Skip to main content

Table 1 The volatile aroma compounds identified and quantified in the lily rice wine that obtained from traditional- and present experimental technology (under the optimum conditions)

From: Improvement of the aroma of lily rice wine by using aroma-producing yeast strain Wickerhamomyces anomalus HN006

Number

Aroma compounds

Retention time (min)

Identification

Contents of volatile aroma compounds in 3 samples (mg/L)

Raw material

Traditional technology

Present experimental technology

 

Esters

ES1

Isopentyl acetate

3.785

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.940

ES2

Isoamyl butyrate

6.775

MS, RI

ND

0.520

0.611

ES3

Ethyl oenanthate

8.163

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.675

ES4

Ethyl caprylate

10.781

MS, RI

ND

1.074

2.481

ES5

Hexyl formate

11.33

MS, RI

ND

0.581

0.673

ES6

Ethyl pelargonate

13.115

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.690

ES7

Ethyl caprate

15.468

MS, RI

ND

1.211

4.380

ES8

Isoamyl caprylate

15.878

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.572

ES9

Phenethyl acetate

19.399

MS, RI

ND

2.145

8.479

ES10

Ethyl laurate

19.91

MS, RI

ND

2.874

6.789

ES11

Isopentyl pentadecanoate

20.257

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.587

ES12

Ethyl acetate

22.87

MS, RI

ND

ND

8.320

ES13

Ethyl myristate

24.004

MS, RI

ND

6.450

7.015

ES14

Methyl palmitate

27.108

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.455

ES15

Ethyl palmitate

27.907

MS, RI

ND

11.625

41.835

ES16

E-11-hexadecenoic acid, ethyl

28.338

MS, RI

ND

ND

2.823

ES17

Ethyl stearate

31.284

MS, RI

ND

ND

2.937

ES18

Ethyl oleate

31.663

MS, RI

ND

0.652

1.758

ES19

Ethyl linoleate

32.218

MS, RI

ND

10.325

12.593

ES20

Ethyl linolenate

33.057

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.336

ES21

Ethyl, 9-cis, 11-trans-octadecadienoate

33.498

MS, RI

ND

0.123

0.329

 

Σ

  

0

37.580

105.278

 

Acids

AC1

Acetic acid

11.601

MS, RI

ND

0.65

2.649

AC2

Butanoic acid

15.588

MS, RI

ND

20.349

0.676

AC3

2-Methyl hexanoic acid

16.604

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.712

AC4

Pentadecanoic acid

20.345

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.793

AC5

Octanoic acid

24.565

MS, RI

ND

ND

1.961

AC6

Nonanoic acid

26.534

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.435

AC7

n-Decanoic acid

28.552

MS, RI

ND

0.412

3.094

AC8

Dodecanoic acid

31.877

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.726

AC9

Oleic acid

34.243

MS, RI

ND

ND

1.634

AC10

Linoleic acid

36.066

MS, RI

ND

2.11

10.16

AC11

Myristic acid

34.413

MS, RI

ND

1.418

2.24

AC12

Pentadecanoic acid

35.694

MS, RI

ND

0.354

1.235

AC13

Hexadecanoic acid

37.246

MS, RI

6.77

0.213

0.242

AC14

n-Hexadecanoic acid

37.265

MS, RI

ND

22.345

31.820

 

Σ

  

6.77

47.851

58.377

 

Alcohols

AL1

Isoamyl alcohol

7.254

MS, RI

ND

0.714

5.331

AL2

2-Nonanol

9.519

MS, RI

ND

1.27

2.186

AL3

2,3-Butanediol

13.506

MS, RI

ND

0.390

2.373

AL4

1-Octanol

13.746

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.664

AL5

2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol

15.184

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.482

AL6

2-Tetradecanol

17.411

MS, RI

ND

ND

5.858

AL7

Phenylethyl alcohol

21.525

MS, RI

ND

2.369

39.518

AL8

2-Dodecanol

21.613

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.561

AL9

Isoborneol

27.291

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.625

AL10

Glycerin

29.429

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.668

 

Σ

  

0

4.743

58.266

 

Aldehydes

AD1

Decanal

12.131

MS, RI

ND

0.214

0.683

AD2

4-Methylbenzaldehyde

23.632

MS, RI

ND

ND

5.324

 

Σ

  

0

0.214

6.007

 

Ketones

KE1

2-Octanone

7.103

MS, RI

ND

0.221

2.529

KE2

2-Undecanone

14.472

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.391

KE3

2-Tridecanone

19.159

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.473

KE4

2-Nonanone

23.695

MS, RI

ND

2.350

0.67

KE5

5-Heptyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone

30.01

MS, RI

ND

ND

4.034

 

Σ

  

0

2.571

8.097

 

Alkenes

AK1

1,3,5-(3E,5Z)-1,3,5-Undecatriene

9.778

MS, RI

ND

ND

0.623

AK2

2-Tetradecene

30.167

MS, RI

ND

1.462

0.651

AK3

1,15-Hexadecadiene

30.634

MS, RI

ND

ND

3.702

 

Σ

  

0

1.462

4.976

 

Volatile phenols

VP1

4-Vinylguaiacol

26.698

MS, RI

ND

8.32

12.24

 

Σ

  

0

8.32

12.24

 

Thiazoles

TH1

2-Mercapto-4-phenylthiazole

12.11

MS, RI

ND

ND

1.23

 

Σ

  

0

0

1.23

  1. MS compounds were identified by MS spectra, RI compounds were identified by comparison with RI from literature, ND not detected