Skip to main content

Table 3 ANOVA analysis of the predicted responses for quadratic polynomial models

From: Optimization of an efficient solid-phase enrichment medium for Salmonella detection using response surface methodology

Group

Equation

Source

SS

DF

MS

F-value

Prob > F

Y1

CV% = 8.69

Model (Y1)

6080.75

9

675.64

13.76

0.0002

R2 = 0.9253

Residual

491.00

10

49.10

  

AdjR2 = 0.8580

Lack-of-fit

445.27

5

89.05

9.74

0.0130

PredR2 = − 0.4747

Pure error

45.73

5

9.15

  

AdeqP = 10.773

Total

6571.75

19

   

Y2

CV% = 6.56

Model (Y2)

6418.45

9

713.16

25.47

< 0.001

R2 = 0.9582

Residual

279.98

10

28.00

  

AdjR2 = 0.9206

Lack-of-fit

271.65

5

54.33

32.60

0.0008

PredR2 = 0.6907

Pure error

8.33

5

1.67

  

AdeqP = 15.404

Total

6698.44

19

   
  1. SS sum of squares, DF degrees of freedom, MS mean squared, CV% variation coefficient, R2 determination coefficient, AdjR2 adjusted R-squared, PredR2 predR-squared, A deqP adequate precision