Open Access

Competitive growth experiments with a high-lipid Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant strain and its wild-type to predict industrial and ecological risks

  • David A. Russo1Email author,
  • Andrew P. Beckerman2 and
  • Jagroop Pandhal3
AMB Express20177:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0305-x

Received: 4 November 2016

Accepted: 11 December 2016

Published: 3 January 2017

Abstract

Key microalgal species are currently being exploited as biomanufacturing platforms using mass cultivation systems. The opportunities to enhance productivity levels or produce non-native compounds are increasing as genetic manipulation and metabolic engineering tools are rapidly advancing. Regardless of the end product, there are both environmental and industrial risks associated to open pond cultivation of mutant microalgal strains. A mutant escape could be detrimental to local biodiversity and increase the risk of algal blooms. Similarly, if the cultivation pond is invaded by a wild-type (WT) microalgae or the mutant reverts to WT phenotypes, productivity could be impacted. To investigate these potential risks, a response surface methodology was applied to determine the competitive outcome of two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains, a WT (CC-124) and a high-lipid accumulating mutant (CC-4333), grown in mixotrophic conditions, with differing levels of nitrogen and initial WT to mutant ratios. Results of the growth experiments show that mutant cells have double the exponential growth rate of the WT in monoculture. However, due to a slower transition from lag phase to exponential phase, mutant cells are outcompeted by the WT in every co-culture treatment. This suggests that, under the conditions tested, outdoor cultivation of the C. reinhardtii cell wall-deficient mutant strains does not carry a significant environmental risk to its WT in an escape scenario. Furthermore, lipid results show the mutant strain accumulates over 200% more TAGs per cell, at 50 mg L−1 NH4Cl, compared to the WT, therefore, the fragility of the mutant strain could impact on overall industrial productivity.

Keywords

Competition Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Environmental risk Lipids Microalgae Response surface methodology

Introduction

Research into microalgal biotechnology has progressed considerably in the last few decades, with successful commercial examples of large-scale production in outdoor raceway ponds (Borowitzka and Moheimani 2013). Attempts are being made to increase productivity through process optimisation and, increasingly, through strain manipulation, which also enables a diversification in the portfolio of compounds that can be produced. One way to improve productivity of microalgal strains for biotechnology is through random mutagenesis, followed by screening for desired characteristics (Guarnieri and Pienkos 2015; Work et al. 2010). Although mutagenesis and screening can be time consuming and costly, it can improve metabolite production several fold. One species where this has been successfully demonstrated is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Li et al. 2010).

C. reinhardtii is a popular model organism with a fully sequenced and well-annotated genome (Merchant et al. 2007). Moreover, there are also powerful molecular tools available to modify and characterise its genome (Jinkerson and Jonikas 2015). It is, therefore, commonly used in laboratory scale microalgal biotechnology research and development. Like other microalgal species, C. reinhardtii responds to stress such as nitrogen deprivation (Siaut et al. 2011) with an accumulation of reserve molecules (e.g. lipid, starch). Recently, studies have found that inhibiting starch synthesis in C. reinhardtii, via mutagenesis, can divert the carbon flow towards an increase in intracellular triglycerides (TAGs) (Li et al. 2010; Work et al. 2010). These mutants can accumulate up to 3.5 times more TAGs than the wild-type (WT) strain under nutrient stress conditions (Li et al. 2010). These are promising advances, particularly in the field of microalgal biodiesel research, where process economics remain unfavourable and hence productivity increases through technological advances are keenly sought. However, to scale up production of TAGs through laboratory generated microalgal strains, such as the C. reinhardtii low-starch mutant, there are many challenges that need to be overcome, including appropriate strain cultivation strategies, efficient implementation of nutrient deprivation stress as well as low cost harvesting.

Here two risks associated with large-scale cultivation of microalgal mutant strains are assessed by undertaking a series of competitive growth and productivity experiments. The first is defined as an environmental risk, with the release of genetically altered organisms, which could impact on the biodiversity of the surrounding environment by outcompeting native strains (Snow and Smith 2012). This could further influence the community structure of aquatic ecosystems if the strain generates direct or indirect effects on microbes, grazers or higher trophic levels (invertebrate and vertebrate), ultimately influencing the probability of algae blooms or altered microbial community function (Flynn et al. 2013). Currently, there are no recommended laboratory protocols that can be used to infer or guide the level of risk associated with the escape of specific mutant algal strains into the environment. However, there are environmental risk assessments being generated which can be used for guidance, for example, decision trees asking questions such as: Does the mutant strain survive outside the bioreactor/raceway pond? Does it compete or interact with the WT? (Jeremy Sweet, personal communication).

In addition to the environmental risk, there is also an industrial risk, where the benefit of reduced starch synthesis (Li et al. 2010; Zabawinski et al. 2001) is lost during the cultivation process, and hence the enhanced TAG accumulation during nutrient stress is not realised. This could occur through natural mutation in the genes altered by random mutagenesis, or in the case of a deletion mutation, mating with an invasive WT strain. This could lead to a strain with TAG productivity characteristics similar to the WT dominating the outdoor raceway pond, hence, reducing overall TAG productivity. Moreover, raceway contamination through invasion by a local microalgal species, with lower TAG accumulation levels, is also an industrial risk.

Such risks would benefit from a strategic investigation of competitive dynamics where the fitness of modified or mutant strains are determined against their WT as a baseline. Although conducted in the laboratory, at small scale and in less complex conditions relative to the environment, it can provide key clues to estimate potential risks. If the fitness of the transgenic strain is relatively lower than that of the WT, then it can be argued that any environmental risk analysis could be based solely on the risks of cultivating the WT (Gressel et al. 2013). In this scenario, the industrial risk of reduced productivity, due to WT overtaking the transgenic strain, would need to be estimated.

To further this objective, the competitive outcome between cultivating two C. reinhardtii strains, the CC-124 strain (hereon referred to as WT strain) and the starchless CC-4333 strain (Zabawinski et al. 2001), (hereon referred to as mutant strain) was explored. An initial monoculture assessment of growth was undertaken followed by competing the strains against each other. A response surface competition experiment was developed, varying both the initial proportion of the WT and mutant strains, together with the nitrogen (ammonium chloride, NH4Cl) concentration in the media. An assessment of both environmental risk during an “escape scenario” and the industrial risk associated with being potentially out competed by the WT strain was made using this design. Subsequently, the industrial risk was further analysed by assessing total biomass accumulation and TAG productivity, again in response to varying the initial proportion of the strains and NH4Cl concentration.

Methods

Strains and culturing conditions

CC-124 is a WT C. reinhardtii strain with a cell wall and flagella, widely used in laboratory studies (Pröschold et al. 2005) and CC-4333 is a low starch, no flagellum, cell wall-deficient mutant, obtained through insertional mutagenesis, which lacks the catalytic (small) subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (Ball et al. 1991). Both strains were obtained from the Chlamydomonas Resource Center (University of Minnesota, USA). The cultures were maintained in mixotrophic conditions on tris-acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium as described by Gorman and Levine (1965). Cells were grown in 50 mL centrifuge tubes, with 25 mL of culture, and under 70 μmol m−2 s−1 constant illumination on an orbital shaker at 110 rpm. Constant illumination and mixotrophic growth conditions could, potentially, limit any comparison with natural environments and industrial cultivation under natural light. However, the vast majority of lipid studies having been undertaken in these conditions (e.g. Work et al. 2010; Ramanan et al. 2013), therefore, they were chosen in order to serve as a point of comparison.

Competition experiment

The response surface design is an experimental design where two variables are varied simultaneously, and estimates made of response variables at several combinations. A standard analysis for such data is to fit a response surface model (RSM), the basic fitting a second order polynomial for each variable, and an interaction term between them. This is a flexible model that can estimate planes, ridges, valleys and peaks as a function of linear polynomial functions of each variable, and their interaction. It specifically allows us to evaluate whether there are additive or interactive (synergistic/antagonistic) effects of competition and nutrient enrichment on, for example, TAG production or long term dynamics (e.g. competitive outcomes).

In our RSM design, cultures were grown to late log phase, harvested by centrifugation and resuspended at 1 × 105 cells mL−1, in parallel, in TAP medium with four different concentrations of NH4Cl: 50, 100, 200 and 375 mg L−1 and five different initial WT:mutant cell number ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 75:25 and 0:100). 200 μL aliquots were taken immediately after inoculation (0 h), and every 24 h after that, for cell counts and TAG quantification. A total of 1.2 mL was removed, from each tube, over the course of the experiment. Cell counts were performed using a Bright-Line glass haemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, USA)) on a BX 51 microscope (Olympus, Japan). The carrying capacities (K) and exponential growth rates (μ) were estimated by fitting a logistic growth curve to each respective cell count time series in GraphPad Prism 6.07 (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA). The WT and mutant strains are visually undistinguishable. Therefore, to separately count each strain the total number of cells were counted, samples were then incubated, for 5 min in 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma, USA), to completely lyse the cell wall deficient mutant cells. Preliminary tests with all initial WT:mutant cell number ratios showed a correlation of 0.98 between theoretical and observed cell lysis values (Additional file 1: Fig. A1). Afterwards, the total number of cells were recounted and the difference between both counts equalled the number of mutant cells present. Cells for TAG quantification were lysed by sonication on ice with a FB 15051 sonicator (Fischer Scientific, USA), at power level three and duty cycle 30%, for three cycles of 15 s. TAGs were then quantified with the commercially available Thermo Scientific Infinity TAG reagent kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendations.

From the time series of the three replicates of each NH4Cl and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio treatment combination K was estimated and used to fit and visualise the RSM. The RSM models and visualisations were fit in the R Statistical Programming Environment (R Development Core Team 2014) by employing the package “rsm” (Lenth 2009).

Results

WT and mutant C. reinhardtii strains grown in monoculture

Our initial focus was to characterise and compare the growth patterns of both strains in monoculture. When grown in monoculture in 375 mg L−1 NH4Cl, the WT strain has an μ of 1.76 ± 0.26 day−1, calculated between days 2 and 3, and achieves a K of 6.25 × 106 cells after 5 days (Fig. 1). The mutant strain has a higher, albeit not significantly, maximum cell number, K, of 6.68 × 106 cells under these conditions. However, the mutant cells, between days 2 and 3, had a significantly higher μ of 4.08 ± 0.52 day−1 (p = 0.008) (Fig. 1), indicating more than double the exponential growth rate of the WT strain. However, it was also observed that although the WT and mutant strains share similar growth patterns, there is a slower transition from lag phase to exponential phase with the mutant strain. This was confirmed by a significantly lower growth rate of mutant cells in the first 2 days of the experiment, 0.68 ± 0.04 day−1 (p = 0.008), when compared to the growth rate of the WT in the same timeframe, 1.24 ± 0.01 day−1.
Fig. 1

Growth curves, measured in cells mL−1, of WT (CC-124) and mutant (CC-4333) C. reinhardtii strains grown in nutrient replete conditions. Triangles indicate the mutant strain and circles indicate the WT strain

WT and mutant strain growth competition as a function of NH4Cl concentrations and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio

In every experimental treatment where the WT and mutant were mixed, the WT strain showed a significantly higher μ and K than the mutant strain (Fig. 2). This suggests that the overall fitness of the mutant strain is inferior to that of its WT, when cultivated in co-culture in the conditions tested (i.e. initial ratios, nitrogen concentrations, cultivation conditions etc.). In situations where both strains are sharing the same resource, the WT strain appears to maintain a higher fitness, which prevents the mutant strain from achieving cell numbers that can put the existence of the WT at risk.
Fig. 2

Time series of WT and mutant strain cell numbers as a function of NH4Cl concentrations (horizontal axis) and percentage of WT cells in initial culture (vertical axis). Triangles indicate the mutant strain and circles indicate the WT strain. Data have been transformed with a square root transformation

Biomass production as a function of NH4Cl concentrations and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio

A RSM was fit to data on the maximum biomass (K, estimated from each of the three replicate time series). K was estimated by fitting a logistic curve to each time series resulting in three estimates of K for each combination of NH4Cl concentration and initial WT:mutant cell number ratios. In order to investigate the relationship between the factors, a regression analysis was applied. The results are listed in Table 1 with the multiple correlation coefficient R 2 of 0.861 suggesting that the quadratic polynomial model was suitable for revealing these relationships. As shown in Table 1, K varied as a quadratic function of NH4Cl concentrations and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio (p < 0.001) and the effect of nutrient levels depended on initial WT:mutant cell number ratios (interaction; p < 0.001).
Table 1

Estimated regression coefficients for the RSM fit to data on the variation of K

Factor

Estimate

Std. Error

t-value

Pr(>|t|)

(Intercept)

−9.5967 × 105

9.6840 × 105

−0.9899

0.3267

NH4Cl

1.0607 × 105

9.4882 × 103

11.1789

<0.001

WT:mutant

−8.9544 × 106

2.4137 × 106

−3.7099

<0.001

NH4Cl * WT:mutant

−3.0166 × 104

5.0928 × 103

−5.9233

<0.001

NH4Cl2

−1.5301 × 102

2.0594 × 101

−7.4300

<0.001

WT:mutant2

1.0648 × 107

2.1386 × 106

4.9788

<0.001

R2: 0.861; R adj 2 : 0.8481. F5,54 = 66.88, p < 0.001

The data support a ridge like pattern of K (Fig. 3). Expectedly, K is highest with the mutant monoculture at higher nutrient levels, although there was no significant difference between the K at 200 mg L−1 NH4Cl and 375 mg L−1 NH4Cl. The ridge of maximum K then decreases with increasing percentage of initial WT.
Fig. 3

RSM analysis of carrying capacity (K) as a function of NH4Cl concentrations (vertical axis) and percentage of WT cells in initial culture (horizontal axis)

TAG production as a function of NH4Cl concentrations and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio

The highest TAG accumulation per million cells, during the stationary phase, occurs with the 100% mutant strain at the lowest nitrogen concentration (50 mg L−1 NH4Cl). In the mutant and WT co-cultures the results show that, from the perspective of TAGs per million cells, and due to the success of WT growth within the co-cultures, the lipid productivity could be reduced up to 60% (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Time series of TAG concentrations per million cells (μg TAG per 106 cells) for each combination of NH4Cl concentration and percentage of WT cells in initial culture. Circles, triangles, squares and vertical lines indicate 50, 100, 200 and 375 mg L−1 NH4 +, respectively

Discussion

The fact that the mutant cells, in exponential phase, had a significantly higher μ of 4.08 ± 0.52 day−1 (p = 0.008) (Fig. 1) would suggest that the mutant strain could outcompete the WT strain during an escape scenario presenting an environmental risk. It also hints that there would be a reduced industrial risk from the mutant strain being outcompeted by cells that have reverted to WT lipid accumulation characteristics. In a previous study that compared growth and lipid accumulation in a C. reinhardtii WT and the same mutant strain as this study (Work et al. 2010), the highest cell concentration and growth rate were achieved in the mutant strain, and this was attributed to its smaller cell diameter compared to the WT. This observation was confirmed in our study (Additional file 1: Fig. A2) and previously where it is has been demonstrated that cell size and growth rates are negatively correlated (Schlesinger et al. 1981). It was also observed that there is a slower transition from lag phase to exponential phase with the mutant strain compared to the WT. This difference could be detrimental to the survival of the mutant strain when grown in co-culture with the WT strain. It should be noted that this study was performed in a closed system with uniform resource conditions, without the presence of predators (e.g. zooplankton), symbiotic and antagonistic organisms and without fluctuating environmental conditions. Any of these factors that would favour the mutant or WT strain could create an unbalance and allow one to dominate the other.

In order to decipher which of the predicted scenarios from interpreting the monoculture results above were most likely to take place, co-culture experiments were undertaken where equal initial amounts of WT and mutant strain were competed (50:50), followed by a dominating mutant (25:75) and dominating WT (75:25) experiment. Pure cultures were cultivated as controls and the concentration of nitrogen was also varied (NH4Cl: 50, 100, 200 and 375 mg L−1). Recent reports have hypothesised that genetic mutations of biotechnological interest (e.g. leading to increased lipid content) are all in the opposite direction of evolution (i.e. optimal growth under natural conditions) and therefore should be outcompeted in growth by the respective WT strains (Flynn et al. 2010; Gressel et al. 2013). The results in this study support this theory. Our results showed that when the WT and mutant were mixed, the overall fitness of the mutant strain is inferior to that of its WT (Fig. 2). Work et al. (2010) suggest several reasons why this would happen: under nitrogen deprivation, starchless mutants metabolise less acetate and have severely attenuated levels of photosynthetic O2 evolution compared to the WT. This indicates that the mutant strain responds to nitrogen deprivation by decreasing its overall anabolic processes (Work et al. 2010). If the cells in the lag phase of a mixed culture are under similar stress, it could explain why the WT dominates over the mutant in every experimental scenario tested.

Although the competition results showed a clear difference between the WT and mutant, this study was done in a closed system with uniform resource conditions, without the presence of predators (e.g. zooplankton), symbiotic and antagonistic organisms and without fluctuating environmental conditions. Any of these factors that would favour the mutant strain could create an unbalance and allow it to dominate over its WT. For example, in a natural system, differences in grazer palatability can have a dramatic effect on the competitive outcome. Van Donk (1997) performed grazing experiments to determine the role of cell wall structure and nutrient limitation on the digestibility of the C. reinhardtii WT and cell wall-deficient mutant. The study revealed that under nutrient limiting conditions, Daphnia magna clearance rates of C. reinhardtii WT cells were severely debilitated. In contrast, under both non-limiting and limiting nutrient conditions, C. reinhardtii mutant cells were cleared equally (Van Donk 1997). This further supports our prediction that mutant cells remain unlikely to outcompete their WT strain and much less so under nutrient stress conditions necessary to take advantage of the mutation.

Industrially, both the data from this study and Van Donk (1997) suggests that outdoor large-scale cultivation of cell wall-deficient mutant strains has many associated economic risks of failure to produce effective quantities of product. A reversion from the mutant strain to its WT, contamination of the mutant strain culture by its WT or invasion by grazers would result in rapid reduction or disappearance of the mutant. Therefore, while industrial outdoor cultivation of cell wall-deficient mutant strains does not present a significant environmental risk to its WT in an escape scenario, the fragility of the mutant strain could impact on overall industrial productivity. The WT strain would most likely outcompete the mutant in competitive cultures sharing the same resources.

In order to further investigate the level of industrial risk, productivity from a total biomass and total TAG accumulation perspective was quantified during co-culture experiments, over a range of nitrogen concentrations. A RSM was fit to data on the maximum biomass (K, estimated from each of the three replicate time series) and TAG concentrations were calculated, per cell, during the stationary phase to assess biomass and TAG accumulation over time as a function of NH4Cl and initial WT:mutant cell number ratio. In accordance with the monoculture experiments (Fig. 1), the maximum K was observed when the mutant strain was grown alone at higher NH4Cl concentrations. There was no significant difference between the K at 200 and 375 mg L−1 NH4Cl, which corroborated the monoculture experiments. In agreement with the extensive literature on lipid accumulation in C. reinhardtii, our study shows that in stationary phase net growth halts and accumulation of TAGs begins (e.g. Siaut et al. 2011). TAGs accumulated in nitrogen deplete conditions when biomass accumulation stopped after 72 h. To analyse this accumulation, TAGs per million cells were plotted in order to normalise TAG content with biomass production (Fig. 4). Unsurprisingly, TAG accumulation was the highest, per million cells, with the 100% mutant strain at the lowest nitrogen concentration (50 mg L−1 NH4Cl). However, the industrial risk of reduced productivity was shown in the co-cultures. Due to the success of the WT growth compared to the mutant strain, TAG productivity can be reduced up to 60% (Fig. 4).

The aim of this study was to compare the growth rates of a C. reinhardtii WT and mutant strain in monocultures and in competition (co-cultures) to evaluate the risk of the mutant strain escaping into the environment, as well as the industrial risk of losing the desirable phenotype of the mutant. The response surface design applied suggests relatively little environmental risk if the mutant escapes the cultivation vessel, but a potentially significant industrial productivity loss if a WT equivalent is introduced. Ultimately, the experimental approach is suggested as a predictor of environmental and industrial risk as the experiments were based on laboratory tests only and under specific conditions. A more comprehensive study of environmental risks would require incorporating the complexities associated with ecosystems, including increased biodiversity and changing environmental conditions.

Abbreviations

μ: 

exponential growth rate

K: 

carrying capacity

RSM: 

response surface model

TAG: 

triglyceride

WT: 

wild-type

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

This study was designed and coordinated by DR, AB and JP. JP, as principal investigator, and AB provided technical and conceptual guidance for all aspects of the project and DR planned and undertook all the practical aspects of the manuscript. The manuscript was written by DR and commented on by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeremy Sweet from Sweet Environmental Consultants for the comments on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the Zenodo repository with the doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.195746.

Funding

This study was funded by Natural Environment Research Council and Technology Strategy Board [NE/J024767/1]. The funding bodies did not participate in any aspect of study design, data collection or manuscript writing.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
AlgaeCytes Ltd.
(2)
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield
(3)
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield

References

  1. Ball S, Marianne T, Dirick L, Fresnoy M, Delrue B, Decq A (1991) A Chlamydomonas reinhardtii low-starch mutant is defective for 3-phosphoglycerate activation and orthophosphate inhibition of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Planta 1:17–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194509
  2. Borowitzka MA, Moheimani NR (2013) Open pond culture systems. In: Borowitzka MA, Moheimani NR (eds) Algae for biofuels and energy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 133–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5479-9_8 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Flynn KJ, Greenwell HC, Lovitt RW, Shields RJ (2010) Selection for fitness at the individual or population levels: modelling effects of genetic modifications in microalgae on productivity and environmental safety. J Theor Biol 263:269–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.12.021 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flynn KJ, Mitra A, Greenwell HC, Sui J (2013) Monster potential meets potential monster: pros and cons of deploying genetically modified microalgae for biofuels production. Interface Focus 3:20120037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2012.0037 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gorman DS, Levine RP (1965) Cytochrome f and plastocyanin: their sequence in the photosynthetic electron transport chain of Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 54:1665–1669View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Gressel J, van der Vlugt CJB, Bergmans HEN (2013) Environmental risks of large scale cultivation of microalgae: mitigation of spills. Algal Res 2:286–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2013.04.002 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Guarnieri MT, Pienkos PT (2015) Algal omics: unlocking bioproduct diversity in algae cell factories. Photosynth Res 123:255–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-014-9989-4 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jinkerson RE, Jonikas MC (2015) Molecular techniques to interrogate and edit the Chlamydomonas nuclear genome. Plant J 82:393–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12801 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lenth RV (2009) Response-surface methods in R, using rsm. J Stat Softw 7:1–17Google Scholar
  10. Li Y, Han D, Hu G, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q (2010) Inhibition of starch synthesis results in overproduction of lipids in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:258–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22807 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, Harris EH, Karpowicz SJ, Witman GB, Terry A, Salamov A, Fritz-Laylin LK, Marechal-Drouard L, Marshall WF, Qu LH, Nelson DR, Sanderfoot AA, Spalding MH, Kapitonov VV, Ren Q, Ferris P, Lindquist E, Shapiro H, Lucas SM, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Cardol P, Cerutti H, Chanfreau G, Chen CL, Cognat V, Croft MT, Dent R, Dutcher S, Fernandez E, Fukuzawa H, Gonzalez-Ballester D, Gonzalez-Halphen D, Hallmann A, Hanikenne M, Hippler M, Inwood W, Jabbari K, Kalanon M, Kuras R, Lefebvre PA, Lemaire SD, Lobanov AV, Lohr M, Manuell A, Meier I, Mets L, Mittag M, Mittelmeier T, Moroney JV, Moseley J, Napoli C, Nedelcu AM, Niyogi K, Novoselov SV, Paulsen IT, Pazour G, Purton S, Ral JP, Riano-Pachon DM, Riekhof W, Rymarquis L, Schroda M, Stern D, Umen J, Willows R, Wilson N, Zimmer SL, Allmer J, Balk J, Bisova K, Chen CJ, Elias M, Gendler K, Hauser C, Lamb MR, Ledford H, Long JC, Minagawa J, Page MD, Pan J, Pootakham W, Roje S, Rose A, Stahlberg E, Terauchi AM, Yang P, Ball S, Bowler C, Dieckmann CL, Gladyshev VN, Green P, Jorgensen R, Mayfield S, Mueller-Roeber B, Rajamani S, Sayre RT, Brokstein P, Dubchak I, Goodstein D, Hornick L, Huang YW, Jhaveri J, Luo Y, Martinez D, Ngau WC, Otillar B, Poliakov A, Porter A, Szajkowski L, Werner G, Zhou K, Grigoriev IV, Rokhsar DS, Grossman AR (2007) The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 318:245–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143609 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pröschold T, Harris EH, Coleman AW (2005) Portrait of a species: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 4:1601–1610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.044503
  13. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramanan R, Kim B-H, Cho D-H, Ko S-R, Oh H-M, Kim H-S (2013) Lipid droplet synthesis is limited by acetate availability in starchless mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FEBS Lett 587:370–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.12.020 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schlesinger DA, Molot LA, Shuter BJ (1981) Specific growth rates of freshwater algae in relation to cell size and light intensity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1052–1058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-145 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Siaut M, Cuine S, Cagnon C, Fessler B, Nguyen M, Carrier P, Beyly A, Beisson F, Triantaphylides C, Li-Beisson Y, Peltier G (2011) Oil accumulation in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: characterization, variability between common laboratory strains and relationship with starch reserves. BMC Biotechnol 11:7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-7 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Snow AA, Smith VH (2012) Genetically engineered algae for biofuels: a key role for ecologists. Bioscience 62:765–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.9 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Donk E (1997) Altered cell wall morphology in nutrient-deficient phytoplankton and its impact on grazers. Limnol Oceanogr 42:357–364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Work VH, Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Meuser JE, Elliott LG, Vinyard DJ, Laurens LM, Dismukes GC, Posewitz MC (2010) Increased lipid accumulation in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sta7-10 starchless isoamylase mutant and increased carbohydrate synthesis in complemented strains. Eukaryot Cell 9:1251–1261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00075-10 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Zabawinski C, Van Den Koornhuyse N, D’Hulst C, Schlichting R, Giersch C, Delrue B, Lacroix J-M, Preiss J, Ball S (2001) Starchless mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii lack the small subunit of a heterotetrameric ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. J Bacteriol 183:1069–1077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.183.3.1069-1077.2001 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017