Skip to main content

Table 2 t-test to determine the significance of the difference between the mean of R values of antibody-CBMEGV and non-CBM EGVs

From: The binding of cellulase variants to dislocations: a semi-quantitative analysis based on CLSM (confocal laser scanning microscopy) images

 

Antibody-CBMEGV

EGV without CBM

EGV inactive without CBM

Antibody-CBMEGV vs EGV without CBM

Antibody-CBMEGV vs EGV inactive without CBM

Mean R

2.08

1.22

1.41

  

Number of samples

28

28

22

  

Total samples

   

28 + 28 = 56

28 + 22 = 50

2-Tailed probability points of t-distribution at 5 % level

   

2.01

2.01

Standard error of measurement*

   

0.26

0.28

Mean difference

   

2.08 − 1.22 = 0.86

2.08 − 1.41 = 0.67

95 % confidence interval for the difference between population means

   

0.86 ± 2.01 × 0.26 or 0.43–1.26

0.67 ± 2.01 × 0.28 or 0.19–1.15

  

As the 95 % confidence interval does not include 0, the difference between the two means is real

  1. *Calculated according to the formula SEM = (s2 × (1/n1 + 1/n2))^0.5, where s is the combined variance of the two population involved = (SS1 + SS2)/(n1 + n2 − 2), while SS1 and SS2 are the sum of squares of the respective population and n1 and n2 are the number of samples of the respective population