Skip to main content

Table 2 Some physicochemical parameters of the examined fish water ponds before and after application of probiotic

From: Influence of probiotics on water quality in intensified Litopenaeus vannamei ponds under minimum-water exchange

Treatments

Control ponds (T1)

Single spp. probiotic (T2)

Multi spp. probiotic (T3)

Permissible limits according to

Application to the pond

Before stocking

After stocking

Before stocking

After stocking

Before stocking

After stocking

Total Vibrio count (log CFU mL−1)*

3.764b ± 0.129

3.63b ± 0.137

4.408a ± 0.173

1.263c ± 0.193

4.055ab ± 0.213

0.856c ± 0.188

  

Temperature (ºC)*

29.019a ± 0.123

29.271a ± 0.229

28.621a ± 0.182

29.068a ± 0.1

28.734a ± 0.13

29.068a ± 0.095

24–30

(Clifford 1997; Lucas and Southgate 2012)

Dissolved oxygen (m gL−1)

4.127d ± 0.078

4.782c ± 0.102

4.141d ± 0.077

5.965b ± 0.431

4.603 cd ± 0.017

6.541a ± 0.294

> 4

Lucas and Southgate (2012)

pH

7.614b ± 0.059

7.554bc ± 0.071

7.903a ± 0.026

6.995d ± 0.08

7.917a ± 0.017

7.314c ± 0.056

6.5–9.5

Carbajal-Hernández et al. (2012)

Salinity (g L−1)

35.355ab ± 1.499

37.590a ± 1.452

31.690ab ± 0302

34.0ab ± 0.533

30.483b ± 0.128

32.136ab ± 0.519

15–45

(Clifford 1997; Lucas and Southgate 2012)

Organic matter (m gL−1)

15.479b ± 0.216

16.298ab ± 0.194

16.103b ± 0.229

12.75c ± 0.665

16.828a ± 0.141

15.636b ± 0.626

 

NH3 (m gL−1)

0.049a ± 0.003

0.026b ± 0.001

0.050a ± 0.004

0.006c ± 0.001

0.030b ± 0.002

0.005c ± 0.0001

0.01–0.09

Boyd and Zimmermann (2000)

  1. The means with different superscript letters within the same row for each parameter are significantly different at *P ≤ 0.01 and at P ≤ 0.05