Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparsion of mean relative abundance of bacterial genera among groups

From: Dietary supplementation with fermented Mao-tai lees beneficially affects gut microbiota structure and function in pigs

Genus (%) Control Treat 1 Treat 2 Treat 3
Roseburia 1.058 ± 0.135a 1.308 ± 0.198a 2.602 ± 0.494ab 3.061 ± 0.621b
Butyricicoccus 0.166 ± 0.080a 0.148 ± 0.044a 0.479 ± 0.113b 0.145 ± 0.036a
Peptostreptococcaceae_unclassified genus 0.186 ± 0.069ab 0.233 ± 0.065a 0.061 ± 0.013ab 0.016 ± 0.054b
Dorea 0.080 ± 0.020ab 0.055 ± 0.017a 0.175 ± 0.049b 0.036 ± 0.016a
Clostridium 0.169 ± 0.012a 0.185 ± 0.021a 0.064 ± 0.031b 0.024 ± 0.017b
Desulfovibrio 0.023 ± 0.019a 0.007 ± 0.004a 0.02 ± 0.002a 0.245 ± 0.110b
Phascolarctobacterium 0.180 ± 0.11a 0.148 ± 0.079a 0.469 ± 0.080ab 0.732 ± 0.218b
SMB53 8.737 ± 3.998ab 12.069 ± 3.383a 2.858 ± 1.065ab 0.296 ± 0.051b
Oxalobacter 0.002 ± 0.002a 0.006 ± 0.006ab 0.001 ± 0.001a 0.042 ± 0.019b
Defluviitalea 0.047 ± 0.018a 0.056 ± 0.030ab 0.143 ± 0.019b 0.067 ± 0.020ab
Clostridiaceae_unclassified genus 5.549 ± 2.137a 6.798 ± 2.280a 2.318 ± 0.359b 0.303 ± 0.068b
Peptostreptococcaceae_unclassified genus 0.146 ± 0.068a 0.159 ± 0.041a 0.039 ± 0.013a 0.007 ± 0.010a
Prevotella 4.264 ± 2.183ab 2.973 ± 0.940a 9.349 ± 1.695ab 16.127 ± 5.704b
Peptococcus 0.083 ± 0.069a 0.053 ± 0.019ab 0.023 ± 0.007ab 0.012 ± 0.004b
  1. Only those genera that were significant different genera (P < 0.05) among all groups are shown
  2. Data was expressed as mean ± SE obtained from 6 individual pigs each. Significant difference is indicated by different letters between groups. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to test the differences. P-values were corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). The group control, treat 1, treat 2, and treat 3 signify that feed is supplemented with 0, 5%, 10%, or 15% F fermented Mao-tai lees, respectively