Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of linear regression parameters for PCR Ct values obtained from different DNA preparation methods

From: Rapid preparation of Candida genomic DNA: combined use of enzymatic digestion and thermal disruption

Species

Slopes (95% CI)a

Significanceb (P value)

y-Intercepts (95% CI)a

Significanceb (P value)

Conventional

Rapid

Conventional

Rapid

Candida albicans

− 3.125 (− 3.601 to − 2.648)

− 3.287 (− 3.414 to -3.16)

0.3875

37.59 (36.15 to 39.04)

32.65 (32.26 to 33.03)

 < 0.0001*

Candida tropicalis

− 2.604 (− 3.076 to − 2.132)

− 2.806 (− 3.362 to − 2.25)

0.4641

36.01 (34.58 to 37.44)

30.43 (28.75 to 32.11)

 < 0.0001*

Candida glabrata

− 2.860 (− 3.519 to − 2.202)

− 3.119 (− 3.38 to − 2.859)

0.3391

37.05 (35.06 to 39.04)

34.35 (33.56 to 35.14)

 < 0.0001*

Candida parapsilosis

− 2.968 (− 3.44 to − 2.497)

− 2.973 (− 3.268 to − 2.677)

0.9835

37.89 (36.46 to 39.32)

32.37 (31.48 to 33.27)

 < 0.0001*

Candida krusei

− 3.643 (− 4.033 to − 3.252)

− 3.355 (− 3.518 to − 3.192)

0.0961

38.35 (37.17 to 39.53)

32.39 (31.9 to 32.88)

 < 0.0001*

  1. aThe comparison was performed between two different DNA preparation methods, “conventional” here represents the conventional DNA preparation method, and “rapid” represents the rapid DNA preparation method we established
  2. bP values were calculated by default statistical method of the software GraphPad Prism 7.00
  3. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05)