References | Substrate | AD pattern | Method | Methanogenic archaea community | Bacterial community |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shigematsu et al. (2006) | Oleic and palmitic acids | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 37 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera Methanosaeta Methanosarcina Methanospirillum | Dominant phyla Bacteroidetes Spirochaetes syntrophomonadaceae |
Sousa et al. (2007b) | MixLCFA, Palmitate 32–48%; Myristate 11–15%; oleate 23–26% | Batch, 35 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera Methanosaeta Methanosarcina | Dominant phyla(80%) Clostridiaceae |
Baserba et al. (2012) | Oleate | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 55 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera Methanosarcina Methanococcus | Dominant phyla Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Proteobacteria Thermotogae |
Yang et al. (2016) | FOG and sewage sludge | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing | Dominant genera Methanosarcinales (11.7%) Methanosaeta (13.2%) | Dominant phyla: Actinobacteria (28.4%) Firmicutes (22.9%) Bacteroidetes (12.5%) |
Ziels et al. (2016) | FOG and municipal sludge | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing +qPCR | Dominant genera Methanosaeta (23 → 45%) Methanospirillum (1.3 → 34%) Methanosphaera (0 → 7%) | Dominant genera Syntrophomonas (1.2 → 9.0%) Gelria |
Present study | FOG solely | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing | Dominant genera Methanosaeta (82 → 45 → 82%) Methanoculleus (4 → 25 → 2%) Methanospirillum (7 → 18 → 8%) Methanosarcina (4 → 40%) | Dominant genera Syntrophomonas (12 → 35%) Anaerovibrio (10 → 40 → 20%) |