomass. AMB Expr 10, 102 (2020).

Download citation


  • Anaerobic digestion
  • Pathogen
  • Clostridium
  • Agricultural biomass
  • Mesophilic
  • CSTR