Dehalogenimonas spp. can Reductively Dehalogenate High Concentrations of 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, and 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
© Maness et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 1 October 2012
Accepted: 2 October 2012
Published: 9 October 2012
The contaminant concentrations over which type strains of the species Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens and Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens were able to reductively dechlorinate 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP), and 1,1,2-trichloroethane (1,1,2-TCA) were evaluated. Although initially isolated from an environment with much lower halogenated solvent concentrations, D. alkenigignens IP3-3T was found to reductively dehalogenate chlorinated alkanes at concentrations comparable to D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T. Both species dechlorinated 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA present at initial concentrations at least as high as 8.7, 4.0, and 3.5 mM, respectively. The ability of Dehalogenimonas spp. to carry out anaerobic reductive dechlorination even in the presence of high concentrations of chlorinated aliphatic alkanes has important implications for remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater.
KeywordsBioremediation Chlorinated alkanes Dehalogenimonas Reductive dechlorination Dehalogenation
In industry, polychlorinated ethanes and propanes are used as solvents, degreasing agents, and paint removers; they are also globally produced on a massive scale as intermediates during production of other industrially important chemicals ([De Wildeman and Verstraete, 2003]; [Field and Sierra-Alvarez, 2004]). Due to spills and past disposal methods, these chlorinated organic compounds are prevalent groundwater and soil contaminants. For example, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) is present in at least 570 current or former Superfund sites [(ATSDR 2001]), and 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) is present at more than 100 Superfund sites ([Fletcher et al., 2009]). The prevalence of these polychlorinated alkanes as environmental contaminants is of concern because of their known or suspected toxicity and/or carcinogenicity ([ATSDR, 2001]; ).
Anaerobic reductive dechlorination, a process in which microorganisms utilize chlorinated organics as electron acceptors, represents a potentially viable method for cleanup of many contaminated sites ([Christ et al., 2005]; [Fennell et al., 2001]; [He et al., 2005]; [Major et al., 2002]). Previous studies on reductive dechlorination of halogenated alkanes have generally been conducted in a relatively narrow range of low (e.g., 0.1 to 0.5 mM) contaminant concentrations ([Chen et al., 1996]; [De Wildeman et al., 2003]; [Fletcher et al., 2009]; [Grostern and Edwards, 2006, 2009]; [Lorah and Olsen, 1999]; [Maymó-Gatell et al., 1999]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Contaminant concentrations considerably higher than this range are present at some sites, however, particularly in areas where pollutants remain in the subsurface as dense non-aqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs) ([Bowman et al., 2006]; [Marzorati et al., 2007]; [Yan et al., 2009b]).
Among the limited number of microbes known to anaerobically reductively dehalogenate polychlorinated ethanes and propanes are strains of Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens ([Moe et al., 2009]; [Yan et al., 2009a]) and Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens ([Bowman et al., 2012]). These species cluster in the phylum Chloroflexi, related to but distinct from organohalide respiring Dehalococcoides strains ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Löffler et al., 2012]; [Moe et al., 2009]). Strains of both Dehalogenimonas species reductively dehalogenate 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA via dichloroelimination reactions with H2 as an electron donor, forming final products of ethene, propene, and vinyl chloride, respectively ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Yan et al., 2009a]).
Previously reported studies of Dehalogenimonas strains were conducted only at initial chlorinated solvent concentrations of 0.5 mM ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Research reported here was aimed at evaluating the solvent concentration ranges over which D. lykanthroporepellens and D. alkenigignens can reductively dechlorinate 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA in order to assess their suitability for bioremediation of high contaminant concentrations.
Materials and methods
Experiments were carried out in 25 mL glass serum bottles (Wheaton) sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum crimp caps. Each serum bottle contained 10 mL titanium-citrate reduced anaerobic basal medium prepared as described by ([Moe et al. 2009]) except that 5 mM acetate was replaced with 0.05 mM each of acetate, pyruvate, and lactate. The 15 mL gas headspace was comprised of H2/N2 (80%/20%, v/v). Replicate serum bottles were spiked with neat, filter sterilized 1,2-DCA (>99.8% purity, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 1,2-DCP (99%, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), or 1,1,2-TCA (96%, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to achieve target initial aqueous phase concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 15 mM after dissolution and equilibration.
Each serum bottle received 0.3 mL inoculum (3% v/v) of D. alkenigignens strain IP3-3T (=JCM 17062T =NRRL B-59545T) or D. lykanthroporepellens strain BL-DC-9T (=JCM 15061T = ATCC BAA-1523T) previously grown on 1,2-DCP. Incubation was in the dark at 30oC without shaking. Triplicate bottles were sacrificed at time zero and after eight weeks incubation for analysis of chlorinated solvents and potential degradation products. To account for potential abiotic reactions, triplicate negative controls prepared in the same manner as inoculated bottles but without bacterial addition were incubated under identical conditions.
Chlorinated solvents and degradation products were measured using an HP model 6890 gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector and GS-GasPro capillary column (60 m × 0.32 mm I.D., J&W P/N 113–4362) as described previously ([Yan et al., 2009a]). Gas headspace samples collected in 100 μL gas-tight glass syringes (Hamilton, Baton Rouge, LA) were introduced to the GC via direct injection. Aqueous samples (500 μL) were introduced to the GC via a Tekmar 2016/3000 purge and trap autosampler and concentrator. Both gas-headspace and aqueous-phase aliquots were analyzed for each sample bottle.
Hydrogen concentrations in the gas headspace were measured using an SRI Instruments model 310 gas chromatograph (Torrence, CA) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and molecular sieve column (Alltech Molesieve 5A 80/100) as described previously ([van Ginkel et al., 2001]).
The production of ethene (Figure 1) coupled with 1,2-DCA disappearance in the inoculated bottles is consistent with the 1,2-DCA dihaloelimination degradation pathway reported previously for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykantroporepellens BL-DC-9T in tests conducted with initial 1,2-DCA concentrations of 0.5 mM in serum bottles containing H2 at an initial concentration of 10% v/v (as opposed to the 80% v/v employed in the present study) ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Trace levels of 1-chloroethane (<0.3 μmol/bottle) were detected at comparable levels in both inoculated bottles and in uninoculated abiotic controls (data not shown) and small amounts of ethene (<0.7 μmol/bottle) were detected in abiotic negative controls (Figure 1) indicating that some abiotic 1,2-DCA transformation occurred in the anaerobic medium employed here, but the amount was negligible. The sum of parent compound (i.e., 1,2-DCA) plus daughter product (i.e., ethene and 1-chloroethane) in replicate serum bottles inoculated with the bacterial strains ranged from 74-107% of the mass determined in abiotic negative controls (average 89%). Dechlorination was essentially complete (< 1% of the starting 1,2-DCA remaining) at the end of the eight week incubation period for serum bottles supplemented with 1,2-DCA at initial concentrations less than 3.16 ± 0.05 mM and 1.48 ± 0.03 mM (mean ± standard deviation) for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively (Figure 1). At higher initial 1,2-DCA concentrations (at and to the right of concentrations denoted by arrows in Figure 1), untransformed 1,2-DCA remained at the end of the eight week incubation in amounts increasing with increasing initial 1,2-DCA concentration.
The quantity of ethene observed increased with increasing initial 1,2-DCA concentration in the range of 0.5 to approximately 4 mM (maximum ethene observed in bottles containing initial 1,2-DCA concentrations of 4.03 ± 0.09 and 4.08 ± 0.16 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively) and then decreased at higher initial 1,2-DCA concentrations. The decrease in ethene production as 1,2-DCA concentrations increased indicates that sufficiently high 1,2-DCA concentrations can inhibit dechlorination activity of both Dehalogenimonas spp. Biologically mediated 1,2-DCA reductive dechlorination, however, was observed in serum bottles with initial 1,2-DCA concentrations as high as 9.81 ± 0.98 and 8.69 ± 0.26 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively. At higher initial 1,2-DCA concentrations, small amounts of ethene were also detected, but in amounts that were not statistically different from abiotic negative controls at a confidence level of 95%.
The production of propene (Figure 2) coupled with 1,2-DCP dechlorination in the inoculated bottles is consistent with the previously reported tests conducted with 0.5 mM 1,2-DCP in serum bottles with 10% v/v H2 in the gas headspace ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Trace levels of 1-chloropropane (<0.03 μmol/bottle) were detected in inoculated bottles and uninoculated abiotic controls (data not shown), and propene was detected in relatively minute quantities (<0.13 μmol/bottle) in abiotic negative controls (Figure 2), indicating small amounts of abiotic 1,2-DCP transformation. The sum of parent chlorinated solvent (i.e., 1,2-DCP) and daughter products (i.e., propene and 1-chloropropane) in replicate bottles inoculated with the bacterial strains ranged from 74-131% of the mass determined in abiotic negative controls (average 95%). When provided with 1,2-DCP at initial aqueous-phase concentrations less than 3.19 ± 0.20 mM and 2.14 ± 0.12 mM, dechlorination of 1,2-DCP to a final product of propene was essentially complete in bottles inoculated with D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively, with <1% of the starting 1,2-DCP remaining at the end of the eight week incubation period (Figure 2). At higher initial 1,2-DCP concentrations (denoted by arrows in Figure 2), 1,2-DCP remained at the end of eight weeks in amounts increasing with increasing initial 1,2-DCP concentration.
Similar to what was observed with 1,2-DCA, the quantity of propene formed from 1,2-DCP dechlorination increased at initial 1,2-DCP concentrations ranging from 0.5 to roughly 3 mM (maximum propene was observed in bottles containing initial 1,2-DCP concentrations of 3.21 ± 0.46 and 3.08 ± 0.05 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively) and then decreased at higher initial 1,2-DCP concentrations. This indicates that beyond a certain threshold, as was observed with 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP became inhibitory to dechlorination activity. Nevertheless, 1,2-DCP reductive dechlorination was observed in serum bottles with initial 1,2-DCP concentrations as high as 5.05 ± 0.29 and 4.02 ± 0.09 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively. At higher initial 1,2-DCP concentrations, propene was also detected, but in amounts that were not statistically different from abiotic negative controls at a 95% confidence level.
In contrast to the relatively high concentrations of 1,2-DCP that were dechlorinated by Dehalogenimonas spp. in the present study, ([Löffler et al. 1997]) reported that 1,2-DCP dechlorination by an undefined mixed culture derived from Red Cedar Creek sediment (Michigan, USA) was completely inhibited when 1,2-DCP was supplied in amounts corresponding to an aqueous phase concentration of roughly 0.9 mM or higher. D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T may be better suited to degradation of higher 1,2-DCP concentrations than other microbial populations studied previously.
Vinyl chloride production (Figure 3) coupled with 1,1,2-TCA dechlorination in the inoculated bottles is consistent with the previously reported tests conducted with 0.5 mM 1,1,2-TCA in serum bottles with 10% v/v H2 in the gas headspace ([Bowman et al., 2012]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Low levels of 1,2-DCA (< 1.5 μmol/bottle) were observed in both inoculated bottles and uninoculated negative controls (data not shown), and small quantities vinyl chloride (<1 μmol/bottle) were observed in abiotic negative controls (Figure 3), indicating some abiotic 1,1,2-TCA transformation but in comparatively small amounts. The sum of the parent solvent (i.e., 1,1,2-TCA) and the daughter products (i.e., 1,2-DCA and vinyl chloride) in replicate bottles inoculated with the bacterial strains ranged from 74-146% of the mass determined in abiotic negative controls (average 99%). Dechlorination was essentially complete (<1% 1,1,2-TCA remaining) after 8 weeks incubation when D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T were supplied with initial 1,1,2-TCA aqueous-phase concentrations below 2.42 ± 0.22 mM and 1.65 ± 0.03 mM, respectively (Figure 3). At higher initial concentrations, untransformed 1,1,2-TCA remained at the end of the incubation period.
Similar to what was observed with 1,2-DCA and 1,2-DCP, the quantity of vinyl chloride formed from 1,1,2-TCA dechlorination increased at initial 1,1,2-TCA concentrations ranging from 0.5 to roughly 2 mM and then decreased at higher initial 1,1,2-TCA concentrations (Figure 3). Maximum vinyl chloride concentrations were observed in bottles containing initial 1,1,2-TCA concentrations of 1.82 ± 0.18 and 1.65 ± 0.03 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively. This indicates that beyond a certain threshold, as was observed with 1,2-DCA and 1,2-DCP, 1,1,2-TCA became inhibitory to dechlorination activity. Nevertheless, biologically mediated 1,1,2-TCA reductive dechlorination was observed in serum bottles with initial 1,1,2-TCA concentrations as high as 3.49 ± 0.31 and 3.80 ± 0.42 mM for D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, respectively. At higher initial 1,1,2-TCA concentrations, small amounts of vinyl chloride were also detected, but in amounts that were not statistically different from abiotic negative controls at a confidence level of 95%.
Hydrogen (H2) remained at relatively high concentrations (>62%, v/v) in the gas headspace at the end of the eight-week incubation period for all chlorinated solvent concentrations tested for both strains, indicating that it was not stoichiometrically limiting.
As a basis for comparing the concentrations tested here relative to saturation concentrations, solubility in water at 20°C is 86.1 mM for 1,2-DCA ([Horvath et al., 1999]), 23.9 mM for 1,2-DCP ([Horvath et al., 1999]), and 32.9 mM for 1,1,2-TCA (ATSDR ). Also as a basis for comparison, groundwater in the well from which D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T was isolated had 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA concentrations that averaged 5.5 mM, 0.6 mM, and 2.8 mM, respectively ([Bowman et al., 2006]; [Yan et al., 2009a]). Results determined here indicate that both D. alkenigignens IP3-3T and D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T can reductively dehalogenate 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA at concentrations comparable to those present in the DNAPL source zone area of the Brooklawn area of the PPI site.
D. alkenigignens IP3-3T was isolated from groundwater contaminated with 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA at concentrations of 0.023 mM, 0.021 mM, and 0.010 mM, respectively ([Bowman et al., 2012]). Although initially isolated from an environment with much lower chlorinated solvent concentrations than D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T, results from the present study demonstrate that D. alkenigignens IP3-3T can reductively dechlorinate 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA at concentrations comparable to D. lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T.
Although reports of pure cultures’ abilities to dehalogenate high concentrations of chlorinated alkanes are generally lacking in the literature, Marzorati et al. () reported an enrichment culture referred to as 6VS (originating from groundwater in Italy where there was 1,2-DCA contamination for more than 30 years) that repeatedly dechlorinated 8 mM 1,2-DCA. Also, [Grostern and Edwards (2009]) described an enrichment culture, including Dehalobacter sp. and an Acetobacterium sp., capable of dechlorinating 2 mM 1,2-DCA. Though not previously evaluated for chlorinated ethanes or propanes, previous research on chlorinated ethenes has shown that microbial populations reductively dechlorinating chlorinated aliphatic alkenes, particularly perchloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) can maintain their activity and increase contaminant dissolution rates ([Cope and Hughes, 2001]; [Dennis et al., 2003]; [Sleep et al., 2006]; [Yang and McCarty 2002]).
The toxicity of solvents to microorganisms has been previously correlated to hydrophobicity as measured by the log of octanol/water partition coefficients, log Kow ([Sikkema et al., 1995]). Compounds with log Kow in the range of 1.5 to 4 are generally toxic to microorganisms, with maximum toxicity exhibited by compounds with log Kow between 2 and 4 ([Bowman et al., 2009]; [Inoue and Horikoshi, 1991]; [Kieboom and de Bont, 2000]; [Sikkema et al., 1994]; [Sikkema et al., 1995]). The adverse effects of 1,2-DCA, 1,2-DCP, and 1,1,2-TCA on reductive dechlorination by the bacterial strains tested here are consistent with these previous observations. For equal molar concentrations, 1,1,2-TCA [log Kow 2.47, ([Alvarez and Illman, 2006])] was more inhibitory than 1,2-DCP [log Kow 2.0, ([Alvarez and Illman, 2006])] which had a larger adverse effect than 1,2-DCA [log Kow 1.48, ([Alvarez and Illman, 2006])].
The ability of Dehalogenimonas spp. to reductively dechlorinate high concentrations of halogenated alkanes has important implications for cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater. Abiotic transformation of these chemicals in the environment is generally quite slow. For example, the environmental half-life of 1,2-DCA from abiotic transformation in water was estimated to be 50 years ([Vogel et al., 1987]). Unlike chlorinated ethe nes (e.g., tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene), several of the polychlorinated etha nes and propa nes, 1,2-DCA in particular, are resistant to transformation by zero-valent iron ([Sarathy et al., 2010]; [Song and Carraway, 2005]), limiting physicochemical remediation approaches for cleanup. The fact that Dehalogenimonas spp. are able to perform reductive dechlorination even in the presence of high concentrations of chlorinated compounds suggests that they may provide an important role in bioremediation.
This research was funded by the Governor’s Biotechnology Initiative of the Louisiana Board of Regents grant BOR#015 and NPC Services, Inc.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Toxicological profile for 1,2-dichloroethane. Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA; 2001. . Accessed 11 August 2012 http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts38.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Toxicological profile for 1,1,2-trichloroethane. Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA; 1989. . Accessed 11 August 2012 http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp148.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez PJJ, Illman WA: Bioremediation and natural attenuation: Process fundamentals and mathematical models. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ; 2006.Google Scholar
- Bowman KS, Moe WM, Rash BA, Bae HS, Rainey FA: Bacterial diversity of an acidic Louisiana groundwater contaminated by dense nonaqueous-phase liquid containing chloroethanes and other solvents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006, 58: 120–133. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00146.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman KS, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Rainey FA, Moe WM: Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens sp. nov, a chlorinated alkane dehalogenating bacterium isolated from groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012. in press 10.1099/ijs.0.045054-0Google Scholar
- Bowman KS, Rainey FA, Moe WM: Production of hydrogen by Clostridium species in the presence of chlorinated solvents. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009, 290: 188–194. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01419.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Puhakka JA, Ferguson JF: Transformations of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane under methanogenic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 1996, 30: 542–547. 10.1021/es9502987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christ JA, Ramsburg CA, Abriola LM, Pennell KD, Löffler FE: Coupling aggressive mass removal with microbial reductive dechlorination for remediation of DNAPL source zones: A review and assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113: 465–477. 10.1289/ehp. 6932PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cope N, Hughes JB: Biologically-enhanced removal of PCE from NAPL source zones. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35: 2014–2021. 10.1021/es0017357View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Wildeman S, Verstraete W: The quest for microbial reductive dechlorination of C 2 to C 4 chloroalkanes is warranted. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 61: 94–102. 10.1007/s00253-002-1174-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Wildeman S, Diekert G, Van Langenhove H, Verstraete W: Stereoselective microbial dehalorespiration with vicinal dichlorinated alkanes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69: 5643–5647. 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5643-5647.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dennis PC, Sleep BE, Fulthorpe RR, Liss SN: Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial populations in an anaerobic microbial consortium capable of degrading saturation concentrations of tetrachloroethylene. Can J Microbiol 2003, 49: 15–27. 10.1139/W03-008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fennell DE, Carroll AB, Gossett JM, Zinder SH: Assessment of indigenous reductive dechlorination potential at a TCE-contaminated site using microcosms, polymerase chain reaction analyses and site data. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35: 1830–1839. 10.1021/es0016203View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R: Biodegradability of chlorinated solvents and related chlorinated aliphatic compounds. Reviews in Environ Sci & Bio/Technol 2004, 3: 185–254. 10.1007/s11157-004-4733-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher KE, Löffler FE, Richnow HH, Nijenhuis I: Stable carbon isotope fractionation of 1,2-dichloropropane during dichloroelimination by Dehalococcoides populations. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43: 6915–6919. 0.1021/es900365xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grostern A, Edwards EA: Growth of Dehalobacter and Dehalococcoides spp. during degradation of chlorinated ethanes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72: 428–436. 10.1128/AEM.72.1.428-436.2006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grostern A, Edwards EA: Characterization of a Dehalobacter coculture that dechlorinates 1,2-dichloroethane to ethene and identification of the putative reductive dehalogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 2684–2693. 10.1128/AEM.02037-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He J, Sung Y, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Ritalahti KM, Löffler FE: Isolation and characterization of Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2, a trichloroethene (TCE) - and 1,2-dichloroethene-respring anaerobe. Environ Microbiol 2005, 7: 1442–1450. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00830.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horvath AL, Gerzen FW, Maczynska Z: IUPAC-NIST solubility data series. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1999, 28: 395–626. 10.1063/1.556039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue A, Horikoshi K: Estimation of solvent-tolerance of bacteria by the solvent parameter log P. J Ferment Bioeng 1991, 71: 194–196. 10.1016/0922-338X(91)90109-TView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kieboom J, de Bont JAM: Mechanisms of organic solvent resistance in bacteria. In Bacterial stress responses. Edited by: Storz G, Hengge-Aronis R. ASM Press, Washington, DC; 2000:393–402.Google Scholar
- Lorah M, Olsen L: Natural attenuation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in a freshwater tidal wetland: Field evidence of anaerobic biodegradation. Water Resources Res 1999, 35: 3811–3827. 10.1029/1999WR900116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Löffler FE, Champine JE, Ritalahti KM, Sprague SJ, Tiedje JM: Complete reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloropropane by anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63: 2870–2875.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Löffler FE, Yan J, Ritalahti KM, Adrian L, Edwards EA, Konstantinidis KT, Müller JA, Fullerton H, Zinder SH, Spormann AM: Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligate organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria, relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel class, Dehalococcoidestes classis nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012. in press 10.1099/ijs.0.034926-0Google Scholar
- Major DW, McMaster ML, Cox EE, Edwards EA, Dworatzek SM, Hendrickson ER, Starr MG, Payne JA, Buonamici LW: Field demonstration of successful bioaugmentation to achieve dechlorination of tetrachloroethene to ethene. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36: 5106–5116. 10.1021/es0255711View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marzorati M, de Ferra F, Van Raemdonck H, Borin S, Allifranchini E, Carpani G, Serbolisca L, Verstraete W, Boon N, Daffonchio D: A novel reductive dehalogenase, identified in a contaminated groundwater enrichment culture and in Desulfitobacterium dichloroeliminans strain DCA1 is linked to dehalogenation of 1,2-dichloroethane. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73: 2990–2999. 10.1128/AEM.02748-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maymó-Gatell X, Anguish T, Zinder SH: Reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes and 1,2-dichloroethane by “ Dehalococcoides ethenogenes ” 195. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65: 3108–3113.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moe WM, Yan J, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Rainey FA: Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens gen. nov., sp. nov., a reductive dehalogenating bacterium isolated from chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009, 59: 2692–2697. 10.1099/ijs.0.011502-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarathy V, Salter AJ, Nurmi JT, Johnson GO, Johnson RL, Tratnyek PG: Degradation of 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP): Hydrolysis, elimination, and reduction by iron and zinc. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44: 787–793. 10.1021/es902595jView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sikkema J, de Bont JAM, Poolman B: Interactions of cyclic hydrocarbons with biological membranes. J Biol Chem 1994, 174: 8022–8028.Google Scholar
- Sikkema J, de Bont JAM, Poolman B: Mechanism of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol Rev 1995, 59: 201–222.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleep BE, Seepersad DJ, Mo K, Heidorn CM, Hrapovic L, Morrill PL, McMaster ML, Hood ED, Lebron C, Lollar BS, Major DW, Edwards EA: Biological enhancement of tetrachloroethene dissolution and associated microbial community changes. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40: 3623–3633. 10.1021/es051493gView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song H, Carraway ER: Reduction of chlorinated ethanes by nanosized zero-valent iron: Kinetics, pathways, and effects of reaction conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39: 6237–6245. 10.1021/es048262eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Ginkel S, Sung S, Lay JJ: Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35: 4726–4730. 10.1021/es001979rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vogel TM, Criddle CS, McCarty PL: Transformations of halogenated aliphatic compounds. Environ Sci Technol 1987, 21: 722–736. 10.1021/es00162a001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan J, Rash BA, Rainey FA, Moe WM: Isolation of novel bacteria within the Chloroflexi capable of reductive dechlorination of 1,2,3-trichloropropane. Environ Microbiol 2009, 11: 833–843. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01804.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan J, Rash BA, Rainey FA, Moe WM: Detection and quantification of Dehalogenimonas and “Dehalococcoides” populations via PCR-based protocols targeting 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 7560–7564. 10.1128/AEM.01938-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang YR, McCarty PL: Comparison between donor substrates for biologically enhanced tetrachloroethene DNAPL dissolution. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36: 3400–3404. 10.1021/es011408eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.