Skip to main content

Table 1 Randomized central composite design of response surface methodology for evaluating interactions between some important factors influencing enzyme(s) production from A. niger APS under surface fermentation

From: Cocktail of carbohydrases from Aspergillus niger: an economical and eco-friendly option for biofilm clearance from biopolymer surfaces

Run

Block

CSL % (A)

CaSO4% (B)

MgSO4% (C)

Tween 80% (D)

1

Block 1

− 1

− 1

+ 1

− 1

2

Block 1

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

+ 1

3

Block 1

− 1

+ 1

− 1

− 1

4

Block 1

0

0

0

0

5

Block 1

+ 1

− 1

− 1

− 1

6

Block 1

0

0

0

0

7

Block 1

− 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

8

Block 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

9

Block 1

− 1

− 1

− 1

+ 1

10

Block 1

+ 1

− 1

+ 1

+ 1

11

Block 2

− 1

− 1

+ 1

+ 1

12

Block 2

+ 1

− 1

+ 1

− 1

13

Block 2

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

− 1

14

Block 2

0

0

0

0

15

Block 2

− 1

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

16

Block 2

− 1

− 1

− 1

− 1

17

Block 2

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

18

Block 2

− 1

+ 1

− 1

+ 1

19

Block 2

0

0

0

0

20

Block 2

+ 1

− 1

− 1

+ 1

21

Block 3

0

0

0

0

22

Block 3

0

0

0

− 2

23

Block 3

0

0

+ 2

0

24

Block 3

0

0

− 2

0

25

Block 3

0

0

0

0

26

Block 3

0

+ 2

0

0

27

Block 3

+ 2

0

0

0

28

Block 3

0

0

0

+ 2

29

Block 3

0

− 2

0

0

30

Block 3

− 2

0

0

0

  1. For CSL; − 2 = 0.4%, − 1 = 0.6%, 0 = 0.8%, + 1 = 1.0%, + 2 = 1.2%; CaSO4; − 2 = 0.01%, − 1 = 0.015%, 0 = 0.02%, + 1 = 0.025, + 2 = 0.03%; MgSO4; − 2 = 0.01%, − 1 = 0.015%, 0 = 0.02%, + 1 = 0.025, + 2 = 0.03%; Tween 80; − 2 = 0.02%, − 1 = 0.04%, 0 = 0.06%, + 1 = 0.08%, + 2 = 0.1%