Enhancement of doxorubicin production in Streptomyces peucetius by genetic engineering and process optimization

Doxorubicin is an important class of anthracycline antitumor antibiotics produced by Streptomyces peucetius. The doxorubicin fermentation yield of the wild-type strain was very low, so it could not be produced directly by fermentation at an industrial scale due to the high cost. In the present study, S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 was obtained from SIPI-14 through several rounds of doxorubicin resistance screening. Then, the ketoreductase gene dnrU was knocked out to reduce (13S)-13-dihydrodaunorubicin production, and the resistance gene drrC was overexpressed to further enhance resistance to doxorubicin. The resulting engineered strain S. peucetius △U1/drrC produced 1128 mg/L doxorubicin, a 102.1% increase compared to that of SIPI-14. Then, fermentation medium was optimized using the response surface method. In the optimized fermentation medium, the yield of doxorubicin was increased to 1406 mg/L in shake flask on the 7th day. Furthermore, batch culture was carried out in a 10 L fermenter, and the concentration of doxorubicin reached 1461 mg/L after 7 days of culture, which was the highest yield reported to date, indicating the potential for industrial production of doxorubicin by fermentation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13568-024-01699-z.


Introduction
Doxorubicin is an anthracycline antibiotic, and its analogs include daunorubicin, epirubicin and idarubicin.As a chemical drug, doxorubicin has a broad array of anticancer activities and is used to treat various cancers, especially hemangioma and solid tumors (Mattioli et al. 2023).For most cancers, doxorubicin remains a firstline chemotherapy agent, either alone or in combination Hutchinson and Colombo 1999).The synthesis of ɛ-rhodomycinone is the first pathway involved.Under the action of a type II polyketide synthase (PKS) encoded by the dpsABCDGEFY genes, 12-deoxyacranic acid is synthesized by a multistep reaction with propionyl CoA as the starting unit and malonyl CoA as the extension unit.Then, the ɛ-rhodomycinone aglycone is produced by oxygenase, methyltransferase, cyclization and reductase.The second synthesis pathway of doxorubicin is that of TDP-L-daunosamine.Through a six-step reaction, D-glucose-1-phosphate from the central metabolic pathway is synthesized to produce TDP-L-daunosamine, which involves a cluster of dnm genes, including dnmL, dnmM, dnmU, dnmT, dnmJ, and dnmV.Finally, glycosylation and postmodification of daunorubicin and doxorubicin occur.Rhodomycin-D is produced by ɛ-rhodomycinone and TDP-L-daurosamine through the action of glycosyltransferase.After postmodification (demethylation, decarboxylation and hydroxylation), daunorubicin and doxorubicin are obtained.In the branch pathway, daunorubicin is converted to 13(S)-13-dihydrodaunorubicin via catalysis by the enzyme encoded by the dnrU gene.Moreover, daunorubicin and doxorubicin are converted into acid-sensitive baumycin by the enzymes encoded by the genes dnrH and dnrX, as shown in Additional file: Fig. S1.
In S. peucetitus ATCC 27,952, the yield of doxorubicin is low, making its large-scale production difficult and high-cost.To address this problem, several efforts have been made to increase the production of doxorubicin by genetic engineering.Based on the biosynthetic pathway of doxorubicin, its production may be limited by several key enzymes, such as glycosylated genes and a P450 enzyme DoxA.Therefore, they were engineered to increase the fermentation yield of doxorubicin.The overexpression of glycosylated genes has been utilized to increase the fermentation yield of doxorubicin.Malla (Malla et al. 2009) achieved a 5.6-fold increase in doxorubicin production (approximately 10 mg/L) by simultaneously overexpressing the gene glycosyltransferase dnrS/ dnrQ and the sugar synthesis pathway gene desIII/desIV.Recently, Zhang (Zhang et al. 2023a) obtained a DoxA mutant, DoxA(P88Y), showed a 56% increase in the conversion efficiency of daunorubicin to doxorubicin.These results indicated that some enzymes are limiting factors in the biosynthetic pathway and their engineering is an important approach to improve doxorubicin production.In addition, it was reported that the synthesis of the secondary metabolite doxorubicin is tightly regulated.The fermentation yield of doxorubicin was increased by disrupting negative regulatory genes and overexpressing positive regulatory genes.Noh (Noh et al. 2010)enhanced the doxorubicin fermentation yield by approximately 35% (approximately 75 mg/L) by disrupting the downregulation of the gene wblA.In addition, the expression of the AfsR homologous regulatory gene (AfsR-p) in S. peucetius ATCC27952 led to a 4-fold increase in doxorubicin production (approximately 80 mg/L) (Parajuli et al. 2005).ParK (Park et al. 2005) increased the fermentation yield of doxorubicin by 30.8-fold (approximately 11 mg/L) through the overexpression of the regulatory gene dnrI in a high-copy-number plasmid combined with the optimization of the medium.Moreover, Malla (Malla et al. 2010a) increased the fermentation yield of doxorubicin by 4.3 times (approximately 7 mg/L) by simultaneously overexpressing the regulatory gene dnrN-dnrI-afsR.However, in all these studies, improving the yield of doxorubicin were focused on wild-type strains with low doxorubicin yields.Therefore, genetic modification of high-yielding strains is important for industrial application.
In our previous study, we generated a S. peucetius SIPI-14 strain with significantly improved doxorubicin levels by combining the traditional method of UV and ARTP mutagenesis (Wang et al. 2018).In the present study, a strain with doxorubicin resistance was obtained from SIPI-14 for further genetic modification combined with fermentation medium optimization to significantly improve the yield of doxorubicin, which laid a foundation for the large-scale industrial production of doxorubicin by direct fermentation in the future.

Strains, plasmids and primers
The strains and plasmids used in this research are listed in Table 1, and the primers used are listed in Additional file: Table S1.

Culture of S. Peucetius in a 10 L fermenter
The 1.0 cm × 1.5 cm mycelia of the engineered S. peucetius △U1/drrC were picked and cultured in a seed medium at 28 ℃ for 42-48 h at 200 rpm.5% seed cultures were transferred to a 10 L bioreactor containing 6 L of fermentation medium.The incubation temperature, initial pH and aeration conditions were 28 ℃, 6.2 and 0.03-0.06vvm (air volume/culture volume/min), respectively.The dissolved oxygen was automatically associated with agitation, which was controlled at 30-35% during fermentation.The yield of doxorubicin was measured at regular intervals for 8 days.

Screening of S. peucetius with doxorubicin resistance
The S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 cultured on the plate were inoculated into a seed medium containing 50 mg/L doxorubicin at 28 ℃ and 220 rpm for 2 days.The seed culture mixture was continuously transferred to fresh seed medium 2 times, diluted on a solid plate to obtain single colonies, and cultured for doxorubicin production in shake flasks.The strain with the highest yield of doxorubicin was selected for the next round of screening.The concentration of doxorubicin in the seed medium was gradually increased from 50 mg/L to 100 mg/L and 150 mg/L to obtain doxorubicin-resistant strains.

Strain construction
The knockout strains △U1, △H4 and △X1 were derived from SIPI-7-14 with the deletion of a 351 bp, 783 bp and 1221 bp fragment on the gene dnrU, dnrH and dnrX, respectively.The constructed △U1 knockout mutant strain was used as an example.The S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 genome was used as a template to obtain the 1121 bp upstream and 1450 bp downstream homology arms of dnrU by PCR amplification with the primers dnrU-UP-F/R and dnrU-DOWN-F/R.The upstream and downstream homology arms were fused together by overlapping PCR with the primers dnrU-UP-F/dnrU-DOWN-R.The PCR product was digested with HindIII/XbaI and then assembled on the pSET vector to construct the plasmid pSET-△dnrU (Additional file: Fig. S2a), which was used to delete the dnrU gene.The wellestablished plasmid was subsequently transformed into S17-1, which was subsequently conjugated with strain SIPI-7-14.The colonies that were apramycin resistant were regarded as the integrating mutants, in which the first homologous single-crossover occurred.The resulting mutants were then subcultured six times in TSB medium without the antibiotic apramycin and diluted to spread on SP plates.The colonies that were phenotypically sensitive to apramycin were selected.The primers ΔdnrU F/R were used for colony PCR verification.The PCR products were subsequently sequenced by GENEWIZ for verification, and all primers were synthesized by Jie Li Biology (Li et al. 2022).The mutant strains ΔH4 and ΔX1 were constructed using the same method as that used to construct ΔU1.Among them, the two homology arms of the mutant strains △H4 and △X1 were obtained from the SIPI-7-14 genome using the primer pairs dnrH-up-F/R and dnrH-down-F/R and dnrX-up-F/R and dnrX-down-F/R, respectively.The constructed plasmids pSET-△dnrH and pSET-△dnrX were shown in Additional file: Fig. S2b and Fig. S2c.The final verification PCR primers used were ΔdnrH F/R and ΔdnrX F/R.The PCR products of the △dnrH and △dnrX genes were validated by further Sanger sequencing.
To overexpress the drrC gene, the drrC gene fragment was first obtained from the S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 genome by PCR using the primers drrC F/R.The plasmid pSET152 was subsequently digested with NdeI and ligated to the PCR product to construct the integrated plasmid pSET152-drrC (Additional file: Fig. S2d).The correctly sequenced plasmid was introduced into S17-1 competent cells.The drrC gene was subsequently integrated into S. peucetius △U1 by conjugative transfer.The plasmids pSET152-drrAB (Additional file: Fig. S2e) and pSET152-drrD (Additional file: Fig. S2f ) were constructed in the same way.The drrAB and drrD genes were obtained by PCR amplification using the primers drrAB F/R and drrD F/R, respectively.The target gene drrAB was amplified from the S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 genome using the primers drrAB F (TY)/R.The plasmid pSET152-drrC was subsequently digested with speI and ligated to the PCR product to construct the integrated plasmid pSET152-drrABC (Additional file: Fig. S2g).The genetically engineered strains containing the overexpressed genes were cultured in shake flasks, and the yield of doxorubicin was analyzed using HPLC.Genes with accession numbers were as follow: drrA (Accession number: PP049447), drrB (Accession number: PP049448), drrC (Accession number: L76359) and drrD (Accession number: PP049449).

Optimization of fermentation medium by RSM
The fermentation medium was optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) using the statistical design software Box-Behnken design (BBD), version 8.06.Three factors, (A) maltodextrin, (B) dry yeast powder, and (C) calcium chloride, were used, and all the variables consisted of three levels (-1, 0, and 1), representing minimum, intermediate, and maximum values, respectively (as shown in Additional file: Table S2).The seeds were cultured for 40-46 h.The engineered strain △U1/drrC was selected for fermentation in shake flasks.10% of the seeds cultured for 40-46 h were transferred to fermentation media for 6 days.Each experiment was repeated in three parallel shake flasks.The fermentation yield of doxorubicin was measured by HPLC.

Analysis of cell growth and doxorubicin production
For biomass determination, 4 mL of fermentation broth was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min.Biomass (%) = [(F − S)/F] × 100%, where F represents the volume of fermentation broth and S represents the volume of supernatant.
The fermentation broth was adjusted to pH 1.5-1.8 with 6 mol/L HCl, and 0.1 mL of the fermentation broth was subsequently added to 0.9 mL of ethanol, mixed and sonicated for 30 min at 4 Hz.After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane, after which the samples were detected via Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).The chromatographic column used was an Agilent SB-18 (3.5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm), the mobile phase was used at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, the detection wavelength was 254 nm, and the column temperature was 30 ℃.The mobile phase was composed of buffer: acetonitrile: methanol = 500:500:60, where the buffer contained 0.68 mL of phosphoric acid and 1.44 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate in 500 mL of purified water.

Analysis of transcriptional levels by quantitative real-time PCR
For the control strain S. peucetius ΔU1 and the overexpression strain ΔU1/drrC, 20 mL of fermentation broth was collected on the 4th and 6th days, respectively, and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the cells.Total RNA was extracted according to the experimental manual provided with the Ultrapure RNA Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China).Before reverse transcription of the RNA into cDNA, residual DNA in the RNA samples was removed using RNase-free DNase I (Takara, Dalian, China).Reverse transcription was performed using the Kit PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the method provided by the kit manufacturer.The obtained cDNA was used as a template for qPCR, and the transcription level of the drrC gene was determined with the 16S rRNA gene as the reference gene.The primers used for qPCR amplification of the drrC gene and 16S rRNA gene were QdrrC F/R and 16 S RNA F/R, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1).The qPCR amplification conditions included 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s; and a final step of 95 °C for 15 s.Changes in the fold change in gene expression levels were quantified using the 2 − ρρCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).Each qRT-PCR experiment was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis
Each experiment in this study had been replicated three times, with the error bars showing the standard deviations.Statistical analyses involving comparison between the test data and the control date were performed with t-student test (P < 0.001) and one-way ANOVA by using GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 software and Origin Version 8.5 software.

Doxorubicin resistance screening
S. peucetius SIPI-14, which has significantly increased doxorubicin levels, was generated by traditional mutagenesis in our study (Wang et al. 2018).Due to its strong cytotoxicity, doxorubicin has a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of S. peucetius strains themselves.In this study, doxorubicin was added to the seed medium to obtain strains with greater doxorubicin resistance through continuous resistance pressure screening.Initially, 50 mg/L doxorubicin was added to the liquid medium.After continuous cultivation, the concentration of doxorubicin in the seed medium was gradually increased from 50 mg/L to 150 mg/L to screen for high-yielding strains that could grow in a resistant environment (Fig. 1a).Through continuous doxorubicin resistance screening, the biomass of the strains gradually increased from 12.5 to 14.8%, and the ability to produce doxorubicin was significantly enhanced.The high-yielding strain SIPI-7-14 was selected from seed medium containing 150 mg/L doxorubicin.The yield of doxorubicin reached 847 mg/L, which was 51.7% greater than that of SIPI-14 (Fig. 1b).

Construction of the dnrU, dnrH and dnrX gene knockout strains
Through sequential doxorubicin resistance screening, it is difficult to further improve the yield of doxorubicin.Therefore, genetic engineering was selected for strain modification.After producing daunorubicin and doxorubicin, the strains could also produce byproducts.According to the branch biosynthetic pathway of doxorubicin shown in Additional file: Fig. S1, the dnrU gene in the branch metabolic pathway encodes a ketoreductase that catalyzes the reduction of the intermediate daunorubicin at position C-13 to form 13-dihydrodaunorubicin. The genes dnrH and dnrX encode enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of baumycin-like glycosides from daunorubicin and doxorubicin.In this study, homologous double-crossover recombination was used to knock out the 351 bp fragment of dnrU (Fig. 2a) to obtain the ΔU1 mutant.The parent strain SIPI-7-14 and the ΔU1 mutant Fig. 1 Improvement of doxorubicin yield by resistance screening a Fifty milligrams/L doxorubicin was added to the seed medium for 2 days of culture, after which 10% of the inoculum was transferred to fresh seed medium 2 times.The seed culture mixture was diluted and spread onto a plate, and single colonies were selected for shake flask fermentation.The strain with the highest yield was selected for the next round of screening.b Doxorubicinproducing S. peucetius were screened under different conditions and verified by shake flask culture: (1) natural selection, (2) seed solution with 50 mg/L doxorubicin, (3) seed solution with 100 mg/L doxorubicin, and (4) seed solution with 150 mg/L doxorubicin.The error bars are the standard deviations of three replicates were confirmed by PCR (Fig. 2b).△H4 and △X1 were obtained using the same method by deleting dnrH and dnrX (Fig. 2d and e), respectively.The biomass of the engineered strain △U1 decreased slightly compared to that of the parental strain SIPI-7-14, from 15 to 14%.However, the yield of doxorubicin produced by the engineered strain △U1 was 1005 mg/L, which was 21.5% greater than that produced by the parental strain.However, when the branch pathway genes dnrH and dnrX were knocked out, the yield of doxorubicin in the knockout strains △H4 and △X1 decreased (Fig. 2c).

Overexpression of the resistance genes drrC, drrAB, drrD or drrABC increases doxorubicin production
Antibiotic-producing actinomycetes maintain self-resistance through the presence of resistance genes.In contrast to the ATP-dependent efflux pump mechanism composed of drrA and drrB (Kaur 1997;Li et al. 2014), the drrC gene encodes a UvrA-like protein that binds to DNA and can remove daunorubicin from the insertion site, thus enabling actinomycetes to tolerate their own products (Lomovskaya et al. 1996;Prija and Prasad 2017).The integrated plasmid pSET152 was used to overexpress The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △U1 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △U1 (351 bp in the knockout gene dnrU in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).c Comparison of doxorubicin production and biomass by the SIPI-7-14 strain and the engineered strains △U1, △H4 and △X1 in shake flasks after 6 days of fermentation.The error bars indicate the standard deviations.d The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △H4 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △H4 (783 bp in the knockout gene dnrH in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).e The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △X1 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △X1 (1221 bp in the knockout gene dnrX in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).f The engineered strains △U1/drrC, △U1/drrAB, △U1/drrABC and △U1/drrD were generated by overexpressing the resistance genes drrC, drrAB, drrABC and drrD in the parental strain △U1, respectively, and were subsequently verified by fermentation in shake flasks to determine their doxorubicin production and biomass.Three parallel shakers were performed for each strain.g The transcription levels of the drrC gene were compared between △U1/drrC and △U1 by using shake flask fermentation broth collected on the 4th and 6th days.The error bars indicate the standard deviations the drrC, drrAB and drrD genes in the strain △U1 to obtain the engineered strains △U1/drrC, △U1/drrAB and △U1/drrD, respectively.The engineered strains were verified by shake flask fermentation.The doxorubicin yield of the engineered strain △U1/drrC was 13.2% greater than that of the parental strain △U1, reaching 1128 mg/L (Fig. 2f ).The engineered strain △U1/drrAB produced 1098 mg/L doxorubicin.However, the engineered strain △U1/drrD produced 1010 mg/L doxorubicin in a shake flask, which was almost the same as that of the parental strain.Furthermore, the drrAB and drrC genes were overexpressed in the △U1 strain to obtain the engineered strain △U1/drrABC.However, the combined overexpression of the drrAB and drrC genes resulted in a lower fermentation yield than the single expression of drrC.In conclusion, the engineered strain △U1/drrC produced the highest fermentation yield in shake flasks.The transcription levels of the drrC gene in the engineered strain △U1/drrC and the parental strain △U1 were subsequently analyzed.The transcription level of drrC in △U1 decreased significantly during the culture process.The transcription level of drrC in the strain △U1/drrC was significantly greater than that in the △U1 strain (Fig. 2g).A high level of drrC expression increases the tolerance of the strain to high concentrations of doxorubicin, resulting in maintenance of the biomass and the production of additional products.

Fermentation medium optimization by RSM
In our previous studies, Wang (Wang et al. 2018) found that maltodextrin and dry yeast powder had a positive effect on doxorubicin by using single-factor experiments.In addition to maltodextrin and dry yeast powder, we also found that calcium salts affect the synthesis of doxorubicin.The effects of four different calcium sources, calcium pantothenate, Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , CaSO 4 and CaCl 2 , on the yield of doxorubicin fermentation were studied, and CaCl 2 was shown to improve the production of doxorubicin (Fig. 3g).Therefore, S. peucetius △U1/drrC cultured in fermentation media supplemented with different concentrations of CaCl 2 were investigated in shake flasks.When the concentration of CaCl 2 was 0.6%, the yield of doxorubicin increased by 11.3%, reaching 1228 mg/L (Fig. 3h).The components containing maltodextrin, yeast powder and calcium chloride were further optimized by the response surface method.
For the response surface optimization experiment, a total of 17 formulations were designed (as shown in Additional file: Table S3), each with three parallel shake flasks.The center points were the same for 5 points and different for the remaining 12 points.Doxorubicin yields ranging from 921 to 1333 mg/L were observed in 17 experiments with three factors and three levels (Additional file: Table S3).The response of doxorubicin content was expressed by a second-order polynomial equation, which was obtained by multiple regression analysis (R 2 = 0.9548 and p < 0.0006): Here, Y represents the doxorubicin yield.A, B and C represent maltodextrin, dry yeast powder and CaCl 2 , respectively.ANOVA was used in the response surface model to verify the reliability of the statistical model and the statistical significance of the parameters, as described in Additional file: Table S4.The p value of the secondorder PRS model is 0.0006, indicating that this model is significant.In addition, lack of fit was used to evaluate model reliability, and a nonsignificant lack of fit was satisfactory.In this model, the lack of fit F value is 0.69, which is insignificant relative to the pure error, indicating that the model is suitable.The predicted R 2 is predicted by the response surface model.The difference between the adjusted R 2 and the predicted R 2 was within 0.2, indicating that the model was valid.In this way, Pred R 2 = 0.7063 and Adj R 2 = 0.8966 are in line with the requirements, indicating that the experimental results are reliable.
The 3D response surface plots and the 2D contour plots represent the prediction equations in Fig. 3a-f.The best predictive values were 130 g/L maltodextrin, 39 g/L dry yeast powder and 5 g/L calcium chloride.
The optimal fermentation parameters were predicted to be 130 g/L maltodextrin, 39 g/L dry yeast powder, 5 g/L CaCl 2 , 2 g/L NaCl, and 3 g/L CaCO 3 .△U1/drrC was cultured in the original formulation or the optimized formulation in shake flasks to compare the differences in doxorubicin yield, biomass and pH (Fig. 4a-c).
There was no significant difference in the fermentation yield of △U1/drrC between the optimized formula and the original formula during the five days of shaking flask fermentation.However, with the optimized formula, △U1/drrC produced more products after the 6th day, and the highest yield of doxorubicin was 1406 mg/L on the 7th day (Fig. 4c).On the 6th day, the yield of doxorubicin reached 1340 mg/L (Fig. 4c), which was very close to the model-predicted value of 1323 mg/L, indicating that the prediction model was effective.The optimized formulation was more suitable for the growth of △U1/drrC; Thus, having more biomass resulted in a greater doxorubicin yield (Fig. 4b).In addition, the pH of the optimized formulation was maintained between 6.4 and 6.6, which was lower than that of the original formulation, indicating that the strain underwent a slower aging reaction in the new medium than in the other media, thereby increasing the fermentation period (Fig. 4a).

Batch culture of △U1/drrC in 10 L fermenter for doxorubicin production
To further expand the scale of cultivation, fermentation was carried out in a 10 L fermenter using the original and optimized media with S. peucetius △U1/drrC (Fig. 4d and e).In the original formulation, the agitation increased rapidly during the first three days, at which point the strain grew rapidly.The biomass of the strain reached a maximum of 15% on the 4th day.The titer of doxorubicin reached 1158 mg/L on the 5th day of fermentation.During fermentation, the trend of the change in pH first increased, then decreased, and finally increased again.The fermentation period was short, and the biomass decreased rapidly (Fig. 4d).With the optimized formula, the growth rate increased rapidly in the first two days, the strains grew rapidly, and the biomass was slightly greater than that of the original formulation, reaching 15.5%;However, the biomass was maintained for a longer time.The trend of the pH change in the optimized formulation was consistent with that in the original formulation, but the pH was maintained at approximately 6.4 during the later period, which was lower than that of the original formulation.The duration of doxorubicin production in the optimized formulation was longer, probably because the biomass in the optimized formulation was maintained for a longer time, and a lower pH was more favorable for strain production.The yield of doxorubicin reached a maximum of 1461 mg/L on the 7th day (Fig. 4e), which was slightly greater than the yield of the shaker culture.

Discussion
Secondary metabolites are generally toxic to their producers.The cytotoxicity of doxorubicin can inhibit the growth of S. peucetius and hinder product production.In our study, S. peucetius was continuously cultivated in seed medium containing doxorubicin, which made the strains more tolerant to the toxicity of their own products.By adaptive evolution, the resulted S. peucetius SIPI-7-14 showed higher biomass and doxorubicin yield than that of S. peucetius SIPI-14.The high-yielding strains can be used as better cell factories for doxorubicin production.To further increase the product tolerance, overexpression of resistance genes is another widely applied approach.Cellular resistance in S. peucetius is mediated by genes, including drrA, drrB, drrC and drrD (Karuppasamy et al. 2015).An efflux pump composed of the proteins drrA and drrB removes doxorubicin from cells (Kaur 1997).Like UvrA, the protein drrC may recognize and eliminate daunorubicin, which is embedded in DNA, thus allowing DNA replication and transcription to continue (Prija and Prasad 2017).Expression of drrC in the Escherichia coli uvrA strain can significantly increase the daunorubicin resistance of the strain (Lomovskaya et al. 1996).Directly downstream of drrA and drrB lies drrD, which is involved in self-resistance as well.S. peucetius drrD deletion mutant showed reduced self-resistance, but the molecular mechanism has not yet been known (Karuppasamy et al. 2015).In our study, overexpression of drrA and drrB resulted in an increase in the production of doxorubicin.In addition, overexpression of the resistance gene drrC produced 1128 mg/L doxorubicin, a 102.1% increase compared to that of SIPI-14.However, the combination of the genes drrA, drrB and drrC did not result in a greater yield than did the overexpression of drrC alone.This phenomenon is consistent with the findings of previous reports in the literature, in which the expression of both resistance systems was shown to be worse than the expression of an individual resistance system (Malla et al. 2010b).We have also tried to Secondary metabolites can generally be enhanced by deleting genes of competing pathways.In the pathway of doxorubicin biosynthesis, the dnrU coding product can catalyze daunorubicin to produce byproducts, while the dnrH and dnrX coding products can use daunorubicin and doxorubicin to produce baumycin analogs.It was reported that in S. peucetius 29,050, blocking the dnrU and dnrX increased the yield of doxorubicin by three times, compared with that of the parent strain.Inactivation of dnrH led to an 8.5-fold increase in daunorubicin production and doxorubicin production also increased (Lomovskaya et al. 1998(Lomovskaya et al. , 1999;;Scotti and Hutchinson 1996).In this study, gene dnrU was disrupted in the S. peucetiuss SIPI-7-14 and the yield of doxorubicin was 21.5% greater than that of the parent strain.However, the higher fold enhancement reported in the literature may be due to the low yield of the original strain.Surprisingly, after deletion of the branch genes dnrH and dnrX, the yield of doxorubicin decreased instead, which is inconsistent with the findings of previous reports.The biomass of the engineered strain △H4 and △X1 decreased compared to that of the parental strain SIPI-7-14, from 15 to 11% and 12%, respectively.We speculated that the toxicity of doxorubicin is higher than the glycosylated product baumycin, which has a great effect on the growth of S. peucetius.The baumycin is sensitive to acid and can be easily converted into doxorubicin by adjusting the pH to 1.5-1.8,so it will not affect the doxorubicin yield.These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the results of genetic engineering modification between high-yielding strain and wild-type strain.
As the genetic background of strains changed after genetic engineering, it is necessary to optimize the medium or culture conditions to explore the production potential of engineered strains.This phenomenon has also been found in other strains (Li et al. 2022;Wan et al. 2023;Zhang et al. 2023b).RSM was widely used to design experiments and determine the optimal medium with fewer experimental trials and obtain more responses at the same time.The medium obtained through RSM method was better than previously reported single-factor optimization.The production of doxorubicin reached 1406 mg/L in the shake flask on the 7th day, which was 24.6% higher than before.
In conclusion, the yield of doxorubicin can be effectively improved by combination of resistance screening, genetic engineering and optimization of culture media, a 150.6% increase compared with the parent strain SIPI-14, which was the highest reported so far (Table 2).This will make it possible to produce doxorubicin through one-step fermentation instead of existing chemical semisynthetic production method.Meanwhile, some other products derived from actinomyces fermentation can also use this strategy to improve the fermentation yield.(Lomovskaya et al. 1998)

Fig. 2
Fig.2Inactivation of competing pathway genes and overexpression of the resistance genes a Schematic representation of the disruption of the target gene dnrU in S. peucetius.b The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △U1 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △U1 (351 bp in the knockout gene dnrU in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).c Comparison of doxorubicin production and biomass by the SIPI-7-14 strain and the engineered strains △U1, △H4 and △X1 in shake flasks after 6 days of fermentation.The error bars indicate the standard deviations.d The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △H4 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △H4 (783 bp in the knockout gene dnrH in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).e The parental strain SIPI-7-14 and the engineered strain △X1 were verified by PCR.M: marker, 1: control (SIPI-7-14), 2: the engineered strain △X1 (1221 bp in the knockout gene dnrX in the genome of strain SIPI-7-14).f The engineered strains △U1/drrC, △U1/drrAB, △U1/drrABC and △U1/drrD were generated by overexpressing the resistance genes drrC, drrAB, drrABC and drrD in the parental strain △U1, respectively, and were subsequently verified by fermentation in shake flasks to determine their doxorubicin production and biomass.Three parallel shakers were performed for each strain.g The transcription levels of the drrC gene were compared between △U1/drrC and △U1 by using shake flask fermentation broth collected on the 4th and 6th days.The error bars indicate the standard deviations

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Optimization of fermentation medium optimization by RSM.a, b Effects of dry yeast power and maltodextrin on the doxorubicin yield.c, d Effects of dry yeast power and calcium chloride on the doxorubicin yield.e, f Effects of calcium chloride and maltodextrin on the doxorubicin yield.g Effect of different calcium sources on doxorubicin production.h Effect of the calcium chloride concentration on doxorubicin production

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Comparison of the fermentation process of △U1/drrC in shake flasks and 10-L fermenter.a Changes in pH, b changes in biomass, and c production of doxorubicin in the original formulation and in the optimized formulation in shake flasks, respectively.The fermentation process of △U1/drrC d in the original formulation and e in the optimized formulation in a 10-L fermenter

Table 2
Comparison of strategies and yields of doxorubicin-producing strains