Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparsion of mean relative abundance of bacterial genera among groups

From: Dietary supplementation with fermented Mao-tai lees beneficially affects gut microbiota structure and function in pigs

Genus (%)

Control

Treat 1

Treat 2

Treat 3

Roseburia

1.058 ± 0.135a

1.308 ± 0.198a

2.602 ± 0.494ab

3.061 ± 0.621b

Butyricicoccus

0.166 ± 0.080a

0.148 ± 0.044a

0.479 ± 0.113b

0.145 ± 0.036a

Peptostreptococcaceae_unclassified genus

0.186 ± 0.069ab

0.233 ± 0.065a

0.061 ± 0.013ab

0.016 ± 0.054b

Dorea

0.080 ± 0.020ab

0.055 ± 0.017a

0.175 ± 0.049b

0.036 ± 0.016a

Clostridium

0.169 ± 0.012a

0.185 ± 0.021a

0.064 ± 0.031b

0.024 ± 0.017b

Desulfovibrio

0.023 ± 0.019a

0.007 ± 0.004a

0.02 ± 0.002a

0.245 ± 0.110b

Phascolarctobacterium

0.180 ± 0.11a

0.148 ± 0.079a

0.469 ± 0.080ab

0.732 ± 0.218b

SMB53

8.737 ± 3.998ab

12.069 ± 3.383a

2.858 ± 1.065ab

0.296 ± 0.051b

Oxalobacter

0.002 ± 0.002a

0.006 ± 0.006ab

0.001 ± 0.001a

0.042 ± 0.019b

Defluviitalea

0.047 ± 0.018a

0.056 ± 0.030ab

0.143 ± 0.019b

0.067 ± 0.020ab

Clostridiaceae_unclassified genus

5.549 ± 2.137a

6.798 ± 2.280a

2.318 ± 0.359b

0.303 ± 0.068b

Peptostreptococcaceae_unclassified genus

0.146 ± 0.068a

0.159 ± 0.041a

0.039 ± 0.013a

0.007 ± 0.010a

Prevotella

4.264 ± 2.183ab

2.973 ± 0.940a

9.349 ± 1.695ab

16.127 ± 5.704b

Peptococcus

0.083 ± 0.069a

0.053 ± 0.019ab

0.023 ± 0.007ab

0.012 ± 0.004b

  1. Only those genera that were significant different genera (P < 0.05) among all groups are shown
  2. Data was expressed as mean ± SE obtained from 6 individual pigs each. Significant difference is indicated by different letters between groups. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to test the differences. P-values were corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). The group control, treat 1, treat 2, and treat 3 signify that feed is supplemented with 0, 5%, 10%, or 15% F fermented Mao-tai lees, respectively