Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | AMB Express

Fig. 3

From: A new device-mediated miniprep method

Fig. 3

DM minipreps plasmids are purer compared to SM plasmids. A Comparison of DM and SM minipreps plasmid conformational states. DM, SM miniprep plasmids were eluted in 50 µl of elution buffer. 1 µl of the eluted high and 5 µl low copy number plasmid were loaded in the well in a 15 µl total volume. Plasmids were subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel. Migration of CCC, OC and linear (L) forms of plasmid DNA is indicated by the green abbreviation in the corresponding band. The red pictogram shows the migration of catenated forms of pEGFP. The presence of host genomic DNA in SM-isolated pBR322 is depicted by an asterisk. B Comparison of the DNA stability of DM and SM miniprep plasmids after one year of storage at + 4°. DNA sample loading and legend are the same as shown in A. C Comparison of pEGFP of DM (D) and SM (S) minipreps plasmid quality and capability of cleavage by restriction endonuclease in comparison to ZymoPURE-EndoZero Midiprep (Endo) and QIAGEN Midi Kits (Midi) isolated plasmid. 1 µl of pEGFP by SM and DM miniprtepped samples were digested with 1 µl of XhoI at 37 °C for 1 h in 15 µl of the recommended buffer. The plasmid digestion products were loaded into wells and separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel. The 1 kb plus DNA ladder was electrophoresed as a DNA size marker. dCCCDNA is indicated by the arrowhead and is resistant to restriction enzyme digestion

Back to article page