AMB Express

Table 6 Relative abundance of intestinal microbiota with administration of EC12, SCE, and mixture of EC12 and SCE in weaning pigs without ETEC infection

From: Effects of organic acid, Enterococcus faecalis strain EC-12 and sugar cane extract in feed against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced diarrhea in pigs

Family	Treatment^a
Family	CO	EC	SC	MI	SEM
Jejunum
Enterobacteriaceae	71.25	8.75^*	13.50^*	15.00^*	6.67
Pasteurellaceae	22.25	22.25	21.75	13.90	4.70
Clostridiaceae	0.18	36.33^*	1.15	0.05^*	4.83
Lactobacillaceae	0.03	5.37^*	6.81^*	2.32	0.92
Weeksellaceae	0.00	0.55	15.06^*	0.01	2.00
Ileum
Enterobacteriaceae	51.75	6.75^*	34.25^*	4.00^*	5.12
Pasteurellaceae	40.75	65.00^*	43.75	54.25^*	2.89
Lachnospiraceae	0.01	0.18	1.50^*	3.25^*	0.35
Clostridiaceae	0.31	6.15^*	0.43	2.00	0.74
Lactobacillaceae	0.04	3.34^*	0.22	0.24	0.42
Cecum
Prevotellaceae	17.75	18.75	17.25	17.75	1.20
Ruminococcaceae	15.25	15.25	17.75	16.00	0.95
Lachnospiraceae	11.25	11.25	13.00	13.75	0.84
Lactobacillaceae	11.25	9.00	7.00	10.75	1.94
Paraprevotellaceae	10.50	8.75	9.75	9.75	1.35

^aCO (Control); basal diet only, EC; with EC12 (0.1 %, w /w),SC; with SCE (1.0 %, w /w), MI (Mix); with EC12 (0.005 %, w /w) and SCE (0.25 %, w /w). Data are presented as mean of relative abundance (%)
*Means within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05 vs. CO group)

Back to article page