Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | AMB Express

Fig. 2

From: Enhancement of doxorubicin production in Streptomyces peucetius by genetic engineering and process optimization

Fig. 2

Inactivation of competing pathway genes and overexpression of the resistance genes a Schematic representation of the disruption of the target gene dnrU in S. peucetius. b The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain U1 were verified by PCR. M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain U1 (351 bp in the knockout gene dnrU in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14). c Comparison of doxorubicin production and biomass by the SIPI-7-14 strain and the engineered strains U1, H4 and X1 in shake flasks after 6 days of fermentation. The error bars indicate the standard deviations. d The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain H4 were verified by PCR. M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain H4 (783 bp in the knockout gene dnrH in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14). e The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain X1 were verified by PCR. M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain X1 (1221 bp in the knockout gene dnrX in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14). f The engineered strains U1/drrC, U1/drrAB, U1/drrABC and U1/drrD were generated by overexpressing the resistance genes drrC, drrAB, drrABC and drrD in the parental strain U1, respectively, and were subsequently verified by fermentation in shake flasks to determine their doxorubicin production and biomass. Three parallel shakers were performed for each strain. g The transcription levels of the drrC gene were compared between U1/drrC and U1 by using shake flask fermentation broth collected on the 4th and 6th days. The error bars indicate the standard deviations

Back to article page