Skip to main content

Advertisement

AMB Express
AMB Express Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Gut microbiota of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in integrated crayfish-rice cultivation model

AMB Express volume 10, Article number: 5 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Increasing evidences suggest that intestinal microbiota balance closely correlated with host’s health status could affected by external environment. Integrated crayfish-rice cultivation model is a highly efficient artificial ecosystem widely practiced in subtropical China. Less information is available to estimate the influence response to the micro-ecology of crayfish intestine and so as to influence the biological processes. Thus, 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing approach was employed to investigate the composition diversity and functions of bacterial community in the intestines of Procambarus clarkii farmed within this model. Results exhibited the highly diversity of microflora with dominant phyla Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The genera of Candidatus Bacilloplasma and Ornithinibacter were presented as predominant population much exceeds in richness comparing to that of other genus. Despite the highly diversity in the bacterial community, the predicted functions indicated relative consistent in biological processing pathway. Collectively, significant richness of genes was observed involved in amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism and membrane transport processing. This study would contribute to the understanding of the impact of growth conditions on host–microbiota relation especially in aquatic animals.

Introduction

The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii is a highly adaptable and fecund freshwater crayfish species becoming an important aquatic food sector among fishery trading commodities in China (Du et al. 2017; Shen et al. 2014). The production exceeded 1 million tons with 37 billion USD output in 2017, accounting for 80% of global production according to FAO statistics (FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/) and Crayfish Industry Report 2018 (http://www.moa.gov.cn/). This is in contrast to the reality that it considered as an invasive species in Europe and Asia (Carreira et al. 2017). The vigorous development of the industry was substantially attributed to the improved optimization of efforts involved in crayfish-rice farming, which original model has been practiced in Louisiana, USA for several decades (Si et al. 2017a; Anastacio et al. 1999).

In this integrated crayfish-rice cultivation (CR) model, wastes (e.g. weeds, insects, leafs, and plankton) utilized as food sources be eaten by crayfish. While crayfish dig burrows increasing soil permeability and material/energy circulation and its feces used as high-quality fertilizer and thereby, advance the rice growth. Literatures have demonstrated that CR model significantly affects chemical and biological processes of belowground and increase soil microbial biomass comparing to the monoculture (Si et al. 2017b; Cai et al. 2019). In 2018, CR model has been practiced to an area of approximately 200,000 hm2 mostly in subtropical China, showing the significant economic and social benefits (Cao et al. 2017). Modeling of CR ecosystem has been a widely explored topic, and many papers have been presented (Si et al. 2017a; Barbee et al. 2010; Li et al. 2018a). In general, these efforts have primarily focus on the establishment to the effect of environment utilization and energy/materials benefits.

Increasing evidences pointed to a strong association between colonized microorganisms and biological processes (e.g. metabolism, immunity response, et al.) of host especially in aquatic species (Gómez and Balcázar 2008; Roeselers et al. 2011). In Litopenaeus vannamei, significant difference in the microbial composition and function was observed after WSSV infection, suggesting the intestinal microbiota function in immune response (Wang et al. 2019). Studies in Rainbow trout indicated that insect meal positively modifies gut microbiota, increasing its richness and diversity and in particular, increasing the amount of beneficial lactic acid and butyrate producing bacteria (Terova et al. 2019). Moreover, Li et al. (2018b) pointed out that the gut microbiota of Asian carp depends on exact species, even when cohabiting in the same environment. These findings suggesting the importance but complexity functions of gut microbiota in the aquatic animals affected by various external interferences. CR model is indeed a highly efficient artificial ecosystem organic combining agriculture and aquaculture together. From the microbial point of view, investigating the diversity and functions of microbiota in vivo of the crayfish habiting in such environment, would contribute to the understanding of the impact of ecology on crustaceans and perhaps, to improve culture strategies. To date, less information is available however.

Accordingly, in the present study, we employ the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and assembly analysis targeting the V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to investigate the composition, diversity and function dynamics of P. clarkii gut microbiota involved in the growth condition caused by the CR model, as well as providing a theoretical basis for promoting the system. To our knowledge, this study is the first regarding to the gut bacterial community of crayfish farming within CR model via HTS.

Materials and methods

Study site and sample collection

This study was conducted on the up-to-10 years practiced CR model in waterlogged rice paddy fields in Huai’an City, Jiangsu Province, China. The region has a humid, subtropical monsoon climate with a 1500 mm average annual rainfall. A peripheral trench (3.0 × 1.5 m) was excavated and crayfish larvae (weighing 5 ± 2 g) were stocked at a density of 1.5 × 105 larvae·ha−1, and the crayfish self-propagated inside the rice paddies.

Healthy and robust crayfish weighing approximately 15–25 g were collected from this ecosystem. They were acclimatized at ambient temperature (22 ± 1 °C) in air-pumped circulated artificial freshwater before the treatment. Five individuals were randomly captured and the intestine was sampled respectively (mark with S1–S5). The intestine was separated and its contents were collected using sterilized equipment, in which there was no contact with soil or other pollution sources. All samples were stored at − 80 °C immediately before DNA extraction.

DNA isolation, PCR amplification, and Miseq sequencing

Total genomic DNA was isolated from intestine tract samples using the Qiagen QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit according to the instructions. The concentration of isolated DNA was measured by a Nano-Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, USA). PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed based on the literature (Liu et al. 2008) using PCR primers specific for the V3–V4 regions. All PCR products were visualized on agarose gels (2% in TAE buffer) containing ethidium bromide, and purified with a DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen, China). Prior to sequencing, the DNA concentration of each PCR product was measured by spectrophotometer and mixed with the appropriate proportion based on sequencing requirements. Amplicon libraries were constructed, and sequencing was performed using the Illumina Miseq platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

Sequence analysis

Sequences from raw data were analyzed and filtered by Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology as reported previously (QIIME, http://qiime.org/index.html). Sequencing error and chimeras were detected and removed; reads that could not be assembled were discarded. Sets of sequences with at least 97% identified were defined as an operational taxonomic unit (OTU) by Uparse (http://drive5.com/uparse/). The highest frequency sequences in OTUs act as the representative sequence. GreenGene Database (http://greengenes.lbl.gov/) was employed to align the sequences. The taxonomic information was annotated by RDP classifier (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rdp-classifier/) with 70% confidence threshold (Quast et al. 2013). Data of OTUs abundance was normalized by the standard sample with the least sequences. Subsequent analysis of alpha diversity and beta diversity were all performed basing on the normalized data.

Statistical methods

Rarefaction curves were plotted for each sample to determine the abundance of communities and sequencing data of each sample. Alpha-diversity analyses, including community richness parameters (Chao1, ACE, Rank-Abundance curves), community diversity parameters (Shannon, Simpson, Shannon–Wiener curves), and a sequencing depth index (Good’s coverage), were calculated using the Mothur software (Yang et al. 2014). Beta diversity measurements including Approximately Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic trees mapped using FastTree (http://www.microbesonline.org/fasttree/) as well as principal coordinate analyses (PCoA) based on OTU compositions were calculated. Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) tree was contrasted via QIIME. A Venn diagram conducted by Draw Venn Diagram online (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) was implemented to show unique and shared OTUs. Differences between populations were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

OTU tables were generated by closed-reference picking protocol to predict the metagenomes using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). After normalized by the 16S rRNA copy numbers, functional pathways were predicted by Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) of proteins annotation as well as Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) catalogue at level 1, 2 and 3 KEGG orthology groups (KOs).

Accession number

Raw data of all samples in this study has been deposited in Sequence Read Archive database of NCBI under the SRA Accession: PRJNA557576.

Results

Sequencing depth and alpha diversities

Totally, we obtained 279,880 high-quality sequences from the intestine content of 5 crayfish samples within CR model. The sequencing reads range from 52,552 to 60,178, with an average of 55,976 reads per sample. For the further downstream analyses, sequencing reads was normalized to minimum (43,880 reads) by randomly subsampling to standardize sampling effort. These normalized sequences with average length of 418 bp were assigned to 646 OTUs (163–470) with 97% sequence similarity (Table 1 and Additional file 1: File S1). Good’s coverage regarded as the indicator to estimate the completeness of sequencing was calculated among the samples, ranging from 99.75 to 99.80%. The rarefaction curve at an OTU definition of 97% identity and Rank-Abundance curves were shown in Additional file 2: Figures S1 and S2 respectively.

Table 1 Number of reads, statistical estimated community richness index (chao and ace), community diversity index (simpson and shannon), and Good’s coverage for 16S rRNA libraries of P. clarkii intestinal microbial ecosystems
Full size table

To investigate the difference of community richness and diversity, alpha diversity index including chao1 and ace (community richness indexes), Simpson and Shannon (diversity indexes) were also calculated. The indexes of diversity at a genetic distance of 3% are presented in Table 1. No significant difference in alpha diversity indices were observed among the samples (p > 0.05).

Taxonomic composition

A total of 19 taxa were identified at the phylum level in this study (Fig. 1a). Significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of gut microbiota among the samples (p < 0.05). Top five phyla in abundance were considered to be the core gut microbiota: Actinobacteria (range from 0.41–56.47% in each sample); Proteobacteria (11.21–41.07%); Tenericutes (0.94–56.13%); Firmicutes (1.40–28.30%); and Bacteroidetes (0.51–12.40%). In general, these core microbiotas accounted for roughly 80% of the total in the samples S3, S4 and S5; but 97% in other samples (S1 and S2). There was some variation in microbial composition in more detail. For instance, microbiota from sample S2 demonstrated a markedly lower abundance of Actinobacteria (0.41%) in its intestine than that of others (3.74, 30.83, 31.72, and 56.47% respectively); while microbiota from sample S4 showing a much lower abundance of Tenericutes (0.94%) than that of others (9.36, 12.22, 31.31, and 56.13% respectively).

Fig. 1
figure1

Community barplot analysis showing the relative abundance of gut bacterial community among the samples by Mothur at the phylum (a) level and genus (b) level. Less than 1% abundance of the phyla/genera was merged into “others”

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 1b, a large number of sequences were classified (98.30, 97.88, 88.92, 84.78, and 92.87% in samples S1–S5, respectively), and more relative differences were presented at the genus level. Altogether, detected OTUs were distributed among 267 bacterial genera. In the composition of sample S1, Candidatus Bacilloplasma was distinctly the predominant (56.12%), followed by Vibrio (20.31%) and Tyzzerella 3 (8.30%). Actually it was also the main component genus in sample S2 (31.31%); others are Shewanella (19.67%), Unclassified Weeksellaceae (11.38%), Citrobacter (9.40%), et al. The abundance of Tyzzerella 3 in sample S3 and S5 was both around 16.95%, but other samples (S1, S2 and S4) had hardly any of this genus. ZOR0006 was present in sample S5 with the abundance of 10.08%, while averagely lower than 0.5% in other samples. Interestingly, we found that Unclassified Weeksellaceae was common to sample S1 and S2 but not present in others.

Community structures

We explored the PCoA analysis to examine the community structures of the gut microflora among the samples at the OTU level (Fig. 2a). On the PCoA plot, each symbol represents one gut microbiota, and distance between symbols on the ordination plot reflects relative dissimilarities in community structures. The result demonstrated that microflora communities of sample S3, S4 and S5 clustered tightly and, were separated from those of sample S2 and S1 along principal coordinate axis 1 (PC1), which explained the largest amount of variation (71.26%). This result is also agreement with the taxonomic composition analysis, where samples S1 and S2 were found to possess a significantly lower number of OTUs than those of samples S3, S4 and S5.

Fig. 2
figure2

Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and the Venn diagrams. a PCoA of gut microbial communities on OTU level, each symbol represents one gut microbiota, and distance between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures; b the shared and unique OTUs were represented through Venn diagrams. Venn diagram at distance 0.03; 92 OTUs were shared among samples

Full size image

To further compare the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, the shared and unique OTUs were represented through a Venn diagrams (Fig. 2b). Pairwise comparison was performed among the samples by considering a similar level of 97% OTUs for analysis. As shown in the figure, across samples, they exhibited relatively similar with 92 OTUs overlapping.

In addition, a community Heatmap was plotted to estimate the similarities of the membership and structure among the samples at the genus level (Fig. 3). On this map, red indicates communities that are more similar than those colored in blue. The result reveals that the highest degree of similarity of the taxonomic composition was presented among samples S3, S4 and S5, which distinguishes from the rest two samples (composition of S1 and S2). Correspondingly, the additional Hierarchical clustering tree at the OTU level was presented showing the consistent result with the Heatmap result above (Additional file 2: Figure S3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Heatmap to estimate the similarities of the membership and structure of the samples at the genus level. The color code represented the similarly of the sample gut microbe communities, where blue (value =−1) represents the lowest and the red (value = 4.5) the highest level of abundance

Full size image

Evolutionary analysis

On the basis of sequence similarities, we employed the FastTree software to map the phylogenetic trees at the genus (Fig. 4) and phylum level (Additional file 2: Figure S4). The results were presented in the form of a combination of evolutionary trees as well as reading abundance. As detailed in these figures, the sequences were classified into several clusters corresponding to the major genus and phylum, the domain bacteria. Tenericutes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria represented the top reading abundance, which is consistent with the above taxonomic composition analysis (Fig. 1). The phylum Proteobacteria uniform distributed among samples showing a relatively distant genetic distance. Across the samples, Candidatus Bacilloplasma in phylum Tenericutes was presented as predominant population much more in richness comparing to that of other genus.

Fig. 4
figure4

Phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic relationship among the samples on genus bar. All bootstrap values > 50% was shown on the tree

Full size image

16S rRNA functional prediction analysis

To analyze the functions of gut microbiota among the samples, metagenomes potential were predicted by PICRUSt. Sequences were conducted and submitted to the KEGG database for analysis. Results revealed the high abundance of bacterial metagenomes in crayfish intestine (Additional file 3: File S2). Briefly, they were mainly associated with Metabolism pathway group, Genetic information processing group, Environmental information processing group and the so-called unclassified group in KEGG level 1 (Table 2). For the Metabolism group, the largest abundance was found in Amino Acid Metabolism, Carbohydrate metabolism, Energy Metabolism and Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins et al. in level 2. For the Genetic Information Processing group, abundance was found in Replication and Repair, Translation, as well as Transcription. Significantly abundance was observed in Membrane Transport pathway group belonging to the Environmental Information Processing group in KEGG level 1.

Table 2 Abundance of predicted functions in KEGG database
Full size table

Sequence similarity search was also conducted and all clusters were submitted to the search against the cluster of COG database for functional prediction and classification in this study. Among the 25 COG categories shown in Fig. 5 and Additional file 2: Figure S5, the relative abundance were observed in “function unknown” group (9.13, 9.96, 9.32, 9.06 and 8.84% in sample S1–S5 respectively), “general function prediction only” group (8.83, 7.72, 8.82, 8.92 and 8.90%), “amino acid transport and metabolism” group (8.81, 8.44, 9.05, 9.02 and 9.03%) and “Energy production and conversion” group (7.13, 6.73, 7.35, 7.28 and 7.20%), with the following “extracellular structures” and “nuclear structure” groups being the smallest abundance.

Fig. 5
figure5

Relative abundance of COG function classification for each samples were predicted by PICRUSt

Full size image

Discussion

As has been generally accepted, the bacterial diversity is closely associated with the functional stability of endogenous microbiota in aquatic fauna (Pan et al. 2019). Many factors (age, genotype, diets, and habitat, etc.) affect the community architecture; thereby the dominant bacteria are well recognized compete to maintain a well-balanced intestinal flora continually (Cresci and Bawden 2015). Additionally, understanding the principles governing microbial community assembly and its maintenance within the intestine had led to a reflection measuring the ecological significance of the ecosystem. Currently, cultivation of P. clarkii within CR model presents great potential both economically and ecologically. In this work, attention was paid to the composition diversity and the function of gut microbiota in P. clarkii within CR model. Using the 16S rRNA Illumina MiSeq sequencing approach, a total of 19 phylotypes as well as 267 genera were observed, showing the highly diversity and richness of intestinal microflora.

In general, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes constituted the predominant phyla in this work, which corroborated with the previous studies on crustacean species (Hoyoux et al. 2009; Abdelrhman et al. 2016; Egerton et al. 2018). These evidences have indicated that Actinobacteria is normally the most abundant phyla in P. clarkii intestine. Functionally, Actinobacteria was regard to participate in the decomposition of organic matter in soil and sediments, and studies in mammals have shown a positive correlation with fiber intake (Henning et al. 2017). While some carp species (Li et al. 2018b), birds (Sun et al. 2018) and mammals (Gu et al. 2013; Andersson et al. 2008) shared Bacteroidetes as the most common phylum (relative abundance > 10%), Firmicutes (mostly the genus of Tyzzerella 3 in this work) was found with relative abundance evenly distributed among the detected samples. Of relevance, literatures have indicated that the Firmicutes (Proteobacteria as well) might be urgent for some physiological and biochemical functions of the intestine of crustacean species (Zeng et al. 2016). Furthermore, the phylum Firmicutes which potential metabolizes dietary plant polysaccharide in the mammal gut was regarded as the most abundant phylum in the feces microflora of carnivorous animals (Becker et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2016). This could explain at least in part its existence in P. clarkii intestine samples in this work, as crayfish is a carnivorous freshwater species with extensive feeding patterns. In short, P. clarkii cultivation within CR model provided extra in rich source of food (e.g. weeds and insects) for the species in comparing with the monoculture feeding with commercial feed (Si et al. 2017a).

In terms of the genus, Candidatus Bacilloplasma was found as the dominant with significant high abundance in this work, followed by Ornithinibacter, Tyzzerella 3, Vibrio, Norank Saccharimonadales et al. These findings were partly consistent with the previous notable research on crayfish intestinal, which also listed the major genera (Candidatus Bacilloplasma, Bacteroides, Vibrio, Acinetobacter, Dysgonomonas, Tyzzerella 3, Aeromonas et al.) (Feng et al. 2019). Candidatus Bacilloplasma was considered to be the novel lineage of Mollicutes associated with the hindgut wall of the isopod (Crustacea: Isopoda) first identified in Porcellio scaber (Kostanjsek et al. 2007). Literatures also demonstrated that Candidatus Bacilloplasma OTUs were clustered into several subgroups in which the neighboring sequences were obtained from a variety of sea animals but mostly in crustacean [Litopenaeus vannamei (Rungrassamee et al. 2016), Eriocheir sinensis (Chen et al. 2015), Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (Wu et al. 2012) and Nephrops norvegicus (Meziti et al. 2010)]. These findings suggested that this population was highly diversified and played significant roles in the gut microbiota of crustaceans. Nevertheless, no isolated strain is available yet. Of note is the significant abundance of Ornithinibacter, which occupying to the dominant of phyla Actinobacteria. To the best of our knowledge, no evidence with such high abundance of this population was found in other studies. Given that all intestinal samples in this work were collected from healthy adult species, the potential role of Ornithinibacter in these samples was unclear but could be associated with the pathway of genetic information processing. Meanwhile, it is also unknown whether the high abundance of Candidatus Bacilloplasma and Ornithinibacter observed in this work is associated with the growth condition caused by CR model cultivations. The effect of these bacteria in P. clarkii intestine needs further investigation.

At the genus level we identified several extra pathogens in the healthy P. clarkii intestine, such as Vibrio, Aeromonas and Bacteroides. These pathogens recognized as the Gram- facultative/oblige anaerobic bacteria which were commonly existed in the variety of marine and freshwater species (Egerton et al. 2018; Di et al. 2014), suggesting the endogenous microbial as members of the established-flora associated with aquatic environment corresponding to the transient-flora. Actually, studies in L. vannamei have indicated that bacterial diseases due to Vibrio species in shrimps are often associated with grow out conditions (Wang et al. 2019). The dominant position of these pathogens in healthy P. clarkii intestine indicated that pathogenic bacteria may act as opportunistic agents in causing diseases. No member of Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast or Lactic acid bacteria was detected in P. clarkii intestinal samples in this work, suggesting that Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast indeed not to be a food source for crayfish although it is in most fish species (Dong et al. 2014).

In line with other studies on aquatic hosts such as Danio rerio (Burns et al. 2016), Scylla serrata (Augusto and Serrano 2012) and Eriocheir sinensis (Sui et al. 2015), results from UPGMA clustering, Heatmap and PCoA for the community structure consistently demonstrated that P. clarkii under identical conditions did not possess the same microflora in similar proportions and particular, in the most abundant phyla. These findings suggested a general phenomenon in adult animals. Given that the individuals were reared under the same conditions, the differences in gut microbiota might not be a simple reflection of microbes in the surrounding water, but instead result from the species-specific diet, gut morphology, trophic level and phylogeny, as shown in previous studies. Besides, taken into account the notable lower OTU numbers identified in samples S1 and S2 (Table 1), the possibility that these samples are in poor health status (although not visible in this study) is also considered. Nevertheless, these speculations also to some extent implied that the HTS approach from five random individuals employed in this work indeed underestimates the bacterial diversity.

Although the samples detected in this work showed the richness and diversity of gut microbiota, they are relative highly consistent in biological functions. Both KEGG and COG analysis revealed that the most abundant KOs related to membrane transport and metabolism, participate in the amino acid metabolism and transport process in P. clarkii. Generally, micro-organisms engaged in a significant part of the animal food chain participating in the material circulation and energy flow in the culture system; on the other hand, played an important role in maintaining ecological balance and optimizing environmental quality (Lee et al. 2014). Studies have indicated that virus infection could facilitate host membrane transport as their genomes and proteins need to be transported across plasma membrane during budding process (Wang et al. 2019). The significant high abundance of gene involved in membrane transport processing observed in this work reflected the role of gut microbial participate in material absorption and energy exchange activity in P. clarkii. Unfortunately, whether this positive participation was affected by the CR model farming was remaining unclear. Nevertheless, our ongoing research involved in the comparison analysis of P. clarkii gut microbiota among growth conditions will probably enhance our understanding.

Overall, here we have demonstrated that P. clarkii within CR model farming in some respects develop a gut microbiota similar to that of crayfish collected recently from their natural habitat, while significant high abundance of specific population (e.g. Candidatus Bacilloplasma and Ornithinibacter) were also observed. It is unequivocal that the molecular approach such as 16S HTS proved to be a powerful tool for identifying the microbial diversity of intestine in host–microbiota studies.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting our finding included in the manuscript.

References

  1. Abdelrhman KF, Bacci G, Mancusi C, Mengoni A, Serena F, Ugolini A (2016) A first insight into the gut microbiota of the sea turtle Caretta caretta. Front Microbiol 7:1060

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastacio PM, Frias AF, Marques JC (1999) CRISP (crayfish and rice integrated system of production): 1. modelling rice (Oryza sativa) growth and production. Ecol Model 123(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson AF, Lindberg M, Jakobsson H, Backhed F, Nyren P, Engstrand L (2008) Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 3:e2836

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Augusto E, Serrano J (2012) Changes in gut evacuation time of larval mud crab, Scylla serrata (Crustacea: portunidae) fed artificial plankton or live food. Aquacult Aquar Conserv Legis 5(4):240–248

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbee GC, Santer MM, McClain WR (2010) Lack of acute toxicity of an anthraquinone bird repellent to non-target crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) associated with rice-crayfish crop rotations. Crop Prot 29(5):506–508

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker AA, Hesta M, Hollants J, Janssens GP, Huys G (2014) Phylogenetic analysis of faecal microbiota from captive cheetahs reveals under representation of Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacteriaceae. BMC Microbiol 14(1):43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns AR, Stephens WZ, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls JF, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJ (2016) Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J 10:655–664

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai C, Li G, Zhu J, Peng L, Li J, Wu Q (2019) Effects of rice-crawfish rotation on sail physicochemical properties in Jianghan Plain. Acta Pedol Sin 56:220–229 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cao CG, Jiang Y, Wang JP, Yuan PL, Chen SW (2017) “Dual character” of rice-crayfish culture and strategy for its sustainable development. Chin Eco-Agri 25:1245–1253 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carreira BM, Segurado P, Laurila A, Rebelo R (2017) Can heat waves change the trophic role of the world’s most invasive crayfish? diet shifts in Procambarus clarkii. PLoS ONE 12:e0183108

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen X, Di P, Wang H, Li B, Pan Y, Yan S, Wang Y (2015) Bacterial community associated with the intestinal tract of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) farmed in Lake Tai China. PLoS ONE 10:e0123990

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cresci GA, Bawden E (2015) Gut microbiome: what we do and don’t know. Nutr Clin Pract 30(6):734–746

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Di PP, Chen XB, Sun GW, Xiao JZ, Pan YJ (2014) Constitution analysis of intestinal dominant bacteria community in cultured Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J Microbiol 34(1):58–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong YY, Chen C, Ren J, Liu ZM (2014) Immunomodulatory effects of lactic acid bacteria on gut-associated immune system: research progress. Chin J Microecol 26(2):208–221 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Du ZQ, Leng XY, Shen XL, Jin YH, Li XC (2017) Identification and characterization of lymph organ microRNAs in red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii infected with white spot syndrome virus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 69:78–84

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Egerton S, Culloty S, Whooley J, Stanton C, Ross RP (2018) The gut microbiota of marine fish. Front Microbiol 9:873

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng GZ, Zou YX, Wang YL, Wu YT, Shi Y (2019) Screening and identification of xylanase-producing strains isolated from crayfish intestine. Microbiol Chin 46:1364–1370 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gómez GD, Balcázar JL (2008) A review on the interactions between gut microbiota and innate immunity of fish. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 52:145–154

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu S, Chen D, Zhang JN, Lv X, Wang K, Duan LP, Nie Y, Wu XL (2013) Bacterial community mapping of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. PLoS ONE 8:e74957

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Henning SM, Yang J, Shao P, Lee RP, Huang J, Ly A, Hsu M, Lu QY, Thames G, Heber D, Li Z (2017) Health benefit of vegetable/fruit juice-based diet: role of microbiome. Sci Rep 7(1):2167

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoyoux C, Zbinden M, Samadi S, Gaill F, Compère P (2009) Wood-based diet and gut microflora of a galatheid crab associated with pacific deep-sea wood falls. Mar Biol 156(12):2421–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kostanjsek R, Strus J, Avgustin G (2007) “Candidatus Bacilloplasma” a novel lineage of Mollicutes associated with the hindgut wall of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: isopoda). Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5566–5573

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee WJ, Hase K (2014) Gut microbiota-generated metabolites in animal health and disease. Nat Chem Biol 10(6):416–424

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Q, Xu L, Xu L, Qian Y, Jiao Y, Bi Y, Zhang T, Zhang W, Liu Y (2018a) Influence of consecutive integrated rice-crayfish culture on phosphorus fertility of paddy soils. Land Degrad Dev 29:3413–3422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li X, Yu Y, Li C, Yan Q (2018b) Comparative study on the gut microbiotas of four economically important Asian carp species. Sci China Life Sci 61:696–705

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R (2008) Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16 s rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers. Nucleic Acids Res 36(18):e120

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meziti A, Ramette A, Mente E, Kormas KA (2010) Temporal shifts of the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) gut bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74(2):472–484

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan H, Li Z, Xie J, Liu D, Wang H, Yu D, Zhang Q, Hu Z, Shi C (2019) Berberine influences blood glucose via modulating the gut microbiome in grass carp. Front Mocrobiol 10:1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41(D1):590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roeselers G, Mittge EK, Stephens WZ, Parichy DM, Cavanaugh CM, Guillemin K, Rawis JF (2011) Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish. ISME J 5(10):1595–1608

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rungrassamee W, Klanchui A, Maibunkaew S, Karoonuthaisiri N (2016) Bacterial dynamics in intestines of the black tiger shrimp and the Pacific white shrimp during Vibrio harveyi exposure. J Invertebr Pathol 133:12–19

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen H, Hu Y, Ma Y, Zhou X, Xu Z, Shui Y, Xu P, Sun X (2014) In-Depth transcriptome analysis of the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. PLoS ONE 9:e110548

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Si G, Peng C, Yuan J, Xu X, Zhao S, Xu D, Wu J (2017a) Changes in soil microbial community composition and organic carbon fractions in an integrated rice–crayfish farming system in subtropical China. Sci Rep 7(1):2856

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Si G, Peng C, Xu X, Xu D, Yuan J, Li J (2017b) Effect of integrated rice-crayfish farming system on soil physicochemical properties in waterlogged paddy soils. Chin Eco-Agri 25:61–68 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sui L, Ma G, Lu W, Deng Y, Bossier P, Schryver PD (2015) Effect of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate on growth, enzyme activity and intestinal microbial community of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis (Milne-Edwards) juveniles. Aquacult Res 47(11):3644–3652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun CH, Liu HY, Zhang Y, Lu CH (2018) Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of hornbill and toucan in captivity. MicrobiologyOpen 8(7):e00786

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Terova G, Rimoldi S, Ascione C, Gini E, Ceccotti C, Gasco L (2019) Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gut microbiota is modulated by insect meal from hermetia illucens prepupae in the diet. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 29:465–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang J, Huang Y, Xu K, Zhang X, Sun H, Fan L, Yan M (2019) White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection impacts intestinal microbiota composition and function in Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol 84:130–137

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu S, Tian J, Wang G, Li W, Zou H (2012) Characterization of bacterial community in the stomach of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(5):2165–2174

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu X, Zhang H, Chen J, Shang S, Wei Q, Yan J, Tu X (2016) Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes high-throughput illumina sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(8):3577–3586

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang S, Liebner S, Alawi M, Ebenhoh O, Wagner D (2014) Taxonomic database and cut-off value for processing mcrA gene 454 pyrosequencing data by MOTHUR. J Microbiol Methods 103:3–5

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng TL, Ye YF, Mu CK, Wang K, Li RH, Wang CL (2016) Gut microbiota and metabolic phenotype of Portunus Trituberculatus. Chin J Anal Chem 44(12):1867–1873

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) for online analysis of I-Sanger Cloud Platform (https://www.i-sanger.com). The authors thank Prof. Huai-Shun Shen for his valuable review and comments on the draft of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by Jiangsu provincial Agricultural Breeding Project (PZCZ201746), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 2018HY-ZD0402), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472003).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 9# Shanshui East Road, Wuxi, 214081, Jiangsu, China
    • Yan Shui
    • , Guo-Feng Liu
    •  & Li-Min Fan
  2. The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, Jiangsu, China
    • Zheng-Bing Guan
  3. Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    • Guo-Feng Liu
Authors
  1. Yan Shui
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Zheng-Bing Guan
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Guo-Feng Liu
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Li-Min Fan
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

YS, ZG, GL and LF have collaborated on research design. YS and ZG have collaborated on technical analysis and manuscript preparation. GL and LF have collaborated on the manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Shui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences.

Consent for publication

All authors agree for publishing this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: File S1. Summary of OTU numbers and classification at the different levels (phylum, class, order, family and genus).

Additional file 2: Figure S1. Rarefaction analysis of V3-V4 Illumina MiSeq sequencing reads of the 16S rRNA gene in different gut ecosystems among the samples. Rarefaction curves at a cutoff level of 3% were constructed at a 97% sequence similarity cutoff value in Mothur. Figure S2. Rank-Abundance curves based on OTU level among the samples; Figure S3. Hierarchical clustering tree at the OTU level shows the relationship of the gut microbiota of the crayfish farming in CR model. Gut microbiota trees were generated using the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) algorithm based on the Bray-Curtis distances generated by Mothur; Figure S4. Phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic relationship among the samples in this study on Phylum bar. All bootstrap values > 50% was shown on the tree; Figure S5. Cluster of orthologous groups (COG) classification of putative proteins.

Additional file 3: File S2. Raw abundance data of the predicted functions. KOs in KEGG level 1 and level 2, as well as level 3 are listed.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shui, Y., Guan, Z., Liu, G. et al. Gut microbiota of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in integrated crayfish-rice cultivation model. AMB Expr 10, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0944-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Integrated crayfish-rice cultivation model
  • Gut microbiota
  • Procambarus clarkii
  • Illumina MiSeq sequencing