Skip to main content

Table 2 Phylogenetic frequency and affiliation of bacteria on hemp fibres retted for different times

From: Comparison of traditional field retting and Phlebia radiata Cel 26 retting of hemp fibres for fibre-reinforced composites

Phylum Bacterial species % of total bacterial communitya
Field retting time (day)
Accession number
Genus Species Old (similarity-%) new
0 7 14 20
α-Proteo-bacteria Rhizobium soli 0 14 [1] 17 [2] 16 [5] NR115996 (97%) LT622055
Sphingomonas aerolata 0 0 8 [1] 3 [1] NR042130 (98%) LT622056
ß-Proteo-bacteria Massilia aurea 0 14 [1] 25 [3] 16 [5] NR042502 (99%) LT622057
γ-Proteobacteria Erwinia aphidicola 0 0 8 [1] 3 [1] NR104724 (99%) LT622058
Pantoea agglomerans brenneri 0 0 0 16 [5] NR041978 (99%) LT622059
0 0 0 3 [1] NR116748 (99%) LT622060
Pseudomonas argentinensis
rhizosphaera
syringae
0 14 [1] 0 10 [3] NR043115 (97% LT622061
0 14 [1] 8 [1] 3 [1] NR029063 (99%) LT622062
0 0 8 [1] 3 [1] NR074597 (99%) LT622063
Shigella sonnei 0 29 [2] 8 [1] 0 NR074894 (96%) LT622064
Bacteroidetes Chryseobacterium scophthalmum 0 0 0 6 [2] NR025386 (97%) LT622065
Hymenobacter ginsengisoli
norwichensis
0 0 0 3 [1] NR108904 (96%) LT622066
0 0 0 10 [3] NR042172 (99%) LT622067
Pedobacter hartonius
namyangjuensis
0 0 8 [1] 3 [1] NR104917 (95%) LT622068
0 0 0 3 [1] NR113980 (97%) LT622069
Totals  % [no. clones]   0 [0] 100 [7] 100 [12] 100 [31]  
  1. aPercentage based on total number of sequences for each retting period. In brackets is the number of clones identified