Skip to main content

Table 2 Phylogenetic frequency and affiliation of bacteria on hemp fibres retted for different times

From: Comparison of traditional field retting and Phlebia radiata Cel 26 retting of hemp fibres for fibre-reinforced composites

Phylum

Bacterial species

% of total bacterial communitya

Field retting time (day)

Accession number

Genus

Species

Old (similarity-%) new

0

7

14

20

α-Proteo-bacteria

Rhizobium

soli

0

14 [1]

17 [2]

16 [5]

NR115996 (97%) LT622055

Sphingomonas

aerolata

0

0

8 [1]

3 [1]

NR042130 (98%) LT622056

ß-Proteo-bacteria

Massilia

aurea

0

14 [1]

25 [3]

16 [5]

NR042502 (99%) LT622057

γ-Proteobacteria

Erwinia

aphidicola

0

0

8 [1]

3 [1]

NR104724 (99%) LT622058

Pantoea

agglomerans brenneri

0

0

0

16 [5]

NR041978 (99%) LT622059

0

0

0

3 [1]

NR116748 (99%) LT622060

Pseudomonas

argentinensis

rhizosphaera

syringae

0

14 [1]

0

10 [3]

NR043115 (97% LT622061

0

14 [1]

8 [1]

3 [1]

NR029063 (99%) LT622062

0

0

8 [1]

3 [1]

NR074597 (99%) LT622063

Shigella

sonnei

0

29 [2]

8 [1]

0

NR074894 (96%) LT622064

Bacteroidetes

Chryseobacterium

scophthalmum

0

0

0

6 [2]

NR025386 (97%) LT622065

Hymenobacter

ginsengisoli

norwichensis

0

0

0

3 [1]

NR108904 (96%) LT622066

0

0

0

10 [3]

NR042172 (99%) LT622067

Pedobacter

hartonius

namyangjuensis

0

0

8 [1]

3 [1]

NR104917 (95%) LT622068

0

0

0

3 [1]

NR113980 (97%) LT622069

Totals  % [no. clones]

 

0 [0]

100 [7]

100 [12]

100 [31]

 
  1. aPercentage based on total number of sequences for each retting period. In brackets is the number of clones identified