Table 2 Comparison of the PBDEs degradation efficiency reported in previous reports
PBDEs | Time | Initial concentration | Degradation bacteria | Degradation efficiency | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDE 209 | 30 days | 65 μg/L | Stenotrophomonas sp. strain WZN-1 | 55.15% | This study |
Diphenyl ether, 4-bromo-, 2,4-dibromo-,4,4′-dibromodiphenyl ether | 8 days | 1 g/L diphenyl ether | Sphingomonas sp. PH-07 | 100% (diphenyl ether), 23% (4-bromo), 14% (2,4-dibromophenyl ether), 8% (4,4′dibromodiphenyl ether) | Kim et al. (2007) |
Tetra-, penta- and hexa-BDEs | 3 days | 17 ng/mL | Rhodococcus jostii RHA1, Burkholderia xenovorans LB400, Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans CB1190 | RHA1 transformed greater than 90% of mono- and di-BDE congeners, LB400 transformed 10–45% of penta-BDE congeners | Robrock et al. (2009) |
Octa-BDE | 2 months | 45 nM nona-BDE, 181 nM octa-BDEs, 294 nM hepta-BDE, and 19 nM hexa-BDE | Dehalococcoides species | – | Lee and He (2010) |
BDE 47, 99, 100 | 14 days | 1180 nM | Dehalococcoides and Desulfovibrio spp. | 88–100% | Lee et al. (2011) |
BDE 209 | 6 days | 6Â mg/L | Lysinibacillus fusiformis DB-1 | < 20% | Deng et al. (2011) |
BDE 209 | 90 days | 10 μM of BDE 209 | Pseudomonas spp. | < 12% | Qiu et al. (2012) |
BDE 209 | 12 days | 1Â mg/L | Bacillus cereus JP12 | 88% | Lu et al. (2013) |
Octa and penta-BDE technical mixtures | 21Â weeks | 280Â nM PBDEs in an octa-BDE mixture | Acetobacterium sp. strain AG Dehalococcoides sp. strain DG | 96% | Ding et al. (2013) |
BDE 47 | 2 weeks | 20 μg/L | Pseudomonas stutzeri | 97.94% | Zhang et al. (2013) |
BDE 47 | 7 days | 50 μg/L | Pseudomonas putida sp. strain TZ-1 | 49.96% | Xin et al. (2014) |
BDE 209 | 7 days | 1Â mg/L | Enterococcus casseliflavus | 52.2% | Tang et al. (2016) |
BDE 209 | 12 days | 0.5Â mg/L | Staphylococcus haemolyticus LY1 and Bacillus pumilus LY2 | 29.8 and 39.2% | Wang et al. (2016) |
BDE 209 BDE 209 | 144Â h 5 days | 50Â mg/L 20Â mg/L | Rhodococcus sp. Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 65.1% 85.12% |