Skip to main content

Advertisement

AMB Express
AMB Express Cover Image
  • Original article
  • Open Access

Coupled changes of bacterial community and function in the gut of mud crab (Scylla Paramamosain) in response to Baimang disease

AMB Express20199:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0745-1

©  The Author(s) 2019

  • Received: 20 December 2018
  • Accepted: 29 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Increasing evidence has revealed a close association between intestinal bacterial community and hosts health. However, it is unclear whether and what extend Baimang disease alters the intestinal microbiota in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain). Here, we conducted intestinal contents Illumina sequencing of healthy and Baimang diseased mud crab (S. paramamosain) to understand bacterial community variations among health status. In addition, bacterial functional predication was used to investigate whether and how the bacteria variations further change their functions? The phyla of Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Tenericutes, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Spirochaetae constituted over 96.44% of the total intestinal bacteria, with being the dominant taxa. The 7 most significantly different orders, including the increased four orders of Clostridiales, Entomoplasmatales, Bacteroidales, and Mycoplasmatales and the decreased three orders of Vibrionales, Campylobacterales, and Fusobacteriales, accounted for 61.14% dissimilarity, probably being the indicator taxa of Baimang disease. Accordingly, 12 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes orthologies in level 3 shifted significantly at the diseased crabs. Especially, bacterial secretion system, secretion system, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins and Vibrio cholerae pathogenic cycle, being related to bacterial virulence, were reduced. In addition, the reduced butanoate metabolism, and induced methane metabolism and one carbon pool by folate were important metabolic processes of probiotic, such as Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp., with playing critical roles in host health. This study suggests that Baimang disease coupled altered the intestinal bacterial communities and functions, providing timely information for further analysis the influencing mechanism of Baimang disease in mud crab (S. paramamosain).

Keywords

  • Scylla paramamosain
  • Baimang disease
  • Intestinal bacterial community
  • Bacterial function

Introduction

Gut, the most important digestive organ, is colonized by complex symbiont microbiota with multiple functions critical for host health (Ramírez and Romero 2017; Xiong et al. 2018). Numerous studies have shown that gut microbiota affects the nutrient absorption, immune response and disease resistance of the hosts by secreting exogenous enzymes, fixing nitrogen source and producing secondary metabolites, etc., thus profoundly influence the physiology and pathology of hosts (Harris 1993; Bäckhed et al. 2004). For example, Gobet et al. (2018) found that digestive gland bacteria may cooperate to degrade algal polysaccharides to products which are assimilable by the host. The outbreak of diseases probably shapes the composition of intestinal microbial communities (Xiong et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2016). Shi et al. (2019) found that vibriosis induced marked changes in the gut bacterial composition of crab Portunus trituberculatus with driving the gut bacterial community into a kind of diseased status. In addition, the disruption of a normal microbiota would alter bacterial functional composition in the intestine accordingly (Zhu et al. 2016; Zeng et al. 2017; Shi et al. 2019). With the function predication by PICRUSt, Zhu et al. (2016) found that the pathways of focal adhesion and disease infection significantly increased in the diseased shrimp, while the antibacterial pathways decreased accompanied with the variety of intestinal microbial composition. These studies suggest that it is important to evaluate the health status of aquaculture organisms by the changes of intestinal microflora. Furthermore, bacterial functional analysis links the structure and function of intestinal microbial community thus helpful to clarify the pathogenesis.

Mud crab (Scylla paramamosain), a commercially important crustacean, is rapidly developed worldwide and widely cultured along the southeast coast of China with salinity around 10 g/L (Meng et al. 2017). Recently, as the rapid expansion of high density and intensive farming, it has suffered from serious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, parasites, and environmental changes with endangering the sustainable development of mud crab (S. paramamosain) industry (Zhu et al. 2018). Baimang disease, a physiological dysfunction in mud crab (S. paramamosain), is probably caused by dramatic decreased salinity in aquaculture water, thus plaguing the farmers in southeast China with frequent typhoons and rainstorms (Zheng 2014; Xu et al. 2000). The name of ‘Baimang disease’ comes from the typical symptom of the diseased crab: the muscles inside the pereiopod become milky white and even flow out white mucus while the healthy crab shows blue. The other symptom of Baimang diseased crab showed a frail situation of sluggish action and reducing ingestion (Zheng 2014; Xu et al. 2000). Recent years, studies have focused on the intestinal microbiota in healthy crabs or intestinal bacterial community assembly driving by growth conditions (Li et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2015a), however, little information is available regarding the effect of Baimang disease on the intestinal bacterial community structure and function assembly in mud crab (S. paramamosain), thereby shortening our knowledge of underlying the influencing mechanisms of Baimang disease.

Here, we collect the gut contents of healthy and Baimang diseased mud crab (S. paramamosain) from 3 crab ponds in Nansha district, Guangzhou, China. Illumina sequencing was conducted to identify the intestinal microbial diversity and to study the bacterial assembly caused by Baimang disease. In addition, bacterial function was predicated with the 16s rDNA gene data by PICRUSt to investigate whether and how the bacterial assembly further change its function? The results will help to reveal the effect of intestinal bacteria on health status of mud crab (S. paramamosain), and provide scientific basis for elucidating the influencing mechanism of Baimang disease in mud crab (S. paramamosain).

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Samples were collected from 3 mud crab (S. paramamosain) ponds in Nansha district, Guangzhou, China on November 22th 2017, when Baimang disease broke out with a mortality rate of about 50%. The diseased crabs’ muscles inside the pereiopod became milky white and even flow out white mucus, while the healthy crabs showed blue. Finally, five healthy crabs (H1 to H5) and five diseased crabs (D1 to D5) were collected with an average weight of 291 ± 25 g. The temperature, pH, DO, and salinity values of crab ponds water were 17.37 ± 0.22 °C, 8.43 ± 0.01, 6.66 ± 0.05 mg/L, and 3.92 ± 0.08 g/L (much lower than 10 g/L), respectively. The concentration of NO3−–N, NO2−–N, NH4+–N, PO43−P, TDN (total dissolved nitrogen), TDP (total dissolved phosphorus), DOC (dissolved organic carbon) were 0.178 ± 0.040 mg/L, 0.003 mg/L, 0.261 ± 0.032 mg/L, 0.010 mg/L, 0.753 ± 0.141 mg/L, 0.025 ± 0.003 mg/L, and 4.792 ± 0.397 mg/L, respectively. After the measurement of weight, crabs were washed thoroughly using sterile water and disinfected with 75% ethanol for 3–5 min. Crabs were dissected immediately and the whole digestive tracts were removed. The gut contents were collected in sterile tubes and immediately stored at − 80 °C before DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing

The bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a HiPure Soil DNA Kit B (Magen, China) base on the manufacturer’s instructions. Next generation sequencing library preparations and Illumina MiSeq sequencing were conducted at GENEWIZ, Inc. (Suzhou, China). DNA samples were quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Then V3 and V4 hypervariable regions of prokaryotic 16S rDNA were amplified for generating amplicons and following taxonomy analysis using forward primers containing the sequence “CCTACGGRRBGCASCAGKVRVGAAT” and reverse primers containing the sequence “GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAATCC”. 1st round PCR products were used as templates for 2nd round amplicon enrichment PCR. Indexed adapters were added to the ends of the 16S rDNA amplicons and DNA libraries were validated by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and quantified by Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer. DNA libraries were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina MiSeq instrument according to manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed using a 2 × 300 paired-end (PE) configuration; image analysis and base calling were conducted by the MiSeq Control Software (MCS) embedded in the MiSeq instrument.

Sequence analysis

The QIIME (1.9.1) data analysis package was used for 16S rDNA gene data analysis (Caporaso et al. 2010). Raw sequences were joined and quality filtered with the default parameters in QIIME. Then the chimeric sequences were detected and removed using UCHIME algorithm. The effective sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the clustering program VSEARCH (1.9.6) (Rognes et al. 2016) against the Silva 119 database pre-clustered at 97% sequence identity. The Ribosomal Database Program (RDP) (Wang et al. 2007) classifier was used to assign taxonomic category to all OTUs at confidence threshold of 0.8. The RDP classifier uses the Silva 123 database (Quast et al. 2012) which has taxonomic categories predicted to the species level. Sequences were rarefied prior to the calculation of alpha and beta diversity statistics. Alpha diversity indexes were calculated in QIIME from rarefied samples using for richness the Ace and Chao1 index, for diversity the Shannon and Simpson indexes. The Bray–Curtis distance matrix was calculated with the OTU table using PRIMER 6 & PERMANOVA + (Clarke and Gorley, 2006).

Microbial function prediction based on 16S rDNA data

The metagenome functional capacity was inferred with the 16S rDNA sequence data using PICRUSt (version 1.1.0) (Langille et al. 2013). A closed-reference OTU picking was performed on paired-end merged 16S rDNA sequences. The sequences were blasted against the Greengenes database with generating the OTU table. The OTU abundance matrix was firstly normalized to its 16S rDNA copy number. Predicted functional pathways were annotated by using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa et al. 2011) at level 1, level 2 and level 3 KEGG orthology groups (KOs).

Statistical Analysis

The independent t test was conducted to determine the significant difference of alpha diversity indexes, the relative abundance of bacterial community (order level) (Additional file 1: Table S1) and microbial function (KEGG level 3) (Additional file 1: Table S2) (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). The Bray–Curtis distance matrix (Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4) was used for the bacterial community and function analysis by preliminary one-way permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA), principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER). For healthy and diseased crab groups, the PERMANOVA showed that pond was not a significant effect on bacterial microbiota (Healthy group: Pseudo-F = 1.1679, P-perm = 0.405; diseased group: Pseudo-F = 0.4518, P-perm = 0.999). Subsequently, a PERMANOVA analysis was ran to examine the effect of Baimang disease on microbial communities and functions with the data of OTU table (Additional file 1: Table S5) and KEGG level 3 table (Additional file 1: Table S2) (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Moreover, the PCoA analysis was conducted to investigate the intestinal microbial community differences between healthy and diseased crabs. A SIMPER analysis was used to identify the bacterial taxa driving the differences in diseased crabs. The above-mentioned statistical analyses were performed with PRIMER 6 & PERMANOVA + (Clarke and Gorley, 2006) and IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 software, respectively.

Accession number(s)

All the raw reads were deposited in the Sequencing Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI with accession numbers from SRR8357120 to SRR8357129, and Bioproject Number “PRJNA510862”.

Results

Bacterial community structure and composition

Quality and chimera filtration of the raw data produced totally 697,738 high quality sequencing reads from 10 samples, with an average of 69,774 reads, ranging from 40,931 to 152,799 (Table 1). By performing the alignment with the effective reads, OTU were pre-clustered at 97% sequence identity. Finally, 268 OTUs were obtained and between 39 and 133 OTUs per sample (mean = 81, n = 10) (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S5).
Table 1

Summary of sequence, OTU, and α-diversity

Samples

No. of reads

No. of OTUs

α-Diversity indices

Ace

Chao1

Shannon

Simpson

H1

88,275

133

160.685

164.5

3.635

0.86

H2

48,239

66

52.875

49

2.003

0.617

H3

65,059

66

154.772

148

3.239

0.789

H4

64,532

45

94.259

83.75

2.05

0.659

H5

62,431

121

109.001

107

3.156

0.811

D1

40,931

60

42.705

40.667

1.521

0.557

D2

50,220

88

74.62

73

3.426

0.862

D3

51,725

39

234.746

196.565

2.677

0.738

D4

88,275

62

160.685

164.5

3.635

0.86

D5

152,799

132

100.413

93.6

1.122

0.414

The OTUs have been classified into 15 phyla and sequences that could not be classified into any known groups were assigned as ‘unclassified’ (Additional file 1: Table S6). The dominant (relative abundance > 5% at least in one sample) phyla were Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Tenericutes, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Spirochaetae (Fig. 1). In total, these dominant phyla accounted for over 96.44% of the bacterial sequences. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum among the 5 healthy samples, while only in 2 (D1 and D3) diseased samples (Additional file 1: Table S6, Fig. 1). Additionally, only in D4 sample, the Spirochaetae constituted over 5% (10.36%) (Additional file 1: Table S6, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Relative abundance of the dominant (relative abundance > 5% at least in one sample) phyla within different samples

At order level, a total of 39 taxa were identified. The top 10 most abundant orders were Vibrionales, Mycoasmatales, Campylobacterales, Fusobacteriales, Clostridiales, SubsectionI, Erysipelotrichales, Entomoplasmatales, Chthoniobacterales, Bcteroidales, Alteromonadales, and Spirochaetales, respectively, which accounted for 98.24% and 99.08% of the total intestinal bacteria in healthy and diseased crabs, respectively. (Figure 2, Additional file 1: Fig. S1, and Table S1).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Microbial community composition of the top 10 most abundant orders averaged over each crab group. Values show means and 1 standard error of mean (mean ± SEM, n = 5)

Variation in bacterial community structure across health status

The α-diversity indices showed similar intestinal bacterial richness (Ace, Chao1) and diversity (Shannon, Simpson) between the healthy and diseased crabs (independent t test,F = 1.801, 1.221, 1.736, and 3.480; P = 0.839, 0.931, 0.587, and 0.557) (Table 1). PERMANOVA analysis indicated that the effect of Baimang disease on the intestinal bacterial communities was marginally significant (Pseudo-F = 1.8828, P-perm = 0.064) and the order communities of Vibrionales and Clostridiales was marginally significant (independent-samples t test, F = 1.918 and 2.116; P = 0.091 and 0.067). In addition, the Axis 2 (PCO2) of PCoA analysis separated the healthy group from the diseased group (Fig. 3). First two axes (PCO1 and PCO2) explained 32.6% and 25% of the composition variation, respectively (Fig. 3). SIMPER analysis showed that the 7 most significantly different orders accounted for 61.14% dissimilarity of the two groups (Table 2). The contribution of Clostridiales, Entomoplasmatales, and Vibrionales were all over 10% (Table 2). The abundance of Clostridiales, Entomoplasmatales, Bacteroidales, and Mycoplasmatales were increased in the diseased group, while the abundance of Vibrionales, Campylobacterales, and Fusobacteriales were decreased (Table 2).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

PCoA analysis for the dissimilarity (Bray–Curtis distance) intestinal bacterial community composition of mud crab (S. paramamosain) associated with Baimang disease

Table 2

Results of the order-level SIMPER analysis giving the dissimilarities (73.04%) of total bacterial communities between groups (the data was square root transformed)

Orders

Average abundance of group H

Average abundance of group D

Average Dissimilarity

Contribution (%)

Cumulative contribution (%)

Clostridiales

1.61

4.40

6.73

12.90

12.90

Entomoplasmatales

0.98

3.29

6.16

11.82

24.72

Vibrionales

5.42

3.05

5.36

10.29

35.01

Bacteroidales

0.18

2.50

4.71

9.03

44.04

Campylobacterales

1.98

0.78

3.27

6.27

50.31

Fusobacteriales

2.41

0.76

3.21

6.15

56.46

Mycoplasmatales

1.04

1.68

2.44

4.68

61.14

Group H is the healthy crab group, and group D is the Baimang diseased crab group

Function predication and the difference induced by Baimang disease

A total of 246 KEGG pathways were generated using the OTU table data of the gut microbiota based on PICRUSt (Additional file 1: Table S2). The top 10 most abundant KEGG level 3 categories showed that the intestinal microbiota was enriched with functions relating to transporters, ABC transporters, secretion system, two-component system, DNA repair and recombination proteins, purine metabolism, bacterial motility proteins, ribosome, pyrimidine metabolism, ribosome Biogenesis, amino acid related enzymes, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis (Fig. 4, Additional file 1: Fig. S2, and Table S2).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Microbial functions of the top 10 most abundant KEGG level 3 categories averaged over each crab group. Values show means and 1 standard error of mean (mean ± SEM, n = 5)

PERMANOVA analysis showed that the effect of Baimang disease on the microbial functions was significant (Pseudo-F = 3.0177, P-perm = 0.015). Moreover, independent-samples t test showed that there were totally 12 KOs (KEGG level3) shift significantly in the diseased crabs with the relative abundance of at least one group was over than 0.5%. Seven of them were significantly reduced with involving into bacterial secretion system, secretion system, chaperones and folding catalysts, membrane and intracellular structural molecules, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins, Vibrio cholerae pathogenic cycle, and butanoate metabolism (Fig. 5 and Additional file 1: Table S7). However, the KOs of transcription machinery, protein export, RNA degradation, methane metabolism, and one carbon pool by folate were significantly induced in the diseased intestinal microbiota (Fig. 5 and Additional file 1: Table S7).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Predicted functions of the intestinal microbiota that varies significantly at between the healthy and diseased crabs (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)

Discussion

The epidemic in mud crab farms named as ‘Baimang disease’, which breaks out mainly after rainstorms as the salinity of aquaculture water drop sharply, results in large economic losses in crab farming in southeast China. Numerous host diseases has been linked to the disruption of intestinal microbial communities (Xiong et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2016; Xiong et al. 2018); therefore, unraveling the bacterial community assembly could help to elucidate the pathogenesis and guide the establishment of new strategies against diseases (Matsuyama et al. 2017; Xiong et al. 2017). However, there is little information about how and to what extent the bacterial intestinal community is altered by the occurrence of disease especially by Baimang disease in mud crab (S. paramamosain) (Li et al. 2012) limiting our understanding of its pathogenesis and the options of its treatment. Here we used the 16S rDNA Illumina sequencing method to study the effects of Baimang disease on the bacterial community assembly in mud crab (S. paramamosain). Further, the bacterial function was predicated to investigate whether and how the bacteria assembly further alters its function?

The results indicated that Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Tenericutes, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were the dominant intestinal phyla among the healthy samples, consistent with the previous study (Li et al. 2012). There was no difference in alpha diversity between healthy and diseased groups. However, PCoA analysis indicated that Baimang disease alter the Beta diversity. These results suggested that Baimang disease changes the intestinal bacteria composition but not the bacteria richness or diversity.

SIMPER analysis showed that the 7 most significantly different orders accounted for 61.14% dissimilarity of the two groups, probably being the indicator taxa of Baimang disease. Among them, the abundance of Clostridiales, Entomoplasmatales, Bacteroidales, and Mycoplasmatales belonging to the phyla of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Tenericutes were increased in the diseased group, while the abundance of Vibrionales, Campylobacterales, and Fusobacteriales belonging to the phyla of Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria were decreased. Zhang et al. (2016) found that Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria were decreased in lower salinity group of Nile tilapia (fish reared in fresh water), and Firmicutes and Tenericutes were more abundant while Bacteroidales was less abundant in lower salinity group of Pacific white shrimp. Similarly, the dropped salinity resulting into Baimang disease of mud crabs may lead to the decrease of Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria and increase of Firmicutes and Tenericutes which probably involved into salinity stress and participate in the osmotic pressure regulation. For example, Harris (1993) reported that the Vibrio (belonging to Proteobacteria) attached to the hindgut wall may play a role in ion transport across the gut wall, and thus contribute to osmotic regulation. However, the opposite changing trend of Bacteroidales needs further study, especially the interaction study of host-bacteria. In addition, many species of Clostridiales were reported to sporulate, generating dormant and resistant spores that can survive in terrible environment, such as the absence of nutrients due to host diseases (Paredes-Sabja et al. 2011). Therefore, the occurrence of Baimang disease led to the imbalance of intestinal microorganisms, thus probably increase the relative abundance of Clostridiales which had strong environmental adaptability.

Function predication indicated that the KOs of bacterial secretion system, secretion system, chaperones and folding catalysts, membrane and intracellular structural molecules, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins, Vibrio cholerae pathogenic cycle, and butanoate metabolism were reduced, while the KOs of transcription machinery, protein export, RNA degradation, methane metabolism, and one carbon pool by folate were significantly induced in the diseased group. Among them, the reduced KOs of bacterial secretion system, secretion system, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins and Vibrio cholerae pathogenic cycle are related to bacterial virulence (Pier 2007; Green and Mecsas 2016). Accordingly, Vibrionales and Campylobacterales, several species of which, such as Vibrio spp., Arcobacter spp. and Campylobacter spp., were putative pathogens with threatening host health (Eppinger et al. 2004; Vandenberg et al. 2004; Wang 2011; Liu et al. 2018), were decreased in the diseased group. Folate, the coenzyme of one-carbon units transferase system, can be synthesized in probiotic bacteria, such as Bacteroides spp. (belonging to Bacteroidales), and assigned to be important for host health (Poh et al. 2018). Methane metabolism is always happened in anaerobic bacteria, including the species of Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp., and reported to affect the gastrointestinal neuromuscular function of hosts (Mathur et al. 2016). The increase of Clostridiales and Bacteroidales probably contribute to the induction of methane metabolism and one carbon pool by folate. Moreover, butanoate metabolism is an important metabolic process of probiotic Clostridium spp. (belonging to Clostridiales), playing a critical role in the prevention and treatment of intestinal diseases, such as enteritis and intestinal tumorigenesis (Chen et al. 2015b). The more abundant of Clostridiales while the reduction of butanoate metabolism should be further researched. Overall, dysbiosis of intestine in mud crab (S. paramamosain) leads to the disorder of their physiological functions.

In cloclusion, both the intestinal microbiota and bacterial functions altered significantly due to Baimang disease. The results are helpful to reveal the response mechanism of intestinal microflora to the Baimang disease in mud crab (S. paramamosain) with providing guidance for evaluate host health status and laying scientific basis for elucidate the infulencing mechanism of Baimang disease. In the furture study, we recommend to isolate intestinal probiotics, such as Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp., and investgate their resistance mechinism to Baimang disease, thus develope defense measures against Baimang diseases.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YD conceived the study and wrote the manuscript; SL analyzed the data; CC and JX performed the experiments; YS and HM critically revised the manuscript; ZG and JF contributed the reagents. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for partial funding.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions are presented in this published article and the supplementary materials.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31052211), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-48), the Natural Science Fund of Guangdong (2018A030310695), Guangdong YangFan Innovative & Entepreneurial Research Team Program (2016YT03H038), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2017HY-ZD1007).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 309 of Building Keyan, 231 Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, China
(2)
Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

References

  1. Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI (2004) The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(44):15718–15723. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407076101 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 Epub 2010 Apr 11 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen X, Di P, Wang H, Li B, Pan Y, Yan S, Wang Y (2015a) Bacterial community associated with the intestinal tract of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) farmed in Lake Tai, China. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0123990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123990 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen ZF, Ai LY, Wang JL, Ren LL, Yu YN, Xu J, Chen HY, Yu J, Li M, Qin WX, Ma X, Shen N, Chen YX, Hong J, Fang JY (2015b) Probiotics Clostridium butyricum and Bacillus subtilis ameliorate intestinal tumorigenesis. Future Microbiol 10(9):1433–1445. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.15.66 Epub 2015 Sep 7 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, p 93Google Scholar
  6. Eppinger M, Baar C, Raddatz G, Huson DH, Schuster SC (2004) Comparative analysis of four Campylobacterales. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(11):872–885. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1024 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gobet A, Mest L, Perennou M, Dittami SM, Caralp C, Coulombet C, Huchette S, Roussel S, Michel G, Leblanc C (2018) Seasonal and algal diet-driven patterns of the digestive microbiota of the European abalone Haliotis tuberculata, a generalist marine herbivore. Microbiome 6(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0430-7 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Green ER, Mecsas J (2016) Bacterial secretion systems-an overview. Microbiol spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0012-2015 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris JM (1993) The presence, nature, and role of gut microflora in aquatic invertebrates: a synthesis. Microb Ecol 25(3):195–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171889 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M (2011) KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 40(D1):D109–D114. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr988 Epub 2011 Nov 10 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31(9):814–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676 Epub 2013 Aug 25 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Li K, Guan W, Wei G, Liu B, Xu J, Zhao L, Zhang Y (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of intestinal bacteria in the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J Appl Microbiol 103(3):675–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03295.x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Li S, Sun L, Wu H, Hu Z, Liu W, Li Y, Wen X (2012) The intestinal microbial diversity in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) as determined by PCR-DGGE and clone library analysis. J Appl Microbiol 113(6):1341–1351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12008 Epub 2012 Oct 1 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu SL, Jiang ZJ, Deng YQ, Wu YC, Zhang JP, Zhao CY, Huang DL, Huang XP, Trevathan-Tackett SM (2018) Effects of nutrient loading on sediment bacterial and pathogen communities within seagrass meadows. Microbiologyopen. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.600 (Epub 2018 Mar 9) View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathur R, Mundi MS, Chua KS, Lorentz PA, Barlow GM, Lin E, Burch M, Youdim A, Pimentel M (2016) Intestinal methane production is associated with decreased weight loss following bariatric surgery. Obes Res Clin Pract 10(6):728–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2016.06.006 (Epub 2016 Jul 2) View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsuyama T, Yasuike M, Fujiwara A, Nakamura Y, Takano T, Takeuchi T, Satoh N, Adachi Y, Tsuchihashi Y, Aoki H, Odawara K, Iwanaga S, Kurita J, Kamaishi T, Nakayasu C (2017) A Spirochaete is suggested as the causative agent of Akoya oyster disease by metagenomic analysis. PLoS ONE 12(8):0182280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182280 (eCollection 2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Meng FT, Gao HN, Tang XM, Wang AM, Yao XN, Liu CS, Gu ZF (2017) Biochemical composition of pond-cultured vs. wild gravid female mud crab Scylla paramamosain in Hainan, China: Evaluating the nutritional value of cultured mud crab. J Shellfish Res 36(2):445–452. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.036.0216 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR (2011) Germination of spores of Bacillales and Clostridiales species: mechanisms and proteins involved. Trends Microbiol 19(2):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.10.004 (Epub 2010 Nov 27) View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pier GB (2007) Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide: a major virulence factor, initiator of inflammation and target for effective immunity. Int J Med Microbiol 297(5):277–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.03.012 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Poh S, Chelvam V, Ayala-López W, Putt KS, Low PS (2018) Selective liposome targeting of folate receptor positive immune cells in inflammatory diseases.”. Nanomedicine 14(3):1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2018.01.009 (Epub 2018 Feb 1) View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2012) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41(D1):D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramírez C, Romero J (2017) Fine flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) microbiome showed important differences between wild and reared specimens. Front Microbiol 8(207):271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00271 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Shi C, Xia MJ, Li RH, Mu CK, Zhang LM, Liu L, Wang CL (2019) Vibrio alginolyticus infection induces coupled changes of bacterial community and metabolic phenotype in the gut of swimming crab. Aquaculture 499:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.031 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Vandenberg O, Dediste A, Houf K, Ibekwem S, Souayah H, Cadranel S, Douat N, Zissis G, Butzler JP, Vandamme P (2004) Arcobacter species in humans. Emerg Infec Dis 10(10):1863. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1010.040241 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang W (2011) Bacterial diseases of crabs: a review. J Invertebr Pathol 106(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.018 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiong J, Wang K, Wu J, Qiuqian L, Yang K, Qian Y, Zhang D (2015) Changes in intestinal bacterial communities are closely associated with shrimp disease severity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(16):6911–6919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6632-z View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiong J, Zhu J, Dai W, Dong C, Qiu Q, Li C (2017) Integrating gut microbiota immaturity and disease-discriminatory taxa to diagnose the initiation and severity of shrimp disease. Environ Microbiol 19(4):1490–1501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13701 (Epub 2017 Mar 23) View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Xiong JB, Nie L, Chen J (2018) Current understanding on the roles of gut microbiota in fish disease and immunity. Zool Res 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.069 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu HS, Shu MA, Shao QJ, Wang WZ (2000) Common diseases in Scylla serrate (Forskal) and technique for prevention and treatment. Fisheries Sci 19(5):24–26. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2000.05.008 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeng S, Huang Z, Hou D, Liu J, Weng D (2017) He J (2017) Composition, diversity and function of intestinal microbiota in pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) at different culture stages. PeerJ 5:e3986. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3986 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang M, Sun YH, Liu YK, Qiao F, Chen L, Liu WT, Du ZY, Li EC (2016) Response of gut microbiota to salinity change in two euryhaline aquatic animals with reverse salinity preference. Aquaculture 454:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.014 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng TL (2014) A review of research progresses of diseases in mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Fisheries Sci 33(5):326–330. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2014.05.012 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu J, Dai W, Qiu Q, Dong C, Zhang J, Xiong J (2016) Contrasting ecological processes and functional compositions between intestinal bacterial community in healthy and diseased shrimp. Microb Ecol 72(4):975–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0831-8 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu F, Qian X, Wang Z (2018) Molecular characterization of minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM7) in Scylla paramamosain and its role in white spot syndrome virus and Vibrio alginolyticus infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 83:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.09.028 (Epub 2018 Sep 8) View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement