Table 4 Comparative performance of dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and wheat straw
Substrate and inoculum | Temperature (°C) | TS (%) | ISR | OLR (g TCOD kg−1 inoculum day−1) | Retention time (days) | SMY (NL CH4 kg−1 VS) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 35 | 4.1–4.5 | 3.0 | 21 | 187.9 ± 16.5 | This study |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 21 | 182.9 ± 16.9 | Massé and Saady (2015c) |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 21 | 187.3 ± 18.4 | Saady and Massé (2015) |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 21 | 163.6 ± 39.5 | Saady and Massé (2015) |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 1.4 | 6.0 | 21 | 150.8 ± 32.9 | Saady and Massé (2015) |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 1.7 | 7.0 | 21 | 147.1 ± 17.2 | Massé and Saady (2015a) |
Cow feces and wheat straw | 20 | 27 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 21 | 143.2 ± 11.7 | Massé and Saady (2015a) |
CM:WWS (2:3 mass ratio) | 35 | 16 | 0.2 | 0.35a | 63 | 328 | Li et al. (2011a) |
Aerobically pre-treated SM, agricultural residues | 35 | 28 | NR | 0.28b | 130 | 55 | Di Maria et al. (2012) |
35 | 28 | NR | 0.28b | 65 | 22 | ||
DM and SG | 55 | 15 | 0.2 | NR | 62 | 28c | Ahn et al. (2010) |
Rice straw and corn stover inoculated with (1:1) sewage sludge: pig manure | 15 | NR | 156 | 346 | Sun et al. (1987) | ||
20 | NR | 156 | 339 | ||||
26–28 | 25 | 0.2 | NR | 168 | 382 | ||
30 | NR | 198 | 423 | ||||
35 | NR | 198 | 34 | ||||
85 % BM plus 15 % GS | 35 | 28 | NR | 0.9 | 100 | 227c | Schäfer et al. (2006) |
Beef manure plus straw | 32 | 18 | NR | 3.2 | 28 | 181c | Schäfer et al. (2006) |
SM, turnip rape straw and wheat straw | 35 | 16 | NR | NR | 120 | 122c | Schäfer et al. (2006) |
DM, straw, and oat husk | 38 | 17 | NR | 3.4 | 22 | 160c | Schäfer et al. (2006) |
DM, straw, and oat husk | 38 | 17 | NR | 4.1 | 22 | 84 | Schäfer et al. (2006) |
Fresh HM and straw | 37 | 20 | 0.2 | NR | 28 | 146 | Kusch et al. (2008) |
37 | 20 | 0.2 | NR | 42 | 175 | ||
37 | 20 | 0.2 | NR | 72 | 208 |