Open Access

Biotransformation of caffeoyl quinic acids from green coffee extracts by Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533

  • Rachid Bel-Rhlid1Email author,
  • Dinesh Thapa2,
  • Karin Kraehenbuehl1,
  • Carl Erik Hansen1 and
  • Lutz Fischer3
AMB Express20133:28

DOI: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-28

Received: 8 May 2013

Accepted: 10 May 2013

Published: 21 May 2013


The potential of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 to metabolize chlorogenic acids from green coffee extract was investigated. Two enzymes, an esterase and a hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase (HCD), were involved in this biotransformation. The complete hydrolysis of 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA) into caffeic acid (CA) by L. johnsonii esterase occurred during the first 16 h of reaction time. No dihydrocaffeic acid was identified in the reaction mixture. The decarboxylation of CA into 4-vinylcatechol (4-VC) started only when the maximum concentration of CA was reached (10 μmol/ml). CA was completely transformed into 4-VC after 48 h of incubation. No 4-vinylphenol or other derivatives could be identified in the reaction media. In this study we demonstrate the capability of L. johnsonii to transform chlorogenic acids from green coffee extract into 4-VC in two steps one pot reaction. Thus, the enzymatic potential of certain lactobacilli might be explored to generate flavor compounds from plant polyphenols.


Chlorogenic acid 4-vinylcatechol Esterase Decarboxylase L. johnsonii


Polyphenols have been reported to exert a variety of biological activities, such as free radical scavenging, metal chelating and modulation of enzyme activity ( Sud’ina 1993 ). The main classes of phenolic compounds are hydroxycinnamic acids such as caffeic acid (CA), ferulic acid (FA), and p-coumaric acid (PCA), mainly in esterified form with organic acids, sugars, and lipids. CA (Figure 1) is the major representative of hydroxycinnamic acids and occurs in foods essentially as ester with quinic acid (chlorogenic acids) (Figure 1). Although chlorogenic acids are common in vegetables, the largest amounts are present in coffee ( Clarke 1987 ). These phenolic acids are toxic to some but not all microorganisms. Some Pseudomonas strains, as well as Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, are able to use them as the sole source of carbon for growth ( Overhage 1999 ). Other studies have confirmed the ability of some lactic acid bacteria to metabolize p-coumaric acid into 4-vinylphenol (4-VP) ( Osborn 1997 (van Beek ). One of the mechanisms evolved by microorganisms to counteract phenolic acid toxicity is the induction of enzymes able to metabolize these compounds. Lactic acid bacteria, especially Lactobacillus plantarum 2000 (Barthelmebs ), Pediococcus pentosaceus 2000 (Barghini ) and Pseudomonas fluorescens 1998 ) are able to decarboxylate p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid into vinylphenol, vinylguaiacol and vanillic acid. The decarboxylation is catalyzed by a hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase (HCD). This enzyme was found to be produced by different groups of microorganisms including gram negative bacteria, gram positive bacteria and yeasts. Among the gram positive bacteria only lactic acid bacteria ( Rodriguez 2008 ; van Beek 2000 ; Landete 2007 ) and some Bacillus species ( Torres y Torres 2001 ; Degrassi 1995 ; Cavin 1998 ; Edlin 1998 ) were identified to display HCD activity. This enzymatic activity might be constitutive or induced when the microorganisms are exposed to exogenous chemicals ( Hashidoko 2001 ). The constitutive expression of HCDs has been reported in yeasts and some gram negative bacteria. The yeasts, Brettanomyces anomalus and B. bruxellensis, commonly found in wine, are responsible for the production of flavoring compounds such as 4-vinylphenol, 4- vinylguaiacol, 4-ethylphenol and 4-ethylguaiacol ( Edlin 1998 ; Godoy 2008 ; Morata 2013 ) which are the catalytic products of cinnamic acids mediated by HCD. 4-Vinyl derivatives are considered to contribute to the smoky aroma of cured meat products ( Guillén 1998 ). 4-VG and 4-VP have been approved as flavoring agents by regulatory agencies (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives ( JECFA) 2001 ). 4-Vinyl derivatives have also been reported as potent antioxidants ( Terpinc 2011 ). The HCD activity has been reported in Lactobacillus species ( Rodriguez 2008 2008 ; van Beek 2000 ; Landete 2007 ) but not yet in L. johnsonii. In a previous study we demonstrated the ability of L. johnsonii to hydrolyze rosmarinic acid into caffeic and 3,4-dihydroxyphenyllactic acids ( Bel-Rhlid 2009 ). In the present study, we investigated the in vitro incubation of green coffee extract with L. johnsonii to hydrolyze chlorogenic acids into corresponding hydroxycinnamic acids. These phenolic compounds could be then transformed into corresponding vinylphenols by decarboxylase activity.
Figure 1

Biotransformation of chlorogenic acids into 4-vinylcatechol by L. johnsonii . (A) cinnamoyl esterase activity, (B) hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase activity.

Materials and methods


Caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA) and 4-vinylguaiacol (4-VG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Switzerland). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), sodium phosphate (NaPO4), acetonitrile (HPLC grade), tri-fluoro acetic acid (TFA) and methanol were purchased from Merck (Germany). Green coffee extract (GCE) was produced from 100% whole beans Robusta coffee (decaffeinated) by counter-current gradient extraction at 110-180°C. The extract was concentrated by evaporation to a solid content of 50% and then spray-dried. GCE was stored as a powder at -20°C until further use.


Spray-dried culture powder containing Lactobacillus johnsonii (NCC 533, 1.19 E10 cfu/g) was kindly provided by Nestlé Culture Collection.

Incubation of green coffee extract (GCE) with L. johnsonii NCC 533

GCE (30 mg) and a spray-dried preparation of L. johnsonii (10 mg, 1.19 E10 cfu/g) were suspended in 1 ml phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and incubated at 37°C (Eppendorf, thermomixer) for 24 h. Samples were withdrawn at different reaction times, centrifuged (14000 g, 10 min, 4°C), filtered (0.22 μm), and analyzed by HPLC. The influence of temperature, pH, and oxygen on the reaction rate and yield were studied. For all experiments, a reaction control was run in parallel under the same conditions but without bacteria. No formation of caffeic acid and 4-vinylcatechol was observed in all reaction controls.

Incubation of p-coumaric and caffeic acids with L. johnsonii

p-Coumaric acid (3 μmol/ml) was dissolved in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0). To this suspension, a spray-dried preparation of L. johnsonii (10 mg/ml, 1.19 E10 cfu/g) was added and the mixture incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Bacteria cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed with phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and suspended in a solution of caffeic acid (2.75 μmol/ml, phosphate buffer 50 mM, pH 7.0). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Samples were withdrawn at different reaction times, centrifuged (14000 g, 10 min, 4°C), filtered (0.22 μm), and analyzed by HPLC for the quantification of CA and 4-VC. Similarly, L. johnsonii (10 mg/ml, 1.19 E10 cfu/g) was incubated with CA (2.75 μmol/ml, phosphate buffer 50 mM) at different pHs (5.0, 6.0 and 7.0) for 24 h at 37°C. Samples were withdrawn at different reaction times, centrifuged (14000 g, 10 min, 4°C), filtered (0.22 μm), and analyzed by HPLC.

Liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and liquid

Chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)

Analyses of kinetic study samples were performed on an Agilent-1200 system equipped with a Nucleosil-C18-100-5CC column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) (Macherey-Nagel, Switzerland) and DAD detector. As 4-VC was not commercially available, 4-vinylguaiacol (4-VG) was used as calibrant without correction factor. Stock solutions were prepared by dissolving separately 5-CQA (20 mg), CA (20 mg) and 4-VG (20 mg) in 10 ml methanol-water solution (70:30, v/v). 250, 500, 1000, 3000 and 5000 μl of these stock solutions were then diluted in 10 ml methanol-water (70:30, v/v) and used as standards for calibration curve. Coffee samples were diluted to 1% solid content and filtered over 0.45 μm pore size syringe filters (Millipore). The column was equilibrated with 50% water containing 0.1% TFA (solvent A) and 50% acetonitrile (solvent B) at a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min and column temperature of 40°C. After injection (10 μl), the gradient elution program was as follows: 0-16 min 12% B isocratic, 16-16.5 min 14.9% B, 16.5-25 min 25% B, 25-30 min 25% B, 30-32 min 100% B and post time 5 min with 12% B. Chlorogenic acids; 3-CQA (rt = 4.55 min), 4-CQA (rt = 7.20 min), 5-CQA (rt = 7.99 min); and CA (rt = 9.97 min) were monitored at 325 nm while 4-VC (rt = 22.35 min.) was monitored at 265 nm.

HPLC-MS was performed on an Agilent-1200 tandem ToF (G6210) system equipped with a XDB C-18 column (4, 6 mm × 50 mm, 1.8 μm). The LC-TOF detector was equipped with an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source (ESI) operated in negative mode. Experimental parameters were as follows: charging voltage, 2000 V; capillary voltage, 5000 V; vaporizer temperature, 200°C; nebulizer pressure, 50 psig; drying gas flow, 13.0 L/min; gas temperature, 350°C; octopole DC, 35.50 V; fragmentor, 225 V; octopole RFV, 250 V; and skimmer, 60 V. The eluents were 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 100% methanol (B). The injection volume was 10 μl and a linear gradient from 5% to 67% B in 8 min was used for the separation. 4-VC was detected at a retention time of 3.95 min.

Purification of 4-VC was performed on a Waters preparative HPLC system comprising 2767 sample manager module, 2525 binary gradient pump module and 2996 photodiode array detector module. The separation was achieved on an Xterra preparative column RP18 OBD 5 μm, 19 × 150 mm and guard column RP18 5 μm, 19 × 10 mm. The solvents used were water containing 0.1% v/v of TFA (A) and acetonitrile 100% (B). 1 ml of GCE treated with L. johnsonii was injected. The following gradient and flow rate conditions were applied: 0 min 15% B 5 ml/min., 2 min 15% B 20 ml/min., 12 min 25% B 20 ml/min., 13 min 100% B 20 ml/min., then wash with 100% B for 5 min and re-equilibrate at initial conditions for 2 min. Fractions eluting between 8.5-9.2 min were collected, concentrated to 10 ml under slight vacuum (200 mbar) and further evaporated to dryness under high vacuum at a temperature between -60°C and 0°C.

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

NMR data were acquired on a Bruker AVANCE DPX360 NMR spectrometer operating at a frequency of 360.13 MHz for 1H and 90.55 MHz for 13C at 25°C. Samples were prepared in d6-dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6, 99.9 atom % D; Sigma-Aldrich). Chemical shifts were measured in parts per million (ppm) values relative to that of the solvent (residual DMSO [H 2.50; C 39.5]). 1D NMR spectra were recorded (7183.91 Hz) with 256 or 512 data points zero filled to 256 or 512. 13C spectra were acquired with 2 K data points zero filled to 16 K. 13C spectra were recorded by using the DEPT pulse with proton pulse at 135 degrees. The spectra were measured under proton decoupling during acquisition and with DEPT polarization transfer pulse sequence. Homonuclear 1H-1H correlation (COSY) was achieved with 1H spectral width between 3033.98 and 7183.91 Hz and using eCOSY sequence with gradient pulses for selection. The data were recorded in 2 K data points in t2 and 128 data points in t1. Data were treated using TopSpin (version 1.3, Bruker GmbH).

δH (360 MHz; DMSO-d6) 4.97 (1 H, dd, J 1.2 and 10.9, =CH2), 5.45 (1 H, dd, J 1.2 and 17.5, =CH), 6.50 (1 H, dd, J 10.9 and 17.5, =CH2), 6.6-6.7 (2 H, m, ArH), 6.81 (1 H, d, ArH), 8.92 (2 H, br s, OH); δC (90 MHz; DMSO-d6) 110.5, 113.2, 115.7, 118.2, 129.0, 136.9, 145.3, 145.8.


Treatment of green coffee extract (GCE) with L. Johnsonii NCC 533

GCE was incubated with L. johnsonii for 24 h and samples were withdrawn after 0, 16 and 24 h of reaction time and analyzed by HPLC. As shown in Figure 2, during the first 16 h of incubation, the concentration of chlorogenic acids decreased and that of CA increased to reach a maximum of 10 μmol/ml. After 24 h of reaction time, the concentration of CA decreased and 4-VC was produced (7.5 μmol/ml). These results suggest that chlorogenic acids were hydrolyzed by L. johnsonii esterase into quinic and caffeic acids and then CA was transformed into 4-VC by a hydroxycinnamic acid decarboxylase (HCD) (Figure 1). No formation of CA and 4-VC was observed in the reaction controls.
Figure 2

Bionconversion of chlorogenic acid (5-CQA) (&z.squf;) and formation of caffeic acid (red square symbol) and 4-vinylcatechol (light green square symbol) from green coffee extract by L. johnsonii at 37°C. Values are mean of three different experiments.

Purification and characterisation of 4-VC

4-VC was purified by preparative RP-HPLC. Upon concentration it tended to undergo quick polymerization. Therefore the final evaporation to dryness was conducted under low temperature and high vacuum. Its chemical structure was elucidated by analytical LC-ToF-MS and NMR (1H, 13C, COSY, DEPT). The molecular mass of 135.061 was measured in the negative mode which was a good match with the mono-isotopic mass of 136.052, expected for 4-VC. 1H and 13C-NMR data were identical to those described in literature ( Nomura 2005 ).

Reaction kinetics

The kinetic behavior of the formation of CA and 4-VC was studied. Reactions were performed in phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) at 37°C. As shown in Figure 3, the concentration of CA increased during the first 16 h of incubation and the pH decreased from 7.0 to 6.0. After 16 h of reaction time, 4-VC started to be produced to reach the concentration of 10.4 μmol/ml after 48 h.
Figure 3

Kinetics of the generation of caffeic acid (green diamond symbol) and 4-vinylcatechol (blue circle) from green coffee extract by L. johnsonii at 37&z.ousco;C. Variation of pH during reaction (red triangle symbol). Values are mean of three different experiments.

Effect of temperature on the formation of CA and 4-VC

The effect of temperature on the formation of CA and 4-VC was studied. Figure 4 shows that the formation of CA and 4-VC was influenced by the temperature. For the CA, no significant difference was observed when the reaction was performed at 30°C or 37°C, whereas at 50°C the reaction rate was much faster. Indeed, at 50°C a concentration of 8.9 μmol/ml of CA was reached after only 6 h of incubation as compared to 5.4 μmol/ml and 5.2 μmol/ml at 30°C and 37°C, respectively. The highest concentration of 4-VC (8.8 μmol/ml) was obtained at 37°C and after 30 h of reaction time, while no 4-VC was produced at 50°C.
Figure 4

Effect of temperature on the generation of caffeic acid (solid lines) and 4-VC (dotted lines). Incubation of L. johnsonii with green coffee extract was performed at 30°C (red diamond symbol), 37°C (green circle), and 50°C (×). Values are mean of three different experiments.

Effect of pH on the formation of CA and 4-VC

The influence of pH on the formation of CA and 4-VC was studied. Figures 5 and 6 show the formation of CA and 4-VC, respectively, at pH values of 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0. Reactions were carried out using L. johnsonii and GCE at 37°C. Constant pH was adjusted by continuous titration with sodium hydroxide (0.1 N). 4-VC was not produced at pH 7.0. The maximum concentration of 4-VC was reached at pH 6.0, while no significant difference was observed at pH 5.0 and 6.0 for the formation of CA.
Figure 5

Effect of pH on the formation of caffeic acid from green coffee extract by L. johnsonii at 37°C and pH 5.0 (blue diamond symbol), pH 6.0 (red rectangle symbol) and pH 7.0 (light green triangle symbol). Values are mean of three different experiments.
Figure 6

Effect of pH on the formation of 4-vinylcatechol from green coffee extract by L. johnsonii at 37°C and pH 5.0 (blue diamond symbol), pH 6.0 (red rectangle symbol) and pH 7.0 (light green triangle symbol). Values are mean of three different experiments.

Effect of anaerobic conditions on the formation of CA and 4-VC

Figure 7 shows the influence of anaerobic conditions (nitrogen) on the generation of CA and 4-VC. As compared to aerobic conditions (Figure 3), anaerobic conditions slowed down the formation rate and yield of CA and 4-VC. Indeed, after 26 h of incubation, only 4.8 μmol/ml of CA was formed under anaerobic conditions as compared to aerobic conditions (8.5 μmol/ml). Similarly, after 48 h of reaction time, only 6.8 μmol/ml of 4-VC was generated under anaerobic conditions which is much lower compared to 10.4 μmol/ml produced under aerobic conditions.
Figure 7

Formation of caffeic acid (light green triangle symbol) and 4-vinylcatechol (blue circle) from green coffee extract by L. johnsonii under anaerobic condition and at 37°C. Initial pH 7.0 was not controlled during the reaction. Values are mean of three different experiments.

p-coumaric and caffeic acids do not induce HCD activity in L. johnsonii

p-Coumaric and caffeic acids have been reported to induce the expression of HCD in Klebsiella oxytoca JCM1665 ( Hashidoko 2001 ) and in L. plantarum 748T ( Rodriguez 2008 ; Cavin 1997 ) at a concentration of 2 mM to 3 mM.

In this study, L. johnsonii was incubated with p-coumaric acid at a concentration of 3 mM in order to induce the HCD activity. Under these reaction conditions no 4-vinylphenol could be identified in the reaction media even after 48 h of reaction time. Pure caffeic acid was also not transformed into 4-VC under the same reaction conditions. The activity test was performed at three different pHs and in all trials caffeic acid was not transformed by L. johnsonii and no 4-VC could be identified in the reaction mixture (data not shown).


Chlorogenenic acids (CQA) are found in wide range of vegetables and fruits and are particularly abundant in green coffee (6 – 10% dry basis) ( Clarke 1987 ). Roasting of green coffee beans reduces the amount of chlorogenic acids (2.5-4.0%) ( Debry 1994 ) and hypothetical chemical degradation pathway has been proposed ( Franck 2007 ; Müller 2007 ). On the other hand, intestinal microorganisms ( Couteau 2001 ; Monteiro 2007 ) and other lactic acid bacteria ( Guglielmetti 2008 ) were shown to be able to transform chlorogenic acids into caffeic and quinic acids by cinnamoyl esterase. Several other studies reported on the decarboxylation of hydroxycinnamic acids (e.g. caffeic acid, ferulic acid) into vinyl phenols by bacteria and yeasts ( Plumb 1999 ; Huang 1994 ; Hashidoko 2001 ; Rodriguez 2008 ; Curiel 2010 ). However, to our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on two step, one pot bioconversion of caffeoyl quinic acids into 4-VC by the same microorganism (Figure 1). Our study reveals that L. johnsonii NCC 533 exhibits a chlorogenate esterase and a hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase like activities when incubated with green coffee extract for 24 h at 37°C. The chlorogenate esterase from L. johnsonii was already identified, cloned, and characterized ( Bel-Rhlid 2009 ; Kim 2009 ). This enzyme showed high affinity and catalytic efficiency toward aromatic compounds such as chlorogenic acids. HCD has never been reported in L. johnsonii NCC 533. To explore both enzymatic activities synergistically, L. johnsonii was used as whole cell and it was incubated with GCE in a one pot reaction system. The formation kinetics of CA and 4-VC were studied under different reaction conditions. The first reaction, hydrolysis of chlorogenic acids into CA, started quickly, and the highest concentration of CA was generated after 16 h of incubation. After this level of CA was reached, the second reaction, decarboxylation of CA, was started, and after 28 h of reaction time a plateau was reached with maximum concentration of 4-VC. In the literature, the most frequently observed metabolic pathway of CA is by decarboxylation ( Landete 2007 ; Cavin 1997 ; de las Rivas 2009 ) and further reduction to yield 4-ethylcatechol ( Peppercorn 1971 ; Landete 2007 ). Alternatively, CA can be reduced to dihydrocaffeic acid which is then dehydroxylated into m-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid. In our study, neither 4-ethylcatechol nor dihydrocaffeic acid were identified in the reaction mixture. Similar results have been reported for Lactobacillus brevis strains ( Curiel 2010 ).

HCD activity was reported to be sensitive to the effects of temperature and pH and this sensitivity depends on the type of microorganisms ( Degrassi 1995 ; Cavin 1998 ; Benito 2009 ). In this study, we observed that both reactions, A and B (Figure 1), were markedly influenced by the temperature and pH. Higher temperatures accelerated the rate of formation of CA. At 50°C, reaction A was completed within 6 h, whereas reaction B was completely inhibited (Figure 4). The optimum temperature and pH for HCD activity was found to be 37°C and 6.0, respectively. Similar observations have been made for p (Degrassi -coumarate decarboxylase from Bacillus pumilus 1995 ) where optimum temperature and pH were 37°C, and 5.5, respectively. The decarboxylase activity was lost above 42°C and 100% activity was exhibited at a pH range of 5.0 to 6.0. A broad range of temperature and pH has been reported for p-coumarate decarboxylase from Bacillus subtilis. High activity was observed in temperature range of 30°C to 55°C and pH range of 4.0 to 6.0.

Although the anaerobic degradation of aromatic compounds is not well explored, few studies have shown that decarboxylation reaction may play important initiating roles in the usage of aromatic compounds under anaerobic conditions ( Krumholz 1986 ; Hsu 1990 ). The biotransformation of CQA into 4-VC by L. johnsonii (Degrassi was successfully performed under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Similar results were observed for Bacillus pumilus 1995 ), where the study demonstrated that p-coumarate decarboxylase activity was not oxygen dependent. In the case of L. johnsonii, the biotransformation rate of CQA into 4-VC was delayed by anaerobic conditions and the final concentration of 4-VC was only 6.75 μmol/ml as compared to 9 μmol/ml obtained under aerobic conditions. In both cases, CA was completely consumed. This suggests that the decarboxylation of CA stopped due to substrate limitation and not to the influence of oxygen. The HCD activity in our studied conditions relies on the catalytic activity of chlorogenate esterase as well. As a result, less CA was produced in the mixture under anaerobic conditions as compared to aerobic conditions.

p-Coumaric and caffeic acids have already been shown to induce the expression of HCD at a concentration of 2 mM to 3 mM in Klebsiella oxytoca JCM1665 ( Hashidoko 2001 ) and in L. plantarum 748T ( Rodriguez 2008 ; Cavin 1997 ). These chemical inducers were also substrates for HCD activity. To investigate the induction of HCD activity in L. johnsonii NCC 533, the bacterium was preincubated with p-coumaric and caffeic acids separately and the HCD activity was tested with CA as substrate. The cells did not transform CA at all tested reaction conditions. This leaves the assumption that GCE contains some unknown substance which might regulate the expression of HCD in L. johnsonii. Moreover, the cell count of La1 decreased by 10-fold during the first 16 h of reaction and reached a little higher account than the initial one after 24 h. The slow dying off of cells might be due to the high concentration of CA reached after 16 h of reaction time. At this point, the cells commenced detoxifying the toxic effect of CA by transforming this compound into 4-VC and started again to grow slowly. The same observation was reported in L. plantarum (Barthelmebs and P. pentosaceus 2001 ). However, further experimental work will be required to confirm these hypotheses and to understand the induction and/or activation mechanism of HCD in L. johnsonii. The purification and characterization of this enzyme has to be also explored in the future.

In summary, in this study we showed the ability of L. johnsonii to transform caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA) from green coffee extract into 4-VC. The results obtained indicate that two enzymes, an esterase and a hydroxycinnamic decarboxylase, were involved in this biotransformation. Thus, the enzymatic potential of certain lactobacilli might be explored to produce flavor compounds or to enhance bioactivity of plant phenolic compounds.



The authors are grateful to Nicole Page-Zoerkler and Olivier Mauroux for their technical assistant. We thank David Pridmore and Kimo Makkinen for critical reading of this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Nestec Ltd, Nestlé Research Centre
Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health Gut, Health/Microbial Biochemistry, University of Aberdeen
Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart)


  1. Barghini P, Montebove F, Ruzzi M, Schiesser A: Optimal conditions for bioconversion of ferulic acid into vanillic acid by Pseudomonas fluorescens BF13 cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 49: 309–314. 10.1007/s002530051174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthelmebs L, Lecomte B, Divies C, Cavin JF: Induced metabolism of phenolic acids in Pediococcus pentosaceus is encoded by an autoregulated operon which involves a new class of negative transcriptional regulator. J Bacteriol 2000, 182: 6724–6731. 10.1128/JB.182.23.6724-6731.2000PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthelmebs L, Divies C, Cavin JF: Molecular characterization of the phenolic acid metabolism in the lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum . Lait 2001, 81: 161–171. 10.1051/lait:2001120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bel-Rhlid R, Crespy V, Page-Zoerkler N, Nagy K, Raab T, Hansen CE: Hydrolysis of rosmarinic acid from rosemary extract with esterases and Lactobacillus johnsonii in-vitro and in a gastro-intestinal model. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57: 7700–7705. 10.1021/jf9014262PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Benito S, Palomero F, Morata A, Calderón F, Suá rez-Lepe JA: A method for estimating Dekkera/Brettanomyces polulations in wines. J Appl Microbiol 2009, 106: 1743–1751. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04137.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavin JF, Barthelmebs L, Guzzo J, van Beeumen J, Samyn B, Travers JF, Divies C: Purification and characterization of an inducible p -coumaric acid decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997, 147: 291–295. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10256.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavin JF, Dartois V, Divies C: Gene cloning, transcriptional analysis, purification, and characterization of phenolic acid decarboxylase from Bacillus subtilis . Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64: 1466–1471.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke RJ: Coffee technology. In Quality control in the food industry. 2nd edition. Edited by: Herschdoefer SH. London: Academic; 1987:161–191.Google Scholar
  9. Couteau D, Mccartney AL, Gibson GR, Williamson G, Faulds CB: Isolation and characterization of human colonic bacteria able to hydrolyze chlorogenic acid. J Appl Microbiol 2001, 90: 873–881. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01316.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Curiel JA, Rodriguez H, Landete JM, de las Rives B, Munoz R: Ability of Lactobacillus brevis strains to degrade food phenolic acids. Food Chem 2010, 120: 225–229. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. De Las Rivas B, Rodriguez H, Curiel JA, Landete JM, Munoz R: Molecular screening of wine lactic acid bacteria degrading hydroxycinnamic acids. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57: 490–494. 10.1021/jf803016pPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Debry G: Coffee and health. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Degrassi G, de Laureto PP, Bruschi CV: Purification and characterization of ferulate and p -coumarate decarboxylase from Bacillus pumilus . Appl Environ Microbiol 1995, 61: 326–332.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Edlin DAN, Narbad A, Gasson MJ, Dickinson JR, Lloyd D: Purification and characterization of hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase from Brettanomyces anomalus . Enzyme Microb Technol 1998, 22: 232–239. 10.1016/S0141-0229(97)00169-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck O, Blumberg S, Kunert C, Zehentbauer G, Hofmann T: Structure determination and sensory analysis of bitter-tasting 4-vinylcatechol oligomers and their identification in roasted coffee by means of LC-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55: 1945–1954. 10.1021/jf0632280View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Godoy L, Martinez C, Carrasco N, Ganga MA: Purification and characterization of a p -courmarate decarboxylase and a vinylphenol reductase from Brettanomyces bruxellensis . Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 127: 6–11. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.011PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Guglielmetti S, De Noni I, Caracciolo F, Molinari F, Parini C, Mora D: Bacterial cinnamoyl esterase activity screening for the production of a novel functional food product. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74: 1284–1288. 10.1128/AEM.02093-07PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillén MD, Ibargoitia ML: New components with potential antioxidant and organoleptic properties, detected for the first time in liquid smoke flavouring preparations. J Agric Food Chem 1998, 46: 1276–1285. 10.1021/jf970952xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hashidoko Y, Tanaka T, Tahara S: Induction of 4-hydroxycinnamate decarboxylase in Klebsiella oxytoca cells exposed to substrates and non-substrate 4-hydroxycinnamate analogs. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2001, 65: 2604–2612. 10.1271/bbb.65.2604PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu T, Lux MF, Drake HL: Expression of an aromatic-dependent decarboxylase which provides growth-essential CO 2 equivalents for the acetogenic (Wood) pathway of Clostridium thermoaceticum . J Bacteriol 1990, 172: 5901–5907.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang Z, Dostal L, Rosazza JPN: Purification and characterization of a ferulic acid decarboxylase from Pseudomonas fluorescens . J Bacteriol 1994, 176: 5912–5918.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives 55th report of the joint WHO/FAO expert committee on food additives . WHO Technical Report series 901. In Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Geneve, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Kim KL, Lorca GL, Gonzalez CF: Biochemical properties of two cinnamoyl esterases purified from a Lactobacillus johnsonii strain isolated from stool samples of diabetes-resistant rats. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 5018–5024. 10.1128/AEM.02837-08View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Krumholz LR, Bryant MP: Eubacterium oxidoreducens sp. nov. requiring H 2 or formate to degrade gallate pyrogallol, phloroglucinol and quercetin. Arch Microbiol 1986, 144: 8–14. 10.1007/BF00454948View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Landete JM, Rodriguez H, de Las Rivas B, Munoz R: High-added-value antioxidants obtained from the degradation of wine phenolics by Lactobacillus plantarum . J Food Prot 2007, 70: 2670–2675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Monteiro A, Farah A, Perrone D, Trugo LC, Donangelo C: Chlorogenic acid compounds from coffee are differentially absorbed and metabolized in humans. J Nutr 2007, 137: 2196–2201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Morata A, Vejarano R, Ridolfi G, Benito S, Palomero F, Uthurry C, Tesfaye W, Gonzáles C, Suárez-Lepe JA: Reduction of 4-ethylphenol production in red wines using HCDC + -yeasts and cinnamyl esterases. Enzyme Microb Technol 2013, 52: 99–104. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.11.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller C, Hofmann T: Quantitative studies on the formation of phenol/2-furfurylthiol conjugates in coffee beverages toward the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of coffee aroma staling. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55: 4095–4102. 10.1021/jf070095pPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nomura E, Hosoda A, Mori H, Taniguchi H: Rapid base-catalyzed decarboxylation and amide-forming reaction of substituted cinnamic acids via microwave heating. Green Chem 2005, 7: 863–866. 10.1039/b510626eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Osborn AM, Bruce KD, Strike P, Ritchie DA: Distribution, diversity and evolution of the bacterial mercury resistance (mer) operon. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1997, 19: 239–262. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00300.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Overhage J, Prieffert H, Steinbuechel A: Biochemical and genetic analyses of ferulic acid catabolism in Pseudomonas sp. strain HR199. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65: 4837–4847.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Peppercorn MA, Goldman P: Caffeic acid metabolism by bacteria of the human gastrointestinal tract. J Bacteriol 1971, 108: 996–1000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Plumb G, Garcia-Conesa MT, Kroon P, Rhodes M, Saxon R, Williamson G: Metabolism of chlorogenic acid by human plasma, liver, intestine and gut microflora. J Sci Food Agric 1999, 79: 390–392. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990301)79:3<390::AID-JSFA258>3.0.CO;2-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodriguez H, Landete JM, de las Rivas B, Munoz R: Metabolism of food phenolic acids by Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748 T . Food Chem 2008, 107: 1393–1398. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez H, Landete JM, Curiel JA, de las Rivas B, Mancheno JM, Munoz R: Characterization of the p-coumaric acid decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748 T . J Agric Food Chem 2008, 56: 3068–3072. 10.1021/jf703779sPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sud’ina GF, Mirzoeva OK, Pushkareva MA, Korshunova GA, Sumbatyan NV, Varfolomeev SD: Caffeic acid phenethyl ester as a lipoxygenase inhibitor with antioxidant properties. FEBS Lett 1993, 329: 21–24. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80184-VPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Terpinc P, Polak T, Segatin N, Hanzlowsky A, Ulrih NP, Abramovic H: Antioxidant properties of 4-vinyl derivatives of hydroxycinnamic acids. Food Chem 2011, 128: 62–69. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.077PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Torres y Torres JL, Rosazza JPN: Microbial transformations of p -coumaric acid by Bacillus megaterium and Curvularia lunata . J Nat Prod 2001, 64: 1408–1414. 10.1021/np010238gPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. van Beek S, Priest FG: Decarboxylation of substituted cinnamic acids by lactic acid bacteria isolated during malt whisky fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66: 5322–5328. 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5322-5328.2000PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Bel-Rhlid et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.