Skip to main content

Table 3 Strain characteristics potentially involved in pathogenicity on plants

From: Diversity of pathogenic Pseudomonas isolated from citrus in Tunisia

Strainsa

Taxonomic position

Pathogenicity on lemonc

Pathogenicity on cantaloupee

HRf

Toxin produc-tiong

INAh

Necrosis diameter after injection in fruit(cm)

Necrosis diameter after spraying fruit (cm)

Necrosis surface after infiltration of leaves (cm2)

Mean symptom rate

F. of plants with rate > 1

Agressivness

HR ontobacco

Inhibition zone (cm)

Syringomycinproduction

Freezing Test (°C)

Ice nucleationactivity

BE12A

P. congelans(PG02c)

0.1 ± 0.1

0.0

0

3.3

1.0

 + 

 ± 

0.6

 + 

− 1.5

 + 

BE1

P. syringae (PG02b)

1.7 ± 0.4

0.8 ± 0.5

0.9

3.6

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 1.5

 + 

BE3

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.2 ± 0.4

1.0 ± 0.3

1.2

3.5

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 2.1

 + 

ly3DA

P. syringae (PG02b)

1.9 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.1

1.0

3.6

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 2.6

 + 

ly3EA

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.9 ± 0.4

1.2 ± 0.2

1.1

2.3

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.5

 + 

ly3GB

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.7 ± 0.1

0.8 ± 0.1

1.3

2.5

0.9

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 2.6

 + 

ly5HA

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.1 ± 1.0

0.7 ± 0.2

1.0

3.8

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.5

 + 

lyGA

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.6 ± 0.1

0.8 ± 0.2

1.0

2.8

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.4

 + 

lyGC

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.0 ± 0.1

1.2 ± 0

0.9

0.0

0.0

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.5

 + 

KB49

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.3 ± 0.4

1.4 ± 0.3

1.0

3.5

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 2.5

 + 

KC19

P. syringae(PG02b)

2.8 ± 0.4

1.6 ± 0.2

1.0

3.3

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.9

 + 

KC29B2

P. syringae(PG02b)

3.3 ± 0.4

0.9 ± 0.1

1.1

3.1

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 1.7

 + 

KC46

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.3 ± 0.3

0.0

0.8

3.7

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 2.2

 + 

KC54

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.4 ± 0.2

1.1 ± 0.4

1.1

3.8

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 1.2

 + 

KC55

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.5 ± 0.8

1.6 ± 0.2

0.9

2.8

0.8

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 1.4

 + 

KC82

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.8 ± 0.4

0.5 ± 01

1.0

3.7

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.6

 + 

− 1.6

 + 

TRR12

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.5 ± 0.4

0.0

1.0

2.7

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 1.4

 + 

TRR15

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.5 ± 0.3

0.7 ± 0.1

1.2

2.8

0.9

 + 

 + 

1.3

 + 

− 2.4

 + 

TRR9

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.7 ± 0.2

0.3 ± 0.4

0.9

2.8

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.4

 + 

− 1.6

 + 

E10AA

P. syringae (PG02b)

1.8 ± 0.3

1.2 ± 0.1

1.5

3.2

1.0

 + 

 + 

1

 + 

− 1.3

 + 

E10CA

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.8 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.1

0.8

3.0

1.0

 + 

 + 

0.7

 + 

− 2.0

 + 

E10CB2

P. syringae(PG02b)

1.8 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.3

1.2

3.5

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 1.8

 + 

E11

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.7 ± 0.6

1.4 ± 0.1

1.1

2.3

0.6

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 2.1

 + 

E12A

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.6 ± 0.1

2.5 ± 0.3

1.2

3.2

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 1.6

 + 

E91

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.0 ± 0.4

1.9 ± 0.4

1.0

3.8

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.1

 + 

− 1.8

 + 

E93A

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.0 ± 0.4

0.5 ± 0.2

1.1

3.0

0.8

 + 

 + 

0.9

 + 

− 2.3

 + 

E9A

P. syringae (PG02b)

3.0 ± 0.3

2.2 ± 0.3

0.7

3.7

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.5

 + 

− 1.2

 + 

EL1A

P. syringae (PG02b)

2.2 ± 0.3

0.0

1.0

2.9

0.9

 + 

 + 

0.7

 + 

−1.2

 + 

EL2

P. syringae (PG02b)

4.1 ± 0.2

0.8 ± 0.3

0.8

2.7

0.9

 + 

 + 

0.6

 + 

− 0.9

 + 

M5*

P. syringae (PG02b)

1.5 ± 0.1

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

M47*

P. syringae (PG02b)

1.6 ± 0.4

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

V2A2F14*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

1.1 ± 0.3

ND

ND

2.5

0.9

 + 

0.0

ND

ND

V2A2F15*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.0

ND

ND

V2A2F27*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

1.2 ± 0.1

ND

ND

2.3

0.9

 + 

0.2

 ± 

ND

ND

V2A2F45*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

1.3 ± 0.4

ND

ND

0.0

0

1.5

 + 

ND

ND

V2A2F52*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

ND

ND

ND

0.1

0.1

0.0

ND

ND

V2A2F79*

P. cerasi(PG02a)

ND

ND

ND

0.0

0.0

0.0

ND

ND

CC94b

P. syringae(PG02d)

ND

ND

ND

2.7

1.0

 + 

 + 

1.2

 + 

− 3.2

 + 

Waterb

0

0

0

0.0

0

0

 > 10

  1. a Strainwith * were lost during the study and were no longer available to do all tests
  2. b CC94: positive control. Water: negative control
  3. c Necrotic diameters on fruits were measured in cm, lesion areas on leaves were expressed in cm2 (average of three replicates ± standard deviation)
  4. d ND, not determined
  5. e Symptom intensity on cantaloupe was rated on 12 seedlingsfrom 0 (no symptom) to 4 (dead plantlet) seven days after inoculation with 106 cells. F. of plants with rate > 1: Frequency of plants with rate > 1
  6. f HR, Hypersensitive Response of tobacco after infiltration of a leaf with 106 bacteria. The reading was done 48 h after infiltrationg Production of syringomycine-like toxins was tested on agar medium usingGeotrichumalbicansas a test organism
  7. h INA, Ice Nucleation Activity was tested with bacterial suspension at 106cells/ml